newly tenured associate professors
DESCRIPTION
Newly Tenured Associate Professors. Arlene Carney Vice Provost for Faculty & Academic Affairs. Introduction. Associate Professor status Life course of P & T. New Status. Who are you now? What does it mean in your unit? What are the challenges ahead? What are the opportunities ahead?. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Newly Tenured Associate Professors
Arlene CarneyVice Provost for Faculty & Academic
Affairs
Associate Professor status Life course of P & T
Introduction
Who are you now? What does it mean in your unit? What are the challenges ahead? What are the opportunities ahead?
New Status
Few departmental 7.12 statements made statements about the expectation to achieve the rank of professor.
Faculty Tenure was silent on this topic prior to 2007.
Criteria for promotion to professor were often brief and non-explicit in existing 7.12 statements.
Life Course of P & T
Regents Policy: Faculty Tenure http://www1.umn.edu/regents/policies/humanresources/FacultyTenure.pdf
Procedures for Reviewing Candidates for Tenure and/or Promotion: Tenure-Track and Tenured Facultyhttp://www.academic.umn.edu/provost/faculty/tenure/pdf/Procedures101207.pdf
Current Guiding Documents
Usually the shortest part of the 7.12 statement.
Most frequent criterion – a national or international reputation.
Since we have no system of reviews for associate professors, the path to promotion is not clear.
Promotion from Associate to Full Professor
New subsection of 9.2 is in the handout.
Section 9.2 of the Tenure Code
One can remain an associate professor without post-tenure review.
Do need to achieve a higher level of performance to become a professor
9.2 and Post-Tenure Review
ProbationaryPeriod
Associate ProfessorTenure
Faculty Life Course
ProbationaryPeriod
Associate ProfessorTenure
Faculty Life Course
Full Professor
Minimum StandardsFor Tenure Maintenance
ProbationaryPeriod
Associate ProfessorTenure
Faculty Life Course
Full Professor
Post-tenureReview
Fall of 2005 – 38% of associate professors on the Twin Cities campus had been at that rank for 8 years or more.
Fall of 2005 – looked at full professors who spent their careers at UMTC◦ Average time as an associate professor was 7.9
years
Current Status of Associate Professors at Minnesota
National and/or international reputation. Varies by campus and by unit. Need for a long-term plan and short-term
objectives to build the reputation is consistent across campuses and units.
Criteria for Professor
Service load Teaching focus Research burnout post tenure
Perceived Impediments
Semester leaves Sabbaticals
Research Incentives
Mentoring ◦ Peer mentoring◦ Senior faculty member
Self-imposed goal for promotion Decision about balance of one’s effort Ways and means to continue and expand on
one’s scholarly interests
Continued Needs
http://www.academic.umn.edu/provost/faculty/index.html
Provost’s Web Page
Promoted from Assistant to Associate in May, 2000
Promoted from Associate to Full in May, 2005
Connie WanbergCarlson School of Management
Academia is full of opportunity: Make choices wisely◦ Help your teaching?◦ Help your research?◦ Something you want to do personally?◦ Groom yourself for administrative role?◦ Service becomes more important but pace yourself.
Ask for portfolio from successful (recent) person who went through process in your department.
Ask for feedback Circulate in press articles to email list.
Journey from Associate to Full
Assistant (Goal to be excellent, to survive) Associate (Goal to be internationally known,
to have a real impact) Full
◦ Opportunity to ask and pursue big questions, focus on impact
◦ Mentoring◦ Running the university◦ Taking teaching to another level
Rhythms of Academic Life (Sage)
Real phenomenon Do new things Challenge yourself Collaborate with new people Attend a new conference Talk to others about it
Burnout
Book: Renewing Research Practice (Stanford Business Books)