New steps in ERTMS deployment in Spain: L2 in commercial operation and ETCS in commuter lines.

J I l iJorge Iglesias

Maite Cambronero

ADIF (Spanish Railways Infrastructure Manager)( p y g )

Summary

1. Current Status of ERTMS deployment in Spain.

2 ETCS L2 in Service: Lessons learnt2. ETCS L2 in Service: Lessons learnt

3. ETCS in Madrid commuter lines

4. ERTMS versions Migration in Spain.4. ERTMS versions Migration in Spain.

5. Conclusions.

2

1.-ERTMS L1 +L2 HS Lines in Spain1700 Kms of HSL in commercial1700 Kms of HSL in commercial operation with ERTMS with 16 interoperability cases tested .

L2 already in operation Zaragoza-Huesca / Alstom L1- 2009

Figueras-PerpignanAnsaldo L1 2010 / L2 2013

Madrid-Lleida / AnsaldoL1 2006/Orense-Santiago Thales

L1 2011 / L2 Oct 2011 310 km/h L2 2012

Madrid-Valencia-Albacete

Madrid-Valladolid ThalesL1 2007 / L2 2012

Bna-Figueras ThalesL1 2012 / L2 2013Madrid commuter lines Dimetronic-Thales

L1 2012- L2 2013

Lleida-Barcelona ThalesL1 2008 /

The longest (1250 Kms) interoperable

Dimetronic L1 2010 /La Sagra-Toledo ThalesL1 2008

L2 June 2012

L2 2012

g ( ) pHSL from Barcelona to Malaga:

Paradigm of interoperability ( 3 ETCS suppliers plus STM LZB on track and a

different supplier for the EVC)

Córdoba-Malaga DimetronicL1 2007 / L2 July 2012 Albacete- Alicante Alstom

Only L2 Dec 2012

3 3

Madrid-Sevilla LZB(1992)ERTMS NSTM LZB (2007)

3

1.- ERTMS HS Trains in Spain

4 231 train sets equipped with ETCS

1.- ERTMS Commuter and Freight trains in Spaintrains in Spain

5

ERTMS reliability: Distance between incidences and punctuality in Madrid-Barcelona HSLand punctuality in Madrid Barcelona HSL

Kms between

i idincidences

*L2 started in October 2011** Data up to March 31st

6

ERTMS reliability: Kilometers-train in Madrid-Barcelona HSL

Millions KmsYear Nr of trains (Kms) Nr of trains (Kms)

Barcelona HSL

Level 1 Level 2

2006 3.302

(1.551.940 Km)

2007 7.665

(4.139.100 Km)

2008 17.075

(10.603.575 Km)

2009 32.143 (16.457.216

Km)

2010 39.420 (20.157.660

)Km)

2011* 38.236 (19.761.324

Km)

1.244 (557.312

Km)

2012** 4.398 (2.502.617 Km) 3.665 (1.641.920

*L2 started in October 2011** D t t M h 31st

2012 4.398 (2.502.617 Km) 3.665 (1.641.920

Km)

7

** Data up to March 31st

2.ETCS L2:Why did we take so long to put in service?long to put in service?

• First L2 tests on Mad-Lleida line were performed in June 2006!

•Lack of commitment of some of the involved partners.

•Priority on developing STM for LZB•Priority on developing STM for LZB.

•L1 worked perfectly at 300 km/h.

•Complementary Tests (a kind of reception tests) were started in June 2009.

• Lines were already in commercial operation and • Lines were already in commercial operation and therefore the testing time was very limited.

8

2.ETCS L2: What are we testing with L2 Complementary Tests?

• The target of CT are to demonstrate the

L2 Complementary Tests?

• The target of CT are to demonstrate the correct behaviour of the whole train-track system.

• CT are a set of 269 tests cases which test • CT are a set of 269 tests cases which test main ERTMS functionality

• Key Management System tests. A KM procedure has been specifically procedure has been specifically developed. (414 KMAC and 85 KTRANS)

• Simultaneous trains tests.

• CTs for S-112 and S-103 trains took 41 test sessions.

9

2.ETCS L2: Reliability Tests

•More than 150.000 kms testing reliability. Main issues arised:

•Communications problems:

•Protocol V110 desynchronization

•HW failures in RBC multiplexors

•Modem train failures.

•Interferences with GSM public operators.

•Track issues:Track issues:

•Balise linking information (all balises linked in L2)

•RBC functional issues:•RBC functional issues:

•Reception of packet 1 with LRBG value ‘unknown ‘.

EVC F ti l i•EVC Functional issues:

•Wrong storage of RBC information in SL mode.

10

•Trains SW updating took almost 3 months.

2.ETCS L2: Challenges during L2 p tting into Se ice L2putting into Service L2

• Managing of superimposed L1 and L2 TSRs.

• L2 Start of Mission design: TAF procedure

• Transitions Complexity: L0, L1, L2 and LSTM LZB

• Key Management System

• Communication failures: Lack of modems specs.

• CR implementation in 2.2.2+ (i.e. SH TR CR 530)

• New operational rules

• Progressive trains upgrading from L1 to L2 (new SW) • Progressive trains upgrading from L1 to L2 (new SW) in commercial service

• Degraded Odometry

• Command Post operators and drivers training

11

2.ETCS L2: Lessons Learnt

• At the time being one ETCS level is enough!

•Modem lack of specification is a critical issue.

•Different CRs implemented by different suppliers can lead to IOP issues (in versions 2.2.2+).

•L2 Tests in lab are essential to reduce time and increase confidence on the system.

R li bilit t t it l t l •Reliability tests were vital to analyze communications problems.

12

2.ETCS L2: L2 with L1 as a backup s stemsystem

Advantages

• Higher availability. A L1 up to 300km/h as backup. (level inhibition national function needed for transition process up to put in service L2 in all the lines and trains)

• Levels 1 and 2 superimposed will allow Adif and Renfe to perform the migration from 2.2.2. to 2.3.0.d

Disadvantages• Higher cost• Higher cost.

New Spanish HS lines are now pbeing tendered only with L2 !

13

3. ERTMS in Madrid Commuter lines

• ERTMS Line C4 (73 km) in L1

• Installed by Thales (South part) and Dimetronic-Invensys (North part)

•Interface with existing IxL

• Train EVCs are supplied by Alstom (123 Civia)(123 Civia)

• Complementary tests were adapted to the specific commuter lines functionality.

•Current headway 4’ in Atocha-Chamartin tunnelChamartin tunnel

Safety level has been increased

14

y

3. ERTMS L1 main issues while installing and testinginstalling and testing

• Geographical information and SSP Geographical information and SSP updated

• ETCS and IxL timers must be d dadapted

• Many and complex Level transitions

• Dynamic 200m TSRs.

• FN 125 needed because of works ill i still in progress

• Very complex installationSmall size station cables (Nuevos Ministerios C4)

15

3. ERTMS L2 in Madrid Commuter lines

• Installing and testing 2 RBCs different technologies: Thales (South part) and Dimetronic (N th t)(North part)

• Increase of capacity about 15%

RBC

15%

• Up to 60 trains simultaneously in L2

RBC

Safety and Capacity level will be increased

16

4.ERTMS versions Migration in Spain.

All the HS existing trains are 2.2.2+ with different CRs i l t d i hOrense Santiago

Vall-Palencia-León-Pajares ASFA y N2

Figueras-Perpignan2012 -N1-2 AnsaldoZaragoza-Huesca

N1- Alstom (2009)

Talgo S102-330ERTMS Siemens

implemented in each one

Orense- SantiagoERTMS-N1-2 Thales (2011)

Pajares ASFA y N2 (2.3.0.d.) Dic 2012

Madrid-LleidaERTMS-N1-2 Ansaldo (2004-2006)

2.2.2 +

2.3.0Siemens S103- 350 ERTMS Siemens

2 3 0 d

2.3.0.d2.3.0.d

Olmedo-Zamora ASFA y N2 (2.3.0.d.) Dic 2012

Madrid-ValladolidERTMS-N1-2 Thales (2007)

Barcelona-Figueras2012-N1-2 ThalesMadrid-Valencia-

Albacete

2.2.2 + 2.2.2 +2.2.2 +

ALstom S104 250 k/h 2 3 0 d

2.3.0.d2.3.0.d

Lleida-BarcelonaERTMS-N1-2 Thales (2006-2008)

2010 -N1-2 DimetronicMadrid commuter linesERTMS-N1-2 (2010) Dimetronic-Thales

ALstom S104- 250 k/h ERTMS Alstom

2.3.0.d

2.3.0.d

Lines and trains in commercialLa Sagra-ToledoERTMS-N1-2 Thales

Madrid-Sevilla LZB(1992)ERTMS NSTM LZB (2007)

CAF S120 250 km/h AVERTMS Ansaldo

2.3.0.dLines and trains in commercial exploitation shall be migrated to version 2.3.0.d. before the

Córdoba-MalagaERTMS-N1-2 Dimetronic(2006-2007)

2.2.2 +Talgo S130 250 km/h AVERTMS Bombardier

Albacete-Alicante ASFA y N2 (2.3.0.d.) Dic 2012

to version 2.3.0.d. before the end of 2014.

17DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DE L’INFRASTRUCTUREDirection d’Innovation Technologique17

Dic 2012

5.- Conclusions.

1. ERTMS L2 is already in operation in Spain.

2. L2 first months operation reliability is better than the i iti l b h i f L1It is important to have a good strategyinitial behavior of L1.

3. New lines in Spain will be tendered only with L2.

4 Migration to version 2 3 0 d is going to be performed

It is important to have a good strategy

but occasionaly,4. Migration to version 2.3.0.d. is going to be performed before the end of 2014. The fact of having L1 and L2 allow performing the migration without interruption of commercial service.it is also important to get results !

y,

5. ERTMS L1 is in operation in Madrid commuter lines and L2 is under tests.

18

New steps in ERTMS deployment in New steps in ERTMS deployment in Spain: L2 in commercial operation

and ETCS in commuter lines.and ETCS in commuter lines.jorge.iglesias@adif.esmcambronero@adif.es

Thank you forThank you for your kind attentionyour kind attention