new 3d!ultrasound!for!the!diagnosis! … · 2016. 5. 23. ·...

10
L. Bouschbacher, K. PoletLefebvre, R. Callec, P. Judlin, O. Morel, C. Mezan De Malar@c 3D ultrasound for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correla6on with pathologic findings

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • L.  Bouschbacher,    K.  Polet-‐Lefebvre,  R.  Callec,    

    P.  Judlin,  O.  Morel,  C.  Mezan  De  Malar@c  

    3D  ultrasound  for  the  diagnosis  of  adenomyosis:  correla6on  with  

    pathologic  findings  

  • Introduc6on  

    Diagnosis  of  adenomyosis  =  histopathology    Ectopic  endometrial  glands    within  a  hypertrophic    and  hyperplasic  myometrium    

    Prevalence  ?  

    2  Bird.  The  elusive  adenomyosis  of  the  uterus  –  revisited.  Am  J  Obstet  Gynecol.  1972  

    Myometrium  Endométrial  glands  

    Endométrial  stroma  

    Histological  sec@on,  uterus  x10  (CHRU  Nancy)  

  • Pelvic  2D  ultrasound    •  Sensi6vity  53  –  89  %    •  Specificity  50  –  99  %  

    Major  criteria    •  Se:  Heterogeinity  of  the  myometrium  •  Spe:  Linear  streaks  under  the  endometrium  

    3  

    Dueholm.TVUS  for  diagnosis  of  adenomyosis:  a  review.  Best  Pract  Res  Clin  Obstet  Gynaecol.  2006  Meredith.Dic  accuracy  of  TVUS  for  the  diag  of  adenomyosis:  systema@c  review  and  metaanalysis.AJOG2009    Kepkep.TVUS  in  the  diag  of  adenomyosis:  which  findings  are  most  accurate?  Ultrasound  Obstet  Gynecol  2007    

     

    Introduc6on  

  • Pelvic  3D  ultrasound  (3DUS)  •  Coronal  sec6on  of  the  uterus  +++  •  Junc6onal  zona  •  Very  promising  performances:    

     Se  90  %  /  Spe  80  %    •  To  be  confirmed  !  ...  

    Aim  of  our  study:  evaluate  3DUS  for  the  diagnosis  of  adenomyosis  in  an  unselected  popula6on  of  women  undergoing  a  hysterectomy    

    4  Exacoutos.Adenomyosis:3D  sonographic  findings  of  the  JZ  and  correla@on  with  histology.Ultrasound  Obstet  Gynecol  2011  Luciano.3DUS  in  diagnosis  of  adenomyosis:histologic  correla@on  with  US  targeted  biopsies.J  Minim  Invasive  Gynecol  2013  

    Introduc6on  

  • Pa6ents  &  methods    

    5  

    #  Pathology  reports   #  Ultrasound  reports  

    21  months  

  • 6  

    Standardized    3DUS  criteria  

    Pa6ents  &  methods    

    Anechogene  cysts   Linear  streaks  

    Myometrium  asymmetry   Irregular  JZ   Adenomyoma  

  • Results    

    •  September  2013  to  June  2015  •  248  hysterectomies          

    7  Opera@ve  indica@ons  for  248  hysterectomies  

    41%  

    21%  

    30%  

    6%  2%  

    Bleeding  

    Pelvic  pain  

    Neoplasia  

    Prolapse  

    Sex  change  

  • •  81  preopera6ve  3DUS  •  43  %  of  adenomyosis  on  pathology  reports          

    8  

    Results    

    Without  cancers                        Se  79%        Spe  81%  

    Without    fibroïds  Se  100%  Spe  90%  

    Without      >  50  years  Se  89%  Spe  71%      

    3DUS  performances  

    Global  performances  Se  78%    Spe  78%  VPP  74%  VPN  81%  

  • Discussion    

    9  

    CHRU  Nancy  

    Retrospec6ve  81  pa6ents  

    All  hysterectomies  

    Se  78%  Spe  78%  

    Exacoutos  

    Prospec6ve  72  pa6ents  

    <  50  years  and  begnin  

    pathology  

    Se  91%    Spe  88%  

    Luciano  Prospec6ve  32  pa6ents  

    <  50  years  and  symptoma6c  

    Se  92%  Spe  83%  

    Exacoutos.Adenomyosis:3D  sonographic  findings  of  the  JZ  and  correla@on  with  histology.Ultrasound  Obstet  Gynecol  2011  Luciano.3DUS  in  diagnosis  of  adenomyosis:histologic  correla@on  with  US  targeted  biopsies.J  Minim  Invasive  Gynecol  2013  

  • 10  

    •  Lower  performances  than  previously  reported  •  Beker  correspondance  with  real  life  ?  •  “Unselected”  popula6on  (…  of  women  undergoing  a  

    hysterectomy  !)  

    •  Is  pathology  really  the  gold  standard  ?    Here:  daily  prac6ce  pathology  –  performances  for  the  diagnosis  of  adenomyosis  in  an  unselected  popula6on  ?  

     

     

    Discussion