net energy production associated with pathogen inactivation during mesophilic and thermophilic...
TRANSCRIPT
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 8
Avai lab le at www.sc iencedi rect .com
journa l homepage : www.e lsev ier . com/ loca te /wat res
Net energy production associated with pathogen inactivationduring mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion ofsewage sludge
Christopher Ziemba, Jordan Peccia*
Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 14 March 2011
Accepted 15 June 2011
Available online 24 June 2011
Keywords:
Biosolids
Pathogens
Energy
Biogas
Methane
Reactivation
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ962 203 432 4E-mail address: [email protected] (
0043-1354/$ e see front matter ª 2011 Publidoi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.014
a b s t r a c t
The potential for anaerobic digester energy production must be balanced with the
sustainability of reusing the resultant biosolids for land application. Mesophilic, thermo-
philic, temperature-phased, and high temperature (60 or 70 �C) batch pre-treatment
digester configurations have been systematically evaluated for net energy production
and pathogen inactivation potential. Energy input requirements and net energy production
were modeled for each digester scheme. First-order inactivation rate coefficients for
Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis and bacteriophage MS-2 were measured at each digester
temperature and full-scale pathogen inactivation performance was estimated for each
indicator organism and each digester configuration.
Inactivation rates were found to increase dramatically at temperatures above 55 �C.
Modeling full-scale performance using retention times based on U.S. EPA time and
temperature constraints predicts a 1e2 log inactivation in mesophilic treatment, and a 2e5
log inactivation in 50e55 �C thermophilic and temperature-phased treatments. Incorpo-
rating a 60 or 70 �C batch pre-treatment phase resulted in dramatically higher potency,
achieving MS-2 inactivation of 14 and 16 logs respectively, and complete inactivation (over
100 log reduction) of E. coli and E. faecalis. For temperatures less than 70 �C, viability staining
of thermally-treated E. coli showed significantly reduced inactivation relative to standard
culture enumeration. Due to shorter residence times in thermophilic reactors, the net
energy production for all digesters was similar (less than 20% difference) with the 60 or
70 �C batch treatment configurations producing the most net energy and the mesophilic
treatment producing the least. Incorporating a 60 or 70 �C pre-treatment phase can
dramatically increase pathogen inactivation performance without decreasing net energy
capture from anaerobic digestion. Energy consumption is not a significant barrier against
improving the pathogen quality of biosolids.
ª 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
1. Introduction centralized sewage collection systems, activated sludge-based
More than 7 million dry tons of sewage sludge are produced
annually in the U.S. (Beecher et al., 2007). This figure is
expected to increase as more communities move to
385; fax: þ962 203 432 438J. Peccia).shed by Elsevier Ltd.
nutrient removal processes become more prevalent, pop-
ulations served by sewers grow, and anaerobic digestion is
developed as a renewable energy source. The U.S. EPA
encourages the treatment and beneficial reuse of stabilized
7.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 8 4759
sewage sludge (biosolids) as a solution to the high costs and
environmental impacts of incineration and land filling.
Approximately 55% of treated sewage sludge in the U.S. is
reused, primarily as a soil conditioning product and fertilizer
(Beecher et al., 2007).
While the agricultural benefits of land applying biosolids
are well documented (Evanylo et al., 2008; Khaleel et al., 1981),
there is widespread concern over pathogen exposure to resi-
dents in communities that surround land applications sites
(Lewis and Gattie, 2002; NRC, 2002). Pathogen inactivation
during anaerobic digestion is an integral component for
ensuring the safety and sustainability of biosolids reuse. With
limited information from which to estimate risk, the U.S.
EPA’s part 503 biosolids regulations were based on using best
available treatment technology to address pathogen concerns
(USEPA, 1999). These regulations established class A and class
B treatment standards and prescribed stabilization methods
necessary to meet each designation. Class A biosolids must
undergo an EPA-approved treatment process yielding fecal
coliform concentrations less than 1000 colony forming units
(CFU) per dry gram, or less than 3 most probable number
(MPN) Salmonella sp. in 4 dry grams. The resulting class A
biosolids can be sold and utilized without restriction. Class B
pathogen reduction goals are less stringent, requiring fecal
coliform concentrations less than 2 � 106 CFU or MPN per dry
gram. Class B biosolids still contain human pathogens
following treatment, therefore site restrictions and reductions
in vector attraction are also required to reduce pathogen
exposure to the public. The most common treatment tech-
nology for meeting class B requirements is anaerobic diges-
tion operating in the mesophilic range of 35e40 �C. Achievingclass A standards through digestion usually involves
increasing digester temperature to between 50 and 55 �C for
thermophilic anaerobic digestion (TAD). Temperature-phased
anaerobic digestion (TPAD) is a hybrid process which
commonly features a shorter TAD phase, for hydrolysis,
pathogen inactivation, and sometimes acetogenesis, followed
by a mesophilic anaerobic digestion (MAD) phase.
These current anaerobic digestion configurations have
known limitations for inactivating pathogens. MAD inactiva-
tion efficiency is limited and only results in one or two log
removal of fecal indicators in full-scale operation over a 15e40
day residence time (Gantzer et al., 2001; Guzman et al., 2007;
Pedersen, 1981). Although log fecal coliform reduction is
significantly greater during traditional thermophilic
processes, (50 or 55 �C) and potentially on the order of four
logs, increasing evidence suggests that TAD may not be reli-
able at permanently inactivating some bacterial pathogen
indicators. TAD processes may induce a viable but non-
culturable (VBNC) condition, from which some bacteria may
later recover. Such reactivation behavior has been demon-
strated during high-speed centrifugal dewatering of thermo-
philically digested biosolids in both Escherichia coli and fecal
enterococci (Higgins et al., 2007; Qi et al., 2007; Sahlstrom
et al., 2004; Viau and Peccia, 2009a). Reactivation has not
been reported in pasteurized biosolids. Mechanistic evidence
of ribosomal unfolding at different temperatures (Lee and
Kaletunc, 2002; Mackey et al., 1991) suggest that fecal coli-
form bacteria can be fully inactivated at temperatures at and
above approximately 60 �C.
Redesigning digesters to employ an effective pathogen
inactivation mechanism that does not significantly increase
energy consumption is essential to ensuring the safe and
economical reuse of biosolids and the development of biogas
as a sustainable alternative fuel. We hypothesize that incor-
porating a 60 �C or higher initial phase into an anaerobic
digestion process will significantly improve pathogen inacti-
vation performance over mesophilic or thermophilic treat-
ment, and that the energy efficiencies produced by a shorter
residence time and more effective hydrolysis will allow for
this greater inactivation without impacting net energy
production value. This hypothesis has been evaluated by
estimating pathogen indicator inactivation rate coefficients in
sludge as a function of temperature, identifying common
(MAD, TAD, TPAD) and alternative digestion schemes (60 and
70 �C pre-treatment), and modeling the pathogen reduction
and net energy production of each scheme. Rather than
a strict focus on meeting current regulations, this research
seeks to understand the energy costs associated with
decreasing the pathogen load in land applied biosolids.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Selection of indicator organisms
Escherichia coli was chosen as a test organism because it is
a member of the fecal coliform class, upon which the U.S. EPA
503 regulations for biosolids pathogen quality are predomi-
nantly based. Enterococcus faecalis is a representative member
of the fecal enterococci group, which are gram-positive and
have been shown to be more resistant to temperature inacti-
vation than fecal coliforms (Viau and Peccia, 2009a). MS-2 is
a commonly studied male-specific (Fþ) coliphage. A compel-
ling case has been presented in the literature that male-
specific coliphages have value as an indicator of fecal
contamination and pathogenic virus inactivation due to their
similarity to human enteric viruses in terms of structure and
persistence through treatment (Funderburg and Sorber, 1985;
Havelaar et al., 1993; Nappier et al., 2006).
2.2. Batch temperature inactivation experimentalprocedure
Batch testing was conducted in 125 ml crimp-top serum
bottles (Wheaton, Millville, NJ, USA) containing 74.5 ml of
mesophilically digested sewage sludge, adjusted to 6% solids
in phosphate buffered saline solution (PBS, 0.14MNaCl, 0.01M
phosphate, and 0.003 M KCl, American Bioanalytical, Natick,
MA). The digested sludge was obtained locally from a munic-
ipal wastewater treatment plant that utilized activated sludge
treatment, MAD stabilization and belt filter press dewatering.
Sludge characteristics are typical and presented in
Supplementary Data Table S-1. Sludges were prepared by
autoclaving for 30 min, homogenizing in a blender for 20 min
and adjusting pH to 7.5. Bottles were capped, purged with
nitrogen and acclimated to experimental temperature in
either an incubator (T ¼ 37 �C) or a water bath (T ¼ 50, 55, 60 or
70 �C). Each reactor bottle was anaerobically spiked with
0.5 ml of one of three pathogen indicator organisms, E. coli, E.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 84760
faecalis or MS-2 bacteriophage. Well mixed conditions were
established initially by vigorous shaking and maintained by
orbital shaking at 40 RPM throughout the experiments. Reac-
tors were sampled periodically by 18-gauge needle-tipped
syringe, and cultures immediately enumerated.
Due to rapid inactivation rates and slow characteristic
mixing times for the 6% solids solution, inactivation experi-
ments for E. coli and E. faecalis at 60 and 70 �C were conducted
in a series of 1 ml syringes. Sludge media was processed as in
the serum bottle reactors described above, with the exception
that the inoculumwas added and the bottles well mixedwhile
at room temperature. The inoculated sludge media was then
distributed into 1 ml syringes, capped, and submerged in
a water bath at 60 or 70 �C. After waiting 60 s for the 60 �Creactors and 80 s for the 70 �C reactors to reach temperature
(heating times were independently verified), syringes were
individually removed at 5e10 s intervals and bacteria were
enumerated. All inactivation experimental conditions were
tested in duplicate. Log-transformed data were pooled and
first-order inactivation rate constants and associated stan-
dard errors of fit were estimated by least squares regression.
To determine the potential for VBNC behavior, E. coli batch
experiments were recreated as above, at 50, 55, 60, and 70 �Cusing PBS in place of sludge. Each bottlewas inoculatedwith E.
coli and incubated for times corresponding to w4 logs of
culture-based inactivation. Bottleswere cooled in a 25 �Cwater
bath and concentrations of viable cells were determined by
staining with 5-cyano-2,3-ditolyltetrazolium chloride (CTC,
SigmaeAldrich, St. Louis, MO). Viable staining procedure con-
sisted of incubating 100 ml of sample in the dark for 90 min at
37 �C with 1/100 strength TSB at a final concentration of 5 mM
CTC.Viable cell countswere standardized to total cell count, by
independently staining with SYTO-9 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad,
CA). Total cell countprocedure consistedof incubating100ml of
sample in the dark for 20min at room temperature with a final
SYTO-9 concentration of 5 mM. CTC and SYTO-9 stained cells
were each enumerated using standardmicroscopy procedures
and appropriate fluorescent filters (Hobbie et al., 1977). Each
temperature was tested in triplicate at a residence time cor-
responding to a 4 log loss of culturability. Each residence time
was estimated and confirmed by plate count, employing the
methods described below.
2.2.1. Inoculum preparationOvernight cultures of E. coli (ATCC#15597, American Type
Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were grown at 37 �C in 5 ml
of tryptic soy broth (TSB, Difco Inc., Detroit, MI)). A 50 ml
aliquot of this overnight culture was reinoculated in 50 ml of
TSB and incubated at 37 �C underwellmixed conditions for 5 h
to reachmid-log phase. The bacteria werewashed three times
by repeated centrifugation at 5000 g for 10 min and resus-
pension in PBS, and finally suspended in 5 ml of PBS. Bacterial
concentration was determined by direct fluorescence
microscopy using 40, 6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI)
staining (SigmaeAldrich, St. Louis, MO) and standard counting
procedures (Hobbie et al., 1977). Preparation of E. faecalis
(ATCC#19433) was identical to that of E. coli, except brain heart
infusion broth (Himedia Inc., Mumbai, India) was used.
Themale-specific bacteriophageMS-2 (ATCC15597-B1)was
prepared using a modified double agar layer (DAL) method
(USEPA, 2001). In a hot water bath at 48 �C, 1 ml of MS-2 stock
and 1ml of log phaseE. coli (ATCC#15597)were added to 4ml of
molten 0.7% tryptic soy agar (TSA, Difco Inc., Detroit, MI)) in
a 30ml test tube. The test tubewas immediately removed from
thewater bath, gently rolled and poured onto a 10 cmdiameter
TSA plate. The DAL plates were allowed to cool to room
temperature, inverted and incubated at 37 �C for 24 h. To elute
phages, 2 ml of PBS was gently added to each plate and again
incubated at 37 �C for 1 h. The PBSwashwas then collected and
centrifuged at 5000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was passed
through a 0.45 mm syringe filter to remove bacteria (Whatman
Inc. Florham Park, NJ, USA), and MS-2 phages were concen-
trated using a centrifugal membrane (Millipore Inc. Billerica,
MA, USA). Final MS-2 concentration was determined by
repeating the DAL method on dilutions from the new stock
solution and counting the number of plaques in the E. coli lawn
for dilutions yielding between 30 and 300 plaques. Inoculum
concentrations were on the order of 109 CFU/ml for bacteria
and 1012 PFU/ml (plaque forming units) for MS-2.
2.2.2. Enumeration by culturingReactor samples were serially diluted in PBS to achieve
between 30 and 300 colony or plaque forming units per culture
plate. E. coli was plated on mFC agar (Difco Inc., Detroit, MI)
and incubated at 44.5 �C for 24 h (APHA et al. 2005). E. faecalis
was plated on mEI agar (Difco Inc., Detroit, MI) and incubated
at 41.5 �C for 48 h (USEPA, 2002). Enumeration of MS-2 was
conducted by the same DAL method described above, with
serial dilutions of 0.45 mm filtered reactor samples added to
the E. coli and molten TSA in place of the MS-2 Stock. All
plating was performed in duplicate.
2.3. Digester configurations
Table 1 presents seven digestion configurations selected to
represent commonly used mesophilic and thermophilic
digester temperatures, plus 60 �C and 70 �C proposed
pretreatment schemes. The selected residence times are
based on U.S. EPA part 503 class A and class B pathogen
regulations. Class B MAD treatment at 37 �C is modeled at the
U.S. EPA minimum of 15 days residence time (USEPA, 1994).
For digesters operating at or above 50 �C, with solids content
less than 7%, the EPA-mandated minimum residence times to
achieve class A standards are governed by a time and
temperature relationship (USEPA, 1994). Application of this
relationship yields a minimum residence time of 5 days in
a digester at 50 �C. TAD residence times are extended to 15
days to allow more complete solids conversion and to better
reflect the longer residence times often employed in practice
(Viau and Peccia, 2009b). The residence times in our 50 and
55 �C TPAD configurations are based on the 5 day minimum
requirement at 50 �C, followed by the standard 15 days in
MAD. At 60 and 70 �C, the EPA mandated minimum residence
times are approximately 5 and 0.5 h respectively for pathogen
inactivation. Table 1 presents a more conservative and inter-
nationally established residence time of 1 h for 70 �Cpasteurization, and the specified 5 h at 60 �C. Both 60 and 70 �Ctreatmentsmust be paired with amesophilic phase to achieve
acceptable volatile solids (VS) conversion and gas production.
The second phase is modeled as a 15 day MAD reactor.
Table 1 e Time and temperatures of the seven anaerobic digester configurations evaluated. MAD and TAD configurationsare single stage processes. (cstr) denotes completely mixed stirred tank reactor configuration.
Configuration Phase 1 Phase 2
Temperature (�C) Residence Time (days) Temperature (�C) Residence Time (days)
MAD 37 15 (cstr)
TAD 50 50 15 (cstr)
TAD 55 55 15 (cstr)
TPAD 50 50 5 (cstr) 37 15 (cstr)
TPAD 55 55 5 (cstr) 37 15 (cstr)
60 batch þ MAD 60 0.208 (5 h batch) 37 15 (cstr)
70 batch þ MAD 70 0.042 (1 h batch) 37 15 (cstr)
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 8 4761
Each digestion scheme has been configured to incorporate
heat exchangers to capture waste heat and reduce total
energy costs, a common trend in modern digester design
(Greer, 2007; Zupancic and Ros, 2003). The efficiency (the
difference between the final and initial temperatures in the
hot stream divided by the difference in initial temperatures of
the cold and hot streams) of counter-flow heat exchangers are
typically 50% (Kepp et al., 2000). For single-phase MAD and
TAD configurations listed in Table 1, heat from the digester
effluent sludge is transferred to the digester influent sludge by
a counter-flowheat exchanger. In TPAD, 60 �C batch, and 70 �Cbatch configurations, incoming sludge receives heat from two
sets of counter-flow heat exchangers. Here, influent sludge is
first preheated by captured heat from the effluent of the
second (MAD) phase and once again heated by the waste heat
from sludge leaving the first (thermophilic CSTR, 60 or 70 �Cbatch) phase.
2.4. Energy balances
The amount of energy produced by an anaerobic digester per
metric ton of wet sludge, is defined as the per ton energy
content of the biogas producedminus the per ton energy input
demands to operate the digester. This input demand includes
energy required to heat sludge to digester operating temper-
ature and the energy required to compensate for heat losses
during operation. Secondary costs such as stirring and
secondary products such as biological heat generation during
digestion are relatively insignificant (Lubken et al., 2007) and
are omitted from the net energy calculation. All analysis
assumes a 6% solids content.
2.4.1. Heat-up energy demandThe amount of heat (kWh) required per wet metric ton
(1000 kg) to heat-up sludge is the difference between the initial
and desired temperatures multiplied by the specific heat
capacity of 6% solids sludge, 1.117 � 103 kWh/kg �C (Metcalf
and Eddy, 2003). The initial temperature of sludge flowing
into a digester is the temperature at the previous source plus
temperature gained through heat exchanger recovery.
Incoming sludge to each digester configuration is initially
assumed to be 15.6 �C (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003).
2.4.2. Heat loss from reactorsThe rate of heat loss from a reactor, ( _q reactor, W) is described in
equation (1) as the sum of heat loss rates through the floor,
walls and roof.
_q reacter ¼all surfaces
�Usurface Asurface ðTreacter � ToutÞ
�(1)
X
The heat loss through each surface is the product of the
overall heat transfer coefficient through the surface (Usurface,
W/m2/ �C), the surface area (Asurface, m2) and the difference in
inside (Treacter, �C) and outside (Tout, �C) surface temperatures.
For the purpose of defining surface areas, plausible reactor
geometries have been selected to accommodate a theoretical
flow of 1.2� 102metric tons (0.45million gallons) of wet sludge
per day (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003), which corresponds to
a wastewater flow of approximately 3 � 107 L (9 million
gallons) per day. Digesters are conventionally cylindrical in
shape, drawing to a point at the bottom. For 15 day residence
time reactors, dimensions are set at 18 m in diameter, 6 m
deep at the sides and 9 m deep in the middle. The dimensions
of 5 day residence time reactors preserve the same ratio
between the diameter, side depth andmid depth, scaled down
to 1/3 volume. Wall construction for 15 and 5 day residence
time reactors is set at 0.3 m thick concrete in contact with air,
resulting in an overall heat transfer coefficient of 4.9 W/m2 �C
(USEPA, 1979). The floor is also 0.3 m thick concrete, in contact
with dry earth, resulting in an overall heat transfer coefficient
of 0.34 W/m2 �C, (USEPA, 1979). Selecting a 0.225 m thick fixed
concrete cover achieves an overall heat transfer coefficient of
3.3 W/m2 �C (USEPA, 1979). Representative external tempera-
ture values are 11.5 �C for soil and 8.6 �C for air.
In batch reactor configurations at 60 or 70 �C, the sludge is
treated using three batch reactors. The dimensions are 2.9 m
diameter, 1.9 m side depth and 2.6 mmid depth for each 60 �Creactor and 1.5 m diameter, 1.6 m side depth and 2.1 m mid
depth for each 70 �C reactor. Both sets of batch reactors are
constructed using 10 mm thick steel walls, floor and roof (Le
et al., 2002), each in contact with air, resulting in an overall
heat transfer coefficient, Usurface, of 5.167 W/m2 ��C (USEPA,
1979). It is assumed that batch reactors operate constantly
and operate at capacity. We assume 15 min fill and empty
times for 1 h residence time reactors and 30min fill and empty
times for 5 h residence time reactors. Heat losses from batch
reactors during filling and emptying phases are conservatively
modeled to be identical to heat losses during full operation.
The overall amount of heat loss per wet ton of sludge for
a specific reactor configuration (qreacter, Wh/ton treated
sludge) is depicted in Eq. (2), and determined by multiplying
the heat loss rate ( _qreacter, W, Eq. (1)) by the residence time of
interest (qreactor) and then dividing by the reactor volume
(Vreactor, L) and the density of sludge (rsludge, kg/L). The density
of 6% sludge is 1.01 kg/L (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003).
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 84762
qreacter ¼
( Pall surfaces
�Usurface Asurface ðTreactor � ToutÞ
�)qreactor
Vreactor rsludge
(2)
2.4.3. Biogas productionBiogas production was estimated using a generalized organic
waste fermentation equation that models digested sludge as
C10H19O3N and utilizes CO2 as the terminal electron acceptor,
Eq. (3) (Rittmann and McCarty, 2001).
C10H19O3Nþ �18� 22:5fs � 12:5fe
�H2O/
�6:25fe
�CH4
þ�9� 10fs � 6:25fe
�CO2 þ
�2:5fs
�C5H7O2Nþ �
1� 2:5fs�NHþ
4
þ�1þ 2:5fs
�HCO�
3 (3)
Thenet fractionof sludge organicmatter converted to cellmass
is represented as fs and the net fraction of this organic matter
that is utilized for cellular energy is represented by fe Values of
f s¼ 0.07 (and f e¼ 0.93) were estimated by previously published
relationships based on a mass balance for volatile solids in
a CSTR (Rittmann and McCarty, 2001) and using the initial
fraction converted into cells fos ¼ 0:11, the biodegradable frac-
tion of cellular biomass f d ¼ 0.8, an endogenous decay rate
b¼ 0.05 day�1, and the steady state CSTR residence timeӨ of 15
days.
A common VS conversion value of 56% was assumed for
mesophilic digestion at 15 days (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003).
Operating single phase digesters at thermophilic tempera-
tures or the presence of an initial thermophilic phase typically
improves hydrolysis and increases the bioavailability of
digestible material. Increases over MAD in VS destruction due
to either thermophilic digestion or the presence of a thermo-
philic phase have been reported to range from 7% to 11% (Ge
et al., 2010; Salsabil et al., 2010; Shimp et al., 2003). The TAD,
TPAD, and 60 and 70 �C pretreatment cases presented here are
modeled conservatively as achieving a 7% increase in VS
conversion (63% overall) over MAD treatment alone.
The raw energy value of methane (kWh) produced per ton
of digested sludge under each digester configuration can be
calculated by multiplying together the solids content (kg/kg),
the fraction VS of TS (kg/kg), the VS conversion efficiency of
the reactor (kg/kg), the number of moles of methane produced
per mole of converted sludge (mole/mole), the lower heating
value of methane (LHVCH4 ; kWh=mole), and divided by the
molecular weight of C10H19O3N (Msludge, g/mol), Eq. (4).
Incoming sewage sludge is modeled as 6% solids (Shimp et al.,
2003), with a 70% VS content (Metcalf and Eddy, 2003). The
lower heating value of methane is 0.223 kWh/mole (Perry and
Green, 1984).
Raw Energy ProducedMetric Ton Digested Sludge
¼
�% SolidsContent
��VSTS
��VS ConversionEfficiency %
��mole CH4
mole VS
�ðLHVCH4
Þ�Msludge
�� 106gmetric ton
� (4)
Finally, extracting energy value from biogas requires use-
specified purification of the gas. This model compares
energy values in terms of heat and therefore does not include
efficiencies associated with electricity generation, thus the
final value of the biogas includes only a 2% loss in total biogas
energy value for removal of water content by refrigeration
(Krich et al., 2005) and a 12% reduction from the raw energy
value due to combustion efficiency (Bekkering et al., 2010).
3. Results
3.1. Pathogen indicator inactivation kinetics determinedin anaerobic batch reactors
Inactivation rate coefficients for E. coli, E. faecalisandMS-2,were
measured in anaerobic batch reactors at 37, 50, 55, 60, and 70 �C(Fig. 1a,b,c). Inactivation profiles for each organism and
temperature are presented in Supplementary Data figures S-1,
S-2 and S-3. Increasing reactor temperature was found to
increase inactivation rate coefficients in each test organismand
the magnitude of this increase was much greater at tempera-
tures above 50 �C. Inactivation rate coefficients for E. coli and E.
faecalis in the 50e55 �C range are not statistically different
( p < 0.05) within each temperature, achieving 1.4 h�1 for E. coli
vs. 1.0h�1 forE. faecalisat50 �Cand6.8h�1 forE. colivs. 6.7h�1 for
E. faecalisat 55 �C.These rate coefficientswere 1e3 times greater
and statistically different ( p < 0.05) than that of MS-2 at 50 and
55 �C. Increasing temperature from55 to 60 �C yields a dramatic
increase in bacterial inactivation rate coefficient (significant at
p < 0.0001), and a smaller increase for MS-2. The inactivation
rate coefficient for E. coli is 94 times greater at 60 �C than at 55 �C(650 h�1) and 25 times greater in E. faecalis (177 h�1). The rate
coefficient for MS-2, in contrast, only doubled to 6 h�1. For
bacterial inactivation at 70 �C, it was determined that the 80 s
required to heat up the sludge to 70 �Cwas sufficiently lethal to
achieve complete inactivation at our limit of detection. There-
fore, no precise data are reported for E. coli or E. faecalis inacti-
vationat70 �C.Wecanconservativelyestimate inactivationrate
coefficients based on the log reduction from the seeded
concentration (typically 109 CFU/ml) to the method limits of
detection (2 � 102 CFU/ml) over the 80 s interval to be greater
than 106 h�1 for both bacteria. MS-2 inactivation at 70 �Cincreasedmore modestly to 36 h�1. At each digestion tempera-
ture MS-2 inactivation rate constants are significantly lower
( p< 0.05) than the correspondingvalues for E. coliand E. faecalis.
The inactivation kinetics obtained from batch reactor
testing have been inserted into first-order mass balance
models for CSTR or batch reactors to predict inactivation
performance for the seven residence time and reactor
temperature configurations listed in Table 1. MAD (37 �C)inactivation performance is limited to 1.1 log in E. coli, 1.6 log
in E. faecalis and 0.7 log in MS-2 (Fig. 2). Reductions in
Fig. 1 e First-order inactivation rate coefficients for E. coli,
E. faecalis and MS-2 as a function of temperature.
Experiments were carried out in batch reactors under
anaerobic conditions in autoclaved MAD biosolids at 6%
solids content and pH 7.5. Rate coefficients are
extrapolated by regression of the culturable concentration
measurements at each experimental temperature as
a function of time. Error bars represent standard error.
Insets in Figs. 1a, b and c display subsets of the full plot in
order to observe the impact of temperature on inactivation
rate coefficients below 60 or 70 �C.
Fig. 2 e Estimated digester performance for E. coli, E.
faecalis and MS-2 as log reductions in culturable
concentrations under various treatment schemes. Arrows
on E. coli and E. faecalis bars for 60 and 70 �C batch plus
MAD indicate dramatically higher log reduction values, in
excess of 100 log.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 8 4763
thermophilic single stage and phased digesters ranged from 2
to 4 logs in TAD at 50 or 55 �C and TPADat 50 �C configurations.
TPAD treatment at 55 �C displayed slightly greater inactiva-
tion with 4.0 log in E. coli, 4.5 log in E. faecalis and 3.2 log in MS-
2. Projected inactivation at 60 �C is significantly greater than in
MAD, TAD or TPAD configurations, resulting in inactivation
predictions of 13.7 log for MS-2 and greater than 100 log for E.
coli and E. faecalis. At 70 �C, E. coli and E. faecalis are again
projected to have greater than 100 log reduction and MS-2 is
predicted to be reduced by 16.4 log. Inactivation projections
for batch reactors do not include additional inactivation
occurring during filling and emptying phases.
Inactivation of E. coli at temperatures of 50, 55, 60 and 70 �Cwas also accessed by CTC viability staining and is presented in
Fig. 3. The initial viability in the E. coli inoculum was 68% of
total cells. After incubation at each temperature at times
standardized to a 4 log loss of culturability, losses in viability
were observed to be less than the losses in culturability in E.
coli. A reduction of 0.76 log viability was achieved at 50 �C, 1.31log at 55 �C and 2.14 log at 60 �C. At 70 �C the average loss of
viability was 2.93 log. The losses in viability at 50 and 55 �C are
significantly reduced from losses at 60 �C ( p < 0.001) and 70 �C( p < 0.01). The 70 �C loss of viability value of 2.93 log is not
significantly less ( p ¼ 0.063) than the 3.7 log loss exhibited in
autoclaved E. coli. The 70 �C and autoclaved E. coli reductions
are at the upper value of log reductions that can be observed
by microscopy.
3.2. Energy associated with inactivation
The total heating demand of each reactor has been divided by
the expected pathogen inactivation performance to show the
relative heating demands per log inactivation, Table 2. Total
heat demand is the sum of energy to heat the sludge up to the
digester temperature and the energy required to overcome
heat losses from the digester to maintain the desired
temperature. Due to the high inactivation rates at thermo-
philic temperatures, and the shorter residence times,
increasing the temperature decreases the amount of heating
energy required per log removal. Rankings of heat demand per
log removal are the following: MAD > TAD > TPAD>>60 and
70 �C pretreatment plus MAD.
Net energy output (kWhr/metric ton) is defined as the
amount of usable energy produced in biogas minus the total
heat demand. Each digestion configuration produces more
Temperature (°C)
50 55 60 70
Lo
g R
ed
uctio
n in
V
iab
le C
on
cen
tratio
n
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Fig. 3 e Log reduction of viable E. coli as determined by CTC
staining after batch temperature treatment at residence
times corresponding to w4 log loss of cultivability. Error
bars represent standard error of three independent
experiments.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 84764
energy than it consumes, and generally the amounts of energy
produced are similar across all configurations, with energy
produced in the most productive configuration only 19%
greater than the least (Fig. 4). Heating up sludge and heat
losses account for approximately 25% (range 19%e32%) of the
total energy produced in these digesters. The batch pretreat-
ment configurations produce themost net energywith both 60
and 70 �C pretreatment variations producing about 120 kWh
per wet metric ton of treated sludge.
4. Discussion
The results of this study reveal two important concepts for
operating anaerobic digesters to produce a pathogen-free,
sustainable biosolids product. First, batch temperature inac-
tivation studies revealed the dramatic increase in inactivation
potential of operating a digester at or above 60 �C. Second, thissignificantly greater pathogen reduction can be achieved
without a decrease in digester net energy production. The
Table 2 e Inactivation performance efficiency expressed as thesludge for a given reactor configuration divided by the log remconfiguration. Values for E. coli and E. faecalis batch plus MADestimates for inactivation rate coefficients and therefore prese
Configuration Heating Energy Demand(kWh/wet metric ton treated sludge)
MAD 27
TAD 50 42
TAD 55 47
TPAD 50 37
TPAD 55 39
60 batch þ MAD 31
70 batch þ MAD 29
information presented here demonstrates the feasibility and
the sustainability advantages of operating anaerobic digesters
at increased temperatures. This work is only an initial step.
Implementation at the full-scale must involve comprehensive
pilot testing and operational experience to ensure all chal-
lenges of digester performance (e.g. VS destruction, limited
foaming, inactivation of multiple types of human pathogens,
etc.) are met.
4.1. Inactivation kinetics
The major concern surrounding land applying class B
biosolids is exposure of workers and nearby residents to
infectious pathogens (NRC, 2002). Currently 39 of 50 U.S. states
have local or statewide restrictions on land application
(Beecher et al., 2007). Restrictions adopted typically include
the use of buffer zones between biosolids-applied land and
residential areas. The value of using set-back distances for
risk reduction however, is limited as aerosol transport studies
suggest that for most set-back distances (usually less than
50 m), there is less than 1 log reduction in infectious pathogen
exposure (Low et al., 2007). Multiple log reductions in path-
ogen content and potential risk, therefore, must be accom-
plished during sludge stabilization.
Temperatures above 55 �C have traditionally not been
considered in anaerobic digestion. Exceeding 55 �C in single
stage digesters may cause an imbalance between aceto-
genesis and methanogenesis and lead to instability or
digester failure. Incorporating 60 or 70 �C temperatures in the
first phase of multi-phase treatment, or as a batch-
pretreatment step, expands the range of operating tempera-
tures without negatively impacting process stability or solids
conversion. This study demonstrates a sharp increase in
bacterial first-order inactivation rate coefficients in pure
culture batch reactors at temperatures of 60 �C and above.
Such behavior is consistent with the onset of permanent
ribosome damage in E. coli occurring at temperatures in the
vicinity of 60 �C as determined by differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC) (Lee and Kaletunc, 2002; Mackey et al.,
1993). Unlike temperatures above 60 �C, DSC plots at 37, 50
and 55 �C do not reveal permanent conformational changes
in the structure of the cell, which would indicate effective
and permanent inactivation (Lee and Kaletunc, 2002; Mackey
demand for heating energy (kWh) per wet ton of treatedoval calculated for each pathogen indicator in that reactorconfigurations at 60 and 70 �C are based on conservativented here as upper bounds.
Heating Energy Demand to Achieve 1 log ExpectedInactivation (kWh/wet metric ton treated)
E. coli E. faecalis MS-2
24 17 39
15 16 19
14 14 16
11 10. 16
10 8.7 11
< 0.1 < 0.1 2.2
< 0.0001 < 0.0001 1.7
Treatment Scheme
MAD TAD 50 TAD 55 TPAD 50 TPAD 55 60+MAD 70+MAD
En
erg
y C
osts an
d B
en
efits
(k
Wh
p
er m
etric
to
n tre
ate
d s
lu
dg
e)
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
Heat-up Cost
Heat Loss Cost
Biogas Value
Net Energy
Fig. 4 e Energy required and production per wet metric ton of treated sludge for various treatment schemes. Heat-up
requirement refers to the initial heating to bring the sludge up to temperature in the first or only phase of the digester. Heat
loss refers to heat energy lost from the digester or digester phases which must be replaced. Biogas production is expressed
as heat energy produced and reflects losses for combustion efficiency and moisture removal.
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 8 4765
et al., 1991, 1993). Lower inactivation rates and documented
full-scale complications with VBNC behavior at 50 or 55 �Care likely caused by the absence of a true bacterial inactiva-
tion mechanism. The differences between the culturability
loss and viability loss (Fig. 3) at temperatures below 60 �Csuggests that E. coli treated in this temperature range may be
more prone to VBNC and reactivation behavior previously
observed in full-scale, thermophilic digesters. Loss of viability
was clearly below the maximum observable loss (3.7 log) for
50 (0.76 log) and 55 �C (1.31 log) temperatures. At 60 �C, theexposure time which causes a 4 log reduction in E. coli cul-
turability corresponds to a 2.14 log loss in viability, which is
also significantly less than the 3.7 log reduction in the auto-
claved control. The threshold for permanent ribosomal
damage in E. coli is approximately 60 �C. It is possible that the
variation in this value, or variation in experiment placed the
bacteria just below this lethal threshold. Experiments at 70 �Care more certainly lethal in terms of permanent ribosomal
damage, but due to the very rapid inactivation (4 log loss of
culturability in 16 s) the higher variation between replicates
at this temperature can likely be attributed to experimental
imprecision. The useful range of CTC staining is limited by
minimum detection limits of microscopy and non-specific
interactions between the stain and high concentrations of
inactivated cells. The maximum CTC-derived log reduction in
viability observed was 3.7 log in an autoclaved negative
control. While further investigation using different types of
organisms is necessary to confirm these effects, this work
does suggest that digestion or treatment above 60 �C provides
some advantage for reducing potential coliform reactivation.
Particular attention should be paid to exactly where the
threshold of permanent ribosomal damage falls for bacteria
of concern. Finally, the sharp inactivation rate increase in
bacteria at 60 �C was not observed in MS-2 phage, which does
not contain ribosomes. The greater resistance to thermal
inactivation also supports the use of MS-2 or coliphages as
a more conservative pathogen inactivation indicator than
fecal coliforms. Additionally, the inactivation rate coeffi-
cients observed for MS-2 are either similar or more resistant
to heat inactivation than the rate coefficients reported for
Ascaris suum (Aitken et al., 2005; Popat et al., 2010).
The relationship between inactivation rate constant and
digester temperature has also been investigated with Arrhe-
nius plots for each indicator organism, and is presented in the
Supplementary Data Figure S-4. The Arrhenius plot for MS-2
displays linearity through the entire temperature range
(25e70 �C). This indicates that the activation energy barrier for
MS-2 inactivation is constant through this temperature range,
and dominated by a single mechanism, likely protein dena-
turation. Arrhenius plots for E. coli and E. faecalis however,
show a linear region at lower temperatures and then amarked
increase at temperatures beyond 55 �C. This behavior
supports the conclusion that a threshold temperature exists
in bacteria whereby vital proteins or ribosomes become
completely and irreversibly denatured. For the important
indicators considered here, this temperature is above 55 �C.The shape of these Arrhenius plots is also consistent with the
markedly increased loss of bacteria viability observed above
60 �C (Fig. 3).
The log inactivation projections presented here for
common thermophilic and mesophilic temperatures are
consistent with previous bench and full-scale inactivation
observations. First-order inactivation rate coefficients for E.
coli, E. faecalis and MS-2 are similar to previously reported
values in several studies, conducted in water or manure, at
temperatures ranging from 35 to 60 �C (Aitken et al., 2007;
Nappier et al., 2006; Olsen and Larsen, 1987; Spinks et al.,
2006). Additionally, observations in full-scale sludge digester
systems for fecal coliforms have similarly demonstrated 1 to 2
log reductions in MAD, 3-4 log in TAD or TPAD and compete
inactivation by pasteurization at 70 �C (Bagge et al., 2005;
Sidhu and Toze, 2009; Viau and Peccia, 2009b).
4.2. Comparing energy efficiencies between digesterconfigurations
An energy balance for each digester configuration is domi-
nated by the value of biogas produced. This assessment
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 84766
agrees with previous modeling studies that have suggested
net energy gains can be achieved by adding 70 �C pretreat-
ment steps at 1e5 day residence times (Bolzonella et al., 2007;
Lu et al., 2008). Energy requirements for heating consume
between 19 and 32% of this biogas value depending on the
reactor configuration. While no optimized energy balance
comparing thermophilic and mesophilic digestion conditions
has been published, our estimate of MAD heating require-
ments consuming 21% of biogas energy production (30% if
losses associated with heat recovery are neglected) compares
well with the previously published 35% for a MAD system
which neglects the potential for process heat recovery
(Lubken et al., 2007). These similarities and the fact that the
heating requirement and biogas models are well accepted for
estimating digester performance suggest that our model
provided heating and biogas production in the ranges that
are observed in full-scale practice and is useful for making
comparisons between digester configurations.
All 7 digestion configurations analyzed produce compa-
rable amounts of net energy per unit of treated sludge,
which indicates that 60 or 70 �C pretreatment can be
implemented without forfeiting energy production. While
this result is not intuitive, there are two reasons for why
high temperature digestion can be achieved without sacri-
ficing energy output. First, the heating costs in a reactor are
a combination of the heat input to bring the sludge up to the
correct temperature and the additional heat needed to
compensate for heat losses to the environment. Increasing
the reactor temperature increases the required initial heat
input as well as the rate of heat loss. However this effect is
mitigated by the dramatic reduction in residence times and
reactors sizes used at higher temperatures due to more
rapid inactivation. Secondly, our model incorporates
increases in biogas energy yield (based on 7% increase in
total VS destruction over MAD alone) for configurations
incorporating 50, 55, 60 or 70 �C treatment. Operating single
phase digesters at thermophilic temperatures or the pres-
ence of an initial thermophilic phase typically improves
hydrolysis and increases the bioavailability of digestible
material (Bolzonella et al., 2007; Ferrer et al., 2008; Lu et al.,
2008). A representative increase of 7% in total VS conversion
for thermophilic TPAD treatment has been noted in full-
scale digesters relative to MAD treatment alone (Shimp
et al., 2003). Slightly higher 9 and 10% increases have been
observed in bench-scale testing for 90 min of 60 �Cpretreatment (Salsabil et al., 2010) and short residence time
(2 day) TPAD systems (Ge et al., 2010) respectively, each
relative to MAD treatment alone.
Though not knowing the specific increase in biogas
production due to each pretreatment regime introduces some
model uncertainty, the impact on this uncertainty is minimal.
If our model did not include an increase in biogas production
for higher temperature treatments, the decrease in net energy
associated with adding pretreatment to MAD would only be
a loss of 1% at 70 �C or 3% at 60 �C, which does not impact our
broader conclusions about relative net energy production
between thermophilic and mesophilic processes. Net energy
calculations for all reactor configurations are also affected by
environmental assumptions, such as air, soil, and initial
sludge temperatures. However as the net energy calculations
shift across different environmental temperature ranges, the
relative difference in expected net energy between our reactor
configurations of interest only differs by 1 or 2 percent from
the relationship expressed in Fig. 4.
5. Conclusion
Traditionally, anaerobic digestion has been designed and
optimized with the goals of increased gas production and
solids destruction. Optimizing for the inactivation of patho-
gens has been given little attention. The results presented here
describe the potential for significantly greater inactivation of
bacterial and viral pathogens in biosolids and demonstrate
that it is possible to do so while working within currently
available configurations andwithout increases in energy costs.
� The temperature-based inactivation rates observed in batch
reactors demonstrate a dramatic increase in pathogen
destruction potential when a 60 or 70 �C phase is included.
At 60 �C, inactivation rates doubled in MS-2 phage and
increased 2 orders of magnitude for enteric bacteria surro-
gates over rates for the more common 50 to 55 �C thermo-
philic conditions. More dramatic increases in inactivation
rates were achieved at 70 �C. Thermal treatment of E. coli to
produce w4 logs of culturable inactivation demonstrated
that at temperatures less than 70 �C, the loss of cell viability
was not commensurate to the loss of culturability.
� Although significantly larger reductions in pathogen indi-
cators are observed in the high temperature regimes, the net
energy production in the 60 or 70 �C pretreatment systems
was not significantly different than the net energy produced
in more conventional systems that operate in mesophilic
(w37 �C) and thermophilic (50e55 �C) ranges.
Appendix. Supplementary material
Supplementary data related to this article can be found online
at doi:10.1016/j.jorganchem.2011.03.010.
r e f e r e n c e s
Aitken, M.D., Sobsey, M.D., Blauth, K.E., Shehee, M., Crunk, P.L.,Walters, G.W., 2005. Inactivation ofAscaris suum and poliovirusinbiosolids under thermophilic anaerobic digestion conditions.Environmental Science & Technology 39 (15), 5804e5809.
Aitken, M.D., Sobsey, M.D., Van Abel, N.A., Blauth, K.E.,Singleton, D.R., Crunk, P.L., Nichols, C., Walters, G.W.,Schneider, M., 2007. Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7during thermophilic anaerobic digestion of manure from dairycattle. Water Research 41 (8), 1659e1666.
APHA, AWWA, WEF, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examinationof Water and Wastewater. D.C, Washington.
Bagge, E., Sahlstrom, L., Albihn, A., 2005. The effect of hygienictreatment on the microbial flora of biowaste at biogas plants.Water Research 39 (20), 4879e4886.
Beecher, N., Crawford, K., Goldstein, N., Kester, G., Lono-Batura, M., Dziezyk, E., 2007. A National Biosolids Regulation,
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 8 4767
Quality, End Use & Disposal Survey. North East Biosolids andResiduals Association.
Bekkering, J., Broekhuis, A.A., van Gemert, W.J.T., 2010.Optimisation of a green gas supply chain - a review.Bioresource Technology 101 (2), 450e456.
Bolzonella, D., Pavan, P., Zanette, M., Cecchi, F., 2007. Two-phaseanaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: effect of anextreme thermophilic prefermentation. Industrial andEngineering Chemistry Research 46 (21), 6650e6655.
Evanylo, G., Sherony, C., Spargo, J., Starner, D., Brosius, M.,Haering, K., 2008. Soil and water environmental effects offertilizer-, manure-, and compost-based fertility practices inan organic vegetable cropping system. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment 127 (1e2), 50e58.
Ferrer, I., Ponsa, S., Vazquez, F., Font, X., 2008. Increasing biogasproduction by thermal (70 �C) sludge pre-treatment prior tothermophilic anaerobic digestion. Biochemical EngineeringJournal 42 (2), 186e192.
Funderburg, S.W., Sorber, C.A., 1985. Coliphages as indicators ofenteric viruses in activated sludge. Water Research 19 (5),547e555.
Gantzer, C., Gaspard, P., Galvez, L., Huyard, A., Dumouthier, N.,Schwartzbrod, J., 2001. Monitoring of bacterial andparasitological contamination during various treatment ofsludge. Water Research 35 (16), 3763e3770.
Ge, H., Jensen, P.D., Batstone, D.J., 2010. Pre-treatmentmechanisms during thermophilic-mesophilic temperaturephased anaerobic digestion of primary sludge. Water Research44 (1), 123e130.
Greer, D., 2007. Financing an anaerobic digester. BioCycle 48 (12),44e48.
Guzman, C., Jofre, J., Montemayor, M., Lucena, F., 2007.Occurrence and levels of indicators and selected pathogens indifferent sludges and biosolids. Journal of AppliedMicrobiology 103 (6), 2420e2429.
Havelaar, A.H., Van Olphen, M., Drost, Y.C., 1993. F-specific RNAbacteriophages are adequate model organisms for entericviruses in fresh water. Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology 59 (9), 2956e2962.
Higgins, M.J., Chen, Y.C., Murthy, S.N., Hendrickson, D., Farrel, J.,Schafer, P., 2007. Reactivation and growth of non-culturableindicator bacteria in anaerobically digested biosolids aftercentrifuge dewatering. Water Research 41 (3), 665e673.
Hobbie, J.E., Daley, R.J., Jasper, S., 1977. Use of nuclepore filters forcounting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Applied andEnvironmental Microbiology 33 (5), 1225e1228.
Kepp, U., Machenbach, I., Weisz, N., Solheim, O.E., 2000.Enhanced stabilisation of sewage sludge through thermalhydrolysis three years of experience with full scale plant.Water Science & Technology, 89e96.
Khaleel, R., Reddy, K.R., Overcash, M.R., 1981. Changes in soilphysical properties due to organic waste applications:a review. Journal of Environmental Quality 10 (2), 133e141.
Krich, K., Augenstein, D., Batmale, J., Benemann, J., Rutledge, B.,Salour, D., 2005. Biomethane from Dairy Waste: a Sourcebookfor the Production and Use of Renewable Natural Gas inCalifornia (Prepared for Western United Dairymen).
Le, M.S., Mayhew, M.E., Back, P.A., 2002. Effectiveness ofsecondary digesters as a pathogen controller in winter. Waterand Environment Journal 16 (4), 292e295.
Lee, J., Kaletunc, G., 2002. Evaluation of the heat inactivation ofEscherichia coli and Lactobacillus plantarum by differentialscanning calorimetry. Applied and EnvironmentalMicrobiology 68 (11), 5379e5386.
Lewis, D., Gattie, D.K., 2002. Pathogen risks from applying sewagesludge to land. Environmental Science and Technology 36 (13),286Ae293A.
Low, S.-Y., Baertsch, C., Paez-Rubio, T., Kucharski, M., Peccia, J.,2007. Off-site exposure to respirable aerosols produced during
the disk incorporation of class B biosolids. Journal ofEnvironmental Engineering 133, 897e994.
Lu, J., Gavala, H.N., Skiadas, I.V., Mladenovska, Z., Ahring, B.K.,2008. Improving anaerobic sewage sludge digestion byimplementation of a hyper-thermophilic prehydrolysisstep. Journal of Environmental Management 88 (4),881e889.
Lubken, M., Wichern, M., Schlattmann, M., Gronauer, A., Horn, H.,2007. Modelling the energy balance of an anaerobic digesterfed with cattle manure and renewable energy crops. WaterResearch 41 (18), 4085e4096.
Mackey, B.M., Miles, C.A., Parsons, S.E., Seymour, D.A., 1991.Thermal-denaturation of whole cells and cell components ofEscherichia coli examined by differential scanning calorimetry.Journal of General Microbiology 137, 2361e2374.
Mackey, B.M., Miles, C.A., Seymour, D.A., Parsons, S.E., 1993.Thermal denaturation and loss of viability in Escherichia coliand Bacillus stearothermophilus. Letters in Applied Microbiology16 (2), 56e58.
Metcalf and Eddy, 2003. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment andReuse. Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
Nappier, S.P., Aitken, M.D., Sobsey, M.D., 2006. Male-specificcoliphages as indicators of thermal inactivation of pathogensin biosolids. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72 (4),2471e2475.
NRC, 2002. Biosolids Applied to Land: Advancing Standards andPractices. National Research Council of the NationalAcademies, Washington D.C.
Olsen, J.E., Larsen, H.E., 1987. Bacterial decimation times inanaerobic digestions of animal slurries. Biological Wastes 21(3), 153e168.
Pedersen, D.C., 1981. Density Levels of Pathogenic Organisms inMunicipal Wastewater Sludge: a Literature Review. U.S. EPAMunicipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati,OH. EPA 600-2-81-170.
Perry, R.H., Green, D.W., 1984. Perry’s Chemical Engineers’Handbook. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
Popat, S.C., Yates, M.V., Deshusses, M.A., 2010. Kinetics ofinactivation of indicator pathogens during thermophilicanaerobic digestion. Water Research 44 (20), 5965e5972.
Qi, Y., Dentel, S.K., Herson, D.S., 2007. Increases in fecal coliformbacteria resulting from centrifugal dewatering of digestedbiosolids. Water Research 41 (3), 571e580.
Rittmann, B.E., McCarty, P.L., 2001. Environmental Biotechnology:Principles and Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sahlstrom, L., Aspan, A., Bagge, E., Danielsson-Tham, M.-L.,Albihn, A., 2004. Bacterial pathogen incidences in sludge fromSwedish sewage treatment plants. Water Research 38,1989e1994.
Salsabil, M.R., Laurent, J., Casellas, M., Dagot, C., 2010. Techno-economic evaluation of thermal treatment, ozonation andsonication for the reduction of wastewater biomass volumebefore aerobic or anaerobic digestion. Journal of HazardousMaterials 174 (1e3), 323e333.
Shimp, G.F., Rowan, J.M., Long, D.W., Santha, H., 2003. Anaerobicdigestion. retooling an old process to meet a ‘Class A’objective. Water Environment and Technology 15 (5), 45e49.
Sidhu, J.P.S., Toze, S.G., 2009. Human pathogens and theirindicators in biosolids: a literature review. EnvironmentInternational 35 (1), 187e201.
Spinks, A.T., Dunstan, R.H., Harrison, T., Coombes, P., Kuczera, G.,2006. Thermal inactivation of water-borne pathogenic andindicator bacteria at sub-boiling temperatures. WaterResearch 40 (6), 1326e1332.
USEPA, 1979. Process Design Manual Sludge Treatment andDisposal. U.S. EPA Office of Research and Development,Washington, D.C. EPA 625-1-79-011.
USEPA, 1994. Land Aplication of Sewage Sludge. A Guide for LandAppliers on the Requirements of the Federal Standard for the
wat e r r e s e a r c h 4 5 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 4 7 5 8e4 7 6 84768
Use or Disposal of Sweage Sludge 40 CFR Part 503, U.S. EPAOffice of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance,Washington, D.C EPA 831-B-93002b.
USEPA, 1999. Environmental Regulations and Technology: Controlof Pathogens and Vector Attraction in Sewage Sludge. U.S. EPAOffice of Research and Development, Washington, D.C. EPA625-R-92013.
USEPA, 2001. Method 1601: Male-specific (Fþ) and SomaticColiphage in Water by Two-Step Enrichment Proceedure. U.S.EPA Office of Water, Washington, D.C. EPA 821-R-01e030.
USEPA, 2002. Method 1600: Enterococci in Water by MembraneFiltration Using Membrane-Enterococcus Indoxyl-b-D-
Glucoside Agar (MEI). U.S. EPA Office of Water, Washington,D.C. EPA 821-R-02e022.
Viau, E., Peccia, J., 2009a. Evaluation of the enterococci indicatorin biosolids using culture-based and quantitative PCR assays.Water Research 43 (19), 4878.
Viau, E., Peccia, J., 2009b. A survey of wastewater indicators andhuman pathogen genomes in biosolids produced by class Aand class B stabilization treatments. Applied andEnviornmental Microbiology 75, 164e174.
Zupancic, G.D., Ros, M., 2003. Heat and energy requirements inthermophilic anaerobic sludge digestion. Renewable Energy 28(14), 2255e2267.