neonatal ecmo study of temperature nest. basic ecmo circuit
TRANSCRIPT
Neonatal ECMO Study of Temperature
NEST
Basic ECMO circuit
ECMO Study follow-up at four
ECMO93
Conventional92
Deaths31
Deaths54
Lost to follow-up 1
Lost to follow-up 3
Assessed at four61
Assessed at four35
Recruited185
Outcome classification
Normal
Impairment No functional loss
Disability
Mild Little or no support
Moderate Needs aids or assistance
Severe Constant supervision
Results – Cognitive
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
85+ 84 - 70 69 - 50 < 50
General Conceptual Ability Score
ECMO
Conventional
Results – Cognitive
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
normal impaired milddisability
moderatedisability
severedisability
%
ECMO
Conventional
Results - Neuromotor
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
normal impaired milddisability
moderatedisability
severedisability
%
ECMO
Conventional
Results – General health
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
normal impaired milddisability
moderatedisability
severedisability
%
ECMO
Conventional
Results – Behaviour
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
normal impaired milddisability
moderatedisability
severedisability
%
ECMO
Conventional
Results – Hearing
0
20
40
60
80
100
normal impaired milddisability
moderatedisability
severedisability
%
ECMO
Conventional
Outcome at four years of age
ECMO
60 %
Conventional
35 %
Normal 12 20 4 11
Impairment 18 30 9 26
Mild disability 18 30 12 34
Moderate disability 9 15 10 29
Severe disability 3 5 0
Results – Overall
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
normal impaired milddisability
moderatedisability
severedisability
%
ECMO
Conventional
Overall outcome
0102030405060708090
100
ECMO Conventional
n
LostNo disabilityMod/mild disabilitySevere disabilityDied
“Concept”
• Infants receiving ECMO represent a high risk group for cerebral injury
• Mild hypothermia appears to be a promising means of offering neuroprotection following hypoxic ischaemic injury
Pilot Study ProgressStage I: 1998 -1999
Twenty neonates recruited
Cooled for first 12 hours of ECMO
No significant problems found.
Stage II: 2000 -2001Twenty neonates recruited
Cooled for the first 24 hours of ECMO
Stage III: 2001Five neonates recruited
Cooled to 340c core temperature for the
first 48 hours of ECMO
Methods
25 consecutive neonates referred for ECMO (n = 5 per group)
Group 1 (Control): Core temp at 370c for five days
Group 2: 360c for 24 hours
Group 3: 350c for 24 hours
Group 4: 340c for 24 hours
Group 5: 340c for 48 hours
MethodProtocol: Blood Sampling Points
BaselineBaseline 2 H2 H 12 H12 H 24 H 48 H48 H Day 3Day 3 Day 4Day 4 Day 5Day 5
ECMO Cannulation (VA or VV-DLC)ECMO Cannulation (VA or VV-DLC)
CoolingCooling 37 37 00CC
Infants were carefully assessed clinically and biologicallyInfants were carefully assessed clinically and biologically
Blood Samples were drawn from the ECMO circuit Blood Samples were drawn from the ECMO circuit sampling port at the times shownsampling port at the times shown
36 H
Serum AssaysCytokines: IL6 and IL8
Molecular Markers of Coagulation: Thrombin-Antithrombin III, Antithrombin III, Plasmin 2 plasminogen
Complement: C3a
Measurements
Measurements
Heparin and Platelet Transfusion Requirements
Oxygenator resistance: calculated 2, 12 and 24 hourly thereafter using the formula:
Pre-oxygenator pressure - post-oxygenator pressure(mmHg)
circuit blood flow (ml/min)
Group 1 (370C)
Group 2 (360C for 24 hours)
Group 3 (350C for 24 hours)
Group 4 (340C for 24 hours)
Group 5 (340C for 48 hours)
p*
Gestation in weeks
40
(33,40)
40
(38,40)
40
(38,41)
38
(37,40)
40
(39,41)
0.2 Age at ECMO
in hours 24
(22,37)
30
(25,432)
24
(16,94)
50
(6,384)
22
(12,26)
0.1 Birth weight
(Kg) 2.6
(2.4,3.7)
3.7
(3.2, 4.3)
3.4
(2.8-4.7)
3.7
(2.7-4.4)
3.4
(3.1-4.3)
0.4 Oxygenation
Index at Referral 50
(35-70)
48
(27-89)
40
(28-90)
31
(20-52)
40
(31-55)
0.5 Primary diagnoses
MAS/PPHN 3 3 4 2 4
Sepsis 1 1 1
RDS 1 1
CDH
1 1
TAPVD †
1
Inborn Error of Metabolism ‡
1
Summary of Demographic Data for Study Groups
*Comparison of groups by Kruskal-Wallis test (df = 4) values are median (range)
Median Group Core Temperature During Study Period
*Comparing groups 1-5, median rectal temperature SD at 24 hours (Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared = 23.3, df = 4, p<0.001)
Time on ECMO (hours)
120100806040200
Re
cta
l Te
mp
era
ture
('C
)37.5
37.0
36.5
36.0
35.5
35.0
34.5
34.0
33.5
Study Group
5
4
3
2
1*
Number of Patients
Group 1 (370C)
Group 2 (360C for 24 hrs)
Group 3 (350C for 24 hrs)
Group 4 (340C for
24 hrs)
Group 5 (340C for 48 hrs)
2 p
Venovenous Cannulation
4
3
5
3
5
Median (range) time on ECMO in hours *
80 (68-176)
128 (60-451)
70 (43-122)
97 (60-218)
96 (62-164)
- 3.1
0.5
Bleeding
0 1† 0 0 0
Circuit Dysfunction
0
0
0
0
0
No of Deaths 0 1 0 3 0
Progress and Complications During the Study
* Comparison of groups by Kruskal-Wallis (df = 4)† Bleeding at cannula site due to heparin bolus
Group 1 (370C)
Group 2 (360C for 24 hours)
Group 3 (350C for 24 hours)
Group 4 (340C for 24 hours)
Group 5 (340C for 48 hours)
Heart rate prior to cooling (beats/minute)
165 (150-176)
170 (132-188)
149 (130-214)
165 (130-201)
168 (126-178)
Heart rate during cooling (beats/minute)
136* (85-200)
129 (78-188)
103 (68-214)
127 (74-201)
108 (82-187)
MABP during cooling (mmHg) MABP when rewarmed (mmHg)
52* (34-83) 52 (38-75)
56 (36-90) 59 (36-81)
54 (36-82) 53 (35-86)
51 (27-77) 53 (39-76)
50 (33-87) 52 (38-73)
Cardiovascular Data During Cooling and Rewarming
*Denotes patients not cooled Values are median (range)
Results
No systemic difference between groups for:
– Molecular markers of coagulation– Complement C3a– Cytokines IL6 and IL8– Platelet transfusion requirements– Oygenator resistance
Time on ECMO (hours)
120967248240
IL6
(m
cg/L
)400
300
200
100
0
Group
5
4
3
2
1
Mean IL6 (Temperature Groups)
Time on ECMO (hours)
120967248240
Com
plem
ent
(C3a
) n
g/m
l
3000
2000
1000
0
Group
5
4
3
2
1
Mean C3a (Temperature Groups)
Conclusions
• Applying mild hypothermia (340C) for 24 or 48 hours of neonatal ECMO appears feasible and safe
• No major complications related to mild hypothermia were observed in this study.
The next steps
A randomised controlled trial
Trial outline
• Research question to be addressed: Does cooling neonates (neonate: less than or equal to 28 days of age) requiring ECMO to 34oC for the first 48 to 72 hours of their ECMO run result in improved Bayley scores at 2 years of age?
• Trial design: Pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial.
Trial outline
• Eligibility – Meeting standard ECMO criteria but no
congenital diaphragmatic hernias and no post cardiac ECMO
Trial outline
• Blinding
• Randomisation
• Consent
Trial outline
• Minimisation by approach to ECMO (VV or VA).
Trial outline
• ECMO management
• Organisation
Trial outline
• Trial end points
– Primary outcome: MDI of the Bayley scales (34) at age of 2 years (24 - 27 months).
– Note: Where the MDI cannot be assessed because of severe disability or death, a score of either 40 or 0 will be recorded respectively.
Trial outline
Secondary outcomes:• Death• Outcome of a structured neurological
assessment • Results of simple questionnaire completed by
parents about their child’s health at two years of age.
• PDI of the Bayley scales• Visuospatial assessment• Testers rating of child behaviour
Assumed mean Bayley scores of the two arms
Assumed SD of Bayley scores
Significance
Power to detect difference between the two arms
Sample size Number needed to be recruited assuming 80%survival to 2 years
85 & 95 15 5% 90 94 118
85 & 95 10 5% 90 42 53
90 & 95 10 5% 90 168 210
Trial Size
Analysis
• Intention-to-treat analysis
• Pre specified secondary analyses by disease severity and diagnosis
Other issues
• Timescale
• aEEG
• MRI
Thank you