nayana gautam and mrinal kumar das - arxiv · phenomenologyofkevscalesterileneutrinodarkmatterwiths...

Phenomenology of keV scale sterile neutrino dark matter with S4

flavor symmetry

Nayana Gautam1, ∗ and Mrinal Kumar Das1, †

1Department of Physics, Tezpur University, Tezpur - 784028, India

AbstractWe study the possibility of simultaneously addressing neutrino phenomenology and the dark

matter in the framework of inverse seesaw. The model is the extension of the standard model by

the addition of two right handed neutrinos and three sterile fermions which leads to a light sterile

state with the mass in the keV range along with three light active neutrino states. The lightest sterile

neutrino can account for a feasible dark matter(DM) candidate. We present a S4 flavor symmetric

model which is further augmented by Z4×Z3 symmetry to constrain the Yukawa Lagrangian. The

structures of the mass matrices involved in inverse seesaw within the S4 framework naturally give

rise to correct neutrino mass matrix with non-zero reactor mixing angle θ13. In this framework,

we conduct a detailed numerical analysis both for normal hierarchy as well as inverted hierarchy

to obtain dark matter mass and DM-active mixing which are the key factors for considering sterile

neutrino as a viable dark matter candidate. We constrain the parameter space of the model from

the latest cosmological bounds on the mass of the dark matter and DM-active mixing.

PACS numbers: 12.60.-i,14.60.Pq,14.60.St

∗Electronic address: [email protected]†Electronic address: [email protected]

1

arX

iv:1

904.

1066

2v3

[he

p-ph

] 1

9 D

ec 2

019

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

I. INTRODUCTION

The discovery of neutrino oscillations and experimental evidences on neutrino masses and

mixing provide reasons to expect physics beyond standard model. Standard model, being

the most successful scenario in particle physics, can explain the mass of all the particles

except neutrino through the concept of interaction of the particles with Higgs boson. Neu-

trinos remain massless because of the absence of right handed counter part of it in standard

model (SM). The conspicuous discoveries of atmospheric and solar neutrino oscillations by

the Super-Kamioka Neutrino Detection Experiment(Super-Kamiokande)[1]and the Sudbury

Neutrino Observatory (SNO)[2, 3], shortly thereafter confirmed by the Kamioka Liquid Scin-

tillator Antineutrino Detector (KamLAND)[4] experiment provided evidence for the neutrino

flavor oscillation and massive nature of neutrinos. Some pioneer work on neutrino masses

and mixing can be found in [5–10]. In contradiction to the huge achievements in determining

the neutrino oscillation parameters in solar, atmospheric, reactor and accelerator neutrino

experiments[11–15], many important issues related to neutrino physics are yet not solved.

Among these open questions, absolute mass scale of the neutrinos, exact nature of it (Majo-

rana or Dirac), hierarchical pattern of the mass spectrum(Normal or Inverted), leptonic CP

violation are important. The present status of different neutrino parameters can be found in

global fit neutrino oscillation data[16, 17] which is summarised in table III . It is observable

from the data that the leptonic mixing are much larger than the mixing in the quark sector

which creates another puzzle [18]. All these problems appeal for a coherent and successful

framework beyond standard model(BSM).

Although the results of atmospheric, solar and long-baseline experiments are well-fitted

within the framework of three neutrino mixing, there are some current experiments like

LSND [19],MINOS [12] etc which suggest the existence of another fourth massive neu-

trino,usually called as sterile. LSND observed an excess of (νe) in their study of decays

of positively charged muons at rest in the process µ+ −→ e+ + νe + νµ while in MiniBooNE

with a νµ(νµ) beam having neutrino energy of 600(400) MeV, observed an excess of νe(νe)

with a significance of about 4.8 standard deviations [20, 21] . The results informed that

muon anti-neutrinos (νµ) converts into electron anti- neutrinos (νe) over a distance that is

too short for conventional neutrino oscillations to occur. They reported that this oscillation

could be explained by incorporating at least one additional neutrino. Muon anti neutrinos

2

(νµ) could be morphed into a fourth state of neutrino which in turn converted to electron

anti neutrinos(νe). Again, anomalies in SAGE [22] and GALLEX [23] have provided a hint

towards the existence of fourth state of neutrinos. These additional states must relate to

right-handed neutrinos (RHN) for which bare mass terms are allowed by all symmetries i.e.

they should not be present in SU(2)L × U(1)Y interactions, hence are sterile [24]. Sterile

neutrino as its name indicates is stable and it has only gravitational interactions. It has no

charged or neutral current weak interactions except mixing with active neutrinos. Hence, the

subsistence of sterile neutrinos can have observable effects in astrophysical environments and

in cosmology. A natural way to produce sterile neutrinos is by their admixture to the active

neutrino sector [25].The only way to reveal the existence of sterile neutrinos in terrestrial

experiments is through the effects generated by their mixing with the active neutrinos[26].

The simplest way to incorporate mass to the neutrinos is the addition of right handed

(RH) neutrinos to the standard model by hand so that Higgs field can have Yukawa coupling

to the neutrinos also. But to explain the smallness of neutrino mass which is in sub-eV

range, the Yukawa coupling should be fine tuned to a quite unnatural value around 10−12 .

Several theoretical frameworks have been proposed in the last few decades to explain tiny

neutrino mass. Among all scenarios, a significant cornerstone for the theoretical research on

neutrino physics is the formulation of seesaw mechanism, which is classified into different

categories like Type I [27, 28], Type II [29], Type III [30, 31]and Inverse Seesaw(ISS) [32–

34]. In Type I seesaw, the SM is extended by the addition of SM singlet fermions usually

defined as right-handed(RH) neutrinos, that have Yukawa-type interactions with the SM

Higgs and left-handed doublets. The light neutrino mass matrix arising from this type of

seesaw is of the formMν ≈MdM−1RRM

Td , whereMd andMRR are Dirac and Majorana masses

respectively. Besides the SM particle content,the type II seesaw introduces an additional

SU(2)L triplet scalar field. Inverse seesaw requires the existence of extra singlet fermion to

provide rich neutrino phenomenology. In this formalism,the lightest neutrino mass matrix is

given byMν ≈Md(MT )−1µM−1MT

d ,whereMd is the Dirac mass term and µ is the Majorana

mass term for sterile, while M represents the lepton number conserving interaction between

right handed and sterile fermions. Neutrinos with sub-eV scale are obtained from Md at

electroweak scale,M at TeV scale and µ at keV scale. The beyond standard model(BSM)

physics is successful in explaining many unperceived problems in SM as well as some other

cosmological problems like baryon asymmetry of the universe(BAU) and particle nature of

3

dark matter (DM) etc. The baryon asymmetry can be generated naturally through the

decay of the RH neutrinos that exists in seesaw mechanism which is in consistent with the

cosmological observable constrained by Big bang Nucleosynthesis.

Again, another important open question in particle physics as well as cosmology is dark

matter(DM) and its properties. Cosmological and astrophysical measurements in different

context assure that the present Universe is composed of a mysterious,non-baryonic,non-

luminous matter,called dark matter [35, 36]. The evidence comes from the shape of cosmic

microwave background(CMB)power spectrum to cluster and galactic rotation curves and

gravitational lensing etc [37–39]. Inspite of these strong evidences for the presence of dark

matter(DM), the fundamental nature of dark matter i.e its origin, its constituents and

interactions are still unknown. According to the Planck Data , 26.8 % of the energy density

in the universe is composed of DM and the present dark matter abundance is reported as

[40]:

ΩDMh2 = 0.1187± 0.0017

Searching for the possible connection of this exciting cosmological problem with new

physics beyond standard model has been a great challenge to the physics community world-

wide. The important criteria to be fulfilled by a particle to be a good DM candidate can

be found in [41]. These requirements exclude all the SM particles from being DM candi-

date. This has motivated the particle physics community to study different possible BSM

frameworks which can give rise to the correct DM phenomenology and can also be tested at

several different experiments [42]. There are multifarious particles that have been proposed

as a remedy to the DM problem. A popular warm dark matter(WDM) candidate is sterile

neutrino, a right handed neutrino, singlet under the SM gauge symmetry having tiny mixing

with the SM neutrinos leading to a long lifetime [43, 44]. Even in the X-ray band, one of

the most studied candidates of dark matter is sterile neutrino [45, 46], which can radiatively

decay into an active neutrino and a mono energetic photon in the process N −→ ν + γ [47].

The production of sterile neutrino DM can be naturally achieved in the early universe via

a small mixing with active neutrinos [48]. Warm dark matters are composed of particles

having velocity dispersion between that of hot DM(HDM) and cold DM(CDM) particles.

The larger free streaming length of WDM, with respect to CDM, reduces the power at small

scales, suppressing the formation of small structures [49, 50]. In general, there are no theo-

retical limits on the number of sterile neutrinos that can exist, on their masses and mixing

4

with the active neutrinos [26]. Sterile neutrinos specially in keV scale can have a prominent

role in cosmology. Sterile neutrino is a neutral, massive particle and its lifetime can be

very long as explained in [51] . The fact that sterile neutrinos can be produced by their

admixture to the active neutrino sector leads to the conclusion that any reaction producing

active neutrinos can also produce sterile neutrinos as long as active-sterile mixing angles are

non-zero. This could produce enough sterile neutrinos to explain the observed amount of

DM [52]. However, to constitute the observed amount of DM, sterile neutrino in keV range

has some constraints which can be found in [52]. Cosmology predicts the range of viable

dark matter mass as 0.4keV . mDM . 50keV . The lower limit is set by Tremaine-Gunn

bound [53] while a DM candidate loses its stability above 50 keV [54, 55] Considering ad-

ditional observational constraints on the active sterile mixing, the Doodelson-Widrow(DW)

mechanism can account for atmost 50% of the total dark matter density today [56].

Although the origin of neutrino masses as well as leptonic mixing are not directly related

to the fundamental properties of DM, it is highly inspiring to look for a common framework

that can explain both the phenomena. Motivated by this, we have done a phenomenological

study on the light neutrino mass matrix in the framework of inverse seesaw (2,3)(ISS(2,3)) in

which the particle content of SM is extended by two right handed(RH) neutrinos and three

extra sterile fermions. The motivation for studying ISS(2,3) is that it is a possible way to

accommodate DM candidate within itself and also can yield correct neutrino phenomenology.

Moreover, unlike canonical seesaw models, the inverse seesaw can be a low scale framework

where the singlet heavy neutrinos can be at or below the TeV scale without any fine tuning of

Yukawa couplings [42]. The symmetry realization of the model is carried out using discrete

flavor symmetry S4. The model is further augmented by Z4 and Z3 group to avoid the

unnecessary interactions among the particles. We have constructed the matrices involved in

ISS in such a way that the µ − τ symmetry is broken in the resulting light neutrino mass

matrix to comply with the experimental evidence of non-zero reactor mixing angle [57]. We

have studied the DM phenomenology considering the lightest sterile neutrino involved in

ISS mechanism as a potential DM candidate. We have evaluated the model parameters and

then feed these parameters to the calculation of DM mass, DM-active mixing, relic density

and the decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino. Our model is in agreement with the limits

obtained from cosmology as well as astrophysics.

The paper is organized as follows. In section II, we briefly review the inverse seesaw

5

mechanism and inverse seesaw ISS (2,3) framework. In section III, we present the S4 flavor

symmetric model and the construction of different mass matrices in lepton sector. Section

IV is the discussion of dark mater production in ISS(2,3) framework. In section V, we briefly

mention the constraints on sterile neutrino dark matter. The detailed numerical analysis

and the results are discussed in section VI. Finally, we conclude in section VII.

II. INVERSE SEESAW FRAMEWORK : ISS(2,3)

As discussed in several earlier works, different seesaw mechanisms have eminent role

in generating tiny neutrino masses [27, 29, 30]. The inverse seesaw(ISS) incorporates an

interesting alternative to the conventional seesaw. Though it requires the extension of

Standard Model with extra singlet fermion,it has the advantage of lowering the mass scale

to TeV range,which may be probed at LHC and in future neutrino experiments. It aims at

explaining the smallness of one or more sterile neutrinos by the very same seesaw mechanism

that is behind small active neutrino masses. The particle content in the model extends

minimally that of the Standard Model, by the sequential addition of a pair of SU(2)×U(1)

singlet fermions. In addition to the right-handed neutrinos,characteristic of the standard

seesaw model, the inverse seesaw scheme requires gauge singlet neutrinos si [56]. The relevant

Lagrangian for the ISS is given as,

L = −1

2nTLCMnL + h.c

where C ≡ iγ2γ0 is the charge conjugation matrix and nL = (νL,α, νcR,i, sj)

T .Here,νL,α with

α = e,µ,τ are the SM left handed neutrino states and νcR,i(i = 1, νR) are right handed (RH)

neutrinos,while sj(j = 1, s) are sterile fermions. The neutrino mass matrix arising from the

type of Lagrangian is of the form :

M =

0 Md 0

MdT 0 MN

0 MTN µ

(1)

whereMd ,M and µ are complex matrices. The matrix µ represents the Majorana mass terms

for sterile fermions and the matrix M represents the lepton number conserving interactions

between right handed and new sterile fermions. Standard model neutrinos at sub-eV scale

6

are obtained fromMd at electroweak scale, M at TeV scale and µ at keV scale as explained in

many literatures [34, 58]. The dimension of the mass matrices in the model are(# represents

the number of flavors.)

dimensionMd = (#νL ×#νR)

dimensionM = (#νR ×#s)

dimensionµ = (#s×#s)

Block diagonalisation of the above mass matrix yields the effective light neutrino mass matrix

as:

Mν ≈MTd (MT

N)−1µM−1N Md (2)

Again, the full 8× 8 mass matrix can be diagolaised by using U as,

UTMU = Mdiag = diag(m1,m2....m8) (3)

In general, the inverse seesaw formula for light neutrino mass can generate a very general

structure of neutrino mass matrix. Since the leptonic mixing is found to have some specific

structure with large mixing angles, one can look for possible flavor symmetry origin of it. In

this context, non Abelian discrete flavor symmetries play crucial rule [59]. For the purpose

of the present work, we have used ISS(2,3) framework which is the extension of the SM by

the addition of two RH neutrinos and three additional sterile fermions as mentioned in [43].

The motivation for using this special type of inverse seesaw is that it can account for the

low energy neutrino data and also provides a viable dark matter candidate [56]. In this

framework, Md is a (3 × 2) matrix,M is a (2 × 3) matrix and µ is (3 × 3). The detailed

mechanism for the dark matter production and the generation of light neutrino mass in the

framework of ISS(2,3) will be discussed in the later sections. The mass model is realized

with the help of S4 discrete group. The model is further augmented by Z4 and Z3 group to

protect the unnecessary terms in the Lagrangian.

III. DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL

Symmetries play a crucial role in particle physics. Non-Abelian discrete flavor symmetries

have wide applications in particle physics as these are important tools for controlling the

flavor structures of the model [60, 61]. Discrete symmetries like AN ,SN ,ZN are widely used in

7

Field L lR NR H s φ φ′ φs φl

S4 31 31 2 11 31 32 31 11 11

SU(2)L 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1

Z4 1 1 1 +i +i −i −i −1 −i

Z3 ω2 1 1 1 ω ω ω ω ω

TABLE I: Fields and their respective transformations under the symmetry group of the model.

the context of model building in particle physics [62–67]. In the present work, the symmetry

realization of the structure of the mass matrices has been carried out using the discrete flavor

symmetry S4, which is a group of permutation of four objects, isomorphic to the symmetry

group of a cube. S4 has five irreducible representations with two singlets,one doublet and

two triples denoted by 11 , 12, 2, 31 and 32 respectively. The lepton doublet,charged lepton

singlet of the SM and sterile fermion in inverse seesaw model transform as triplet 31 of

S4 while the SM singlet neutrinos NR and SM Higgs doublet transform as 2 and 11 of S4

respectively. The product rules implemented in these representations are given in appendix

A . Further Z4×Z3 symmetry is imposed to get the desired mass matrix and to constrain the

non-desired interactions of the particles. The particle content and the charge assignments

are detailed in table I, where in addition to the lepton sector and to the SM Higgs, flavons

φ, φ′,φs, χ, χ′ have been introduced. The Yukawa Lagrangian for the charged leptons and

also for the neutrinos can be expressed as:

− L = LML + LMD + LM + LMS + h.c (4)

where,

LMD =y

ΛLNRHφ+

y′ΛLNRHφ

′, (5)

Λ is the cut-off scale. It is needed to lower the mass dimension to 4. Here, we need extra

scalar φ and φ′ with SM Higgs because S4 product between a doublet and triplet yields two

triplets and H is a S4 singlet, so we require another triplet scalar so that the total Lagrangian

remains singlet under S4.

LMS = ysssφs (6)

8

Field χ χ′

S4 32 31

SU(2)L 1 1

Z4 −i −i

Z3 ω2 ω2

TABLE II: New flavon fields with their respective transformations under the symmetry group of

the model.

LML is the Lagrangian for the charged leptons which can be written in terms of dimension

five operators as [68]

LML =ylΛLlRHφl (7)

The following flavon alignments allow us to have the desired mass matrix corresponding to

the charged lepton sector

〈Φl〉 = vl.

The charged lepton mass matrix is then given by,

m0l =

vhΛ

ylvl 0 0

0 ylvl 0

0 0 ylvl

, (8)

The Lagrangian LM is given by,

LM = yrNRsχ+ yr′NRsχ′ (9)

The charge assignments that have been chosen for the new flavon fields χ and χ′ are shown

in table II. The VEV alignments for the flavons which result in desired neutrino mass matrix

and leptonic mixing matrix are followed as:

〈Φ〉 = (vh1, vh2,−vh2), 〈φ′〉 = (vh1′ , vh2′ , vh2′), 〈Φs〉 = vs, 〈H〉 = vh, 〈χ〉 = (vr, vr′, 0), 〈χ′〉 = (0, vr′′, 0)

With these flavon alignments different terms in the Lagrangian given by equation (5) can

be written as;

y

ΛNiRLjHΦ =

y

ΛH[N1RL1Φ1 + (

√3

2N2RL2 −

1

2N1RL2)Φ2 + (−

√3

2N2RL3 −

1

2N1RL3)Φ3]

=yvhΛ

[N1RL1vh1 + (

√3

2N2RL2 −

1

2N1RL2)vh2 + (

√3

2N2RL3 +

1

2N1RL3)vh2]

(10)

9

y′ΛNiRLjHΦ′ =

y′ΛH[N2RL1Φ1

′ + (−√

3

2N1RL2 −

1

2N2RL2)Φ2

′ + (

√3

2N1RL3 −

1

2N2RL3)Φ3

′]

=y′vhΛ

[N2RL1vh1′ + (−√

3

2N1RL2 −

1

2N2RL2)vh2′ + (

√3

2N1RL3 −

1

2N2RL3)vh2′ ]

(11)

yrNiRsjχ = yr[N1Rs1Φ1R + (

√3

2N2Rs2 −

1

2N1Rs2)Φ2R + (−

√3

2N2Rs3 −

1

2N1Rs3)Φ3R]

= yr[(N1Rs1)vr + (

√3

2N2Rs2 −

1

2N1Rs2)vr′ ] (12)

yr′NiRsjχ

′ = y′r[N2Rs1Φ1R′ + (−

√3

2N1Rs2 −

1

2N2Rs2)Φ2R

′ + (

√3

2N1Rs3 −

1

2N2Rs3)Φ3R

′]

= yr′[(−√

3

2N1Rs2 −

1

2N2Rs2)vr′′ ] (13)

ysssΦs = ys(s1s1 + s2s2 + s3s3)vs. (14)

The chosen flavon alignments lead to different matrices involved in inverse seesaw formula

as follows,

Md =vhΛ

yvh1 y′vh1′

−12yvh2 −

√3

2y′vh2′

√3

2yvh2 − 1

2y′vh2′

12yvh2 +

√3

2y′vh2′

√3

2yvh2 − 1

2y′vh2′

M =

yrvr −√32yr′vr′′ − 1

2yrvr′ 0

0√

32yrvr′ − 1

2yr′vr′′ 0

µ = ys

1 0 0

0 1 0

0 0 1

vs

Now,we denote a = yΛvhvh1 , b = vh

Λ(−1

2yvh2−

√3

2y′vh2′), c = vh

Λ(√

32yvh2−1

2y′vh2′), e = y′

Λvhvh1′ ,

f = yrvr ,h = −√

32yr′vr′′ − 1

2yrvr′, g =

√3

2yrvr′ − 1

2yr′vr′′ , p = ysvs. With these notations the

mass matrices involved in ISS can be written as,

MD =

a e

b c

−b c

, µ =

p 0 0

0 p 0

0 0 p

, M =

f h 0

0 g 0

. (15)

10

The elements of the light neutrino mass matrix in the framework of ISS(2,3) arising from

the above mentioned mass matrices are given below:

(−mν)11 =(a2g2 − 2aegh+ e2(f 2 + h2))p

f 2g2

(−mν)12 =(−acgh+ bg(ag − eh) + ce(f 2 + h2))p

f 2g2

(−mν)13 =(−acgh+ bg(−ag + eh) + ce(f 2 + h2))p

f 2g2

(−mν)22 =(b2g2 − 2bcgh+ c2(f 2 + h2))p

f 2g2

(−mν)23 =(b2g2 − c2(f 2 + h2))p

f 2g2

(−mν)33 =(b2g2 + 2bcgh+ c2(f 2 + h2))p

f 2g2

Here, we have used S4 product rules in formulating the mass matrices that are discussed

above. The light neutrino mass matrix obtained here in both the models can give rise to

the correct mass squared difference and non-zero θ13. Besides, to avoid some non-desired

interactions among the fields we require Z4 × Z3 symmetry. Thus the desired structures of

the mass matrices have been made possible by the combination of flavor symmetry S4 as

well as Z4 × Z3 symmetry.

IV. DARK MATTER IN THE ISS(2,3) FRAMEWORK

As mentioned in the previous sections, ISS(2,3) is a common framework to address neu-

trino phenomenology as well as the cosmological DM problem. This type of inverse seesaw

bears the specialty that there exists an additional intermediate state with mass ms = O(µ)

in the mass spectrum.

Depending on the number of fields in the model, a generic ISS realization is characterized

by the following mass spectrum [43]

1. Three light active states with masses of the form

mν = O(µ)k2

1 + k2, k =

O(Md)

O(MN)

2. #νR pairs of pseudo-Dirac heavy neutrinos with massesO(M) + O(Md).

3. #s–#νR light sterile states (present only if #s >#νR) with masses O(µ).

11

In order to realize the model phenomenologically, after diagonalizing the matrix associated

to a given ISS realization, must produce three light active eigenstates with mass differences

in agreement with oscillation data and a mixing pattern compatible with the experimental

data. In the scenario of ISS if #s >#νR,there exists a light sterile state with mass O(µ).

This state has unique feature that if the mass of this is in the range of several keV and

with very small mixing with the active neutrinos, it will provide a particle with the lifetime

exceeding the age of the Universe, which can be a WDM candidate [51, 52]. ISS has also the

advantage that it allows for a non zero mixing between the active and the additional sterile

states. [69] . Among different ISS scenario, ISS(2,3) is considered to be the lowest possible

way to accommodate a viable dark matter candidate [43, 56] as it contains unequal number

of NR and s, leading to a DM particle as well as two heavy pseudo-Dirac pairs [70].

Now, the mass matrix in this framework with ‖µ‖ 6 ‖Md‖, ‖MN‖ can be block diago-

nalised into light and heavy sectors as [71]

mν ≈Md(MTN)−1µM−1

N MTd (16)

MH =

0 MN

MTN µ

where mν is the famous ISS formula and MH is the mass matrix for the heavy pseudo-Dirac

pairs and the extra state. mν is diagonalised by PMNS Uν to get the light active neutrinos.

While the diagonalisation of MH will give the mass of the other five heavy particles.

In the framework of ISS(2,3), M is not a squared matrix rather it is a 2 × 3 matrix. So,

M−1 is not well defined. We followed the general version of (16)as proposed by the authors

[69] . It follows as,

mν ≈MddMTd (17)

where d is 2× 2 dimensional submatrix defined as

MH−1 =

d2×2 ....

..... ....

with

MH =

0 MN

MTN µ

It is important to calculate the active-sterile mixing to study the DM phenomenology. In

this context, one can obtain the active-sterile mixing from the first three components of the

12

eigenvectors corresponding to the keV ranged eigenvalue of the mass matrix M in equation

(1). Any stable neutrino state with a non-vanishing mixing to the active neutrinos will

be produced through active-sterile neutrino conversion and the resulting relic abundance is

proportional to the active-sterile mixing and the mass and can be expressed as [72]:

ΩDMh2 = 1.1× 107

∑Cα(ms)|Uαs|2

( ms

keV

)2

, α = e, µ, τ (18)

The derivation of the above formula can be found in appendix B . It can be simplified to

the following expression,

ΩDMh2 u 0.3

(sin22θ

10−10

)( ms

100keV

)2

(19)

where sin22θ = 4∑

α=e,µ,τ |Uαs|2 with |Uαs|is the active-sterile leptonic mixing matrix ele-

ment which will be obtained using equation (3)and ms represents the mass of the lightest

sterile fermion.

The most important criteria for a DM candidate is its stability atleast on cosmological

scale. The lightest sterile neutrino is not totally stable and may decay into an active neutrino

and a photon γ via the process N −→ ν+γ that leads to a monochromatic X-ray line signal.

However,as discussed in many literature [52], the decay rate is negligible with respect to the

cosmological scale because of the small mixing angle. The decay rate is given as [73]:

Γ = 1.38× 10−32

(sin22θ

10−10

)( ms

keV

)5

s−1. (20)

As seen from the above equations, the decay rate and as well as the relic abundance depend

on mixing and mass of the DM candidate. Hence, the same set of model parameters which

are supposed to produce correct neutrino phenomenology can also be used to evaluate the

relic abundance and the decay rate of the sterile neutrino.

V. CONSTRAINTS ON KEV SCALE STERILE NEUTRINO AND EFFECTS OF

HEAVY PSEUDO-DIRAC NEUTRINO STATES

Sterile neutrinos produced by the mixing with active neutrinos can have impacts on sev-

eral phenomena. Cosmology, low energy and collider observables can severely constrain the

model of keV sterile neutrinos as mentioned in [74]. Apart from this, the four pseudo-Dirac

13

states present in the model may have significant effects on phenomena like lepton number vi-

olation, perturbativity of Yukawa couplings,unitarity violation in the active neutrino mixing

matrix [75],which are included in our discussion.

Firstly, the extension of standard model must comply with the latest neutrino oscillation

data for both normal as well as inverted hierarchy. Our model is compatible with that as

we have evaluated the model parameters using the latest global fit neutrino oscillation data

[76] which will be discussed in the next section.

Perturbativity of Yukawa couplings is another important condition to be satisfied by any

model. It puts strong upper bound on the Yukawa couplings. Our model contains three

types of Yukawa couplings y(y′),ys and yr(y′r). The mass range of the flavon fields are so

chosen that it comply with the perturbativity of Yukawa couplings in each case. Thus, in

our analysis to explain neutrino phenomenology and dark matter Yukawa couplings are in

the range (10−5 − 10−2) which satisfies the perturbativity limits. The presence of heavy

pseudo-Dirac states cannot affect the perturbativity limits of Yukawa couplings.

The addition of heavy neutrinos to the standard model may originate processes like

lepton number violating interactions, among which neutrinoless double beta decay(0νββ) is

the most significant one [77]. In our study, we have calculated the contributions of the four

pseudo-Dirac states and also the sterile state to the effective electron neutrino Majorana

mass mee according to [78, 79]. We have used the strong bounds on the effective mass

provided by KamLAND-ZEN [80]

mee < 0.061− 0.165eV (21)

In our analysis, we did not impose any unitarity violation in the active neutrino mixing

matrix (PMNS matrix). In our framework, the effective light neutrino mass matrix mν can

be written as

mν = U∗mνU† (22)

The unitary matrix U is related to the PMNS mixing matrix Uν as follows [69]

Uν = (1− 1

2θθ†)U +O(θ3) ' (1− η)U (23)

Here, θ can be expressed as,

θ = MdM−1N (24)

14

In our analysis, η lies in the range (10−6 − 10−11) which can be ignored in the calculations.

Moreover, as mentioned by the authors in [69], strong experimental constraints allow us to

neglect θ which parametrises the deviation from unitarity of the PMNS matrix.

Direct detection of sterile neutrino provides a strong bounds on mass-mixing parameter

space. There are several experiments for the detection of dark matter [81, 82]. We have

considered the constraints from XENON100,XENON1T which have provided bounds on

active-sterile mixing and our model is consistent with these bounds [82].

A number of cosmological observations put constraints on sum of the three neutrino

masses for both normal and inverted hierarchy [83]. It has been observed that our model is

consistent with the cosmological limits on sum of the active neutrino masses.

Indirect detection is a powerful technique to search for dark matter in which involves in

looking for signatures of DM decaying or annihilating into visible products [84]. Many well

motivated DM candidates could produce the characteristic signature of monochromatic X

ray lines. Sterile neutrinos in keV range can decay into decay into an active neutrino and a

mono- energetic photon(γ). This kind of signature is within reach of satellite detectors like

CHANDRA [85] and XMN [86] providing significant bounds on DM mass and DM-active

couplings. In our analysis, we have imposed the constraints on the mass-mixing parameter

space as mentioned in [73, 87, 88].

The study of the matter power spectrum in the intergalactic medium (IGM) has been

extensively used to constrain the nature of DM [89]. In particular,the new limits on the

nature of DM comes from from the observable of the IGM in the ultraviolet and optical

bands, the so called Lyman forest [90]. The Lyman-α constraint is strongly model dependent

and the bounds are related to the warm dark matter production mechanism,and to which

extent this mechanism contributes to the total DM abundance [56]. Warm dark matter

candidates are subjected to significant constraints from structure formation, which provides

lower bounds on the DM mass [91]. In our model, sterile neutrinos are produced via non

resonant production (NRP) mechanism. The Lyman-α data imposes strong constraint on

the mass of the sterile neutrino. We have adopted the results in [92, 93].

15

VI. NUMERICAL ANALAYSIS AND RESULTS

As discussed before, the structures of the different matrices mD, M, µ involved in ISS are

formed using the discrete flavor symmetry S4 and we obtain resulting light neutrino mass

matrix using (17) . The light neutrino mass matrix arising from the model is consistent with

non-zero θ13 as S4 product rules lead to the light neutrino mass matrix in which the µ− τ

symmetry is explicitly broken. The neutrino mass matrix contains eight complex model

parameters. For the numerical analysis,we have fixed the value of two model parameters.

The remaining six parameters can be evaluated by comparing the neutrino mass matrix

arising from the model with the one which is parametrized by the available 3σ global fit

data given in table III. This parametric form of light neutrino mass matrix is complex

symmetric and so it contains six independent complex elements. Thus we can solve the six

model parameters in terms of the known neutrino parameters using equation (25). We first

randomly generate the nine light neutrino parameters in the 3σ range and then we evaluate

the six model parameters. The light neutrino mass matrix can be written as,

mν = UPMNSmdiagν UT

PMNS (25)

where the Pontecorvo-Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata (PMNS) leptonic mixing matrix can be

parametrized as [94]

UPMNS =

c12c13 s12c13 s13e

−iδ

−s12c23 − c12s23s13eiδ c12c23 − s12s23s13e

iδ s23c13

s12s23 − c12c23s13eiδ −c12s23 − s12c23s13e

iδ c23c13

UMaj (26)

where cij = cos θij, sij = sin θij and δ is the leptonic Dirac CP phase. The diagonal matrix

UMaj = diag(1, eiα, ei(β+δ)) contains the Majorana CP phases α, β. The diagonal mass matrix

of the light neutrinos can be written as, mdiagν = diag(0,

√m2

1 + ∆m2solar,

√m2

1 + ∆m2atm) for

normal hierarchy and mdiagν = diag(

√m2

3 + ∆m2atm,

√∆m2

solar + ∆m2atm,m3) for inverted

hierarchy [95]. For numerical analysis, we have fixed the value of f = 2 × 1010eV and

g = 1012eV and calculated the other model parameters a,b,c,e,h in our model. The fixing of

model parameters is done considering the range given in [69]to get the desired DM mass and

mixing. Author [69] , specified that the first row of the submatrix MN determines the mass

scale of the lightest pseudo-Dirac pair and the second row of the submatrix MN determines

the mass scale of the heavier pseudo-Dirac pair. In our model, parameters f and h give the

16

Oscillation parameters 3σ(NO) 3σ(IO)∆m2

2110−5eV 2 7.05 - 8.14 7.05 - 8.14

∆m231

10−3eV 2 2.41 - 2.60 2.31-2.51

sin2θ12 0.273 - 0.379 0.273 - 0.379

sin2θ23 0.445 - 0.599 0.453 - 0.598

sin2θ13 0.0196 - 0.0241 0.0199 - 0.0244

δπ 0.87 - 1.94 1.12- 1.94

TABLE III: Latest Global fit neutrino oscillation Data [76].

range of the lightest pseudo-Dirac pair and g corresponds to the heavier one. Keeping this

in mind, we have fixed two model parameters from the given range. The eigenvalues of MH

e.g.in case of model are obtained as

MH1 =1

2(p−

√2f 2 + 2g2 + 2h2 − 2

√−4f 2g2 + (−f 2 − g2 − h2)2 + p2 (27)

MH2 =1

2(p+

√2f 2 + 2g2 + 2h2 − 2

√−4f 2g2 + (−f 2 − g2 − h2)2 + p2 (28)

MH3 =1

2(p−

√2f 2 + 2g2 + 2h2 + 2

√−4f 2g2 + (−f 2 − g2 − h2)2 + p2 (29)

MH4 =1

2(p+

√2f 2 + 2g2 + 2h2 + 2

√−4f 2g2 + (−f 2 − g2 − h2)2 + p2 (30)

.

MH5 = p (31)

It is evident that one of the eigenvalues depends only on the mass matrix µ and hence

may be considered as the lightest sterile state as discussed in the previous section. This

eigenvalue corresponds to the mass of the Dark Matter mDM . Thus the model parameter

p will determine the mass of the DM. The DM-active mixing can be determined from (1)

and we plot the mixing as a function of model parameters as well as the DM mass. One

can also obtain the mass of the dark matter from the eigenvalues of the 8 × 8 matrix M

in equation (1). In our model, three eigenvalues correspond to the light active neutrino

masses, four eigenvalues in TeV range give the mass of the pseudo-Dirac particles while one

of the eigenvalues lie in keV range which is considered as DM mass. To get the active-

sterile mixing, first we numerically diagonalise the matrix M in equation (3) using the

evaluated model parameters to obtain U and then we find the first three components of the

17

eigenvector corresponding to the eigenvalue mDM which represent the three active-sterile

mixing elements.

Using the same set of model parameters,numerically evaluated for the model, we have

also calculated the relic abundance using equation (18) and plot it as a function of the Dark

Matter mass. The decay rates of the sterile DM are obtained using(20) which have been

plotted as a function of the Dark Matter mass as it imposes powerful constraint on DM

mass.

The masses of the heavy neutrinos and their mixing with the active neutrinos are sub-

jected to various experimental constraints like neutrinoless double beta decay (0νββ). The

decay width is proportional to the effective electron neutrino majorana mass (mee) and the

standard contribution is given as,

mee =∣∣∣ 3∑i=1

Uei2mi

∣∣∣ (32)

Addition of extra fermions may contribute to the effective electron neutrino Majorana mass

[96] We have evaluated the contribution to (mee) using the equation in [78, 97]

Mee =∣∣∣ 3∑i=1

Uei2mi

∣∣∣ +∣∣∣ 5∑j=1

Uej2 Mj

k2 +M2j

| < k > |2∣∣∣ (33)

where, Mj and Uej represent the mass of the heavy neutrinos and couplings to the electron

neutrino respectively. | < k > | ' 190 MeV represents neutrino virtuality momentum.

The mixing of the heavy neutrinos to the electron neutrino are obtained from the mixing

matrix U . For this, the four eigenvectors corresponding to four TeV ranged eigenvalues are

evaluated and then the first components of four eigenvectors give the mixing of the heavy

neutrinos to the electron neutrino.

Thus using the same set of model parameters that are used to give correct neutrino

phenomenology, we have calculated the the effective electron neutrino majorana mass in

(0νββ), DM-Active mixing, decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino and relic abundance

for normal hierarchy(NH) as well as inverted hierarchy(IH).

• We have shown different plots obtained from our numerical analysis carried out for

normal hierarchy as well as inverted hierarchy from fig 1 to fig 17.

• Fig 1 indicates the parameter space for DM mass and DM-active mixing for normal and

inverted hierarchy. To be a good DM candidate, sterile neutrino must have mass in the

18

range (0.4-50)keV and should mix with active neutrinos within the range(10−12−10−8).

From the figure it is clear that both the mass and mixing satisfy the cosmological limit.

We have incorporated the cosmological bounds from Lyman-α and X-ray data in the

figure.

• Fig 2 shows the prediction of decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino as a function of

DM mass for both the mass hierarchies. It is seen that the decay rate is very negligible

and in the range 10−31 to 10−27 s−1 for both the hierarchies. The decay rate imposes

influential constraint on DM mass and the constraints from structure formation are

imposed in the figure. From fig 1, it is evident that X-ray limits exclude the DM

masses above 17 keV which has also been incorporated in the fig 2

• We have shown the relic abundance of the proposed DM candidate as a function of

DM mass in fig 3 . The relic abundance shown here indicates the partial contribution

of sterile neutrinos to the total DM abundance. Our model can account for almost

66% of the total DM abundance for NH and almost 83% of the total DM abundance

for IH. The limits on the mass of the dark matter from Lyman-α and X-ray data as

obtained from the previous figures are also imposed in fig 3. The allowed region of the

parameter space is spanned from 10 keV to 17 keV.

• Fig 4, 5 and 6 show the two parameter contour plots with DM mass as contour in NH

and Fig 7, 8 and 9 show the two parameter contour plots with DM mass as contour in

IH. In our model, we have six model parameters and one of them corresponds to DM

mass. Hence, we are left with five model parameters and 10 different combinations of

parameters which are shown. It is observed that for both the hierarchies, the model

parameters give rise to DM mass within the cosmological limit. The values of the

model parameters giving rise to the allowed DM mass are given in table IV.

• Fig 10, 11 and 12 show the two parameter contour plots with DM-active mixing as

contour in NH while fig 13, 14 and 15 represent the two parameter contour plots with

DM-active mixing as contour in IH. Here also, we have 10 different combinations of

model parameters. It is observed that for both the hierarchies, the model parameters

give rise to DM-active mixing within the range predicted by cosmology. The allowed

values of the model parameters are shown in table V.

19

FIG. 1: DM-active mixing as a function of the mass of the DM for both normal hierarchy as well

as inverted hierarchy.

• Fig 16 and Fig 17 shows the effects of the heavy states present in the model on

effective mass as a function of mDM . Here, mee represents the standard contribution

while Mee is the contribution from the pseudo-Dirac states as well as the sterile state.

The presence of pseudo-Dirac states along with the sterile state increases the effective

mass parameter upto 1.7 times (1.4 times) larger than the standard contribution for

NH (IH). It is observed that the change is significant below 10 keV of dark matter

mass which range is however excluded by Ly − α data. It is evident from the figures

that the model parameters give rise to effective mass within the experimental limits

provided by KamLAND-ZEN for both the hierarchies.

• Fig 18 indicates the variation of sum of the light neutrino masses as a function of

dark matter mass mDM for NH and IH. It is observed that for both the hierarchies,

our model is consistent with the cosmological limits on the sum of the light neutrino

masses.

VII. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Searching for the particle nature of dark matter is a challenging issue to the physics

community worldwide. Motivated by this, we have conducted our study in the framework

of ISS(2,3) which leads to three light active neutrino states, two pseudo-Dirac states and an

20

FIG. 2: Decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino as a function of DM mass for normal hierarchy

as well as inverted hierarchy.

FIG. 3: Sterile neutrino contribution to DM abundance in NH and IH

Model Parameter NH(eV) IH(eV)

a 1.5× 107 − 7.5× 107 1× 107 − 8.0× 108

b 1.5× 107 − 7.7× 107 4.0× 107 − 2.5× 108

c 2.0× 109 − 1.0× 1010 2.5× 108 − 1.7× 109

e 2.5× 108 − 3.4× 109 2.5× 109 − 2.7× 1010

h 2.0× 109 − 1.0× 1010 0.5× 1010 − 4.8× 1010

TABLE IV: Allowed range of the model parameters satisfying DM mass.

21

FIG. 4: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with Dark Matter mass as a contour for

normal hierarchy. The mass limit as predicted by cosmology is (0.4− 50)keV.

additional sterile state in keV range which can be considered as a dark matter candidate.

The motivation of the work is to search for a common framework which can simultaneously

address the dark matter problem as well as neutrino phenomenology. We have considered the

model which is the extension of standard model by discrete flavor symmetry S4×Z4×Z3 that

can simultaneously explain the correct neutrino oscillation data and also provides a good

dark matter candidate. The different mass matrices involved in ISS(2,3) are constructed

using S4 product rules which lead to a light neutrino mass matrix mν which is consistent

with the broken µ− τ symmetry.

We have evaluated the model parameters by comparing the light neutrino mass matrix

with the one constructed from light neutrino parameters for both the hierarchical pattern

22



of neutrino mass spectrum(NH and IH). After finding the model parameters, we then use

the allowed parameters to calculate the mass of the lightest sterile neutrino which is consid-

ered as dark matter candidate and also the DM-active mixing. We obtain two parameter

contour plots taking dark matter mass and DM-active mixing as contours. It is quite inter-

esting that a wide range of model parameters give dark matter mass and DM-active mixing

within the cosmological range for both normal as well as inverted hierarchy. By comparing

different plots for different combinations of the model parameters, we have found a com-

mon allowed parameter space considering the requirement of satisfying the correct DM mass

and mixing within the model framework. Considering the lightest sterile neutrino as dark

matter candidate, we have calculated the relic abundance which accounts for almost ∼ 83

% of the total DM abundance. We have also verified the stability of the dark matter by

23



Model Parameter NH(eV) IH(eV)

a 0.1× 107 − 5.0× 107 0.1× 107 − 3.0× 108

b 0.1× 107 − 5.0× 107 1.0× 107 − 1.5× 108

c 0.1× 109 − 8.0× 109 1.0× 108 − 1.9× 109

e 0.1× 108 − 2.0× 109 1.0× 109 − 1.7× 1010

h 0.1× 109 − 9.5× 109 2.0× 109 − 3.0× 1010

TABLE V: Allowed range of the model parameters satisfying DM-active mixing.

calculating the decay rate of the lightest sterile neutrino in the process N −→ ν + γ (N

being the sterile neutrino) with same range of allowed parameters. We have obtained a

negligible decay rate which ensures the stability of the dark matter candidate at least in

the cosmological scales. We have also verified the viability of the model from different phe-

nomena like constraints from direct searches of sterile neutrinos, deviation from unitarity

of the PMNS mixing matrix, perturbativity of the Yukawa couplings, neutrinoless double

beta decay. Thus we present a model which offers a well-motivated DM candidate as well

as correct neutrino phenomenology. The detailed numerical analysis assures sufficient pa-

rameter space satisfying the criteria of a feasible dark matter candidate and a better reach

for neutrino sector as well. A wide range of parameter space allowed from the dark matter

24


inverted hierarchy The mass limit as predicted by cosmology is (0.4− 50)keV.

consideration, has the possibility to be probed at LHC in near future. The keV scale sterile

neutrino can play a vital role in successfully achieving low scale leptogenesis, which we leave

for our future study.

Appendix A: Properties of S4 group

S4 is the group of permutations of four objects with 24 group elements. S and T are the

two generators [98] of S4 satisfying

T 4 = S3 = e, TS2T = S (A1)

25



All of the S4 elements can be written as products of these two generators. There are five

inequivalent irreducible representations of S4, two singlets 1 and 1′, one doublet 2 and

two triplets 3 and 3′. S and T have different structures depending on which irreducible

representation we are considering singlet, doublet or triplet. The representations are given

as follows

a, b ∼ 11,

a1

a2

,

b1

b2

∼ 2,

a1

a2

a3

,

b1

b2

b3

∼ 3,

a′1

a′2

a′3

,

b′1

b′2

b′3

∼ 3′.

The tensor products of S4 that has been used in the present analysis are given below (for

26



more details see [98])

3× 1 = 3, 3× 1′ = 3′, 3′ × 1′ = 3, 2× 1′ = 2.

(A)3 × (B)3 = (A ·B)1 +

A · Σ ·B

A · Σ∗ ·B

2

+

AyBz

AzBx

AxBy

3

+

[AyBz]

[AzBx]

[AxBy]

3′

. (A2)

A ·B = AxBx + AyBy + AzBz

AiBj = AiBj +BjAi

[AiBj] = AiBj − AjBj

A · Σ ·B = AxBx + ωAyBy + ω2AzBz

A · Σ∗ ·B = AxBx + ω2AyBy + ωAzBz.

(A3)

Later on for simplicity, we can replace 3→ 31, 3′ → 32, 1→ 11, 1′ → 12.

2⊗ 31 = 31 ⊕ 32,

31 ⊗ 31 = 11 ⊕ 2⊕ 31 ⊕ 32,

32 ⊗ 32 = 11 ⊕ 2⊕ 31 ⊕ 32.

27

FIG. 10: Variation of different model parameters (in eV) with the DM-active mixing as the contour

for normal hierarchy. The limit as predicted by cosmology is (10−12 − 10−8)

The Clebsch-Gordon coefficients for 2⊗ 31, used in our analysis is as follows

a1

a2

2

⊗

b1

b2

b3

31

=

a2b1

−12(√

3a1b2 + a2b2)

12(√

3a1b3 − a2b3)

31

⊕

a1b1

12(√

3a2b2 − a1b2)

−12(√

3a2b3 + a1b3)

32

.

Similarly,the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients for 31 ⊗ 31, used in our analysis can be expressed

28



as, a1

a2

a3

31

⊗

b1

b2

b3

31

= (a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3)11 ⊕

1/√

2(a2b2 − a3b3)

1/√

6(−2a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3)

2

⊕

a2b3 + a3b2

a1b3 + a3b1

a1b2 + a2b1

31

⊕

a3b2 − a2b3

a1b3 − a3b1

a2b1 − a1b2

32

.

29



The Clebsch-Gordon coefficients for 32 ⊗ 32, used in our analysis is given as,a1

a2

a3

32

⊗

b1

b2

b3

32

= (a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3)11 ⊕

1/√

2(a2b2 − a3b3)

1/√

6(−2a1b1 + a2b2 + a3b3)

2

⊕

a2b3 + a3b2

a1b3 + a3b1

a1b2 + a2b1

31

⊕

a3b2 − a2b3

a1b3 − a3b1

a2b1 − a1b2

32

.

Appendix B: Derivation of Boltzmann Equation in FRW Universe:Expression for

relic density

Boltzmann equation is integral partial differential equation for the phase space distribu-

tion of all the species present in the Universe. The evolution of phase space distribution

function of the particles is governed by Boltzmann equation and solution of this equation

gives the relic density of the species. Solution of Boltzmann equation is important to find

the relic abundance of the dark matter candidate. The number density is governed by[99]

dnadt

+ 3Hna = Ca (B1)

30


for inverted hierarchy. The limit as predicted by cosmology is (10−12 − 10−8)

where Ca is the collision operator representing all interactions present among the particles

and H is the Hubble parameter. We consider 2 −→ 2 process in which Ca can be written

as[100]

Cab−→cd = −∫

(2π)4δ4(pa+pb−pc−pd)dπadπbdπcdπd[|Mab−→cd|2fafb−|Mcd−→ab|2fcfd (B2)

where dπi represents the phase space and the expression for dπi obtained as follows,

dπi = gid3π

2E × (2π)3(B3)

and,

fi =ni(t)

neqi (t)f eqi (E, t) (B4)

31



Here,we consider CP or T invariance so that

|Mab−→cd|2 = |Mcd−→ab|2 = |M |2

and equation (B2) can be read as,


(2π)4δ4(pa + pb − pc − pd)dπadπbdπcdπd[|M |2(fafb − fcfd)] (B5)

(fafb − fcfd) is the collision term in the Boltzmann equation.

fi = exp[−Ei − µT

] (B6)

We assume chemical potential to be zero (µ = 0) which gives (fafb− fcfd) = [fafb− f eqa feqb ]

32



FIG. 16: Preictoions of effective mass as a function of mDM for normal hierarchy. The standard

contribution is shown in blue color and nonstandard contributions with pseudo-Dirac neutrinos and

sterile state are shown in red color. Comparison of these two contributions are shown in the figure

on the right side.

as energy part of the delta function enforcesEa + Eb = Ec − Ed, using equation(B4)we get,


1

naeqnbeq(2π)4δ4(pa+pb−pc−pd)dπadπbdπcdπd|M |2exp[−

EaT

]exp[−EbT

][nanb−neqa neqb ]

(B7)

33

FIG. 17: Effective mass as a function of mDM for inverted hierarchy.The standard contribution is

shown in blue color and nonstandard contributions with pseudo-Dirac neutrinos and sterile state

are shown in red color. Comparison of these two contributions are shown in the figure on the right

side.

FIG. 18: Sum of light neutrino masses as a function of mass of DM for both normal hierarchy as

well as inverted hierarchy.

Again considering na = nb we can write,


1

(naeq)2(2π)4δ4(pa+pb−pc−pd)dπadπbdπcdπd|M |2exp[−

EaT

]exp[−EbT

][n2a−(neqa )2]

(B8)

Cab−→cd = < σ|v >rel[n2a − (neqa )2] (B9)

34

where,the thermally averaged annihilation cross-section is given as,

< σ|v > = −∫

1

(naeq)2(2π)4δ4(pa + pb − pc − pd)dπadπbdπcdπd|M |2exp[−

EaT

]exp[−EbT

]

Thus the relic abundance of a any particle χ is governed by the Boltzmann equation as

followsdnχdt

+ 3Hnχ = < σ|v >rel[n2χ − (neqχ )2] (B10)

To solve it, we replace the variable number density n by Y = nS, S being the entropy of the

Universe and

t = 0.301g−2mpl

m2x2

. Now we havedY

dx= −x < σ|v > S

H(m)(Y 2 − Yeq2) (B11)

The relic abundance of a given elementary particle is a measure of the present quantity of

that particle remaining from the Big Bang. It can be expressed as[101],

Ωχh2 =

ρ0

ρcrit=S0Y∞m

ρcrit(B12)

where S0 presents entropy andY∞ = Y (x = ∞) is the present value. ρcrit can be obtained

from 8ΠGρcrit = 3H02, H0 is the Hubble constant. Thus ,solving the equation (B11) for

Y (x = ∞), one can get the expression for relic abundance of a species. In case of sterile

neutrinos, the relic abundance can be expressed as[72]:

Ωαs =msYαs

3.65× 10−9h2GeV(B13)

Here,ms represents the mass of the sterile neutrino and Yαs is the neutrino Yukawa couplings.

Using the parametrisation |εαs| ≈ θαs[56],we get,

Ωαsh2 = 0.273× 109msYαs|εαs|2

θ2αs

GeV −1

= 0.11× 2.49× 10−5msYαsθ2αs

(|εαs|

0.1eV)2

= 1.1× 107Cα(ms)|εαs|(ms

keV)2 (B14)

where,

Cα(ms) = 2.49× 10−5Yαsθ2αs

keV

ms

(B15)

35

Acknowledgements

NG acknowledges Department of Science and Technology (DST),India(grant

DST/INSPIRE Fellowship/2016/IF160994) for the financial assistantship. The work

of MKD is supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India

under the project no. EMR/2017/001436.

[1] Fukuda, S., Fukuda, Y., Ishitsuka, M., Itow, Y., Kajita, T. et al. Constraints on neutrino os-

cillations using 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande solar neutrino data. Physical Review Letters,

86(25):5656, 2001

[2] Ahmad, Q. R., Allen, R., Andersen, T., Anglin, J., Barton, J. et al. Direct evidence for

neutrino flavor transformation from neutral-current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino

Observatory. Physical review letters, 89(1):011301, 2002

[3] Ahmad, Q., Allen, R., Andersen, T., Anglin, J., Barton, J. et al. Measurement of day

and night neutrino energy spectra at SNO and constraints on neutrino mixing parameters.

Physical Review Letters, 89(1):011302, 2002

[4] Abe, S., Ebihara, T., Enomoto, S., Furuno, K., Gando, Y. et al. Precision measurement of

neutrino oscillation parameters with KamLAND. Physical Review Letters, 100(22):221803,

2008

[5] King, S. F., Merle, A., Morisi, S., Shimizu, Y., and Tanimoto, M. Neutrino mass and mixing:

from theory to experiment. New Journal of Physics, 16(4):045018, 2014

[6] Ma, E. Pathways to naturally small neutrino masses. Physical Review Letters, 81(6):1171,

1998

[7] Mohapatra, R., Antusch, S., Babu, K., Barenboim, G., Chen, M.-C. et al. Theory of neutrinos:

a white paper. Reports on Progress in Physics, 70(11):1757, 2007

[8] King, S. F. Neutrino mass models. Reports on Progress in Physics, 67(2):107, 2003

[9] Mohapatra, R. N. and Valle, J. W. Neutrino mass and baryon-number nonconservation in

superstring models. Physical Review D, 34(5):1642, 1986

[10] Schechter, J. and Valle, J. W. Neutrino decay and spontaneous violation of lepton number.

Physical Review D, 25(3):774, 1982

36

[11] Abe, Y., Aberle, C., Dos Anjos, J., Barriere, J., Bergevin, M. et al. Reactor ν¯ e disappearance

in the Double Chooz experiment. Physical Review D, 86(5):052008, 2012

[12] Adamson, P., Anghel, I., Backhouse, C., Barr, G., Bishai, M. et al. Electron neutrino and an-

tineutrino appearance in the full MINOS data sample. Physical review letters, 110(17):171801,

2013

[13] An, F., Bai, J., Balantekin, A., Band, H., Beavis, D. et al. Observation of electron-

antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay. Physical Review Letters, 108(17):171803, 2012

[14] Abe, K., Abgrall, N., Ajima, Y., Aihara, H., Albert, J. et al. Indication of electron neutrino

appearance from an accelerator-produced off-axis muon neutrino beam. Physical Review

Letters, 107(4):041801, 2011



[16] Gonzalez-Garcia, M., Maltoni, M., and Schwetz, T. Global analyses of neutrino oscillation

experiments. Nuclear Physics B, 908:199–217, 2016

[17] Capozzi, F., Lisi, E., Marrone, A., Montanino, D., and Palazzo, A. Neutrino masses and

mixings: Status of known and unknown 3ν parameters. Nuclear Physics B, 908:218–234,

2016

[18] Hagedorn, C., Lindner, M., and Mohapatra, R. N. S4 flavor symmetry and fermion masses:

towards a grand unified theory of flavor. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2006(06):042, 2006

[19] Athanassopoulos, C. C. Athanassopoulos et al.(LSND Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 81,

1774 (1998). Phys. Rev. Lett., 81:1774, 1998

[20] Aguilar-Arevalo, A., Bazarko, A., Brice, S., Brown, B., Bugel, L. et al. Search for Electron

Neutrino Appearance at the ∆ m 2 1 eV 2 Scale. Physical review letters, 98(23):231801, 2007

[21] Aguilar-Arevalo, A., Brown, B., Bugel, L., Cheng, G., Conrad, J. et al. Significant excess

of electronlike events in the MiniBooNE short-baseline neutrino experiment. Physical review

letters, 121(22):221801, 2018

[22] Abdurashitov, J., Gavrin, V., Girin, S., Gorbachev, V., Ibragimova, T. et al. Measurement of

the response of a gallium metal solar neutrino experiment to neutrinos from a 51 Cr source.

Physical Review C, 59(4):2246, 1999

[23] Naumov, D. V. Sterile Neutrino. A short introduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.00151,

2019

37

[24] Das, P., Mukherjee, A., and Das, M. K. Active and sterile neutrino phenomenology with A4

based minimal extended seesaw. Nuclear Physics B, 2019

[25] Dodelson, S. and Widrow, L. M. Sterile neutrinos as dark matter. Physical Review Letters,

72(1):17, 1994

[26] Hamann, J., Hannestad, S., Raffelt, G. G., and Wong, Y. Y. Sterile neutrinos with eV masses

in cosmologyâĂŤhow disfavoured exactly? Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics,

2011(09):034, 2011

[27] Mohapatra, R. N. and Senjanović, G. Neutrino masses and mixings in gauge models with

spontaneous parity violation. Physical Review D, 23(1):165, 1981

[28] Gell-Mann, M., Ramond, P., and Slansky, R. PRINT-80-0576-CERN; RN Mohapatra and G.

Senjanovic. Phys. Rev. Lett, 44:912, 1980

[29] Arhrib, A., Bajc, B., Ghosh, D. K., Han, T., Huang, G.-Y. et al. Collider signatures for the

heavy lepton triplet in the type I+ III seesaw mechanism. Physical Review D, 82(5):053004,

2010

[30] Ma, E. and Roy, D. Heavy triplet leptons and new gauge boson. Nuclear Physics B, 644(1-

2):290–302, 2002

[31] Foot, R., Lew, H., He, X.-G., and Joshi, G. C. See-saw neutrino masses induced by a triplet

of leptons. Zeitschrift für Physik C Particles and Fields, 44(3):441–444, 1989

[32] Mohapatra, R. N. Mechanism for understanding small neutrino mass in superstring theories.

Physical review letters, 56(6):561, 1986

[33] González-Garciá, M. C. and Valle, J. W. Fast decaying neutrinos and observable flavour

violation in a new class of majoron models. Physics Letters B, 216(3-4):360–366, 1989

[34] Deppisch, F. and Valle, J. Enhanced lepton flavor violation in the supersymmetric inverse

seesaw model. Physical Review D, 72(3):036001, 2005

[35] Barnett, R. M., Carone, C., Groom, D., Trippe, T., Wohl, C. et al. Review of particle physics.


[36] Battaglieri, M., Belloni, A., Chou, A., Cushman, P., Echenard, B. et al. US cosmic visions:

new ideas in dark matter 2017: community report. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.04591, 2017

[37] Rubin, V. C. and Ford Jr, W. K. Rotation of the Andromeda nebula from a spectroscopic

survey of emission regions. The Astrophysical Journal, 159:379, 1970

[38] Cai, R.-G., Liu, T.-B., and Wang, S.-J. Reheating sensitivity on primordial black holes. arXiv

38

preprint arXiv:1806.05390, 2018

[39] Clowe, D., Bradač, M., Gonzalez, A. H., Markevitch, M., Randall, S. W. et al. A direct em-

pirical proof of the existence of dark matter. The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 648(2):L109,

2006

[40] Ade, P. PAR Ade et al.(Planck Collaboration), Astron. Astrophys. 594, A13 (2016). Astron.

Astrophys., 594:A13, 2016

[41] Taoso, M., Bertone, G., and Masiero, A. Dark matter candidates: a ten-point test. Journal

of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2008(03):022, 2008

[42] Mukherjee, A., Borah, D., and Das, M. K. Common origin of nonzero θ 13 and dark mat-

ter in an S 4 flavor symmetric model with inverse seesaw mechanism. Physical Review D,

96(1):015014, 2017

[43] Abada, A. and Lucente, M. Looking for the minimal inverse seesaw realisation. Nuclear

Physics B, 885:651–678, 2014

[44] Borah, D. and Dasgupta, A. Common origin of neutrino mass, dark matter and Dirac lepto-

genesis. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2016(12):034, 2016

[45] Kusenko, A. Sterile neutrinos: the dark side of the light fermions. Physics Reports, 481(1-

2):1–28, 2009

[46] Abazajian, K. N. Sterile neutrinos in cosmology. Physics Reports, 711:1–28, 2017

[47] Pal, P. B. and Wolfenstein, L. Radiative decays of massive neutrinos. Physical Review D,

25(3):766, 1982

[48] Dodelson, S. and Widrow, L. M. Sterile neutrinos as dark matter. Physical Review Letters,

72(1):17, 1994

[49] Bode, P., Ostriker, J. P., and Turok, N. Halo formation in warm dark matter models. The

Astrophysical Journal, 556(1):93, 2001

[50] Sommer-Larsen, J. and Dolgov, A. Formation of disk galaxies: warm dark matter and the

angular momentum problem. The Astrophysical Journal, 551(2):608, 2001

[51] Merle, A. keV sterile neutrino Dark Matter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08430, 2017

[52] Adhikari, R., Agostini, M., Ky, N. A., Araki, T., Archidiacono, M. et al. A white paper on keV

sterile neutrino dark matter. Journal of cosmology and astroparticle physics, 2017(01):025,

2017

[53] Tremaine, S. and Gunn, J. E. Dynamical role of light neutral leptons in cosmology. Physical

39

Review Letters, 42(6):407, 1979

[54] Boyarsky, A., Ruchayskiy, O., and Shaposhnikov, M. The role of sterile neutrinos in cosmology

and astrophysics. Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 59:191–214, 2009

[55] Merle, A. Constraining models for keV sterile neutrinos by quasidegenerate active neutrinos.


[56] Abada, A., Arcadi, G., and Lucente, M. Dark Matter in the minimal Inverse Seesaw mecha-

nism. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2014(10):001, 2014



[58] Dev, P. B. and Mohapatra, R. TeV scale inverse seesaw model in S O (10) and leptonic

nonunitarity effects. Physical Review D, 81(1):013001, 2010

[59] G Altarelli, F. F. Discrete flavor symmetries and models of neutrino mixing. Reviews of

modern physics - APS, 2010

[60] Altarelli, G. and Feruglio, F. Discrete flavor symmetries and models of neutrino mixing.

Reviews of modern physics, 82(3):2701, 2010

[61] Ishimori, H., Kobayashi, T., Ohki, H., Shimizu, Y., Okada, H. et al. Non-Abelian discrete

symmetries in particle physics. Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement, 183:1–163, 2010

[62] Ma, E. A_4 Origin of the Neutrino Mass Matrix. Phys. Rev. D, 70(hep-ph/0404199):031901,

2004

[63] Kalita, R. and Borah, D. Constraining Type I Seesaw with A_4 Flavor Symmetry From

Neutrino Data and Leptogenesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.05466, 2015

[64] Zee, A. Obtaining the neutrino mixing matrix with the tetrahedral group. Physics Letters

B, 630(1-2):58–67, 2005

[65] King, S. F. and Luhn, C. Neutrino mass and mixing with discrete symmetry. Reports on

Progress in Physics, 76(5):056201, 2013

[66] Mukherjee, A. and Das, M. K. Neutrino phenomenology and scalar Dark Matter with A4

flavor symmetry in Inverse and type II seesaw. Nuclear Physics B, 913:643–663, 2016

[67] Borgohain, H. and Das, M. K. Phenomenology of two texture zero neutrino mass in left-right

symmetric model with Z 8× Z 2. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(2):129, 2019

[68] L Dorame, E. P. J. V., S Morisi. New neutrino mass sum rule from the inverse seesaw

mechanism. Physical Review D, 2012

40

[69] Abada, A., Arcadi, G., Domcke, V., and Lucente, M. Neutrino masses, leptogenesis and dark

matter from small lepton number violation? Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics,

2017(12):024, 2017

[70] Lucente, M. Implication of Sterile Fermions in Particle Physics and Cosmology. arXiv preprint

arXiv:1609.07081, 2016

[71] Awasthi, R. L., Parida, M., and Patra, S. Neutrinoless double beta decay and pseudo-Dirac

neutrino mass predictions through inverse seesaw mechanism. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.4784,

2013

[72] Asaka, T., Shaposhnikov, M., and Laine, M. Lightest sterile neutrino abundance within the

νMSM. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2007(01):091, 2007

[73] Ng, K. C., Roach, B. M., Perez, K., Beacom, J. F., Horiuchi, S. et al. New Con-

straints on Sterile Neutrino Dark Matter from NuSTAR M31 Observations. arXiv preprint

arXiv:1901.01262, 2019

[74] Abada, A., De Romeri, V., and Teixeira, A. Impact of sterile neutrinos on nuclear-assisted

cLFV processes. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2016(2):83, 2016

[75] Chrzaszcz, M., Drewes, M., Gonzalo, T. E., Harz, J., Krishnamurthy, S. et al. A frequentist

analysis of three right-handed neutrinos with GAMBIT. 2019

[76] de Salas, P., Forero, D., Ternes, C., Tortola, M., and Valle, J. Status of neutrino oscillations

2018: 3σ hint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sensitivity. Physics Letters B,

782:633–640, 2018

[77] Beneš, P., Faessler, A., Kovalenko, S., and Šimkovic, F. Sterile neutrinos in neutrinoless

double beta decay. Physical Review D, 71(7):077901, 2005

[78] Abada, A., Hernandez-Cabezudo, A., and Marcano, X. Beta and neutrinoless double beta

decays with KeV sterile fermions. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2019(1):41, 2019

[79] Blennow, M., Fernandez-Martinez, E., Lopez-Pavon, J., and Menéndez, J. Neutrinoless dou-

ble beta decay in seesaw models. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2010(7):96, 2010

[80] Gando, A., Gando, Y., Hachiya, T., Hayashi, A., Hayashida, S. et al. Search for Majorana

neutrinos near the inverted mass hierarchy region with KamLAND-Zen. Physical review

letters, 117(8):082503, 2016

[81] Aprile, E., Aalbers, J., Agostini, F., Alfonsi, M., Amaro, F. et al. Intrinsic backgrounds from

Rn and Kr in the XENON100 experiment. The European Physical Journal C, 78(2):132, 2018

41

[82] Campos, M. D. and Rodejohann, W. Testing keV sterile neutrino dark matter in future direct

detection experiments. Physical Review D, 94(9):095010, 2016

[83] Aghanim, N. et al. Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. 2018

[84] Boyarsky, A., Neronov, A., Ruchayskiy, O., Shaposhnikov, M., and Tkachev, I. Strategy for

searching for a dark matter sterile neutrino. Physical review letters, 97(26):261302, 2006

[85] Horiuchi, S., Humphrey, P. J., Onorbe, J., Abazajian, K. N., Kaplinghat, M. et al. Sterile neu-

trino dark matter bounds from galaxies of the Local Group. Physical Review D, 89(2):025017,

2014

[86] Boyarsky, A., Iakubovskyi, D., Ruchayskiy, O., and Savchenko, V. Constraints on decay-

ing dark matter from XMM–Newton observations of M31. Monthly Notices of the Royal

Astronomical Society, 387(4):1361–1373, 2008

[87] Abazajian, K. N., Acero, M., Agarwalla, S., Aguilar-Arevalo, A., Albright, C. et al. Light

sterile neutrinos: a white paper. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.5379, 2012

[88] Perez, K., Ng, K. C., Beacom, J. F., Hersh, C., Horiuchi, S. et al. Almost closing the ν MSM

sterile neutrino dark matter window with NuSTAR. Physical Review D, 95(12):123002, 2017

[89] Adhikari, R., Agostini, M., Ky, N. A., Araki, T., Archidiacono, M. et al. A white paper on keV

sterile neutrino dark matter. Journal of cosmology and astroparticle physics, 2017(01):025,

2017

[90] Meiksin, A. A. Publisher’s Note: The physics of the intergalactic medium [Rev. Mod. Phys.

81, 1405 (2009)]. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(4):1943, 2009

[91] Boyarsky, A., Lesgourgues, J., Ruchayskiy, O., and Viel, M. Realistic sterile neutrino dark

matter with keV mass does not contradict cosmological bounds. Physical review letters,

102(20):201304, 2009

[92] Baur, J., Palanque-Delabrouille, N., Yeche, C., Boyarsky, A., Ruchayskiy, O. et al. Constraints

from Ly-α forests on non-thermal dark matter including resonantly-produced sterile neutrinos.

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017(12):013, 2017

[93] Boyarsky, A., Lesgourgues, J., Ruchayskiy, O., and Viel, M. Lyman-α constraints on warm

and on warm-plus-cold dark matter models. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics,

2009(05):012, 2009

[94] Giganti, C., Lavignac, S., and Zito, M. Neutrino oscillations: the rise of the PMNS paradigm.

Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics, 2017

42

[95] Nath, N., Ghosh, M., Goswami, S., and Gupta, S. Phenomenological study of extended

seesaw model for light sterile neutrino. Journal of High Energy Physics, 2017(3), 2017. ISSN

1029-8479

[96] Abada, A., De Romeri, V., Lucente, M., Teixeira, A. M., and Toma, T. Effective Majorana

mass matrix from tau and pseudoscalar meson lepton number violating decays. JHEP, 02:169,

2018

[97] Awasthi, R. L., Parida, M. K., and Patra, S. Neutrinoless double beta decay and pseudo-Dirac

neutrino mass predictions through inverse seesaw mechanism. 2013

[98] Ishimori, H., Kobayashi, T., Ohki, H., Okada, H., Shimizu, Y. et al. An introduction to

non-Abelian discrete symmetries for particle physicists, volume 858. Springer, 2012

[99] Steigman, G., Dasgupta, B., and Beacom, J. F. Precise relic WIMP abundance and its impact

on searches for dark matter annihilation. Physical Review D, 86(2):023506, 2012

[100] DâĂŹEramo, F. and Thaler, J. Semi-annihilation of dark matter. Journal of High Energy

Physics, 2010(6):109, 2010

[101] Kolb, E. The early universe. CRC Press, 2018

43

nayana gautam and mrinal kumar das - arxiv · phenomenologyofkevscalesterileneutrinodarkmatterwiths...

Documents