national chlamydia coalition 2010 evaluation
DESCRIPTION
Presented by Sonal Doshi, Health Scientist, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Victoria Beltran, ORISE Fellow, Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, at the 2010 National Chlamydia Coalition meeting.TRANSCRIPT
Victoria Beltran, DSTDP/HSREBSonal R. Doshi, DSTDP/HSREB
National Chlamydia Coalition MeetingOctober 28, 2010
National Chlamydia Coalition 2010 Evaluation
Division of STD Prevention
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD & TB Prevention 1
Overview
Background Purpose Methods
CDC Evaluation Framework Evaluation Sub-Committee Evaluation Focus Timeline
Where We Are Now Next Steps
2
Background There is a movement towards increasing
use of coalitions in public health Few studies exist documenting
effectiveness of coalitions Fewer models exist to evaluate
effectiveness of coalition work in public health
No studies exist evaluating effectiveness of coalitions focused on STDs
3
Purpose Evaluate the effectiveness of the NCC,
including its internal operations and impact of the coalition on members and other stakeholders Document key factors that have contributed to NCC’s
success Document the process of coalition development so that
lessons learned can be used for developing future coalitions
Highlight strengths and accomplishments of NCC to inform for example, additional potential funders, internal and external to CDC
4
Methods: CDC Evaluation Framework
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Framework for Program Evaluation in Public Health. MMWR 1999;48(No. RR-11).
5
Methods: Evaluation Sub-committee
NCCKeith Barton, MD
Policy and Advocacy Committee
Gail Burstein, MD, MPH, FAAP Provider Education CommitteeResearch Committee*
Yvonne Hamby, MPH Public Awareness Committee
Karen Shea, WHNP-BC Provider Education Committee
Partnership for Prevention
Christianne Johnson, MA, CHESSusan Maloney, MHSAlana Ward, MPP, MST
CDC/DSTDP StaffVictoria Beltran, MPH, CHESSonal R. Doshi, MS, MPHPenny Loosier, MA, MPHRaul Romaguera, DMD, MPH
* Requests for subcommittee volunteers was prior to Research Committee formation
6
Methods: Evaluation Focus
Process evaluation: document whether a program has been implemented as intended—“implementation fidelity”— and why or why not? To document the level of success in achieving objectives To identify areas of the program that need improvement To improve the content of the program’s materials To solicit more funds or additional partners
http://www.cdc.gov/eval/evalguide.pdf
7
Methods: Timeline
8
Where We Are Now
Member survey is open on Zoomerang Open until MONDAY NOVEMBER 1, 2010
Recruit participants for interviews Conduct phone interviews with select members in
November
9
Next Steps
Analyze member survey results Conduct phone interviews
Analyze results Complete final version of logic model Prepare evaluation report for subcommittee
feedback Revise as necessary
10
For more information please contact Centers for Disease Control and Prevention1600 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30333Telephone, 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636)/TTY: 1-888-232-6348E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.cdc.gov
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Thank you!Questions? Comments?
For more information, please contact: Sonal R. Doshi Victoria Beltran
[email protected] or [email protected] 404-639-6209 404-639-8270
National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD & TB Prevention
Division of STD Prevention 11