nassp masters 5003f - computational astronomy - 2009 lecture 18 x-ray instrumentation and...
TRANSCRIPT
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Lecture 18
• X-ray instrumentation and calibration (mostly XMM).
• XMM users’ guide:– http://xmm.esac.esa.int/external/xmm_user_
support/documentation/uhb/index.html
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
XMM-Newton• 3 x-ray EPIC
telescopes– European Photon
Imaging Cameras.– 2 of these have:
• MOS detectors• Reflection Grating
Arrays (RGAs)
– The 3rd has• a pn detector• No RGA.
• Mirrors all the same– nested Wolter– f ~ 7 m. Schematic of the satellite
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Attitude• The orientation of the spacecraft in the sky is
called its attitude.• It isn’t just the direction it points to, attitude
specifies the roll angle as well.– One way to define this is via a pointing vector and a
parallactic angle.• However, as with any trigonometric system, this has
problems at poles.
– Better is to define a Cartesian coordinate frame of 3 orthogonal vectors.
• Each vector defined by direction cosines in the sky frame.• Attitude is then an attitude matrix A.• This is isotropic (no trouble at poles).• Easy to convert between different reference frames.
– Whatever you do, avoid messing about with Euler angles. Ugh.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Sky frame or basis.
x at RA=0
y at RA=6 hr
z at dec=90°
Unless you have good reasonnot to, always construct aCartesian basis according tothe Right-Hand Rule:
xy screws toward z;yz screws toward x;zx screws toward y.
“Direction cosines” really justmeans Cartesian coordinates.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Boresights• Ideally, each instrument on a satellite
would be perfectly aligned with the spacecraft coordinate axes.
• In real life, there is always some misalignment. This is called the boresight of the instrument (I think it is an old artillery term).
• Define a set of Cartesian axes for each instrument.
• Components of these axes in the spacecraft reference system (basis) form the boresight matrix for that instrument.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Boresights• With these matrices, conversion between
coordinate systems is easy. Suppose we have an x-ray detection which has a position vector v in the instrument frame. If we want to find where in the sky that x-ray came from, we first have to express this vector in the sky frame Cartesian system (new vector = u). This is simple:
• Then all we need to do is calculate
• QED.
vBAu 11
222atan and 2atan yxzxy uu,udec,uuRA
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Attitude and boresights• NOTE that attitude varies with time as the
spacecraft slews from target to target – but there is ALSO attitude jitter within an observation.– XMM has a star tracker to measure the attitude.
• Attitude samples are available at 10 second intervals.
• So to build up a sky picture from x-ray positions in the instrument frame, one has to change to a new attitude matrix whenever the deviation grows too large.
• Boresights can also change with time, due to flexion of the structure, but this is slow.– Calibration teams measure them from time to time.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Other coordinate systems:
• The fundamental spatial coord system is the chip coordinate system – in CCD pixels.
• Note that for time and energy as well as in the spatial coordinates, coordinate values are ultimately pixellized or discrete.– This defines the uncertainty with which they
are known (to ±half the pixel width).– Rebinning can give rise to Moiré effects
(somewhat similar to aliasing in the Fourier world).
• ‘Dithering’ can avoid this.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Moiré example:
Original binned data: bin widths are 2 units.
Re-binned data: bin widths are 3.5 units. Moiré effect causes a dipevery 4th bin (since 4 is the smallest integer n such that nx3.5 is exactlydivisible by 2).
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
EPIC telescope schematic(not to scale)
MOS
pn
Mirror assemblies
Optic axis
Optic axis
ReflectionGrating Array
Reflection GratingSpectrometer
Filter wheel
Mask
CCDs
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Mirror effects: PSF• No mirror system of finite aperture can
produce a perfectly sharp image.• Rather, each point source is smeared out
(convolved) by a Point Spread Function (PSF).
• More usual, high F-number optics produce a PSF which is reasonably independent of off-axis angle;
• This isn’t true for x-ray grazing-incidence optics.– For both XMM and Chandra, the PSF varies
markedly with off-axis angle.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Mirror effects: PSF
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Mirror effects: PSF• XMM PSF is
complicated.– Asymmetrical core.– Inner ‘star’.– Outer wings with
shadows from the mirror ‘spider’.
– RGA streak.
• The average radial profile is best described by a King function:
– r0, α depend on energy.
2
0
King1 rr
ArS
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Mirror effects: vignetting.
• The mirror assemblies have a small ‘acceptance angle’ – transmitted flux drops by a factor of 2 to 3 (it’s energy dependent!) from optic axis to outside of field of view (FOV).
• The ratio of transmittance at any position on the detector plane to that at the optic axis is called the vignetting function.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
X-ray interaction with matter• Can break it into continuum and resonant.• Both sorts generate ions.
– ‘Continuum’ absorption scales with• Density• 1/E.
– Resonant absorption:• electron is kicked out from an inner orbital.
X-ray
Atom
+
e-
+
KLM
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Resonant absorption continued:• Because it is an inner orbital, doesn’t much matter
if atom is in a gas or a solid. The inner orbitals are pretty well insulated from the outside world.
• X-ray must have energy >= the amount needed to just ionize the electron.
– Hence: absorption edges located at energies characteristic of that orbital (labelled eg K or L) and that element.
X-ray energy
Absorption
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
EPIC cameras• MOS:
– “Front-illuminated” – means that the charge detection and movement electronics are on the illuminated surface (same as the retina).
– This means that• pixels can be smaller (1.1”);• the MOS cameras are not very sensitive to soft x-rays (because
these are absorbed in the electronics before reaching the detection substrate);
• they’re not very sensitive to hard x-rays either (because the substrate is too thin to absorb many).
– 7 chips (each 600x600 pixels square) in a hexagonal array, staggered in height to (very roughly) follow the curved focal surface.
• This causes slight shadowing of the edges of the central chip by the others.
– Readout time is ~2 seconds (full window imaging mode).
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
EPIC cameras
• pn:– “Back-illuminated” – the charge detection and
movement electronics are on the rear. X-rays strike the detection substrate first.
– This means that• pixels have to be larger (4.1”);• the pn camera is sensitive to x-rays over a much
wider bandwidth than MOS.
– 9 ‘chips’, 200x64 rectangles, but all on the same rigid squarish block of silicon.
– Readout time (in normal imaging mode) is ~ 0.07 seconds (much faster than MOS).
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
X-rays to events.• It isn’t as simple as 1 CCD pixel per
incident x-ray.– Each x-ray creates a charge cloud of
electrons, with a certain radius.– The charge cloud can overlap more than 1
pixel.– Thus patterns of excited pixels which
correspond to a single x-ray have to be identified;
• then all charge from that set of pixels must be added up total energy of the x-ray.
– Each recognized pattern is called an event.– What XMM calls patterns, Chandra calls
grades.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Example MOS patterns
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
X-rays to events.
• Complications:– X-rays are not the only things which can
cause ionization in the chips: can also have cosmic rays.
• However, these tend, on average, to produce elongated electron clouds.
– These patterns are easy to filter out.– What can’t be avoided however is a slight loss of
detection capability – where a cosmic ray has struck, an x-ray can’t also be detected (for that frame). See later discussion of exposure.
– Dead or ‘hot’ CCD pixels.– Chip edges.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Out Of Time Events (OOTEs)• As said last lecture, CCDs (at least in
imaging mode) are operated in a cyclic fashion.
• Each cycle (called a frame) is composed of an integration interval followed by a readout interval.
• But! X-ray cameras don’t have shutters! So even during the readout part of the frame, as the rows are being shunted towards the base of the CCD, x-rays are being absorbed.– This results in a vertical smearing of all the x-
rays absorbed during this time.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
OOTEs continued• The MOS chips use a more complicated
readout strategy:– Each chip has in fact twice as many pixels as
‘advertised’.– The extra pixels (which can be made much
smaller, since they don’t have to detect x-rays, just hold charge) are located behind an x-ray absorbing shield.
– The readout phase is divided into 2 parts:• a quick phase during which all the exposed rows are
shunted into this frame store;• a slow phase during which the frame store is read out
to the ADC.
• Result: MOS have far fewer OOTEs.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
OOTEs continued
Bright pn OOTEs Faint MOS OOTEs
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Pileup
• Earlier it was said that, in order to preserve the relation between charge size and x-ray energy, the frame time had to be short enough for the probability of 2 x-rays landing on the same pixel, same frame to be small.
• It does happen, however... and obviously the brighter the source, the more likely it is.
• The phenomenon is known as pileup.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Pileup• Because of patterns, interaction between 2
events is difficult to calculate (but has been done however).
• Broadly speaking, 2 piled-up photons look like a single photon of the sum of their energies.– This mucks up the spectrum of the source.
• Many piled-up events generate ‘cosmic ray-like’ patterns and are thus discarded.– MOS diagonal doubles are a good diagnostic.
• Heavy pileup leads to the event energy being greater than the accepted cutoff – these events are then also discarded.– The result is that ‘holes’ are seen at the centres of
very bright sources.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Other modes of operating the CCDs• So far what has been described is full-
window imaging mode.• But there are at least 2 other modes:
– Small-window imaging mode.• If we’re prepared to sacrifice some imaging area,
we can have a shorter frame time.– A way to image very bright sources while avoiding
pileup.
• See timing diagram next slide...
– Timing mode. In this mode, the CCD is read out continually much finer time resolution. This only works where the x-ray flux is dominated by a single bright source.
• The pn has an additional ‘burst mode’ which can give time resolution down to 7 μs.
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Shift and discard rows 1 to 250 (quick)
Shift and discard rows 351 to 600 (quick)
Shift and read rows 251 to 350 (slow)
Shift and discard pixels 1 to 250 (quick)
Shift and discard pixels 351 to 600 (quick)
Shift to ADC pixels 251 to 350 (slow)Integrate
100x100 MOS small window mode example:
NASSP Masters 5003F - Computational Astronomy - 2009
Windowed imaging examples