nano science and engineering and...
TRANSCRIPT
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion NANO SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
and MECHANICSby
Ken P. Chong PhD, PE, Hon. M.ASCE, F.AAM
Interim Division DirectorCivil & Mechanical Systems Division
Director of Mechanics & Materials
National Science Foundation
www.nsf.gov
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
National Science FoundationFY2005 Request – ($5.7B) and ’05 Increases
National Science Board
Director
Office of theInspector General
Staff Offices
Directorate forEngineering
Directorate forBiologicalSciences
Directorate forGeosciences
Directorate forComputer and
InformationScience andEngineering
Directorate forMathematicaland Physical
Sciences
Directorate forSocial,
Behavioral,and Economic
Sciences
Directorate forEducation and
HumanResources
($13.0M) $600M ($13.4M) $618M ($-167.6M) $771M
($10.3M) $472M ($15.4M) $729M ($24.0M) $1,116M ($20.9M) $225M
Polar and Antarctic Programs
($7.6) $350M
IntegrativeActivities
(MRI, STC)
($95.9) $240M
SBIR/STTR
($0.5M) $104M
NSF Engineering DirectorateFY2005 Request
Assistant Director John A. Brighton
Deputy Assistant DirectorMichael Reischman
Design,Manufacture &
Industrial InnovationDMII
Civil &Mechanical
SystemsCMS
Electrical &Communications
SystemsECS
EngineeringEducation &
CentersEEC
Bioengineering & Environmental
SystemsBES
Vasu Varadan Gary Gabriele Warren DeVries
Bruce Hamilton Ken Chong Richard Buckius
Senior Advisor
Mike Roco
($10.3M) $471.8M
SBIR/STTR*SBIR/STTR*
Kesh Narayanan
*NSF-wide program – now changed to Office of Industrial Innovation
($-1.3M) $49.8M ($18.3M) $85.5M ($0.5M) $68.9M)
Chemical &TransportSystems
CTS
Chemical &TransportSystems
CTS($-1.7M) $67.2M
($-1.9M) $72.7M($0.1M) $65.9M ($-3.3M) $130.7M($0.5M) $104.1M
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
M. ROCO, ~2002
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
Example for an agency
National Nanotechnology Initiative Coordination
Independent Agencies (8)
EPA, FDA,
NASA, NIH,
NIOSH, NRC,
NSF, ITIC
Independent Agencies (8)
EPA, FDA,
NASA, NIH,
NIOSH, NRC,
NSF, ITIC
Departments (9)
DOC / NIST, DOD,
DOE, DOJ,
DOS, DOT,
DOTreas, DHS,
USDA
Departments (9)
DOC / NIST, DOD,
DOE, DOJ,
DOS, DOT,
DOTreas, DHS,
USDA
NSTC / NSETNanoscale Science, Engineering and Technology Subcommittee
NSF
NNCONNCO
NSE Group
NSE Group
NIRT, NSEC, NER, NSEE, NNIN, NCN,
Nano in Core
NIRT, NSEC, NER, NSEE, NNIN, NCN,
Nano in Core
OMBOMB PCASTPCASTIndustryIndustry
StatesStates
International organizations
International organizations
Working Groups Working Groups
White House/ OSTP/ CT
PublicPublic
MediaMedia
SMIG/engSMIG/eng
BudgetBudget
COVCOV
AcademeAcademe
IndustryIndustry
OLPAOLPA
ProfOrgProfOrg
Internat.Internat.
CONGRESSCONGRESSAcademeAcademe
Coordinates NNI Coordinates NNI N
atio
nal S
cien
ce F
ound
atio
n
Fiscal year 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005(all in million $) Actual Enact/Actual Enact/Actual Enact/Actual Req./Actual Req/Est.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NSF 97 150 /150 199 /204 221 /221 249 /256 305/338DOD 70 110 /125 180 /224 243 /322 222 /291 276/257DOE 58 93 /88 91.1 /89 133 /134 197 /202 211/210HHS 32 39 /39.6 40.8 /59 65 /78 70 /108 89/145NASA 5 20 /22 35 /35 33 /36 31 /47 35/45NIST 8 10 /33.4 37.6 /77 66 /64 62 /77 53/75EPA - /5.8 5 /6 5 /5 5 /5 5/5
Homeland Security (TSA) - 2 /2 2 /1 2 /1 1/1Department of Agriculture - /1.5 1.5 /0 1 /1 10 /2 5/3Department of Justice - /1.4 1.4 /1 1.4 /1 1.4 /2 1/2
Congressional ads-ons at DOD 80 103 150TOTAL 270 422422 /465 600600 /697 770770 /942 849849 /1094 982/982/12311231
+72% +50% +35% +16% + 13%- Industry, state and local organizations: about 1.5 times NNI budget in 2003
- 22 NSET departments / agencies, including: OSTP, NSTC, OMB, DOC, DOS, DOT, DOTreas, FDA, NRC, DHS, IC, NIOSH, USPTO; partnerships with others- 2004 NNI budget: 65% to academia; 25% - R&D labs; 10% - industry (7% SBIR)
MC Roco
First NNI strategic plan (2001-2005):R&D funding by Agency
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion Sampling of Current Regional, State, & Local Initiatives
in Nanotechnology
California NanoSystem
Institute (CNSI)
Northern CA Nano Initiative
Connecticut Nanotechnology
Initiative
Atomworks
Girvan Institute
Nanotechnology Center at Ga Tech
Massachusetts Nanotechnology
Initiative
Enterprise Florida
Nanoscience Center
NanoScience Institute of the West;
CA, OR, WA
Oklahoma Nano-technology
Initiative
Nanotech Center
Consortium: UNM & Nat. Labs
Colorado Nano-Technology
Initiative (CNTI)
Center for Accelerating
Applications at the Nanoscale
Arizona Biodesign Institute (AzBio)
USC NanoCenter
Nanotech Inst Ben Franklin Tech Partnership;
PA, NJ, DE, MD
Michigan Small Tech Association
NanoBusiness Alliance
Albany Nanotech
New Jersey Nanotechnology
Consortium
Texas Nano-
technology Initiative
Inst for Nanotechnology In Virginia (INanoVA
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
U. Washington U. Minnesota U. Michigan Cornell
Harvard
Penn State
Howard
NCState/TNLC
Georgia Tech
U. Texas-AustinU. New Mexico
U.C. Santa Barbara
Stanford
National Nanotechnology National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN)Infrastructure Network (NNIN)
��������������� ������������������������������
~70M funding
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
Changing R&D focus in 2004
� Growing area, from discovery to technological innovation� Materials, including bulk, coating, dispersed
systems � Chemicals, including catalysts� Pharmaceuticals� Electronics
� Emerging areas in 2003 (support in FY 2004)� Nanomedicine� Energy conversion and storage� Agriculture and food systems� Molecular architectures� Realistic multiphenomena/multiscale simulations� Environmental implications� Converging technologies from the nanoscale
MC. Roco, 3/01/03
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
EDUCATION• 10-12 m QUANTUM MECHANICS [TB, DFT, HF…]
• 10-9 MOLECULAR DYN. [LJ…]; NANOMECHANICS;MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; BIOPHYSICS
• 10-6 ELASTICITY; PLASTICITY; DISLOCATION...
• 10-3 MECHANICS OF MATERIALS
• 10-0 STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS
MULTI-SCALE ANALYSES & SIMULATIONS…____________________________________________________________TB = TIGHT BINDING METHOD; DFT = DENSITY FTNAL THEORY;
HF = HATREE-FOCK APPROX.; LJ = LENNARD JONES POTENTIAL
• NSF SUMMER INSTITUTE OF NANOMECHANICS & MAT’LS, NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY –contact: PROF. W.K. LIU
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion DISCUSSIONS OF COMMON
MODELING METHODS• FIRST PRINCIPLE CALCULATIONS - TO SOLVE
SCHRODINGER’S EQ. AB INITIO, e.g. HATREE- FOCK APPROX., DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY,…
- COMPUTIONAL INTENSIVE, O(N4)- UP TO ~ 3000 ATOMS
• MOLECULAR DYNAMICS [MD] - DETERMINISTIC, e.g. W/ LENNARD JONES POTENTIAL- MILLIONS TIMESTEPS OF INTEGRATION; TEDIOUS- UP TO ~ BILLION ATOMS FOR NANO-SECONDS
• COMBINED MD & CONTINUUM MECHANICS [CM], e.g. MAAD; LSU; BRIDGING SCALE; …- PROMISING...
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
Gecko: nano-scale attachment (K. Autumn et al. 2002)
G. Huber
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, ASME, DEC. 2001
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion www.nsf.gov
Chong, K. P., “Research and Challenges inNanomechanics” 90-minute NanotechnologyWebcast, ASME, Oct. 2002; archived in www.asme.org/nanowebcast
Boresi, A. P., and Chong, K. P., Elasticity in Engineering Mechanics, John Wiley, 2000
NSF SUMMER INSTITUTE ON NANO MECHANICS & MATERIALShttp://tam.northwestern.edu/summerinstitute/Home.htm
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion Defining the vision and implementation planDefining the vision and implementation plan
National Nanotechnology InitiativeNational Nanotechnology Initiative
ReportsReports
Planning with feedback after each: 5 years, 1 year, 1 month; and various levels: national/NSET, agency, program
In preparation: Topical reports; new 2004:10 year vision
1999: 10-year vision
MC. Roco, 10/09/03
Worldwidebenchmark
Brochure forpublic
Societalimplications
Govtplan
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion Defining the vision for the second strategic plan (II)Defining the vision for the second strategic plan (II)
National Nanotechnology InitiativeNational Nanotechnology Initiative20042004
ReportsReports
2004: Update 10 year vision, and develop strategic plan
2004: 10-year
vision/plan Agricultureand Food
Energy
SocietalImplications
2004
GovernmentPlan (annual) Survey
manufacturing
MC Roco, 3/16/05
Other topical reportson www.nano.gov
Nat
iona
l Sci
ence
Fou
ndat
ion
DISCLAIMER
The author would like to thank his colleagues and many members of the research communities for their comments and input during the writing of this presentation.Information on NSF initiatives, announcements and awards can be found in the NSF website: www.nsf.gov. The opinions expressed in this article are the author’s only, not necessarily those of the National Science Foundation. Any commercial products identified are for llustrations only, do not imply any endorsement.