nab-paclitaxel development in gynecologic malignancies robert coleman, md, facog, facs director of...

25
Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology MD Anderson Cancer Center

Upload: henry-morris

Post on 11-Jan-2016

219 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies

Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACSDirector of Clinical Research

Department of Gynecologic OncologyMD Anderson Cancer Center

Page 2: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Nab-paclitaxel Gynecologic Malignancy Trials with Enrollment Complete

Study Description Principal Investigator

Status

nab-paclitaxel in Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer

M. Teneriello 47 pts

Published JCO 2009

nab-paclitaxel + Carboplatin in Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer

B. Benigno 38 pts / 1 active

nab-paclitaxel in Recurrent or Persistent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

R. Coleman 49 pts / 2 active

Final data analysis pending

Current data from 41 pts

nab-paclitaxel + Avastin in Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

T. Tillmanns 48 pts / 2 active

Page 3: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Primary endpoints: Response Rate

Secondary endpoints: Progression Free and Overall Survival, Quality of Life, Safety

Phase II Evaluation of Nab-paclitaxel in Platinum-Sensitive Patients with Recurrent Ovarian, Peritoneal, or Fallopian

Tube Cancer

Teneriello, JCO 2009

Key Eligibility

• Measurable disease by RECIST or elevated CA-125 ( > 70 U/mL)

• Prior platinum-based chemotherapy

• Platinum treatment-free interval >6 months

n=47

nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2 on Day 1 q Q3W

x 6 cycles or

8 cycles if patient achieved CR

Page 4: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Patient Characteristics

Number of Patients Enrolled 47

Age, mean (Range) 66 (42 – 84)

n %

ECOG Performance Status01

389

8119

Prior TherapyPrior taxanePrior Chemotherapy > 12 monthsPrior Chemotherapy < 12 monthsSurgery

42434

44

90929

94

Site of Primary DiseaseEpithelial OvarianFallopian TubePeritoneum

3719

792

19

Stage at Baseline IC/IIB/IICIII/IIIA/IIIBIIICIV

47

2511

9155223

Teneriello JCO 2009

Page 5: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Efficacy Data64% Response Rate with Nab-paclitaxel

Monotherapy

Total Number of Eligible/Treated Subjects 44

n (%) 95% CI

Best ResponseComplete ResponsePartial ResponseStable Disease

SD > 6 monthsSD < 6 months

Progressive DiseaseClinical Benefit (CR + PR + SD > 6 months)Non-evaluable

15 (34%)13 (30%)14 (32%)6 (14%)8 (18%)2 (5%)

34 (77%)3

(20.1 – 48.1)(16.1 – 43.0)(18.1 – 45.6)

(0 – 10.7)

Time to Response, median (months) Range

1.3(0.5 – 4.8)

Duration of Response, median (months)Range

7.9(2.7 – 17.6) (6.7 –10.5)

Progression-free Survival, median (months) 8.5

Teneriello JCO 2009

Page 6: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Safety Data: Adverse Events

Most Common Grade 3/4 AEs

All Grade

n (%)

Grade 3

n (%)

Grade 4

n (%)

Hematological

Neutropenia 20 (47%) 6 (13%) 5 (11%)

Leukopenia 7 (15%) 6 (13%) --

Non-hematological

Neuropathy 6 (13%) 4 (9%) --

Fatigue 10 (22%) 1 (2%) --

Diarrhea 3 (7%) 1 (2%) --

Abdominal pain 2 (4%) 1 (2%) --

Pneumonia 2 (4%) 1 (2%) --

Upper respiratory tract

infection

2 (4%) 1 (2%) --

Generalized weakness

2 (4%) 1 (2%) --

Alopecia 40 (87%) -- --

Teneriello JCO 2009

Page 7: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Primary endpoints: Antitumor activity and safety

Secondary endpoints: Progression-free survival and overall survival

Phase II Study of nab-paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin in Patients with Recurrent Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian or Primary

Peritoneal Cancer

Benigno

Key Eligibility

• Recurrent ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer

• Platinum-sensitive• Measurable

disease

n = 41

nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2

Days 1, 8, 15 q 28 days+

Carboplatin AUC 5 or 6 Day 1 q 28 days

x 6 cycles

Continue nab-paclitaxel until

progressive disease or

PI-PT discretion

Page 8: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Patient Characteristics

Number of Patients Enrolled 40 (38 evaluable)

Age, mean (Range) 62 (42 - 81)

n %

ECOG Performance Status01

355

8713

Prior TherapyPrior taxane / platinumPrior chemotherapy > 12 monthsPrior chemotherapy < 12 months

401425

1003563

Site of Primary DiseaseEpithelial OvarianFallopian Tube

391

982

Stage at Baseline IIB / IIC / IIIBIIICIV

9283

23707

Benigno

Page 9: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Dosing Information

Treatment Cycles Completed

>18 cyclesn (%)

13-17 cyclesn (%)

7-12 cyclesn (%)

6 cyclesn (%)

< 6 cyclesn (%)

Evaluable Patients38 TOTAL

51 pt active

4 10 14 5

Reason for Discontinuing

Phys or Pt discretion

Progressive disease

Toxicitiy

Type/ cycle

2

2

0

2

2

0

6

4

0

10

3

1

(G4 neurotoxity

cycle 6)

0

3

2

(G4 pneumonia cycle 5,

G3 hem cycle 4)

Benigno

• Carboplatin dose AUC 6 administered to first 9 patients• After Grade 4 neutropenia in 3 patients, reduced carboplatin to AUC 5• 20 patients discontinued treatment for reasons other than toxicity or disease

progression

Page 10: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Safety Data: Adverse Events

Most Common Grade 3/4 AEs

Grade 3

n (%)

Grade 4

n (%)

Hematological

Neutropenia 14 (34%) 3 (7%)

Anemia 4 (10%) --

Thrombocytopenia 2 (5%) --

Non-hematological

Fatigue 13 (32%) --

Carboplatin reaction 7 (17%) --

Nausea 2 (5%) --

Constipation 1 (2%) --

Fever 1 (2%) --

Shortness of breath 1 (2%) --

Neuropathy -- 1 (2%)

Benigno

Page 11: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Efficacy Data: SurvivalOver 50% of patients alive at 1-year

Survival Rates

1-Year 56%

2-Year 39%

• Until 9/18/2009, there are 18 patients alive, 21 are dead and one is UNK due to lost of FU, one still active on cycle 44

Benigno

Page 12: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Primary endpoints: Antitumor activity and safety

Secondary endpoints: Progression Free and Overall Survival

Phase II Evaluation of nab-paclitaxel in Recurrent or Persistent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, or

Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Key Eligibility

• Recurrent or persistent ovarian, peritoneal, fallopian tube carcinoma

• Platinum-resistant or refractory

• Paclitaxel-resistant or refractory

• Measurable disease

n = 49

nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, 15 q 28

Treatment until disease progression or

unacceptable toxicity

R.Coleman

Page 13: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Patient Characteristics

Age:

– 50-59 15 (36.6%)

– 60-69 14 (34.1%)

– 30-49 7 (17 %)

– 70-79 5 (12.2%) Performance Status:

– 0 28 (68.3%)

– 1 12 (29.3%)

– 2 1 ( 2.4%) Prior Therapy

– 1 Reg. 41 (100%)

– Immunoth 1

– Hormonal 2

Race:

– White 30 (73.2%)

– African American 8 (19.5%)

– Hispanic 2 ( 4.9%)

– Am Indian 1 ( 2.4%)

Site of Disease

– Ovary 35 (85.4%)

– Fallopian Tube 1 ( 2.4%)

– Peritoneum 5 (12.2%) Grade

– 1 5 (12.2%)

– 2 2 ( 4.9%)

– 3 34 (82.9%)

Cell Type:

– Serous Adeno 29 (72%)

R.Coleman

Page 14: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Efficacy Data23% Response Rate with nab-paclitaxel

Monotherapy

Responses reported in 41 of 49 patients: 8 patients still to be evaluated

N %

Responses

Partial Response 11 23.4

Stable Disease 17 36.2

Progressive Disease 17 36.1

Indeterminate 2 4.3

PFS > 6mo

No 30 63.8

Yes 16 34.0

Pending 1 2.1

R.Coleman

Page 15: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Status of Patients by Cycles Completed55% of patients received more than 3 cycles

# of Cycles Received n %

R.Coleman

Page 16: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Efficacy Data: Overall Survival and Progression-free Survival

R.Coleman

Progression-free Survival, median: 4.5 months Overall survival, median: 18.5 months

Page 17: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Safety Data: Adverse Events

No grade 4 toxicities Only 1 patient grade 3 neurosensory toxicity

AE, adverse event

Toxicity / Adverse Events

41 of 49 pts

Maximum grade, no. of patients

1 2 3 4

Hematological

anemia 20 (49%) 17 (41%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%)

neutropenia 4 (10%) 5 (12%) 5 (12%) 0 (0%)

leukopenia 16 (39%) 8 (20%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%)

thrombocytopenia 3 (7%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

Non-hematological

neurosensory 11 (27%) 3 (7%) 1 (2%) 0 (0%)

constitutional 20 (49%) 10 (24%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)

gastrointestinal 18 (44%) 7 (17%) 2 (5%) 0 (0%)

metabolic 7 (17%) 2 (5%) 2 (5%) 0 (0%)

pain 10 (24%) 0 (0%) 2 (5%) 0 (0%)

R.Coleman

Page 18: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

GOG Phase II Trials in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: Active Agents (126 Queue)

Regimen n RR PFS Median OS Number of Cycles

Toxicity

Paclitaxel Weekly

80mg/m2

49 21% 3.6 mo 13 mo Up to 13 cycles

5 patients discontinued for toxicity

Docetaxel 100mg/m2

q3w

58 22.4% 2.5 mo NR ANC: 75% Gr IV

Febrile: 30%

Dose reduction: 36%

Neuro: 3 grade III

Pemetrexed

900mg/m2 q3w

51 21% 2.9 mo 11.4 mo Grade 3/4

neutropenia 42%

leukopenia 25%

nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2

weekly

D1, 8, 15 of q4w

48

7 not yet

reported

2 active

23.4% 4.5 mo 18.5 mo 2 Patients are still being treated Cycle 21

No Grade 4 toxicity

No treatment related deaths

Page 19: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Primary endpoints: Duration of objective response, safety

Secondary endpoints: Duration of progression-free survival, overall survival, quality of life

Phase II Study of Nab-paclitaxel with Bevacizumab in Patients with Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Primary Epithelial

Ovarian or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

Tillmans

Key Eligibility

• Recurrent or persistent ovarian, peritoneal cancer

• Platinum-resistant within 6 months

• Measurable disease

n = 48

Nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8, 15

+Bevacizumab 10mg/kg

Days 1, 15 Q28d

Treatment until disease progression or

unacceptable toxicity

Page 20: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Efficacy Data48% response rate with

Nab-paclitaxel + Bevacizumab

Best Overall Response

Not Done PD PR SD

Treatment Cycle n % n % n % n %

4 16 33.3 19 39.6 13 27.1

7 16 33.3 21 43.8 11 22.9

10 16 33.3 22 45.8 10 20.8

13 16 33.3 22 45.8 10 20.8

16 16 33.3 22 45.8 10 20.8

19 16 33.3 22 45.8 10 20.8

22 16 33.3 22 45.8 10 20.8

25 16 33.3 22 45.8 10 20.8

28 16 33.3 22 45.8 10 20.8

EOS All Pts 5 10.4 8 16.7 23 47.9 12 25.0

EOS Pts off study 1 26 8 20.5 18 46.1 12 30.8

Tillmanns

Response rate: 48% Stable Disease: 25%

Page 21: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Efficacy: Progression-free Survival

Median Progression-free Survival: 8.26 months

Tillmanns

Page 22: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Safety Data: Grade 3 / 4 Adverse Events*

Most Common Grade 3/4 AEs* All Grade

n (%)

Grade 3

n (%)

Grade 4

n (%)

Hematological

Neutropenia 13 (27%) 5 (10%) --

Anemia 11 (23%) 1 (2%) --

Non-hematological

Abdominal pain 17 (35%) 3 (6%) --

Bowel obstruction 17 (35%) 4 (8%) 2 (4%)

Cardiac disorder 11 (23%) -- 1 (2%)

Fatigue 35 (73%) 2 (4%) --

GU / renal 7 (15%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%)

Infections 8 (17%) 4 (8%) --

Metabolism disorders 18 (38%) 2 (4%) --

Other blood / lymphatic system disorders 16 (33%) 2 (4%) --

Other gastrointestinal disorders 29 (60%) 6 (13%) --

Vascular disorders 12 (25%) 3 (6%) --

Neuropathy 14 (29%) -- --

* One Death, NOS Tillmanns

Page 23: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Phase II Single Agent Bevacizumab Efficacy and Safety

GOG 170-DBurger et al

N = 62

Cannistra et al*N = 44

ORR 13 (21%) 7 (15.9%)

6 Month PFS 40.3% 27.8%

≥ Grade 3 Toxicity

GI Perforation - 5 (11.4%)

Thrombosis / Embolism1 (1.6%)

(Venous)

4 (9.0%)

(3 Arterial 1 VTE)

HTN 6 (9.7%) 6 (13.6%)

Cerebral ischemia - 1 (2.3%)

Proteinuria 1 (1.6%) -

Death Suspected as Related to Bevacizumab

- 3 (6.8%)

*Trial terminated prematurely due to incidence of GI perforation.*Trial terminated prematurely due to incidence of GI perforation.

Burger RA, et al. Burger RA, et al. J Clin OncolJ Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5165-5167; Cannistra SA, et al. . 2007;25(33):5165-5167; Cannistra SA, et al. J Clin Oncol.J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5180-5186. 2007;25(33):5180-5186.

Page 24: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Nab-paclitaxel Gynecologic Malignancy Trials Ongoing

Study Description Principal Investigator

Status

nab-paclitaxel + GM-CSF in Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer

R. Swensen 8 of 30 patients enrolled

Phase I Trial of Intraperitoneal nab-paclitaxel in the Treatment of Advanced Malignancies Primarily Confined to the Peritoneal Cavity

M. Cristea 2 of 20 patients enrolled

nab-paclitaxel in Recurrent or Persistent Cervical Cancer

D. Alberts GOG 2-stage trial

1st stage (24 pts) met RR to advance to 2nd stage

Page 25: Nab-paclitaxel Development in Gynecologic Malignancies Robert Coleman, MD, FACOG, FACS Director of Clinical Research Department of Gynecologic Oncology

Ovarian Cancer Treatment Paradigm

Where does nab-paclitaxel fit into this treatment paradigm?

SurgeryFront-line

Platinum-based regimen

Non-platinum-based regimen

1st relapsed Platinum-based

regimen

Platinum-sensitive

Platinum-resistant

Platinum-sensitive = >6 months before recurrence after front-line platinum-based chemo

#3

#1

#3

#2

Platinum-resistant = <6 months before recurrence after platinum-based chemo

• Carbo + Taxol ± Avastin

Non-platinum-based

regimens

•Carbo + Taxol ± Avastin•Carbo + Gemzar ± Avastin•Carbo + Doxil•Doxil + Trabectedin

•Doxil•Hycamtin

•Doxil•Hycamtin