mythbusters evaluation

18
KNOWLEDGE UPTAKE TRENDS: The Case of CHSRF’s Mythbusters Jonathan Sachs Selma Didic Stephen Petersen Kaye Phillips Canadian Health Services Research Foundation May 31, 2012

Upload: cfhi-fcass

Post on 01-Nov-2014

1.090 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mythbusters Evaluation

KNOWLEDGE UPTAKE TRENDS:The Case of CHSRF’s Mythbusters

Jonathan SachsSelma DidicStephen PetersenKaye Phillips

Canadian Health Services Research Foundation

May 31, 2012

Page 2: Mythbusters Evaluation

2

Background CHSRF is an independent

organization dedicated to accelerating healthcare improvement and transformation for Canadians

Mythbusters summarizes the best available evidence to challenge a widely held belief about healthcare in Canada

Page 3: Mythbusters Evaluation

3

Motivation Mythbusters as a KT Tool

CHSRF is interested in the uptake of the its knowledge products Beyond self-perception

Objective Determine the uptake of the Mythbusters series and its

role in contributing to evidence-informed decision-making in Canada

In-depth case study of a research summary

Page 4: Mythbusters Evaluation

4

Defining and Measuring ‘Uptake’Uptake

Acquisition Application Effects of Application (Policy Change)

Indicators• Mythbusters are readily accessed by key audiences

• Mythbusters are referenced by key audiences•Mythbusters are applied to inform healthcare policy and decision-making• Mythbusters are used in an educational context

• Mythbusters contribute to evidence-informed policy changes that affect health services•Mythbusters contribute to strengthened capacity in research evidence use

MethodsWebsite AnalyticsNewsletter Subscription Analysis

Citation Analysis Key Informant Interviews

Key Informant Interviews

Page 5: Mythbusters Evaluation

5

Defining and Measuring ‘Uptake’ Methods

Google Analytics & e-Newsletter Subscription Analysis

Citation analysis Peer-reviewed journals, grey literature

11 Key informant interviews Identified from 3 key audiences of Mythbusters:

Educators Applied Research & Policy Community Government Policymakers

Inclusion Criteria: Citation or Self-Identification of Use

sachsj
Online academic databases: Scopus, ProQuest, Scholar's Portal E-booksWeb search enginges: Google Scholar and Google
Page 6: Mythbusters Evaluation

6

Findings - Acquisition The Mythbusters series has evolved into one

of CHSRF’s flagship products

Web analytics 40-50,000 Unique page views annually Represents ~10% of all CHSRF web traffic

Page 7: Mythbusters Evaluation

7

Findings - Acquisition

11%

38%28%

14%

1%8%

Mythbuster 'Click-throughs' By Broad Institutitional Category

Non_Govt

Govt

Academic_Research

Delivery

Industry

Unknown

Page 8: Mythbusters Evaluation

8

Findings – Acquisition

29%

25%

17%

11%

5%

4%

3%2%

2%1%1%

Mythbuster ‘Click Throughs’ by Province

Ontario

British Columbia

Quebec

Alberta

Nova Scotia

Manitoba

Saskatchewan

New Brunswick

Newfoundland

PEI

Yukon

Page 9: Mythbusters Evaluation

9

Findings – Application Overall, Mythbusters have been cited in 239

documents since 2000.

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 19 7

23 26

17

46 44

7075

59

36

#of y

early

cita

tions

Page 10: Mythbusters Evaluation

10

Findings – Application Five Mythbusters made up 36% of all citations.

Myth: A parallel private system would reduce waiting times in the public system (46)

Myth: The aging population is to blame for uncontrollable healthcare costs (38)

Myth: User fees would stop waste and ensure better use of the healthcare system (26)

Myth: Seeing a nurse practitioner instead of a doctor is second-class care (24)

Myth: An ounce of prevention buys a pound of cure (22)

Page 11: Mythbusters Evaluation

11

Findings – Application

Journal paper/publication23%

Conference papers/an-nouncement or presentations

2%

Online/full paper 4%

Reports 24%Book/book chapter/textbook

5%

Thesis/student paper5%

Course syllabus10%

Trade literature (trade journals/online

brochures) 14%

Meeting Resolutions/Court decisions

1%

Media (Newspapers, Mag-azines, Wire Feeds)

13%

Mythbuster Citations - Source Types

Page 12: Mythbusters Evaluation

12

Findings – Application Factors that encourage ‘Application’

Summative/Short Evidence-Based Conversational/Accessible Language Framing/Style/Presentation Issue-Focused

Factors that would increase likelihood of ‘Application’ Increase confidence in Mythbusters Improve Dissemination/Communication Feedback/Communication Mechanisms for CHSRF

Page 13: Mythbusters Evaluation

13

Findings – Application

Educational Context Course curriculum

Improves understanding of contemporary health issues

Positive student reactions Capacity building

Page 14: Mythbusters Evaluation

14

Findings – Effects of ApplicationPolicy Context Mythbusters applied as a decision-support to inform

policy direction both directly and indirectly Health Canada (2010-2012)

User Fees Doctor Emigration to the USA

Nova Scotia Dept. of Health & Wellness (2010) ER Care

Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (2008) Chronic Disease

CIHI – End of Life Report (2007)

Page 15: Mythbusters Evaluation

15

Findings – Effects of Application Evidence that Mythbusters have played a role

in shifting the ‘culture of research use*’ over the last 12 years EvidenceNetwork.ca

2 Major CIHR grants Published 170 Op-Eds

Applied Researchers keep them ‘top of mind’ Speaking engagements ‘Service-oriented’ work

*Lomas, 1997

Page 16: Mythbusters Evaluation

16

Challenges of measuring policy change Complexity, Contribution

Limited to uptake of a single product

Website Statistics & Newsletter Limited sample from 2008-2012

Citation Analysis Databases

Key Informant Interviews Purposeful Sample

Limitations

Page 17: Mythbusters Evaluation

17

Implications

For CHSRF Reaffirms value of our knowledge products Allows for improvements to target key

audiences/effectivenessFor Wider Community Case study provides specific evidence of how

research ‘uptake’ can occur Findings can inform future efforts to

encourage research utilization

Page 18: Mythbusters Evaluation

18

Thank You!