muon collider/neutrino factory targetry e951 atj graphite target experiment vs. simulation

20
Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Upload: janus

Post on 28-Jan-2016

44 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation. E951Target Station Set-Up Graphite Targets. ATJ Graphite Energy Deposition – Front ATJ Rod. Temperature Profile in FRONT ATJ Graphite induced by 1.7 TP and beam spot 1.7 x 0.7 mm rms. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory TargetryE951 ATJ Graphite Target

Experiment vs. Simulation

Page 2: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

E951Target Station Set-Up Graphite Targets

Page 3: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

ATJ Graphite Energy Deposition – Front ATJ Rod

Page 4: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Temperature Profile in FRONT ATJ Graphiteinduced by 1.7 TP and beam spot 1.7 x 0.7 mm rms

Page 5: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

ATJ Graphite Strain Data

Page 6: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

ATJ Graphite Strain Data Verification of fundamental modes of target response

Record of strains in the middle of the graphite rod (left) shows a bending frequency between 380-390 Hz

The prediction of the detailed model that implements the supporting/holding fixtures of the target as close to the real setting as possible, predicts a bending frequency of 395 Hz

Also from the record, the axial “ringing” of the target has a period of 260 to 265 microseconds. The fundamental axial period T=2L/c (where L is target rod length and c is speed of sound) is approximately 261 microseconds

The radial “ringing” on the other hand, which from theory is calculated at 150 KHz (or 6.625 microsecs period), is visible only in the strain record filtered by the 500 KHz acquisition

Page 7: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

ATJ Graphite Strain Data

Page 8: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

ATJ Graphite Strain Data

Page 9: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

ATJ Graphite Strain Data

Page 10: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

ATJ Graphite Strain Data

Page 11: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

ATJ Graphite Strain Data - Predictions

Page 12: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

ATJ Graphite Strain Data - Predictions

Page 13: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data Intensity = 1.7 TP ; Beam Spot = 1.7mm x 0.7mm

Page 14: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data - PredictionsIntensity = 1.7 TP ; Beam Spot = 1.7mm x 0.7mm Rear

Page 15: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data Predictions vs. Experiment

Intensity = 1.7 TP ; Beam Spot = 1.7mm x 0.7mm

Page 16: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data - PredictionsIntensity = 3.0 TP ; Beam Spot = 2.5 x 1.0 mm

Page 17: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Rear ATJ Graphite Strain Data Prediction vs. Experiment

Page 18: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Front ATJ Graphite Strain Data Strains in the center of rod 180 deg apart/Targets offset from beam 0.2 inches

Page 19: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Carbon-Carbon Strain Data

Page 20: Muon Collider/Neutrino Factory Targetry E951 ATJ Graphite Target Experiment vs. Simulation

Rear Carbon-Carbon Strain Data