Upload File

mscr results in oklahoma

15
MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR

Upload: blithe

Post on 06-Feb-2016

31 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

Tags:

DESCRIPTION

MSCR Results in Oklahoma. Kenneth Ray Hobson, P.E August 25, 2011 SEAUPG Webinar. Summary. Data Reporting / Rounding Trends Conclusions Excel Macro Function TA Instruments. Data. ER% = ASTM D 6084, 77 o F, RTFO. Data. ER% = PG 70-28 Min. 65, PG 76-28 Min. 75. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA

KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.EAUGUST 25, 2011SEAUPG WEBINAR

Page 2: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

SUMMARY1. Data2. Reporting / Rounding3. Trends4. Conclusions5. Excel Macro Function6. TA Instruments

Page 3: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

DATA

ER% = ASTM D 6084, 77 oF, RTFO

Temp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 76-28 A1 95 98 98 0 2.48 0.01 0.02 3.3 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 92.5 94 94 0 3.94 0.03 0.03 -3.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A3 92.5 92 92 0 3.64 0.03 0.03 -3.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 3.28 0.01 0.01 -7.2 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 2.62 0.01 0.01 0.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 95 95 95 0 4.29 0.02 0.02 1.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 2.35 0.02 0.02 8.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A4 95 89 89 1 3.58 0.06 0.05 -12.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 81 81 -1 4.05 0.13 0.12 -8.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A5 87.5 74 72 3 3.9 0.20 0.21 6.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A1 95 95 95 0 2.66 0.05 0.05 -0.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 79 80 -1 4.17 0.15 0.13 -9.6 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A5 90 71 66 8 3.52 0.28 0.34 21.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 71 68 5 4.88 0.20 0.23 18.0 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A1 95 96 95 1 2.55 0.05 0.05 5.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A10 84 84 0 3 0.17 0.17 1.2 PG 64-28 E

64.0 64-22 A2 1 0 82 2.4 4.04 4.22 4.4

Page 4: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

DATA

ER% = PG 70-28 Min. 65, PG 76-28 Min. 75

Temp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 64-22 A4 8 2 80 2.10 2.39 13.6 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A1 -3 0 113 3.28 3.27 -0.3 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A2 -2 0 108 2.51 3.81 3.86 1.5 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A7 42 23 45 3.35 1.32 1.90 43.8 PG 64-22 H

64.0 64-22 A10 0 2 -366 4.58 2.14 2.23 4.3 PG 64-22 S

64.0 70-28 A3 90 64 50 21 2.47 0.54 0.78 45.0 PG 64-28 V

64.0 76-28 A3 95 86 88 -2 2.88 0.10 0.09 -12.0 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 96 97 -1 2.87 0.03 0.03 -22.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A4 97.5 85 86 -2 2.85 0.11 0.10 -10.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 95 95 95 0 3.98 0.04 0.03 -16.6 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 95 94 95 -1 2.53 0.05 0.04 -15.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 64-22 A8 -3 0 104 2.22 4.60 4.72 2.6

64.0 64-22 A9 1 1 -16 3.29 2.87 3.03 5.6 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A1 8 1 81 3.96 2.18 2.47 13.4 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A11 4 0 97 2.45 3.83 4.18 9.1

64.0 64-22 A7 45 27 40 5.36 0.83 1.18 41.8 PG 64-22 H

64.0 64-22 A2 5 0 100 2.45 3.82 4.18 9.4

Page 5: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

REPORTING / ROUNDING1. Data in Excel File Reported, Not

Rounded2. Computations Used Full ValuesAASHTO TP 70-4, 8.1.3.

Percent Recovery Data in Red:

1.0

2.31.0 100RRRRdiff

100110001

diffR 74.81

5969.0100109.05969.0

diffRVs.

Page 6: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

REPORTING / ROUNDINGPercent Recovery Data in Red:

9.1.2. PG Grade to nearest 0.1 oC?

286

1008886

diffR 949.1

21.8610089.8721.86

diffR

Shown as -1.945 by TA Instruments, -2 in spreadsheet

Page 7: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

REPORTING / ROUNDING

1.0

1.02.3 100JJJJ nrnr

nrdiff

0.003.0

10003.003.0

nrdiffJ

9.220332.0

1000332.00256.0

nrdiffJ

Page 8: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

TRENDSTemp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 76-28 A1 95 98 98 0 2.48 0.01 0.02 3.3 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 92.5 94 94 0 3.94 0.03 0.03 -3.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A3 92.5 92 92 0 3.64 0.03 0.03 -3.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 3.28 0.01 0.01 -7.2 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 2.62 0.01 0.01 0.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 95 95 95 0 4.29 0.02 0.02 1.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 98 98 0 2.35 0.02 0.02 8.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A4 95 89 89 1 3.58 0.06 0.05 -12.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A3 95 86 88 -2 2.88 0.10 0.09 -12.0 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A1 97.5 96 97 -1 2.87 0.03 0.03 -22.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A4 97.5 85 86 -2 2.85 0.11 0.10 -10.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 76-28 A7 95 94 95 -1 2.53 0.05 0.04 -15.8 PG 64-28 E

PG 76-28 = PG 64-28 E

Page 9: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

TRENDS

PG 70-28 PG 64-28 E

Temp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 81 81 -1 4.05 0.13 0.12 -8.8 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A5 87.5 74 72 3 3.9 0.20 0.21 6.1 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A1 95 95 95 0 2.66 0.05 0.05 -0.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 79 80 -1 4.17 0.15 0.13 -9.6 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A5 90 71 66 8 3.52 0.28 0.34 21.9 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A4 92.5 71 68 5 4.88 0.20 0.23 18.0 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A1 95 96 95 1 2.55 0.05 0.05 5.5 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A10 84 84 0 3 0.17 0.17 1.2 PG 64-28 E

64.0 70-28 A3 90 64 50 21 2.47 0.54 0.78 45.0 PG 64-28 V

64.0 70-28 A4 95 95 95 0 3.98 0.04 0.03 -16.6 PG 64-28 E

Page 10: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

TRENDS

PG 64-22 PG 64-22 S

Temp (C) PG Source ER % R100 R3200 R diff G*/sind RTFO Jnr0.1 Jnr3.2 Jnr diff MSCR Grade

64.0 64-22 A2 1 0 82 2.4 4.04 4.22 4.4

64.0 64-22 A4 8 2 80 2.10 2.39 13.6 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A1 -3 0 113 3.28 3.27 -0.3 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A2 -2 0 108 2.51 3.81 3.86 1.5 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A7 42 23 45 3.35 1.32 1.90 43.8 PG 64-22 H

64.0 64-22 A10 0 2 -366 4.58 2.14 2.23 4.3 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A8 -3 0 104 2.22 4.60 4.72 2.6

64.0 64-22 A9 1 1 -16 3.29 2.87 3.03 5.6 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A1 8 1 81 3.96 2.18 2.47 13.4 PG 64-22 S

64.0 64-22 A11 4 0 97 2.45 3.83 4.18 9.1

64.0 64-22 A7 45 27 40 5.36 0.83 1.18 41.8 PG 64-22 H

64.0 64-22 A2 5 0 100 2.45 3.82 4.18 9.4

Page 11: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

TRENDS1. Most PG 70-28’s and All PG 76-28’s

Grade as PG 64-28 E2. Jnr3.2 > 4.0 kPa-1 (4 of 12 PG 64-22)

• Not PG 64-22 S3. Jnr3.2 < 0.0 kPa-1 (8 of 12 PG 76-28)

Page 12: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

CONCLUSIONS1. R3.2 Limit Needed for: PG 70-28 and

PG 76-28 - (60 Min. and 80 Min.?)2. Other PG Grade Data Needed for

R3.2 Limits

3. Do Not Round Computations Except for Limit Comparisons

Page 13: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

EXCEL MACRO FUNCTIONFunction MSCRGrade(PG As String, TestTemp As Double, Jnr32 As Double, JnrDiff As Double) As String Dim iTestTemp As Double, iJnr32 As Double, iJnrDiff As Double Dim sColdTemp As String, suffix As String Application.Volatile iTestTemp = Round(TestTemp) sColdTemp = Split(PG, "-")(1) iJnr32 = WorksheetFunction.Round(Jnr32, 2) iJnrDiff = WorksheetFunction.Round(JnrDiff, 1) Select Case (True) Case iJnr32 < 0.5 And iJnrDiff <= 75: suffix = "E" Case iJnr32 <= 1 And iJnrDiff <= 75: suffix = "V" Case iJnr32 <= 2 And iJnrDiff <= 75: suffix = "H" Case iJnr32 <= 4 And iJnrDiff <= 75: suffix = "S" Case Else suffix = "NA" End Select If suffix = "NA" Then MSCRGrade = "" Else MSCRGrade = "PG " & iTestTemp & "-" & sColdTemp & " " & suffix End IfEnd Function

Page 14: MSCR Results in Oklahoma
Page 15: MSCR Results in Oklahoma

Molten Salt Central Receiver (MSCR) - ge.com · Molten Salt Central Receiver (MSCR) GE Renewable Energy Harnessing solar energy for flexible, on-demand power generation More than

2015 – 2016 Oklahoma School Testing Program (OSTP) Results

MSCR Note - MN1 - Preliminary Term Sheet

MSCR 2021-MN3 Trust Agreement

CREEP COMPLIANCE AND PERCENT RECOVERY OF OKLAHOMA … · (MSCR) test method for local conditions prevailing in Oklahoma. The study consisted of commonly used binders in Oklahoma,

OKLAHOMA BASKETBALL - Oklahoma Sooners football · OKLAHOMA BASKETBALL ... 2017-18 OKLAHOMA SCHEDULE/RESULTS N3 CENTRAL OKLAHOMA ... N25 at Oregon & 4:30 p.m. Pac12 N28 at Little

Carolyn Gould, MD MSCR Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion

2018 Oklahoma Football Oklahoma Game Results … › attachments1 › files › 31000 › 638539.pdf2018 Oklahoma Football Oklahoma Game Results (as of Jan 16, 2019) All games Date

Evaluation of Laboratory Performance in MSCR Testing (T350 ...€¦ · Evaluation of Laboratory Performance in MSCR Testing (T350/D7405) Using AMRL PSP Data JOHN J. MALUSKY, PROGRAM

Mscr 2 newer_clinical_signs_of_early_rickets

MSCR AR 2009 2.2

Implementation of the MSCR Test and Specification · PDF fileImplementation of the MSCR Test and Specification • Negative Votes (Summary of Key Points) • AASHTO T350 and ASTM D7405

Comparative Evaluation of MSCR Tests on Warm-Mix … · Comparative Evaluation of MSCR Tests on Warm-Mix ... Mixture Design Parameter Control HMA ... (°C) 45.8, 51.8, and 57.8

Oklahoma Parents as Teachers (OPAT) 2010-2011 Program Results 1

Oklahoma Joint Federal Programs Summit 2015sde.ok.gov/sde/sites/ok.gov.sde/files/documents/files/Results... · Oklahoma Joint Federal Programs Summit 2015 Results Driven Accountability

Oklahoma Cow-Calf Management Practices: Breeding Program Results from the assessment distributed with Oklahoma Beef Cattle Manuals

Initial Call ® - Confidential COWIB Workforce Oklahoma Survey Results Multiple Visits Summary Survey Results April 2014

New MScR Palaeontology and Geobiology - University of Edinburgh · 2016. 11. 11. · palaeontology were forged in the 18th and 19th centuries. Many of the best MScR projects have

Oklahoma FY 2006 Annual Report of Accomplishments and ...intranet.okstate.edu/OCES/OCES_FY06_AnnualReport.pdf · FY 2006 Annual Report of Accomplishments and Results: Oklahoma Cooperative

Mscr 2 Newer Clinical Signs Of Early Rickets

MSCR RESULTS IN OKLAHOMA KENNETH RAY HOBSON, P.E AUGUST 25, 2011 SEAUPG WEBINAR

Molten Salt Central Receiver (MSCR) - GE Renewable … Salt Central Receiver (MSCR) GE Renewable Energy Harnessing solar energy for flexible, on-demand power generation More than 100

Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR): Binder Selection

The Multiple-Stress Creep- Recovery (MSCR) Test and ......The Multiple-Stress Creep-Recovery (MSCR) Test and Specification R. Michael Anderson, Asphalt Institute ... Document . DSR

Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program

2019 Oklahoma Football Oklahoma Game Results (as of Dec 28, … · 2019 Oklahoma Football Oklahoma Overall Individual Statistics (as of Dec 28, 2019) All games Rushing gp-gs att gain

Oklahoma Wesleyan University Annual Outcomes Assessment ...okwu-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/...Report... · Oklahoma Wesleyan University Annual Outcomes Assessment Results

2011 – 2012 Oklahoma School Testing Program (OSTP) Results

OKLAHOMA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA Reports/database/FY 13...Oklahoma City metropolitan area economy has become increasingly diverse over the past decade, largely the results of efforts by business

Navigate MSCR How to Google Classroom

S43_Why the Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test Should Be Implemented_LTC2013

PANDP008D OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS …gwclawyers.com/PAROLEARCHIVE/2008/2 Parole Results...OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PAROLE DOCKET RESULTS For the Month of June

PD Dr. Werner C. Albrich, MSCR - Infekt22.2.2018 . PD Dr. Werner C. Albrich, MSCR. 16. Jahrhundert, Aztekenkunst; By Unknown - (2009) Viruses, Plagues, and History: Past, Present and

Initial Call ® - Confidential COWIB Workforce Oklahoma Survey Results – Occupational Training Summary Survey Results April 2014

Implementation of the MSCR Test and Specification · Implementation of the MSCR Test and Specification • Use and relevance of Jnr-Diff as a specification requirement 0 10 20 30