moving beyond the obvious: what is highly effective, culturally responsive pedagogy? dr. socorro...
TRANSCRIPT
Moving Beyond the Obvious: What is Highly
Effective, Culturally Responsive Pedagogy?
Dr. Socorro HerreraKansas State University
What do you see?
CIMA © 20122
Engagement, Access, & Hope
CIMA © 20123
What do you see?
The Question Persists…am I broken?
1st generation language learner in U.S. K-12 schools It’s about persistence—“being” and “behaving” like them. Am I broken?
Experience in U.S. higher education institutions Qualified Admission: Who belongs? Am I broken?
Working in U.S. prisons A sea of “students of color” who said, “My teachers hated me” and “No one
believed I could learn.” Am I broken?
Master’s in Counseling Maybe we are all pathological? Is the language of the oppressor on target? Does
poverty, culture and language difference = dysfunction? Am I broken?
Is A PhD the answer? Curriculum and Instruction? Educational Psychology
The Meaning Perspectives that teachers hold in relation to their Mexican American Students
Scapegoating, reductionist prescriptivism, mañana attitude, colorblind accommodative denial
Instead of students asking “Am I broken?,” culturally and linguistically diverse students should be pushed to ask “What are my assets?”
Instead of teachers being proleptic about their students of color’s futures, they should be asking “What are my students’ strengths?”
1971 United States Commission on Civil Rights
Report I: Ethnic Isolation of Mexican Americans in the Public Schools of the Southwest
The report concluded that:
1)Mexican American students were extremely isolated by the majority of district and school personnel.
1)Mexican Americans were underrepresented on school boards and in professional teaching positions.
1)Mexican American students were more likely to be in remedial programs.
1971 United States Commission on Civil Rights
Report II: The Unfinished Education
This report claimed that:
1)Mexican American, Black, and American Indian students do not acquire the same benefits of public education at the same rate as their white counterparts.
1)Retention of non-white students was significantly lower.
1)College acceptance and entrance rates were much lower for non-white students.
•Dropout rates increased among non-white students.
•Participation in extracurricular activities were much lower for non-white students.
1971 United States Commission on Civil Rights
Report III: The Excluded StudentThis report concluded that:
1)The Southwest school systems “have not recognized the rich culture and tradition of the Mexican American students.”
1)1/3 of schools discouraged the use of Spanish within the classroom.
1)Bilingual Education is the recommended program to meet the needs of English learners.
1)An overt omission of Mexican American history, heritage, and folklore from curriculum and textbooks caused cultural exclusion.
1)Schools only participated in “superficial and exotic elements” of Mexican American culture.
The Rise & Fall of Multicultural Education
Born out of the Civil Rights Movement, the school system moved from “multiethnic education” to “multicultural education”
Included issues of gender, socioeconomic class, and other marginalized groups
Failed to investigate and locate the deeper societal roots of racism, sexism, and classism
Left educators with an attempt to recognize cultural and linguistic diversity but never truly integrated and embedded cultural and linguistic diversity into the daily practice within our school system (Gotando, 2000).
…using the cultural characteristics,
experiences, and perspectives of ethnically
diverse students as conduits for teaching them
more effectively. It is based on the assumption
that when academic knowledge and skills are
situated within the lived experiences and
frames of reference of students, they are more
personally meaningful, have higher interest
appeal, and are learned more easily and
thoroughly. Gay (2002,
p. 106)
Culturally Responsive Teaching Is…
Critique of Culturally Responsive Teaching/Pedagogy
Sometimes educators approach culturally responsive teaching/pedagogy with a “checklist” mindset:
Read article on African American culture. CHECK! Attend professional development session on diversity.
CHECK! Cook Mexican food and bring to my students. CHECK! Watch a documentary on urban schools. CHECK! Add “diversity clothing & musical instruments” for play.
CHECK! Hang up motivational poster that includes people of color.
CHECK!
Social Justice or Social JustUS?
Teaching for social justice is currently theorized and discussed in higher education classrooms in order to prepare “teachers as change agents” by
• recognizing forms of oppression• Interrupting the cycle of oppression
BUT Social Justice can become Social JustUS when we:
• have different definitions of oppression based on our own biases.• present our views as superior to our students’ vision of a better
world.• participate in this movement merely to make ourselves feel
better.
Multiethnic Education
Civil Rights Movement
Multicultural Education
Culturally Responsive Teaching
Social Justice Teaching
What do these different educational movements have in common? Haven’t we had this conversation for over 100 years?
What were the OUTCOMES?
Efficacy Trainings, or rather “Effockus” Trainings
Laundry Lists
Us vs. Them Mentality
One-sided Dialogues
Where are we now? Why are we stuck?
Assuming A Deficit Perspective
Gorski (2008, 2010) explains that educators typically enter the classroom with adoration and “love” for their students but “hope fades” because teachers pair these good intentions with a deficit perspective.
Let’s Talk about the Deficit Perspective
Deficit perspective is the act of focusing on a student’s weaknesses rather than her/his strengths.
Complete Failure to Make It to Praxis
World of Theory
World of Reality
Praxis is the process in which theory is realized and embodied through practice.
School Situated Biography
LANGUAGEAssessment of:
Listening/SpeakingReading/Writing
ACADEMICPrior Schooling
GradesState Assessments
COGNITIVELearning Style
Learning StrategyProcessing
SOCIOCULTURALHome Visit
Interest SurveyEnvironment
Shuffling the DeckHigh Cards
Low CardsMiddle Cards
Home School
LANGUAGEComprehension L1 & L2Communication L1 & L2
Expression L1 & L2
ACADEMICAccess
EngagementHope
COGNITIVEKnowThinkApply
SOCIOCULTURALLife
LaughterLove
BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL HISTORY
While many of us might agree that relationship-building with our students is
the key their educational successes, what keeps us from building those real
relationships and connections?
Background Knowledge
Funds of Knowledge
Prior Knowledge
Academic Knowledge
Home Assets
•Traditions•Native Language•Home Literacy Practices
•Family Dynamics
Community Assets
•Language Brokering•Community Environment•Family Employment•Community Support Systems
School Assets
•Previous Content Knowledge•School Literacy Practices•School-based Cooperation & Collaboration Skills•Formal School Dynamics
Activate, Connect, Confirm
25
Access: Grouping Configurations
i + TpsI
Small GroupPerspective Taking/Consensus
Building/Peer and Teacher
Facilitated
Total Group(Teacher Directed)
Partner(Student to Student/
Teacher Facilitated)
IndividualAffirmation/Accountability
27
Three Phases of “Opportunity”
Moving Beyond the Espoused
Planned elements of teaching
Intentional efforts to build student trust and sense of belonging
Standards, curriculum, learning goals
Grouping structures and configurations
Physical aspects of the classroom
Contextual ProcessesZone Of Proximal Development
Contextual ProcessesZone Of Proximal Development
Teaching “in the moment”
Cycle of acting, observing student responses, and reacting
Attention to the interplay between students’ biographies and the lesson
Focus on supporting each learner to achieve the goals of the lesson
Situational ProcessesZone Of Proximal Development
Situational ProcessesZone Of Proximal Development
30
Language & Literacy Development
andContextualization
Joint Productive Activity and
Instructional Conversations
Challenging Activities
Opening = Activate
Working = Connect
Closing = Affirm
Don’t Judge Me!
What Matters Most
35
Where are you now? What is your plan?