monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields
DESCRIPTION
Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields. A iichi Iwazaki Nishogakusha University. High energy heavy ion collisions. Generation of color electric a nd magnetic fields according to a model of color glass condensate. High energy density o f the color gauge fields ~. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields
Aiichi IwazakiNishogakusha University
![Page 2: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
High energy heavy ion collisions
Generation of color electric and magnetic fieldsaccording to a model of color glass condensate
![Page 3: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
thermalizedquark gluon plasma
Quarks and gluons are producedby the rapid decay of the gauge fields
decay time< <1fm/c
(~ 0.5fm/c ?)Hirano, Nara2004
We have not yet foundthe rapid decay mechanismof the gauge fields.
We wish to propose a rapid decay mechanism of the gauge fields.
High energy densityof the color gauge fields
~ 2
4
gQs
![Page 4: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
width offlux tube
Homogeneous in longitudinal direction
2~)( sQgBgEfield strength
GeVGeVQs 2~1
0 BE
sQ
1 sQ
saturation momentum
Ensemble ofZ2 vortices ?E
B
B
BE
E
EB
EB
The gauge fields are unstable.
Dumitru,NaraPetreska, 2013
( RHIC or LHC )
Characteristics of the gauge fields
![Page 5: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
|A(pL=p,t)/A(pL=p,t=0|2
x
FF xtBxtBD 222' ))),(()),(((
J. Berges, S. Scheffer and D. Sexty, 2008
Exponential growth of the distancebetween nearby gauge fields at t=0
B B’ t=0
FFD
Kunihiro, Muller, Ohnishi, Schafer, Takahashi, Yamamoto (2010, 2013)
Exponential growth offluctuations aroundthe gauge fields
![Page 6: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Exponential growth oflongitudinal pressure offluctuations aroundthe gauge fields in expandingglasma (τ,η coordinates )
Romatschke and Venugopalan 2006
Fukushima and Gelis 2011
It has been found thatthese instabilities do notlead to sufficiently rapid decayof the gauge fields for QGP to berealized within 1fm/c.They have been discussed tobe Nielsen-Olesen instabilities.
![Page 7: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Nielsen-Olesen instability
classical instability in SU(2) gauge theory
22
22241
)(4
)(
||21)(
41
gAAig
DDAAFLgluon
3 AA
2
21
iAA
( Electromagnetic fieldsrepresent the backgroundgauge fields )
3,2,1,)(||21|| 22
jiAAigDDL jiijjiijjiit
The term can be positive or negativefor arbitrary magnetic field B0
,
00 AgaugeigAD iii
Iwazaki 2008, Itakura, Fujii, 2008
( charged vector fieldsare fluctuations aroundthe gauge fields )
Nielsen and Olesen 1978,
![Page 8: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Homogeneous B )0,0,0( 1221321 AABBB
gBDL t 2|||| 22
221
i
negative potential
0),exp( 22 sQgBti
Nielsen-Olesen unstable modesoccupying lowest Landau level
Negative potentialfor homogeneous B -2gB
Potential forinhomogeneous B
)(~;0),exp( 22seffeff QOgBgBgBti
growth rate
sQgB
growth rate
effgB
gBD 222
02
),exp( t
gB2Bound states in the Lowest Landau level
Bound states exist with
We may represent these bound states by using effective magnetic field
Eq. of motion
![Page 9: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Numerical results ( nonexpanding glasma )
sQgtA )25.0~17.0())(3.0~2.0();exp( 4/12
growth rate
saturationmomentum
cfmQ s
/2.117.011
A roughly estimated decay timeof the background fields
5.221
4
12
gg
GeVQ
s
s
J. Berges, S. Scheffer and D. Sexty, 2008Kunihiro, Muller, Ohnishi, Schafer, Takahashi, Yamamoto (2010, 2013)
When we represent the growth rate by using effective homogeneous magnetic field such as ,we find
effgB
effgB2)17.0( seff QgB
![Page 10: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
effteff gBDL 2|||| 22
222 06.0)17.0(22 sseffeff QQgBm
small effective mass( imaginary )
Effective Lagrangian of describing the instabilityunder inhomogeneous magnetic fields is given such that using effective homogeneous magnetic field
seff QgB 17.0~
effgB
small growth rate
)exp( t
long decay time cfm /2.1~1
![Page 11: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Using the effective Lagrangian, we calculate the back reaction of the unstable modes on the background gauge fields and show how fast the fields decay.
We show that the monopole production leads to much morerapid decay of the gauge fields than the production of Nielsen-Olesen unstable modes
Similarly, we wish to calculate the back reaction of magnetic monopoles on the background gauge fields by using an effective Lagrangian of the monopoles.
The monopoles are such objects whose condensation gives rise to “quark confinement” in QCD.
![Page 12: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
dimi
di
mmmd
mtmonopole
AigD
mDL
42222 ||||||||
Effective Lagrangian of magnetic monopolesdescribing quark confinement
m
di
m
A
gg
GeVOm
2)1(
larger than
magnetic charge
dual gauge fields
GeVQforGeVQfor
gg
g
s
s
sm
2315.2
212
‘tHooftMandelstam1976
Koma, Suzuki 2003
GeVmeff 25.0~
describes dual superconductors
GeVQs 1for
monopole field
monopoleL
![Page 13: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
We calculate the decay time of background colorelectric ( magnetic ) fields by using the effective Lagrangian of Niesen-Olesen unstable modes ( magnetic monopoles ) in expanding glasma(τ,η coordinates )
Note thatthe monopoles occupy Landau levels underbackground electric field, while Nielsen-Olesen modes occupy Landau levels under magnetic field.
![Page 14: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Our assumptions
Relevant monopoles occupy only the lowest Landau level
Their distribution is almost homogeneous in transverse plain so that magnetic field affected bythe monopole production is almost homogeneous.
The similar assumptions for Nielsen-Olesenunstable modes are adopted.
![Page 15: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
)||1|(| 22
244 effteff gBDdxLdxg
igAD
)|),(||),(|1|),((| 222
224
effeff gBDddLLdxg
2
0
22
0
|)(|;)(),(
n
TnnTn
Tnn xadxLxa
)4
||()(
2
21Teffn
n
xgBExpixx
Effective Lagrangian of Nilesen-Olesen (N-O) unstable modes in τ,ηcoordinates
)log(21,
30
3023
20 xx
xxxx
Assuming homogeneousdistribution of N-O modesin transverse plain, the dynamicalvariable is left.
2
0
|)(|n
Tnn xa
),(
( wave functions ofthe lowest Landau level )
![Page 16: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
)||||||1|(| 22222
244mmeffmm
dmeff mEgDdxLdxg
dm
d AigD
)|),(||),(||),(|1|),((| 22222
22
mmeffmmm mEgDddL 2
0,
22
0, |)(|;)(),(
n
TnmnTn
Tnmnmm xadxLxa
)4
||()(
2
21,Teffmn
nm
xEgExpixx
wave functions ofthe lowest Landau level under
Effective Lagrangian of magnetic monopoles in the lowest Landau level
effmEg
d
m
effmeff
AA
mm
EggB
00
Nielsen-Olesen monopole
![Page 17: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Equations of motion of Nielsen-Olesen modes
222
22
0
2
|),(|))((2
2)()1(
),())((1
1),()1(
gAdggA
gAgBeff
);(),,(2
),(
gAed i homogeneous in Txand
0
1)(
effgBgB We assume that
background magnetic field decreaseswith the expansion
The equations describe how the electric fielddecays via the production of Nielsen-Olesen unstable modes
)(1 AE
Maxwell eq.
![Page 18: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
initial conditionsWe use the initial conditions given by Dusling, Gelis, and Venugopalan
jiijiij
j
ii
i
ii
CzWeCzWegE
i
atccCzWgEeed
realedi
,2/,2/)1(4/)1(
,2/,2/)1(4/)1(
202,1
1
,,20
4/)1(
21
)()(1),(
0..)(22
),(
),,(2
2/)(),(
2/,2/)1(,2/
),(20
,
iiigEz
zW
Whittaker function 0
)(
,,,,
,,,
jiji
jiji
CCCC
CC
2/122/,2/)1(
2/)1(22/,2/)1(
2/)1(
20|)(||)(|1),( zWezWe
gEiiii
τ→0
Without taking average of initial values after obtaining the time evolution of we take the initial value,
CC )0,( ),(
τ→0
2011, 2012
That is, we include next toleading order of quantumeffects on the evolutionof the background gaugefields.
![Page 19: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
2/,2/)1(,2/
),(1),(
20
,20
iiigEz
zWgE
),()2/)0((1
),())((1
1),()1(
222
22
0
2
gEgB
gAgB
eff
eff
Positive energy solutions of the equation with the parameters, )0(0 gEgEgBeff
asτ→0
Whittaker function
![Page 20: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
2/122/,2/)1(
2/)1(22/,2/)1(
2/)1(
20|)(||)(|1),( zWezWe
gEiiii
τ→0
This initial condition comes from the average,
jiijiij
j CzWeCzWegE
i ,2/,2/)1(4/)1(
,2/,2/)1(4/)1(
202,1
1 )()(1),(
2,1,,
22/,2/)1(
2/)1(
2,1,,
22/,2/)1(
2/)1(
20 |)(|
|)(|1),(),(
jjjii
jjjii
CCzWe
CCzWe
gE
with the use of the formulae,τ→0
τ→0
2/20igEz
For simplicity, we take the simple initial conditions,
Similar procedures of initial conditions even in the case of the magnetic monopoles are assumed.
![Page 21: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
)0()(
BgBg
m
m
)0()(
gEgE
Decay of the electric fieldproducing Nielsen-Olesen modes
fm/c
fm/c
Decay of the magnetic fieldproducing magnetic monopoles
ten times more rapid decay
We should note howthe gauge field rapidlydecays producingthe magnetic monopoles.
GeVQGeVmGeV
gEgB
ss 2,3/17.0,34.0~
)0()0(
tentative results
0.1fm/c
1 fm/c
![Page 22: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
|)01.0,(| 0 gEInitial amplitude of Nielsen-Olesen unstable modes
|)01.0,(| effmm BgInitial amplitude of magnetic monopoles
The initial amplitude is 10 times larger than theamplitude of Nielsen-Olesen unstable modes
2/1
22/,2/)1(
2/)1(
22/,2/)1(
2/)1(
20 |)(|
|)(|1
zWe
zWe
gE ii
ii
2/1
22/,2/)2.31(
2/)2.31(
22/,2/)2.31(
2/)2.31(
2 |)(|
|)(|1
zWe
zWe
Bg ii
ii
effm
![Page 23: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Pair creations of magnetic monopoles under magnetic fields by Schwinger mechnism
production rate of monopoles
312101.3~)
)(exp( 2
2
sseffm
effm andGeVQforBgEgm
103.2~)exp( eff
eff
gEgB
2)34.0( GeVgBgE effeff
GeVm 7.0
Tanji and Itakura, 2012
The production rate of the monopolesis about 10 times larger than thatof Nielsen-Olesen unstable modes.
Compare the production rate of the monopoles with that of Nielsen-Olesen unstable modes
production rate of N-O modes
![Page 24: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
conclusionsWe have shown that the gauge fields generated afterhigh energy heavy ion collisions decay much more rapidlyproducing magnetic monopoles than Nielsen-Olesenunstable modes.
Although our calculation does not properly take into account precise initial conditions so that the result ispreliminary, it shows that the role of the magnetic monopoles in the realization of thermalized QGP is important.
![Page 25: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
time
J. Berges, S. Scheffer and D. Sexty, 2008
Numerical simulations
2|)0,(/),(| tptp LL exponential growth ofthe fluctuations
![Page 27: Monopole production and rapid decay of gauge fields](https://reader036.vdocuments.mx/reader036/viewer/2022062310/56816461550346895dd63e36/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Kunihiro, Muller, Ohnishi, Schafer, Takahashi, Yamamoto (2010, 2013)
Exponential growth of the distancebetween nearby gauge fields
x
FF xtBxtBD 222' ))),(()),(((
B B’ t=0
t
FFD
Numerical simulations
gBDxtB 2||)),(( 22
( in our notations )