monitoring the busan partnership agreement global partnership for effective development...

6
Monitoring the Busan Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co- operation. 1

Upload: jessica-wheeler

Post on 28-Dec-2015

229 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monitoring the Busan Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1

1

Monitoring the Busan Partnership agreement

Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation.

Page 2: Monitoring the Busan Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1

2

Busan Partnership agreement• Participants: receivers & providers, South-South co-operation partners,

multilateral organisations, regional organisations, and representatives from civil society, parliamentary organisations, the private sector and local government.

• To date, over 160 countries and 45 organisations from around the world have endorsed the Busan agreement. All members of the Development Partners Group have endorsed the Busan Partnership agreement in addition to other development actors in Tanzania such as: GAVI, GFATM Abu Dhabi Fund, ABEDA, GEF, OPEC Fund, Saudi Fund, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation etc.

• Co-Chairs: Ms. Armida Alisjahbana, Minister of State for National Development Planning, INDONESIA; Ms. Justine Greening, Secretary of State for International Development, UNITED KINGDOM; Ms. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, Minister of Finance, NIGERIA.

Page 3: Monitoring the Busan Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1

3

INDICATORSCOUNTRY LEVEL OTHER PROCESSES

1 Development co-operation is focused on results that meet developing countries’ prioritiesPilot monitoring – not by Tanzania.

2 Civil society operates within an environment that maximizes its engagement in and contribution to development Measured by CIVICUS Enabling Environment Index

3 Engagement and contribution of the private sector to development Desk review in collaboration with the World Bank Institute

4 Transparency: information on development co-operation is publicly available Desk review building on data sources of the common, open standard and conducted in collaboration with the IATI and OECD-DAC- Secretariats

5a+b Development co-operation is more predictable (annual and medium-term) 5 A – DP data from AMP5 B – GoT data from AMP

6 Aid is on budgets which are subject to parliamentary scrutiny GoT and DP data from AMP

7 Mutual accountability strengthened through inclusive reviews.GoT questionnaire

SameAlso measured globally through UNDESA work on Mutual Accountability

8 Gender equality and women’s empowerment Measured by UNWomen

SameAlso measured globally by UN Women

9a Quality of developing country PFM systems CPIA Desk review

9b Use of developing country PFM and procurement systems DP data from AMP and DP submissions

10 Aid is untied Collected by OECD-DAC

Page 4: Monitoring the Busan Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1

4

Data needed

From DPs1. MTEF Commitments

2012/13 (AMP)2. Disbursements (Tz and

GoT) 2012/13 (AMP)3. Aid to other providers

(DPs)4. Aid through systems

(execution, reporting, audit, procurement) (DPs)

From MoF• MTEF 2013/14-15/16

projections (AMP)• Aid on budget 2012/13

(MoF/Budget Book)• Mutual Accountability

(qualitative info – MOF)• Gender equality (qualitative

info – MoF/UNWOMEN)

Page 5: Monitoring the Busan Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1

5

Timeframe

• Aug 13: Circulation of DP data from AMP• Aug 20: Q&A session for DPs• Aug 26: DPs submit to DPG Secr.• Aug 27: DPG Secr. submit to MoF• Sept 13: Validation meeting• Oct 31: Global deadline for submission

Page 6: Monitoring the Busan Partnership agreement Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation. 1

6

Validation

• DPs appoint focal point• Data discrepancies addressed with DPG

Secretariat and MoF• JAST WG DPs (Canada, Ireland, WB, EU, UN) +

interested?