N

ARABIAN SEA

Cities under National Air Quality

Monitoring Programme (NAMP)

Lucknow

Vishakhapatnam

CHATTISGARH

Gulbarga

Mysore

Bangalore

KERALA

Palakkad

Thiruvananthapuram

Kottayam

Kozhikode

Kochi

Kolhapur

Pune

Vasco GOA Panjim

Lote

Hassan

Mangalore

KARNATAKA

Dharwad Belgaum

Hubli

Solapur

Solem Coimbatore

Madurai

TAMIL NADU

Tirupati

Hyderabad

Chennai

Pondicherry

ANDHRA PRADESH

Kurnool

Vijayavada

GUJARAT

Rajkot Jamnagar

Parwanoo Shimla Jalandhar

Nagda

Naya Nangal

Hissar

Yamuna Nagar

Chandigarh

Aurangabad

Alwar

DELHI Fridabad

HARYANA

MAHARASHTRA

PUNJAB

Ankaleshwar

DADAR NAGAR HAVELI

Vadodara

Mumbai

Surat

Diu Daman

Tarapur

Silwasa

Thane

Vapi Nasik

Ujjain

Udaipur

Indore

RAJASTHAN

Jodhpur Jaipur

Kota

Ludhiana

Chandrapur

Nagpur

MADHYA PRADESH I N D I A

Bhopal

Bhilai

Jabalpur

Firozabad

Ghaziabad

Paonta Sahib Kala Amb

Dehradun

UTTARANCHAL

UTTAR PRADESH Noida

Gwalior

Agra

Gajraula

Khanna

Kanpur

Jammu

JAMMU & KASHMIR

HIMACHAL PRADESH Damtal

BAY OF BENGAL

MANIPUR

MIZORAM WEST BENGAL

Asansol

Howrah Haldia

Kolkata

Gangtok

Behrampur

Angul

Sambalpur

Raurkela

Jamshedpur

Bhubaneshwar ORISSA

JHARKHAND

Ranchi

Rayagada

Raipur

Anpara

Bilaspur

Talcher Cuttack

Dhanbad

Jharia

BIHAR Patna

Durgapur TRIPURA

Guwahati

SIKKIM

MEGHALYA Shillong

ASSAM

ARUNACHAL PRADESH

NAGALAND

Dimapur

Ahmadabad

Tuticorin

Mormugao

Aizwal Sagar

Satna

Bongiagaon

Sindri Singrauli

Varanasi

Baddi

Ambarnath

Legend • - Cities under NAMP (Not to scale)

Navi Mumbai

Meerut Khurja

Jhansi

Ramagundum Patencheru

Different monitoring modes & facility under NAMP

Ambient Air Quality trend in four mega cities-India

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

SO2 NO2 PM10 SO2 NO2 PM10 SO2 NO2 PM10 SO2 NO2 PM10

Delhi Mumbai Kolkata Chennai

Co

nce

ntr

ati

on

in

µg

/m3

Cities & parameters

Air quality trends in Four Mega Cities of India

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

NAAQS: SO2-50µg/m3

NO2-40µg/m3 PM10-60µg/m3

Air quality trend in mega cities

Trends in Annual Average Concentration in Four Mega Cities

Locations / stations with low, moderate, high and critical pollution levels

Major findings during 2010

98

9

0

4

10 0

1616

12

0

0

5

10

15

20

SO2 NO2 PM10Parameter

Num

ber

of lo

cations

Low Moderat e High Crit ical

Percentage of locations in residential/industrial/commercial/rural and ecologically sensitive ares with low, moderate, high & critical

pollution level 2010

Percentage of locations in residential/industrial/commercial/rural and ecologically

sensitive ares with low, moderate, high & critical pollution level

50

04

40

17

3633 35

0.3

10

29

0

17

40

8

53

0 0

62

96

42

1

64

0

20

40

60

80

100

SO2 NO2 PM10 SO2 NO2 PM10

Parameter

Pe

rce

nta

ge

of lo

ca

tio

ns

Low Moderate High Critical

----Residential/Industrial/Rural/Others---- --------Ecologically sensitive area------

Cities with low,

moderate, high and

critical pollution

levels 2010

Number of cities w ith low, moderate, high & critical pollution level (residential

/ industrial / rural / other area)

10

63

34

110

47

09

83

153

83

2

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

SO2 NO2 PM10Parameter

Num

ber

of citi

es

LowModerateHighCritical

Pollution level Annual Mean Concentration Range (µg/m3) Industrial, Residential, Rural & other areas

SO2 NO2 PM10

Low (L) 0-25 0-20 0-30

Moderate (M) 26-50 21-40 31-60

High (H) 51-75 41-60 61-90

Critical (C) >75 >60 >90

Percentage of cities showing low,

moderate, high and critical level of

SO2

01

93

6

Percentage of cities showing low,

moderate, high and critical level of NO2

5

50

38

6

Low

Moderate

High

Critical

Percentage of cities showing low,

moderate, high and critical level PM10

50

1

21

28

Pollution level Annual Mean Concentration Range (µg/m3) Industrial, Residential, Rural & other areas

SO2 NO2 RSPM

Low (L) 0-25 0-20 0-30

Moderate (M) 26-50 21-40 31-60

High (H) 51-75 41-60 61-90

Critical (C) >75 >60 >90

Percentage of cities showing low,

moderate, high and critical level of

SO2, NO2 and PM10 (residential /

industrial / rural / other area)

Annual average concentration of pollutants in different States and Union territories 2010

SO2

7

5

2

11

7 7

5

1415

14

3

5

23

10

4

11

17

2 2 2

5

11

67

9

12

10

5

0

5

10

15

20

25

SO2States

Con

cent

ratio

n in

mic

rogr

am p

er c

ubic

met

er

NO2

15

26

16

22

18 18

55

18

23 23

1513

39

22

13

17

31

10

6 6

18

27

13

29

20

30

64

17

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

NO2

States

Con

cent

ratio

n in

mic

rogr

am p

er c

ubic

met

er

PM10

76

118

92

107

39 35

68

89

171

88

105

70

42

137

101 101

42

68

86

38

70

181169

110

73

261

193 187

168

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

280

PM10

States

Co

nc

en

tra

tio

n i

n m

icro

gra

m p

er c

ub

ic m

ete

r

Andhra Pradesh Assam

Bihar Chandigarh

Chat t isgarh Dadra & Nagar Haveli

Daman & Diu Delhi

Goa Gujarat

Haryana Himachal Pradesh

Jammu & Kashmir Jharkhand

Karnat aka Kerala

Madhya Pradesh Maharasht ra

Meghalaya Mizoram

Nagaland Orissa

Punjab Puducherry

Rajast han Tamilnadu

Ut t ar Pradesh Ut t arakhand

West Bengal

Yearly Trends of Low, Moderate, High and Critical levels of SO2,

NO2 and PM10 (Residential areas; percentage of location)

Nitrogen dioxide

6 2 6 570

6 56 0 6 4

6 9 70

4 2 4 2

3 02 9

2 52 8 3 7

3 4 2 7 2 7

4 84 0

6 5 5 82 4 3

7

10

381

2 1

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Year

% o

f lo

cati

on

Low Moderate High Critical

Yearly Trends of Low, Moderate, High and Critical levels of SO2, NO2 and PM10 (Residential areas; percentage of location)

PM10

2 2 2 1 1 2 1 0 1

1210

17 17 18 19 1817 17 17

24 24

28

22 22

26 27 33 3429

64 63

53

6058

54 5350 49

53

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

% o

f lo

ca

tio

n

Low Moderate High Critical

National mean concentration of different locations that fall under 10th and 90th percentile for SO2, NO2 and PM10

0

10

20

30

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Year

Concentr

ation (

µg/m

3)

90% of Sites have concentrations below this line

10% of Sites have concentrations below this line

Average

SO2

a.

SO2: within NAAQS at almost all cities

decreasing trend (reduction of sulphur in diesel

National mean concentration of different locations that fall under 10th and 90th percentile for SO2, NO2 and PM10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Year

Co

nce

ntr

atio

n (

µg

/m3)

90% of Sites have concentrations below this line

10% of Sites have concentrations below this line

Average

NO2

b.

NO2: within NAAQS in most cities

National mean concentration of different locations that fall under 10th and 90th percentile for SO2, NO2 and PM10

0

50

100

150

200

250

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Year

Concentr

ation (

µg/m

3) 90% of Sites have concentrations below this line

10% of Sites have concentrations below this line

Average

PM10

c.

PM10 exceed NAAQS in many cities (increase in number of vehicles, industrial

emissions, natural dust and re-suspension of dust.

EDB

LIMITATIONS IN EDB

DATA

VALIDATION

GAPS IN UPDATION

DATA QUALITY & OUTLIERS

N

Y

N

Y

PAYMENT COMPILATION & ANALYSIS

SP

SB

, P

CC

, N

EE

RI

PA

MS

-CP

CB

SPCB, PCC, NEERI

SPCB, PCC, NEERI

to update query

manual