monitoring impacts of ground-based thinning on soil quality in a late seral reserve
DESCRIPTION
Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve. D.H. Young PSW Research Station R.F. Powers PSW Research Station B.L. Rust Shasta Trinity National Forest. Shasta-Trinity National Forest Eastern Klamath Geology 3000 ft. Elev. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a
Late Seral Reserve
D.H. Young PSW Research StationR.F. Powers PSW Research StationB.L. Rust Shasta Trinity National Forest
![Page 2: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Iron CanyonArea
Shasta-Trinity National Forest
Eastern KlamathGeology
3000 ft. Elev.
70-80 in. MAP
![Page 3: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Boomer seriesUltic Haploxeralf
loam/clay loam
18” A horizon
Db ~ 0.76
Site Index 25 m (50 yr)
![Page 4: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
IRON CANYON LATE SERAL RESERVE
Mixed Conifer-Black Oak/Dogwood70-80 Years, Even-agedBasal area 100-180 ft2/acreOverstocked and Fuel Loaded2800-3000’ elevation / 70-80” MAP
![Page 5: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
LSR THINNING PRESCRIPTION
• Thin from below (May 2001)
• Retain 50-60 % crown cover • Retain older, mature trees
• Favor ponderosa pine for eagle nests
• Remove 80% of fuel ladder• Mechanical harvest -
Timbco feller buncherrubber tired grapple skidder
![Page 6: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
![Page 7: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
![Page 8: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Are these impacts
important??
HarvestedIn May
![Page 9: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Disturbance -101• EXTENT
% area, depth
• SEVERITYundisturbed extreme
![Page 10: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Disturbance -101• EXTENT
% area, depth
• SEVERITYundisturbed extreme
• DISTRIBUTIONdispersed concentrated
• DURATIONshort term long term
mitigation? natural
recovery?
![Page 11: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Harvest Equipment x
Timing of Operations x
Fine Textured Soils =
SOILS CONCERN
![Page 12: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Harvest Equipment x
Timing of Operations x
Fine Textured Soils =
SOILS CONCERN
Did we meet the soil standards??
![Page 13: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
National Forest Soil Scientists are Charged with Monitoring Management Impacts
Did we meet the soil standards??How do we go about monitoring??
![Page 14: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
National Forest Soil Scientists are Charged with Monitoring
There are not clear protocols.This is a problem.
![Page 15: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Basic Monitoring Approach
1. STRATIFY THE AREA (extent)Disturbance Classes
2. ASSESS EACH CLASS (severity)Bulk Density, Penetrometer
3. ASSESS SAMPLING EFFECTIVENESSStatistical Significance of Estimates
4. ASSESS THE IMPORTANCERegional Standards = ? = Ecological Impacts
![Page 16: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
National Forest Soil Scientists are Charged with Monitoring
There are not clear protocols.This is a problem.
LUMPER
SPLITTER
![Page 17: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Extent
Disturbance Classes• LOW
forest floor completely intact, no sign of traffic
• MODERATEforest floor disturbed, but not a skid trail
• HIGHobvious skid trails
![Page 18: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Light
Moderate
Heavy
100 ft Transect
WE AGREED UPON DISTURBANCE CATEGORIESAND LAID OUT 100-FT TRANSECTS
![Page 19: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
![Page 20: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Unit Proportion by Disturbance ClassIron Canyon Harvest Unit 5/6/02
high34%
low34%
moderate32%
Disturbances were partitioned about equally
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Extent
![Page 21: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Soil pit in “High disturbance” fine roots through A/AB to Btplaty structure thru A horizons
A horizons
Bt horizons
Soil pit in “Low disturbance”forest floor intact, little compaction in A horizon
QUALITATIVE
![Page 22: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity
QUANTITATIVE
![Page 23: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Disturbance Category: Low Mod High units
bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity
Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)
![Page 24: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Disturbance Category: Low Mod High units
bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity
Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)
Region 5 Standard: 10% Porosity Reduction
Initial Db: 0.89
Threshold Db: 1.06
![Page 25: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
RECORDING PENETROMETER
Many times faster than bulk density
Simulates what roots experience
Measures strength at 15 mm intervals to 60 cm depth
Electronic files
![Page 26: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Strength Profiles by Disturbance ClassMay 2002
0
100
200
300
400
5000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
SOIL STRENGTH (kPa)
DEP
TH (m
m)
lowmoderatehigh
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity
![Page 27: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Strength Profiles by Disturbance ClassMay 2002
0
100
200
300
400
5000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
SOIL STRENGTH (kPa)
DEP
TH (m
m)
lowmoderatehigh
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity
![Page 28: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Disturbance Category: Low Mod High units
bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3
soil strength 1085 1348 1801 kPa
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity
Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)
![Page 29: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Disturbance Category: Low Mod High units
bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3
soil strength 1085 1348 1801 kPa
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity
Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)
No Regional Standard.
Root activity inhibited: >2000
Root activity ceases: >3000
![Page 30: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Disturbance Category: low mod high units
bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3
soil strength 1085 1348 1801 kPa
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity
Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)
Monitoring indicates the thinning operation was conducted in compliance with R5 soil standards
![Page 31: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Disturbance Category: low mod high units
bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3
soil strength 1085 1348 1801 kPa
Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity
Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)
Monitoring indicates the thinning operation was conducted in compliance with R5 soil standards
Although.... We lacked a true undisturbed area to use for baseline comparison.
![Page 32: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
What’s the site condition before entry?
Was it truly “pristine”?Or did it come with “baggage”?
Does legacy disturbance matter? Or, is “natural recovery” adequate to mitigate old disturbance?
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
![Page 33: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
What’s the site condition before entry?
Was it truly “pristine”?Or did it come with “baggage”?
Does legacy disturbance matter? Or, is “natural recovery” adequate to mitigate old disturbance?
Are there cumulative effects?
IMPORTANT QUESTIONS
![Page 34: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Site 1
Site 2
Iron Canyon
Watershed
Site 12001 Harvest
Site 22003 Harvest
![Page 35: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Pre-harvestStand
Conditions
Overstockedand
Fuel Loaded
![Page 36: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
40 YEAR DISTURBANCE
LEGACY
1960’s EraSkid Trails
![Page 37: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
40 YEAR DISTURBANCE
LEGACY
1960’s EraSkid Trails
Dedicated for permanent traffic
system??
![Page 38: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Pre Harvest (Residual) DisturbanceUnit Proportion by Disturbance Class
undist67%
dist22%
skid11%
Iron Canyon II Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Extent
![Page 39: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Disturbance Category: undist dist skid units
Bulk density 0.76 0.79 0.90 g/cm3
Iron Canyon II Soil MonitoringPre-Harvest Residual Disturbance
Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)
Region 5 Standard: 10% Porosity Reduction
Initial Db: 0.76
Threshold Db: 0.95
![Page 40: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062305/56813e18550346895da7fba6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Disturbance Category: undist dist skid units
Bulk density 0.76 0.79 0.90 g/cm3
Strength(10 month average)
984 1534 2314 kPa
Iron Canyon II Soil MonitoringPre-Harvest Residual Disturbance
Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)