monitoring impacts of ground-based thinning on soil quality in a late seral reserve

40
Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve D.H. Young PSW Research Station R.F. Powers PSW Research Station B.L. Rust Shasta Trinity National Forest

Upload: tucker

Post on 16-Mar-2016

60 views

Category:

Documents


14 download

DESCRIPTION

Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a Late Seral Reserve. D.H. Young PSW Research Station R.F. Powers PSW Research Station B.L. Rust Shasta Trinity National Forest. Shasta-Trinity National Forest Eastern Klamath Geology 3000 ft. Elev. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a

Late Seral Reserve

D.H. Young PSW Research StationR.F. Powers PSW Research StationB.L. Rust Shasta Trinity National Forest

Page 2: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Iron CanyonArea

Shasta-Trinity National Forest

Eastern KlamathGeology

3000 ft. Elev.

70-80 in. MAP

Page 3: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Boomer seriesUltic Haploxeralf

loam/clay loam

18” A horizon

Db ~ 0.76

Site Index 25 m (50 yr)

Page 4: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

IRON CANYON LATE SERAL RESERVE

Mixed Conifer-Black Oak/Dogwood70-80 Years, Even-agedBasal area 100-180 ft2/acreOverstocked and Fuel Loaded2800-3000’ elevation / 70-80” MAP

Page 5: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

LSR THINNING PRESCRIPTION

• Thin from below (May 2001)

• Retain 50-60 % crown cover • Retain older, mature trees

• Favor ponderosa pine for eagle nests

• Remove 80% of fuel ladder• Mechanical harvest -

Timbco feller buncherrubber tired grapple skidder

Page 6: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve
Page 7: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve
Page 8: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Are these impacts

important??

HarvestedIn May

Page 9: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance -101• EXTENT

% area, depth

• SEVERITYundisturbed extreme

Page 10: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance -101• EXTENT

% area, depth

• SEVERITYundisturbed extreme

• DISTRIBUTIONdispersed concentrated

• DURATIONshort term long term

mitigation? natural

recovery?

Page 11: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Harvest Equipment x

Timing of Operations x

Fine Textured Soils =

SOILS CONCERN

Page 12: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Harvest Equipment x

Timing of Operations x

Fine Textured Soils =

SOILS CONCERN

Did we meet the soil standards??

Page 13: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

National Forest Soil Scientists are Charged with Monitoring Management Impacts

Did we meet the soil standards??How do we go about monitoring??

Page 14: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

National Forest Soil Scientists are Charged with Monitoring

There are not clear protocols.This is a problem.

Page 15: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Basic Monitoring Approach

1. STRATIFY THE AREA (extent)Disturbance Classes

2. ASSESS EACH CLASS (severity)Bulk Density, Penetrometer

3. ASSESS SAMPLING EFFECTIVENESSStatistical Significance of Estimates

4. ASSESS THE IMPORTANCERegional Standards = ? = Ecological Impacts

Page 16: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

National Forest Soil Scientists are Charged with Monitoring

There are not clear protocols.This is a problem.

LUMPER

SPLITTER

Page 17: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Extent

Disturbance Classes• LOW

forest floor completely intact, no sign of traffic

• MODERATEforest floor disturbed, but not a skid trail

• HIGHobvious skid trails

Page 18: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Light

Moderate

Heavy

100 ft Transect

WE AGREED UPON DISTURBANCE CATEGORIESAND LAID OUT 100-FT TRANSECTS

Page 19: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve
Page 20: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Unit Proportion by Disturbance ClassIron Canyon Harvest Unit 5/6/02

high34%

low34%

moderate32%

Disturbances were partitioned about equally

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Extent

Page 21: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Soil pit in “High disturbance” fine roots through A/AB to Btplaty structure thru A horizons

A horizons

Bt horizons

Soil pit in “Low disturbance”forest floor intact, little compaction in A horizon

QUALITATIVE

Page 22: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity

QUANTITATIVE

Page 23: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance Category: Low Mod High units

bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity

Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)

Page 24: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance Category: Low Mod High units

bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity

Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)

Region 5 Standard: 10% Porosity Reduction

Initial Db: 0.89

Threshold Db: 1.06

Page 25: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

RECORDING PENETROMETER

Many times faster than bulk density

Simulates what roots experience

Measures strength at 15 mm intervals to 60 cm depth

Electronic files

Page 26: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Strength Profiles by Disturbance ClassMay 2002

0

100

200

300

400

5000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

SOIL STRENGTH (kPa)

DEP

TH (m

m)

lowmoderatehigh

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity

Page 27: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Strength Profiles by Disturbance ClassMay 2002

0

100

200

300

400

5000 500 1000 1500 2000 2500

SOIL STRENGTH (kPa)

DEP

TH (m

m)

lowmoderatehigh

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity

Page 28: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance Category: Low Mod High units

bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3

soil strength 1085 1348 1801 kPa

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity

Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)

Page 29: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance Category: Low Mod High units

bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3

soil strength 1085 1348 1801 kPa

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity

Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)

No Regional Standard.

Root activity inhibited: >2000

Root activity ceases: >3000

Page 30: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance Category: low mod high units

bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3

soil strength 1085 1348 1801 kPa

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity

Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)

Monitoring indicates the thinning operation was conducted in compliance with R5 soil standards

Page 31: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance Category: low mod high units

bulk density 0.89 0.94 1.01 g/cm3

soil strength 1085 1348 1801 kPa

Iron Canyon Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Severity

Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)

Monitoring indicates the thinning operation was conducted in compliance with R5 soil standards

Although.... We lacked a true undisturbed area to use for baseline comparison.

Page 32: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

What’s the site condition before entry?

Was it truly “pristine”?Or did it come with “baggage”?

Does legacy disturbance matter? Or, is “natural recovery” adequate to mitigate old disturbance?

IMPORTANT QUESTIONS

Page 33: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

What’s the site condition before entry?

Was it truly “pristine”?Or did it come with “baggage”?

Does legacy disturbance matter? Or, is “natural recovery” adequate to mitigate old disturbance?

Are there cumulative effects?

IMPORTANT QUESTIONS

Page 34: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Site 1

Site 2

Iron Canyon

Watershed

Site 12001 Harvest

Site 22003 Harvest

Page 35: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Pre-harvestStand

Conditions

Overstockedand

Fuel Loaded

Page 36: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

40 YEAR DISTURBANCE

LEGACY

1960’s EraSkid Trails

Page 37: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

40 YEAR DISTURBANCE

LEGACY

1960’s EraSkid Trails

Dedicated for permanent traffic

system??

Page 38: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Pre Harvest (Residual) DisturbanceUnit Proportion by Disturbance Class

undist67%

dist22%

skid11%

Iron Canyon II Soil MonitoringDetermining Disturbance Extent

Page 39: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance Category: undist dist skid units

Bulk density 0.76 0.79 0.90 g/cm3

Iron Canyon II Soil MonitoringPre-Harvest Residual Disturbance

Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)

Region 5 Standard: 10% Porosity Reduction

Initial Db: 0.76

Threshold Db: 0.95

Page 40: Monitoring Impacts of Ground-Based Thinning on Soil Quality in a  Late Seral Reserve

Disturbance Category: undist dist skid units

Bulk density 0.76 0.79 0.90 g/cm3

Strength(10 month average)

984 1534 2314 kPa

Iron Canyon II Soil MonitoringPre-Harvest Residual Disturbance

Averages by Disturbance Category (10-20 cm depth)