monitor the quality of your master data

37
WWW.PLATON.NET Monitor the Quality of your Master Data THOMAS RAVN [email protected] March 16th th 2010, San Francisco

Upload: paniz

Post on 25-Feb-2016

62 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

DESCRIPTION

Monitor the Quality of your Master Data. THOMAS RAVN [email protected]. March 16th th 2010, San Francisco. Platon. A leading Information Management consulting firm Independent of software vendors Headquarter in Copenhagen, Denmark 220+ employees in 9 offices 300+ customers and 800+ projects - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

WWW.PLATON.NET

Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

THOMAS RAVN

[email protected]

March 16thth 2010, San Francisco

Page 2: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Platon

● A leading Information Management consulting firm

● Independent of software vendors

● Headquarter in Copenhagen, Denmark

● 220+ employees in 9 offices

● 300+ customers and 800+ projects

● Founded in 1999

● Employee owned company

“Platon received good feedback in our satisfaction survey. Clients cited the following strengths: experience and skill of consultants, business focus and the ability to remain focused on the needs of the client, and a strong methodological approach”

Gartner July 2008

2

Page 3: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Key Concepts and Definitions

MDM

“Information Management is the discipline of managing and leveraging information in a company as a strategic

asset”

“Master Data Management (MDM) is the structured management of Master

Data in terms of definitions, governance, architecture, technology

and processes”

DataGovernance

“Data Governance is the cross-functional discipline of managing,

improving, monitoring, maintaining, and protecting data”

Information Management

3

“Data Quality Management is the discipline of ensuring high quality data

in enterprise systems”

DQM

Page 4: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Components of an effective MDM approach

4

MDM

Business ownership,

responsibility, accountability

Common definitions

Effective Master Data processes

Data Quality Management

Protect, validate and

integrate data in IT

applications

IT Change control

Formalize business ownership and stewardship around data.

Ensure that Master Data is taken into account each and every time a

business process or an IT system is changed.

Control in which systems Master Data is entered and how it is

synchronized across systems.Manage Master Data Repository.

To be able to share data you need to share definitions and business rules. Definitions require management, rigor and documentation.

Capturing Master data efficiently needs to be built into the business processes. Equally consistent usage of Master Data needs to be ensured across business processes and business functions.

Measure and monitor the quality of data

Page 5: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Typical Data Problems - 1

5

No Name Address Purchase90328574 IBM 187 N.Pk. Str. Salem NH 01456 8,494.00

90328575 I.B.M. Inc. 187 N.Pk. St. Sarem NH 01456 3,432.00

90328575 International Bus. M. 187 No. Park St Salem NH 04156 2,243.00

09243242 Int. Bus. Machines 187 Park Ave Salem NH 04156 5,900.00

12398732 Inter-Nation Consults 15 Main St. Andover MA 02341 6,800.00

99643413 Int. Bus. Consultants PO Box 9 Boston MA 02210 10,243.00

43098436 I.B. Manufacturing Park Blvd. Boston MA 04106 15,999.00

How much did we spend with IBM last year?

Page 6: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Typical Data Problems - 2

6

Name Street Zip Code City

CAFÉ SPORTSCLUB 15 3rd Street 10001 New York

CAFÉ SPORT KLUB 15 Third St. . NYC

Is this the same customer?

Are these the same products?

Description, System 2

1 L Cappucino - Mathilde Cafe

FETA W/OLIVES & GARLIC 60G, 45+

1000 ML YOG. PEACH/BANANA

Description, System 1

1/1L Mathilde Cafe Ice Cappucino

45+ FETA M/OLI+HVIDL 60G, 45+

YOGHURT PÆRE/BANAN, 1000ML

Page 7: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Typical Problems - 3

● A common problem is overloading of fields, which is the misuse of a field compared to the intended use. Often because the field the user wanted to use wasn’t available in the application

● Sometimes a field might even have been used for different purposes by different parts of the organization

7

Customer No Name Email Fax

1234 John [email protected] Vip Customer

3368 Pete [email protected] Tel: 11223344

2345 Bob [email protected]

Page 8: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Where Does the Bad Data Come From?

8

State is a required field – regardless of country

Page 9: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Where Does the Bad Data Come From?

9

Page 10: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Top 5 Sources of Bad Data

1. Lack of ownership and clearly defined responsinility

2. Lack of common definitions for data

3. Lack of control of field usage

4. Lack of process control

5. Lack of synchronization between systems

10

Page 11: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

What is Good Data Quality?

11

Larry English:● Quality exists solely in the eye of a customer of a product or service based on the value they

perceive

● Information quality is consistently meeting ‘end customers’ expectations through information and information services, enabling them to perform their jobs effectively

● To define information quality, one must identify the "customer" of the data - the knowledge worker who requires data to perform his or her job

Platon definition:Data Quality is the degree to which data meets the defined standards

Page 12: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

“Information producers will create information only to the quality level for which they are trained, measured

and held accountable.”

Larry English

“The Law of Information Creation”

12

Page 13: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Data Standards & Data Quality

It’s all about the Meta Data…

13

● Good Meta Data is prequisite to achieve great data quality (inferred from the trained part of the ”Law of Information Creation”)

You can only achieve high quality data if you have standards to measure against!

Page 14: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Defining Good Data standards

14

● Business description

● Data entry format and conventions

● Definition owner

● Stakeholders

● Definition and keys

● Life cycle

● Classification(s)

● Hierarchies

For every entity define: For every field define:

Consider what a user needs to know to produce high quality data

● Business Owner(s)

Page 15: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon 15

Data Standards – An Example

Challenges● Relating the data definitions to the process documentation

● Keeping the definitions up to date

● The same piece of information may be entered in multiple different systems

Page 16: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Defining Good Data standards

● There are two basic approaches to defining your data standards1. Define a system independent Enterprise Information Model and then

map attributes to system fields, or

2. Define data definitions for a system (screen/table) specific view of data

● If you have one primary system where a data entity is used, option 2 is preferable

● If you have many different systems where the same data entity is used, option 1 is preferable

16

Page 17: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Generating Garbage

Garbage In = Garbage OutQualityStandard1 In + QualityStandard2 In

= Garbage Out

17

Page 18: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon 18

Data Quality Monitoring

● Like most other things, data quality can only be managed properly if it is measured and monitored

● A data quality monitoring concept is necessary to ensure that you identify

● Trends in data quality

● Data quality issues before they impact critical business processes

● Areas where process improvements are needed

Page 19: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Data Quality Monitoring

● For this to work, clearly-defined standards, targets for data quality and follow-up mechanisms are required

● There is little point in monitoring the quality of your data if no one in the business feels responsible and if clear business rules data have not yet been defined

● Thus a data quality monitoring concept should go hand in hand with a data governance model

19

Page 20: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

The Dimensions of Data Quality

Validity

Accuracy

Consist

encyIntegrity

DataQualityTimeliness

Complet

eness

Does data reflect the real world objects or a trusted source?

Are business rules on field and table relationships met? Are shared data elements

synchronized correct across the system landscape?

Do we have all required data?

Are all data values within the valid domain for the

field?

Are data available at the time needed?

20

Page 21: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

KPI Examples in the different dimensions

Dimension KPI Example

Completeness Pct of active customer records with an email address

Validity Pct of active US customers with a phone number of 10 digits

Accuracy Pct of active customers with an mailing address that is verified as correct against Dun & Bradstreet

Consistency Pct. of customer records shared between our CRM system and our ERP system that has identical values for name, address and telephone number.

Integrity Pct. of active product records with [type] = “Service” where [weight] = 0, or Pct. of open sales orders that refer to an active customer.

Timeliness Pct. of supplier records where the time from request of a new record to completion and release of the record is less then 24 hours

21

Page 22: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon 22

The Dimensions of Data Quality

Business Impact

Difficulty of Measurement

Completeness

Validity

Integrity

Timeliness

Consistency

Accuracy

Page 23: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon 23

The steps in building a monitoring concept

● Building a data quality monitoring concept involves the following five basic steps:

1. Identify stakeholders

2. Conduct interviews with stakeholders and selected business users

3. Identify data quality candidate KPI’s

4. Select KPI’s for data quality monitoring

5. For each KPI, define details

Page 24: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Finding Good Data Quality KPI’s

Perform a thorough data assessment (profiling) exercise searching for common data quality problems and look for abnormalities

Collect business input• Business process requirements• Data quality pain points• Business Intelligence• Business KPIs

XXX

XXX

XXX

XXXXXX

XXX XXX

XXX

XXX

DEFINED KPIs

KPI Frq Target UoM

A

B

C

KPI Candidates

● To find good data quality KPIs collect business input through interviews with stakeholders (use Interviewing Technique) and a data assessment. The technique Data Profiling contains more details on how to analyze data

24

Page 25: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Tying Data Quality KPIs to Business Processes

● It is essential that KPIs are not just made up, so your organization has something to measure

● Don’t measure data quality because it’s great to have high quality data. Measure it because your business processes depend on it

● Derive data quality KPIs from business process requirements

● Start with a high level business process like procurement (also known as a macro process) and then break it down.

25

Page 26: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Tying Data Quality KPIs to Business Processes

Procurement

No duplicate vendors

Correct industry code for vendors

Correct placement in

hierarchy (parent vendor)

Correct email address for

vendors

Business Meta Data

DEFINED KPIs

KPI Frq Target UoM

A

B

C

Data quality requirements

Business Meta Data is required to define the actual KPIs.

Ex: A vendor record is uniquely defined as an address of a vendor where we place orders, receive shipments from or…..

Define the data entities used within

the process Material Master Data

Data Entity Scope

Macro process

Process

Is the required data quality aspect meaningful to monitor?

It may be better to improve data validation or perhaps problems are not

experienced

Spend analysis Vendor Selection

26

Vendor Master Data

Page 27: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Tying Data Quality KPIs to Business Processes

● Using a simple model like the one illustrated on the previous slide allows you to tie data quality KPIs to business processes and to business stakeholders

● This relationship is critical for the success of the data quality monitoring initiative. Clearly illustrating how poor data quality impacts specific business processes is instrumental in getting the executive support and the business buy in

● When conducting data quality KPI interviews you may encounter KPI suggestions like “measure if there is a valid relationship between gross weight and product type”. Ask why this is important and which process this is important for

● A particular data quality KPI may be important for multiple different processes. Document the relationship to all relevant processes

27

Page 28: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Defining Data Quality KPI’s

● Data quality KPIs should express the important characteristics of quality of a particular data element

● Typically units of measures are percentages, ratios, or number of occurrences

● For consistency reasons, try to harmonize the measures. If for instance one measure is “number of customers without a postal code” while another is “percentage of customers with a valid VAT-no” a list of measures will look strange, since one measure should be as high as possible, and the other as low as possible

● A good simple approach is to define all data quality KPI’s as percentages, with a 100% meaning all records meet the criteria behind this KPI

● Be careful not to define too many measures, as this will just make the organizational implementation more difficult

● Pay attention to controlling fields (like material type) that may determine rules like whether a specific attribute is required

28

Page 29: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Defining Hierarchies

● Use hierarchical measures where possible, so that measures can be rolled up in regions and countries for instance

● In the below example a KPI related to customer data is broken down in individual countries to allow detailed follow up

● A concern here is that fields may be used differently in different countries. Given the below data insight, it might make sense to define a separate KPI’s for CA and perhaps ignore MX and US

KPI: Customer Fax number

correctly formatted

US Customers

CA Customers

MX Customers

5%

43%

77%

Value

Avg. Value

25%

Recs

85,000

38,000

19,000

Data Insight● Fax numbers are not required for US

customers since all communication is done via email.

● Fax is the primary communication channel with Canadian customers.

● Only some customers in Mexico have a fax machine.

29

Page 30: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Defining KPI Thresholds

● Along with each KPI two thresholds should be defined:● Lowest acceptable value

● Without specifying the lowest acceptable value (or worst value), it’s difficult to know when to react

● If the measure falls below this threshold action is required

● Target value● Without target values, you don’t know when the quality is ok. Remember

fit-for-purpose

● Specifying a low and target threshold allows for traffic light reporting that provides an easy overview

● Defining appropriate thresholds can be difficult as even a single product record with wrong dimensions may cause serious process impact. But without any indication of when to be alerted any form of automated monitoring is difficult

Target Value: 95 %

Lowest acceptable value: 80 %

30

Page 31: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon 31

Indirect Measures

● Consider critical fields (e.g. weight of a product or customer type)

where the correct value is of utmost importance, but it’s close to

impossible to define the rules to check if a new value entered is

correct….

● One approach is to measure indirectly by for instance reporting

what users have changed these values for which products over the

last 24 hours, week or whatever is appropriate in your organization

Page 32: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Cross field KPIs and Process KPIs

● Common KPIs that are not related to a single field● Number of new customer records created this week

● Average time from request to completion of a new material record

● Number of materials with a non-unique description (or pct. of materials with a unique description)

● Number of vendors, where a different payment is defined in different purchasing organizations

● Number of open sales orders referring to an inactive customer

32

Page 33: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Think Prevention!

● Every possible business rule related to completeness, integrity, consistency and validity should be enforced by the system at the time of data entry.

● If it isn’t, consider implementing a data input validation rule rather than allowing bad data to be entered and then measure it!

● However, there are cases, where the business logic of a field is too ambiguous to be enforced by a simple input validation rule.

● Process (workflow) adjustments may also be the answer.

33

Page 34: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon 34

Documentation of KPIs

KPI Name: A meaningful name of the KPI that expresses what is being measured

Objective: Why do you measure this? What business processes are impacted if there data is not ok?

Dimensions: What data quality dimensions (integrity, validity, etc.) are this KPI related to?

Frequency of measure: How often do you wish to report on this KPI? Daily, daily, weekly or monthly?

Unit of measure: What is the unit of the KPI? Number of records, pct of records, number of bad values, etc.?

Lowest acceptable measure:

Threshold that indicates if the data quality aspect the KPI represents is at a minimal acceptable level. The value here must be in the unit of measure of the KPI.

Target value: At what value is the KPI considered to represent data quality at a high level?

Responsible: The person responsible for the particular KPI.

Formula: The tables and fields that are used to analyze and calculate the KPI. This is the functional design formula that forms the basis for the technical implementation.

Hierarchies: When reporting on a KPI it is very useful to be able to slice and dice the measure according to different dimensions or hierarchies. For a customer data KPI for instance, good hierarchies would be regions, country, company code and account group. Being able to view the KPI through a hierarchy also makes it easier to follow up with specific groups of business users.

Notes and assumptions: If certain assumptions are made about the KPI make sure to document it here

Page 35: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon 35

Remember!

● Quality is in the Eye of the beholder!

● Data quality is defined by our Information Customers

● Data is not always clean or dirty in itself – it may depend on the viewpoint and a defined standard

● Focus on what’s important to those that use the data

Page 36: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon

Monitoring Process

● A simple example

36

Publish KPI

Analyze KPIs

Evaluate root cause

Implement Improvements

Plan corrective

actions

Low value in

KPI?

Y

N

Page 37: Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

© Platon 37

Monitor the Quality of your Master Data

Thomas RavnPractice Director, MDM

E: [email protected]: +1 646-400-2862

PLATON US INC.5 PENN PLAZA, 23rd FloorNEW YORK NY 10001 www.platon.net