module 3 - job analysis, job design, job evaluation

73

Upload: charmaine-dalisay

Post on 19-Jan-2017

375 views

Category:

Recruiting & HR


12 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 2: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

The Role of Human Resources in the Organization

A Paradigm of Human Resources Management

Job Organization and

Information

Acquisition

Maintenance

Development

Research on Human

Resources

J O B S

PEOPLE

- knowledge

- skills

- attitudes

- potentialities

- needs

- values

Page 3: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

HR Information

Employee Relations Industrial Relations

Job Analysis

Training

Appraisal

Rewards and Recognition

Planning, Recruitment, Selection and

Placement

Page 4: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 5: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 6: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

The process of: studying positions, of describing the duties and

responsibilities that go with jobs, of grouping similar positions into job

categories. (Sison, 2003)

It is the building block of everything that personnel does. (Noe/Hollenbeck/Gerhart/Wright, 2008)

Page 7: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Example: Administrative officer

Job purpose : To provide assistance to the company in overseeing and conducting medical readiness, recruiting, training management, supply management, maintenance, security, safety, personnel management, administrative, and public relations programs.

Key duties/responsibilities of Administrative officer: 1. Works with other units to coordinate and plan

fund-raising, grants, marketing, communications, and outreach activities.

2. Independently carries out a portfolio of responsibilities under the department’s purview, such as managing committees, securing approvals, and providing communications.

3. Provide expert guidance and leadership to more junior staff.

studying positions

of describing the duties and

responsibilities

Page 8: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Administrative Officer

Administrative Assistant

HRMO

Clerk

Accountant

Financial Analyst

Budget Officer

Account Specialist

Example: of grouping similar positions into job categories

Page 9: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

What the work is

How it is done

Why the work is done The link of the

work to other jobs

The skills required/

qualifications

The supervision & guidance

needed

The environment

under which it is done

Page 10: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

1. The organization is commencing operations. 2. A new job is created. 3. A job is changed due to:

- the nature of operations - new methods or

technology introduction - restructuring - company expansion or

reduction

Page 11: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Job information

Methods of securing job information

Company policy and administration of the program

- Purpose - Who are the person responsible

- Details needed - When to update

- How will the information be gathered

Page 12: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

– the person who studies jobs, process or exploration of job analysis.

Page 13: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

general intelligence good knowledge of the business or company’s

practices keen analytical ability good judgment and acumen (insight) proficiency in language familiarity with the company policies, and the

organizational structure pleasing personality tactful and diplomatic must get along well with people.

Page 14: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

In doing the

following can be expected:

2. Job titles may or may not be able to capture job content Example: Sales Executive and Sales Representative

3. Job descriptions and job specifications cannot be uniform across organizations Example: Administrative Officer

1. Duties and responsibilities and skills that go with the jobs differ Example: HRMO and Clerk

Page 15: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

1. Job description – - level of duties and tasks - the responsibilities - training - experience required - the working conditions - the relation of the job to the other jobs

2. Job specification – personal qualifications - personality trait - knowledge - skills - abilities - other characteristics

3. Job Profile - key result areas - functions and roles

and competencies

“All describe the job with emphasis”

Page 16: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

1. Serve as guide for Recruitment,

selection, placement, and employee

counseling

2. Serve as basis for Job evaluation and

salary determination

3. Job hierarchy for promotion and transfer

4. Performance standards setting

5. Work procedures review and work conditions review

6. Job design and redesign

8. Inventory of positions and

employees

7. Training and supervision needs

Page 17: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Job Description

&

Job Specification

I. Job Identification

II. Basic Function

III. Principal Functions

and Responsibilities

IV. Key Organizational Relationships

V. Qualification Guides

Page 18: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Detailed

Job Specification

I. Skill and Know-How

Leadership/Managerial Technical/Functional Behavioral/Interpersonal

II. Mental Processes

Types of problems Guidance received

III. Accountability Limits of authority Size Impact

Page 19: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Role description

&

Competency

Profile

I. Job Identification

II. Mission

III. Roles and Responsibilities

IV. Competency Profile Leadership Managerial Knowledge Communication Skills Political Savvy Integrity Health

Page 20: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

(Sison, 2003)

1. Questionnaire 2. Interview 3. Observation 4. Draft and Review

Other sources (Decenzo, 2007) cited the foll. methods used: 1. Observation method 2. Individual interview method 3. Group interview method 4. Structured questionnaire method 5. Technical conference method 6. Diary method

Other sources (Decenzo, 2007) cited the foll. methods used: 1. Observation method 2. Individual interview method 3. Group interview method 4. Structured questionnaire method

Page 21: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

(Sison, 2003)

1. Questionnaire

Sample Forms:

a.Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ) – an instrument based on the statistical analysis of worker-oriented job elements developed by McCormick, Jeanneret and Mechan in 1972.

b.Job Components Inventory – initiated in Britain used in curriculum development and broad-based training.

Page 22: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

1. Questionnaire

Items in Position Analysis Questionnaire (PAQ)

1. Information input – where and how the worker gets the information he uses for his job.

2. Mental process – the reasoning, planning, decision-making, etc., involved in the job.

3. Work output – the physical activities performed and the tools or equipment used.

4. Job context – physical & social contexts or settings

5. Relationships with other persons

6. Other Job Characteristics – schedule, responsibilities, pay

ITEMS

35

14

49

36

19

41

Source: (Decenzo, 2007)

Page 23: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

(Sison, 2003)

1. Questionnaire

Job Components Inventory –

Tools and equipment

Perceptual and physical requirements

Mathematical requirements

Communication requirements

Decision-making and responsibility

Page 24: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

(Sison, 2003)

1. Questionnaire

Steps: a) the questionnaire is designed b) it is distributed to the employees through their

supervisors c) the employee submits it to his supervisor d) the job analyst summarizes the facts and writes

the description of and specifications for the job e) the job forms are grouped into similar

categories to establish definite job groupings.

Page 25: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

(Sison, 2003)

2. Interview

Steps: a) The job analyst prepares a form

b) He notes down the facts

c) Writes out the job description and job specification.

d)A copy of the job description and the job specification is sent to the supervisor and employee concerned for checking.

Page 26: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

(Sison, 2003)

3. Observation

4. Draft and Review Write a draft of job description and job specification for review, corrections and for approval of final job description document.

Page 27: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 28: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 29: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 30: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 31: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Lack of Management

Support

Lack of Support from Employees

Biasness of Job Analyst

Using Single Data Source

Inability to Identify the Need

of Job Analysis

Page 32: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Job analysis

Job description

Job specifications

Labor Relations Recruiting Selection

Safety and Health Human Resource Planning

Compensation Employee Training

Performance Management Employee Development Career Development

Page 33: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 34: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 35: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

The process of defining how work will be performed and what tasks will be required in a given job. (Noe/Hollenbeck/Gerhart/Wright, 2008)

Job redesign – a similar process that involves changing an existing job design.

Purpose: - to improve quality,

work efficiency and productivity

Page 36: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Design for Mental Capacity

Ways to simplify job’s

mental demands:

• Filtering information

• Clear displays

and instructions

• Memory aids

Design for Efficiency

(Industrial Engineering)

Design for Motivation

Techniques:

• Job enlargement

• Job enrichment

• Teamwork

• Flexibility

Design for Safety and Health

(Ergonomics)

– individual’s physiology and physical work environment

Page 37: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Occupational Safety and Health Administration proposed in 2001 to protect the workers from ergonomic hazards: 1. Using keyboard for four

straight hours without a break.

2. Lifting more than 75 pounds. 3. Kneeling or squatting more

than two hours a day. 4. Using large vibrating

equipment such as chainsaws more than 30 minutes a day.

Page 38: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

developed by Richard Hackman and Greg Oldham

More

Motivation

Less

Motivation

Many skills

needed

Whole peace of

work is completed

Major impact

on others

Much freedom

to make decisions

Effectiveness

readily apparent

Skill Variety

Task

Identity

Task

Significance

Autonomy

Feedback

Few skills

needed

Work in a small

part of the whole

Minor impact

on others

Difficult to see

effectiveness

Decisions made

by others

More satisfied

Produce more

and better work

Page 39: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 40: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Is the process of determining the worth of one job in relation to that of the other jobs in the company so that a fair and equitable wage and salary system can be established.

Page 41: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

Ranking jobs

It is used to determine the organization’s pay structure

Page 42: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

1. Equal pay for equal work.

2. Differences in pay must be based on differences in work.

3. Pay levels must be related to existing community pay scales.

Page 43: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

1.Compensating employees is just a method of establishing the equitable pay of jobs. It is not a guarantee to solve all problems.

2.Top management should engage in job evaluation by supporting the committee.

3.In a unionized environment, it is important to engage the union in the program.

Page 44: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

1. Non-quantitative Methods – the job as a whole is compared to other jobs in terms of its elements or component parts. a. The Ranking Method b. The Position Classification or Grade Description

Method

2. Quantitative Methods – the job is broken down into its characteristics and evaluated by the use of factors in a standard rating scale previously set up. a. The Point System or Point-Rating Method b. The Factor Comparison System c. The Hay Method

Page 45: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 46: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

a. The Ranking Method – process of comparing

and ranking a job based on the overall judgment

Advantages 1. Simple and easy to understand; 2. Little time is required; 3. Accurate (few jobs to be ranked) and allows easy

adjustments in rank.

Disadvantages 1. Subjectivity 2. No defined basis 3. Ranking only – does not determine the rank difference

4. Not suited for all – especially for large organization

Page 47: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

b. The Position Classification or Grade Description Method - grouping jobs by comparing

each job against a rating scale comprising several job grades

Procedure – 1. a rating scale was designed made up of several classes or grades in ascending steps 2. each job is rated by matching the closest grade description

Page 48: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 49: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 50: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

b. The Position Classification or Grade Description Method Advantages

1. Simple and easy to prepare a rating scale and a grade description; 2. Grade description can be made comprehensive; 3. Can easily be explained to the employees; 4. Easy to use and takes little time to rate

jobs.

Page 51: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

b. The Position Classification or Grade Description Method Disadvantages

1. Grade descriptions need to be carefully written to avoid either too broad or too narrow to include or exclude jobs; 2. Disagreements may exist as to the

assignment of a particular job to a particular grade; Higher job levels are difficult to classify.

Page 52: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 53: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

a. The Point System or Point-Rating Method - evaluates the job by appraising it separately

against each of the factors

Procedure – 1.Construct a rating scale or guide consisting of

selected elements with their corresponding weights or point values.

2.Decide how many job groups needed and develop a rating scale for each of these groups.

3.Choose the factors that the company considers important in its operations and valuation of jobs.

Page 54: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 55: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 56: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

a. The Point System or Point-Rating Method

Procedure – 4. Define each factor and the degrees within each factor that will allow clear and consistent rating. 5. Rate the job and summed it up to arrive at the sum

of evaluation for each job. 6. Review the evaluation for each job across all job

factors. 7. Review the job ranking based on the total points

earned and the logic of the resulting ranking. 8. Rank the total points and the jobs from highest to

lowest.

Page 57: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

a. The Point System or Point-Rating Method

Advantages – 1. Clear, specific and focused because of the graphic and

descriptive types of rating scales 2. The number of classes desired can be pre-determined

and is easy to distribute the point values 3. Rating scale is basically fair to all. The results of the job

evaluation can easily be communicated; 4. Errors in judgment are reduced to a minimum and

intentional bias is easy to detect and is therefore less apt to occur; this type of evaluation is more difficult to “doctor”.

Page 58: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

a. The Point System or Point-Rating Method

Disadvantages – 1.The point system is difficult to construct;

2.The point system is not easy to explain; hence only trained and experienced evaluators are entrusted in explaining it.

3.Time-consuming.

Page 59: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

b. The Factor Comparison System (Factor-by-factor basis)

- each job be compared and ranked with the other jobs under its separate factor

Procedures – 1. Composition of evaluation committee is selected; 2. The committee should be furnished with an analysis of the jobs and written job descriptions and specifications of the jobs to be evaluated; 3. The factors upon which jobs should be compared are then selected and carefully defined--

Page 60: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

b. The Factor Comparison System

Procedures –

Five factors used in comparing the jobs: 1. Skill requirement 2. Mental requirement 3. Physical effort 4. Working conditions 5. Responsibility

Page 61: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

b. The Factor Comparison System

Procedures – 4. Factors are subdivided into degrees like in the Point- Rating Method. 5. The most striking trait of the factor-comparison method is its reliance on “key jobs” as the “reference points” or “anchor points” for all the other jobs. 6. Ranking of jobs and then comparing the factors present in the job against the factors in the key jobs, one factor at a time, and then arranging the jobs from the highest to lowest or the other way around.

Page 62: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

b. The Factor Comparison System

KEY JOB: Admin Officer

Skill requirement

Mental requirement

Physical effort

Working conditions

Responsibility

HRMO

Skill requirement

Mental requirement

Physical effort

Working conditions

Responsibility

Points

Page 63: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

c. The Hay Method

Developed three factor-comparison

1. Degree of know-how – sum total of every kind of skill.

2. Degree of problem solving – for analyzing, creating, reasoning, arriving at and making conclusion.

3. Degree of accountability – the answerability for action

Page 64: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

c. The Hay Method

Stages:

1. Benchmark Selection

2. Position Analysis

3. Position Evaluation

4. Compensation Survey

5. Policies and Procedures

Page 65: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

c. The Hay Method

Advantages – 1.Specific 2.Rating scale is basically fair to all 3.Intentional bias is easy to detect Disadvantages – 1. It’s difficult and complex; 2.Time-consuming; 3.Not easy to explain to employees; 4.It is also heavy dependent on outside consultants.

Page 66: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 67: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

1. Job Analysis

2. Selecting a Job Evaluation Plan and Preparing Manual

3. Installing the Program

4. Job Grading

5. Design Salary Structure

6. Wage and Salary Survey

7. Establishing Policies

8. Administering the Program

9. Performance Evaluation Merit Reward/ Performance Level Ranking

10. Salary Increases or Adjustments by Legislation

Page 68: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 69: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

If you were the recruitment officer, training supervisor, personnel officer, or a short-listed applicant, what job data and dimensions would you need? Would you recast the ad if you were to release another one next week?

Page 70: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

FINANCIAL TRAINEES

A growing professional financial organization providing a range of retail financial services is now seeking applications from young and motivated individuals who want to pursue a career in financial cooperativism and micro-finance.

Minimum qualifications for the position of Financial Trainee are: • Personable and with good communication skills; • Can easily relate to individuals of different backgrounds and

orientation; • With business sense and above average academic background; • Age: between 21-24 years old; • Graduates of any business course, but preferably Business,

Accounting, Finance of Marketing; • Requires minimum supervision and a team player.

Successful candidates must attend and pass the Institution’s Financial Entrepreneurship Program before they can assume formal employment.

(Details on how to submit resume follow)

Page 71: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

1. Personnel Administration in the Philippine Government Buendia, Daisy Peralta, 2008

2. Personnel and Human Resources Management, Sixth Edition Perfecto S. Sison, 1991

3. Personnel Management in the 21st Century, Seventh Edition Perfecto S. Sison, 2003

4. Fundamentals of Human Resource Management, Ninth Edition David A. Decenzo, Stephen P. Robbins C & E Publishing, 2007

5. Fundamentals of Human Resource Management, Second Edition McGraw-Hill International Edition Noe/Hollenbeck/Gerhart/Wright, 2008

6. http://www.managementstudyguide.com/job-analysis-problems.htm

7. http://www.cedu.niu.edu/~bailey/ftf564/jobdes.pdf

8. http://excell.csc.gov.ph/cscweb/PMS.html

Page 72: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation
Page 73: Module 3 - Job Analysis, Job Design, Job Evaluation

MANAGER PLANS & SETS GOALS EMPLOYEE CARRYING

OUT PLANS

ACHIEVING GOALS

In general, you must have a plan to best organize the work of your unit, to motivate and lead your people to peak performance and to control the outcome of their efforts.