modern and postmodern economic history and postmodern... · modern and postmodern economic history...

25
1 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over the last five hundred years. It will include topics such as: writing Global history and tackling problems like eurocentrism; the Great Divergence between Europe and Asia in which Europe developed and expanded at the expense of the Asian share of world GDP; the Needham question – why did China not have a scientific revolution? Why did not China, India or Japan expand into the Americas, Africa or Europe?; preindustrial economies and the state in early modern Europe; Malthus and issues of demography; the role of women in early modern Europe; proto-industry; agriculture; markets; Smithian growth through trade and Schumpeterian growth through technological change; technology and science – was tacit knowledge transmitted face to face by skilled artisans more important than the scientific revolution?; the military revolution and the costs and benefits of violent conflict; industrialisation, sources of energy and ecology; why did the industrial revolution occur in England?; did Imperial China suffer from a high level equilibrium trap?; mercantilism, long distance trade and European merchant empires; the Spanish colonial system, the treasure galleons bringing bullion from the Americas and causing inflation in Europe and China (via the Manila trade); the slave plantation economy of the American South and the American Civil War; the Mughal empire in India, the rise of the East India Company and the British Raj; the debate around gentlemanly capitalism, the imperialism of free trade and the Hobson-Lenin thesis of empire; British settler colonies and staple crops; Henry Ford and the moving assembly line; the Great Depression and the New Deal; the Gold Standard, inflation and central banks. Course Aims and Objectives This course aims to build on students’ prior knowledge and to encourage them to make broad comparisons across wide geographical spaces and chronological time frames. The course seeks to expose students to a wide range of historical subjects of relevance to the development of the world economy in the last five hundred years and to encourage them to gain the insight and analytical skills necessary to draw out key concepts and points. The course cannot aim to be in any way comprehensive in covering such a wide subject matter, and is necessarily selective in choosing particular historical case studies and concepts. Students will be expected to form their own conclusions as to which features of the history set out are of paramount importance, which were decisive in historical causation, and which are of the greatest contemporary relevance to those looking at the world economy today. Economists have a tendency to see contemporary problems in a rather short term perspective; students taking this course should gain a much needed macrotemporal perspective on the long term causes of divergent economic growth trajectories. Introductory Lecture: Longue Durée Economic Growth, Global History, and the Return of the Metanarrative.

Upload: vodung

Post on 11-Mar-2019

255 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

1 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Modern and Postmodern Economic History

Course Description

This course covers episodes from Global economic history over the last five hundred years. It will

include topics such as: writing Global history and tackling problems like eurocentrism; the Great

Divergence between Europe and Asia in which Europe developed and expanded at the expense of

the Asian share of world GDP; the Needham question – why did China not have a scientific

revolution? Why did not China, India or Japan expand into the Americas, Africa or Europe?;

preindustrial economies and the state in early modern Europe; Malthus and issues of demography;

the role of women in early modern Europe; proto-industry; agriculture; markets; Smithian growth

through trade and Schumpeterian growth through technological change; technology and science –

was tacit knowledge transmitted face to face by skilled artisans more important than the scientific

revolution?; the military revolution and the costs and benefits of violent conflict; industrialisation,

sources of energy and ecology; why did the industrial revolution occur in England?; did Imperial

China suffer from a high level equilibrium trap?; mercantilism, long distance trade and European

merchant empires; the Spanish colonial system, the treasure galleons bringing bullion from the

Americas and causing inflation in Europe and China (via the Manila trade); the slave plantation

economy of the American South and the American Civil War; the Mughal empire in India, the rise of

the East India Company and the British Raj; the debate around gentlemanly capitalism, the

imperialism of free trade and the Hobson-Lenin thesis of empire; British settler colonies and staple

crops; Henry Ford and the moving assembly line; the Great Depression and the New Deal; the Gold

Standard, inflation and central banks.

Course Aims and Objectives

This course aims to build on students’ prior knowledge and to encourage them to make broad

comparisons across wide geographical spaces and chronological time frames. The course seeks to

expose students to a wide range of historical subjects of relevance to the development of the world

economy in the last five hundred years and to encourage them to gain the insight and analytical

skills necessary to draw out key concepts and points. The course cannot aim to be in any way

comprehensive in covering such a wide subject matter, and is necessarily selective in choosing

particular historical case studies and concepts. Students will be expected to form their own

conclusions as to which features of the history set out are of paramount importance, which were

decisive in historical causation, and which are of the greatest contemporary relevance to those

looking at the world economy today. Economists have a tendency to see contemporary problems in

a rather short term perspective; students taking this course should gain a much needed

macrotemporal perspective on the long term causes of divergent economic growth trajectories.

Introductory Lecture: Longue Durée Economic Growth, Global History, and the Return of the

Metanarrative.

Page 2: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

2 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Postmodernism and its disciples reject the possibility of offering 'metanarratives' of the human

experience, perceiving value only in the voices of the dispossessed and challenging the

epistemological underpinnings of history as a discipline. Like many doctrinaire approaches to the

study of our species postmodernism contains its own contradictions, for is not any methodology or

system of thought which claims to be universal in its validity itself a meta narrative? Knowledge that

is not to be fragmentary and incoherent requires marshalling into theoretical, explanatory or

narrative frameworks. It is also difficult to posit philosophical reasons why one scale of comparison

between social units, for example a village as against its neighbour, is intrinsically more valid than

another such as England vs. Japan. Any boundary between an acceptable frame of comparison and

one that is too wide is impossible to draw other than arbitrarily. The conviction that it is both useful

and important to draw comparisons and chart connections across great distances of time and space

has given rise to the field of global history – predominantly the domain of economic historians. The

rising contemporary significance of transnational economic and cultural forces has urged the

question how far back does globalization go? Looking at history in the long run and on a global scale

is an onerous task beset with difficulties, but it is one that well rewards the effort and which offers

unique insights and perspectives on the past. We shall start with the question of when globalization

began, and put forward a toolkit of useful frameworks for analysing global economic change over

time.

Seminar 1: China, the Needham Question and the Great Divergence.

The Great Divergence between Europe and Asia and its causes are central to global history. Why did

early modern science and technology advance so far in Europe? Why did global trading empires

emerge from the geographically small western end of the Eurasian landmass? Addressing the

Needham question, why was it not China that developed early modern science? Why did not China,

India or Japan expand into the Americas, Africa or Europe?

Reading:

Robert Finlay, China, the West, and World History in Joseph Needham's "Science and Civilisation in

China", Journal of World History, Vol. 11, No. 2 (Fall, 2000), pp. 265-303, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20078851

Stephen Broadberry and Bishnupriya Gupta, ‘The Early Modern Great Divergence: Wages, Prices and

Economic Development in Europe and Asia, 1500-1800’, The Economic History Review, New Series,

Vol. 59, No. 1 (Feb., 2006), pp. 2-31, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3806001

Kenneth Pomeranz, ‘Is There an East Asian Development Path? Long-Term Comparisons, Constraints,

and Continuities’, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient , Vol. 44, No. 3 (2001), pp.

322-362, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3632355

Joel Mokyr, ‘Eurocentricity Triumphant’ , The American Historical Review , Vol. 104, No. 4 (Oct.,

1999), pp. 1241-1246, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2649575

Page 3: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

3 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Jack A. Goldstone, ‘Efflorescences and Economic Growth in World History: Rethinking the "Rise of

the West" and the Industrial Revolution’, Journal of World History, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Fall, 2002), pp.

323-389, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/20078976

Further Reading:

Kenneth Pomeranz, ‘Chinese Development in Long-Run Perspective’, Proceedings of the American

Philosophical Society, Vol. 152, No. 1 (Mar., 2008), pp. 83-100, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/25478470

Kenneth Pomeranz, ‘Political Economy and Ecology on the Eve of Industrialization: Europe, China,

and the Global Conjuncture’, The American Historical Review, Vol. 107, No. 2 (April 2002), pp. 425-

446, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/532293

P. H. H. Vries, ‘Are Coal and Colonies Really Crucial? Kenneth Pomeranz and the Great Divergence’,

Journal of World History, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Fall, 2001), pp. 407-446, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20078914

Yong Xue, ‘A "Fertilizer Revolution"? A Critical Response to Pomeranz's Theory of "Geographic

Luck"’, Modern China, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Apr., 2007), pp. 195-229, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20062667

Timothy Brook, ‘The Sinology of Joseph Needham’, Modern China, Vol. 22, No. 3 (Jul., 1996), pp. 340-

348, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/189191

Lecture 1: Malthus, Demography and the Cambridge School.

Malthus in his Essay on Population expressed a central problem of economic growth in the

premodern (and perhaps modern?) world – populations he argued increase geometrically because of

the irresistible ‘passion of the sexes’, which can only be restricted by famines or by preventative

measures that control fertility (restricting sex outside of marriage and delaying marriage for

example), while even in a growing economy food production can only increase arithmetically. Are

populations doomed to grow beyond their food supply? Must they always eat up the proceeds of

growth? How did they escape from the Malthusian trap and from subsistence crises?

Seminar 2: Malthus, Population and the Food Supply.

The ideas of Malthus. Was pre-modern Europe afflicted by Malthusian crises or checks on population

growth? The ideas of the Cambridge school – the importance of demography for development. How

useful are Malthus's ideas in the modern era? Many are now inclined to say that Malthus was wrong

because technology has rescued our species from the threat of continual checks on population

growth, as evidenced by the massive increase in the world's population. However Malthus's

fundamental insight is surely that we suffer from limited land and resources, and even if we discover

untapped resources the fact remains that resources are finite. While technology may push up the

'ceiling' for the possible human population by allowing us to utilise resources more efficiently, there

Page 4: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

4 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

remains a 'possibility-production frontier' for humanity as a whole that could only be escaped by

infinite technological progress and ultimately an alchemical trick to make something out of nothing.

Reading:

Chapter 7, ‘Why poverty was inevitable in traditional societies’ in E. A. Wrigley’s (2004): Poverty,

Progress and Population.

Thomas Malthus (1798): ‘An Essay on the Principle of Population’, available at

http://www.esp.org/books/malthus/population/malthus.pdf

Further Reading:

Cormac Ó Gráda, ‘Markets and Famines in Pre-Industrial Europe’, The Journal of Interdisciplinary

History, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Autumn, 2005), pp. 143-166, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3656154

Nigar Hashimzade, ‘Famines without shortages’, Oxford Economic Papers 58 (2006), pp. 636–654,

available at http://oep.oxfordjournals.org/content/58/4/636.full.pdf+html

Robert Dorfman, ‘Thomas Robert Malthus and David Ricardo’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives,

Vol. 3, No. 3 (Summer, 1989), pp. 153-164, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1942767

Lecture 2: Is Europe Different? The Problem of Eurocentrism.

Given that specific regions within Europe became predominant through trade and imperial expansion

how do we present a fair and balanced picture of the world? How do we deal with the problem of

eurocentrism? How do we account for counterfactual alternatives to Europe's rise without seeing it

as inevitable and thus embracing a form of historical determinism? If we redress the balance by

emphasising economies that have been resurgent (China, Japan and India) in recent decades are we

not equally guilty of emphasising some geographic regions and civilisations at the expense of others

(for example, Africa)?

Seminar 3: Ecology and the Retreat of the Elephants from Southern China.

Contemporary debates over climate change, environmental damage and sustainability remind us to

consider the development of economies not merely in terms of GDP and technological advancement

but also to consider the ecosystems in which expanding human economies exist. Historical case

studies point to the vast changes which can take place in the landscape through deforestation and

species extinction, and to human populations through desertification, land exhaustion, draught and

pollution. How can we recast the history of economic development to take account of ecology?

Reading:

Ray Bush, ‘Drought and Famines’, Review of African Political Economy, No. 33, War and Famine

(Aug., 1985), pp. 59-63, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/4005668

Page 5: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

5 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Peter C. Perdue, ‘The Retreat of the Elephants: An Environmental History of China by Mark Elvin

Review’, T'oung Pao, Second Series, Vol. 91, Fasc. 4/5 (2005), pp. 436-445, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/4529016

Lillian M. Li, ‘The Retreat of the Elephants: An Environmental History of China by Mark Elvin Review’,

Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, Vol. 65, No. 2 (Dec., 2005), pp. 499-505, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/25066788

Further Reading:

Robert B. Marks, ‘The Retreat of the Elephants: An Environmental History of China by Mark Elvin

Review’, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, Vol. 36, No. 2 (Autumn, 2005), pp. 313-315,

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3656207

James R. Hudson, ‘Braudel's Ecological Perspective’, Sociological Forum, Vol. 2, No. 1 (Winter, 1987),

pp. 146-165, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/684532

If accessible please see Jared Diamond’s (2005) Guns, Germs and Steel: the Fates of Human Societies,

Mark Elvin’s (2006) The Retreat of the Elephants: An Environmental History of China, and Fernand

Braudel’s (1996) The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II (2 vols.).

Lecture 3: Adam Smith, Specialisation and Markets.

We will explore Smith’s great 1776 work An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of

Nations more commonly known as the Wealth of Nations. Smith was concerned with ethical

questions as well as material ones, and yet recognized that ‘It is not from the benevolence of the

butcher, the brewer, or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own

interest.’ Smith advanced the example of pin-making to reveal how specialization (which required

exchange, and hence trade) could further advance human productivity. What insights did Adam

Smith and other classical economists have into the nature of economic activity? Why did the idea of

looking at the world through this prism arise at this particular point? And were classical economic

theories, with their conception of ‘diminishing returns’ on capital investment already out of pace with

the changes that were taking place in technology, energy and productivity at the time? Did Adam

Smith expect growth through trade and specialization to peter out in Britain as it had done in the

Netherlands?

Seminar 4: How Much do Religion and Cosmology Matter?

Even in our own time it is clear that religion is a force that cannot be overlooked. Economic models

of migration take little or no account of belief systems and yet these can profoundly affect the

choices made by individuals and families in society and the economy. We will explore case studies

that remind us how significant religion can be, even when intermixed with material, political and

other considerations.

Reading:

Page 6: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

6 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Alan Heston, ‘Crusades and Jihads: A Long-Run Economic Perspective’, Annals of the American

Academy of Political and Social Science, Vol. 588, Islam: Enduring Myths and Changing Realities (Jul.,

2003), pp. 112-135, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1049857

Reuben Fine, ‘The Protestant Ethic and the Analytic Ideal’, Political Psychology , Vol. 4, No. 2 (Jun.,

1983), pp. 245-264, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3790937

Anthony J. Dachs, ‘Missionary Imperialism-The Case of Bechuanaland’, The Journal of African History,

Vol. 13, No. 4 (1972), pp. 647-658, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/180759

Further reading:

J. A. Raftis, ‘Western Monasticism and Economic Organization’, Comparative Studies in Society and

History, Vol. 3, No. 4 (Jul., 1961), pp. 452-469, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/177665

Daniel T. Reff, ‘The "Predicament of Culture" and Spanish Missionary Accounts of the Tepehuan and

Pueblo Revolts’, Ethnohistory, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Winter, 1995), pp. 63-90, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/482934

Lecture 4: The Economic Costs and Benefits of Warfare, and the dynamism of the European

Competitive State System.

Violence seems key to the competition between military-fiscal states engaged in almost unrelenting

bouts of warfare across long periods of Western History. Does this seeming destructive enterprise

actually account for the pace of European technological growth, as spin-offs from military technology

follow and the cost of financing war puts ever greater strains on states while rewarding those whose

institutional and financial mechanisms can best face the challenge? The shift between technologies

of war that favour the offensive and the defensive is characteristic of global as well as European

conflict up to our own age. Did the level of technology continuously redefine the optimal size of the

competitive military-fiscal state?

Seminar 5: Cultural Embeddedness and Rationality Assumptions.

How rational and economically minded are human beings as actors? Has this changed over time?

Do economists overestimate human rationality and overlook the importance of religion, cosmology,

culture, and the pursuit of fame, power and artistic achievements for their own sake? If cultures

matter and economic activity can be said to be ‘culturally embedded’ then how significant are

differences between cultures in promoting, constraining and shaping the nature of their economic

development and charting the path-dependent trajectories of societies, their institutions and their

technologies (including information and communication technologies like written systems which can

shape the way we think)?

Reading:

Page 7: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

7 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

David Dequech,’ Cognitive and Cultural Embeddedness: Combining Institutional Economics and

Economic Sociology’, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 37, No. 2 (Jun., 2003), pp. 461-470, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/4227910

James R. Wible, ‘Towards a Process Conception of Rationality in Economics and Science’, Review of

Social Economy, Vol. 63, No. 3, The Best of the "Review of Social Economy":1944-1999 (Sept., 2005),

pp. 465-481, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/29770332

Further Reading:

If accessible please see Deepak Lal’s (1998) Unintended Consequences: The Impact of Factor

Endowments, Culture and Politics on Long Run Economic Performance.

Lecture 5: Technology and Science: the 'Blue Banana'.

We shall explore the shifting locus of technological leadership from Renaissance Italy to Industrial

Britain. Plotted on a map, populations, economic activity and scientific leadership appear to follow a

line across Europe which has been characterised as the 'blue banana'. Cultural, artistic and other

creative energies seem to go in tandem with economic cutting edge technology – how do we explain

efflorescences of creativity and dynamism? Was competition once again key? What about

commercialization and trade?

Seminar 6: Warfare and Early Modern State Building.

What were the benefits of violence? What were the drawbacks of organized violence? How much

damage did warfare cause in terms of lives, goods and effects on economic activity? Are states

merely some kind of protection racket that attempt to hold the monopoly of violence? We will

evaluate Parker's concept of the Military Revolution and explore the relationship between war and

the rise of European states. Did warfare accelerate the development of technology (through spin-offs

from military technology) and revenue raising capabilites for European states? What is the validity of

the economists' concept of creative destruction and can it be applied to warfare? In the long term

does armed conflict increase or decrease economic growth?

Reading:

Frederic Lane, ‘Economic Consequences of Organized Violence’, The Journal of Economic History,

Vol. XVIII, No. 4 (Dec., 1958), pp. 401-417, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2114533

Richard Bean, ‘War and the Birth of the Nation State’, The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 33, No.

1, The Tasks of Economic History (Mar., 1973), pp. 203-221, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117151

Further Reading:

Page 8: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

8 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Melissa Meriam Bullard, S. R. Epstein, Benjamin G. Kohl and Susan Mosher Stuard, ‘Where History

and Theory Interact: Frederic C. Lane on the Emergence of Capitalism’, Speculum , Vol. 79, No. 1

(Jan., 2004), pp. 88-119, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/20462795

Edgar Kiser and April Linton, ‘Determinants of the Growth of the State: War and Taxation in Early

Modern France and England’, Social Forces, Vol. 80, No. 2 (Dec., 2001), pp. 411-448, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2675585

If accessible Geoffrey Parker’s (1996) The Military Revolution: Military Innovation and the Rise of the

West, 1500-1800 and (2004) The Army of Flanders and the Spanish Road, 1567-1659: The Logistics of

Spanish Victory and Defeat in the Low Countries' Wars.

Lecture 6: Industrialisation, Sources of Energy and Ecology.

How important were energy deposits and sources to the massive increase in productivity through

industrialisation? Does the location of coal, peat, forests, waterways and other geographic factors

help to account for the timing and place of early industrialisation? Why did the Dutch golden age

peter out? We will explore the ideas of subterranean forests and the transition from an organic

economy.

Seminar 7: the Epstein Debate, Science vs. Technology?

How important was the scientific revolution for changes in the European economy? How important

was tacit and experiential knowledge communicated directly by craft workers from one to another

for the development of technology? Which was more important for generating Schumpeterian

growth? And are the two really at odds anyway? If Epstein is right that early industrial growth was

solely responsible for the technological improvements that drove economic growth can we still argue

that a culture and a climate that reflected Europe’s interest in science was a vital part of the context

for European economic takeoff in the long run?

Reading:

Stephan R. Epstein, ‘Property Rights to Technical Knowledge in Premodern Europe, 1300-1800’, The

American Economic Review , Vol. 94, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the One Hundred Sixteenth

Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association San Diego, CA, January 3-5, 2004 (May,

2004), pp. 382-387, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3592915

Joel Mokyr, ‘Technological Inertia in Economic History’, The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 52, No.

2 (Jun., 1992), pp. 325-338, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2123111

John D. Sterman and Jason Wittenberg, ‘Path Dependence, Competition, and Succession in the

Dynamics of Scientific Revolution’, Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 3, Special Issue: Application of

Complexity Theory to Organization Science (May - Jun., 1999), pp. 322-341, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2640334

Page 9: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

9 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Further Reading:

Joel Mokyr, ‘Punctuated Equilibria and Technological Progress’, The American Economic Review, Vol.

80, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the Hundred and Second Annual Meeting of the American

Economic Association (May, 1990), pp. 350-354, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2006599

Stephan R. Epstein, ‘Craft Guilds, Apprenticeship, and Technological Change in Preindustrial Europe’,

The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 58, No. 3 (Sep., 1998), pp. 684-713, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2566620

Francisco J. Ayala, ‘Darwin's Greatest Discovery: Design without Designer’, Proceedings of the

National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 104, In the Light of Evolution I:

Adaptation and Complex Design (May 15, 2007), pp. 8567-8573, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/25427713

If accessible please see Joel Mokyr’s (1990): The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and

Economic Progress.

Lecture 7: The Industrial Revolution, the Game Changing Event in Global Economic History.

The Industrial Revolution is a term that has aroused much debate, because it is suggestive of sudden

and dramatic change. As it happens the Industrial Revolution was a long drawn out process, but that

does not overturn the revolutionary nature of the changes it caused. Resource scarcity, access to

transport by sea and river, the demand for energy from a rapidly commercializing society with global

maritime trading links and colonial possessions which increased commodification of articles of mass

consumption, an agricultural revolution and demographic growth – all of these factors are impossible

to ignore in the technological story of how the power and potential of coal was harnessed through

the steam engine (invented to drain the coal mines of water), and how Britain became the most

productive cotton textile producer in the world. The first country to industrialise would inevitably

have a different experience than those who followed, but was it simply a story of England first and

then diffusing the example and the technology so that others could follow?

Seminar 8: Early Modern Mercantilism and Empires of Trade

What is mercantilism? Who practised it and in what ways? The Chinese imported precious metals

and exported commodities. Europeans had limited precious metals and a taste for spices and other

commodities. The Islamic world was the intermediary for obtaining these goods prior to Portuguese

exploration which lead the way to Asia. What was the significance of long distance trade? How

important was the rise of European trading empires to global economic history? Did the Spanish

achieve their purported monopoly in trade with their colonies in the Americas? Did the British

attempt to regulate and tax trade with the 13 colonies in North America cause them to lose their first

mercantilist empire? Did the British deindustrialise India? What economic changes and continuities

existed with the rule of the Mughals? What was the impact on British-Indian legal and political

institutions on the economy? How did the restructuring of land tenure and the Permanent Settlement

Page 10: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

10 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

of Bengal (1793) affect the rural economy? How do we account for the decline in Indian

manufacturing – was this an example of imperial mercantilism where the colony was forced to

produce raw materials and purchase British value added manufactures?

Reading:

Steve Pincus, ‘Rethinking Mercantilism: Political Economy, the British Empire, and the Atlantic World

in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries’, The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 1

(January 2012), pp. 3-34, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5309/willmaryquar.69.1.0003

Robert S. Smith, ‘Spanish Mercantilism: A Hardy Perennial’, Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 38, No.

1 (Jul., 1971), pp. 1-11, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1056063

Douglas A. Irwin, ‘Mercantilism as Strategic Trade Policy: The Anglo-Dutch Rivalry for the East India

Trade’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 99, No. 6 (Dec., 1991), pp. 1296-1314, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937731

Further Reading:

Curtis P. Nettels, ‘British Mercantilism and the Economic Development of the Thirteen Colonies’, The

Journal of Economic History, Vol. 12, No. 2 (Spring, 1952), pp. 105-114, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2113218

Susan D. Amussen, ‘Political Economy and Imperial Practice’, The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol.

69, No. 1 (January 2012), pp. 47-50, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5309/willmaryquar.69.1.0047

D. C. Coleman, ‘Mercantilism Revisited’, The Historical Journal, Vol. 23, No. 4 (Dec., 1980), pp. 773-

791, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2638725

Cathy Matson, ‘Imperial Political Economy: An Ideological Debate and Shifting Practices’, The William

and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 69, No. 1 (January 2012), pp. 35-40, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5309/willmaryquar.69.1.0035

Lecture 8: The Chinese Dynastic Cycle: Cosmology, Technology and the High Level Equilibrium

Trap?

We will begin with a short account of Chinese technological efflorescence during the Song dynasty –

was this a period when owing to a competitive state dynamic China was more vibrant? Successive

Chinese dynasties can be seen as following a pattern of rise, golden age, decline and fall, understood

through the doctrine of the 'mandate of heaven' – is this a valid framework for understanding pre-

modern China? What were the cosmologies, religions and philosophies of China and do they help us

to understand the patterns of long run Chinese history? Does China's political system account for the

successes of Zheng He's voyages and the reversal and abandonment of the outward looking

diplomatic and trading policy these voyages represented? Moving onto China’s economy – was

China subject to a high level equilibrium trap? This could be characterised as a blissful sleep of plenty

for a country that could largely meet its food needs and focussed on political contentment and safety

Page 11: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

11 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

for its subjects. Why did it fall into complacency and see its share of world trade and proportion of

global GDP fall so dramatically? Why the great expenditure on the Great Wall and the imperial

adventures in Central Asia and what were the effects of these? We also return to the Needham

question, why didn't science advance further in China with such a high base to begin from?

Seminar 9: The Low Countries and the Limits of the Organic Economy

Were early modern economies constrained by agricultural productivity and a zero sum game in

sources of energy? How important were energy deposits and sources to the massive increase in

productivity through industrialisation? Does the location of coal, peat, forests, waterways and other

geographic factors help to account for the timing and place of early industrialisation? Why did the

Dutch golden age peter out? We will explore the ideas of subterranean forests and the transition

from an organic economy.

Reading:

Chapter 1, E. A. Wrigley’s (2004) Poverty, Progress and Population.

Jan de Vries, ‘The Role of the Rural Sector in the Development of the Dutch Economy: 1500- 1700’,

The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 31, No. 1, The Tasks of Economic History (Mar., 1971), pp. 266-

268, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117037

Jan de Vries, ‘The Industrial Revolution and the Industrious Revolution’, The Journal of Economic

History, Vol. 54, No. 2, Papers Presented at the Fifty-ThirdAnnual Meeting of the Economic History

Association (Jun., 1994), pp. 249-270, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2123912

Further Reading:

Joel Mokyr, ‘Industrial Growth and Stagnation in the Low Countries, 1800-1850’, The Journal of

Economic History , Vol. 36, No. 1, The Tasks of Economic History (Mar., 1976), pp. 276-278, available

at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2119820

E. A. Wrigley, ‘The Transition to an Advanced Organic Economy: Half a Millennium of English

Agriculture’, The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 59, No. 3 (Aug., 2006), pp. 435-480,

available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3805970

Lecture 9: Long Distance Trade, Mercantilism and Merchant Empires.

What is mercantilism? Who practised it and in what ways? The Chinese imported precious metals

and exported commodities. Europeans had limited precious metals and a taste for spices and other

commodities. The Islamic world was the intermediary for obtaining these goods prior to Portuguese

exploration which lead the way to Asia. What was the significance of long distance trade? How

important was the rise of European trading empires to global economic history?

Page 12: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

12 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Seminar 10: the Industrial Revolution, why England First?

One of the biggest questions in economic history – why did the industrial revolution happen? And

why did it happen when it did and where it did? What were the advantages and disadvantages of

being first? What was the significance and nature of the industrial revolution for global history? How

did subsequent industrialisation occur in other countries?

Reading:

Joel Mokyr,’ Why Was the Industrial Revolution a European Phenomenon?’, Supreme Court

Economic Review , Vol. 10, The Rule of Law, Freedom, and Prosperity (2003), pp. 27-63, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/1147137

Nico Voigtländer and Hans-Joachim Voth, ‘Why England? Demographic Factors, Structural Change

and Physical Capital Accumulation during the Industrial Revolution’, Journal of Economic Growth,

Vol. 11, No. 4 (Dec., 2006), pp. 319-361, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/40216109

Richard E. Baldwin, Philippe Martin and Gianmarco I. P. Ottaviano, ‘Global Income Divergence,

Trade, and Industrialization: The Geography of Growth Take-Offs’, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol.

6, No. 1 (Mar., 2001), pp. 5-37, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/40215903

N. F. R. Crafts, ‘Exogenous or Endogenous Growth? The Industrial Revolution Reconsidered’, The

Journal of Economic History, Vol. 55, No. 4 (Dec., 1995), pp. 745-772, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2123815

Further Reading:

Peter Temin, ‘Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution’, The Journal of Economic History, Vol.

57, No. 1 (Mar., 1997), pp. 63-82, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2951107

C. Knick Harley and N. F. R. Crafts, ‘Simulating the Two Views of the British Industrial Revolution’, The

Journal of Economic History, Vol. 60, No. 3 (Sep., 2000), pp. 819-841, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2566439

Nicholas Crafts, ‘Productivity Growth in the Industrial Revolution: A New Growth Accounting

Perspective’, The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 64, No. 2 (Jun., 2004), pp. 521-535, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3874783

Julian Hoppit, ‘Counting the Industrial Revolution’, The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 43,

No. 2 (May, 1990), pp. 173-193, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2596785

Joel Mokyr, ‘Intellectual Property Rights, the Industrial Revolution, and the Beginnings of Modern

Economic Growth’, The American Economic Review , Vol. 99, No. 2, Papers and Proceedings of the

One Hundred Twenty-First Meeting of the American Economic Association (May, 2009), pp. 349-355,

available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/25592423

Lecture 10: Spanish Conquest and Colonisation of the Americas, American Silver and the Manila

Trade.

Page 13: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

13 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

The search for Asia took the Spanish instead to the Americas, where they found precious metals and

created a system for conveying gold and silver back to Spain. The Spanish did not understand

inflation, seeing the value of gold and silver as fixed; their economy suffered from something akin to

Dutch disease while they spent their treasure on fighting wars within Europe. Then there was the

Manila trade with Asia via their colony, the Philippines. Spanish America became prey to pirates from

northwestern Europe, especially the English, who along with the Dutch and French acquired sugar

plantation colonies in the Americas oriented towards cash crops. What was the impact of the

'discovery' of the new world by the old? How did its integration into a new global economy impact on

economic change?

Seminar 11: Modern Empire and Gentlemanly Capitalism?

Cain and Hopkins’ theory of Gentlemanly Capitalism has aroused heated and prolonged debate. How

persuasive is their characterization of the nature of modern empire and British overseas expansion?

What distinguished different phases of European imperialism and colonisation? What objections can

we make to the theory of Gentlemanly Capitalism? And even if we accept the substance of their

arguments is the term appropriate?

Reading:

P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins, ‘Gentlemanly Capitalism and British Expansion Overseas I. The Old

Colonial System, 1688-1850’, The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 39, No. 4 (Nov., 1986),

pp. 501-525, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2596481

P. J. Cain and A. G. Hopkins, ‘Gentlemanly Capitalism and British Expansion Overseas II: New

Imperialism, 1850-1945’, The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 40, No. 1 (Feb., 1987), pp. 1-

26, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2596293

Lecture 11: British Settler Colonies and the Search for the Staple – From the 13 Colonies to

Australia.

Early European colonial endeavour looked for navigable rivers and entry points for trade and

focussed on a combination of subsistence farming and the quest for the staple crop (tobacco in

Virginia, sheep in Australia) which would be profitable enough for the colony to grow and prosper.

What were the nature of white settler colonies? What determined the success of those settlement

colonies that took off? How did they attract migrants from Britain and Europe? How did white

settlers interact with indigenous peoples? How did settlements develop from colonies to dominions

to self-governing democracies?

Seminar 12: The Imperialism of Free Trade?

Was imperialism primarily about trade? What kind of trade? Weren’t Europeans scraping the barrel

with their limited levels of trade with their African colonies for example? Can forcing open markets

Page 14: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

14 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

(as with the Opium War) be seen as free trade? What about informal empire and trade with

countries outside of the colonial relationship? If we accept that there was an imperialism of free

trade, how did it arise from systems of imperial mercantilism and trade with ‘imperial preference’?

Does it complicate the picture when we realise that some leading advocates of free trade were also

fierce critics of empire?

Reading:

John Gallagher and Ronald Robinson, ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade’, The Economic History Review,

New Series, Vol. 6, No. 1 (1953), pp. 1-15, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2591017

D. C. M. Platt, ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade: Some Reservations’, The Economic History Review,

New Series, Vol. 21, No. 2 (Aug., 1968), pp. 296-306, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2592437

Oliver MacDonagh, ‘The Anti-Imperialism of Free Trade’, The Economic History Review, New Series,

Vol. 14, No. 3 (1962), pp. 489-501, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2591889

Further Reading:

D. C. M. Platt, ‘Further Objections to an "Imperialism of Free Trade", 1830-60’, The Economic History

Review, New Series, Vol. 26, No. 1 (1973), pp. 77-91, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2594760

R. J. Moore, ‘Imperialism and 'Free Trade' Policy in India, 1853-4’, The Economic History Review, New

Series, Vol. 17, No. 1 (1964), pp. 135-145, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2592695

W. M. Mathew, ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade: Peru, 1820-70’, The Economic History Review, New

Series, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Dec., 1968), pp. 562-579, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2592751

Peter Harnetty, ‘The Imperialism of Free Trade: Lancashire and the Indian Cotton Duties, 1859-1862’,

The Economic History Review, New Series, Vol. 18, No. 2 (1965), pp. 333-349, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2592098

Lecture 12: European Imperial and Trading Expansion into Asia, the Commodification of Spices

and the Foundation of Dutch Slave Plantations in the Banda Islands.

Europeans in their Carribean colonies had pioneered a slave plantation model orientated towards the

export of cash crops such as sugar and tobacco. Following the Portuguese, the tiny Dutch Republic

became the largest maritime power in the world during the Dutch Golden Age, extending its trade

networks all the way to Japan (and maintaining a trading presence there throughout Japan’s later

isolation from the other western economies). How did the Dutch turn preciosities such as nutmeg

into commodities and ultimately articles of mass consumption? How did the Banda Islands come to

exemplify the slave plantation for spice production in Asia? And how did Dutch mercantilist

protection of their trade lead to wars and rivalry with interlopers such as the English?

Page 15: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

15 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Seminar 13: The Hobson-Lenin Thesis of Imperialism.

Two arch critics of empire, one of whom seems to have drawn rather heavily on the other (students

are reminded that Lenin ought to have cited Hobson). Students should read Hobson even if they take

the opportunity to read Lenin in Russian. What did Hobson and Lenin argue? What distinctions can

we find to distinguish between their arguments? And what are the implications of their ideas? Is one

that imperialism suppresses wages in the home country and that such inward investment might lead

to a virtuous upwards spiral of growth (as with Henry Ford’s five dollars and day, that allowed his

workers to become consumers and increase demand as they could afford saving schemes towards

buying one of the Model Ts that they helped to build)? What about the implications of the theory for

the colonized, are these as well thought out and developed?

Reading:

John A. Hobson (1902), Imperialism, A Study, available at

http://www.marxists.org/archive/hobson/1902/imperialism/index.htm

Vladimir Ilyich Lenin (1917), Imperialism, the Highest Stage of Capitalism, available at

www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/

Lecture 13: Mughal Vulnerability, the Rise of the East India Company (EIC) and the Raj; an

Economic and Military Transition.

Were the Mughals fundamentally an agrarian land-based empire? What was the Mughal

involvement in Indian Ocean and overseas trade? What capacity did the Mughal State have to

extract taxation from its subjects? How did the Mughal Empire's proportion of global GDP change

over time? Was the Mughal State in relative decline by the time the EIC obtained its bridgehead in

Bengal, and if so why and how? The EIC had followed in the footsteps of other joint-stock companies

such as the Dutch East India company (the VOC). So are joint-stock companies really simple entities,

was their creation a major institutional development that would revolutionise the global economy?

The EIC managed to out-compete its rivals in South Asia with the help of local Indian finance and key

defections to the Company's side during military conflict. Indians had adapted European military

technology from the first arrival of Europeans in South Asia and managed to create some superior

technologies (such as laminated guns). Did the EIC import the Military Revolution into South Asia?

Why did it turn out to be the most successful military-fiscal player in the conflict to control South

Asia? What economic changes and continuities existed with the rule of the Mughals? What was the

impact on British-Indian legal and political institutions on the economy? How did the restructuring of

land tenure and the Permanent Settlement of Bengal (1793) affect the rural economy? How do we

account for the decline in Indian manufacturing – was this an example of imperial mercantilism

where the colony was forced to produce raw materials and purchase British value added

manufactures? Did the British deindustrialise India? Did British rule provide any institutional or

economic benefits to India or was the Raj a purely extractive and exploitative enterprise?

Page 16: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

16 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Seminar 14: Douglass North and New Institutional Economics (NIE) or Telling Economists What

Historians Already Knew.

Douglass North’s theory won him the Nobel Prize. What questions does North and NIE raise? Do

states matter? Do institutions matter? How do they function in order to facilitate economic

transactions, enforce contracts and lower transaction costs? Historians have always discussed the

importance of political structures and legal systems and the exercise of violent compulsion by states.

Are Economists now willing to acknowledge their importance as vital contexts for efficient economic

activity? If economics has largely been captured by mathematical models, is there room for

subjective concepts that cannot easily fit into a formula and if there isn’t aren’t economists the

poorer for it?

Reading:

Douglass C. North, ‘Institutions’, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, No. 1 (Winter, 1991),

pp. 97-112, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1942704

Douglass C. North, ‘Government and the Cost of Exchange in History’, The Journal of Economic

History, Vol. 44, No. 2, The Tasks of Economic History (Jun., 1984), pp. 255-264, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2120702

Further Reading:

Douglass C. North, ‘Economic Performance Through Time’, The American Economic Review, Vol. 84,

No. 3 (Jun., 1994), pp. 359-368, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118057

Douglass C. North, ‘What Do We Mean by Rationality?’, Public Choice, Vol. 77, No. 1, The Next

Twenty-Five Years of Public Choice (Sep.,1993), pp. 159-162, http://www.jstor.org/stable/30027216

Lecture 14: the Ming Dynasty (1368–1644), its Rise and its Fall as a Measure of the Chinese

Dynastic Cycle and the Emerging Global Economy.

The Ming colonisation of Southern China may have proved (in the long run) to be one of the most

significant events in global history, converting a subtropical and thinly settled region into the centre

of an export orientated silk producing economy. The Ming used imports of Spanish American silver

via the Manila trade to more extensively monetize their economy and their taxation system. But

when the silver supply contracted and the world was faced with climate induced famines from China

to Spain the Ming state found it increasingly difficult to face of the Manchu military threat on their

northern borders and to collect taxes in silver from a distressed peasantry. The Ming empire

descended into banditry and chaos and the three pronged threat brought the dynasty to an end,

revealing the dangers of relying on integrated global trade networks and of an overly rigid monetary

and taxation system.

Seminar 15: Wallerstein and World Systems Theory, or ‘Neo-Smithian Marxism’.

Page 17: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

17 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Brenner dubbed World Systems Theory 'Neo-Smithian Marxism', is this a fair characterisation? What

is World Systems Theory? Is it an accurate depiction of the changing global economy or of economic

processes? Amongst the various critics of global capitalism why has it proved a popular framework

for writing global history? Is the theory hampered by a sense that the global economy is an

exploitative ‘zero sum game’? Does the Smithian and Ricardian understanding of relative

‘comparative advantage’ in trade help to discredit this idea? How does it account for the emergence

of new cores within the world system without the absolute descent of other parts of the system? Is it

not the case that overall, for the most part, real nominal GDP has been rising globally, and that the

system does not necessitate the absolute immiseration of one part of the globe’s population in order

to enable the enrichment of another? When it comes to real improvements in living standards or

lack thereof shouldn’t we be listening to Malthus rather than Wallerstein?

Reading:

Immanuel Wallerstein, ‘After Developmentalism and Globalization, What?’, Social Forces, Vol. 83,

No. 3 (Mar., 2005), pp. 1263-1278, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3598277

Daniel Garst, ‘Wallerstein and His Critics’, Theory and Society, Vol. 14, No. 4 (Jul., 1985), pp. 469-495,

available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/657223

Further Reading:

Robert A. Denemark and Kenneth P. Thomas, ‘The Brenner-Wallerstein Debate’, International

Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 1 (Mar., 1988), pp. 47-65, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600412

If accessible see Immanuel Wallerstein’s (2011, 3rd edn.) Historical Capitalism with Capitalist

Civilization.

Lecture 15: China: the Opium War, the Taiping TianGuo, and the Era of Unequal Treaties.

As China under the Qing continued to demand the importation of silver and gold bullion in exchange

for their valuable and sought after trade goods (especially silk, porcelain and tea) British traders

struggled to meet the demands of European markets without sufficient bullion. Using the Bengal

bridgehead they began to produce Opium to sell to the Chinese market in violation of Chinese

imperial regulations. Ultimately the vast trade in illegal drugs sparked a conflict in which British

naval supremacy would force China into humiliating concessions (including ceding the island of Hong

Kong) and open the way for more unequal treaties between Western powers that allowed their

citizens access to the Chinese market and gave them immunity from Chinese laws.

Seminar 16: King Cotton and the Slave Plantation Economy of the American South.

In the mid Nineteenth Century the issue of the expansion of slavery into the territories being acquired

by the rapidly expanding U.S. empire is coming to a head. America is split between an increasingly

backward agricultural slave plantation economic system in the South (whose profitability had been

Page 18: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

18 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

restored by the invention of the Cotton Gin in 1793) and an increasingly prosperous and industrial

North. A bloody conflict foreshadows the modern carnage of the First World War. We will look at

figures on the relative economies and production capacity of the two sides which show that much like

the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbour, the South's bid for independence was a reckless gamble if

material and economic factors are seen to be decisive in the outcome of conflicts. But the Southern

Plantation Economy was vibrant and profitable, its cotton production was export market orientated

and slaves as a human commodity were worth more than any other single financial asset in the

United States other than the entirety of the land itself. Was the conflict between the rival economic

systems inevitable? Had war been averted or the Sotuh achieved its independence could the slave

based economic system have modernized further and survived into the 20th Century?

Reading:

Heywood Fleisig, ‘Slavery, the Supply of Agricultural Labor, and the Industrialization of the South’,

The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Sep., 1976), pp. 572-597, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118846

Viken Tchakerian, ‘Productivity, Extent of Markets, and Manufacturing in the Late Antebellum South

and Midwest’, The Journal of Economic History, Vol. 54, No. 3 (Sep., 1994), pp. 497-525,

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2123866

Further Reading:

Robert S. Starobin, ‘The Economics of Industrial Slavery in the Old South’, The Business History

Review, Vol. 44, No. 2 (Summer, 1970), pp. 131-174, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3112351

Lecture 16: Slave trading, Western Expansion, Railroad Building and the Economic Divergence of

the American North and South.

After the Spanish came the English, Dutch and French. The triangular slave trade between Europe,

Africa and the Americas was a massive undertaking and profitable economic concern laying the

groundwork for a slave plantation system in the Americas producing commodities like sugar, cotton

and tobacco. How was slavery and the plantation system related to Europe's economic rise and later

industrialisation? Slavery gained its strongest foothold in the American South, and with invention of

the Cotton Gin became increasingly profitable. We will explore the slave economy and the

profitability of the interstate slave trade as the Southern states of the Atlantic seaboard and the

Upper South colonized the South West with ever larger slave plantations. This contrasted with the

reforms and railroad driven expansion of cities like Chicago in the North with their free-labour

factories. Were the two systems destined to compete and ultimately clash?

Seminar 17: The Gold Standard and the Role of Central Banks.

In the early 20th Century leading economies left the gold standard, and the role of central banks was

hotly debated. Bretton Woods rebuilt the international economic system in 1944 on the basis of the

Page 19: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

19 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

gold standard, setting up institutions like the IMF. In 1971 a Republican President Nixon abandoned

the gold standard. Now all major currencies are fiat currencies (something which had also existed in

several Chinese dynasties). Weimar Germany points to the dangers of hyperinflation experienced

when a fiat currency is printed too freely. Massive indebtedness in the advanced western economies

(resulting from overspending by states and an imbalance in world trade) to emerging creditor

countries like China has prompted arguments over currency. The Chinese currency is not freely

convertible and is kept artificially low say American policy-makers and politicians, causing unfair

terms of trade. China and Russia have suggested freeing the world economy from the dominance of

the dollar through the creation of some kind of international currency or basket of currencies based

on IMF drawing rights. Russia has called for a return to the gold standard. The Euro crisis has

imperilled one major alternative currency which could be included in any basket. The gold price has

risen throughout recent crises. What is the meaning and significance, past and present, of the gold

standard?

Reading:

Angela Redish, ‘The Evolution of the Gold Standard in England’, The Journal of Economic History, Vol.

50, No. 4 (Dec., 1990), pp. 789-805, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2122455

Ian M. Drummond, ‘The Russian Gold Standard, 1897-1914’, The Journal of Economic History, Vol.

36, No. 3 (Sep., 1976), pp. 663-688, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118850

Further Reading:

Lawrence H. Officer, ‘The Efficiency of the Dollar-Sterling Gold Standard, 1890-1908’, Journal of

Political Economy, Vol. 94, No. 5 (Oct., 1986), pp. 1038-1073, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/1833191

Giulio M. Gallarotti, ‘Hegemons of a Lesser God: The Bank of France and Monetary Leadership under

the Classical Gold Standard’, Review of International Political Economy, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Oct., 2005),

pp. 624-646, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/25124041

Lecture 17: The American Civil War, Reconstruction and the Rise of Jim Crown Segregation.

A totemic conflict which saw the invention of iron clad ships, revolutionizing naval technology and

warefare, and which pointed towards the carnage of the First World War to come. We look at the

economic as well as military capacities of each side to fight a war in which ultimately the more

economically powerful side would triumph. Attempts at radical reconstruction of the racial and

economic order in the South proved short-lived however, and the South remained economically

agricultural and relatively ‘backward’ while reintroducing a discriminatory regime against Southern

blacks in place of the slave system that had been abolished as a result of the Civil War.

Seminar 18: The Wall Street Crash, the Great Depression and the New Deal.

Page 20: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

20 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

American capitalism was at its most brash and confident in the 1920s. The mechanical production

line was catapulting American industry to new levels of efficiency and leaving the likes of Britain

behind. Ford's Model T car began production in 1908 and ended in 1927 having sold more than

fifteen million cars. The demands of assembly line production created a high turn over of employees,

but Ford did not slow down production, instead in 1914 Ford offered employees the unheard of wage

of five dollars a day. It foreshadowed a virtuous cycle in American capitalism whereby the wages of

industrial workers would rise to create mass demand for products that they themselves were

manufacturing. (It is interesting to look back at Hobson's argument from Seminar 16 in this light.)

However, stock markets were still in their infancy and the Wall Street Crash of 1929 brought all this

dynamism to a halt. We will examine the nature and impact of the Great Depression and explore the

contemporary economic arguments as to how to tackle it. Did Keynes offer the right solution to this

crisis of capitalism? How successful were New Deal policies? Was it really the demands of total war

that completed the recovery?

Reading:

Barry Eichengreen and Peter Temin, ‘The Gold Standard and the Great Depression’, Contemporary

European History, Vol. 9, No. 2 (Jul., 2000), pp. 183-207, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/20081742

Christina D. Romer, ‘The Great Crash and the Onset of the Great Depression’, The Quarterly Journal

of Economics, Vol. 105, No. 3 (Aug., 1990), pp. 597-624, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937892

Price V. Fishback, William C. Horrace and Shawn Kantor, ‘Did New Deal Grant Programs Stimulate

Local Economies? A Study of Federal Grants and Retail Sales during the Great Depression’, The

Journal of Economic History, Vol. 65, No. 1 (Mar., 2005), pp. 36-71, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3875042

Further Reading:

Jim F. Couch, Keith E. Atkinson and William H. Wells, ‘New Deal Agricultural Appropriations: A

Political Influence’, Eastern Economic Journal, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Spring, 1998), pp. 137-148, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/40325833

Jeff Manza, ‘Political Sociological Models of the U.S. New Deal’, Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 26

(2000), pp. 297-322, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/223446

Julian E. Zelizer, ‘The Forgotten Legacy of the New Deal: Fiscal Conservatism and the Roosevelt

Administration, 1933-1938’, Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Jun., 2000), pp. 331-358,

available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/27552097

M. Stephen Weatherford and Boris Sergeyev, ‘Thinking about Economic Interests: Class and

Recession in the New Deal’, Political Behavior, Vol. 22, No. 4 (Dec., 2000), pp. 311-339, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/1520055

Page 21: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

21 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

Lecture 18: The Age of Confidence, World Trades Fares, Technological Breakthroughs, the

Emergence of Modern Japan and the Shock of the First World War.

The late 19th and early 20th Century was a largely laissez faire era of confidence in man’s capacity to

overcome the limitations of nature through enterprising and pioneering technology. This brash

confidence was characterized by the many Great Exhibitions and World’s Fairs held in Britain,

America and France which suggested how nations might peacefully compete to create a bright future

(made brighter by electric lights and cinema and a myriad of other useful inventions). Having been

forcibly opened to foreign trade by Commodore Perry of the US Navy Japan also saw record growth

in this period, Westernising, modernising and industrialising to the extent that it was able to defeat

Russia in 1904-1905, placing it in a position to exploit its weaker neighbour China who had failed to

adapt as well to global challenges and the threats of western imperialism.

Seminar 19: The Keynes Hayek Debate.

Did the demands of the wartime planned economy geared towards total war create a Keynesian

economy? What about the alternative answers given by the Austrian School of economists? Could it

be said that Hayekian approach provides more answers as to the causes of booms and bubbles while

the Keynesian provides the policy solutions for the bust? Keynes ideas can be read strictly as

advocating countercyclical intervention to boost aggregate demand through state spending in times

of economic downturn. However policymakers have often ignored the other side to his arguments –

that the state should contract during economic booms and repay the debts incurred by deficit

spending during the downturn and save funds for a future crisis – is implementing a truly Keynesian

countercyclical approach a problem for democracies? Keynsians have also taken his advocacy of

more central state planning as a license to create a larger state and a mixed economy leading

Government’s to take control of what Lenin referred to as the ‘commanding heights’ of the economy.

Keynesians have also found that stagflation confounds their theories, so do Keynesian solutions fit

every economic downturn? Are they as useful for us today as they were in the 1930s? After the

relatively laissez faire environment of the early 20th Century and the Keynesian consensus of the mid-

century, Hayek’s ideas (suspicious of macroeconomics, state intervention in the economy and central

planning) gained ground towards the end of the Century as states began to retreat from the

commanding heights of the economy. But after the financial crisis of the new Century are we once

again ‘all Keynesians now’? There is an even a case to be made that deregulationist free marketeers

like Ronald Reagan also embraced Keynesian orthodoxies in their bids to boost the economy (and

aggregate demand) through deficit-spending tax cutting (rather than deficit-spending on increasing

the state) – are we persuaded?

Reading:

F. A. von Hayek, ‘Reflections on the Pure Theory of Money of Mr. J. M. Keynes’, Economica, No. 33

(Aug., 1931), pp. 270-295, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2548035

J. M. Keynes, ‘The Pure Theory of Money. A Reply to Dr. Hayek’, Economica, No. 34 (Nov., 1931), pp.

387-397, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2549192

Page 22: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

22 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

F. A. von Hayek, ‘A Rejoinder to Mr. Keynes’, Economica, No. 34 (Nov., 1931), pp. 398-403, available

at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2549193

F. A. von Hayek, ‘Reflections on the Pure Theory of Money of Mr. J. M. Keynes (continued)’,

Economica, No. 35 (Feb., 1932), pp. 22-44, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2548974

Further Reading:

J. M. Keynes, ‘The General Theory of Employment’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 51, No.

2 (Feb., 1937), pp. 209-223, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1882087

J. M. Keynes, ‘Note by Lord Keynes ‘,The Economic Journal, Vol. 54, No. 215/216 (Dec., 1944), pp.

429-430, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2226439

Lecture 19: The Moving Assembly Line, Henry Ford and the Model T, and the Wall Street Crash.

American capitalism was at its most brash and confident in the 1920s. The mechanical production

line was catapulting American industry to new levels of efficiency and leaving the likes of Britain

behind. Ford's Model T car began production in 1908 and ended in 1927 having sold more than

fifteen million cars. The demands of assembly line production created a high turn over of employees,

but Ford did not slow down production, instead in 1914 Ford offered employees the unheard of wage

of five dollars a day. It foreshadowed a virtuous cycle in American capitalism whereby the wages of

industrial workers would rise to create mass demand for products that they themselves were

manufacturing. (It is interesting to look back at Hobson's argument from Seminar 16 in this light.)

However, stock markets were still in their infancy and the Wall Street Crash of 1929 brought all this

dynamism to a halt.

Seminar 20: Hyperinflation in interwar Germany.

Understanding and controlling inflation is a major concern for Central Banks. Fears of deflation and

hyperinflation put strict limits on the options they feel are available to them, and most have aimed at

stable and low levels of inflation. However recent rounds of quantities easing (QE or money printing)

have led to discussion of competitive devaluation and currency wars and of the costs (often unseen)

that inflation inflicts on working people and people’s savings and investments, and also to the

medium and long term risks of higher inflation. It is instructive to discuss the money printing and

hyperinflation that crippled Germany’s interwar economy and provided fertile ground for the rise of

the Nazi party, especially as some governments today (like Zimbabwe) seem yet to have learned the

lessons of hyperinflation. Some economists have suggested that though low inflation is usually

associated with growth, like a drug, you need to keep increasing the dosage to get the same benefits

over the long run, and ultimately inflicting intentional pain on the economy to restore sound currency

and low levels of inflation will be necessary. What is inflation, can it be controlled in the global

economy and if so how? What are the dangers of letting inflation get out of hand?

Reading:

Page 23: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

23 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

P. Michael, A. R. Nobay and D. A. Peel, ‘The German Hyperinflation and the Demand for Money

Revisited’, International Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 1 (Feb., 1994), pp. 1-22, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2527088

David E. Laidler and George W. Stadler, ‘Monetary Explanations of the Weimar Republic's

Hyperinflation: Some Neglected Contributions in Contemporary German Literature’, Journal of

Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 30, No. 4 (Nov., 1998), pp. 816-831, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601130

Alessandra Casella and Jonathan S. Feinstein, ‘Economic Exchange During Hyperinflation’, Journal of

Political Economy, Vol. 98, No. 1 (Feb., 1990), pp. 1-27, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937639

Further Reading:

Rodney L. Jacobs, ‘Hyperinflation and the Supply of Money’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking,

Vol. 9, No. 2 (May, 1977), pp. 287-303, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/1991979

Paul Evans, ‘Time-Series Analysis of the German Hyperinflation’, International Economic Review, Vol.

19, No. 1 (Feb., 1978), pp. 195-209, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/2526404

Lawrence J. Christiano, ‘Cagan's Model of Hyperinflation under Rational Expectations’, International

Economic Review, Vol. 28, No. 1 (Feb., 1987), pp. 33-49, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/2526858

Lecture 20: The Great Depression, the New Deal, Rearmament and War-induced Recovery.

We will examine the nature and impact of the Great Depression and explore the contemporary

economic arguments as to how to tackle it. Did Keynes offer the right solution to this crisis of

capitalism? How successful were New Deal policies? Was it really the demands of total war that

completed the recovery? And did the demands of total war create a Keynesian economy? Is

Keynesianism as useful for us today (when it advocates countercyclical government spending which

seems impossibly at variance with democratic pressures and with advanced bond markets that

punish governments for overspending in an economic downturn)? What about the alternative

answers given by the Austrian School of economists?

Seminar 21: West Germany, Erhard and the Wirtschaftswunder.

In the postwar years West German politician Ludwig Erhard (first as Minister of Economics then as

Chancellor) played a key role in creating the environment for Germany’s economic miracle. Like

France and Britain, West Germany benefited greatly from the Marshall Plan, but Erhard defied advice

and the policies of the allied military occupiers to unilaterally end wage and price controls (a policy

that would continue to be deployed in the United States as late as the Nixon administration). Faced

with four occupation currencies (in the Soviet, American, British and French occupation zones) Erhard

was also responsible for introducing the Deutsch Mark to prevent a return of hyperinflation. The

Page 24: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

24 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

move angered the Soviet authorities (who had not been consulted) as the old Reichsmarks which the

Deutsch Mark replaced flooded into East Germany causing inflation forcing them to introduce their

own Deutsch Marks (colloquially known as the Ostmark). The Soviet Ostmark was officially

maintained to be worth the same as the West German Deutsch Mark, but due to continued inflation

its relative value against the rival currency plummeted making it difficult for East Germans to use

their money in the Western sectors before the erection of the Berlin Wall. Both of Erhards policies

helped to establish a sound basis for West German economic recovery helping to put an end to a

rampant black market barter economy in which cigarettes functioned as the effective currency for

small transactions and Cognac for larger transactions (with all the attendant transaction costs such a

system entails). East and West Germany came to symbolize the divergence in economic systems and

fortunes that would characterize the Cold War. West German success was greater than the other

Western economies – was this due to policies that were more free market than even those of the

United States? In any event the German economic miracle was part of a wider boom in Western

economies, a period of almost interrupted growth that was to last for 30 years until the first of the oil

shocks of the 1970s.

Reading:

Ludwig Erhard, ‘Germany's Economic Goals’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 4 (Jul., 1958), pp. 611-617,

available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/20029315

Ludwig Erhard, ‘The Free Market Economy Works’, Challenge, Vol. 6, No. 8 (May 1958), pp. 40-45,

available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/40717665

D. F., ‘The Literal Ludwig Erhard’, Challenge, Vol. 6, No. 2 (Nov., 1957), pp. 27-28, available at

http://www.jstor.org/stable/40717935

Further Reading:

Steven Tolliday, ‘Enterprise and State in the West German Wirtschaftswunder: Volkswagen and the

Automobile Industry, 1939-1962’, The Business History Review, Vol. 69, No. 3 (Autumn, 1995), pp.

273-350, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/3117336

Robert Spencer, ‘Germany in the "Erhard Era"’, International Journal, Vol. 19, No. 4 (Autumn, 1964),

pp. 458-473, available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/40199060

Lecture 21: The Keynes Hayek Debate, Political Context and Consequences.

Keynes was a policy-orientated academic who frequently worked with government. Keynes was

appointed financial representative for the British Treasury at the 1919 Versailles peace conference,

an experience crucial to shaping his outlook. Keynes prophetic warnings to government at the time

(repeated in his 1919 The Economic Consequences of the Peace) that a policy of punishing Germany

would be economically unsustainable and would lead to dire consequences were ignored as the

Treaty of Versailles imposed punitive reparations payments on defeated Germany, which would lead

to money printing, hyperinflation and conditions that proved fertile for the rise of the Nazi party.

Hayek’s views were shaped by a wariness of the threat of totalitarian government for destroying the

Page 25: Modern and Postmodern Economic History and Postmodern... · Modern and Postmodern Economic History Course Description This course covers episodes from Global economic history over

25 Copyright © 2013 Uther Charlton-Stevens

freedom of the individual, which explains his attack on central planning as The Road to Serfdom

(1944), and his subsequent distress that through much of his life Keynes seemed to have triumphed –

not merely in the views he had actually put forth, but in the wide interpretation of Keynesianism by

policymakers as a license to take over heavy industries and place government at the commanding

heights of a mixed economy. Where the political consequences of these two figures distinct from the

substance of their economic ideas?

Lecture 22: Marshall Plan Aid, Post-war Recovery, and the 30 Year Boom.

After the war Western Europe faced widespread physical destruction, depopulation, and serious food

shortages. Rationing became worse in Britain and was extended to bread as American lend-lease

wartime aid was replaced with demands for repayment and as Britain shipped food to Germany to

head off starvation there. In response to the American perception (fostered by Winston Churchill’s

warnings about an ‘Iron Curtain’) that this was fertile ground for the spread of communism American

Marshall Aid money, agricultural and industrial equipment poured into the reconstruction of Western

Europe. Some European countries continued wartime central planning of industry, increasing

nationalisations and beginning the construction of welfare states. West Germany adopted the most

free market approach and enjoyed the most significant industrial growth (exemplified by the success

of Volkswagen Type 1 or ‘Beetle’ ). In their first major covert overseas action the recently formed CIA

helped the Christian Democrats to defeat the Communist in Italy. Italian incomes continued to lag

behind the likes of the US, Britain and West Germany, but they too participated in a miraculous 30

year boom of growth, whose pattern seemed to follow the virtuous cycle of Fordism in the pre-

Depression U.S. , as workers became consumers leading to ever more production and employment.

Italian car company Fiat like other European automakers travelled to America to learn from Ford, but

Italian success was symbolized by the ubiquitous Vespa motorcycle. It was not until the oil shocks of

the early 1970s that this continuous boom for Western economies finally came to an end.