mobilgard 560 vs - cepsaman low sulphur field trial results • 12k98 me engine • tested at oem...

22
Note: For Planning Purposes only. Nothing contained herein is intended to override the corporate separateness of affiliated companies. Final designs for organizational structures, processes, and accountabilities are subject to appropriate management approvals, observance of corporate separateness principles and other requirements of applicable laws, and appropriate contractual arrangements. All competitive data/ information contained herein was obtained, or extrapolated from, publicly available sources, customer feedback and internally generated observations, interpreted as appropriate. The information contained in this presentation is confidential and may not be copied, reproduced or disclosed in any manner whatsoever by the recipient without the prior written consent of ExxonMobil. Mobilgard 560 VS The engineered advantage Presenter August 2012

Upload: others

Post on 29-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

Note: For Planning Purposes only. Nothing contained herein is intended to override the corporate separateness of affiliated companies. Final designs for organizational structures, processes, and accountabilities are subject to appropriate management approvals, observance of corporate separateness principles and other requirements of applicable laws, and appropriate contractual arrangements. All competitive data/ information contained herein was obtained, or extrapolated from, publicly available sources, customer feedback and internally generated observations, interpreted as appropriate. The information contained in this presentation is confidential and may not be copied, reproduced or disclosed in any manner whatsoever by the recipient without the prior written consent of ExxonMobil.

Mobilgard™ 560 VS

The engineered advantage™

PresenterAugust 2012

Page 2: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

2

Agenda

• Introducing Mobilgard™ 560 VS

• Performance in a Variable Sulphur CLO

• Demonstrated Performance

Page 3: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

3

Introducing Mobilgard™ 560 VS

Page 4: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

4

Mobilgard™ 560 VS: The Optimum Choice

• Convenient: single oil

• Optimum flexibility and performance

• Lower operational cost

• Complex: 2 or 3 choices

• Opportunity for mistakes

• Higher operational cost

Multiple Individual Cylinder Oils

Variable Sulphur Solution

Page 5: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

5

Mobilgard™ 560 VS Performance Requirements

Equal or better performance

Simplicity: Variable Sulphur Use

OEM Endorsements

Global Consistency

Page 6: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

6

Deposit ChemistryWhat happens in a cylinder:

Mobilgard 560™ VS: 70 BN Equivalent Performance

• Combustion acids interact with base, detergent, dispersant in cylinder oil

• Not all additives are equal!

• Detergent and dispersant interactions

• Acid neutralisation optimised to protect engines

Acid Neutralised

Base

D

Base

D

Base

D

Yellow – DetergentGreen - Dispersant

Combustion Acid

Optimised for Engine Protection

Page 7: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

7

Mobilgard™ 560 VS Keys to Performance

With High-S HFOs:

– Enhanced Mobilgard™ 570 based technology– Optimised acid neutralisation rate– Addition of special dispersant additive – Cleanliness performance fully equivalent to

Mobilgard 570

Mobilgard 560 VS provides excellent high S protection

With Low-S HFOs:

– Balanced additive technology – Minimises deposit causing ash– Allows controlled corrosion – Excellent boundary lubrication

Page 8: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

8

Meets OEM Requirements

• All field trials run at 70 BN feed rates

• MAN: Testimony Letter acknowledges successful operation at 70 BN equivalent minimum feed rates

• Wärtsilä: Follow OEM guidelines for 60 BN operation with opportunity to reduce to 70 BN equivalent feed rates

High Sulphur

Low Sulphur

Page 9: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

9

MAN General Field Trial Results• 12K98MC-C engine• Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours• Sulphur range from 1.39 - 3.75%S• 48% engine load

00.050.1

0.150.2

0.250.3

0.350.4

Wea

r Rat

e, m

m/1

,000

ho

urs

Cyl.No. 12 - MG LXXX(XN 5744E)

Cyl, No. 7 - MG 570Ref.

Piston Ring and Cylinder Liner Max. Wear Rates

Piston Top Ring Max. Wear RateCylinder Liner Max. Wear Rate

MAN max. normal liner wear rate Source: MAN Diesel

Page 10: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

10

Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance

• Reduced liner wear

Source: MAN Diesel

Page 11: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

11

MAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results• 12K98 ME engine• Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours• Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S• 48% engine load

Source: MAN DieselCylinder Scrape-down Oil Iron Content

Page 12: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

12

Wärtsilä General Field Trial Results

Maximum liner wear unit 2

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

start of test end of test

mm/100

0h

Max. wear longitudinal

Max. wear transverse

• Wärtsilä 10RTflex96C-B engine• Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 5,600 hours• Sulphur range up to 3.8%S• 30 - 50% engine load

Source: ExxonMobil

Page 13: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

13

Wärtsilä Low Sulphur Field Trial Results

• Wärtsilä 7RTA52U engine• Test period: 2,000 hours• Fuel sulphur: 0.99%• 97% engine load

Source: Wartsila

Page 14: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

14

Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance• MAN 7S70 MC engine, semi-high top land piston design• Step-change reduction on feed rates to below OEM min for 70 BN • Test period: Two, 4 day “sweep” tests • Fuel Sulphur: 3.49%• 83 - 85% engine load

Scra

pedo

wn

oil

Fe, p

pm(S

eaM

ate

unit)

Feed rate, g/kW h

Cyl. 1-4: MG 560 VS(Cyl. 4: 10 insul. pipes)

Cyl. 5-6: MG 570(Cyl. 6: 24 insul. Pipes)

OEM Min Feed Rate0.26 x S% for this engine type

Source: ExxonMobil

Page 15: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

15

Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance

• Wärtsilä 10RTflex96 C-B engine• Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 2,500 hours• Sulphur range up to 3.8%S• 9 - 30% engine load

Source: ExxonMobil

Page 16: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

16

Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Experience List

Experience Hours 2010 2011 2012 (to date)

MAN 9,200 10,300 35,100

Wärtsilä 5,600 3,100 5,100

Grand Total 14,800 13,400 40,200

• MAN Experience:– K98 ME– K98 MC– L70, L60 MC– S50, S60, S70 MC

• Wärtsilä Experience:– RT-Flex 96C-B– RTA 52U

• Anticpate 150,000+ vessel running hours by product launch

Page 17: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

17

Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance

MAN ultra-low feed rate trial• Tested at OEM minimum feed rates for over 4,000 hours

• Opportunity to reduce feed rate lower (currently @ 0.45 g/kWh)

Normal High

Normal Low Test (Mobilgard™ 560 VS)

Reference (Mobilgard™ 570)

Source: MAN Diesel

Page 18: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

18

MAN low feed rate trial - piston overhauls in excess of 40,000 hours

Reducing the feed rate also reduced wear Source:MAN

Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance

Page 19: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

19

MobilGard™ Cylinder Condition Monitoring

Technology leadership to get the most out of your engine

Page 20: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

20

Competitive Analysis

Mobilgard™ 560 VS demonstrates better performance than competition

Better

Mobilgard™ 560 VS Competitor A Competitor B Competitor C Competitor D

Viscosity @ 250ºC:Component Protection

Volatility: Component Protection

Deposits: Cleanliness

Oxidation: Cleanliness

Page 21: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

21

Mobilgard™ 560 VS Delivers

Cleaner pistons

Outstanding engine wear

protection

Potential lower feed rates

Potential extended piston overhauls

Engineered performance for today’s challenges

Lower overallcost of operation

Page 22: Mobilgard 560 VS - CepsaMAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results • 12K98 ME engine • Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours • Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S

22