mobilgard 560 vs - cepsaman low sulphur field trial results • 12k98 me engine • tested at oem...
TRANSCRIPT
Note: For Planning Purposes only. Nothing contained herein is intended to override the corporate separateness of affiliated companies. Final designs for organizational structures, processes, and accountabilities are subject to appropriate management approvals, observance of corporate separateness principles and other requirements of applicable laws, and appropriate contractual arrangements. All competitive data/ information contained herein was obtained, or extrapolated from, publicly available sources, customer feedback and internally generated observations, interpreted as appropriate. The information contained in this presentation is confidential and may not be copied, reproduced or disclosed in any manner whatsoever by the recipient without the prior written consent of ExxonMobil.
Mobilgard™ 560 VS
The engineered advantage™
PresenterAugust 2012
2
Agenda
• Introducing Mobilgard™ 560 VS
• Performance in a Variable Sulphur CLO
• Demonstrated Performance
3
Introducing Mobilgard™ 560 VS
4
Mobilgard™ 560 VS: The Optimum Choice
• Convenient: single oil
• Optimum flexibility and performance
• Lower operational cost
• Complex: 2 or 3 choices
• Opportunity for mistakes
• Higher operational cost
Multiple Individual Cylinder Oils
Variable Sulphur Solution
5
Mobilgard™ 560 VS Performance Requirements
Equal or better performance
Simplicity: Variable Sulphur Use
OEM Endorsements
Global Consistency
6
Deposit ChemistryWhat happens in a cylinder:
Mobilgard 560™ VS: 70 BN Equivalent Performance
• Combustion acids interact with base, detergent, dispersant in cylinder oil
• Not all additives are equal!
• Detergent and dispersant interactions
• Acid neutralisation optimised to protect engines
Acid Neutralised
Base
D
Base
D
Base
D
Yellow – DetergentGreen - Dispersant
Combustion Acid
Optimised for Engine Protection
7
Mobilgard™ 560 VS Keys to Performance
With High-S HFOs:
– Enhanced Mobilgard™ 570 based technology– Optimised acid neutralisation rate– Addition of special dispersant additive – Cleanliness performance fully equivalent to
Mobilgard 570
Mobilgard 560 VS provides excellent high S protection
With Low-S HFOs:
– Balanced additive technology – Minimises deposit causing ash– Allows controlled corrosion – Excellent boundary lubrication
8
Meets OEM Requirements
• All field trials run at 70 BN feed rates
• MAN: Testimony Letter acknowledges successful operation at 70 BN equivalent minimum feed rates
• Wärtsilä: Follow OEM guidelines for 60 BN operation with opportunity to reduce to 70 BN equivalent feed rates
High Sulphur
Low Sulphur
9
MAN General Field Trial Results• 12K98MC-C engine• Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours• Sulphur range from 1.39 - 3.75%S• 48% engine load
00.050.1
0.150.2
0.250.3
0.350.4
Wea
r Rat
e, m
m/1
,000
ho
urs
Cyl.No. 12 - MG LXXX(XN 5744E)
Cyl, No. 7 - MG 570Ref.
Piston Ring and Cylinder Liner Max. Wear Rates
Piston Top Ring Max. Wear RateCylinder Liner Max. Wear Rate
MAN max. normal liner wear rate Source: MAN Diesel
10
Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance
• Reduced liner wear
Source: MAN Diesel
11
MAN Low Sulphur Field Trial Results• 12K98 ME engine• Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 4,000 hours• Sulphur from 0.89 - 0.94%S• 48% engine load
Source: MAN DieselCylinder Scrape-down Oil Iron Content
12
Wärtsilä General Field Trial Results
Maximum liner wear unit 2
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
start of test end of test
mm/100
0h
Max. wear longitudinal
Max. wear transverse
• Wärtsilä 10RTflex96C-B engine• Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 5,600 hours• Sulphur range up to 3.8%S• 30 - 50% engine load
Source: ExxonMobil
13
Wärtsilä Low Sulphur Field Trial Results
• Wärtsilä 7RTA52U engine• Test period: 2,000 hours• Fuel sulphur: 0.99%• 97% engine load
Source: Wartsila
14
Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance• MAN 7S70 MC engine, semi-high top land piston design• Step-change reduction on feed rates to below OEM min for 70 BN • Test period: Two, 4 day “sweep” tests • Fuel Sulphur: 3.49%• 83 - 85% engine load
Scra
pedo
wn
oil
Fe, p
pm(S
eaM
ate
unit)
Feed rate, g/kW h
Cyl. 1-4: MG 560 VS(Cyl. 4: 10 insul. pipes)
Cyl. 5-6: MG 570(Cyl. 6: 24 insul. Pipes)
OEM Min Feed Rate0.26 x S% for this engine type
Source: ExxonMobil
15
Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance
• Wärtsilä 10RTflex96 C-B engine• Tested at OEM minimum 70 BN feed rates • Test period: 2,500 hours• Sulphur range up to 3.8%S• 9 - 30% engine load
Source: ExxonMobil
16
Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Experience List
Experience Hours 2010 2011 2012 (to date)
MAN 9,200 10,300 35,100
Wärtsilä 5,600 3,100 5,100
Grand Total 14,800 13,400 40,200
• MAN Experience:– K98 ME– K98 MC– L70, L60 MC– S50, S60, S70 MC
• Wärtsilä Experience:– RT-Flex 96C-B– RTA 52U
• Anticpate 150,000+ vessel running hours by product launch
17
Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance
MAN ultra-low feed rate trial• Tested at OEM minimum feed rates for over 4,000 hours
• Opportunity to reduce feed rate lower (currently @ 0.45 g/kWh)
Normal High
Normal Low Test (Mobilgard™ 560 VS)
Reference (Mobilgard™ 570)
Source: MAN Diesel
18
MAN low feed rate trial - piston overhauls in excess of 40,000 hours
Reducing the feed rate also reduced wear Source:MAN
Mobilgard™ 560 VS – Proof of Performance
19
MobilGard™ Cylinder Condition Monitoring
Technology leadership to get the most out of your engine
20
Competitive Analysis
Mobilgard™ 560 VS demonstrates better performance than competition
Better
Mobilgard™ 560 VS Competitor A Competitor B Competitor C Competitor D
Viscosity @ 250ºC:Component Protection
Volatility: Component Protection
Deposits: Cleanliness
Oxidation: Cleanliness
21
Mobilgard™ 560 VS Delivers
Cleaner pistons
Outstanding engine wear
protection
Potential lower feed rates
Potential extended piston overhauls
Engineered performance for today’s challenges
Lower overallcost of operation
22