minutes of meeting / workshop (with all states …...minutes of meeting / workshop (with all states...
TRANSCRIPT
Minutes of Meeting / Workshop (with all States except Goa) on
(I) Review held in 2nd & 3rd week of January 2019 and (II) National Workshop on AAP entry Formats held on 28-29 January, 2019
I. In one to one meetings held with the State Officials (except Goa which has not attended) in 2nd & 3rd week of January 2019, following issues
have been deliberated and the same along with actionable matters are as under:
S. No. Issues Deliberations Action / Remarks
1. Annual Action Plan
preparation
Link regarding AAP formats for 2019-
20 to be filled by the State :
State/District Login--->AAP 2019-20 --
->Entry --->AAP for Ongoing Scheme
(State approval also required)
This year States will fill up AAP templates wherein they
will select schemes based on descending order of
financial liability. E.g. states are to select the schemes in
the following order:
a) Schemes physically 100% completed but
financially incomplete
b) >75 to <100% financially incomplete
c) >50 to <75% financially incomplete
d) >25 to <50% financially incomplete
Objective of this exercise is to ensure funds are used to
prioritise completion of schemes which are nearing
completion.
AAP formats were discussed withStates. It was also
informed that States along with IMIS Co-ordinators must
attend the meetings scheduled to be held on 28-29th
January,2019.
2. IMIS updation before April
1st,2019
Link regarding latest update on Age-
wise analysis of ongoing schemes;
State/District Login--->AAP 2019-20 --
->Entry --->AAP for Ongoing Scheme
(State approval also required)
E-in-C / CE / representative of State are requested to
review and analyse their schemesage-wise for deletion /
continuation with reasons.
3. Reducing unspent balance
and ensuring permissible
Opening Balance (< 10% of
previous year release)
Link for Format D-1B of IMIS
regarding latest update on unspent
balance :
State/District Login--->AAP 2019-20 --
->Entry --->AAP for Ongoing Scheme
(State approval also required)
Representative from State have assured to utilize the
unspent balance by end of March, 2019 reducing the
available funds as per permissible OB for 2019-20. State
was also requested to submit action plan in this regard.
Time line for completion before April 1st, 2019.
4. Household connection -
survey
Link regarding formats for Household
connections survey in the States :
State/District Login--->AAP 2019-20 --
States were explained about the survey for assessing
household connections per village to assess actual
position of Piped Water Supply connections and they
->House Connection --->Update PWS
House Connection information (State
approval also required)
were asked to start carrying out survey with their
resources by end of March, 2019 positively.
Stateshave shown their agreement to carry out this survey
on priority within this time frame.
5. Registration of PFMS Formats for implementation of PFMS
attached as Annexure-1.
Formats for providing details of Nodal
Officer, Existing Fund Flow, Agency
Registration with Agency Name,
Account No. etc. for smooth
implementation of Receipt,
Expenditure, Advance and Transfer
Module (REAT).
Most of the States have informed that they have already
registered their State level agency and registration /
mapping of child level agency is in progress. Further,
State has also informed about their funds flow.
States are requested to take necessary step for
implementation of REAT module under PFMS
mandatorily by 31.03.2019 as per requirement of Ministry
of Finance, GoI and to provide the desired information to
this Ministry as per prescribed format.
6. Geo-tagging State was asked to review and analyse
Format F-21 of IMIS
As per Format F-21 of IMIS, it is observed that there is
very poor progress (less percentage) of geo-tagging of
NRDWP Assets. Most of the States who have already
geo-tagged their assets are required to integrate the same
with IMIS with the help of NIC team of this Ministry.
States were requested to complete the geo-tagging of
remaining assets.
7. Pending Calamity UC Details of pending UC / ASA under
Calamity Component as Annexure-2.
Concerned States were asked to submit either UC or
refund the unspent funds immediately to this Ministry in
order to comply with the observations of CAG Audit.
8. Pending UC/ASA under
NCEF/MNRE Fund
Details of pending UC / ASA under
NCEF/MNRE Fund as Annexure-3.
Concerned States are requested to submit UC /ASA for
NCEF/MNRE Fund with reporting of the physical
achievements in IMIS formats C-35B & C-35C in order
to comply with the observations of CAG Audit.
9. IT / IMIS Issue IMIS entry issues have been sorted out
instantly or have been brought to the
notice of NIC.
Further, in meeting /workshop with the States (IMIS
Coordinators/IT Managers) to be held on 28-29.01.2019,
all queries will be clarified.
10. NWQSM Action Plan regarding left out quality
affected habitations
Attached herewith.
II. National Workshop on AAP entry Formats held on 28-29 January, 2019 – This was chaired
by JS(Water) on 28th and Secretary, MDWS on 29th. Secretaries of few States, Chief Engineer of
most of the States and various other officials have participated in this Workshop. Discussions are
summarized as under:
A. Director (Water) in the National has shown PPT and explained following:
a. Reason why a new way of submitting Annual Action Plan Formats (AAP) is being
introduced for 2019-20 which are as under:
i. Huge Nos. of Ongoing Schemes, Huge Liability of Ongoing Schemes
ii. Huge Nos. of old ongoing Schemes,
iii. Huge ongoing Schemes with Nil expenditure in last 3 years
iv. States do not mark the habitations as target for Coverage in the Year
v. Physical Progress (based on Milestone) - not entered / not updated
vi. Work Order date and SLSSC date – not entered
As such, it has been decided that let States go through each scheme while preparing AAP
& update them and let Districts also to be part of the planning and progressing of
Schemes and Coverage of Habitations. For this, State has to furnish physical & financial
progress of each & every scheme and habitations proposed to be covered is required to be
tagged online. Subsequent to this, NIC officials have explained how to fill AAP formats.
Every State has been given one Laptop equipped with Internet to get familiarised with the
process and hands on training in this regard.
b. Regarding huge numbers of Ongoing schemes with huge balance committed liability
across the country which is more than three times the notional annual allocation in
case of few States. Further, there are schemes which are very old or inactive ongoing
schemes which are required to be looked into by the States, failing which these will
be put in a suspense account and would be deleted if States does not submit the
request within a window of 2-3 months. In addition to this, there are non-existent
schemes, may be due to non-updation in IMIS. These are also required to be deleted
(if no expenditure was made on that) to avoid criticism.
c. Utilization of available fund with the States while aiming to reduce Unspent amount
immediately failing which releases for next year will get affected. Huge unspent
balance with the State has also caused a substantial cut in Budgetary Allocation of
2018-19 at Ministry Level.
d. Shared the extract of findings (of the draft report, final report is still awaited) of third
party evaluation survey done by M/s WAPCOS regarding Functionality status of
completed PWSS of NRDWP and requested the States for looking into it and for
taking corrective and preventive actions.
e. Expeditious action on Geo-tagging of Water Supply Schemes.
f. Need for capturing House Hold Connections (Govt. or Own) irrespective of the
funding through which it has been provided. NIC officials have shown a format to be
filled up in IMIS online.
g. Explained proposed ranking (Composite Index) of the States based on their
performance with respect various criteria.
B. Deputy Advisor has explained
a. The need of taking up Swajal Schemes in all Aspirational Districts and expeditious
action required by the State in this respect. The detail in this regard should also be
furnished in IMIS.
b. The restructuring of procedure / methodology of Appraisal with respect to innovative
technologies to be considered by High Level Standing Committee in this regard.
C. Deputy Secretary (Water) has explained
a. Rankings of Laboratories
b. Demonstrated the roster for sample collection
c. Explained Geo-fencing in sample collection done in West Bengal, this was also
presented in length by officer of West Bengal
D. Joint Secretary (Water), through her presentation, has explained the importance of (a) online
entry of AAP Format while tagging the progress of schemes and coverage of habitations, (b)
expeditious utilization of funds while aiming to reduce unspent amount, (c) geo-tagging, (d)
Household connection survey, (e) proper manning, equipping & utilizing laboratories, (f) ranking
of states for overall performance & performance of laboratories as well, (g) adequate O&M for
keeping the schemes functional, (h) completion of ongoing schemes which are in higher level of
physical progress and sending the old / inactive schemes into suspense account which will be
ultimately closed for progressing further.
E. Secretary, MDWS has stressed upon all the aforesaid issues raised by various officials of MDWS
and requested the State Officials to make all out efforts by them for maximizing the coverage of
piped water supply and household connections in rural areas. He has also impressed on
expeditious completion of ongoing schemes and adequate O&M of completed schemes.
Encl.: Annexures as stated above & PPTs shown in the Workshop
Meeting with States– NRDWP (MDWS)
Agenda
1. Annual Action Plan Strategy
2. Suspense Account of schemes
3. Unspent amount
4. Geo-tagging
5. Comprehensive NRDWP Ranking of States
6. Household Connections - Survey
Annual Action Plan Strategy
• Bottom up Approach
• Spending in the order of descending order of financial liability of schemes (100 – 75 – 50 – 25%)
• All schemes to be mandatorily updated
Suspense Account of Schemes
24%
4%
72%
Chart Title
All Schemes Prior to31.03.2013
Scheme of 01.04.13 to31.03.15 AND NO FPin 01.01.2016 to23.01.2019
Schemes that will belive or exceptions(NWQSM, LIS)
24%
4%
72%
Chart Title
All Schemes Prior to31.03.2013
Scheme of 01.04.13to 31.03.15 AND NOFP in 01.01.2016 to23.01.2019
Schemes that will belive or exceptions(NWQSM, LIS)
Nos. of Schemes going to the suspense account
Balance Liability of these Schemes which are going to the suspense account Rs. Cr.
Ongoing Schemes – Suspense account liability
S. No.Non NE and Non
Himalayan State Name
Going in SuspenseS. No. NE and Himalayan State Name
Going in Suspense
Nos. Balance Nos. Balance
1 MAHARASHTRA5,291
2,741 1 HIMACHAL PRADESH160 1,011
2 RAJASTHAN67
1,972 2 JAMMU & KASHMIR942 870
3 TELANGANA222
985 3 ASSAM954 408
4 KERALA229
743 4 MEGHALAYA167 347
5 KARNATAKA879
708 5 UTTARAKHAND38 66
Total 8,268 9,232 Total2,590 2,776
Unspent Balance
Unspent Balance – Rs. Cr. (coverage) – Non NE & Non Him States
365.25
224.3
178.48
116.85109.2285.88
68.1 67.08
39.97 33.0722.56 21.17 17.19 15.13 9.98 1.03 0.3 0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Non NE / Non Him States Unspent Balance - Coverage, Rs. Cr.
Unspent Balance – Rs. Cr. (coverage) NE and Him States
124.83
72.39
52.92
43.39 39.93
24.25 22.9316.49
12.255.08
1.36 1.27 00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
NE / Him States Unspent Balance - Coverage, Rs. Cr
Geo-Tagging
Geo-Tagging
87.13
71.0970.12
53.2849.8748.56 47.6
38.0934.1
29.6524.59
15.7914.0413.2413.1711.7810.926.94 5.82 5.75 4.88 2.79 1.34 1.27 0.26 0.26 0.16 0 0 0 0 0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage of Approved Geotagged Photographs
Comprehensive NRDWP Ranking of States
Comprehensive NRDWP Ranking of States
Indices Weightages
assigned
Measurement unit
Coverage 15 %
Performance of Water Quality
Labs
10 Marks
Monitoring 20 In percentages
Finance (Budget) 15 In percentages
Sustainability 40 In percentages
76.99
69.35 66.34 66.32 66.15 65.66 65.26
60.67 59.90 58.56 57.46
50.25 49.07 47.53 45.45
41.64
32.84 32.74
-
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Ranking of states – Non NE and Non Him
68.65 66.73 64.41 60.34 59.40
50.98 50.30 49.67 48.18 47.81 45.47
11.52 8.36
-
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Ranking of states - NE and Him states
Household Survey
House hold Survey:Around 18 % of rural households have PWS connections;
1. SBM directory2. Private connection and Scheme details3. Support fund and their own resources.
o List of existing schemes in IMIS will be displayed (NRDWP and other schemes):
1
2
o Provision to add new scheme: State Government funded or any other
S.
No.
Name of the scheme Funded through :
Select : State Government /
PRI / other funds
Estimated cost of
the scheme in Cr.
Year of
commissioning
Type of scheme:
Select : PWS /Tube Well, Hand pump / Point
treatment system (CWPPs)
1
2
o Household data from SBM directory will displayed:
S.
No.
Family
Head Name
Father /
Husband
Name
Gender Category Card type Card
NumberDoes this
house exists
in the village
Availability of water tap within premises
(Household Connection)
1 Government
Connection
Private
Connection
Both Connection
2
o Data will be validated by :
1. Junior Engineer / Assistant Engineer, PHED, Panchayat Development Officer (PDO) & Sarpanch Gram Panchayat
Household Connections - Survey
Appendix
Comprehensive NRDWP Ranking of StatesIndices Factors Weightages
assigned
Measurement
unit
Coverage (i) Fully Covered (FC) Habitations
(ii) Piped Water Supply (PWS) Population in FC habitations
(iii) Household Connection
5
5
5
%
Performance of
Water Quality
Labs
Lab Ranking done by the Ministry 10 Marks
In marks
Monitoring (i) Geo-tagging of assets
(ii) Entering the date of approval of the scheme by the State level Scheme
Sanctioning Committee meetings in IMIS
(iii) Entering the date of Work Order in IMIS
(iv)Milestone based physical progress
(v) Having a State level grievance redressal mechanism
5
2.5
2.5
5
5
In percentages
Finance
(Budget)
(i) Ratio of Total Release minus NWQSM to total Allocation minus NWQSM
(ii) Ratio of Total expenditure minus NWQSM to total release minus NWQSM
(iii) Ratio of Pre-finance amount to Notional allocation in pre-finance.
5
5
5
In percentages
Sustainability (i) Third party survey result
(ii) Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Policy implementation
(iii) O&M budget
30
5
5
In percentages
Agenda – Water Quality
1. National Water Quality Sub-missiona) Left out habitationsb) Unspent Balancec) Action Points to States
2. Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillancea) Expenditure 2018-19b) Water Quality Testing Labs
i. Lab Rankingii. Sample Collection
3. Uniform Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Protocol-2019
4. Revamp of High Level Technical Committee
NWQSM: State-wise left-out habitations as on 24.01.2019S.No. State Name Left out habitations
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 58
2 ASSAM 1421
3 BIHAR 241
4 CHHATTISGARH 18
5 HARYANA 39
6 JHARKHAND 115
7 KARNATAKA 60
8 KERALA 25
9 MADHYA PRADESH 02
10 MAHARASHTRA 21
11 ODISHA 35
12 PUNJAB 265
13 RAJASTHAN 1969
14 TELANGANA 0
15 UTTAR PRADESH 159
16 WEST BENGAL 2453Total 6881
• States are advised to get theleft-out habitations re-testedfor the presence chemicalcontamination in NABLaccredited labs.
NWQSM: State-wise Unspent Balance as on 24.01.2019S. No State Name Unspent Balance(cr.)
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 25.742 ASSAM 294.983 BIHAR 147.314 CHHATTISGARH 0.95 HARYANA 7.286 JHARKHAND 31.477 KARNATAKA 25.918 KERALA 4.439 MADHYA PRADESH 1.26
10 MAHARASHTRA 16.6211 ODISHA 0.0112 PUNJAB 98.0113 RAJASTHAN 379.9614 TELANGANA 3.815 UTTAR PRADESH 24.9616 WEST BENGAL 778.41
Total 1841.05
• NWQSM funds can be used inconvergence with other fundsi.e. the funds can be in externalaided projects/State schemesto the extent of eligibility.
• State are to provideexpenditure plan for utilizingunspent balance in AAP.
National Water Quality Sub-Mission (NWQSM)Action Points for States
All States requested to submit proposals for left-outhabitation on or before 31st January, 2019. Noproposal will be considered beyond the cut off date.
NWQSM has sunset clause i.e. to be completed byMarch, 2021.
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS)Expenditure 2018-19
S. No State
Notional Availability = OB
+ Full Central Allocation
However this will vary as
per the Release In Cr.
Current Availability for the year =
1/18 of expenditure on Hardware
on Coverage In Cr
Expenditure in Cr.Percentage Of
Expenditure
1 MIZORAM 48.31 1.72 1.71 99.56
2 ANDHRA PRADESH 197.99 3.38 3.23 95.65
3 ASSAM 503.5 4.92 4.58 93.14
4 WEST BENGAL 424.48 11.11 10.2 91.77
5 CHHATTISGARH 121.36 1.75 1.21 69.19
… ... … … … …
26 PUDUCHERRY 2.56 0 0 0
27 MANIPUR 67.62 2.66 0 0
28 KARNATAKA 489.63 15.77 0 0
29 ANDAMAN & NICOBAR 1.68 0 0 0
30 BIHAR 341.52 1.3 0 0
States are requested to utilize full available funding under this component as this reflects in the health of the laboratories.
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS)Water Quality Testing Labs
• Lab Ranking• To encourage competitiveness, greater ownership,
improve the quality and strengthen labs functioning.• 40% weightage to infrastructure & AMC and 60%
weightage for performance based indicators.
• Sample Collection• 75% of tests are to be conducted based on roster
and for remaining 25% flexibility is given to States.
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS)Lab Ranking - States
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS)Lab Ranking – Districts
UDWP-2019• To address emerging contaminants, include technological
enhancements and reforms in procurements the existingProtocol is revised.
• Main Features Flexibility
Regional labs can be set up; can outsource labs
Outcome Oriented
Robust ProceduresRoster based sample collection/testing
Geo-tagging of all sources
AMC/CAMC of instruments/equipment
NABL accreditation as per IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017
Cross verification of test results and 3rd Party verification of labs
Revamp of High Level Technical Committee
•Composition of Committee – top technical institutions
•Rigorous 360 degree process introduced • First Stage – field evaluation of technology by NEERI• Second Stage – reports by user States • Third State – Appraisal by the Committee
ASSURED Matrix
• Coined by the Chairman Dr. RA Mashelkar of HLTC
A – Affordability
S – Scalability
S – Sustainability
U – Universality
R – Rapid
E – Excellence
D – Distinctive
• Assured matrix framework
THANKS
Welcome to
Water Teams from States
National Rural Drinking Water Programme
National Workshop on Annual Action Plan (AAP)
28-29 January 2019
Govt. of India
Ministry of Drinking Water & Sanitation
2
Agendao Annual Action Plan
o Ongoing schemes
o Very Old or Inactive Ongoing Schemes
o Non-existant Schemes, may be due to non-updatio in IMIS
o Target Marking of Habitations
o Unspent amount
o Geo-tagging
o Household Connections - Survey
Annual Action PlanIt is an Annual Event. Then why this Worksop?
Explanation:
Huge Nos. of Ongoing Schemes, Huge Liability of Ongoing Schemes
Huge Nos. of old ongoing Schemes,
Huge ongoing Schemes with Nil expenditure in last 3 years
States do not mark the habitations as target for Coverage in the Year
Physical Progress (based on Milestone) - not entered / not updated
Work Order date and SLSSC date – not entered
Remedy:
Let States go through each scheme while preparing AAP and update them.
Let Districts also to be part of the planning and progressing of Schemes and Coverage of Habitations.
-
718 170
1,517 1,840
97 134
1,253 774
1,408 1,082
626
2,720
1,334 1,467
3,409
74 349 11 9
1,399
-640
13,644
64
849
1,750
21
2,827
271
10,571
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000
A&
N
Andh
ra P
radesh
Arunachal…
Assam
Bih
ar
Chh
attis
ga
rh
Goa
Gu
jara
t
Hary
ana
Himachal…
J&
K
Jhark
ha
nd
Karn
ata
ka
Kera
la
Madh
ya P
radesh
Maha
rashtr
a
Manip
ur
Megh
ala
ya
Miz
ora
m
Nag
ala
nd
Odis
ha
Pudu
cherr
y
Punja
b
Raja
sth
an
Sik
kim
Ta
mil
Nad
u
Te
lan
gana
Tri
pura
Utta
r P
radesh
Utt
ara
kh
an
d
West B
en
gal
Ongoing Schemes - Balance Liability (Rs. crore)
- 1.9 1.6
3.6 2.8
0.5 2.6
4.7
13.9
3.2 2.4
4.4
7.6
2.7 3.6
1.7
6.0
0.4 0.2
4.5
-3.0
11.6
4.9
2.4
6.7
0.3 2.8 2.5
13.0
-
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
20.0A
&N
An
dh
ra P
rad
esh
Aru
nac
hal
Pra
des
h
Ass
am
Bih
ar
Ch
hat
tisg
arh
Go
a
Gu
jara
t
Har
yan
a
Him
ach
al P
rad
esh
J&K
Jhar
khan
d
Kar
nat
aka
Ke
rala
Mad
hya
Pra
des
h
Mah
aras
htr
a
Man
ipu
r
Meg
hal
aya
Miz
ora
m
Nag
alan
d
Od
ish
a
Pu
du
cher
ry
Pu
nja
b
Raj
asth
an
Sikk
im
Tam
il N
adu
Tela
nga
na
Trip
ura
Utt
ar P
rad
esh
Utt
arak
han
d
Wes
t B
enga
l
Balance Liabilty / (Central Allocation in Coverage Component + State matching Share)
-
1,727
584
1,802 1,632
917
2 149
952
440
1,153
2,553
6,123
322
2,396
7,526
496 194
17 26
4,719
-
398 474 124 191
1,119
143
1,876
470
1,129
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
A&
N
An
dhra
Pra
de
sh
Aru
na
ch
al P
rad
esh
Assam
Bih
ar
Ch
ha
ttis
ga
rh
Goa
Gu
jara
t
Ha
rya
na
Him
acha
l P
rad
esh
J&
K
Jh
ark
ha
nd
Ka
rna
taka
Ke
rala
Ma
dh
ya
Pra
de
sh
Ma
ha
rash
tra
Ma
nip
ur
Me
gh
ala
ya
Miz
ora
m
Na
ga
lan
d
Od
ish
a
Pu
duch
err
y
Pu
nja
b
Ra
jasth
an
Sik
kim
Ta
mil
Na
du
Te
lan
ga
na
Trip
ura
Utta
r P
rad
esh
Utta
rakh
an
d
We
st B
en
ga
l
Schemes Analysis - Nos.
Age Analysis of ongoing schemes
(Balance in Rs. Cr.)
Total SVS MVS
Nos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. Balance
Schemes Prior to 31.03.2000 178 934 73 52 105 881
Scheme of 01.04.2000 to 31.03.09 3,229 5,005 2,557 852 672 4,153
Scheme of 01.04.09 to 31.03.13
Total 6,026 12,236 4,235 2,125 1,791 10,111
FP < 5% 608 1,354 503 501 105 852
FP >= 5% 5,418 10,881 3,732 1,623 1,686 9,258
All Schemes Prior to 31.03.2013 9,433 18,175 6,865 3,029 2,568 15,146
Scheme of 01.04.13 to 31.03.14
Total 3,402 9,211 2,702 1,694 700 7,517
FP < 5% 476 3,721 387 431 89 3,290
FP >= 5% 2,926 5,490 2,315 1,263 611 4,227
Scheme of 01.04.14 to 31.03.17
Total 10,798 9,787 9,394 3,856 1,404 5,931
FP < 15% 3,050 3,747 2,648 2,363 402 1,384
FP >=15% 7,748 6,039 6,746 1,492 1,002 4,547
Scheme after 31.03.2017 16,021 13,850 15,435 6,064 586 7,786
All Schemes 39,654 51,025 34,396 14,644 5,258 36,381
Concept of Suspense Account
Suspense Account of Schemes:
There are about 40,000 schemes (PWS) with outstanding liability of still over 52,000 Cr.
oStates to analyze whether these schemes are dead and moribund, by doing ground truthing.
oThese schemes will be put in a separate account from post 31th March (after all AAP
meetings). Exceptions must be discussed during AAP meeting and closed.
o If found to have been completed but not updated in the system or requiring foreclosure, the
said status should be updated in IMIS in March MPR.
oOtherwise, these schemes would be closed and put under the category of completed schemes
and no further funds can be booked against these schemes from central fund (NRDWP).
Suspense Account of Schemes: Rules
Schemes have been classified as –
All Schemes prior to 31.03.2013
Scheme of 01.04.2013 to 31.03.2015
wherein Nil Expenditure has been booked in last 3 years
Ongoing schemes-Inactive
(Balance in Rs. Cr.)
Total SVS MVS
Nos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. Balance
All Schemes 39,654 51,025 34,396 14,644 5,258 36,381
Schemes prior to 31.03.13
(X)9,433 18,175 6,865 3,029 2,568 15,146
Scheme of 01.04.13 to
31.03.15 having Nil
Expenditure in 01.01.2016
to 23.01.19 (Y)
1,727 1,733 1,530 1,460 197 273
Going in Suspense
(X+Y-NWQSM-LIS)10,858 12,007 8,296 4,434 2,562 7,572
-
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
A&
N
An
dh
ra P
rad
esh
Aru
nac
hal
Pra
des
h
Ass
am
Bih
ar
Ch
hat
tisg
arh
Go
a
Gu
jara
t
Har
yan
a
Him
ach
al P
rad
esh
J&K
Jhar
khan
d
Kar
nat
aka
Ke
rala
Mad
hya
Pra
des
h
Mah
aras
htr
a
Man
ipu
r
Meg
hal
aya
Miz
ora
m
Nag
alan
d
Od
ish
a
Pu
du
che
rry
Pu
nja
b
Raj
asth
an
Sikk
im
Tam
il N
adu
Tela
nga
na
Trip
ura
Utt
ar P
rad
esh
Utt
arak
han
d
Wes
t B
en
gal
Schemes Analysis - Nos. Nos. Ongoing Nos. Live Ongoing
-
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
14,000A
&N
An
dhra
Pra
de
sh
Aru
na
ch
al P
rad
esh
Assam
Bih
ar
Ch
ha
ttis
ga
rh
Goa
Gu
jara
t
Ha
rya
na
Him
acha
l P
rad
esh
J&
K
Jh
ark
ha
nd
Karn
ata
ka
Ke
rala
Ma
dh
ya
Pra
de
sh
Ma
ha
rash
tra
Ma
nip
ur
Me
gh
ala
ya
Miz
ora
m
Na
ga
lan
d
Od
ish
a
Pu
duch
err
y
Pu
nja
b
Ra
jasth
an
Sik
kim
Ta
mil
Na
du
Tela
ngana
Trip
ura
Utta
r P
rad
esh
Utta
rakh
an
d
We
st B
en
ga
l
Schemes Analysis – Balance (Rs. Crore) Balance (Rs. Cr) Ongoing Balance (Rs. Cr) Live Ongoing
0
1,428
58
879
194 446 0 0 157 213 369 179
5,320
128 282 125 13 55 35 47721
0 271
3,346
171780 652 80 243 338
3,090
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
An
dam
an &
…
An
dh
ra P
rad
esh
Aru
nac
hal
Pra
des
h
Ass
am
Bih
ar
Ch
hat
tisg
arh
Go
a
Gu
jara
t
Har
yan
a
Him
ach
al P
rad
esh
Jam
mu
& K
ash
mir
Jhar
khan
d
Kar
nat
aka
Ker
ala
Mad
hya
Pra
des
h
Mah
aras
htr
a
Man
ipu
r
Meg
hal
aya
Miz
ora
m
Nag
alan
d
Od
ish
a
Pu
du
che
rry
Pu
nja
b
Raj
asth
an
Sikk
im
Tam
il N
adu
Tela
nga
na
Trip
ura
Utt
ar P
rad
esh
Utt
arak
han
d
Wes
t B
en
gal
Targeted ( For PWS Schemes) Actual Covered
- -
1.45
3.89
-
0.51
- 0.01
1.90
4.40
1.25
5.51
1.14
3.24
0.74 0.78
1.52
0.50
1.67 1.25
0.39 -
0.42
2.62
3.49
2.37
3.14
5.13
-
6.61
7.49
An
dam
an &
Nic
ob
ar
An
dh
ra P
rad
esh
Aru
nac
hal
Pra
des
h
Ass
am
Bih
ar
Ch
hat
tisg
arh
Go
a
Gu
jara
t
Har
yan
a
Him
ach
al P
rad
esh
Jam
mu
& K
ash
mir
Jhar
khan
d
Kar
nat
aka
Ke
rala
Mad
hya
Pra
des
h
Mah
aras
htr
a
Man
ipu
r
Meg
hal
aya
Miz
ora
m
Nag
alan
d
Od
ish
a
Pu
du
che
rry
Pu
nja
b
Raj
asth
an
Sikk
im
Tam
il N
adu
Tela
nga
na
Trip
ura
Utt
ar P
rad
esh
Utt
arak
han
d
Wes
t B
en
gal
Habitations Targeted (For PWS Schemes) per Rs. Crore (of Central Allocation + State Matching Share)
Unspent Balance
-
20
40
60
80
100
120
A&
N
An
dh
ra…
Aru
nac
hal
…
Ass
am
Bih
ar
Ch
hat
tisg
arh
Go
a
Gu
jara
t
Har
yan
a
Him
ach
al…
J&K
Jhar
khan
d
Kar
nat
aka
Ker
ala
Mad
hya
…
Mah
aras
htr
a
Man
ipu
r
Meg
hal
aya
Miz
ora
m
Nag
alan
d
Od
ish
a
Pu
du
cher
ry
Pu
nja
b
Raj
asth
an
Sikk
im
Tam
il N
adu
Tela
nga
na
Trip
ura
Utt
ar P
rad
esh
Utt
arak
han
d
Wes
t B
enga
l
Central Expenditure of Coverage Component (in %) Central Expenditure of all Components (in %)
1
143
53
386 374
41 0 10 22 24
125 96 112
5 18
382
16 23 12 - 21 1
98
604
5 36
71 40
184
43
957
-
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
A&
N
An
dh
ra P
rad
esh
Aru
nac
hal
Pra
des
h
Ass
am
Bih
ar
Ch
hat
tisg
arh
Go
a
Gu
jara
t
Har
yan
a
Him
ach
al P
rad
esh
J&K
Jhar
khan
d
Kar
nat
aka
Ke
rala
Mad
hya
Pra
des
h
Mah
aras
htr
a
Man
ipu
r
Meg
hal
aya
Miz
ora
m
Nag
alan
d
Od
ish
a
Pu
du
che
rry
Pu
nja
b
Raj
asth
an
Sikk
im
Tam
il N
adu
Tela
nga
na
Trip
ura
Utt
ar P
rad
esh
Utt
arak
han
d
Wes
t B
en
gal
Closing balance of Coverage Component (Rs. Cr.)
Closing balance of all Components (Rs. Cr.)
Unspent Balance: consequences
Slow pace of physical progress of schemes
Huge unspent balance with the States as on date
(Rs. 3905 Crore)
Ministry could not release funds to States
Cut in Central Budget
To prevent the same in next year, States are required to accelerate the pace of utilization
Unspent Balance – Rs. Cr. (coverage)
365.25
224.3
178.48
116.85109.2285.88
68.1 67.08
39.97 33.0722.56 21.17 17.19 15.13 9.98 1.03 0.3 0
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Non NE / Non Him States Unspent Balance - Coverage, Rs. Cr.
124.83
72.39
52.92
43.3939.93
24.25 22.9316.49
12.255.08
1.36 1.27 00
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
NE / Him States Unspent Balance - Coverage, Rs. Cr
Monitoring
Monitoring Physical Progress of Water supply schemes
• Focus is on completion and functioning of schemes
• Monitoring through:
o Mandatory Entry of SLSSC date and First Work Order Date
o Scheme to be considered as ‘ongoing’ only if Work Order date is
entered.
o Physical progress of PWSS through Milestone based entry
o Physical progress to be reported, even if progress is Nil
o Likely date of completion to be regularly updated
-
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
AN
DH
RA
PR
AD
ESH
AR
UN
AC
HA
L P
RA
DES
H
ASS
AM
BIH
AR
CH
HA
TTIS
GA
RH
GO
A
GU
JAR
AT
HA
RYA
NA
HIM
AC
HA
L P
RA
DES
H
JAM
MU
& K
ASH
MIR
JHA
RK
HA
ND
KA
RN
ATA
KA
KER
ALA
MA
DH
YA P
RA
DES
H
MA
HA
RA
SHTR
A
MA
NIP
UR
MEG
HA
LAYA
MIZ
OR
AM
NA
GA
LAN
D
OD
ISH
A
PU
NJA
B
RA
JAST
HA
N
SIK
KIM
TAM
IL N
AD
U
TELA
NG
AN
A
TRIP
UR
A
UTT
AR
PR
AD
ESH
UTT
AR
AK
HA
ND
WES
T B
ENG
AL
Physical Progress based on Milestone for PWSS not mentioned (in %)
Work Order date not mentioned (in %)
SLSSC not mentioned (in %)
Geo-Tagging
Provision for Geo-Tagging assetsGeo-tagging:•To uniquely identify and locate physical objects in latitude-longitude using GPS enabled electronic device including smart mobile phones•To map all rural water supply assets (existing & to be commissioned) using the geo-tagged photographs to bring transparency / remove duplicity•Ministry / NIC has developed mobile application
Lat-Lon (GPS) location
Time Stamp
Geo-Tagging
87.13
71.0970.12
53.2849.8748.56 47.6
38.0934.1
29.6524.59
15.7914.0413.2413.1711.7810.926.94 5.82 5.75 4.88 2.79 1.34 1.27 0.26 0.26 0.16 0 0 0 0 0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Percentage of Approved Geotagged Photographs
Composite NRDWP Ranking of States- proposed to start from next yeat
Proposed Indicators:
Coverage
Laboratories
Monitoring
Financial
Sustainability of Schemes
Composite NRDWP Ranking of StatesIndicators Factors Unit Weightage Purpose
Coverage Fully Covered (FC) Habitations
Piped Water Supply (PWS) Population in FC habitations
Household Connection
% 15 To assess the availability
WQ Labs Lab Ranking done by the Ministry Score 10 To assess the quality
Monitoring Geo-tagging of assets
Entry of SLSSC date in IMIS
Entry of First Work Order date in IMIS
Entry of Milestone based physical progress of PWSS in
IMIS
% 20 To monitor Progress of
Ongoing Schemes
Financial Ratio of total Release under NWQSM to total Allocation
under NWQSM
Ratio of total expenditure under NWQSM to total
release under NWQSM
Ratio of Pre-finance amount to Notional allocation in
pre-finance.
Ratio 15% To access the ability to
utilize funds
Sustainability
of Schemes
Functionality status in Third Party Evaluation
O&M policy implementation / Collection of Water
Charges
O&M budget
% 40% Access the scheme’s
performance
sustainability
76.99
69.35 66.34 66.32 66.15 65.66 65.26
60.67 59.90 58.56 57.46
50.25 49.07 47.53
45.45
41.64
32.84 32.74
-
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Ranking of states – Non NE and Non Him
68.65 66.73
64.41
60.34 59.40
50.98 50.30 49.67 48.18 47.81 45.47
11.52 8.36
-
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
Ranking of states - NE and Him states
House hold Survey
House hold Survey:Around 18 % of rural household have connections;therefore a nationwide attempt is taken to re-affirm the data:
1. SBM directory is being used as base2. Attempt to capture private connection and scheme details3. States can take up this using support fund and their own resources.
o List of existing schemes in IMIS will be displayed (NRDWP and other schemes):
1
2
o Provision to add new scheme: State Government funded or any other
S.
No.
Name of the scheme Funded through :
Select : State Government /
PRI / other funds
Estimated cost of
the scheme in Cr.
Year of
commissioning
Type of scheme:
Select : PWS /Tube Well, Hand pump / Point
treatment system (CWPPs)
1
2
o Household data from SBM directory will displayed:
S.
No.
Family
Head Name
Father /
Husband
Name
Gender Category Card type Card
NumberDoes this
house exists
in the village
Availability of water tap within premises
(Household Connection)
1 Government
Connection
Private
Connection
Both Connection
2
o Data will be validated by :
1. Junior Engineer / Assistant Engineer, PHED, Panchayat Development Officer (PDO) & Sarpanch Gram Panchayat
Household Connections - Survey
Appendix
Balance liability– State wise : Non NE and Non Himalayan
S.No.
Non NE and Non
Himalayan State,
(Amount in Rs. Cr.)
Nos. of Schemes
Schemes
physically 100%
complete but
financially
incomplete
75 to < 100%
Physically
Completed
50 to < 75%
Physically
Completed
25 to < 50%
Physically
Completed
0 > to < 25%
Physically
Completed
0% Physically
Completed
Total Nos. Of
Schemes where %
of Physical
Progress not
updated
Nos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. Balance
1 Rajasthan 474 13,644 141 1,253 84 5,494 29 2,223 20 1,618 42 727 70 866 88 1,463
2 West Bengal 1,129 10,571 305 581 312 1,956 106 295 135 2,326 260 5,054 6 37 5 323
3 Maharashtra 7,526 3,409 1,473 579 1,963 856 1,044 497 469 215 106 53 1,430 756 1,041 452
4 Uttar Pradesh 1,876 2,827 586 232 467 625 217 301 130 246 39 69 194 507 243 847
5 Karnataka 6,123 2,720 2,431 594 647 430 382 817 545 267 286 437 45 15 1,787 160
6 Bihar 1,632 1,840 167 167 144 512 122 117 148 124 203 149 102 71 746 700
7 Telangana 1,119 1,750 239 313 782 1,105 35 200 7 25 11 39 3 3 42 64
8 Madhya Pradesh 2,396 1,467 210 211 217 144 214 114 457 299 1,164 651 11 2 123 45
9 Odisha 4,719 1,399 743 31 604 74 1,193 75 684 139 1,263 928 176 126 56 25
10 Kerala 322 1,334 48 145 65 150 24 98 28 284 32 265 118 255 7 136
11 Gujarat 149 1,253 48 127 16 295 15 514 17 12 11 25 30 46 12 234
12 Tamil Nadu 191 849 12 162 58 661 4 9 - - 99 13 - - 18 4
13 Haryana 952 774 318 175 118 88 84 56 102 85 234 176 6 5 90 189
14 Andhra Pradesh 1,727 718 886 226 118 42 64 51 323 217 191 47 18 4 127 131
15 Punjab 398 640 142 39 74 22 29 69 36 10 54 14 4 1 59 484
16 Jharkhand 2,553 626 1,223 53 490 213 160 53 146 21 274 187 185 22 75 77
17 Goa 2 134 - - 1 22 - - - - 1 112 - - - -
18 Chhattisgarh 917 97 356 9 187 12 91 10 63 12 137 30 2 0 81 23
Total 34,205 46,050 9,328 4,898 6,347 12,703 3,813 5,499 3,310 5,903 4,407 8,974 2,400 2,716 4,600 5,357
Balance liability – State wise : NE and Himalayan
S.No.
NE and
Himalayan
State, (Amount
in Rs. Cr.)
Nos. of
Schemes
Schemes
physically
100% complete
but financially
incomplete
75 to < 100%
Physically
Completed
50 to < 75%
Physically
Completed
25 to < 50%
Physically
Completed
0 > to < 25%
Physically
Completed
0% Physically
Completed
Total Nos. Of
Schemes where
% of Physical
Progress not
updated
Nos.Balanc
eNos.
Balanc
eNos.
Balanc
eNos.
Balanc
eNos.
Balanc
eNos.
Balanc
eNos.
Balanc
eNos.
Balanc
e
1 Assam 1,802 1,517 673 144 558 307 139 367 196 347 191 228 31 89 14 36
2 Himachal Pradesh 440 1,408 50 21 129 146 58 33 60 43 85 1,009 30 141 28 14
3 Jammu & Kashmir 1,153 1,082 289 89 217 139 298 326 261 421 51 94 34 10 3 2
4 Meghalaya 194 349 164 9 17 76 1 11 2 11 6 242 4 0 - -
5 Uttarakhand 470 271 198 19 86 88 29 43 37 45 31 24 1 0 88 52
6 Arunachal Pradesh 584 170 104 2 33 6 31 8 46 13 86 34 192 54 92 54
7 Manipur 496 74 186 (2) 42 2 48 6 90 23 97 34 6 0 27 11
8 Sikkim 124 64 9 - 4 1 6 15 - - 104 46 - - 1 2
9 Tripura 143 21 27 3 20 3 7 6 39 4 48 5 1 0 1 0
10 Mizoram 17 11 - - 5 1 5 3 7 7 - - - - - -
11 Nagaland 26 9 9 1 - - 4 3 - - 7 3 - - 6 3
Total 5,449 4,976 1,709 286 1,111 769 626 822 738 913 706 1,718 299 295 260 174
S.No
.GEOTAGGING
As on
(01/04/201
8)
PWS (MVS) PWS (SVS)Tubewell / HP / Well
etc.Recharge Structure
Point Treatment
SystemTotal(31/03/2019)
Nos. Of
Sources
And
Delivery
Point
Nos. Of
Approved
Geotagge
d
Photograp
hs
Nos. Of
Sources
And
Delivery
Point
Nos. Of
Approved
Geotagge
d
Photograp
hs
Nos. Of
Sources
And
Delivery
Point
Nos. Of
Approved
Geotagge
d
Photograp
hs
Nos. Of
Sources
And
Delivery
Point
Nos. Of
Approved
Geotagge
d
Photograp
hs
Nos. Of
Sources
And
Delivery
Point
Nos. Of
Approved
Geotagge
d
Photograp
hs
Nos. Of
Sources
And
Delivery
Point
Nos. Of
Approved
Geotagge
d
Photograp
hs
Percentag
e of
Approved
Geotagge
d
Photograp
hs
Total 19,55,404 15,24,569 17,804 23,39,509 59,642 61,20,641 1,81,104 24,744 352 6,015 196 90,04,174 22,14,555 24.59
1 Punjab 8,707 20,285 8,267 19,140 13,644 2,892 2,103 9 7 0 0 37,569 32,734 87.13
2 Madhya Pradesh 4,04,380 23,501 111 44,781 6,005 6,34,644 73,952 450 86 42 5 6,81,603 4,84,555 71.09
3 Tripura 52,176 18,964 2 44,358 66 16,577 102 0 0 5 0 74,648 52,346 70.12
4 Tamil Nadu 2,95,678 1,93,860 918 3,67,610 15,069 1,93,975 966 0 0 93 0 5,86,783 3,12,631 53.28
5 Manipur 1,166 5,979 1,302 8,694 3,358 198 82 1 0 0 0 11,851 5,910 49.87
6 Mizoram 1,476 2,225 147 4,939 1,174 61 7 0 0 0 0 5,774 2,804 48.56
7 Chhattisgarh 1,40,139 33,882 10 67,460 976 2,33,937 5,352 283 0 3,437 144 3,08,033 1,46,621 47.6
8 Andhra Pradesh 1,84,123 1,55,126 184 2,36,421 3,524 2,44,607 7,523 4,760 17 551 13 5,12,976 1,95,405 38.09
9 Jammu & Kashmir 5,058 14,758 2,230 5,779 1,183 8,906 1,888 0 0 0 0 30,381 10,359 34.1
10 Uttar Pradesh 6,91,730 33,624 715 56,217 546 24,01,150 47,105 4,016 81 81 30 24,96,164 7,40,208 29.65
11 Rajasthan 35,943 45,721 26 44,532 2 1,47,605 5 13 0 622 0 2,27,823 35,976 15.79
12 Maharashtra 6,015 77,816 480 1,54,795 8,826 74,437 19,937 82 0 90 0 2,51,178 35,259 14.04
13 Himachal Pradesh 17,098 82,500 279 34,395 544 18,762 444 2 0 0 0 1,38,709 18,365 13.24
14 Haryana 7,138 31,429 0 29,433 5 166 0 452 0 8 0 54,241 7,143 13.17
15 Jharkhand 40,494 20,193 7 28,237 254 4,00,595 10,664 2,190 161 1 0 4,37,711 51,580 11.78
16 Meghalaya 3,499 13,513 214 22,324 421 6,069 6 8 0 3 0 37,918 4,140 10.92
17 Karnataka 47,417 2,67,478 0 5,67,733 49 1,03,553 1 47 0 212 0 6,84,199 47,467 6.94
18 Assam 3,546 51,203 2,778 36,591 3,583 1,63,935 4,604 0 0 31 3 2,49,298 14,520 5.82
19 Sikkim 434 3,974 0 7,382 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 7,553 434 5.75
20 Nagaland 479 3,558 0 9,678 1 11 0 6 0 10 0 9,834 480 4.88
21 Bihar 5,134 5,694 70 8,490 203 3,99,946 6,101 82 0 19 1 4,13,157 11,509 2.79
22 Arunachal Pradesh 14 7,493 3 20,070 144 978 130 124 0 1 0 21,722 291 1.34
23 Gujarat 2,484 97,904 0 1,61,587 0 10,321 0 6 0 230 0 1,95,656 2,484 1.27
24 Uttarakhand 157 45,987 26 47,019 37 2,803 0 0 0 1 0 85,874 220 0.26
25 West Bengal 889 43,949 25 5,245 1 3,44,969 113 0 0 159 0 3,97,534 1,028 0.26
26 Kerala 26 26,779 10 14,036 27 500 0 2 0 16 0 40,339 63 0.16
27 Andaman & Nicobar 0 471 0 462 0 115 0 0 0 0 0 904 0 0
28 Goa 0 204 0 340 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 427 0 0
29 Odisha 4 35,090 0 54,873 0 4,67,037 0 1 0 117 0 5,36,322 4 0
30 Puducherry 0 290 0 503 0 148 0 0 0 0 0 792 0 0
31 Telangana 0 1,61,119 0 2,36,385 0 2,41,740 19 12,210 0 286 0 4,67,201 19 0
Ranking of states – Non NE and Non HimState Fully
Covered
Habitation
s
PWS
Population
residing in
Fully
Covered
Habitation
s
Household
Connection
Lab
scoreMonitoring-Geotagging
Monitoring-SLSSC
Monitoring-Work order
Monitoring-Milestone based physical progress
Budget -(Total-NWQSM Release)/ (Total -NWQSM allocation)
Budget -(Total-NWQSM expenditure)/(Total -NWQSM release)
Budget-Prefinance Amount / Notional Allocation in Prefinance
Sustainability-Third party survey result
Sustainability-O&M policy implementation
Sustainability-O&M budget
Ranking marks
unit % % % marks % % % % % % % % % %
weightage 5.00 5.00 5.00 10 10 2.5 2.5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 30 5 5 100.00
max 5.00 5.00 3.95 10.00 10.00 2.48 2.48 4.73 5.00 5.00 5.00 29.43 - - 76.99
min 1.41 - - - - 0.87 0.97 1.40 1.70 1.98 - 7.82 - - 32.74
average 3.94 2.47 1.18 4.58 2.49 1.86 1.92 3.27 3.83 4.15 3.53 23.02 56.23
PUNJAB 3.50 3.67 2.61 6.77 10.00 2.13 2.20 4.34 2.67 5.00 5.00 29.09 76.99
TAMIL NADU 4.80 5.00 1.50 6.69 6.12 1.57 1.57 3.10 3.64 3.68 5.00 26.70 69.35
ANDHRA PRADESH 3.58 3.36 1.69 4.91 4.37 1.89 2.03 3.91 5.00 1.98 5.00 28.61 66.34
HARYANA 4.85 4.97 2.69 7.50 1.51 2.23 2.25 4.48 5.00 5.00 5.00 20.83 66.32
MADHYA PRADESH 4.99 2.14 0.58 5.23 8.15 2.08 2.25 3.79 4.74 4.80 5.00 22.39 66.15
TELANGANA 3.11 3.05 1.68 6.15 - 2.30 2.38 4.09 5.00 3.99 5.00 28.92 65.66
GUJARAT 5.00 4.99 3.95 6.34 0.15 1.49 1.70 2.85 5.00 4.78 5.00 24.02 65.26
WEST BENGAL 2.68 1.26 0.05 6.67 0.03 2.48 2.48 4.73 4.98 2.90 5.00 27.42 60.67
KERALA 1.41 1.38 0.84 5.38 0.02 2.04 1.80 2.66 5.00 4.94 5.00 29.43 59.90
ODISHA 4.92 2.38 0.19 10.00 - 2.25 2.24 2.05 2.67 5.00 2.87 24.00 58.56
UTTAR PRADESH 4.93 0.77 0.03 6.38 3.36 1.41 1.64 2.76 4.66 4.50 5.00 22.02 57.46
CHATTISGARH 4.89 1.86 0.44 0.44 5.45 1.96 2.04 4.00 2.67 3.61 - 22.89 50.25
KARNATAKA 2.12 2.78 2.17 - 0.80 1.80 1.95 3.30 3.67 5.00 5.00 20.49 49.07
MAHARASHTRA 4.49 3.65 1.92 - 1.49 1.78 1.64 2.42 2.67 2.63 - 24.83 47.53
RAJASTHAN 2.45 1.53 0.62 - 1.81 1.93 1.88 3.02 5.00 4.44 5.00 17.77 45.45
GOA 4.97 - - - - 1.25 1.25 2.50 2.67 5.00 - 24.00 41.64
JHARKHAND 4.97 1.33 0.29 2.03 1.30 2.00 2.23 3.51 1.70 5.00 0.65 7.82 32.84
BIHAR 3.20 0.34 0.07 7.91 0.28 0.87 0.97 1.40 2.16 2.39 - 13.15 32.74
Ranking of states – NE and HimState Fully
Covered
Habitation
s
PWS
Population
residing in
Fully
Covered
Habitation
s
Household
Connection
Lab
scoreMonitoring-Geotagging
Monitoring-SLSSC
Monitoring-Work order
Monitoring-Milestone based physical progress
Budget -(Total-NWQSM Release)/ (Total -NWQSM allocation)
Budget -(Total-NWQSM expenditure)/(Total -NWQSM release)
Budget-Prefinance Amount / Notional Allocation in Prefinance
Sustainability-Third party survey result
Sustainability-O&M policy implementation
Sustainability-O&M budget
Ranking marks
unit % % % marks % % % % % % % % % %
weightage 5.00 5.00 5.00 10 10 2.5 2.5 5 5.00 5.00 5.00 30 5 5 100.00 max 4.05 4.29 5.00 5.35 8.05 2.50 2.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 30.00 - - 68.65 min 2.00 1.72 0.05 - - - - - - - - - - - 8.36 average 2.96 2.89 1.17 1.47 2.15 1.86 1.88 3.45 3.75 3.46 3.26 20.31 48.60 MIZORAM 3.39 3.52 0.76 0.44 5.55 2.50 2.50 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 30.00 68.65 HIMACHAL PRADESH 4.05 4.17 2.89 4.65 1.52 2.01 2.00 3.54 5.00 3.58 5.00 28.33 66.73 SIKKIM 2.00 1.88 5.00 - 0.66 2.48 2.48 4.92 5.00 5.00 5.00 30.00 64.41 TRIPURA 2.84 2.91 0.13 4.80 8.05 2.32 2.32 4.41 3.67 5.00 5.00 18.89 60.34 MANIPUR 3.60 3.87 0.27 3.93 5.60 2.28 2.28 4.55 5.00 5.00 5.00 18.00 59.40 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 2.99 3.14 1.56 - 3.91 2.41 2.43 4.70 3.67 2.95 2.39 20.82 50.98 UTTARAKHAND 2.90 2.25 0.71 - 0.03 2.07 2.11 4.06 5.00 2.94 5.00 23.24 50.30 NAGALAND 2.53 2.92 0.25 - 0.56 1.94 1.94 3.52 2.67 5.00 - 28.33 49.67 ASSAM 3.13 1.72 0.11 5.35 0.66 2.33 2.43 4.67 1.07 5.00 - 21.71 48.18 MEGHALAYA 2.00 1.82 0.05 - 1.20 2.42 2.47 3.13 5.00 2.70 5.00 22.03 47.81 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 2.13 2.14 0.44 - 0.15 1.35 1.46 2.30 5.00 2.78 5.00 22.71 45.47 ANDAMAN and NICOBAR 4.05 4.29 0.51 - - - - - 2.67 - - - 11.52 PUDUCHERRY 2.88 2.95 2.53 - - - - - - - - - 8.36
Ongoing Schemes – Liability (Rs. Cr.) and suspense account
S. No. Non NE / Non Him States
All Ongoing
Presently in C-39
Going in
SuspenseLive Ongoing
S. No. NE / Him States
All Ongoing
Presently in C-39Going in Suspense Live Ongoing
Nos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. BalanceNos. Balance Nos. Balance Nos. Balance
1 RAJASTHAN 474 13,644 67 1,972 407 11,672 1 ASSAM 1,802 1,517 954 408 848 1,109
2 WEST BENGAL 1,129 10,571 166 326 963 10,245 2 HIMACHAL PRADESH 440 1,408 160 1,011 280 397
3 MAHARASHTRA 7,526 3,409 5,291 2,741 2,235 667 3 JAMMU & KASHMIR 1,153 1,082 942 870 211 212
4 UTTAR PRADESH 1,876 2,827 43 72 1,833 2,755 4 MEGHALAYA 194 349 167 347 27 1
5 KARNATAKA 6,123 2,720 879 708 5,244 2,012 5 UTTARAKHAND 470 271 38 66 432 205
6 BIHAR 1,632 1,840 110 97 1,522 1,742 6 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 584 170 171 66 413 105
7 TELANGANA 1,119 1,750 222 985 897 765 7 MANIPUR 496 74 104 (2) 392 75
8 MADHYA PRADESH 2,396 1,467 83 111 2,313 1,355 8 SIKKIM 124 64 1 5 123 59
9 ODISHA 4,719 1,399 584 414 4,135 985 9 TRIPURA 143 21 53 4 90 17
10 KERALA 322 1,334 229 743 93 591 10 MIZORAM 17 11 - - 17 11
11 GUJARAT 149 1,253 40 130 109 1,123 11 NAGALAND 26 9 - - 26 9
12 TAMIL NADU 191 849 9
251 182 598 12 ANDAMAN & NICOBAR - - - - - -
13 HARYANA 952 774 212 146 740 628 13 PUDUCHERRY - - - - - -
14 ANDHRA PRADESH 1,727 718 161 361 1,566 357 Total 5,449 4,976 2,590 2,776 2,859 2,200
15 PUNJAB 398 640 9
3 389 636
16 JHARKHAND 2,553 626 143 34 2,410 592
17 GOA 2 134 2
134 - -
18 CHHATTISGARH 917 97 18 3 899 95
Total 34,205 46,050 8,268 9,232 25,937 36,819
Unspent Balance – Coverage (Amount Rs. Cr.)
S.No. State Coverage S.No. State Coverage
1 MAHARASHTRA 365.25 1 JAMMU & KASHMIR 124.83
2 RAJASTHAN 224.3 2 ASSAM 72.39
3 WEST BENGAL 178.48 3 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 52.92
4 ANDHRA PRADESH 116.85 4 UTTARAKHAND 43.39
5 BIHAR 109.22 5 TRIPURA 39.93
6 KARNATAKA 85.88 6 HIMACHAL PRADESH 24.25
7 UTTAR PRADESH 68.1 7 MEGHALAYA 22.93
8 TELANGANA 67.08 8 MANIPUR 16.49
9 CHHATTISGARH 39.97 9 MIZORAM 12.25
10 TAMIL NADU 33.07 10 SIKKIM 5.08
11 JHARKHAND 22.56 11 ANDAMAN & NICOBAR 1.36
12 ODISHA 21.17 12 PUDUCHERRY 1.27
13 MADHYA PRADESH 17.19 13 NAGALAND 0
14 HARYANA 15.13 Total 417.09
15 GUJARAT 9.98
16 KERALA 1.03
17 GOA 0.3
18 PUNJAB 0
Total 1,375.56
Evaluation of Innovative Technologies – Revamped procedure
Water Division
Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation
Background
Constituted on 10.9.2014
Objective
identify, evaluate and empanel besttechnologies
classify them
Ultimately linked to achieving SwachhBharat by 2019
A 18 member committee
Representation from Academia, ResearchInstitutions, Industry, Government
Journey so far
Eleven meetings held so far
Technologies received – 271, Water –167, Sanitation – 104
After internal scrutiny by Ministry,technologies placed before thecommittee.
Wide range of areas – mentioned in thenote para 2.2
Classification of technologiesCategory What it means
I Technology approved/ recommended
II In principle cleared; but, some more information required
III Existing proven technology
IV Technology not recommended.
Sl.
No.
Subject Total
Techno-
logies
received
Category
I
Category
II
Category
III
Category
IV*
1 Water 167 38 4 25 100
2 Sanitation 104 15 2 21 66
Total 271 53 6 46 166
*Category-IV includes duplicate applications
Swajal
Programme, Progress and Points to Ponder
Community owned Source sustainability Community driven O&M
Strengthening of Institutions
Use of TechnologyGrassroot
Innovations
SWAJAL FUNDAMENTALS
Providing Safe Piped Water Supply to Households
SWAJAL IN ASPIRATIONAL DISTRICTS
Only 24.46% Piped Water Supply Coverage
in Aspirational Districts habitations
44.4% of India’s habitations covered
with Piped Water Supply
State-wise Aspirational DistrictsState Districts State Districts
Andhra Pradesh 3 Manipur 1
Arunachal Pradesh
1 Meghalaya 1
Assam 7 Mizoram 1
Bihar 13 Nagaland 1
Chhattisgarh 10 Odisha 10
Gujarat 2 Punjab 2
Himachal Pradesh 1 Rajasthan 5
Haryana 1 Sikkim 1
J&K 2 Tamilnadu 2
Jharkhand 19 Telangana 3
Karnataka 2 Tripura 1
Kerala 1 Uttar Pradesh 8
Madhya Pradesh 8 Uttarakhand 2
Maharashtra 4
Total 74 38
112 Districts in 27 States
Swajal – A customised small PWS
Most Aspirational Districts endowed withgroundwater.
Surface and springs based schemes eligible
Even 10 household habitations can be taken up –suitable for small tribal communities
Wide cost variation - up to Rs 50 lakhs perscheme allowed
Habitations with iron contamination can also betaken up
No power costs and almost maintenance free.
Inbuilt community participation and O&M
MODEL SWAJAL UNITMODEL SWAJAL UNIT
Swajal Project Cycle
• GP/Village/Habitation selected
• Contribution Accounts opened
• Key Functionaries oriented
Pre-planning
• Community selecting options through a participatory planning process
• Detailed project report based on informed choice by community
Planning
• Community involvement in social audit of scheme implementation
• Barefoot technician trainings
Implementation
• Scheme implemented as per DPR and handed over to community.
• O&M managed by community
O and M and Exit
GRASS ROOT INNOVATIONS
• Pre Fab/ Pre Cast Structures-Can be installed in a day
• Dual Pump- Existing Hand Pump Used
• Theft Prevention- Solar Panel on Top, Anti theft Bolting
• Purification- Attached Chlorinator/UV System
• RMS- Remote Monitoring System
Brief Programme Guideline contents Challenge mode –intra State competition Advisory guidelines – ease of implementation No compromises on community participation O&M funds
and takeover No per-capita cost ceiling Flexible financial scaling few lakhs to Rs 50 lakhs (less than
cost of a 2 BHK house) Completion period six months to one year Inbuilt
Scheme sustainability through financial and source sustainability
Community empowerment through information sharing using IT
Swajal Management by Community
Location of source Location and number of stand
posts Carry out social audit Pay for O&M in full (GP +
Community) Pay the Jal Prerak for daily
regulation Take over assets
SWAJAL ELABORATE FINANCIAL ASPECTS
Advisory to States for accessing under NRDWP ‘Flexi Funds”component
This is to be up to 5% out of overall allocation (both centraland state share put together).
Individual scheme estimated cost up to 50 lakhs -dependingon topography and to address quality issues
Access to credit for household connections for individuals –States to arrange
Funding pattern NE and Himalayan States 81:09:10 (Centre:State:GP)
Other States 45:45:10 (Centre:State:GP)
Capacity building under Swajal
First time training programme of this scale
Five Training of Trainers (ToTs) programmecompleted
Bhopal, Pune, Ranchi, Raipur, Guwahati and Vadadora
311 Trainees trained
21 States covered
Officers/Officials from 83 districts participated
South Zone to be covered in February 2019
Journey so far
Initial guidelines issued for six pilot States in March2018
Up-scaled to all aspirational districts in April 2018 Revised guidelines issued on 31.8.2018 Six ToT trainings completed – 311 personnel trained
(September to November) First Swajal Scheme Foundation stone laid by Hon’ble
Vice President at Jharkhand on 27.9.2018 First Swajal Scheme inaugurated on 19th November,
2018 on World Toilet Day 2462 schemes already identified
Schemes identified so far
S.No. State Name Number of Schemes
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 301
2 CHHATTISGARH 137
3 GUJARAT 58
4 JHARKHAND 1251
5 MADHYA PRADESH 7
6 MAHARASHTRA 157
7 ODISHA 518
8 RAJASTHAN 1
9 UTTAR PRADESH 32
TOTAL 2462
Major Concerns
Lack of enthusiasm by States
States not aware of the major revision made i.e.schemes can be taken up in safe blocks and in allother blocks in aspirational districts.
Beneficiaries of this revision - Punjab, Rajasthanand Haryana.
Only 9 States have identified schemes
96% identified schemes only in 5 States(Jharkhand, Odisha, AP, Chhattisgarh andMaharashtra)
Swajal progress entry in IMIS is lagging behind
Sr. No State
Assigned Districts by NITI Aayog
1Andhra Pradesh Vishakhapatnam2
AssamDarrang
3 Barpeta4
ChhattisgarhKorba
5 Kanker6 Mahasamund7
JharkhandPakur
8 Sahibganj9
Madhya Pradesh
Badwani10 Khandwa11 Singrauli12 Damoh13 Vidisha14
MaharashtraOsmanabad
15 Nandurbar16Uttarakhand Udhamsinagar
Development Partner and Districts assigned
Piramal Group has signed a Statement of Intent with NITI Aayog to assist States in aspirational districts
Sl. No State No. UNICEF District
1Andhra Pradesh 1Kadapa2Vizianagaram
2Assam 3Dhubri
4Sitamarhi3Chhattisgarh 5Bastar
6Dantewda7Rajnandgaon
4Gujarat 8Dahod5Jharkhand 9Bokaro
10Chatra
11Giridih12Godda13Lohardaga
14Palamau15Ramgarh16Ranchi17Simdega18West Singhbhum
6Karnataka 19Raichur7Madhya Pradesh 20Chhatarpur
21Guna8Maharashtra 22Gadchiroli9Odisha 23Dhenkanal
24Gajapati25Nuapada
10Rajasthan 26Karauli11Tamilnadu 27Ramanadhapuram
28Virudhanagar12Uttar Pradesh 29Chitrakoot
Way Forward
Participatory Rural Appraisal is indispensable under Swajal
Use the development partners – UNICEF, Piramal and Tata Trusts at district level.
Entry of scheme progress details in IMIS is mandatory
States to take up more schemes - Only coverage component where new scheme is allowed to be taken up.
Ministry is coming out with Training modules for Sarpanches
How to identify village? Canwe take up habitation?
Village/GP located in any ofthe blocks with no PWSscheme and preferably ODF.
Yes. Individual habitationscan be taken up withminimum of 10households. In fact, Statescan adopt a saturation modeand cover all habitations in avillage.
Swajal FAQs
What are the mandatorycomponents?
Bore/tube well withcasing
Pump with dry run sensor
Pipes
Standposts
Recharge structure
Soak pit
Infra for schools andanganwadis
Customer Care Centre
Swajal FAQs
What are the componentswhere alternatives/alternative materialsare allowed?
Solar panel or electricity
Mounting structure (steelor concrete)
Storage structure (PVC orothers)
Stand-post to householdconnection -Infrastructure funding byGP
Swajal FAQs
What are the optionalcomponents?
Community watertreatment plant
Online chlorination
LED light for waterdrawl at night
Cattle troughs
Washing clothes
Mobile chargers
Sensors for discharge
Lightning conductor
Swajal FAQs
What is funding pattern?(Centre: State: GP)North Eastern States andHimalayan States81:09:10Other States 45:45:10
10% funding can fromany of the followingsources (i) GP funds (ii)MP/MLA LAD funds (iii)CSR funds (iv) DistrictMineral Fund (v)Community Contribution
Swajal FAQs
Swajal FAQs Model O&M Calculation(All figures in INR) for illustration purpose only
Assumptions madeMonthly charges for maintenance personnel Rs 500 x 12 = 6,000
No. of households in the habitation 30
Annual maintenance of the drinking water system@2% of estimated cost (for solar based system)
Cap on per year contribution by individual household as decided by the State for contribution to three year O&M pool of funds 200
Payment to be made by a household for three years 3 x 200 600Annual O&M cost for scheme with an estimated cost say Rs 5 lakhsMonthly payment to bare foot technician, say, @Rs 500/- 6, 000Maintenance of panel, pump, pipelineand other accessories @2% of the capital cost 10,000Total 16,000Three year O&M pool cost 48,000Three year O&M pool Cost to be met by the community (600 x 30) 18,000
Cost to be met by GP 30,000
The village community isunwilling to pay for threeyear O&M pool cost andwilling only for one or twoyears. What should be done?The concerned GP has to payfor creating the three yearO&M pool cost.Willing communities
Can a state adopt a 5 yearO&M pool instead of 3years?Yes. Three years is theminimum period.
Swajal FAQs O&M
Question and Answer and
Suggestion time
Agenda – Water Quality
1. National Water Quality Sub-missiona) Left out habitationsb) Unspent Balancec) Action Points to States
2. Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillancea) Expenditure 2018-19b) Water Quality Testing Labs
i. Lab Rankingii. Sample Collection
3. Uniform Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Protocol-2019
4. Revamp of High Level Technical Committee
NWQSM: State-wise left-out habitations as on 24.01.2019S.No. State Name Left out habitations
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 58
2 ASSAM 1421
3 BIHAR 241
4 CHHATTISGARH 18
5 HARYANA 39
6 JHARKHAND 115
7 KARNATAKA 60
8 KERALA 25
9 MADHYA PRADESH 02
10 MAHARASHTRA 21
11 ODISHA 35
12 PUNJAB 265
13 RAJASTHAN 1969
14 TELANGANA 0
15 UTTAR PRADESH 159
16 WEST BENGAL 2453Total 6881
• States are advised to get theleft-out habitations re-testedfor the presence chemicalcontamination in NABLaccredited labs.
NWQSM: State-wise Unspent Balance as on 24.01.2019S. No State Name Unspent Balance(cr.)
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 25.742 ASSAM 294.983 BIHAR 147.314 CHHATTISGARH 0.95 HARYANA 7.286 JHARKHAND 31.477 KARNATAKA 25.918 KERALA 4.439 MADHYA PRADESH 1.26
10 MAHARASHTRA 16.6211 ODISHA 0.0112 PUNJAB 98.0113 RAJASTHAN 379.9614 TELANGANA 3.815 UTTAR PRADESH 24.9616 WEST BENGAL 778.41
Total 1841.05
• NWQSM funds can be used inconvergence with other fundsi.e. the funds can be in externalaided projects/State schemesto the extent of eligibility.
• State are to provideexpenditure plan for utilizingunspent balance in AAP.
National Water Quality Sub-Mission (NWQSM)Action Points for States
All States requested to submit proposals for left-outhabitation on or before 31st January, 2019. Noproposal will be considered beyond the cut off date.
NWQSM has sunset clause i.e. to be completed byMarch, 2021.
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS)Expenditure 2018-19
S. No State
Notional Availability = OB
+ Full Central Allocation
However this will vary as
per the Release In Cr.
Current Availability for the year =
1/18 of expenditure on Hardware
on Coverage In Cr
Expenditure in Cr.Percentage Of
Expenditure
1 MIZORAM 48.31 1.72 1.71 99.56
2 ANDHRA PRADESH 197.99 3.38 3.23 95.65
3 ASSAM 503.5 4.92 4.58 93.14
4 WEST BENGAL 424.48 11.11 10.2 91.77
5 CHHATTISGARH 121.36 1.75 1.21 69.19
… ... … … … …
26 PUDUCHERRY 2.56 0 0 0
27 MANIPUR 67.62 2.66 0 0
28 KARNATAKA 489.63 15.77 0 0
29 ANDAMAN & NICOBAR 1.68 0 0 0
30 BIHAR 341.52 1.3 0 0
States are requested to utilize full available funding under this component as this reflects in the health of the laboratories.
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS)Water Quality Testing Labs
• Lab Ranking• To encourage competitiveness, greater ownership,
improve the quality and strengthen labs functioning.• 40% weightage to infrastructure & AMC and 60%
weightage for performance based indicators.
• Sample Collection• 75% of tests are to be conducted based on roster
and for remaining 25% flexibility is given to States.
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS)Lab Ranking - States
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS)Lab Ranking – Districts
UDWP-2019• To address emerging contaminants, include technological
enhancements and reforms in procurements the existingProtocol is revised.
• Main Features Flexibility
Regional labs can be set up; can outsource labs
Outcome Oriented
Robust ProceduresRoster based sample collection/testing
Geo-tagging of all sources
AMC/CAMC of instruments/equipment
NABL accreditation as per IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017
Cross verification of test results and 3rd Party verification of labs
Revamp of High Level Technical Committee
•Composition of Committee – top technical institutions
•Rigorous 360 degree process introduced • First Stage – field evaluation of technology by NEERI• Second Stage – reports by user States • Third State – Appraisal by the Committee
ASSURED Matrix
• Coined by the Chairman Dr. RA Mashelkar of HLTC
A – Affordability
S – Scalability
S – Sustainability
U – Universality
R – Rapid
E – Excellence
D – Distinctive
• Assured matrix framework
THANKS
Agenda – Water Quality
1. National Water Quality Sub-missiona) Left out habitationsb) Unspent Balancec) Revised Guidelines, Jan-2019, modificationsd) Sunset Clause
2. JE/AES Status of Expenditure
3. WQMS- Lab Ranking / Uniform Drinking Water Quality Monitoring Protocol
4. Jalmani
5. NGT Case OA 156/2015
6. Lab Ranking
7. Roster for sampling
8. UDWP
State-wise left-out habitations as on 24.01.2019
State Name
Nos. of Habs as on
18/08/2016 Habs Covered
YDU (Marked as non-quality)
Habs Being Covered
Proposal received for
Habs
Left out habitations as
on 24-Jan-2019ANDHRA PRADESH 421 244 71 48 - 58ASSAM 3881 297 169 1994 - 1421BIHAR 2120 250 696 529 404 241CHHATTISGARH 75 13 25 18 1 18HARYANA 245 21 121 64 39JHARKHAND 1128 176 763 74 - 115KARNATAKA 1059 795 71 133 - 60KERALA 73 34 7 7 - 25MADHYA PRADESH 136 105 9 0 20 02MAHARASHTRA 100 39 15 25 - 21ODISHA 65 22 3 5 - 35PUNJAB 777 198 38 202 74 265RAJASTHAN 6849 2404 614 1845 17 1969TELANGANA 1041 1040 1 0 - 0UTTAR PRADESH 462 103 1 127 72 159WEST BENGAL 9112 2750 915 2560 434 2453
Total 27544 8491 3519 7631 1022 6881
State-wise Unspent Balance as on 24.01.2019 (Rs. in Cr.)
S. No State Name NWQSM Release NWQSM Expenditure Unspent Balance1 ANDHRA PRADESH 25.74 0 25.742 ASSAM 330.96 35.98 294.983 BIHAR 171.96 24.65 147.314 CHHATTISGARH 0.92 0.02 0.95 HARYANA 16.91 (*) 7.63 9.286 JHARKHAND 38.72 7.25 31.477 KARNATAKA 26.99 1.08 25.918 KERALA 4.43 0 4.439 MADHYA PRADESH 4.41 3.15 1.26
10 MAHARASHTRA 18.79 2.17 16.6211 ODISHA 1.12 1.11 0.0112 PUNJAB 98.01 0 98.0113 RAJASTHAN 895.5 515.54 379.9614 TELANGANA 700.23 696.43 3.815 UTTAR PRADESH 49.95 24.99 24.9616 WEST BENGAL 1305.7 527.29 778.41
Total 3690.34 1847.29 1843.05
(*): State has returned Rs. 2Cr.
Revised Guidelines of NWQSM, Jan-2019Modifications
Schemes Related Modifications
oCluster based Community Water Purification Plants
oExtension of Pipelines from Existing Schemes
oCanal based / Ranney Well based schemes
oRetrofitting PWS with Community Water Purification Systems
Funding Related Modifications
oKitty based releases
oFor En-route Habitations NRDWP funds may be utilized.
oNWQSM funds can be used in convergence with other funds. Assuch, NWQSM funds can be utilized for covering affectedhabitations in external aided projects/State schemes to the extentof eligibility.
Revised Guidelines of NWQSM, Jan-2019Sunset Clause
National Water Quality Sub-Mission will come to end on31st March, 2021. Accordingly, all the habitations left-out and incomplete NWQSM Schemes will be State’sresponsibility after 31st March, 2021.
States have to submit commitment letter before31.01.2019 that all the left-out habitations /incomplete NWQSM schemes after 31.03.2021 if anywill be State’s responsibility.
National Water Quality Sub-Mission (NWQSM)
Action Points for States:
All States requested to submit proposals for left-outhabitation on or before 31st January, 2019.
No proposal will be considered beyond the cut offdate.
States have to submit commitment letter before31.01.2019 that State will take responsibility of all theleft-out habitations / incomplete NWQSM schemes after31.03.2021
Japanese Encephalitis- Acute Encephalitis Syndrome
Following activities are allowed in JE/AES affected districts.
o IEC Activities
o Conversion of shallow hand pump to India Mark-II or higher version
o Solid Liquid Waste Management activities
o Conducting Sanitary Survey
o Installation of energized stand post.
o Raising of hand pump platform.
o Construction of Soak pits
Under NRDWP,
o States are allowed to take new PWS schemes in JE-AES affected districts.
o Irrespective of physical progress, States are allowed spend funds on the scheme whichare in JE-AES affected districts.
o States are allowed to take new hand pumps (India Mark-II and above) schemes in JE-AES affected districts using JE-AES fund.
JE/AES Expenditure status as on 24.01.2019
(Rs. in Cr.)
S. No. State OBCentral
AllocationCentral Release
Central Expenditure
Closing balance
1 ASSAM 0.07 1.71 0 0 0.07
2 BIHAR 5.57 7.74 3.87 0 9.44
3 TAMIL NADU 0 5.42 2.71 0 2.71
4 UTTAR PRADESH 4.44 121.05 121.05 63.56 61.93
5 WEST BENGAL 0.15 4.08 2.04 2.19 0
Total 10.2 140 129.67 65.75 74.15
Note : All states are requested to update activities carried out in JE-AES
affected districts in IMIS Format C-48
Japanese Encephalitis- Acute Encephalitis Syndrome
Survey :oPre-monsoon survey is to be conducted in April – May month
oPost monsoon survey is to be conducted in November-December month
JE-AES Survey sample collection roster has been prepared and all affected states are requested to carry survey in these identified sources only.
Water Quality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS)
States can utilize up to 5% of funds released to them underNational Rural Drinking Water Programme (NRDWP) for WaterQuality Monitoring and Surveillance (WQMS).
Which includes testing of drinking water sources, upgrading ofexisting water quality testing laboratories and setting up of newState / district / sub-district / mobile water quality testinglaboratories, providing chemicals and consumables tolaboratories, providing field test kits/refills to Gram Panchayatsetc.
WQMS: Expenditure 2018-19
S. No State
Notional Availability = OB
+ Full Central Allocation
However this will vary as
per the Release In Cr.
Current Availability for the year =
1/18 of expenditure on Hardware
on Coverage In Cr
Expenditure in Cr.Percentage Of
Expenditure
1 MIZORAM 48.31 1.72 1.71 99.56
2 ANDHRA PRADESH 197.99 3.38 3.23 95.65
3 ASSAM 503.5 4.92 4.58 93.14
4 WEST BENGAL 424.48 11.11 10.2 91.77
5 CHHATTISGARH 121.36 1.75 1.21 69.19
6 UTTARAKHAND 104.17 2.67 1.58 59
7 TELANGANA 165.76 4.91 2.85 57.97
8 SIKKIM 22.47 0.88 0.48 54.89
9 JHARKHAND 179.73 3.86 2.11 54.82
10 UTTAR PRADESH 518.26 14.52 7.96 54.81
11 JAMMU & KASHMIR 346.85 6.3 3.31 52.58
12 MADHYA PRADESH 280.49 12.05 5.53 45.89
13 NAGALAND 34.72 0.78 0.35 44.57
14HIMACHAL
PRADESH91.12 3 1.3 43.24
15 KERALA 88.28 4.37 1.82 41.67
WQMS: Expenditure 2018-19
S. No State
Notional Availability = OB
+ Full Central Allocation
However this will vary as
per the Release In Cr.
Current Availability for the year =
1/18 of expenditure on Hardware
on Coverage In Cr
Expenditure in Cr.Percentage Of
Expenditure
16 PUNJAB 124.25 3.8 1.57 41.43
17 HARYANA 96.99 4.06 1.61 39.63
18 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 109.49 2.58 0.98 37.83
19 MEGHALAYA 52.78 1.24 0.33 26.3
20 TRIPURA 103.75 1.73 0.45 26.29
21 MAHARASHTRA 724.17 5.46 1.37 25.15
22 GUJARAT 238.24 11.73 2.25 19.18
23 TAMIL NADU 176.25 4.89 0.86 17.65
24 ODISHA 196.73 5.07 0.85 16.87
25 RAJASTHAN 749.99 21.72 0.72 3.31
26 PUDUCHERRY 2.56 0 0 0
27 MANIPUR 67.62 2.66 0 0
28 KARNATAKA 489.63 15.77 0 0
29 ANDAMAN & NICOBAR 1.68 0 0 0
30 BIHAR 341.52 1.3 0 0
S. No. Name of State/UTSanctioned
Amount (lakhs)
Amount Utilized(lakhs)
Unspent Amount (lakhs)
Present Status
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 1,923.45 194.31 1,729.14 UC Not received.
2ARUNACHAL PRADESH
52.66 52.66 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
3 ASSAM 1409.64 1144.89 264.75UC received for utilized funds. Balance fund awaited
4 BIHAR 766.16 608.13 158.03 UC Not received.
5 CHHATTISGARH 192.74 131.08 61.65 UC & Unspent Balance received.
6 GOA 8.75 8.73 0.0231
UC received for utilized funds of Rs. 8.73 lakhs and the unspent balance of Rs. 0.0231 lakhs has been received. Details of interest on unspent balance are awaited.
7 GUJARAT 1765.96 1404.78 361.18UC received for utilized funds. Balance Amount Awaited
8 HARYANA 174.57 262.69 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
9 HIMACHAL PRADESH 749.05 749.05 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
10 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 435.92 85.09 350.83 UC Not received.
Jalmani -(CAG Audit Para)
Jalmani...Continued- (CAG Audit Para)
S.No. Name of State/UTSanctioned
Amount (lakhs)
Amount Utilized(lakhs)
Unspent Amount (lakhs)
Present Status
11 JHARKHAND 250.59 119.28 131.31UC received for utilized funds refunding unspent amount but interest for the balance fund is still awaited.
12 KARNATAKA 1,228.40 1,228.40 0 UC Received
13 KERALA 256.4 25.04 231.36 UC Not received.
14 MADHYA PRADESH 546.87 546.05 0.82UC received for utilized funds. Govt. of MP has stated that they will be adjusting this amount against upcoming grants from Central Govt.
15 MAHARASHTRA 1,669.64 1,063.74 605.9UC/Unspent Balance received in Jan, 2019. State has been requested to confirm the details of unspent balance.
16 MANIPUR 110.24 110.24 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
17 MEGHALAYA 183.83 177.43 6.4UC received for utilized funds and balance fund is returned.
18 MIZORAM 196.64 196.64 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
19 NAGALAND 99.18 99.18 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
20 ORISSA 692.16 622.81 69.35UC received for utilized funds stating that Unutilized amount of 69.35 was refunded, however, it is yet to be ascertained by Govt. of Orissa.
Jalmani...Continued- (CAG Audit Para)
S.No.Name of State/UT
Sanctioned Amount (lakhs)
Amount Utilized(lakhs)
Unspent Amount (lakhs)
Present Status
21 PUNJAB 544.49 544.492 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
22 RAJASTHAN 688.66 99.03 589.63UC received for utilized funds. Balance fund awaited
23 SIKKIM 87.89 53.48 34.41 UC Not received.
24 TAMIL NADU 1,699.85 1,336.37 363.48 UC Not received.
25 TELANGANA 514.20 439.5 UC Not received.
26 TRIPURA 160.56 160.56 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
27 UTTAR PRADESH 2756.9 1656 1100.9UC received for utilized funds. Received Unspent Balance. Interest awaited.
28 UTTARAKHAND 142.3 142.3 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
29 WEST BENGAL 1206.48 1206.48 0 UC received for the full amount utilized.
Compliance of NGT Case OA 156/2015
OA No. 156 of 2015 (MA No. 474 of 2015) Mrs Sunita PandeyVs Union of India regarding availability of clean water in Baliaand Other Districts of Uttar Pradesh.
Vide Para 19 of the said Judgement, Secretaries, Ministry ofDrinking Water and Ministry of Water Resources, Govt. of India,have been directed to file a joint report after compiling therelevant information about the compliance of the directionsissued vide the instant Order on or before 31.03.2019 (may beinadvertently mentioned as 31.03.2018 in the Order).
Compliance of NGT Case OA 156/2015… (continued)S. No. State/Uts Remarks
1 Andaman and Nicobar Islands Information Awaited2 Andhra Pradesh Information Awaited3 Arunachal Pradesh Information Awaited4 Assam Information Received5 Chandigarh Information Awaited6 Chhattisgarh Information Awaited7 Dadra and Nagar Haveli Information Awaited8 Daman and Diu Information Awaited
9 National Capital Territory of Delhi Information Awaited10 Gujarat Information Awaited11 Haryana Information Received12 Himachal Pradesh Information Awaited13 Jammu and Kashmir Information Awaited14 Jharkhand Information Awaited15 Karnataka Information Awaited16 Kerala Information Awaited17 Maharashtra Information Awaited18 Manipur Information Awaited
Compliance of NGT Case OA 156/2015…..(continued)
No. State/Uts Remarks
19 Meghalaya Information Awaited20 Mizoram Information Awaited21 Nagaland Information Awaited22 Odisha Information Awaited23 Puducherry Information Awaited24 Punjab Information Awaited25 Sikkim Information Awaited26 Uttar Pradesh Information Awaited
27 West Bengal Information Awaited28 Bihar Information Received29 Goa Information Received30 Lakshadweep Information Received31 Madhya Pradesh Information Received32 Rajasthan Information Received33 Tamil Nadu Information Received34 Telangana Information Received35 Tripura Information Received36 Uttarakhand Information Received
Lab Ranking
Why Lab Ranking?
5% WQMS funding
With assistance from Government of India, 2,298 water quality testinglaboratories at various levels, have been set up in the country as on15.01.2019
In order to encourage competitiveness, greater ownership, improve the quality and strengthen the functioning.
The decision was taken in consultation with States during the workshop held at MDWS, New Delhi on 10th May, 2018.
Accordingly, a ranking score based on 8 indicators was developed and was shared with States for comments /suggestions.
Roster for sample collection :
To ensure representative sampling
Random sampling
75% of tests are to be conducted based on roster and for remaining 25% flexibility is given to States.
UDWP-2019
Why revision ?
1. Emerging contaminants
2. Advanced Equipments
3. Technological innovations
4. Reforms in procurements
A need was felt to revise the same and a committee was constituted under theChairpersonship of Director, CSIR-NEERI, Nagpur comprising experts from:-
State Rural Water Supply Departments,
MDWS
National institutes of repute namely BIS, NABL, NEERI, NIV, ICMR, CGWB & NCDWSQ
The Committee held several meetings and revised the 1st edition of the Protocol which wassubjected to internal and external review and comments were received on the protocol.
These comments were thoroughly analyzed and appropriately considered in the Protocol(Second Edition).
ObjectiveWith the flexibility to States/UTs, this document will provide handholding technical support to RuralWater Supply Departments as under:-
Setting-up and strengthening of drinking water quality testing laboratories at State, District andSub-division/block level including mobile water quality testing laboratories.
Providing guidance to personnel at different managerial levels in water quality testing, monitoring,data interpretation and reporting.
Involving Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) and empowering community on water quality issues
Creating awareness generation amongst the community
Conducting sanitary survey and indicative testing of drinking water at grass root level
Corrective actions for chemical contaminants by identifying safe source and identifying suitabletreatment technologies
Main Features of Protocol (Second Edition)
The Protocol plays an advisory role with flexibility as per state specific needs
Incorporation of revised standards of Iron and Arsenic as per amendments in IS 10500:2012
Strengthened institutional framework with the flexibility to States/UTs regarding merger oflower level laboratories with higher category of laboratories depending on local context andneed
Well defined functions of laboratories at all levels as under:-
State Level
District and Sub-divisional/block level
Mobile Drinking Water Quality Testing
Fixing targets for sampling/testing of sources by State level laboratory also
Main Features of Protocol (Second Edition) contd
Clearly defined roles and responsibilities of Institutions at national, State, District, Sub-divisional, block and Gram Panchayat level
Clearly defined roles and responsibilities of RWSS Department and laboratory personnel
Strengthened structure of human resource at various levels with flexibility to States/UTs as perlocal needs
Testing of samples from pre-planned roster of sources to be generated on NRDWP IMIS everymonth
Ranking of State and district laboratories and felicitating the best performing labs in thecountry
Cross verification by States and 3rd Party verification of labs by MDWS
Main Features of Protocol (Second Edition) contd
Strategy for AMC/CAMC of instruments/equipments
Incorporation of advanced instruments like Ion Chromatograph, GC-MS, ICP-MS,ICP-OES
Focus on quality assurance and quality control
Emphasis on use of GeM portal for procurement
Focus on NABL accreditation as per IS/ISO/IEC 17025:2017
Incorporation of best practices from States
THANKS