mike barker. proyecto empower “empowering customers to save energy by informative billing”

Introduction

Cerdanyola

Demo Site

Features

Mike Barker [email protected]

JORNADA INFORMATIVA, ENERGÍA INTELIGENTE PARA EUROPA (EIE)

CONVOCATORIA 2013, Madrid, 31 de enero 2013

Proyecto EMPOWER

“Empowering customers to save energy by

informative billing”

GUIÓN

• Presentación CIMNE

• Resumen del proyecto EMPOWER

• Análisis del proceso de preparación de la

propuesta

• Conclusiones

www.cimne.com

http://www.cimne.com/cdl1/vpage/2/0/Menu-web-cimne/eng/About/Cimne-in-numbers

The Building Energy and Environment Group (BEE) is an autonomous research unit

of CIMNE. It was founded in 2001.

EU supported projects:

AIDA - Affirmative Integrated Energy Design Action,

http://www.aidaproject.eu/

BECA – Balanced European Conservation Approach – ICT services for

resource saving in social housing, http://www.beca-project.eu

Build up - the European web portal for energy efficiency in buildings,

http://www.buildup.eu/

eSESH- Saving Energy in Social Housing with ICT., http://www.esesh.eu

SEMANCO - Semantic Technologies For Carbon Reduction In Urban

Planning, http://semanco-project.eu/index.htm

SmartSpaces - Saving Energy in Europe's Public Buildings Using ICT,

http://www.smartspaces.eu

Start up company: INERGY (http://inergybcn.com/)

CIMNE BEEGROUP

GUIÓN




propuesta

• Conclusiones

Empower

• Objetivo: – “to empower consumers by involving and informing them, helping

them take measures to save energy on the basis of the information

they read on their meters or on their bills.”

• Presupuesto (en negociación): – Coste total: 2M€

– Suporte UE: 1,5M€ (75%)

• Consorcio: – 12 participants from 5 EU members states (Be, Dk, Es, Fr, It).

• four utility companies (Dk, Es, Fr, It)

• in a well balanced team with R&D specialists and social agents

representing the target group.

• Duración: 30 meses

• to implement more informative billing

services as the basis for energy

performance improvement programmes

and the development of energy services.

EMPOWER Coverage of services

HESPUL (FR)

Technical support

CIMNE (ES)

Analysis engine

Polito (IT)

Evaluation and

analysis

ALEC (FR)

Social support

GISCE (ES)

Metering and

billing

Sinergie (IT)

Socio-economic

study

Reggio Emilia

(IT) End user

perspective

Power-link (BE)

Communication EnergiMidit

Denmark

EL-GAS

Spain

GEG

France

IREN

Italy

• over 270 000 consumers will be involved.

• to save up to 25% of the approximately 20% baseload

household electricity consumption not addressed by

other energy efficiency measures.

Experimental group, 244890

Control Group, 27.210

153.000 Denmark81.000 France

2.790 Italy8.100 Spain

17.000 Denmark9.000 France

310 Italy900 Spain

Test group800

200 Denmark200 France200 Italy200 Spain

GUIÓN




propuesta

• Conclusiones

El PROCESO EN EL TIEMPO

• Idea / concepto /necesidad

• Propuesta de proyecto

• Convocatoria adecuada

• Esbozo de propuesta

• Investigación de interés

• Construcción y consolidación del consorcio

• Desarrollo de la propuesta

• Revisión y control de calidad

• Entrega

LOS FACTORES CRÍTICOS

• La convocatoria

• La sección / área / acción

• El estado del arte

• Las prioridades a nivel EU/nacional/local

• Los 5 criterios de evaluación

• La puntuación y los umbrales

CRITERIOS Y PUNCTUACIÖN

10: Excelente…completamente en línea con el criterio

8-9: Muy bien…aunque podría haber sido aún mejor

7: Bien…pero mejoras necesarias

6: Suficiente pero necesita mejoras importantes

4-5: Insuficiente : debilidades insalvables

2-3: Lamentable: muy débil / errores de fondo.

1: Terrible: mal enfocada y/o superficial

5 Criterios:

1 Relevancia 2 Calidad 3 Impacto 4 Valor EU 5 Recursos

En resumen….

El reto

La respuesta / solución

que proponemos…

Concretamos en que

consiste la acción

Especificamos los resultados

concretos y medibles

Detallamos el porque del consorcio

…en el contexto de la

convocatoria

Los criterios de evaluación

• 1. Relevance of the proposed action

a) extent to which the proposed action is

consistent with the IEE II Call priorities;

b) extent to which the proposed action responds

to important user needs and market barriers;

c) extent to which the proposed action

complements other related activities.


• 2. Quality of implementation

methodology (score 0-10), including:

a) suitability of the proposed approach and

extent to which the proposed action engages

the target groups and stakeholders;

b) clarity of the work packages, project planning

and suitability of performance monitoring;

c) quality of communication plan for the uptake

of solution(s).

Approach…

Engagement of target group….

(a) Target Group(s) How will the target group(s) benefit from this action? Key task(s) nº from your work programme Name of organisation(s) providing a Letter of Support (Country)

Direct Consumer representatives

Housing / tenants agents

Provision of models for empowerment services that can be applied to other

utility services.

Gaining of good practice examples to help in other programmes for

awareness raising and in collaboration with energy service companies

T2.3 User expectation

WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions

WP4, WP6, WP7

ATC Torino – Housing company Italy

CNL Isère (Tenants Union) France

UFC (Consumers’ association) France

ECC - European Customer Centre Belgium

Indirect Consumer representatives

Public authorities

Provision of models and examples (see above).

Insight into the possibilities for public participation and empowerment in

smart cities and communities through smart metering

T2.5 Legal and reg. issues


WP4, WP6, WP7

City of Grenoble France

Province of Turin / Torino Italy

City of Turin Italy

Government of Catalonia Spain

Energy efficiency agencies / organisations New tools to enable more precise targeting of awareness raising and capacity

building campaigns

WP3-4 – Response to initial and definitive service provisions WP4,

WP6, WP7

IREA Regional organisation for energy efficiency and renewable

energy (EE & RES)

France

CLER Umbrella organisation for EE & RES France

FNCCR Umbrella organisation for EE & RES France

(b) Key Actor(s)

How will the key actor(s) contribute to this action? Key task(s) nº from your work programme Name of organisation(s) providing a Letter of Support (Country)

Utility companies Feedback: contrasting the services developed with their own business

models and metering systems.

Validation: responding to surveys about business opportunities in their

markets

T2.4 Use cases for service operation


WP6, WP7

Wase Wind Belgium

Ecopower (utility) Belgium

SOMENERGIA (utility) Spain

Dragefossen Norway

Energy sector associations Validation: responding to surveys about business opportunities in their

markets

Communication: informing members and facilitating contacts

T2.5 Legal and reg. issues

WP7

Danish Energy Association Denmark

ELE – Union of local energy agencies France

ASEME (Electricity Companies association) Spain

Energy sector industrial companies Feedback: contrasting the services developed with their own business

models and metering systems

WP6, WP7

AG EOS Belgium


• 3. Ambition and credibility of the

impacts of the proposed action

a) services / outcomes produced by the action

(deliverables, hours of training, etc.);

b) impact within and beyond the project lifetime

assessed with specific, measurable,

accepted, realistic and time-dependent

(SMART) indicators;

c) sustainability of the solutions offered by the

proposed action beyond the project lifetime.

Indicadores cuantificados


• 4. EU added value

a) a evidence that collaboration / team working

across national borders will lead to greater

benefits than separate actions at national /

local level in the same countries

b) appropriate geographical focus of the

proposed action including learning and

exchanges among stakeholders;

c) transferability of the solutions offered by the

proposed action.

¿Porqué un proyecto internacional?

Appropriate geographical focus and

transferability…


• 5. Resources allocated to the proposed

action

a) management and composition of the team,

balance of skills, experience, and

responsibilities;

b) appropriate levels of hours per partner and

per work package;

c) justification of costs (sub-contracts, travel

costs, and other specific costs) and co-

financing.

GUIÓN




propuesta

• Conclusiones

Conclusiones 1/2

• Asegurarse que la convocatoria coincide

con su experiencia/estrategia.

• Empezar con tiempo (4 meses o más.

• Utilizar todos los medios disponibles para

contrastar ideas y formar el mejor consorcio

posible.

• Haz caso a la documentación de la

convocatoria.

Conclusiones 2/2

• Implica todos los socios en el desarrollo de

la propuesta.

• Explicar en la propuesta cómo se

involucrarán otros agentes.

• Saber explicar porqué el proyecto se tiene

que ejecutar a nivel Europeo.

• Definir objetivos, cuantificar indicadores e

impactos.

• Contrastar la propuesta con los criterios de

evaluación (si es posible por un tercero).

Gracias

Mike Barker

Responsible de proyectos internacionales

CIMNE BEEGROUP

[email protected]

¡Ánimos!

mike barker. proyecto empower “empowering customers to save energy by informative billing”

Documents