microcellular material
DESCRIPTION
microcellularTRANSCRIPT
1
DEFINITION OF MICROCELLULAR & SPONGE PRODUCTS
1. MICROCELLULAR PRODUCTS HAVE SUBSTANTIALLY CLOSED CELLULAR STRUCTURE - HAVING INDIVIDUAL CELL WALL
WHEREAS
2. SPONGE RUBBER HAS OPEN OR INTERCONNECTING STRUCTURE.
TYPES OF CELLULAR RUBBER
1. EXPANDED RUBBER
2. MICROCELLULAR PRODUCT
3. SPONGE RUBBER
2.
TYPES OF MICROCELLULAR SOLING
I.SOFT MICROCELLULAR SOLING FOR HAWAI OR BEACH SLIPPERS.II.MEDIUM HARD MICRO CELLULAR FOR LEATHERS TOP CHAPPALS.III.HARD MICROCELLULAR SOLING FOR LEATHER SHOES SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF THESE SOLES ARE AS FOLLOWS.CATEGORY
APPROX
APPROX SHORE A
DENSITY
HARDNESSHAWAI / BEACH
0.3- 0.4
30 - 45SLIPPERMED. HARD
0.5 0.6
55 - 65
MICRO SOLING
HARD MICRO
0.7- 0.8
70 - 80
SOLING
3
HAWAI SLIPPERS:ORGINALLY THESE SLIPPERS WERE MEANT FOR USING ON BEACHES OR INDOOR BECAUSE OF THEIR LOW COST THESE CHAPPALS HAVE BECOME VERY POPULAR AMOUNGST THE POOR POPULATION WHO USE IT AS ALL PURPOSE FOOTWEAR.
MEDIUM HARD MICRO SOLING
GENERALLY USED FOR LEATHER OR RESIN UPPER CHAPPALS. THESE ARE VERY MUCH IN HIGH DEMAND FOR FASHION CONSCIOUS URBAN PEOPLE WHO NEED MORE ELEGANT AND LIGHT WEIGHT FOOTWEAR THEN LEATHER SOLE CHAPPAL.
HARD MICRO SOLINGTHIS SUPERIOR PERFORMANCE SOLING MATERIAL IS GENERALLY USED FOR LIGHT WEAR AND HEAVY DUTY SHOE SOLES BECAUSE OF ITS LIGHT WEIGHT AND BETTER WEAR RESISTANCE.THE QUALITY OF MICROCELLULAR MATERIAL CAN BE JUDGED FROM:A.DENSITYB.HARDNESS
C.SPLIT TEAR RESISTANCE
D.SHRINKAGE CONTROL
E.FLEX RESISTANCE
4.METHODS OF MANUFACTURING MICROCELLULAR SOLEA.PRODUCED FROM RUBBER COMPOUND CONTAINING ORGANIC BLOWING AGENT.
B.MOULDING BY COMPRESSION MOULDING SYSTEM.
C.MOULD FILLED WITH COMPOUND 3% EXCESS IN VOLUME
D.MOULDING AT HIGH PRESSURE IN A HYDRAULIC PRESS
E.TEMP NORMALLY 145 155 DEGREE C
F.PRECURED SHEETS ARE FOLLOWED BY POST CURING IN A CHAMBER (HOT AIR CURE) AT 100 DEGREE C FOR 3-4 HRS.
5.
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENT FOR MICROCELLULAR RUBBER SHEETS
TYPE-1
TYPE-2
I. RELATIVE DENSITY 0.60-0.70
0.45-0.55
II HARDNESS IRHD, MIN.
65 Degree
50 Degree
III CHANGE IN HARDNESS
+5 TO 0
+5 TO - 0
AFTER AGEING AT 100 +
1 Degree C FOR 24 HRS.
IV COMPRESSION SET AT
12
15
27 + 1 Degree C FOR 24
HRS., % MAX.
VSPLIT TEAR STRENGTH
8.0
6.0
KG. MIN.
VIHEAT SHRINKAGE AT
2
3
100 Degree C FOR 1 HOUR
IN BOTH DIRECTIONS,
% MAX.
VIIWATER ABSORPTION, % 1.5
2.0
BY MASS, MAX.
6.PHYSICAL REQUIREMENT FOR STANDARD QUALITY HAWAI SOLE
I. RELATIVE DENSITY
0.3-0.6
II. HARDNESS IRHD
45 degree-50 degree
III.CHANGE IN HARDNESS
+ 5- - 0
AFTER AGEING AT 100 +
1 degree C FOR 24 HRS.IV.COMPRESSION SET AT 27 15
+ 1 Degree C FOR 24 HRS.
% MAX
V.SPLIT TEAR STRENGTH, kg.
4-5
VI. ROOM TEMPERATURE
1.0 2.0
SHRINKAGE AT 27 + 1 degree
C FOR 4 WEEKS, % MAX.
VII. FLEX RESISTANCE, NUMBER
OF CYCLES ROSS FLEX
TESTING MACHINE
A. INITIAL CRACK, MIN.
40,000 60,000
B. 600% CUT GROWTH
60,000 100,000
7
PHYSICAL REQUIREMENT FOR STANDARD HAWAI STRAP
I.RELATIVE DENSITY
1.3 1.4
II.TENSILE STRENGHT, kg /cm2
150-160
III. ELONGATION, %
400-500
IV. HARDNESS IRHD
60 +5
CHANGE IN INITIAL HARDNESS
+5 TO -5
AFTER ACCELERATED AGEING
FOR 24 HOURS AT 100 + 1 degree C
VI. FLEX RESISTANCE NUMBER OF
CYCLES ON ROSS FLEX TESTER
A. INITIAL CRACKS
60,000-85,000
B. 600% CUT GROWTH
100,000-130,000
VII. TEAR STRENGTH, kg. / cm2
30-45
8RECIPE RUBBER MICROCELLULAR SOLE
INGREDIENTS
PBW
Kgs.
NR
-
60.00
HSR
-
40.00
WOOD ROSIN
-
2.00
ZINC OXIDE
-
4 5.00
STEARIC ACID
-
4 5.00
ANTI OXIDANT
-
1.00
VALCAFOR F
-
0.80
MBTS
-
0.30
PROCESS OIL
-
5.00
SALICYLIC ACID
-
0.50
PPT. SILICA
-
10.00
ALUM. SILICATE
-
20 30.00
HARD CLAY
-
60 70.00
SULPHUR
-
2.50
DNPT
-
6 7.00
COLOUR
-
AS. REQD.
MICROCELLULAR -
70 80.00
CRUMB
CURE 7 8 MINUTE AT 155 160 Degree C.
PROPERTIES:
DENSITY 0.45 0.50
HARDNESS 48 50 IRHD
SPLIT TEAR - 3.5 4.0 kgs.
SHRINKAGE (OVEN) 1.5 %
TYPICAL FORMULATION MICRO COMPOUND
INGREDIENTS
QUANTITYRMA
20.0
20.0
SBR 1958
60.0
10.0
SBR 1502
20.0
-
RB 820
-
70.0
ZINC OXIDE
4.0
6.0
STEARIC ACID
5.0
5.0
PHENOLIC ANTI
1.0
1.0
OXIDANT
SILICA
20.0
20.0
ALUMINIUM SILICATE40.0
35.0
CHINA CLAY
70.0
50.0
MICRO CRUMB
50.0
-
PETROLEUM JELLY
5.0
5.0
PROCESS OIL
10.0
5.0
WOOD ROSIN
4.0
4.0
DEG
2.0
2.0
TITANIUM DIOXIDE
5.0
5.0
SULPHUR
2.2
1.5
MBTS
-
1.4
F
1.2
-
TMT
0.1
-
BLOWING AGENT
5.0
5.0
(DNPT)
ORGANIC COLOUR
as reqd.as reqd.
CURED AT 150 degree C6.0
12.0
DENSITY
0.5
0.4
HARDNESS SHORE A Deg.620.0500.0
SPLIT TEAR STRENGTH4.0
3.0
Kg. / cm 2
% SHRINKAGE
1.50
2.0
ROSE FLEX TEST
- -
CRACK INITIATION, KC35.0
45.0
10
RECIPE STRAP COMPOUNDS
INGREDIENTS
QUANTITYRMA
100.0
ZINC OXIDE
6.0
STEARIC ACID
1.50
PHENOLIC ANTI OXIDANT
1.00
ALUMINIUM SILICATE
30.00
PPTD. CALCIUM CARBOINATE
30.00
CHINA CLAY
30.00
PETROLEUM JELLY
6.00
CI RESIN
2.00
DEG
1.00
TITANIUM DIOXIDE
5.00
MBTS
1.20
TMT
0.20
SULPHUR
1.80
SANTOGARD PVI-50
0.25
CURED AT 150 Deg. C (M)
4
SPECIFIC GRAVITY
1.37
TENSILE STRENGTH, kg / cm2
170
ELONGATION AT BREAK %
430
300% MODULS, kg / cm2
65
ANGULAR TEAR STRENGTH,
27
Kg / cm2
HARDNESS SHORE A
54
11TESTING OF MICROCELLULAR SOLING
SOLE
STRAPS
PARAMETERS
1. DENSITY (gms. cc)
1. SP. GRAVITY
2. HARDNESS-(IRHD)
2. HARDNESS
3. SPLIT TEAR-kgs.
3. TEAR STRENGTH
(kgs)
4. THICKNESS (m /m)
4. THICKNESS )m/m)
5. FLEXIBILITY (ROSS-CYCLES)
6. SHRINKAGE-%
OVEN 1hrs. AT 100 Degree C
ROOM TEMP.
60 Degree C-1 hrs. EVA
7. COMPRESSION SET (%)
12
EVA MICROCELLULAR
VARIOUS USE OF EVA MICROCULLULAR IN FOOTWAR INDUSTRY
1. AS SOLING MATERIAL
2. AS MIDSOLE (JOGGER TYPE SHOE)
3. INSOLING MATERIAL (MOULDED)
4. LAMINATED INSOLE
5. UPPER MATERIAL FOR SANDALS
6. VARIOUS THERMO FORMED COMPONENTS
13EVA MICRO SOLING PROPERTIES
A. VERY LIGHT & COMFORTABLE PRODUCT POSSIBLE
B. NO ROOM TEMP. SHRINKAGE
C. NO POST TEMPERING & STORAGE
D. REQUIRED PHYSICALS FOR MICRO SOLING ACHIEVABLE.
E. BRIGHT & ATTRACTIVE COLOUR POSSIBLE
14PHYSICAL PROPERTIS EVA SOLING
PROPERTIES
BEACH SANDAL SHOE SOLING1. DENSITY (gm/cc)
0.20 0.25
0.35 0.40
2. HARDNESS (IRHD)
25 30
50 55
35 40
3. SPLIT TEAR kgs.
(2.5 cm Width test piece) 2.5 3.0
5.0
4. SHRINKAGE
OVEN (%)
A. AT 60 degree C. 1 hrs. 1.0
0.5
B. ROOM TEMP. 1 wk. 0.5 nil
nil
5. COMPRESSION SET (%)80
70
15BASIC DESIGNING OF COMPOUNDA.EVA COPOLYMER
B.CROSS LINKING AGENT
C.BLOWING AGENT
D.ACTIVATOR
E.LUBRICANT
OTHER COMMON INGREDIENTSI.INORGANIC FILLER
II.PIGMENT
III.POLYMER MODIFIER
IV.MICRO WASTE (EVA)
16
EVA SOLE RECIPE (TYPICAL)
INGRIDIENTS
BEACH LEATHER SHOES
SANDAL SOLING
1. EVA (16 18 % VA)
100.00
70.00
2. HIGH STYRENE RESIN --
30.00
3. AZO TYPE BLOWING8.00
5.00
AGENT (ADCL)
4.DCP 90 %
1.0
1.3
5.ZINC OXIDE
1.0
1.0
6.STEARIC ACID
1.0
1.0
7. PPT. CAL. CARB.
30.00
30 40.00
8. PIGMENTS
AS REQD.
AS REQD.
9. EVA CRUMB
10 20.00
20 30.00
17EVA MOULDING
1. TIME
13 15 MINS. (15 m/m THICK SHEET)
2. TEMP. -
160 165 Degree C.
3. HYD. PRESSURE 150 200 kg / cm sq.
4. LOADING-
0.5 1% EXCESS
1. QUICK OPENING PRESS (6 10 Sec.)
MOULD
A. THE EDGE OF THE MOULD MUST BE PROVIDED WITH A GENEROUS TAPER (45 degree ANGLE)
B. THE TAPERED SECTION SHOULD BE SMOOTH.
C. THE PRESS MUST OPEN VERY RAPIDLY (10 cm / sec) Minimum.
D. THE ENTIRE SURFACE OF THE MOULD MUST BE SPREAD WITH MOULD RELEASING AGENT.
19RECENT POLYMER BLENDS
POLYMERS
CURE
FEATURES1.NR + SBR + HSRSULPHURCONV. CURING
POST CURING &
STORAGE REQD.
2.NR + HSR + EVAPEROXIDELOW SHRINKAGE
NO. POST. CURING
3. NR. + PE
NO. SHRINKAGE
NO. POST CURE
NO. STORAGE
4. NR + LDPE + EVA
5. PVC + NITRILESULPHORNO POST CURE
NO. SHRINKAGE
MOULDING
PROBLEM
6. LDPE + NR + HSRSULPHORSATIFACTORY
QUALITY
ACHIEVABLE
20SHRINKAGE CONTROL OF MICROCELLULAR PRODUCTS
1.BY USING SUITABLE POLYMER OR BLEND OF POLYMERS
2.BY USING APPROPRIATE REINFORCING FILLER
3.BY PROPER PROCESSING METHODS
a.SUFFICIENT MASTICATION
b.STORAGE AFTER MIXING AND SHEETING
c.STAGE CURING
e.STORAGE AFTER CURING