michigan connected and automated vehicle … connected and automated vehicle ... automated vehicle...
TRANSCRIPT
Michigan Connected and
Automated Vehicle
Working Group
January 30, 2018
Meeting Packet
1. Agenda
2. Meeting Notes
3. Attendance List
4. Presentations
Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle
Working Group
January 30, 2018
Link Engineering Dearborn Technical Center
401 Southfield Rd., Dearborn, MI 48120
Meeting Agenda
12:30 PM Registration and Networking
01:00 PM Introduction and Update
Adela Spulber, Transportation Systems Analyst, Center for Automotive Research
Welcome Address and Overview of Link Engineering Company
Terry Woychowski, VP of North American Test Operations, Link Engineering Company
Challenges, Roles, and Actions for Testing Connected & Automated Vehicles: An AVPG
Overview
Dr. Edward Straub, Technical Program Director, American Center for Mobility
Navigating Risk and Reward: Top Legal Issues in Connected and Autonomous Vehicles
Jennifer Dukarski, Attorney, Butzel Long
Hot Topics Discussion
Scott Shogan, Vice President, Connected/Automated Vehicle Market Leader, WSP
02:40 PM Networking Break
03:00 PM Partnership Opportunities and Update on the 2018 ITS America Annual Meeting
Collin Castle, ITS Program Manager, Michigan Department of Transportation
The Big Bang for AV Law & Policy: Developments in 2017
Allison Drutchas, Counsel, Autonomous Vehicles, General Motors
Overview of the 2018 Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition - Self Drive Challenge
Gerald Lane, Senior Engineer, Business Developer and Project Manager, Great Lakes
Systems & Technology LLC (GLS&T)
04:00 PM Meeting Adjourned / Walking Tour
Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle
Working Group The 2018 winter meeting of the Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle Working Group was held on January 30, 2018, at the Link Engineering Dearborn Technical Center (401 Southfield Rd., Dearborn, MI 48120).
Meeting Notes Adela Spulber, Transportation Systems Analyst at the Center for Automotive Research (CAR), opened the meeting and discussed the agenda, Working Group mission, and noteworthy connected and automated vehicle (CAV) events. Adela highlighted CAR’s upcoming Industry Briefing, Artificial Intelligence Applications to Driver Assistance and Vehicle Automation, which will take place on February 15, 2018, at the VisTaTech Center (18600 Haggerty Rd., Livonia, MI). After Adela’s introduction, Terry Woychowski, Vice-President of North American Test Operations at Link Engineering Company, welcomed the group and gave an overview of Link Engineering’s activities regarding testing equipment and services. Terry specifically described Link’s tests of adaptive braking, electronic stability control, and lane departure systems. Following Terry’s presentation, Dr. Edward Straub, Technical Program Director at the American Center for Mobility, discussed the challenges and roles of CAV testing. Edward began by pointing that CAV testing is cross-disciplinary and related to many standards across industries. Also, CAV testing covers not only the performance of components and software but also the decision-making ability of systems – evaluating the automated driving task, in other words. That will require developing an ever-evolving scenario catalog as well as criteria for passing the tests. Finally, Edward gave an update on ACM’s development. ACM opened its high-speed loop in December 2017 and will continue building different parts of the proving ground in the next years. After Edward’s presentation, Jennifer Dukarski, Attorney at Butzel Long, addressed the top legal issues related to connected and automated vehicles. Jennifer first explained that while companies have great opportunities to monetize data, they also need to address privacy and security concerns and comply with the relevant U.S. and international legal framework. Related to cybersecurity, cases involving speculative hacking might increase in number and importance over the next years, and upcoming decisions on data breach cases in other industries might affect their outcomes. Jennifer also pointed out that a critical issue related to warranty will be dealing with components that have a life expectancy inferior to that of the vehicle. Jennifer also explained that the current framework for dealing with product liability will be sufficient to cover CAV-related issues and does not necessarily need to evolve. Finally, on liability, Jennifer indicated that CAVs raise many questions (such as liability when an automaker fails to train a new user to
operate a vehicle correctly), but also provides answers (because more data will be available to investigate vehicle crashes). Following Jennifer’s presentation, Scott Shogan, Vice-President and CAV Market Leader at WSP, facilitated the discussion on a few of the latest CAV topics. The discussion focused on the evolution of the federal Automated Vehicle Policy. The Working Group members exchanged views on the elements that should be included in the third edition of the Policy. Then, the participants debated on the essential characteristics that would make an area the right place for first deployments of automated taxi networks, namely detailed maps, controlled environments such as airports and university campuses, and an informed public. After a short break, Collin Castle, ITS Program Manager at the Michigan Department of Transportation, provided an update on MDOT’s CAV activities. Collin presented the Department’s new CAV Strategic Plan, which will be available on MDOT’s website in the following weeks. Also, MDOT released a Connected Signals Policy, which states that all new traffic signals on the MDOT system will be CV-enabled, and details the technical requirements. Then, Collin mentioned a few of MDOT’s partnerships, notably the red light violation warning project with General Motors, the work zone data harmonization part of the Smart Belt Coalition, platooning testing with TARDEC, cross-border CAV testing with Magna and Continental, and the Coalition for Safety Sooner. Finally, Collin informed Working Group members about the 2018 ITS America Annual Meeting & Expo, which will take place June 4-7 at Cobo Center in Detroit. The call for papers is open until March 1st, and the call for demonstrations is open until March 15. More information about exhibits and demonstrations is available on the event’s website (https://itsdetroit2018.org/) and by contacting Michele Mueller, Sr. Project Manager at MDOT and chair of the Technology Showcase for the event ([email protected]). Allison Drutchas, Counsel Autonomous Vehicles at General Motors, reviewed the most significant developments for automated vehicle law and policy in 2017. Allison compared the two federal bills in progress, the House of Representatives’ SELF DRIVE Act and the Senate’s AV START Act. Allison also analyzed the changes brought to the Automated Vehicle Policy by the 2017 update. Finally, Allison focused on state legislation, specifically on seven states including Michigan that recently removed barriers to automated vehicle deployments, enabled self-certification of these vehicles similar to the federal level, set insurance coverage requirements, and maintained current liability standards. Gerald Lane, Senior Engineer, Business Developer and Project Manager at Great Lakes Systems & Technology LLC (GLS&T), closed the meeting with an overview of the 2018 Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition - Self Drive Challenge. The event will take place June 1-4, 2018 at Oakland University in Rochester, MI and is an excellent opportunity for companies to interact with student engineers and identify potential recruits. At the end of the meeting, Working Group members had the opportunity to tour the Link Engineering Dearborn Technical Center. MDOT maintains a webpage dedicated to its work related to CAV technologies (http://www.michigan.gov/mdot/0,1607,7-151-9621_11041_38217---,00.html). The page includes documents, presentations, and other materials that may be of interest to CAV stakeholders. Meeting packets containing materials (agenda, meeting notes, attendance, and presentation slides) from past Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle Working Group meetings are also available on this page.
Michigan Connected and
Automated Vehicle
Working Group
Attendance List
First name Last name Organization Email
Carlos Agudelo Link Engineering [email protected]
Niles Annelin MDOT [email protected]
Zahra Bahrani Fard CAR [email protected]
Jonathon Baugh Pillar Technology [email protected]
Dick Beaubien Beaubien Engineering [email protected]
Debra Bezzina UMTRI [email protected]
Danielle Bowman Workforce Intelligence
Network
Robert Brincheck PTC [email protected]
Colin Brooks MTRI [email protected]
Collin Castle MDOT [email protected]
Yifeng (Chase) Chen AECOM / SEMTOC [email protected] ;
[email protected] Yubao Chen University of Michigan-
Dearborn
Monica Coulter State of Michigan - DTMB [email protected]
Terry Croad City of Southfield [email protected]
Mark Davids Connected and Automated
Vehicle Education Network
Claudia Denardi Amphenol-Adronics [email protected]
Hiren Desai Continental Automotive
Systems Inc
hiren.desai@continental-
corporation.com Komal Doshi Ann Arbor SPARK [email protected]
Ami Dotan Karamba Security [email protected]
Allison Drutchas General Motors [email protected]
Jamie Dudley Link Engineering [email protected]
Jennifer Dukarski Butzel Long [email protected]
Gregg Dunn UAW [email protected]
Bob Feldmaier Macomb CC [email protected]
Cass Ferris Morley [email protected]
Christophe Gaillard Aisin [email protected]
Tony Gioutsos TASS International [email protected]
First name Last name Organization Email
Steve Gutterman HWA Analytics [email protected]
Lisa Hart CAR [email protected]
Scott Heim TARDEC [email protected]
Kim Hill HWA Analytics [email protected]
Qiang Hong CAR [email protected]
Linos Jacovides Michigan State University [email protected]
Ahmad Jawad RCOC [email protected]
Shugang Jiang SF Motors [email protected]
Alex Kade TARDEC [email protected]
Nelson Kelly Macomb CC [email protected]
Johanna Kinsler SRG Global [email protected]
Matt Klawon AECOM [email protected]
Marc Kull WWL Vehicle Services
Americas, Inc
Jerry Lane Great Lakes Systems &
Technology LLC and NDIA-MI
Alan Lecz Washtenaw CC [email protected]
Terry Ledwidge Link Engineering [email protected]
Luke Liu City of Ann Arbor [email protected]
Christyn Lucas Detroit Regional Chamber [email protected]
Heinz Mattern Magna [email protected]
Kiel McIntosh Carrier & Gable [email protected]
Brad McNett U.S. Army NAC [email protected]
Samir Anthony Mouawad Dawda, Mann, Mulcahy &
Sadler, P.L.C.
Mahendra Muli dSPACE Inc. [email protected]
Suzanne Murtha AECOM [email protected]
James Ohlinger PPG [email protected]
Frank Perry Savari [email protected]
Mohammad Poorsartep Valeo [email protected]
Nick Posavetz Macomb County [email protected]
Susan Proctor MEDC [email protected]
Pierre Quenioux SRG Global [email protected]
Thomas Richer MDOT [email protected]
Thierry Rolina Danlaw Inc. [email protected]
Marc Rosenmayr Motherson Innovations marc.rosenmayr@motherson-
innovations.com Anna Rossi Valeo [email protected]
Ann Schlenker Argonne National Laboratory [email protected]
Keith Schultz General Motors [email protected]
Stephen Selander Selander Law Office, PLLC [email protected]
Jerry Shavrnoch Link Engineering [email protected]
Weisong Shi Wayne State University [email protected]
First name Last name Organization Email
Scott Shogan WSP [email protected]
Jeffrey Skvarce Continental jeffrey.skvarce@continental-
corporation.com Adela Spulber CAR [email protected]
Edward Straub American Center for Mobility [email protected]
Barbara Swan AECOM / SEMTOC [email protected];
[email protected] Brad Warner Lambert, Edwards &
Associated
[email protected] Rick Warner TSPS, Inc. [email protected]
Lou Wassel Chrome Star [email protected]
Steve Wesoloski RAVE Computer [email protected]
Terry Woychowski Link Engineering [email protected]
John Wright Burris Law, PLLC [email protected] John Xia Shuo Hong International
Supply [email protected]
Ken Yang AECOM [email protected]
Michigan Connected and
Automated Vehicle
Working Group
Presentations
Michigan Connected and Automated Vehicle Working GroupLink Engineering Dearborn Technical Center
January 30th, 2018
2
Meeting Agenda
CENTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH
1:00 PM Introductions and Update
Adela Spulber, Transportation Systems Analyst, CAR
Welcome Address and Overview of Link Engineering Company
Terry Woychowski, VP of North American Test Operations, Link
Engineering Company
Challenges, Roles, and Actions for Testing Connected &
Automated Vehicles: An AVPG Overview
Dr. Edward Straub, Technical Program Director, American Center for
Mobility
Navigating Risk and Reward: Top Legal Issues in Connected and
Autonomous Vehicles
Jennifer Dukarski, Attorney, Butzel Long
Hot Topics Discussion
Scott Shogan, Vice President, Connected/Automated Vehicle
Market Leader, WSP
2:40 PM Networking Break
3:00 PM Partnership Opportunities and Update on the 2018 ITS America
Annual Meeting
Collin Castle, ITS Program Manager, MDOT
The Big Bang for AV Law & Policy: Developments in 2017
Allison Drutchas, Counsel, Autonomous Vehicles, General Motors
Overview of the 2018 Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition -
Self Drive Challenge
Gerald Lane, Senior Engineer, Business Developer and Project
Manager, Great Lakes Systems & Technology LLC (GLS&T)
4:00 PM Meeting Adjourned / Walking Tour
3
Working Group Mission
Cooperatively pursue projects and other activities that are best accomplishedthrough partnerships between multiple agencies, companies, universities, andother organizations and that ultimately advance Michigan’s leadership position inconnected and automated vehicle research, deployment, and operations.
Goals
• Benefit our state and our industry (automotive and more)
• Enhance safety and mobility in Michigan and beyond
CENTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH
4
Industry Briefing:Artificial Intelligence Applications to Driver Assistance and Vehicle AutomationFebruary 15, 2018 | 9:00 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.Schoolcraft College, VisTaTech Center | 18600 Haggerty Rd., Livonia, MI
Speakers Include:
CENTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH
Upcoming Event
www.cargroup.org
Dr. David J. AtkinsonHead, Systems & Technology andChief Research Scientist – Artificial IntelligenceChassis and Safety DivisionSilicon Valley Research & Development CenterContinental Corporation
Dr. William S. MarkPresident, Information and Computing SciencesSRI International
Dr. Mitchell M. RohdeChief Executive OfficerQuantum Signal LLC
Bill VeenhuisSenior Solution Architect - CAENVIDIA Corporation
Dr. Ryan WolcottManager, Simultaneous Localization and MappingToyota Research Institute
5
Upcoming CAV Events
• Artificial Intelligence Applications to Driver Assistance and Vehicle Automation - CAR Industry Briefing February 15, 2018 |Schoolcraft College, Livonia, MI
• 2018 Global Symposium on Connected and Automated Vehicles and Infrastructure March 7-8, 2018 |University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
• dSPACE Tech Day - Autonomous Technology March 15, 2018 | Santa Clara, CA and April 19, 2018 | Novi, MI
• ADAS Sensors 2018 April 4-5, 2018 | DoubleTree Detroit, Dearborn, MI
• 26th Annual Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition (IGVC) June 1-4, 2018 | Oakland University, Rochester, MI
• 2018 ITS America Annual Meeting & Expo June 4-7, 2018 | Cobo Center, Detroit, MI (Call for papers and demonstrations until March 1, 2018)
CENTER FOR AUTOMOTIVE RESEARCH
Thank you to our hosts!
•••
powersports passenger cars
industrial
medium trucks
aircraftrailwaycommercial vehicles
•••••••
Testing, Engineering & Consulting Services
••
•
140 Vehicle Systems
82 Dynamometers
18 Wheel End Stations
41 Test Stands
•••
•••
1. Link Data Acquisition Systems• Link Model 3802• Link Model 4000 V-Max• ProLINK Software/Controls
2. Robots• Steering • Braking
3. Transducers / Instrumentation• Temperature: Link Wireless TCs & Slipring TCs• Pressure: Sensotec, Kulite• Torque: Custom built wheel transducers• GPS/Speed: Link, Garmin, Racelogic• Force: Interface• Travel: Unimeasure• Pitch/Yaw: BEI Technology• NVH: PCB, B&K
•••
••
•
•
•
•••
• LINK has extensive vehicle testing activities throughout the world.
• We provide advanced high-tech test equipment and integrated testing services to vehicle and system manufacturers globally.
• LINK offers other unique advantages: o Established relationships with local contractors and supplierso Universal experience and involvement with vehicle manufacturers
• LINK is ready to partner with you for your testing needs and requirements.
Thank you !
www.linkeng.com
MerciDanke
Grazie Obrigado
Graciasありがとう 감사합니다
Tackďakujem
Challenges, Roles, and Actions for Testing Connected & Automated Vehicles
Edward StraubTechnical Program Director
January, 2018
What is the American Center for Mobility?A not-for-profit, PPP national test facility• Product development,
testing and validation• Lead and accelerate
the identification and development of standards
• Education and training of the workforce & public
A USDOT- Designated Automated Vehicle Proving Ground
The challenge is cross-disciplinary
33
Connected & Automated VehiclesM
echa
nica
l en
gine
erin
gEl
ectr
ical
en
gine
erin
gSo
ftw
are
engi
neer
ing
HMI
Cybe
rsec
urity
Wire
less
&
Tele
com
ms
Infra
stru
ctur
e/ c
ivil
engi
neer
ing
Opt
ics
Big
Data
m
anag
emen
t
Urb
an p
lann
ing
Beha
vior
al sc
ienc
es
Oth
er…
Traditional Proving Ground AV Proving Ground
Standards across industries
• International Standards Organization (ISO) TC 22 (Road Vehicles) and TC204 (ITS)
• Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE)• American Association of State Highway
and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)• SAE• IEEE• GENIVI • Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF)• MirrorLink®• 5GAA• ETSI (European Telecommunications
Standards Institute)• Connected Vehicle Trade Association
(CVTA)
4
CAV cross-disciplinary challenge
4
• ITS-America and its V2I Coalition working groups 3 and 5
• Transportation Research Board (TRB)-Various Committees including NCHRP (National Cooperative Highway Research Program)
• 3GPP• Telecommunications Industry Association
(TIA)• International Telecommunications Union
(ITU)• Consumer Electronics Association (CEA),• W3C• WiFi Alliance• …
Actions: Decomposing the tests
55
Component
• Characterize capabilities• Defect rate• Physical interfaces• Messages & labeling• HMI
Software
• Validation• Lessons from aviation• Functional reliability• Quality & best practices (e.g.
CMMI)
System
• Test / Evaluate the “driving task”
• Inter-Operator and VRU interaction
• Defining Scenarios: variables & patterns; assign acceptable ranges
• Evaluating Scenarios: socially-constructed “success”
Objective outcomesPerformance-oriented
Subjective outcomes“Decision” -oriented
Laboratory/Traditional Proving Ground AV Proving Ground/ On-road
ACM Standards Program
6
Scenario catalogue
• Scenario definition• Cooperation:o Pegasuso Streetwiseo ENABLE S3
PG cooperation
• DOT AVPG community of practice
• International co-od and participation in non-profit CAV PGs and consortia.
• ICPGS
SDO convening
• Accelerate process with SME(s) and dedicated TechPMo SAEo IEEEo ITEo ….
Test development
Test methodologies and safety procedures that support the standardized test, verification, and validation of CAV performance against transportation scenarios
Define scenarios
Establish test methodologies, equipment, and
safety procedures
Create scenario
cataloguePerform tests /
collect data
SDO, International, and Industry coordination
Building a Scenario Catalogue
7
Data cloud architecture
• Data format, frequency• “Real world” Proving
ground data• On-road data• …
• Targets & Infrastructure• Risk analysis & risk mitigation • Test, measurement, and safety equipt• Test procedures (technical performance
& “decisions”)• ….
• Data consolidation• Outcome-oriented• International collaboration• Industry buy-in• Proving ground acceleration• …
• Data mining & analysis• Define elements & variables• Data ranges • Outcomes - define
“acceptable decisions”• …
• Use cases • Scenarios, variables, ranges• Test methods, equip’t, risk management• ….
• Data ingestion• Access control• Analysis, mining, reporting, and anonymizing• ….
Scenario catalogue concept map
8
Scenario catalogue feedback• So the scenario catalogue is never complete• Begin broadly
9
ODD
Scenario
Situation
t
Scenario catalogue feedback• Big data and machine learning are used to refine the catalogue over time• Simulation and tests are developed to support situations
10
ODD
Scenario
(refined)Scenarios
Situation
t
Product development & validation: Structured combination of three methodologies
Controlled track testing
Simulation
On-road testing & operation
Safely validate sw and control; test interaction; fault injection / limit tests
Test, apply fixes, and accumulate “miles;” examine impact of controllable variables
Identify edge cases / evaluate performance & decisions in complex environments
11
(-)
Real
-wor
ld li
kene
ss
(
+)
(+) Control & repeatability (-)
Build Scenario Database
Test Procedure Database
More info at: http://www.planetm.com/
ACM
Southeast Michigan Automotive Activity and the Smart CorridorMichigan is home to the largest concentration of automotive R&D and manufacturing in the world as well as the largest deployment of Vehicle to Infrastructure (V2I) technology in the United States.
12
A new type of proving ground• Traditional proving grounds still req’d for vehicle development
• e.g. ride & handling, braking, component test, etc.
• AV Proving Ground• Real world physical environments • Infrastructure• Communications• Safely & consistently test scenarios
• Investment through Public – Private Partnerships• Engagement across industry, academia, government
• Test methodology and best practice collaboration• USDOT AVPG• ICPGS• International 3rd party non-profit PG consortium
13
14
Federally-designated AV proving grounds
15
Federally-designated AV proving groundsBuild a community of practice:
Data standards and usage
Information and data sharing
Best practices
Lessons learnt
Foster innovations
Consortium of Internat’l 3rd Party Proving Grounds• ACM• ASTAZero• K-City• Singapore• …
17
18
Urban West
(~20 acres)
UrbanEast
(~20 acres)Rura
l Wes
t
Rural East
(~17 acres)
User-Defined Area (UDA)
Grass Prairie
ResidentialTBD
Highway test environment• 2.4 mile loop• 1.5 mile arterial• 65-70mph• On and Off-ramps• Triple overpasses• Multiple merging
scenarios• Surface color
variation• Lane marking• Signage / gantries• 2/3/4/5 lanes• 700’ tunnel on
bend• Lighting• Environmental
simulation (tbd)• 300m, 500 radius
bends• Multiple pull off
areas w/ fibre optic link
Real world test environments:• Highway• Urban • Rural • Off-road• Commercial • Residential
Campus-Operations:• Test Supt • Convening for
Standards• Cybersec Lab • Education • Tech Park
Network:• DSRC • 4G LTE • 5G • Cloud • Traffic control
Yankee Air Museum
Commercial(parking, docking,
drive-thru, carwash, fueling, etc…)
Off-Road / Two-track
Westbound US-12 decommissioned and turned over to ACM in 2017
Facility Features
21
Tunnel and by-pass
22
Highway ramps and merges
23
Inter-urban arterial roadway
24
• 1.5 miles• Decommissioned
section of US-12• 11’ lanes• Lane-width shoulders• Merge & diverge
options• Gantries• Dynamic signage
(2018)
N
Tri-level overpasses
25
Facility Features
26
27
Washington, D.C.
Recreating complicated real-world urban examples:
28
Recreating complicated real-world urban examples:
Atlanta
29
Recreating complicated real-world urban examples:
near Detroit, MI
30
Recreating complicated real-world urban examples:
Indianapolis, IN
Recreating complicated real-world urban examples:
31
Tampa, Florida
Pedestrian crossings
Road stripes
Road surface color / material
Parking/loading configurations
Edward Straub
Technical Program Director
American Center for Mobility
Willow Run, Ypsilanti, MI
32
Navigating Risk and Reward:
Top Legal Issues in Connected
and Autonomous VehiclesJennifer A. Dukarski @JDukarski
Legal Uncertainty: Legislation,
Regulation and Guidance
• The Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS)
• National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning
Automated Vehicles
• September 20, 2016 Federal Autonomous Vehicle
Policy (USDOT)
• September 12, 2017 Federal Autonomous Vehicle
Policy 2.0 (USDOT)
• Dead: The SELF DRIVE Act (courtesy of Diane
Feinstein, Ed Markey, and Richard Blumenthal)
Data Privacy and Monetization
• The car is fast becoming a repository
of data:
– Biometric data
– Facial recognition software
– Geolocation and behavioral data
– The “emotional car” that “builds a
relationship” with the driver
• The privacy and security implications
– Cybersecurity and data breach
– Personal Health Information (PHI)
• Global implications
– GDPR and cross-border driving
Cybersecurity
• As noted in the Guardian, “[s]elf-driving
cars will prove an irresistible target for
hackers if they ever hit the roads.”
• Although many recent studies
demonstrate the susceptibility of
traditional cars to such cyberattacks, the
stakes may be higher for autonomous
vehicles which could be weaponized or
rendered immobile with ransomware.
Speculative Hacking Litigation:
Cahen v. Toyota• In Cahen v. Toyota Motor Corp., 147 F.Supp.3d 955 (N.D.
Cal. 2015), consumers brought a class action against Ford, General Motors, and Toyota alleging that the vehicles were equipped with technology that was susceptible to being hacked by third parties.
• The court determined that there was no proof that the harm of a hack was “certainly impending” and only showed that it was possible.
• As this harm was not concrete and particularized to the individuals in the suit, the plaintiffs failed to properly show an injury in fact.
• The court also established that the speculative risk of future harm did not lead to an alleged economic injury without proof of more.
Warranty
• Addressing warranty for
components with a life
expectancy less than the life of
the vehicle
• Accepting and negotiating for
liability and indemnification in
agreements, especially in the
mapping, sensing, artificial
intelligence and augmented
reality supply base.
• Preparing for the technical
expertise needed to determine
root cause
Product Liability: Second Verse,
Same as the First
• Negligence: Product manufacturers have a duty to exercise a reasonable degree of care in designing products to be safe when used in used in reasonably foreseeable ways.
• Strict Liability: A company can be held responsible if it manufactures and sells a defective product causing harm to a person or property. Strict liability includes:
– Design Defects
– Manufacturing Defects
– Failure to Warn
• Breach of Warranty: Assurances, either express or implied, that goods are of sufficient quality.
• Misrepresentation: Reliance on false or misleading information that leads to harm.
Liability: Users and Level 3
Autonomy
• What if a user/driver deactivates the system?
• What if a user fails to properly maintain the system or update software?
• What will be the impact of more in-vehicle distractions?
• Will the long-term “loss of driving experience” impact liability in Level 3 vehicles?
Vehicle Accidents, EDR and the
Tesla Model X: You Can’t Fool Us
“Everyone makes mistakes,
and many people try to
cover them up. But if you try
to hide an error made behind
the wheel of a car made by
Tesla Motors, you are liable to
be caught out. In fact, trying
to hide what really happened
in any kind of car accident
could soon become just
about impossible.”
Tom Simonite, Tesla Knows When a
Crash Is Your Fault, and Other
Carmakers Soon Will, Too, MIT
Technology Review, June 8, 2016.
• In 2016, the owner of a Tesla Model X asserted the vehicle suddenly accelerated into a building
• Tesla used its data to confirm that “consistent with the driver’s actions, the vehicle applied torque and accelerated as instructed.”
• Tesla confirmed the vehicle was in manual mode and Autopilot was not engaged.
CAR CAV Working Group • January 30th • 2018
Michigan DOT CAV Program Updates
Collin Castle (MDOT)
2017 Connected and Automated Vehicle ProgramStrategic Plan
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Goal 1: Serve as a national model to catalyze CAV deployment
Goal 2: Establish Foundational systems to support wide-scale CAV deployment
Goal 3: Make Michigan the go-to state for CAV research and development
Goal 4: Accelerate CAV benefits to users
Goal 5: Exploit mutual benefit opportunities between CAV tech and other department business processes/objectives
Goal 6: Use Michigan experience to lead dialogue on national standards and best practices
PROGRAM GOALS
Infrastructure Deployment
Expansion underway to create one of the largest CV infrastructure deployments in the world
IndustryPartnerships
Partnering with and supporting a range of
industry leaders to advance CAV technology, including:
Initial Pilot Applications2 V2I Applications
Intersection Safety Applications
Work Zone Warning/ Management
Road Weather Management
Pavement Condition
Connected Signals Policy
All new or upgraded traffic signals on the MDOT system will be CV-enabled going forward
Work Zone Management
Harmonize work zone data across jurisdictional boundaries
Share via local and wide area distribution (DSRC, API, etc.)
Coordinating Efforts with FHWA Work Zone Data Harmonization
MDOT developing system to support:
Data Collection
Data Management
Data Distribution
Data Elements Including:• Speed Limit• Lane and Ramp Closures• Workers Present• Truck Restrictions• MAP
Data Entry Portal for Construction Personnel
Data Collection/ProcessingMessage
Development
DSRC
DVI
!Mobile Device
CellularSatellite
Internet(API)
Work Zone Data Input
Cooperative Research
Coalition for Safety Sooner
Letter Signed by 22 Infrastructure Owner Operators (IOO) Directors/Commissioners
Message: DSRC is available today to save lives
Waiting for the next technology is a missed opportunity
Addressed to relevant Federal Decision makers
AV Legislative Actions: MI Senate Bills
Signed into Law by Governor Snyder
Led the way to opening Michigan up for the business of automated vehicles
Legislation Introduced by Senators
• Mike Kowall (R-White Lake)• Rebekah Warren (D-Ann Arbor)• Ken Horn (R-Frankenmuth)
TARDEC
PLATOONING
TESTING
Contact Information
Collin Castle, P.E.ITS Program Manager
PLANET M Websitewww.planetm.com
26th Annual Intelligent Ground Vehicle Competition (IGVC)
1-4 June 2018 Oakland University
Self Drive Overview
Jerry Lane IGVC Co-Chairman & [email protected] 586-980-1142
IGVC & Self Drive Background
• Established 1992 by Association for Unmanned Vehicle Systems International, • 1st Annual Competition 1993
• Only FHWA & ITS interest -- minimal automotive interest• Autonomous Driving for Defense & Automotive • Robotic Objectives
• Defense Unmanned Systems• Automotive Intelligent Vehicles
• College & University Student Teams: Undergraduate & Graduate• Co-Hosted by Oakland University, US Army TARDEC & AUVSI Great Lakes Chapter• Past 25 years competed 500+ Teams, 80+ Universities and 7 Countries
• As automotive smart vehicle industry advanced• more advanced & relevant IGVC platforms & challenges were Identified
2017 Spec 2 Teams
25 YearsIGVC Student Preparation
2017 IGVC Teams
Vehicle University Vehicle University
SeDriCa
Indian Institute of Technology - Bombay,
INDIA BEAST Florida Institute of Technology
Sparky Roger Williams University PANthAR (Spec 2-withdrawn) Florida Institute of Technology
Charlie Michigan Technological University Jaymi Georgia Institute of Technology
Lazarus Bob Jones University iWheels 3 Lawrence Technological University
Orange 2017 Hosei University
MOBIS-Dataspeed-LTU (Spec
2) Lawrence Technological University
DOLLE Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University AMOS III Rochester Institute of Technology
Daksh Indian Institute of Technology - Kanpur Apollo II CART, Inc. at Bluefield State College
Night Owl Kennesaw State University M.A.S.K. Lawrence Technological University
Penguino Oakland University Acadia The College of New Jersey
SubaRoo The University of Akron Dokalman University of Cincinnati
SQUIRREL Trinity College OHM 5.0 University of Michigan Dearborn
Betsy Universite' de Moncton Great Uncle ViktoRAS University of Texas at Austin
Bender Boise State University Jack Frost University of British Columbia
Iggy United States Military Academy Abhiyaan
Indian Institute of Technology -
Madras
R.E.V.O. University of Illinois at Chicago Spec 2 Vehicle Bob Jones University
Continental-OU (Spec 2) Oakland University Autobee Istanbul Technical University
Cilantro Old Dominion University Lancebot University of Detroit Mercy
Octagon v3.0 Oakland University
IGVC Challenge Evolution
History
1993 - 2012 Autonomous Challenge
1994 Design Competition
1999 – 2000 Road Debris Course
1999 – 2001, 2003 Follower The Leader
2001 – 2012 Navigation Challenge
2006 – 2013 JAUS Challenge
2013 – Auto-Nav Challenge: Basic & Advanced Courses
2014 – IOP Challenge
2107 – Auto Nav Enhanced
2017 – Spec 2 Demo
2018 – Self Drive (Spec 2) Challenge
Self Drive Design Specifications
http://www.igvc.org/spec2.htm
Entries must conform to the following specifications :•FMVSS 500 Platform•Design: Side by Side 2-person four-wheel ground vehicle •Type of Vehicle: Electrical, no gas•Maximum Length: 115 in (Polaris Gem e2 is 103 in, Renault Twizy is 91 in)•Maximum Width: 60 in (Polaris Gem e2 is 55.5 in, Renault Twizy is 47 in)•Maximum Height: 75 in (Polaris Gem e2 is 73 in, Renault Twizy is 57 in)•Maximum Weight: 1500 lbs•Maximum Speed: Speed is limited to 5 mph in 2018
•Speed will increase as safety features of Self-Drive course are developed. •Mechanical E-stop Location: The E-Stop button must be a push to stop, red, one inch dia. •Wireless E-Stop must be effective for a minimum of 100 feet. •Vehicle E-stops must be hardware based and not controlled through software. •Safety Light: must have easily identified brake lights red in color and reverse lights yellow
• A strobe light mounted on roof and activated when the vehicle is under robotic control.•Teams may build their own drive-by-wire kits or use off the shelf drive-by-wire solutions :
•TORC Robotics, •Dataspeed, •AutonomousStuff •Clearpath Robotics.
•FMVSS-500 Vehicle Example - Polaris GEM e2
2017 Spec 2 Demo Run on grass
http://www.gl-systems-technology.net/spec-2-demo-run-igvc.html
Self Dive Qualification & Safety Check
• Length: • Width: • Height: • Weight: • Mechanical E-stop: • Wireless E-Stop: • Passenger(s) Safety:
• Safety Light: • Speed: Min & Max• Lane Following: • Obstacle Avoidance: • Waypoint Navigation:
Qualification the vehicle must pass or perform all of the following criteria:
2018 Self Drive Course
Function Testing
Intersection Testing. Lane KeepingIntersection Testing. Left TurnIntersection Testing. Right TurnParking. Pull OutParking. Pull InParking. ParallelObstructed/ Unobstructed pedestrian detectionPedestrian & Obstacle detection. Lane ChangingMergingCurved Road evaluation. Lane KeepingCurved Road evaluation. Lane ChangingPothole detection
Lane Keeping & Turns
Lane Keeping Right TurnLeft Turn
Parking
Pullout ParallelPullin
Obstructed/ Unobstructed pedestrian detection
Pedestrian & Obstacle detection. Lane
Changing
. Curved Road Evaluation.
Lane Keeping & Lane Changing
Merging & Pothole detection
IGVC Organizing & Technical Team
• Professor KaC Cheok: Oakland University, Co-Chairman & Co-Founder• Bernard Theisen: US Army TARDEC Robotics, Co-Chairman• Jerry Lane: Great Lakes Systems &Tech, Co-Chairman & Co-Founder• Andrew Kosinski: US Army TARDEC Robotics, Operations Director• Steve Gadzinski: Ford (Ret) , Chief Design Judge• Matt Skalny: US Army TARDEC Robotics, Interoperability Chief Judge• Jane Tarakhovsky: Hyundai Mobis, Self Drive Chairman• Markhanna McBurrows: Oakland University(Ret), Administrative
2017 Sponsors2017 IGVC Sponsors
New 2018 Sponsors to date
Joining IGVC
• Open JAUS• Robotic Research Corp.
Visit our Website
Follow Us on Twitter
#IGVC