mice cm16, ral, 11 oct 2006v. palladino plans for mice pi detectors & shielding mice cm16, ral...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
215 views
TRANSCRIPT
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
Plans for MICE PI detectors
& Shielding
MICE CM16, RAL Oct 11, 2006V. Palladino, Univ & INFN Napoli
for the small PID team Bonesini, Chimenti, Cremaldi, Giannini, Graulich,
Gregoire, Karazdov, Orestano, Sandstrom, Summers, Torun, Tortora, Tsenov, and more
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
PID Summary Talk at CM16 in Fermilab the picture Intense test beam activity in the summer (FNAL & Frascati) comforted the basic design of all detector components Upstream setup converging towards review (Thu & Fri )
TOF0, 2 planes 48*48 cm2 CKOV I TOFI, 2 planes supported by thin shield slab 42*42 cm2 seems enough, radii of holes accordingly thick shield slab, magnetically connected to small (“GG cage”)
Downstream setup converging towards a consensual design push to much larger apertures quenched since CM15
thick shield slab, magnetically connected to small (“GG cage”) hole 25 to 30 cm radius, Rikard will say TOFII, 2 planes supported by thin shield slab hole 30 to 35 cm radius, Rikard will say detector 60*60 cm2 EMCal 1) Kloe light (KL) preshower plane 90*90 cm2 2) fully active scintillator catcher hole 100*100 cm2 or so Getting also close to finally simulate it all adequately
veryusefuleveningyesterday
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
fully Active Scintillator
The new emerging layout
as compact as possible
activepreshower
Downnstream Up&Downnstream
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
Only TOF II (and I) within a cageEMCal completely outside !
Virostek wallunchanged
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
beautifully small fields
ie zero, with additional local shield
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
This seems to be why, unfortunately …..
will cost us money ….. CFDs or ADCs
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
Downstream:baselines for EMCal
Finally! To be optimized now
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
Only TOF II (and I) within a cageEMCal completely outside !
Virostek wallunchanged
as compact as possibleSW right behind KL
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
Staging “philosophy”In the, likely, case that funding will be limited
NO resources should be wasted
with interim temporary solution
1 plane of TOF0 TOF I TOF II
are the highest priority. Full aperture, cover entire phase space, √2 worse performance acceptable for quite a while Must deploy resources accordingly Second planes next priority, except for one counter (cross calibration) per station
MICE CM16, RAL, 11 Oct 2006 V. Palladino
CM16 may have finally brought us a consensual baseline
also for the downstream setup
Thanks to all those that helped clearing the picture
A downstream review appears closer today
Funding remains a serious threat
Focus now on updating the TRD chapter
G4MICE runs with proper geometry files and field maps