m.g. edited science. courtroom hydrological ltd. sons.per

10
58 Model Validalion 5 Models in the Courtroom E. SCOTT BAIR Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio State University, USA 5.1 INTRODUCTION Most scientists and engineers will never enter a courtroom as a party in a lawsuit. Most of us may never provide expert testimony in a trial. Yet trial by jury is one of the most valued and highly defended rights guaranteed to citizens of the United States by the US Constitution. It is tbe hallmark of tbe US system ofjustice. Although the Anglo-American system ofjurisprudence is rooted in the 'inquisitions' ordered by William the Cooqueror in 11th century Eogland to determine the countryside's wealth and population (Van Dyke 1987), the appearance of hy- drologic models in courtrooms is obviously a latc 20th century phenomenon. Modern hydrologic models founded on solving partial differential equations using numerical methods also can be traced to England. Shaw and Southwell (1941) may have been the first to use a finite-differeoce model to address a groundwater seepage problem. Advances in numerical methods and in our theoretical and applied knowledge over the past 30 years combined with continuous improvement in the ease. cost and power of computers have enabled hydrologists to address problems previously considered intractable. The ability to model complex hydrology combined with federal and state environmental laws promulgated in the laller part of the 20th century to protect water supplies, manage waste handling, and improve waste disposal have caused US hydrologists to participate in various types oflitigation. As expert witnesses, we may testify in lawsuits filed under violations of environmental statutes or tort laws (laws relating to wilful or negligent damage or injury). In 1995, US District Courts began over 45000 new cases dealing with tort actions and environmental matters (US Department of Commerce 1997, p. 216). Although most of these cases do not involve hydrologic issues or require testimony from hydrologic experts, and only 5% actually go to trial (Grossman and Vaughn 1999), the statistics reveal the zeal we Americans have for resolving conflict by litigation. In court, as in other applications, hydrologic models are used to evaluate historic hydrologic events or conditions, and are used to predict future hydrologic events or conditions. In both cases,lhe credibility of the model rests in the subjectivejudgment of ajury or ajudge. Ideally, we, the scientists and engineers, would like the jury or judge to first decide whether the model is a reasonable representation ef the real hydrologic system and then determine whether the predictive simulations are reasonable based on the ability of the model to reproduce known (measured) physical states of the flow system. It is unlikely, however, that this type of sequential, critical evaluation will occur. It is more likely that the jury or judge will simply assess the overall believability of the scientific testimony. Terms such as validate and verify that suggest or imply realism or truth are used to paint righteous images of models for the jury or judge. As a consequence, these common modelling terms and the procedures hydrologists use to substanti- ate their conclusions are often highly contested by the opposing party. Model Validalio,,: Per.spe<:live.sln Hydrological Science. Edited by M.G. Anderson and P.O. Bates. C 2001 John Wiley & Sons. Ltd. It has been said that cross-examination is the most powerful tool in the US legal system for eliciting truth from witnesses. It bas also been said that cross-examination by harassment is ODe of lhe greatest impediments to truth (Gerber 1987). For a hydrologic modeller, cross- examination is guaranteed to be a challenging experience regardless of the degree of validity. amount of veracity, or the number of confirming observations supporting the model and its predictions. My objectives in writing this chapter are to describe issues. some substantive and some philosophic, that arise in the courtroom and bear on (1) the use and models by expert witnesses, and (2) the evaluation of these models and their results by a Jury or judge. In so doing, I will use the events surrounding a famous federal trial (Anne Anderson et v. W.R. Grace & Company and Beorrice Foods, Inc.) and the testimony of three expert hydrologtsts who participated in that trial to examine the interface between science and the US legal system. 5.2 SCIENTIFIC METHODS IN COURT Hydrologists, like most other witnesses, are visitors in the legal arena. The vocabulary and rules used by lawyers may seem foreign to us, but the legal procedures that can eventually place a plaintiff's complaint before a jury are similar to the general scientific methods we use to develop and test hypotheses. As a result, the path a lawsuit takes through the Amencan legal system IS not unlike the path hydrologic research takes through the scientific community. Although scientists do not necessarily agree on all the compOnents that comprise the scientific method. most agree that the scientific method is a set of informal rules for formulating concepts, conducting experiments, making observations, developing inferences, and then testing these inferences by further experimentation and observation (Peters 1996). Hydrologic modellers commonly follow a similar set of procedures in constructing and testing their mathematical models. Figure 5.1 shows the general steps in the scientific method, procedures followed by hydrologic modellers, and their similarities to the path a civil lawsuit follows through the American legal system. In the latter scheme, a perceived injustice leads to identification of possible causation and the filing of a legal complaint by a plaintiff. In the scientific method, this is analogous to initial observations leading to the formulation of a question and the development of a hypoth- esis. The scientific hypothesis and the legal complaint both represent queries that have been framed but need to be tested and resolved. In a parallel sense, they are similar to the statement of purpose of a hydrologic model and the development of a conceptual framework of the flow system. . Pre-trial discovery, lhe phase of a lawsuit when information is acquired and soliClted,legal strategies are formulated, and professional opinions are developed, stated and queried, corre- sponds to the steps in the scientific method where experiments are planned and executed, observations recorded, and the results analysed to see whether the experimental data support or refute the hypothesis. In a hydrologic model, these steps are analogous to the calibration of the model, wherein measured water levels and/or discharges are compared to simulated values to determine how well the model reproduces the measured physical state of the system. In a trial, discovered evidence is presented by lay witnesses and expert witnesses during direct examination and then is scrutinised by the opposition during cross-examination. Ajury or judge makes the final deliberations regarding acceptance or rejection ofthe legal complaint. At the end of the trial process, evaluation of the testimony by the jury or judge is immediate and the final decision to accept or reject the plaintiff's complaint is made by non·experts and is reached quickly.

Upload: others

Post on 28-Nov-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

58M

odel

Val

idal

ion

5M

od

els

inth

eC

ou

rtro

om

E.

SC

OT

TB

AIR

De

pa

rtm

en

tofG

eo

log

ica

lSci

en

ces,

Oh

ioS

tate

Uni

vers

ity,

US

A

5.1

INT

RO

DU

CT

ION

Mos

tsc

ient

ists

and

engi

neer

sw

illne

ver

ente

ra

cour

troo

mas

apa

rty

ina

law

suit.

Mos

tof

usm

ayne

ver

prov

ide

expe

rtte

stim

ony

ina

tria

l.Y

ettr

ial

byju

ryis

one

ofth

em

ost

valu

edan

dhi

ghly

defe

nded

righ

tsgu

aran

teed

toci

tizen

sof

the

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

byth

eU

SC

onst

itut

ion.

Itis

tbe

hall

mar

kof

tbe

US

syst

emof

just

ice.

Alt

houg

hth

eA

nglo

-Am

eric

ansy

stem

ofju

risp

rude

nce

isro

oted

inth

e'in

quis

itio

ns'o

rder

edby

Wil

liam

the

Coo

quer

orin

11th

cent

ury

Eog

land

tode

term

ine

the

coun

trys

ide'

sw

ealt

han

dpo

pula

tion

(Van

Dyk

e19

87),

the

appe

aran

ceof

hy­

drol

ogic

mod

els

inco

urtr

oom

sis

obvi

ousl

ya

latc

20th

cent

ury

phen

omen

on.

Mod

ern

hydr

olog

icm

odel

sfo

unde

don

solv

ing

part

iald

iffer

entia

lequ

atio

nsus

ing

num

eric

alm

etho

dsal

soca

nbe

trac

edto

Eng

land

.S

haw

and

Sou

thw

ell(

1941

)m

ayha

vebe

enth

efi

rst

tous

ea

finite

-diff

ereo

cem

odel

toad

dres

sa

grou

ndw

ater

seep

age

prob

lem

.Adv

ance

sin

num

eric

alm

etho

dsan

din

our

theo

reti

cal

and

appl

ied

know

ledg

eov

erth

epa

st30

year

sco

mbi

ned

wit

hco

ntin

uous

impr

ovem

ent i

nth

eea

se.c

ost

and

pow

erof

com

pute

rsha

veen

able

dhy

drol

ogis

tsto

addr

ess

prob

lem

spr

evio

usly

cons

ider

edin

trac

tabl

e.T

heab

ilit

yto

mod

elco

mpl

exhy

drol

ogy

com

bine

dw

ithfe

dera

lan

dst

ate

envi

ronm

enta

lla

ws

prom

ulga

ted

inth

ela

ller

part

ofth

e20

thce

ntur

yto

prot

ect

wat

ersu

pplie

s,m

anag

ew

aste

hand

ling,

and

impr

ove

was

tedi

spos

alha

veca

used

US

hydr

olog

ists

topa

rtic

ipat

ein

vari

ous

type

sof

liti

gati

on.A

sex

pert

witn

esse

s,w

em

ayte

stify

inla

wsu

itsfil

edun

der

viol

atio

nsof

envi

ronm

enta

lsta

tute

sor

tort

law

s(la

ws

rela

ting

tow

ilful

orne

glig

ent

dam

age

or

inju

ry).

In19

95,U

SD

istr

ictC

ourt

sbe

gan

over

4500

0ne

wca

ses

deal

ing

with

tort

acti

ons

and

envi

ronm

enta

lm

atte

rs(U

SD

epar

tmen

tof

Com

mer

ce19

97,

p.21

6).A

lthou

ghm

ost

ofth

ese

case

sdo

not

invo

lve

hydr

olog

icis

sues

orre

quir

ete

stim

ony

from

hydr

olog

icex

pert

s,an

don

ly5%

actu

ally

goto

tria

l(G

ross

man

and

Vau

ghn

1999

),th

est

atis

tics

reve

alth

eze

alw

eA

mer

ican

sha

vefo

rre

solv

ing

conf

lict

bylit

igat

ion.

Inco

urt,

asin

othe

rap

plic

atio

ns,h

ydro

logi

cm

odel

sar

eus

edto

eval

uate

hist

oric

hydr

olog

icev

ents

orco

ndit

ions

,and

are

used

topr

edic

tfu

ture

hydr

olog

icev

ents

orco

ndit

ions

.In

both

case

s,lh

ecr

edib

ilit

yof

the

mod

elre

sts

inth

esu

bjec

tive

judg

men

tof a

jury

oraj

udge

.Ide

ally

,we,

the

scie

ntis

tsan

den

gine

ers,

wou

ldlik

eth

eju

ryor

judg

eto

first

deci

dew

heth

erth

em

odel

isa

reas

onab

lere

pres

enta

tion

efth

ere

alhy

drol

ogic

syst

eman

dth

ende

term

ine

whe

ther

the

pred

ictiv

esi

mul

atio

nsar

ere

ason

able

base

don

the

abili

tyof

the

mod

elto

repr

oduc

ekn

own

(mea

sure

d)ph

ysic

alst

ates

ofth

eflo

wsy

stem

.Iti

sun

likel

y,ho

wev

er,t

hatt

his

type

ofse

quen

tial

,cr

itic

alev

alua

tion

will

occu

r.It

ism

ore

likel

yth

atth

eju

ryo

rjud

gew

illsi

mpl

yas

sess

the

over

all

belie

vabi

lity

ofth

esc

ient

ific

test

imon

y.T

erm

ssu

chas

valid

ate

and

veri

fyth

atsu

gges

tor

impl

yre

alis

mor

trut

har

eus

edto

pain

tri

ghte

ous

imag

esof

mod

els

for

the

jury

orju

dge.

As

aco

nseq

uenc

e,th

ese

com

mon

mod

ellin

gte

rms

and

the

proc

edur

eshy

drol

ogis

tsus

eto

subs

tant

i­at

eth

eir

conc

lusi

ons

are

ofte

nhi

ghly

cont

este

dby

the

oppo

sing

part

y.

Mod

elV

alid

alio

,,:Pe

r.spe

<:liv

e.sln

Hyd

rolo

gica

lSci

ence

.Edi

ted

byM

.G.A

nder

son

and

P.O

.Bat

es.

C20

01Jo

hnW

iley

&So

ns.L

td.

Itha

sbe

ensa

idth

atcr

oss-

exam

inat

ion

isth

em

ost

pow

erfu

lto

olin

the

US

lega

lsy

stem

for

elic

itin

gtr

uth

from

witn

esse

s.It

bas

also

been

said

that

cros

s-ex

amin

atio

nby

hara

ssm

ent

isO

De

oflh

egr

eate

stim

pedi

men

tsto

trut

h(G

erbe

r19

87).

Fo

ra

hydr

olog

icm

odel

ler,

cros

s­ex

amin

atio

nis

guar

ante

edto

bea

chal

leng

ing

expe

rien

cere

gard

less

ofth

ede

gree

ofva

lidity

.am

ount

ofve

raci

ty,

orth

enu

mbe

rof

conf

irm

ing

obse

rvat

ions

supp

orti

ngth

em

odel

and

itspr

edic

tions

.M

yob

ject

ives

inw

ritin

gth

isch

apte

rar

eto

desc

ribe

issu

es.

som

esu

bsta

ntiv

ean

dso

me

philo

soph

ic,t

hat

aris

ein

the

cour

troo

man

dbe

aron

(1)

the

use

and

prese~tationofhyd~ologic

mod

els

byex

pert

witn

esse

s,an

d(2

)the

eval

uati

onof

thes

em

odel

san

dth

eir

resu

ltsby

aJu

ryor

judg

e.In

sodo

ing,

Iw

illus

eth

eev

ents

surr

ound

ing

afa

mou

sfe

dera

ltri

al(A

nne

And

erso

net

a~.

v.W

.R.

Gra

ce&

Com

pany

and

Beo

rric

eF

oods

,Inc

.)an

dth

ete

stim

ony

ofth

ree

expe

rthy

drol

ogts

tsw

hopa

rtic

ipat

edin

that

tria

lto

exam

ine

the

inte

rfac

ebe

twee

nsc

ienc

ean

dth

eU

Sle

gals

yste

m.

5.2

SC

IEN

TIF

ICM

ET

HO

DS

INC

OU

RT

Hyd

rolo

gist

s,lik

em

ost

othe

rw

itnes

ses,

are

visi

tors

inth

ele

gala

rena

.The

voca

bula

ryan

dru

les

used

byla

wye

rsm

ayse

emfo

reig

nto

us,

but

the

lega

lpr

oced

ures

that

can

even

tual

lypl

ace

apl

aint

iff's

com

plai

ntbe

fore

aju

ryar

esi

mil

arto

the

gene

rals

cien

tific

met

hods

we

use

tode

velo

pan

dte

sthy

poth

eses

.A

sa

resu

lt,th

epa

tha

law

suit

take

sth

roug

hth

eA

men

can

lega

lsys

tem

IS

not

unli

keth

epa

thhy

drol

ogic

rese

arch

take

sth

roug

hth

esc

ient

ific

com

mun

ity.

Alt

houg

hsc

ient

ists

dono

tne

cess

arily

agre

eon

all

the

com

pOne

nts

that

com

pris

eth

esc

ient

ific

met

hod.

mos

tag

ree

that

the

scie

ntifi

cm

etho

dis

ase

tof

info

rmal

rule

sfo

rfo

rmul

atin

gco

ncep

ts,

cond

ucti

ngex

peri

men

ts,

mak

ing

obse

rvat

ions

,de

velo

ping

infe

renc

es,

and

then

test

ing

thes

ein

fere

nces

byfu

rthe

rex

peri

men

tati

onan

dob

serv

atio

n(P

eter

s19

96).

Hyd

rolo

gic

mod

elle

rsco

mm

only

follo

wa

sim

ilar

set

ofpr

oced

ures

inco

nstr

ucti

ngan

dte

stin

gth

eir

mat

hem

atic

alm

odel

s.F

igur

e5.

1sh

ows

the

gene

rals

teps

inth

esc

ient

ific

met

hod,

proc

edur

esfo

llow

edby

hydr

olog

icm

odel

lers

,and

thei

rsi

mila

ritie

sto

the

path

aci

vil

law

suit

follo

ws

thro

ugh

the

Am

eric

anle

gal

syst

em.

Inth

ela

tter

sche

me,

ape

rcei

ved

inju

stic

ele

ads

toid

entif

icat

ion

ofpo

ssib

leca

usat

ion

and

the

filin

gof

ale

gal

com

plai

ntby

apl

aint

iff.

Inth

esc

ient

ific

met

hod,

this

isan

alog

ous

toin

itial

obse

rvat

ions

lead

ing

toth

efo

rmul

atio

nof

aqu

esti

onan

dth

ede

velo

pmen

tof

ahy

poth

­es

is.

The

scie

ntif

ichy

poth

esis

and

the

lega

lco

mpl

aint

both

repr

esen

tqu

erie

sth

atha

vebe

enfr

amed

but

need

tobe

test

edan

dre

solv

ed.I

na

para

llels

ense

,the

yar

esi

mila

rto

the

stat

emen

tof

purp

ose

ofa

hydr

olog

icm

odel

and

the

deve

lopm

ent

ofa

conc

eptu

alfr

amew

ork

ofth

eflo

wsy

stem

..

Pre

-tri

aldi

scov

ery,

lhe

phas

eof

ala

wsu

itw

hen

info

rmat

ion

isac

quir

edan

dso

liC

lted

,lega

lst

rate

gies

are

form

ulat

ed,

and

prof

essi

onal

opin

ions

are

deve

lope

d,st

ated

and

quer

ied,

corr

e­sp

onds

toth

est

eps

inth

esc

ient

ific

met

hod

whe

reex

peri

men

tsar

epl

anne

dan

dex

ecut

ed,

obse

rvat

ions

reco

rded

, and

the

resu

ltsan

alys

edto

see

whe

ther

the

expe

rim

enta

ldat

asu

ppor

tor

refu

teth

ehy

poth

esis

.In

ahy

drol

ogic

mod

el,t

hese

step

sar

ean

alog

ous

toth

eca

libr

atio

nof

the

mod

el,

whe

rein

mea

sure

dw

ater

leve

lsan

d/or

disc

harg

esar

eco

mpa

red

tosi

mul

ated

valu

esto

dete

rmin

eho

ww

ell

the

mod

elre

prod

uces

the

mea

sure

dph

ysic

alst

ate

ofth

esy

stem

.In

atr

ial,

disc

over

edev

iden

ceis

pres

ente

dby

lay

witn

esse

san

dex

pert

witn

esse

sdu

ring

dire

ctex

amin

atio

nan

dth

enis

scru

tinis

edby

the

oppo

siti

ondu

ring

cros

s-ex

amin

atio

n.A

jury

orju

dge

mak

esth

efin

alde

liber

atio

nsre

gard

ing

acce

ptan

ceor

reje

ctio

nof

the

lega

lcom

plai

nt.A

tthe

end

ofth

etr

ial

proc

ess,

eval

uati

onof

the

test

imon

yby

the

jury

orju

dge

isim

med

iate

and

the

final

deci

sion

toac

cept

orre

ject

the

plai

ntiff

'sco

mpl

aint

ism

ade

byno

n·ex

pert

san

dis

reac

hed

quic

kly.

Mod

els

Inth

eC

ourt

room

5960

Mod

elV

alid

atio

n

Sci

enti

fic

Met

hod

Hy

dro

log

icM

od

elC

ivil

Law

suit

Init

ial

obse

rvat

ions

Per

ceiv

edin

just

ice

••

Def

me

pUfl

lose

Fon

nula

tequ

esti

onS

ugge

stca

usat

ion

••

•C

once

ptua

lize

mod

elD

evel

ophy

poth

esis

Fil

eco

mpl

aint

••••

•C

alib

rati

onto

Exp

erim

enta

tion

toD

isco

very

tote

stco

ncep

tual

izat

ion

test

hyp

othe

sis

gath

erin

form

atio

n

••••

•H

isto

cym

atch

ing

toC

oncl

usio

nsto

Tri

alto

OI:c

epto

rrej

ect

OI:c

epto

rre

ject

OI:c

epto

rre

ject

mod

elhy

poth

esis

test

imon

y

••

•P

redi

ctiv

esi

mul

atio

nsto

Jour

nalr

evie

wto

Jury

deli

bera

tion

toas

sess

caus

ality

dete

rmin

eac

cept

abi1

ityas

sess

liab

ilit

yfo

rpu

blic

atio

n •E

valu

atio

nby

scie

ntif

icco

mm

unit

yto

acce

ptor

reje

cthy

poth

esis

Fig

ure

5.1

Sim

ilar

itie

sam

ong

the

scla

ntlf

lcm

etho

d,tr

ial

proc

edur

esan

dhy

drol

ogic

mod

elco

nstr

uctio

n

Inth

esc

ient

ific

aren

a,th

eex

peri

men

tal

data

are

anal

ysed

aDd

conc

lusi

ons

(infe

renc

es)

are

draw

nw

heth

erto

acce

pto

rre

ject

the

hypo

thes

is.If

the

hypo

thes

isis

acce

pted

,th

ew

ork

isco

mm

only

subm

itted

for

publ

icat

ion

ina

prof

essi

onal

jour

nal

whe

reit

issc

rutin

ised

bype

erre

view

ers

toas

sess

its

acce

ptab

ilit

yfo

rpu

blic

atio

n.If

the

wor

kis

acce

pted

for

publ

icat

ion,

the

grea

ter

scie

ntif

icco

mm

unit

ym

akes

the

fina

lac

cept

ance

or

reje

ctio

nof

the

hypo

thes

is.

In

cont

rast

toth

ele

galp

roce

ss,e

valu

atio

no

fpro

fess

iona

lopi

nion

sth

roug

hth

esc

ient

ific

proc

essi

ssl

ow,

ism

ade

byfe

llow

expe

rts,

and

the

final

deci

sion

may

not

bere

ache

dfo

rye

ars

asot

her

scie

ntis

tstr

yto

repl

icat

eth

ew

ork

(Bai

ran

dW

ood

1999

).A

lthou

ghth

ere

are

sim

ilari

ties

betw

een

scie

nce

and

law

,th

ere

are

also

diff

eren

ces.

Am

ajor

diff

eren

ceis

inth

etim

esp

ent

eval

uati

ngw

heth

erto

acce

ptor

reje

ctth

ehy

poth

esis

,th

ete

stim

ony

and

the

mod

el(F

igur

e5.

1).D

elib

erat

ions

bya

jury

over

test

imon

ypr

esen

ted

ina

tria

lm

ayta

keho

urs,

som

etim

esda

ys,o

nra

reoc

casi

ons

wee

ks.

Eva

luat

ion

byth

egr

eate

rsc

ient

ific

com

mun

ity

ofne

wco

ncep

tspu

blis

hed

ina

jour

nal

may

take

mon

ths

toye

ars,

som

etim

esde

cade

s.A

noth

erdi

ffer

ence

isth

atth

eju

ryis

mad

eup

of'n

on-e

xper

tsw

hose

com

mon

know

l­ed

geis

relie

dup

onto

rend

eran

impa

rtia

lju

dgm

ent,

whe

reas

the

scie

ntifi

cco

mm

unity

isco

mpr

ised

orco

mpe

ting

scie

ntis

tsw

hose

expe

rtis

eis

relie

dup

onto

repe

atth

eex

peri

men

tsan

dva

lidat

eor

reje

ctth

ew

ork.

Ath

ird

diff

eren

ceis

that

tlie

scie

ntifi

cm

etho

dra

cilit

ates

reed

back

betw

een

hypo

thes

isde

velo

pmen

t,de

sign

and

exec

utio

nor

expe

rim

ents

,an

dro

rmul

atio

nor

conc

lusi

ons.

The

path

ora

civi

lla

wsu

itis

one

dire

ctio

nal

(see

Figu

re5.

1),

alth

ough

itca

nbe

stop

ped

byse

ttle

men

tor

the

verd

ict

over

turn

edon

appe

al.

Fed

eral

Judg

eL

ynn

N.

Hug

hes

expr

esse

dth

edi

ffer

ence

sas

follo

ws:

Scie

ntifi

cin

vest

igat

ion

isa

long

-ter

mpu

rsui

tfo

cuse

dat

unde

rsta

ndin

gou

rex

peri

ence

s,w

here

asju

risp

rude

ntia

linv

estig

atio

nis

ash

ort-

term

purs

uit

focu

sed

atre

solv

ing

aco

nflic

tbe

twee

ntw

oor

mor

epa

rtie

s.Sc

ienc

eha

sth

efr

eedo

mof

the

even

tual

ityof

findi

ngan

swer

san

dth

ege

nera

lity

ofap

plic

atio

n,w

here

asth

ela

wha

sth

eco

nstr

aint

so

fthe

imm

edia

cyof

reso

lutio

nan

dth

epa

rtic

ular

ityof

each

case

...C

ourt

sar

ea

soci

etal

mec

hani

smfo

rre

solv

ing

disp

utes

inw

hich

the

conc

epts

oftr

uth

and

just

ice

are

sign

ifica

ntbu

tsec

onda

ry.A

lthou

ghbo

thsc

ienc

ean

dth

ela

wse

ekth

etr

uth,

both

also

mus

tre

lyon

inco

mpl

ete

data

and

both

also

mus

top

erat

eun

der

unce

rtai

nty.

Scie

nce

and

law

dono

t,th

en,h

ave

com

petin

gvi

sion

sof

trut

h.R

athe

r,kn

owle

dge

com

pete

sw

ithre

solu

tion

...W

ene

edto

fitth

epr

oduc

tofs

cien

cein

toth

eta

skof

cour

ts.

(Hug

hes

(999

)

5.3

SC

IEN

TIS

TS

INA

NA

DV

ER

SA

RIA

LL

EG

AL

SY

ST

EM

Hyd

rolo

gist

s,lik

em

ost

appl

ied

scie

ntis

ts,a

reac

cust

omed

toconstruct~g

mod

els

with

inhe

rent

unce

rtai

nty

(Vos

s19

98).

Itis

high

lyun

usua

lfor

usno

tto

deal

with

spar

sean

d/or

nois

yda

ta.T

hege

nera

lpu

blic

look

sto

scie

ntis

tsto

unra

vel

and

expl

ain

the

phys

ical

,che

mic

alan

dbi

olog

ical

proc

esse

sth

atop

erat

eda

y-to

-day

with

inou

rre

alm

.T

hepu

blic

,ho

wev

er,

isac

cust

omed

tosc

ient

ists

desc

ribi

ngth

ese

proc

esse

sin

term

sor

law

s-

New

ton'

sL

aws

ofM

otio

n,th

eL

aws

orT

herm

odyn

amic

s,O

hm's

Law

,Sne

ll's

Law

,Dar

cy's

Law

,etc

.In

allo

win

gth

ispe

rcep

tion

ofsc

ienc

eto

prev

ail,

scie

ntis

tsha

veun

witt

ingl

yen

cour

aged

the

publ

icto

belie

vein

the

cert

aint

yof

scie

nce.

Art

eral

l,sc

ienc

e,de

als

with

defin

itive

law

sth

atar

ete

sted

.pro

ven,

and

repe

atab

le.A

sa

cons

eque

nce.

the

gene

ralp

ublic

.whi

chis

sam

pled

toro

rmth

eju

rypo

ol,i

sun

accu

stom

edto

the

met

hods

rout

inel

yus

edby

appl

ied

scie

ntis

tsto

deal

with

unce

rtai

nty.

For

hydr

olog

ists

,the

mos

tunc

erta

inas

pect

sof

mod

elco

nstr

ucti

on-

the

ones

that

nfte

nm

ake

anex

pert

witn

ess

squi

rmon

cros

s--e

xam

inat

ion

-ar

esp

arse

and

nois

yda

ta.

Usi

nga

shal

low

,tr

ansi

ent

cont

amin

ant

tran

spor

tm

odel

asan

exam

ple,

the

rollo

win

gty

pes

ofsp

arse

and

nois

yd

ata

com

mon

lyco

nfro

ntth

eex

pert

witn

ess

(Pri

cket

tand

Pet

tyjo

hn19

95).

•su

rfac

e-w

ater

/gro

undw

ater

inte

ract

ion

•he

tero

gene

ity,a

niso

trop

yan

das

sign

edhy

drau

licco

nduc

tivity

dist

ribu

tions

•sp

atia

land

tem

pora

lvar

iatio

nsin

rech

arge

rate

shi

stor

icpu

mpi

ngra

tes

and

sche

dule

sof

wel

ls

Mod

els

inth

eC

ourt

room

6162

Mod

elV

alid

atio

n

non-

syno

ptic

wat

er-le

vela

ndco

ntam

inan

tco

ncen

trat

ion

mea

sure

men

ts•

cont

amin

ants

ourc

ehi

stor

yan

dco

ntam

inan

tre

leas

era

tes

5.4

EX

PE

RT

WIT

NE

SS

ING

Exp

ert

witn

esse

s,un

like

lay

witn

esse

s,ca

npr

esen

top

mlO

ns.

An

expe

rtw

itnes

spo

sses

ses

know

ledg

eth

roug

hex

peri

ence

,tr

aini

ngor

educ

atio

nof

apa

rtic

ular

subj

ect

ingr

eate

rde

pth

than

the

gene

ral

publ

ic(M

atso

n19

94).

As

soci

ety'

sre

lian

ceon

spec

iali

sed

know

ledg

eha

sex

pand

ed,s

oto

oha

sth

eus

eof

expe

rtw

itnes

ses

(Wei

nste

in19

86).1

nre

cent

year

s,se

vera

lart

icle

san

dbo

oks

have

been

wri

tten

abou

tth

epr

olife

ratio

nof

junk

scie

nce

inth

eco

urtr

oom

.In

thes

ees

says

,exp

ert

wit

ness

esar

eco

mm

only

depi

cted

aspr

osti

tute

s,w

ho,f

orth

eri

ght

fee,

will

test

ify

toan

yfa

rfet

ched

theo

ryin

anat

tem

ptto

win

sym

path

yan

da

huge

awar

dfr

oma

scie

ntifi

cally

chal

leng

edju

ryse

lect

edfr

oma

tech

no-t

erri

fied

soci

ety

(Hub

er19

90;

Jost

1991

).P

eter

Hub

er,

auth

orof

Gal

ileo

'sR

even

ge:J

unk

Scie

nce

inth

eC

ourt

room

(199

1),a

rgue

sth

atth

ead

mis

sion

ofju

nksc

ienc

eis

inre

spon

seto

the

easi

ngof

stan

dard

sfo

rad

mis

sibi

lity

ofex

pert

test

imon

y.It

isa

prob

lem

that

may

befu

rthe

rhe

ight

ened

byju

dges

and

law

yers

who

are

not

adeq

uate

lytr

aine

dto

asse

ssth

eve

raci

tyof

the

scie

nti.f

icev

iden

cepl

aced

befo

reth

em(B

lauv

elt

1999

)..

For

muc

hof

the

20th

cent

ury,

cour

tsm

aint

aine

dth

atif

the

scie

ntifi

cth

eory

orre

ason

ing

was

suff

icie

ntly

relia

9le

toat

tain

the

gene

ral

acce

ptan

ceof

the

scie

ntifi

cco

mm

unity

,th

enth

eev

iden

cew

assu

ffic

ient

lyre

liabl

eto

bead

mitt

edin

cour

t.K

now

nas

the

Frye

Rul

e,th

isge

nera

lac

cept

ance

test

was

esta

blis

hed

in19

23(F

rye

v.U

nite

dSt

ates

)an

dgo

vern

edth

ead

mis

sibi

lity

ofsc

ient

ific

evid

ence

inU

Sco

urts

for

deca

des.

The

mai

ncr

itici

smof

the

Frye

Rul

ew

asth

atit

excl

uded

new

scie

ntifi

cad

vanc

esth

atw

ere

too

new

toha

vees

tabl

ishe

dge

nera

lacc

epta

nce

byth

esc

ient

ific

com

mun

ity

(Fos

ter

etal

.19

93).

Inth

ela

tter

part

ofth

e20

thce

ntur

y,m

any

stat

esad

opte

dth

eFe

dera

lRul

eso

fEvi

denc

e,w

hich

incl

uded

abr

oadl

ydi

scre

tiona

ryse

tofg

uide

lines

for

the

acce

ptan

cean

dre

stri

ctio

nof

scie

ntifi

cte

stim

ony.

Rul

e70

2,th

em

ost

impo

rtan

tof

thes

eru

les,

prov

ides

that

expe

rtte

stim

ony

isad

mis

sibl

e'if

scie

ntifi

c,te

chni

cal,

orot

her

spec

ialis

edkn

owle

dge

will

assi

stth

etr

ier

offa

ctto

unde

rsta

ndth

eev

iden

ceor

tode

term

ine

afa

ctin

issu

e'(W

eins

tein

1986

).A

ltho

ugh

the

'ass

ista

nce

toth

etr

iero

ffac

t'st

anda

rdli

bera

lise

dth

ead

mis

sibi

l­ity

ofsc

ient

ific

evid

ence

,itl

edto

the

adm

issi

onof

vari

ous

type

sof

nove

lexp

ertt

estim

ony

and

abl

urri

ngof

the

dist

inct

ion

betw

een

expe

rtte

stim

ony

and

lay

test

imon

y(W

eins

tein

1986

).T

heU

SSu

prem

eC

ourt

inD

aube

rtv.

Mer

rel

Dow

Pha

rmac

euti

cals

,In

c.,

a19

93ca

seal

legi

ngbi

rth

defe

cts

asa

resu

ltof

taki

ngth

ean

ti-n

ause

adr

ugB

ende

ctin

,he

ldth

atun

der

Rul

e70

2sc

ient

ific

know

ledg

epr

esen

ted

aste

stim

ony

mus

tbe

deri

ved

byth

esc

ient

ific

met

hod.

The

Supr

eme

Cou

rtal

sohe

ldth

atev

iden

tiary

relia

bilit

yis

tobe

base

don

scie

ntifi

cva

lidity

.Und

er

scie

ntis

tsan

den

gine

ers

accu

stom

edto

usin

gm

oder

nnu

mer

ical

and

com

puta

tiona

ltec

hniq

ues.

a51

%cr

iteri

onm

ayse

emlo

w.I

tm

ayse

emso

low

that

itaf

ford

sso

me

crea

tivity

for

expe

rts

tous

ean

alys

iste

chni

ques

that

prod

uce

resu

ltsm

ore

favo

urab

leto

thei

rcl

ient

'sca

se.T

his

appr

oach

isno

tun

ethi

cal.

Itm

aybe

empl

oyed

for

ava

riet

yof

reas

ons

-sc

ient

ists

may

appr

oach

prob

lem

sdi

ffer

entl

y,pa

rtie

sof

ten

cann

otaf

ford

the

mos

trig

orou

ssc

ient

ific

appr

oach

,leg

alst

rate

gies

may

not

call

for

aco

mpl

exan

alys

is.A

nov

erly

sim

plis

ticap

proa

chca

nle

adto

asm

uch

criti

cism

oncr

oss-

exam

inat

ion

conc

erni

ngin

appr

opri

ate

use

ofis

otro

pic

and

hom

ogen

eous

para

met

erva

lues

asca

nus

eof

inap

prop

riat

era

nges

ofhe

tero

gene

ous

para

met

erva

lues

ina

com

plex

anal

ysis

.Sim

plify

ing

assu

mpt

ions

are

alw

ays

good

fodd

erfo

rcr

oss-

exam

inat

ion.

Itis

upto

the

expe

rt,

inco

nsul

tatio

nw

ithhi

sfhe

rla

wye

r,to

deci

dew

heth

era

sim

ple,

one-

dim

ensi

onal

anal

ytic

alm

odel

issu

ffic

ient

lyre

pres

enta

tive

ofth

eflo

wsy

stem

,or

whe

ther

aco

mpl

ex,t

hree

­di

men

sion

alnu

mer

ical

mod

elis

requ

ired

,or

whe

ther

ala

bora

tory

dem

onst

ratio

nus

ing

asa

ndta

nkis

appr

opri

ate.

Itis

diff

icul

tto

pred

ictw

heth

er,i

nth

em

inds

ofth

eju

rors

,asi

mpl

eel

egan

tbu

tfu

ndam

enta

llyfla

wed

cons

truc

tion

will

bem

ore

orle

ssbe

lieva

ble

than

aco

mpl

exar

cane

trut

h.

100"

"'

Evi

denc

ein

civi

ltria

l

Valid

....id

ence

need

ed10

find

defe

ndan

tlia

ble

Pro

babi

lity

of

tru

ehy

poth

esis

1.00

unat

tain

able

Acc

eptib

ility

of

mod

elre

sults

Fig

ure

5.2

Com

pari

son

ofst

anda

rds

betw

een

aci

vil

tria

l,th

epr

obab

ility

ofa

corr

ect

hypo

thes

is,a

nd

the

acce

ptab

ilit

yof

resu

lts

from

ahy

drol

ogic

mod

el

Inm

ost

case

sin

volv

ing

site

-spe

cific

appl

icat

ion

ofhy

drol

ogic

mod

els,

man

yfa

ctor

sar

esi

mpl

yun

know

nan

dhe

nce

unce

rtai

n.B

ecau

seof

unce

rtai

ntie

s,m

ost

hydr

olog

ists

,if

pres

sed,

mig

htad

mit

toac

cept

ing

mod

elre

sults

that

are,

ina

loos

ely

quan

titat

ive

sens

e,75

to90

%ac

cura

te(s

eeF

igur

e5.

2).T

his

assu

mes

that

am

odel

cann

otbe

cons

truc

ted

that

is10

0%ac

cura

te(B

rede

hoef

tan

dK

onik

ow19

93).

Giv

ena

prob

abil

ity

rang

efr

om0

to1.

0th

ata

hydr

olog

icm

odel

accu

rate

lyre

pres

ents

the

Bow

syst

eman

dac

cept

ing

that

nohy

poth

esis

or

mod

elca

nbe

100%

accu

rate

,the

na

rang

eof

0.75

to0.

90,o

r75

to90

%,f

ora

hydr

olog

icfie

ldpr

oble

mw

ould

dem

onst

rate

are

lati

vely

high

degr

eeof

corr

espo

nden

cebe

twee

nm

odel

resu

lts

and

mea

sure

dva

lues

.In

the

exam

ple

ofa

cont

amin

ant

tran

spor

tm

odel

,thi

sw

ould

bea

rela

tivel

yhi

ghde

gree

ofco

rres

pond

ence

betw

een

sim

ulat

edan

dm

easu

red

valu

esof

hydr

aulic

head

,st

ream

flow

chan

gean

dso

lute

conc

entr

atio

n.O

ver

the

past

seve

ral

deca

des,

hydr

olog

ists

have

com

eto

expe

cta

high

erde

gree

ofac

cura

cybe

caus

em

oder

nfin

ite-e

lem

ent

and

finite

-diff

eren

cete

ch­

niqu

esre

quir

efe

wer

sim

plify

ing

assu

mpt

ions

abou

tth

ehy

drog

eolo

gic

sett

ing

and

can

addr

ess

mor

edi

ffic

ult

boun

dary

cond

ition

sth

anth

ecl

osed

-for

mca

lcul

us-b

ased

anal

ytic

alte

chni

ques

deve

lope

din

the

mid

dle

ofth

epa

stce

ntur

y.In

aci

vil

tria

l,th

eju

ryba

ses

its

verd

ict

ona

prep

onde

ranc

eof

the

evid

ence

.F

or

the

jury

tofi

ndfo

rth

epl

aint

iff,

am

ajor

ity

ofth

eev

iden

cem

ust

indi

cate

that

the

defe

ndan

tis

liabl

e.T

o

Mod

els

Inth

eC

ourt

room

6364

Mod

elV

alid

atio

n

the

Dau

ber

tru

ling

,th

etr

ialj

udge

isas

sign

edth

ere

spon

sibi

lity

ofga

teke

eper

tom

ake

prel

imi­

nary

eval

uati

ono

fwhe

ther

the

reas

onin

gan

dm

etho

dolo

gyun

derl

ying

the

test

imon

yis

scie

ntif

i­ca

lly

vali

do

rre

liab

lean

dw

heth

erit

isap

plie

dpr

oper

lyto

the

fact

sat

issu

e(F

oste

ret

aI.

1993

;B

lauv

elt1

999)

. Th

ega

teke

eper

'sro

leis

no

tto

dete

rmin

ew

hich

expe

rtop

inio

nis

corr

ect.

Rat

her,

itis

tode

term

ine

whe

ther

each

expe

rtus

edva

lid

scie

ntif

icre

ason

ing

and

prin

cipl

esto

reac

hhi

sfhe

rco

nclu

sion

san

dto

scre

enou

tpro

fess

iona

lopi

nion

sba

sed

onco

njec

ture

and

spec

ulat

ion

(Bla

uvel

t19

99).

The

Sup

rem

eC

ourt

esta

blis

hed

that

the

init

ial

dete

rmin

atio

nre

gard

ing

the

adm

issi

bili

tyo

fan

expe

rt's

scie

ntif

icte

stim

ony

isto

beba

sed

on

(1)w

heth

erth

eex

pert

opin

ion

isfo

unde

don

reli

able

data

,(2

)w

beth

erth

eex

pert

opin

ion

issu

ppor

ted

byva

lid

scie

ntif

icre

ason

ing

and

met

hodo

logy

.an

d(3

)w

heth

erth

eex

pert

opin

ion

isba

sed

onin

form

atio

nre

leva

ntto

the

case

(Bla

uvel

t19

99).

5.5.

EX

AM

PLE

OF

AN

NE

AN

DE

RS

ON

ET

AL

.v.

W.R

.G

RA

CE

&C

OM

PA

NY

AN

DB

EA

TR

ICE

FO

OD

S,

INC

.

Th

e19

86W

ob

urn

Tox

icT

rial

,the

info

rmal

nam

ere

rerr

ing

toA

nn

eA

nder

son

etaJ

.v.

W.R

.G

race

&C

ompa

nyan

dB

eatr

ice

Foo

ds,

Inc.

,is

anex

celle

ntex

ampl

eto

dem

onst

rate

the

anal

ogy

betw

een

scie

ntif

ichy

poth

esis

test

ing

and

the

civi

ltr

ial

proc

ess

usin

ga

case

that

cent

res

onth

ein

terp

reta

tion

of

hydr

olog

icd

ata

and

the

pred

icti

ons

of

hydr

olog

icm

odel

s.In

this

law

suit

,w

hich

isth

efo

cus

of

the

awar

d-w

inni

ngbo

okA

Civ

ilA

ctio

n(H

arr

1995

)an

dth

e19

99T

ouch

ston

eP

ictu

res

mov

ieof

the

sam

ena

me,

eigh

tpl

aint

iffs

,w

holi

ved

inea

ster

nW

obur

n,M

assa

chus

etts

,fil

edsu

itag

ains

ttw

ola

rge

corp

orat

ions

that

oper

ated

alo

cal

man

ufac

turi

ngpl

ant,

the

Cry

ovac

Div

isio

no

fW.

R.G

race

&C

ompa

ny,a

nd

alo

calt

anne

ryow

ned

byB

eatr

ice

Foo

ds,I

nc.T

hepl

aint

iffs

'198

2le

galc

ompl

aint

alle

ged

that

impr

oper

hand

ling

and

disp

osal

of

five

indu

stri

alch

emic

als,

incl

udin

gtr

ichl

oroe

then

e(T

CE

),di

chlo

roet

hene

(DC

E)

and

tetr

a·ch

loro

ethe

ne(p

eE

)at

the

two

prop

erti

es,

ente

red

the

grou

ndw

ater

syst

em,

flow

edto

two

mun

icip

alw

ells

,an

dpr

olon

ged

inge

stio

nan

dex

posu

reto

the

toxi

cch

emic

als

caus

edle

ukae

·m

ias,

cent

raln

ervo

ussy

stem

diso

rder

s,an

dot

her

heal

thpr

oble

ms.

Th

etw

om

unic

ipal

wel

ls,

know

nas

wel

lsG

&H

,be

gan

oper

atin

gin

1964

and

1967

,re

spec

tive

ly.T

he

wel

lsar

e2-

feet

indi

amet

er,

88·f

eet

deep

,an

d60

0fe

etap

art.

Bot

hw

ells

have

100f

oot

scre

ens

and,

whe

nop

erat

ing,

pum

ped

atav

erag

era

tes

of

700

and

400

US

gall

ons

per

min

ute,

resp

ecti

vely

.Wel

lsG

&H

wer

eus

edto

geth

eron

ly23

%of

the

tim

ean

dpr

imar

ily

wer

eus

edon

lydu

ring

peri

ods

ofd

roug

htto

augm

entw

ater

prod

uced

bysi

xot

her

mun

icip

alw

ells

inan

othe

rp

art

of

tow

n.T

hew

ells

wer

ebu

ilt

onea

rthe

nm

ound

sw

ithi

nth

efl

oodp

lain

of

the

Abe

rjon

aR

iver

.A

tno

rmal

stag

e,th

eri

ver

flow

sw

ithi

n30

0fe

eto

fwel

lG

and

100

feet

ofw

ell

H(F

igur

e5.

3).A

tele

vate

dst

ages

,the

rive

rflo

ods

acro

ssa

wet

land

and

flow

sw

ithi

na

few

feet

oft

hem

unic

ipal

wel

ls.T

hew

ells

are

cons

truc

ted

inhi

ghly

perm

eabl

egl

acia

lou

twas

hde

posi

tsfi

lling

abu

ried

bedr

ock

vall

eyco

mpo

sed

offr

actu

red

gran

odio

rite

(Fig

ure

5.4)

.Wel

lsG

&H

wer

ecl

osed

inM

ay19

79,

byor

der

ofth

eC

omm

onw

ealt

ho

fM

assa

chus

etts

,af

ter

wat

ersa

mpl

esre

veal

edco

ncen

trat

ions

ofT

CE

and

PC

Eex

ceed

ing

publ

iche

alth

stan

dard

s.U

SE

PA

(198

5)co

nsid

ered

TC

Ean

dp

eE

tobe

prob

able

hum

anca

rcin

ogen

s.S

ampl

esta

ken

from

wel

lsG

&H

prio

rto

this

date

wer

en

ot

anal

ysed

for

vola

tile

orga

nic

com

poun

ds.

Bec

ause

ofth

eco

mpl

exna

ture

of

the

case

,the

judg

e,in

acco

rdan

cew

ith

fede

ral

proc

edur

es,

divi

ded

the

case

into

tbre

eph

ases

.E

ach

phas

eco

ntai

ned

atr

ial

that

focu

sed

ona

spec

ific

issu

e.T

he

reso

luti

ono

fea

chis

sue,

inse

quen

ce,w

ould

prog

ress

toth

ede

term

inat

ion

of

the

ulti

mat

eIs

sue

-w

heth

erpr

olon

ged

cons

umpt

ion

ofdi

lute

conc

entr

atio

nsof

TC

E,

DC

Ean

d/o

rP

CE

caus

edth

esp

ecif

icty

pes

ofl

euka

emia

cont

ract

edby

the

plai

ntif

fs.T

hefi

rst

oft

hese

tria

lsw

asto

dete

rmin

ew

hich

,ifa

ny,o

fthe

cont

amin

ants

ente

red

the

grou

ndw

ater

syst

emon

the

defe

ndan

ts'

prop

erti

esan

d,if

so,w

heth

erth

eco

ntam

inan

tsfl

owed

toth

em

unic

ipal

wel

lsw

ithi

nth

etim

eth

ew

ells

oper

ated

.Ife

ithe

rdef

enda

ntw

asfo

und

liab

lein

this

phas

e,th

enth

esu

bseq

uent

two

phas

esw

ould

proc

eed

tode

term

ine

whe

ther

the

cont

amin

ant(

s)re

achi

ngth

ew

ells

coul

dca

use

leu­

kaem

ias

and

the

othe

rhe

alth

effe

cts.

Intr

ifur

cati

ngth

etr

ial,

the

judg

epr

oduc

eda

seri

esof

sequ

enti

alsu

bord

inat

ehy

poth

eses

.Ift

heju

ryre

ject

edth

esu

bord

inat

ehy

poth

esis

for

apa

rtic

u­la

rdef

enda

nt,t

hela

wsu

iten

ded

atth

atph

ase.

Ifth

eju

ryac

cept

edth

esu

bord

inat

eby

poth

esis

for

apa

rtic

ular

defe

ndan

t,th

ela

wsu

itco

ntin

ued

toth

ene

xtph

ase.

Fro

ma

hydr

olog

ist's

pers

pect

ive,

the

uniq

ueas

pect

ofth

istr

ifur

cate

dca

seis

that

the

firs

tph

ase

focu

sed

enti

rely

onsu

rfac

e-w

ater

and

grou

ndw

ater

hydr

olog

y.F

rom

the

jury

'spe

rspe

c·tiv

e,th

eun

ique

aspe

ctof

the

firs

tph

ase

isth

atth

epl

aint

iffs

did

not

test

ify

and

alm

ost

all

the

test

imon

ypr

esen

ted

byla

yan

dex

pert

wit

ness

esde

alt

wit

hsc

ient

ific

issu

esre

late

dto

con­

tam

inan

tso

urce

area

san

dco

ncen

trat

ions

,ge

olog

icch

arac

teri

sati

on,

phys

ical

prop

erti

esof

sedi

men

tan

dro

ck,

indu

ced

stre

ambe

din

filt

rati

on,f

lood

freq

uenc

y,su

rfac

e-w

ater

and

grou

nd­

wat

erin

tera

ctio

n,ft

owpa

ths,

reta

rdat

ion

fact

ors,

orga

nic

chem

istr

y,an

dth

epr

edic

tion

ofco

ntam

inan

tarr

ival

times

atth

ew

ells

usin

ghy

drol

ogic

mod

els.

As

are

SUlt,

the

tria

lpro

vide

san

inte

rest

ing

view

ofth

ein

terf

ace

betw

een

scie

nce

and

the

law

.P

re-t

rial

disc

over

ybe

gan

inO

ctob

er19

82.

No

fiel

dda

ta,

incl

udin

ggr

ound

wat

erle

vels

or

mon

itor

ing

wel

lsam

ples

,wer

eco

llec

ted

prio

rto

clos

ure

oft

hetw

om

unic

ipal

wel

lsin

May

1979

.A

sa

resu

lt,d

urin

gdi

scov

ery

itw

asne

cess

ary

tode

sign

and

perf

orm

fiel

dte

sts

tore

prod

uce

the

conf

igur

atio

no

fth

ew

ater

tabl

ew

hen

the

wel

lsw

ere

peri

odic

ally

oper

atio

nalb

etw

een

1964

and

1979

,an

dto

dete

rmin

eth

ede

gree

tow

hich

the

wel

lsw

ere

hydr

auli

call

yco

nnec

ted

toth

eA

berj

ona

Riv

eran

dw

etla

nd.I

ndep

ende

ntof

the

tria

l,th

eU

SG

eolo

gica

lS

urve

yan

dU

SE

PA

cond

ucte

da

30-d

aypu

mpi

ngte

stus

ing

wel

lsG

&H

.The

test

bega

nin

Dec

embe

r19

85an

dw

asdo

nein

supp

orto

ffed

eral

Sup

erfu

ndcl

eanu

pac

tivi

ties

atkn

own

sour

ces

ofco

ntam

inat

ion

near

wel

lsG

&H

.D

urin

gth

ete

st,w

ells

G&

Hw

ere

pum

ped

atth

eir

aver

age

rate

s.T

hepl

aint

iffs

'an

dde

fend

ants

'exp

erts

wer

epr

ovid

edth

egr

ound

wat

erle

vel

and

stre

amfl

owm

easu

rem

ents

mad

edu

ring

the

30-d

ayte

st.

The

sed

ata

help

edth

emde

velo

pth

eir

prof

essi

onal

opin

ions

for

the

tria

lco

ncer

ning

the

role

ofin

duce

dst

rear

p.in

filt

rati

on,

flow

path

sfr

omth

ede

fend

ants

'pro

pert

ies

toth

ew

ells

,and

trav

elti

mes

ofc

onta

min

ants

toth

ew

ells

.Bas

edon

thes

ean

dot

her

data

,th

ehy

drol

ogic

expe

rts

deve

lope

dco

ncep

tual

mod

els

ofth

ehy

drog

eolo

gic

sett

ing

and

cons

truc

ted

mat

hem

atic

alm

odel

sof

the

flow

syst

emth

atbe

cam

eth

efo

unda

tion

of

thei

rop

inio

ns.

The

expe

rts'

opin

ions

repr

esen

tin

fere

nces

draw

nfr

omth

eex

peri

men

tal

data

.F

igur

e5.

3sh

ows

the

conf

igur

atio

no

fth

ew

ater

tabl

eaf

ter

pum

ping

wel

lsG

&H

for

30da

ys.

Wat

erle

vels

inth

e45

mon

itor

ing

wel

lsus

edto

cons

truc

tF

igur

e5.

3ha

dno

tqu

ite

atta

ined

stea

dyst

ate

atth

een

do

fthe

pum

ping

peri

od(M

yett

eet

a1.

1987

).A

fter

the

firs

tda

yof

pum

ping

,pe

riod

icst

ream

disc

harg

em

easu

rem

ents

mad

eat

Oly

mpi

aA

venu

e,no

rth

ofth

ew

ells

,an

dat

Sal

emS

tree

t,so

uth

(dow

nstr

eam

)oft

hew

ells

(see

Fig

ure

5.3)

,sho

wed

that

wat

erin

the

rive

ran

dw

etla

ndw

asbe

ing

indu

ced

toflo

wdo

wnw

ard

into

the

aqui

fer

tosu

pply

the

two

mun

icip

alw

ells

.B

yth

een

do

fth

e30

day

pum

ping

peri

od.

ther

ew

as56

5U

Sga

llon

spe

rm

inut

ele

ssst

ream

disc

harg

em

easu

red

atS

alem

Str

eet

than

Oly

mpi

aA

venu

e(M

yett

eet

a1.

1987

).

5.5.

1E

xpe

rts'

Op

inio

ns

onth

eH

ydro

log

icS

yste

ma

tWo

bu

rn

Dur

ing

the

78-d

aytr

ial,

the

jury

hear

dop

enin

gre

mar

ksby

ala

wye

rre

pres

enti

ngea

chof

the

thre

epa

rtie

s,di

rect

test

imon

yan

dcr

oss-

exam

inat

ion

from

lay

and

expe

rtw

itnes

ses,

and

clos

ing

argu

men

tsfr

omth

ela

wye

rs.

The

jury

also

visi

ted

the

wel

lsG

&H

area

.D

urin

gdi

rect

exam

inat

ion,

the

geol

ogic

expe

rts

hire

dby

each

part

yde

scri

bed

the

aqui

fer

inw

hich

wel

lsG

&H

are

com

plet

edas

ahe

tero

gene

ous

sequ

ence

oftr

ansm

issi

vegl

acia

lsed

imen

ts(s

eeF

igur

eS.

4).

Th

em

ain

poin

tso

fco

ntro

vers

yin

the

opin

ions

ofth

ehy

drol

ogic

expe

rts

conc

erne

d(1

)th

e

W.f

t.\!'

!C!

I'Iyp

!rty,

I."..

..

EXf\.A~TION

[!J

Pn

l~

F.-.d

:U'ed

bfld

roc:

ka

OrM

ilI

901'1

1hol

lit

lS

and

and

grw

elI

PU

Tlll

ng..

Den

iel

.....l

lllC

r.n

•e"

dr

tit

--

•~~

~~~:

lIcS

ated

secl

"'*ll

•S

inO

/tt~

_.

_.

Bed

rock

surf

att

GJF

ill

Wei

ll) I

Mod

elV

alid

atio

n

5.5.

2P

lain

tiffs

'Exp

ert

The

defe

ndan

ts'la

wye

rsde

pose

dth

epl

aint

iffs

'byd

rolo

gic

expe

rton

thre

ese

para

teoc

casi

ons

for

ato

talo

f16

.5ho

urs

(Gro

ssm

anan

dV

augh

n19

99).

His

dire

ctte

stim

ony

occu

rred

onda

ys39

,40

and

41of

tbe

tria

l,w

bicb

was

follo

wed

byse

ven

days

ofcr

oss-

exam

inat

ion

and

two

days

ofre

-dir

ecte

xam

inat

ion

and

re-c

ross

exam

inat

ion.

The

plai

ntif

fs'e

xper

tcon

stru

cted

ath

ree-

dim

ensi

onal

flow

and

tran

spor

tm

odel

synt

hesi

sing

data

from

wel

llo

gs,s

oil

bori

ngs

and

slug

test

sin

toa

hete

roge

neou

sge

olog

icfr

amew

ork.

The

num

eric

alm

odel

was

used

tode

velo

pa

'cos

mop

olit

anvi

ew'

ofth

eaq

uife

ran

dflo

wsy

stem

.H

owev

er,b

ecau

seth

em

odel

was

notc

alib

rate

din

ari

goro

usm

anne

raga

inst

mea

sure

dva

lues

ofhe

ad,s

trea

mfl

owch

ange

orso

lute

conc

entr

atio

ns,i

twas

neve

rin

trod

uced

into

evid

ence

attr

ial

and

was

used

sole

lyto

illu

stra

tehi

sop

inio

nsdr

awn

from

othe

ran

alys

es.

Acc

ordi

ngto

the

plai

ntif

fs'e

xper

t,tb

em

odel

did

sim

ulat

eth

eov

eral

lpa

tter

nsof

grou

ndw

ater

flow

mea

sure

ddu

ring

tbe

30-d

aypu

mpi

ngte

st(D

epos

itio

n#4

,13

Feb

ruar

y19

86,p

.13

0).T

hepl

aint

iffs

'exp

ert

Fig

ure

5.4

Ge

ne

raliz

ed

ge

olo

gic

cro

ss-s

ect

ion

fro

mth

eB

ea

tric

ep

rop

ert

y,th

rou

gh

we

llG

,to

the

W.R

.G

race

prop

erty

(att

erM

ethe

ny19

98)

degr

eeto

whi

chth

eA

berj

ona

Riv

eran

dw

etla

ndw

ere

hydr

auli

call

yco

nnec

ted

toth

eaq

uife

r,(2

)tb

eby

drau

lic

prop

erti

esof

inte

rbed

ded

peat

and

fine

sand

unde

rlyi

ngtb

eri

ver

and

wet

land

,ou

twas

bsa

ndan

dgr

avel

intb

ebu

ried

valle

y,an

dsi

ltycl

ayO

odge

men

t)til

lun

derl

ying

the

upla

nds

(see

Fig

ure

5.4)

,an

d(3

)th

eco

nfig

urat

ion

ofth

ew

ater

tabl

ebe

neat

bth

eri

ver

and

wet

land

whe

nw

ells

G&

Hw

ere

pum

ping

(see

Fig

ure

5.3)

.The

opin

ions

ofth

eth

ree

hydr

olog

icex

pert

sdi

ffer

edsu

bsta

ntia

lly

onpa

thli

nes

and

trav

eltim

esof

cont

amin

ants

toth

ew

ells

,th

eca

ptur

ezo

nes

oftb

ew

ells

,and

wbe

tber

indu

ced

infi

ltra

tion

ofsu

rfac

ew

ater

ente

red

the

aqui

fer

and

Uow

edto

tbe

wel

lsdu

ring

pum

ping

.Fol

low

ing

are

desc

ript

ions

oftb

ete

stim

ony

oft

be

tbre

ehy

drol

ogic

expe

rts

inth

eca

se.A

sum

mar

yof

thei

rop

inio

nsan

dth

eba

ses

ofth

eir

opin

ions

are

give

nin

Fig

ure

5.5.

eo66 eo ... ...UII .1".... E .'" ~ ..0

!.--65

Mod

els

Inth

eC

ourt

room

Fig

ure

5.3

Wat

er-t

able

map

ofth

eA

berj

ona

Riv

erva

lley

nea

rw

ells

G&

Hat

ter

30da

ysof

cont

inuo

uspu

mpi

ng.3

Jan

uar

y19

86(c

onto

urs

from

Mye

tte

etal

.19

87).

WR

G;

W.R

.G

race

prop

erty

.B

F;

Bea

tric

eF

oods

prop

erty

.G

&H

;m

unic

ipal

wel

ls.T

;ta

nner

yw

ell

Mod

els

inth

eC

ourt

room

6768

Mod

elV

alid

alio

n

Fig

ure

5,5

Sum

mar

yof

hydr

olog

ists

'ex

per

top

inio

nsin

Ann

eA

nder

son

et

a/.

v.W

.R.

Gra

ce&

Co

mp

an

ya

nd

Bea

tric

eF

oods

,In

c

held

the

foll

owin

gop

inio

nsw

ith

resp

ect

toth

ein

tera

ctio

nof

the

wet

land

and

rive

rw

ith

the

grou

ndw

ater

Bow

syst

em.

Fie

ldda

ta

Bas

is

Geo

logi

cH

eter

ogen

eity

Riv

erin

filtra

tion

(wel

lspu

mpi

ng)

Pla

intif

fs'

Wa

ter

leve

ls,

wel

llo

gs,

focI

slug

test

s

Flow

vect

ors,

plus

1-0

anal

ytic

altr

ansp

ort

mod

el

Un

ifo

rmin

1-0

KGRA

C'=

75ft

lday

KsEATR~'

=23

00ft

lday

Lim

ited

infil

tra

tion

du

eto

peat

,re

ach

esw

ells

in10

to2

0ye

ars

Bea

trice

's

Wa

fer

leve

ls,

stre

am

flow

s,w

ell

logs

Pot

enti

omet

ric

map

san

dfl

owlin

es

Not

ad

dre

sse

ddi

rect

ly

Infil

trat

ion

ae

ale

sgr

ound

wat

erdM

de,

rea

che

sw

ells

in3

to4

mon

ths

w.R

.G

race

's

Wa

ter

leve

ls,

stre

am

flow

s,w

ell

log

s,fo

e.sl

ug

test

s,re

cha

rge

3-D

num

eric

alflo

wan

dtr

ansp

ort

mod

el

He

tero

ge

ne

ou

s3

laye

rsK

oNIG

,=0

.75

-1

13

ftld

ay

Sub

stan

tial

infi~ration

50

%o

fwe

lld

isch

arg

e•.

rea

che

sw

ells

in2

to4

mo

nth

s

...

inte

rms

ofB

eatr

ice,

Iw

ould

like

my

test

imon

yto

read

that

Te

Ew

as3

mon

ths,

[De

E]

-1.

03m

onth

s,[P

CE

]-

9.67

mon

ths..

.(T

rial

Day

41,

p.10

9)

Inth

isan

alys

is,

Ihe

plai

ntif

fs'e

xper

tus

eda

poro

sity

of0.

20,a

disp

ersi

vity

of67

.5fe

et,

and

diff

eren

tre

tard

atio

nfa

ctor

sfo

rea

chco

ntam

inan

tth

atra

nged

betw

een

1.5

and

8.F

or

the

calc

ulat

ions

pert

aini

ngto

cont

amin

ants

atW

.R.

Gra

ce,h

eus

eda

hydr

auli

cco

nduc

tivi

tyof

75fe

et/d

ay,a

hydr

auli

cgr

adie

ntof

0.00

1ao

da

dist

ance

of28

40fe

et,

whe

reas

heus

eda

hydr

auli

cco

nduc

tivi

tyof

2300

feet

/day

,a

hydr

auli

cgr

adie

ntof

O.o

I8an

da

dist

ance

of52

5fe

etfo

rth

eB

eatr

ice

calc

ulat

ions

(Tri

alD

ay41

,p.

109)

.In

his

opin

ion

the

chem

ical

sor

igin

atio

gat

Bea

tric

ere

ache

dw

ells

G&

Hw

ithi

na

few

mon

ths,

and

TC

Ean

dD

CE

orig

inat

iog

atW

.R.G

race

wer

epr

esen

tat

the

futu

relo

cati

ons

ofw

ells

G&

Hbe

fore

the

wel

lsw

ere

actu

ally

buil

t,as

sum

ing

the

chem

ical

sen

tere

dth

eD

owsy

stem

in19

60,t

heye

arth

epl

anto

pene

d.T

heA

berj

ona

Riv

er,i

nhi

svi

ew,

was

neit

her

aso

urce

ofad

diti

onal

cont

amin

atio

nto

the

wel

lsno

ra

sour

ceof

dilu

tion

beca

use

ofth

epo

orhy

drau

lic

conn

ecti

onbe

twee

nth

eri

ver

and

the

aqui

fer.

5.5.

3B

ea

tric

e's

Exp

ert

The

othe

rpa

rtie

sne

ver

depo

sed

the

expe

rthy

drol

ogis

thi

red

byB

eatr

ice.

His

enti

rete

stim

ony

occu

rred

duri

ngda

ys58

, 59

and

60of

the

tria

l.H

isop

inio

nsw

ere

base

don

his

conc

eptu

alis

atio

nof

the

hydr

ogeo

logi

cse

ttin

gus

ing

wel

llo

gs,

and

grou

ndw

ater

leve

lan

dst

ream

Dow

gain

flos

sm

easu

rem

ents

mad

edu

ring

the

30-d

aypu

mpi

ngte

st.

He

pres

ente

da

conc

eptu

alm

odel

ofth

eB

owsy

stem

,bu

tdi

dno

tco

nstr

uct

anan

alyt

ical

or

num

eric

alB

owm

odel

,or

com

pute

trav

eltim

es.

Wit

hre

spec

tto

the

inte

ract

ion

betw

een

the

Abe

rjon

aR

iver

and

the

pum

ping

wel

ls,

hem

ade

thes

est

atem

ents

duri

ngth

etr

ial.

...i

f1w

tre

totr

yan

dbr

acke

tthe

time

oftr

avel

ofco

ntam

inan

tsCr

omth

eriv

erto

the

wel

ls,i

tcou

ldbe

aslo

ngas

10to

20ye

ars.

(Tria

lD

ay43

,p.

67)

Ithi

nkve

ryli

ttle

[wat

er],

ifan

yat

allw

aspu

mpe

do

uto

fthe

rive

rdur

ing

the

pum

ping

tcst

orw

ells

Gan

dH

].(T

rial

Day

43,p

.71)

Th

ene

glig

ible

amou

ntof

indu

ced

infi

ltra

tioo

,he

stat

ed,

was

due

toth

eve

rylo

why

drau

lic

cond

ucti

vity

ofth

epe

atun

derl

ying

the

rive

ran

dw

etla

nd.

As

the

basi

sof

his

opin

ion,

the

plai

ntif

fs'e

xper

tus

eda

one-

dim

ensi

onal

anal

ytic

alflo

wan

dtr

ansp

ort

equa

tion

(Oga

ta-B

anks

equa

tion

,se

eD

omen

ico

and

Sch

war

tz19

98,

p.37

3)10

esti

mat

etr

avel

tim

esof

cont

amin

ants

from

the

W.R

.G

race

and

Bea

tric

epr

oper

ties

toth

em

unic

ipal

wel

ls.

Thi

son

e-di

men

sion

alan

alyt

ical

mod

elne

cess

itat

edus

eof

unif

orm

valu

esof

hydr

auli

cco

nduc

tivi

ty,h

ydra

ulic

grad

ient

and

poro

sity

,and

lim

ited

hydr

odyn

amic

disp

ersi

onto

the

long

itud

inal

dire

ctio

nof

grou

ndw

ater

Dow

.B

ased

onth

ison

e-di

men

sion

alan

alys

is,

the

plai

ntif

fs'e

xper

tmad

eth

efo

llow

ing

test

imon

yre

gard

ing

cont

amin

ant

trav

eltim

es.

...

atr

avel

tim

efo

rT

CE

of

3ye

ars

from

Gra

ce..

.th

etr

avel

tim

ein

term

so

fth

eG

race

site

toth

ew

ellf

ield

wou

ldbe

for

[DeE

]-

1.03

year~

[PC

E]-

9.67

yean

...

(Tria

lD

ay41

,pp

.108

-109

)

Iw

ould

say

that

rive

rw

ater

coul

dfl

owto

Wel

lsG

and

Hin

ape

riod

of3

to4

mo

nth

s.(T

rial

Day

58,

p.12

7)

...

the

rive

rcr

eate

sth

isri

dgep

ole

effe

ct,a

ndit

isth

ehi

ghpo

int

on

the

wat

erta

ble

surf

ace

wit

hth

eta

rpau

lin

that

slop

esaw

ayon

bo

thsi

des.

Thi

sis

caus

edby

the

pum

page

of0

actu

ally

indu

cing

wat

erto

leav

eth

eri

ver.

As

the

wat

ergo

eso

uto

rthe

rive

rcha

nnel

,itf

orm

sa

mou

ndo

nth

ew

ater

tabl

e,an

dth

em

ou

nd

isth

isri

dge-

shap

edaf

fair

...

(Tria

lD

ay59

,pp.

22-2

3)

...t

heco

neo

fdep

ress

ion

from

Gan

dH

,whi

chis

wha

twe'

vede

pict

edon

this

map

,can

only

gou

pto

the

rive

r.It

does

notc

ross

the

rive

r.S

oth

eef

fect

of[

weJ

ls]

Gan

dH

wiU

notc

ross

the

rive

rbu

twill

beco

ntai

ned

and

best

oppe

dfr

omle

akag

eby

the

rive

rits

elf.

(Tria

lD

ay59

,pp.

31-3

2)

The

Bea

tric

eex

pert

mad

eno

calc

ulat

ions

ofco

ntam

inan

ttra

vel

times

tow

ells

G&

Hbe

caus

ehi

san

alys

issh

owed

that

grou

ndw

ater

unde

rth

eB

eatr

ice

prop

erty

wou

ldno

tD

owun

der

the

rive

rto

the

east

and

dow

nwar

dto

the

wen

scre

ens.

He

mad

eth

efo

llow

ing

stat

emen

t.

Wha

tw

efo

und

ou

tw

asth

atgr

ound

wat

er[a

tB

eatr

ice]

,on

the

cont

rary

,mov

esaw

ayfr

omW

ells

Gan

dH

whe

nth

eyw

ere

pum

ping

.The

refo

re,t

hefa

ctof

havi

ngch

emic

als

inth

atw

ater

duri

ngth

e19

64to

1979

peri

odm

ayre

ally

bese

cond

ary

beca

use

even

ifth

eyw

ere

ther

e-an

dI'

mno

tsay

ing

they

wer

e-

bu

teve

nif

they

wer

e,tb

eyw

ould

no

tmov

eto

Wel

lsG

and

H.

(Tria

lDay

59,p

.57)

Mo

de

lsIn

the

Co

urt

roo

m69

70M

odel

Val

idat

ion

Inhi

sop

inio

n,co

ntam

inan

ts,

ifpr

esen

ton

the

Bea

tric

epr

oper

ty.w

ould

not

flow

east

war

dto

war

dm

unic

ipal

wel

lsG

&H

,bu

tw

ould

flow

wes

twar

d,aw

ayfr

omth

ew

ells

due

toth

egr

ound

wat

erm

ound

form

edbe

neat

hth

eA

berj

ona

Riv

erby

indu

ced

infi

ltra

tion

ofri

ver

wat

er.

Hen

ce,

cont

amin

atio

nm

easu

red

inw

ells

G&

Hin

May

1979

coul

dno

tbe

deri

ved

from

55-g

allo

ndr

ums

dum

ped

onth

eB

eatr

ice

prop

erty

beca

use

indu

ced

infi

ltra

tion

from

the

Abe

rjon

aR

iver

form

eda

barr

ier

togr

ound

wat

erflo

wfr

omth

atdi

rect

ion.

..fo

rT

CE

the

thre

epe

riod

sof

tim

eth

atI

calc

ulat

edw

ere

11ye

ars.

19ye

ars,

and

2Sye

ars..

.A

tthe

end

of

11ye

ars,

TC

Ew

ould

have

mov

eda

dist

ance

of75

Ofe

et.

Fo

r19

year

s,th

edi

stan

cew

ould

bele

ssth

an10

00fe

et.

And

for

2Sye

ars,

the

dist

ance

isle

ssth

an11

00fe

et.

(Tri

alD

ay68

,pp.

2-3)

The

dist

ance

(1,2

)tr

ans

(DeE

)w

ould

have

mov

edin

11ye

ars

isle

ssth

an80

0fe

et;

in19

year

s,le

ssth

an13

00fe

et;

and

in2S

year

s,le

ssth

an16

00fe

et.

[[ri

alD

ay68

,pp.

2-3)

#1.

Hav

eth

epl

aint

iffs

esta

blis

hed

bya

prep

onde

ranc

eo

fth

eev

iden

cetb

atan

yo

fth

efo

llow

ing

chem

ical

sw

ere

disp

osed

atth

eG

race

site

afte

rO

ctob

erI,

1964

and

subs

tant

iall

yco

ntri

bute

dto

the

cont

amin

atio

no

fWel

lsG

&H

byth

ese

chem

ical

spr

ior

toM

ay22

,19

79?

Bas

edo

nth

ese

mod

elsi

mul

atio

ns,h

isop

inio

nre

gard

ing

the

mov

emen

tof

orga

nic

solv

ents

atth

eW

.R.G

race

prop

erty

,whi

chw

ere

dum

ped

onth

ela

ndsu

rfac

ean

dpl

aced

in55

-gal

lon

drum

sin

ash

allo

wpi

t.w

asth

atev

enif

the

TC

E,

DC

Ean

dp

eE

wer

ere

leas

edin

toth

egr

ound

wat

erflo

wsy

stem

onth

eda

yth

epl

anto

pene

din

1960

,the

chem

ical

sw

ould

noth

ave

reac

hed

wel

lsG

&H

,ove

r25

00fe

etaw

ay,b

yM

ay19

79w

hen

the

wel

lsw

ere

shut

dow

n(T

rial

Day

68,p

p.2-

3).

5.5.

5Ju

ryV

erd

ict

At

the

end

ofth

etr

ial,

the

judg

ede

scri

bed

toth

eju

ryth

ele

gal

stat

utes

that

appl

ied

toth

eca

sean

dre

adtw

ose

tsof

spec

iali

nter

roga

tory

ques

tion

s,on

ese

toff

our

ques

tion

spe

rtai

ning

toea

chde

fend

ant.

whi

chw

ould

eluc

idat

eth

eir

verd

ict.

The

judg

ein

conc

ertw

ith

the

law

yers

com

pose

dth

esp

ecia

lin

terr

ogat

ory

ques

tion

s.O

bvio

usly

,th

eju

dge

belie

ved

the

jury

coul

dan

swer

the

ques

tion

sba

sed

upon

the

test

imon

ypr

esen

ted

atth

etr

ial.

The

firs

tsp

ecia

lin

terr

ogat

ory

ques

tion

.sh

own

belo

wfo

rW

.R.

Gra

ce,

aske

dth

eju

rors

tode

term

ine

whi

ch.

ifan

y,of

the

cont

amin

ants

subs

tant

iall

yco

ntri

bute

dto

the

cont

amin

atio

nof

wel

lsG

&H

duri

ngth

epe

riod

ofti

me

the

wel

lsop

erat

ed.

5.5.

4W

.R.

Gra

ceE

xpe

rt's

Te

stim

on

y

The

plai

ntif

fs'

atto

rney

depo

sed

the

expe

rthi

red

byW

.R.

Gra

cefo

r1.

5ho

urs.

His

dire

ctex

amin

atio

noc

curr

edo

nda

ys66

,67,

and

68of

the

tria

l,an

dw

asfo

llow

edby

cros

s-ex

amin

atio

no

nda

ys68

,69

and

70,a

ndre

-dir

ect

exam

inat

ion

onda

y71

.The

W.R

.G

race

expe

rtus

edw

ell

logs

.sei

smic

surv

eys,

and

soil

bori

ngs

from

the

area

toco

nstr

ucta

conc

eptu

alfr

amew

ork

ofth

ege

olog

icse

ttin

g.H

eus

edhi

stor

icpu

mpi

ngre

cord

s,hi

stor

icst

ream

flow

data

,an

dw

ater

-lev

elan

dst

ream

flow

mea

sure

men

tsfr

omth

e30

day

pum

ping

test

tode

velo

pa

conc

eptu

alm

odel

ofth

ehy

drol

ogic

syst

eman

dth

ein

tera

ctio

nbe

twee

nth

eri

ver

and

wet

land

wit

hth

egr

ound

wat

erflo

wsy

stem

.The

data

wer

ein

corp

orat

edin

toa

thre

e-di

men

sion

alnu

mer

ical

flow

and

tran

spor

tm

odel

that

was

used

tosi

mul

ate

tran

sien

tw

ater

leve

land

stre

amfl

owco

ndit

ions

,and

chem

ical

tran

spor

tin

the

flow

syst

emfr

om19

60to

1979

.The

mod

elin

corp

orat

edsp

atia

lva

riat

ions

inhy

drau

lic

cond

ucti

vity

,sp

atia

lan

dte

mpo

ral

vari

atio

nsin

rech

arge

.be

droc

kle

akag

e,pa

rtia

lpe

netr

atio

nof

the

wel

lsan

dri

ver,

and

hist

oric

pum

ping

rate

sof

the

mun

icip

alw

ells

.H

ydra

ulic

cond

ucti

vity

valu

esin

the

thre

e-la

yer

mod

elva

ried

from

0.75

feet

/day

for

the

lodg

emen

ttil

lun

derl

ying

the

bedr

ock

upla

nds

to11

3fe

et/d

ayfo

rth

egl

acia

lout

was

hfi

lling

the

buri

edva

lley.

The

Dow

mod

elw

asca

libr

ated

toda

taco

llec

ted

for

the

30da

ypu

mpi

ngte

stus

ing

wat

erle

vels

mea

sure

dim

med

iate

lybe

fore

wel

lsG

&H

com

men

ced

pum

ping

,tra

nsie

ntw

ater

leve

lsm

eas­

ured

duri

ngth

e30

day

pum

ping

peri

odan

dst

ream

flow

gain

and

loss

mea

sure

men

tsm

ade

befo

rean

ddu

ring

the

test

. The

tran

spor

tmod

elw

asno

tcal

ibra

ted

beca

use

ofth

ela

ckof

hist

oric

TC

E,

DC

Ean

dP

CE

data

.A

sens

itiv

ity

anal

ysis

was

perf

orm

edus

ing

rang

esof

tran

spor

tpa

ram

eter

san

da

cons

erva

tive

assu

mpt

ion

was

mad

epl

acin

gth

eco

ntam

inan

tsat

the

wat

erta

ble

the

day

the

plan

top

ened

in19

60.

Inhi

ste

stim

ony,

the

W.R

.G

race

expe

rtm

ade

the

foll

owin

gst

atem

ents

rega

rdin

gth

ein

tera

ctio

nbe

twee

nth

eri

ver/

wet

land

and

wel

lsG

&H

:

(a)

tric

hlor

oeth

ylen

e(b

)te

trac

hlor

oeth

ylen

e(c

)1,

2tr

ansd

ichl

oroe

thyl

ene

yes_

_ye

,__

ye,_

_

no_

_0

0_

_

no_

_

But

unde

rcon

diti

ons

whe

rea

man

-cau

scd

hydr

olog

icst

ress

.tha

tis

pum

ping

ofa

prod

ucti

onw

ell

for

wat

ersu

pply

.and

that

wel

lis

loca

ted

clos

eto

the

Abc

rjon

aR

iver

,it

will

indu

cew

ater

toflo

wo

ut

ofth

eri

ver

into

the

aqui

fer

and

bea

sour

ceof

the

supp

lyo

fwat

erto

thos

ew

ells

.(T

rial

Day

67,p

.73)

The

seco

ndin

terr

ogat

ory

ques

tion

.sh

own

belo

w.

aske

dth

eju

rors

tode

term

ine

the

year

and

mon

thw

hen

each

cont

amin

ants

elec

ted

in#1

firs

tre

ache

dth

ew

ells

.

#2.I

fyou

answ

ered

'Ycs

'in

ques

tion

1as

toan

ych

emic

al(s

),w

hat.

acco

rdin

gto

the

prep

onde

ranc

eof

the

evid

ence

,was

the

earl

iest

tim

eth

atsu

chch

emic

al(s

)dis

pose

dof

onth

eG

race

site

afte

rOct

ober

1,19

64m

ade

asu

bsta

ntia

lco

ntri

buti

onto

the

cont

amin

atio

no

fWel

lsG

&H

?

...o

na

long

·ter

mpe

riod

...•

the

wat

erth

atco

mes

ou

toft

heri

ver

gets

toth

ew

elts

wit

hin

two

mon

ths,

and

that

iseq

ual

toab

ou

tha

lfth

ew

ell

pum

page

.[[

rial

Day

67,p

.73)

(a)

tric

hlor

oeth

ylen

e(b

)te

trac

hlor

oeth

ylen

e(c

)1,

2tr

ansd

ichl

oroe

thyl

ene

mo)~

_m

o..

_mo'~

_

yr..

_yr

._

yr..

_

The

W.R

.Gra

ceex

pert

view

edth

eri

ver

asa

prob

able

sour

ceof

cont

amin

atio

nto

wel

lsG

&H

beca

use

ofab

unda

ntin

duce

din

filt

rati

onan

dpe

riod

icD

oodi

ngof

the

wet

land

brin

ging

vola

tile

orga

nic

com

poun

dsan

dhe

avy

met

als

from

know

nhi

stor

icso

urce

sof

cont

amin

atio

nup

stre

amin

the

basi

nin

toth

eca

ptur

ezo

nes

ofth

em

unic

ipal

wel

ls.

Wit

hre

spec

tto

sim

ulat

edtr

avel

times

ofco

ntam

inan

tsfr

omth

eW

.R.G

race

prop

erty

toth

ew

ells

.he

mad

eth

efo

llow

ing

stat

emen

ts

Acc

ordi

ngto

Pac

elle

(l9g

6),

the

jury

was

dum

bfou

nded

byth

esp

ecif

icity

ofth

esp

ecia

lin

ter­

roga

tory

ques

tion

s,es

peci

ally

havi

ngto

iden

tify

ada

te(y

eara

ndm

onth

)th

atea

chco

ntam

inan

tm

ade

asu

bsta

ntia

lco

ntri

buti

onto

the

cont

amin

atio

nof

the

wel

ls.

Pri

orto

rece

ivin

gin

stru

c­ti

ons

from

the

judg

e,th

eju

rors

belie

ved

they

wou

ldan

swer

asi

ngul

arqu

esti

onco

ncer

ning

the

sim

ple

liab

ilit

yof

each

defe

ndan

t,no

ta

seri

esof

com

plex

lyw

orde

dqu

esti

ons

abou

tea

chch

emic

alna

med

inth

ela

wsu

it(P

acel

le19

86).

The

thir

dan

dfo

urth

inte

rrog

ator

yqu

esti

ons

Mod

els

inth

eC

ourt

room

7172

Mod

elV

alid

atio

n

addr

esse

dth

ele

gal

issu

eof

negl

igen

cean

dw

ere

fram

edan

dw

orde

din

am

anne

rsi

mil

arto

the

firs

ttw

oin

terr

ogat

ory

ques

tion

s.A

fter

near

lyte

nda

ysof

som

etim

eshe

ated

deli

bera

tion

s(P

acel

le19

86),

the

jury

reac

hed

answ

ers

toth

esp

ecia

lin

terr

ogat

ory

ques

tion

s.W

.R.G

race

was

foun

dli

able

ofco

ntam

inat

ing

wel

lsG

&H

wit

hT

CE

begi

nnin

gin

Sep

tem

ber

1973

,hut

notw

ith

DC

Eo

rP

CE

.Bea

tric

eF

oods

was

foun

dno

tli

able

ofco

ntam

inat

ing

the

wel

lsw

ith

any

indu

stri

alch

emic

als.

The

answ

ers

toth

esp

ecia

lin

terr

ogat

ory

ques

tion

sse

rve

asth

eve

rdic

tan

dre

pres

ent

the

fina

lac

cept

ance

or

reje

ctio

nof

the

firs

tsu

bord

inat

ehy

poth

esis

.T

hetr

ial,

how

ever

,di

dno

tpr

ocee

dto

ase

cond

phas

ew

ith

the

rem

aini

ngde

fend

ant,

W.R

.G

race

&C

ompa

ny.

Sev

eral

mon

ths

late

r,a

sett

lce

men

tw

asre

ache

dbe

twee

nth

epl

aint

iffs

and

W.R

Gra

ce,

shor

tly

afte

rth

eju

dge

indi

cate

dhe

wou

ldgr

ant

the

defe

ndan

t'sm

otio

nfo

ra

mis

tria

lba

sed,

inpa

rt,

onin

cons

iste

ncie

sin

the

resp

onse

sto

tbe

spec

iali

nter

roga

tory

ques

tion

s(P

acel

le19

86).

5.5.

6D

iscu

ssio

n01

Wob

urn

Ve

rdic

t

Bas

edon

the

acco

unts

ofP

acel

le(1

986)

,K

enne

dy(1

989)

,an

dH

arr

(199

5),

itis

appa

rent

that

man

yof

the

part

icip

ants

and

obse

rver

sof

the

Wob

urn

Tox

icT

rial

felt

that

the

US

lega

lsys

tem

oper

ated

ata

leve

lbel

owits

best

.Aco

mm

oncr

itic

ism

ofth

eU

Sle

gals

yste

mis

itsre

lian

ceon

lay

juri

esin

exce

ptio

nall

yte

chni

cal c

ases

.Arg

umen

tsar

em

ade

that

high

lyte

chni

calc

ases

shou

ldbe

trie

dbe

fore

aju

dge

beca

use

judg

esar

em

ore

high

lyed

ucat

edan

dex

peri

ence

din

reso

lvin

gte

chni

cali

ssue

sth

ana

lay

jury

.Arg

umen

tsar

em

ade

that

tech

nica

lcas

essh

ould

betr

ied

befo

rean

expe

rtju

ry-

one

com

pris

edso

lely

ofex

pert

sw

hose

tech

nica

ldis

cipl

ines

are

germ

ane

toth

eca

se.

Alt

houg

hth

ese

argu

men

tsha

vem

erit

,so

doth

eco

unte

r-ar

gum

ents

.P

rent

ice

H.

Mar

shal

l,a

US

Dis

tric

tjud

ge,a

rgue

sth

at

...

inm

ost

civi

lan

dcr

imin

alca

ses

aca

refu

lly

sele

cted

jury

whi

chha

sre

cc:iv

edco

here

ntly

subm

itte

dev

iden

cean

dac

cura

tean

dsu

ccin

ctin

stru

ctio

nsis

supe

rior

toaj

ud

ge

inm

akin

gde

cisi

ons.

The

jury

'sco

llec

tive

com

preh

ensi

ono

fthe

fact

sis

mor

eco

mpl

ete

than

the

judg

e's.

The

jury

rend

ers

its

deci

sion

mor

equ

ickl

yth

anth

eju

dge

can.

The

jury

'sin

depe

nden

cean

din

tegr

ity

are

supe

rior

toth

eju

dge'

s.T

heju

ry's

cros

s-se

ctio

nal

mak

eup

brin

gsco

mm

unit

yva

lues

toth

ede

cisi

on·m

akin

gpr

oces

s.(M

arsh

all1

990)

Lyn

nN

.Hug

hes,

also

aU

SD

istr

ictj

udge

,arg

ues

that

itw

ould

bene

arly

impo

ssib

leto

empa

nel

aju

ryof

expe

rts,

who

indi

vidu

ally

did

not

deve

lop

bias

esas

are

sult

ofth

eir

prof

essi

onal

expe

rien

ces,

whe

reas

ala

yju

ry,

whi

lena

ive,

isun

bias

edan

dca

nus

uall

yun

ders

tand

the

pert

inen

ttec

hnic

alis

sues

(per

sona

lcom

mun

icat

ion,

Oct

ober

1999

).A

sa

soci

ety,

we

trus

tth

atth

eco

llec

tive

wis

dom

ofth

eju

ryw

illpr

oduc

eth

eco

rrec

tve

rdic

t(M

arsh

all

1990

).H

owev

er,t

hepr

oces

sby

whi

chth

eju

ryde

rive

sth

eve

rdic

tis

inhe

rent

lypa

ssiv

e(F

ried

land

1990

).Ju

rors

may

or

may

notb

eal

low

edto

mak

eno

tes

duri

ngth

etr

ial.

The

yca

nnot

read

supp

lem

enta

lm

ater

ials

or

refe

renc

ebo

oks.

The

ypr

obab

lyar

eno

tal

low

edto

revi

ewth

ete

stim

ony

tran

scri

bed

byth

eco

urtr

ecor

der.

The

yca

nnot

disc

uss

the

case

wit

hot

hers

,or

amon

gth

emse

lves

exce

ptdu

ring

form

alde

libe

rati

ons

foll

owin

gth

etr

ia!.

Stu

dent

sar

eac

tive

lear

ners

;ju

rors

are

not.

Juro

rs,

unli

kest

uden

ts,d

ono

tge

tto

bene

fit

from

hom

ewor

kas

sign

men

ts,t

erm

pape

rs,l

abor

ator

yre

port

s,an

dex

ams

that

rein

forc

eco

ncep

tsco

vere

din

clas

s.A

listo

fthe

hydr

olog

icto

pics

the

juro

rsin

the

Wob

urn

Tox

icT

rial

wer

eas

ked

toco

mpr

ehen

din

clud

esge

olog

icm

appi

ng,g

laci

alhi

stor

yan

dgl

acia

lstr

atig

raph

y,ph

ysic

alpr

oper

ties

ofro

cks

and

sedi

men

ts,d

raw

dow

nsan

dco

nes

ofde

pres

sion

prod

uced

bypu

mpi

ngw

ells

,str

eam

gaug~

ing,

floo

dre

curr

ence

inte

rval

s,in

duce

dst

ream

infi

ltra

tion

,aq

ueou

san

dor

gani

cch

emis

try,

regi

onal

grou

ndw

ater

flow

,con

tam

inan

ttra

nspo

rtw

ilh

reta

rdat

ion,

and

anal

ytic

alan

dnu

mer

i­ca

lmod

els

ofgr

ound

wat

erflo

wan

dtr

ansp

ort.

The

topi

csar

ene

arly

equi

vale

ntto

the

cont

ento

fco

urse

sa

grad

uate

stud

enti

sre

quir

edto

take

for

am

aste

r's

degr

eein

hydr

olog

y.O

nly

one

ofth

esi

xju

rors

inth

eW

obur

nT

oxic

Tri

alat

tend

edco

lleg

ean

dno

neha

dan

ysp

ecif

icsc

ient

ific

trai

ning

or

back

grou

nd(P

acel

le19

86).

The

crux

ofth

eju

ry's

deci

sion

sin

the

Wob

urn

Tox

icT

rial

cent

red

onth

eir

unde

rsta

ndin

gth

ehy

drog

eolo

gic

sett

ing

and

itsin

flue

nce

ongr

ound

wat

erpa

thli

nes

and

cont

amin

antt

rave

ltim

es,

the

inte

ract

ion

betw

een

the

grou

ndw

ater

flow

syst

eman

dth

ew

etla

ndw

hen

the

mun

icip

alw

ells

wer

epu

mpi

ngan

dw

hen

they

wer

eno

t,an

dth

epr

oces

ses

affe

ctin

gth

efa

tean

dtr

ansp

ort

ofch

lori

nate

dso

lven

ts.A

sa

soci

ety,

we

hope

the

jury

had

asu

ffic

ient

leve

lof

unde

rsta

ndin

gof

the

field

data

and

anap

prec

iati

onof

the

nece

ssar

yth

eory

and

conc

epts

todi

ffer

enti

ate

amon

gth

edi

verg

ent

opin

ions

held

byth

ehy

drol

ogic

expe

rts.

As

scie

ntis

ts,

we

hope

the

jury

was

able

todi

ffer

enti

ate

amon

gth

ete

chni

cal

appr

oach

esus

edby

the

hydr

olog

icex

pert

s.A

shy

drol

ogic

mod

elle

rs,

we

hope

the

jury

was

able

tode

ciph

erth

eli

mit

alio

nsof

each

expe

rt's

pred

icti

vem

odel

.W

eha

vehi

ghho

pes.

InJa

nuar

y19

99,H

arva

rdL

awS

choo

lhe

lda

conf

eren

ceca

lled

Les

sons

/rom

Wob

urn.

Man

yof

the

law

yers

,sev

eral

ofth

epl

aint

iffs

'mot

hers

,som

eof

the

expe

rtw

itnes

ses,

and

one

juro

rfro

mth

etr

ial

part

icip

ated

inth

eco

nfer

ence

.M

any

ofth

ese

peop

lele

dfo

cus

sess

ions

deal

ing

wit

hsp

ecif

icas

pect

sof

the

tria

l.(V

ideo

tape

sof

the

sess

ions

can

bevi

ewed

on

the

conf

eren

cew

ebsi

teat

ww

w.c

yber

.law

.har

vard

.edu

/aci

vila

ctio

n.)T

heju

ror

who

spok

em

enti

oned

'gro

win

gup

ona

cott

onan

dto

bacc

ofa

rmw

here

chem

ical

sw

ere

rout

inel

ysp

raye

don

the

crop

san

dth

athe

rfa

mily

used

asp

ray

bott

leof

DD

Tin

the

hous

eto

kill

flies

.T

oth

isju

ror,

expo

sure

toto

xic

chem

ical

sw

asa

com

mon

,no

n-de

lete

riou

soc

curr

ence

.T

he

juro

ral

som

enti

oned

that

wat

erfr

omth

eB

eatr

ice

prop

erty

coul

dno

t flo

wth

roug

hth

eA

berj

ona

Riv

erto

the

mun

icip

alw

ells

.To

me,

sitt

ing

inth

eau

dien

ce,i

tsou

nded

asif

the

juro

rco

nsid

ered

the

hydr

olog

icsy

stem

toco

nsis

tof

stre

ams

ofw

ater

that

cnul

dno

tpa

ssth

roug

hea

chol

her,

asd

obe

ams

oflig

ht.

The

juro

r's

com

men

tsug

gest

edth

atth

eju

rym

ayha

vese

enth

eflo

wsy

stem

inon

lytw

odi

men

sion

san

ddi

dno

tund

erst

and

the

impo

rtan

ceof

the

part

iall

ype

netr

atin

gw

ells

,ind

uced

infi

ltra

tion

ou

tof

the

rive

ran

dw

etla

nddo

wnw

ard

toth

ew

ells

,an

dth

eth

ree-

dim

ensi

onal

char

acte

rof

the

capt

ure

zone

sof

the

wel

ls.I

fthi

sis

true

,as

ate

ache

r,I

find

itte

rrib

lydi

sapp

oint

ing

-al

lth

ree

hydr

olog

icex

pert

s,es

peci

ally

the

plai

ntif

fs'a

ndW

.R.G

race

's,t

ook

seve

ralh

ours

inth

eird

irec

ttes

tim

ony

toed

ucat

eth

ejur

yon

the

loca

lgeo

logy

and

the

gene

ralc

once

pts

ofsu

rfac

e-w

ater

and

grou

ndw

ater

hydr

olog

y.H

ydro

logi

sts

inva

riab

lyar

edi

smay

edat

the

degr

eeof

scie

ntif

icce

rtai

nty

the

judg

ean

dth

ela

wye

rsex

pect

edof

the

jury

inor

der

toan

swer

the

cont

amin

anta

rriv

alti

me

ques

tion

sin

spec

ial

inte

rrog

ator

ies

#2an

d#4

wit

ha

prec

isio

nof

one

mon

th.H

owev

er,o

neof

the

hydr

olog

icex

pert

sst

ated

cont

amin

ant

trav

elti

mes

inte

rms

ofhu

ndre

dths

ofa

mon

th,

seem

ingl

yex

pres

sing

his

cert

aint

yin

the

arri

valt

ime

ofth

eco

ntam

inan

tsw

ithi

npl

usor

min

usei

ghth

ours

.Thi

sm

ayha

vebe

enth

epr

eced

ent

for

the

judg

ean

dth

ela

wye

rsto

requ

est

the

unre

alis

tic

degr

eeof

scie

ntif

icce

rtai

nty

stat

edin

spec

iali

nter

roga

tori

es#2

and

#4.A

spo

tent

iale

xper

twitn

esse

s.w

esh

ould

ask

ours

elve

sw

heth

erth

eun

real

isti

cde

gree

ofsc

ient

ific

cert

aint

yre

ques

ted

insp

ecia

lin

ter­

roga

tori

es#2

and

#4de

mon

stra

tes

age

nera

lla

ckof

scie

ntif

icun

ders

tand

ing

byth

eco

urts

,or

does

itde

mon

stra

teo

urd

isre

gard

for

ackn

owle

dgin

gto

the

gene

ralp

ubli

cth

eun

cert

aint

yof

our

wor

k?O

utsi

deth

eco

urtr

oom

,we

ackn

owle

dge

that

even

the

mos

tco

mpl

ete

mod

elan

alys

isof

anac

tual

field

prob

lem

bas

lim

itat

ions

and

cont

ains

unce

rtai

nty.

Insi

deth

eco

urtr

oom

,un

cer­

tain

tyis

usua

lly

reve

aled

oncr

oss-

-exa

min

atio

Din

atte

mpt

sby

the

oppo

sing

part

yto

coun

tera

ctan

dda

mag

ete

stim

ony

pres

ente

ddu

ring

dire

ctex

amin

atio

n.It

isin

tere

stin

gto

cont

rast

the

degr

eeof

scie

ntif

icso

phis

tica

tion

empl

oyed

byth

eth

ree

hydr

olog

icex

pert

sto

deve

lop

thei

rop

inio

nsco

mpa

red

wit

hth

eve

rdic

tre

nder

edby

the

jury

.

Mod

els

Inth

eC

ourt

room

7374

Mod

elV

alid

atio

n

Exp

ert

Op

inio

n

1.00

unat

tain

able

Fig

ure

5.6

Pro

bab

ility

ofco

nst

ruct

ing

are

alis

tic

mo

del

ofth

eh

ydro

log

icsy

stem

atW

obur

n.

Hav

ing

read

over

1800

page

sor

test

imon

ypr

esen

ted

byth

eth

ree

hydr

olog

icex

pert

san

dha

ving

help

edco

nstr

uct

thre

e-di

men

sion

alnu

mer

ical

flow

and

tran

spor

tm

odel

sor

the

wel

lsG

&H

area

(see

Met

heny

1998

),1

rank

the

degr

eeor

soph

isti

cati

onor

thei

rap

proa

ches

acco

rdin

gto

that

show

n.on

Fig

ure

5.6.

·T

he

plai

ntif

fs'e

xper

tan

alys

edw

ell

logs

from

the

valle

yan

dup

land

s,gr

ain-

size

anal

yses

and

slu

gte

sts

and

port

raye

dth

ege

olog

yas

ah

eter

ogen

eou

sas

sem

bla

geof

glac

ialm

ater

ials

.He

use

dth

isge

olog

icfr

amew

ork

toco

nstr

uct

anuD

calib

rate

dth

ree-

dim

ensi

onal

num

eric

alflo

wan

dtr

ansp

ort

mod

elus

edfo

rill

ustr

ativ

epu

rpos

es.T

heon

e-di

men

sion

alan

alyt

ical

equa

tion

heus

edto

com

pute

cont

amin

ant

trav

eltim

esin

adeq

uate

lyin

corp

orat

edth

ehe

tero

gene

ous.

natu

reof

the

glac

ialm

ater

ials

,con

verg

ing

thre

e-di

men

sion

alflo

wto

the

pum

ping

wel

ls,i

nduc

edin

filtr

a­tio

nfr

omth

eri

ver

and

wet

land

,le

akag

efr

ombe

droc

k,hy

drod

ynam

icdi

sper

sion

,spa

tial

and

tem

pora

lva

riat

ions

inre

char

ge,

and

tem

pora

lva

riat

ions

inpu

mpi

ngra

tes.

Bas

edon

thes

elim

itatio

ns,

Ibe

lieve

the

prob

abili

tyth

atth

isan

alys

isre

alis

tical

lyre

pres

ents

the

flow

syst

emw

hen

wel

lsG

&H

wer

ein

use

tobe

nom

ore

than

40%

(Fig

ure

5.6)

.T

he

Bea

tric

eex

pert

plot

ted

and

anal

ysed

the

wat

erle

vela

ndst

ream

flow

data

from

the

30-d

aypu

mpi

ngte

st.

He

cons

truc

ted

nom

odel

san

dm

ade

notr

avel

time

calc

ulat

ions

.Thi

san

alys

isin

adeq

uate

lyin

corp

orat

esth

eco

mpl

exit

yof

the

inte

ract

ion

betw

een

the

surf

ace-

wat

eran

dth

egr

ound

wat

erflo

wsy

stem

s.It

igno

res

the

thre

e-di

men

sion

alna

ture

ofth

egr

ound

wat

erflo

wsy

stem

crea

ted

byth

epa

rtia

lpe

netr

atio

nof

the

wel

lsan

dth

eri

ver.

By

rely

ing

sole

lyon

lim

ited

field

data

and

noti

ncor

pora

ting

hist

oric

dat

ain

toa

mod

elor

any

kind

,his

anal

ysis

inad

equa

tely

acco

unts

for

bedr

ock

leak

age,

aqui

fer

hete

roge

neity

,te

mpo

ral

and

spat

ial

vari

atio

nsin

re­

char

ge,a

ndte

mpo

ralv

aria

tions

inpu

mpi

ngra

tes.

Ibe

lieve

the

prob

abili

tyth

atth

isco

ncep

tual

anal

ysis

real

isti

call

yre

pres

ents

the

flow

syst

embe

twee

n19

64an

d19

79to

bele

ssth

an25

%(F

igur

e5.

6).

The

W.R

.Gra

ceex

pert

used

the

avai

labl

ege

olog

ic,h

ydro

logi

can

dpu

mpi

ngd

ata

toco

nstr

uct

Tes

tim

ony

rrom

the

Wob

urn

Tox

icT

rial

show

sth

atpr

edic

tion

srr

omhy

drol

ogic

mod

els

wer

ece

ntra

lto

the

expe

rtop

inio

nspr

esen

ted

toth

eju

ry,w

here

asm

odel

cali

brat

ion

was

nota

maj

oris

sue

brou

ght

bero

reth

eju

ry(a

ltbo

ugh

itw

asdi

scus

sed

heat

edly

inde

posi

tion

san

ddu

ring

the

tria

lat

seve

ral

side

bars

betw

een

the

law

yers

and

the

judg

e).N

ow,f

ifte

enye

ars

afte

rth

etr

ial,

1be

lieve

mod

elca

libra

tion

wou

ldbe

anim

port

ant

part

ofth

edi

rect

exam

inat

ion

and

thecross~

exam

inat

ion

ofea

chex

pert

hydr

olog

ist.

Tod

ay,

the

met

hods

ofm

odel

cali

brat

ion

are

muc

hbe

tter

esta

blis

hed

and

know

nby

the

hydr

olog

icco

mm

unit

yth

anth

eyw

ere

then

.T

extb

ooks

(And

erso

nan

dW

oess

ner

1992

)an

dst

anda

rds

(Bro

wn

and

Laa

se19

95)

have

been

wri

tten

and

tbei

rin

flue

nce

onm

odel

ling

stud

ies

ispe

rvas

ive.

Phi

loso

phic

,pra

gmat

ican

dgu

idan

cear

ticl

esal

soha

vebe

enw

ritt

enab

outm

odel

cali

brat

ion

(Bre

dehe

enan

dK

onik

ow19

93;M

cCom

bie

and

McK

inle

y19

93;B

air

1994

;Ore

skes

etal

.19

94;W

oess

nera

ndA

nder

son

1996

)an

dth

ees

sent

ial

proc

edur

esus

edin

hydr

olog

icm

odel

ling

have

beco

me

part

ofth

era

bric

orou

rdis

cipl

ine.

Inth

ein

teri

m,

expe

rtw

itnes

ses

have

pass

edth

iskn

owle

dge

onto

thei

rla

wye

rs,

who

appe

arto

unde

rsta

ndth

ete

rms

and

tbe

met

hods

.Thi

sw

asno

ttru

ein

1986

whe

nth

eW

obur

nT

oxic

Tri

alto

okpl

ace.

Tod

ay,m

odel

cali

brat

ion

wou

ldbe

acr

itic

alpa

rto

rth

esc

ient

ific

met

hods

appl

ied

toth

eco

nstr

ucti

onor

apr

edi<

;tive

mod

elus

edby

ahy

drol

ogic

expe

rtw

itnes

s.A

ssuc

h,th

em

etho

dsus

edto

cali

brat

etb

em

odel

wou

ldpr

obab

lybe

eval

uate

dby

the

tria

ljud

geun

der

the

Dau

bert

5.6

CO

NC

LU

SIO

NS

atr

ansi

entt

hree

-dim

ensi

onal

num

eric

alD

owan

dtr

ansp

ortm

odel

ofth

ear

eath

atac

coun

ted

for

the

hete

roge

neou

sch

arac

ter

ofth

egl

acia

lm

ater

ials

,pa

rtia

lpe

netr

atio

nof

the

pum

ping

wel

lsan

dth

eri

ver,

bedr

ock

leak

age,

spat

iala

ndte

mpo

ralv

aria

tions

inre

char

ge,h

isto

ric

vari

atio

nsin

pum

ping

rate

s,by

drod

ynam

icdi

sper

sion

,an

dch

emic

alre

tard

atio

n.It

was

the

mos

tco

mpr

e­he

nsiv

ean

alys

isan

dth

em

osts

ophi

stic

ated

mod

el.T

hefl

owm

odel

was

cali

brat

edus

ing

two

sets

ofm

easu

red

wat

erle

vela

ndst

ream

flow

gain

/loss

data

.The

tran

spor

tm

odel

was

notc

alib

rate

d,al

thou

gha

sens

itivi

tyan

alys

isw

aspe

rfor

med

tode

tenn

ine

poss

ible

rang

esof

cont

amin

ant

arri

val

tim

esat

wel

lsG

&H

.T

his

mod

elin

corp

orat

edm

any

mor

eor

the

hydr

olog

icra

ctor

saf

fect

ing

surf

ace-

wat

eran

dgr

ound

wat

erD

owov

erth

eIS

-yea

rpe

riod

wel

lsG

&H

oper

ated

.T

hem

odel

also

incl

uded

mor

epa

ram

eter

san

dpr

oces

ses

and

few

erun

real

istic

assu

mpt

ions

than

the

othe

rap

proa

ches

.1

belie

veth

epr

obab

ilit

yis

abo

ut

75%

that

this

anal

ysis

repr

esen

tsth

eac

tual

beha

viou

roft

heflo

wsy

stem

duri

ngth

epe

riod

whe

nw

ells

G&

Hw

ere

oper

atin

g(F

igur

e5.

6). The

maj

ordi

ffic

ultie

sea

chof

the

hydr

olog

icex

pert

sfa

ced

inco

nstr

uctin

ga

relia

ble

hy.

drol

ogic

mod

elth

atco

uld

pred

ict

wat

erle

vels

,st

ream

ftow

san

dco

ntam

inan

tco

ncen

trat

ions

wer

eth

ela

ckof

hist

oric

sour

ceco

ncen

trat

ion

valu

esof

the

cont

amin

ants

and

the

lack

ofhi

stor

icw

ater

leve

l,st

ream

flow

chan

ge,a

ndch

emic

alco

ncen

trat

ion

mea

sure

men

tsth

atco

uld

beus

edas

calib

ratio

nta

rget

s.T

hesa

me

diff

icul

ties

exis

tto

day

for

rese

arch

ers

tryi

ngto

furt

her

unde

rsta

ndth

ehy

drol

ogy

orth

esi

te(M

yett

eet

al.

1987

;de

Lim

aan

dO

lim

pio

1989

;Met

heny

1999

).E

ven

thou

gha

soph

isti

cate

dm

odel

may

cali

brat

ere

ason

ably

wel

lto

the

avai

labl

eda

ta,

ther

ear

esi

nlpl

yin

adeq

uate

hist

oric

data

toen

able

the

prob

abili

tyof

are

liabl

ean

alys

isto

bem

uch

bett

erth

an70

to80

%.I

tis

the

lack

orhi

stor

icd

ata

and

tbe

unce

rtai

nty

prod

uced

ther

eby

that

mak

esw

orki

ngin

the

lega

lare

naso

chal

leng

ing.

From

the

view

poin

tof

scie

ntifi

cso

phis

tica

tion

,the

jury

'sve

rdic

tis

the

inve

rse

ofth

era

nkin

gsh

own

onF

igur

e5.

6-

Bea

tric

ew

asro

und

not

liab

lean

dW

.R.

Gra

cew

asro

und

liabl

e.T

hena

ggin

gqu

esti

ons

ror

law

yers

and

hydr

olog

ists

stud

ying

the

Wob

urn

Tox

icT

rial

isw

heth

erth

esc

ienc

eits

elfw

asto

oco

mpl

icat

edfo

rth

eju

dge

and

jury

,and

/or

whe

ther

the

pres

enta

tion

ofth

esc

ienc

ew

asto

oco

nfus

ing.

}P

lain

tiffs

}B

eatr

ice

}w.

R.G

race

0.75

Mod

els

inth

eC

ourt

room

7576

Mod

elV

alid

atio

n

ruli

ngan

dm

odel

cali

brat

ion

wou

ldun

doub

tedl

ybe

high

lysc

ruti

nise

dun

derc

ross

-exa

min

atio

n.M

odel

sw

illal

way

sbe

attr

acti

veto

ols

forl

awye

rsan

dex

pert

sto

conv

eyin

form

atio

nto

ajur

y.C

onti

nued

adva

nces

inim

age

proc

essi

ngan

dvi

sual

izat

ion

will

brin

gdi

gita

lani

mat

ion

ofm

odel

sim

ulat

ions

into

the

cour

troo

mw

ith

incr

easi

ngfr

eque

ncy

(Sta

ffor

d19

98).

Mod

els

synt

hesi

zefi

eld

dat

aan

din

corp

orat

eph

ysic

al.

chem

ical

and

biol

ogic

alpr

oces

ses

ina

man

ner

that

ad­

dres

ses

the

caus

alre

lati

ons

that

mos

tle

gal

disp

utes

seek

tore

solv

e.M

odel

sca

nsi

mul

ate

the

unob

serv

edco

ndit

ions

that

occu

rred

atth

ecr

uxof

the

conf

lict

.Th

eab

ilit

yo

fhyd

rolo

gic

mod

els

tom

ake

reas

onab

lepr

edic

tion

so

ftb

ese

cond

itio

ns,b

owev

er,w

illal

way

sbe

depe

nden

ton

tbe

accu

racy

ofth

eco

ncep

tual

hydr

ogeo

logi

cfr

amew

ork

and

on

havi

ngsu

ffic

ient

hist

oric

dat

ato

assu

reth

eju

ryth

atth

em

odel

isa

real

isti

cre

pres

enta

tion

of

real

ity.

Wit

hout

hist

oric

data

,ri

goro

usca

libr

atio

no

ftb

em

odel

isno

tpo

ssib

lean

dth

eop

inio

nso

fexp

erts

are

vuln

erab

leto

alla

ckby

tbe

oppo

siti

on-

asw

ellt

bey

sbou

ldbe

.Tb

efo

llow

ing

stat

emen

tby

Hug

bG

reen

woo

d(1

989)

isw

orth

rem

embe

ring

wbe

nfo

rmul

atin

gex

pert

opin

ions

base

don

mod

elre

sult

s,'A

mod

elth

atha

sno

pred

icte

dte

stab

leco

nseq

uenc

esis

unve

rifi

able

and.

ifno

tus

eles

s.is

ster

ile.

'P

rese

ntat

ion

ofa

ster

ile

mod

elin

the

cour

t.be

fore

aju

dge

and

jury

,wit

hth

esp

ectr

eo

fvig

orou

scr

oss-

exam

inat

ion.

isn

ota

prud

entl

egal

stra

tegy

.S

cien

tist

san

den

gine

ers

need

tore

cogn

ise

tbat

the

lega

lsys

tem

inth

eU

nite

dS

tate

s.un

like

the

scie

ntif

icm

etho

d.is

no

tdes

igne

dto

find

the

trut

h.It

isde

sign

edto

reso

lve

conf

lict

s.T

hepr

imar

ypu

rpos

eof

aci

vil

tria

lis

toen

da

disp

ute.

Man

yby

drol

ogis

tsw

bote

stif

yin

cour

tar

edi

sapp

oint

edby

the

expe

rien

ce,p

erha

psth

isis

beca

use

thei

rex

peri

ence

dem

onst

rate

sth

atth

ele

gal

syst

emca

nn

ot

alta

inth

esa

me

goal

astb

esc

ient

ific

met

hod.

As

stat

edby

Fed

eral

Judg

eL

ynn

N.

Hug

hes

(199

9),'

Whe

no

ur

lega

lsy

stem

wor

ksat

its

best

,the

cour

tsol

ves

tbe

prob

lem

bya

proc

ess

tbat

resp

ects

the

lega

lcon

vent

ions

,hon

ors

tbe

idea

loft

ruth

,inc

orpo

rate

sth

efo

rce

ofr

easo

n,re

cogn

izes

the

dign

ity

of

the

part

icip

ants

,an

dac

cept

sth

ene

cess

ity

ofa

deci

sion

.'

REF

EREN

CES

Ann

eA

nder

son

etal

.v.

Cry

ovac

.D

ivis

ion

or

W.R

.G

race

&C

ompa

ny;

W.R

.G

race

&C

ompa

ny;

John

J.R

iley

Div

isio

no

rBea

tric

eFo

ods.

,Inc

.;B

eatr

ice

Foo

ds,I

nc.;

Uni

ted

Sta

tes

Dis

tric

tCou

rtro

rth

eD

istr

ict

orM

assa

chus

etts

,Civ

ilA

ctio

nN

o.82

-167

2-S

,19

82,B

osto

n,M

A.

And

erso

n,M

.P. a

ndW

oess

ner,

W.W

.19

92.A

ppli

edG

roun

dwat

erM

odel

ing:

Sim

ulat

ion

0/F

low

and

Adl

'ec­

tiw

na

nsp

ort

.A

cade

mic

Pres

s,Sa

nD

iego

,CA

.B

air,

E.S.

1994

.Mod

el(i

n)va

lida

tion

-a

view

rrom

the

cour

troo

m.

Gro

und

Wat

er,

32(4

),53

0-53

1.B

air,

E.S.

and

Woo

d.W

.W.

1999

.A

Civ

ilA

ctio

n-

wha

tw

illbe

the

lega

cyor

wel

lsG

&H

'?G

roun

dW

ater

,37(2~

161-

162.

Bla

uvel

t,S.

1999

.Exp

ert

scie

ntif

icte

stim

ony

exam

ined

:pa

rt1.

PAG

EO

TE

CH

,N

ewsl

ette

ra

/th

eP

enns

)'l­

ooni

aC

ounc

ilo/

Geo

logi

sts,

9(4)

,2-6

.B

rede

hoer

t,J.

D.a

ndK

onik

ow. L

F.

1993

.Gro

und

wat

erm

odel

s:va

lida

teo

rinv

alid

ate.

Gro

und

Wat

er,3

1(2)

,17

8-17

9.B

row

n,D

.E. a

ndL

aase

,A.1

995.

Stan

dard

Gui

de/o

rC

alib

rati

nga

Gro

undw

ater

Flo

wM

odel

App

lica

tion

C-7

,A

ST

MS

tand

ards

on

Gro

und

Wat

eran

dV

ados

eZ

one

Inve

stig

atio

ns,

Phi

lade

lphi

a,PA

.D

aube

rtv.

Mer

rel

Dow

Pha

rmac

euti

cals

,Inc

.,61

,V.S

.LW

.480

5(1

993)

deL

ima,

V.

and

Oli

mpi

o,J.

e.19

89.H

ydro

geol

ogy

and

sim

ulat

ion

ofgr

ound

wat

erflo

wat

Sup

erfu

nd-s

ite

Wel

lsG

and

H,

Wob

urn,

Mas

sach

uset

ts.

US

Geo

logi

cal

Surv

eyW

ater

-Res

ourc

esIn

vest

igat

ions

Rep

ort

89-4

059.

Dom

enic

o,P.

A.

and

Sch

war

tz.F

.W.

1998

.P

hysi

cala

ndC

hem

ical

Hyd

roge

olog

y.Jo

hnW

iley,

New

Yor

k.F

oste

r,K

.R.,

Ber

nste

in.D

.E. a

ndH

uber

,P.W

.199

3.Sc

ienc

ean

dth

eto

xic

tort

.Sci

ence

.261

.15

09,

1614

.F

ried

land

,S.l.

1990

.The

com

pete

ncy

and

resp

onsi

bili

tyof

juro

rsin

deci

ding

case

s.N

orth

wes

tern

Uni

vers

ity

Law

R"i

ew,S

~8),

190-

220.

Fry

ev.

1)ni

ted

Sta

tes,

293

F.10

13(D

.C.

Cir

.,19

23)

Ger

ber,

RJ.

1987

.Vic

tory

vs.

trut

h:th

ead

vers

ary

syst

eman

dits

ethi

cs.

Ari

zona

Stat

eLa

wJo

urna

l,19

(1),

3-26

.G

reen

woo

d,H

J.19

89.O

nm

odel

san

dm

odel

ing.

The

Cal

ladi

anMineralogist,27(l~

1-13

.G

ross

man

,L.

A.

and

Vau

ghn,

R.O

.19

99.

AD

ocum

enta

ryC

ompa

nion

toA

Civ

ilA

ctio

n.F

ound

atio

nPr

ess,

New

Yor

k.H

arr,

J.19

95.

AC

ivil

Act

ion.

Ran

dom

Hou

se,N

ewY

ork.

Hub

er, P

.19

90.J

unk

scie

nce

and

the

jury

.U

nive

rsit

yo/

Chi

cago

Leg

alF

orum

,T

heR

ole

a/t

he

Jury

inC

ivil

Dis

pute

Re.

wlu

tion

,19

90,2

73-3

02.

.H

uber

, P.

1991

.Gal

ilw

'sR

even

ge:

Junk

Scie

nce

inth

eC

ourt

room

.B

asic

Boo

ks,N

ewY

ork.

Hug

hes,

L.N

.19

99.

Oie

nts,

coge

ncy

&ca

ndor

.th

eco

mpl

icat

ions

or

cons

ulti

ngin

cour

t.A

bstr

acts

with

Pro

gram

s.Geologic~l

Soci

ety0/

Am

eric

aM

eeti

ng,3

1(7)

.A18

1.Jo

st, K

.19

91.

Wei

rdsc

ienc

e.A

mer

ican

Bar

Ass

ocia

tion

Jour

nal,

Oct

ober

.K

enne

dy,

D.

1989

.D

eath

and

Just

ice:

Env

iron

men

tal

trag

edy

and

the

Lim

itsof

Scie

nce.

The

Bos

ton

Pho

enix

,cop

yrig

hted

.ww

w.d

anke

nned

y.ne

t/w

obur

n..Jr

iaL

htm

lM

arsh

all,

P.H

.19

90.

Avi

ewfr

omth

ebe

nch:

prac

tica

lpe

rspe

ctiv

eson

juri

es.

Uni

vers

ity

o/C

hica

gou

ga

lF

orum

,T

heR

ole

o/t

he

Jury

.in

Civ

ilD

ispu

teR

esol

utio

n,19

90,

147-

160.

Mat

son,

J.V

.19

94.

Eff

ecti

veE

xper

tW

itne

ssin

g.2n

ded

itio

n.C

RC

Pres

s,B

oca

Rat

on,

FL

.M

cCom

bie,

C.

and

McK

inle

y,1.

1993

.Val

idat

ion

-an

othe

rpe

rspe

ctiv

e.G

roun

dW

aler

,31(

4),

530-

53l.

Met

heny

,M

.A.

1998

.N

umer

ical

sim

ulat

ion

orgr

ound

wat

erflo

wan

dad

vect

ive

tran

spor

tat

Wob

urn,

Mas

sach

uset

ts,

base

don

ase

dim

ento

logi

cm

odel

of

glac

iofl

uvia

lde

posi

tion

,un

publ

ishe

dM

aste

r's

thes

is,D

epar

tmen

torG

eolo

gica

lSci

ence

s,O

hio

Sta

teU

nive

rsit

y.M

yett

e,C

.F.

Oli

mpi

o,J.

C.

and

John

son.

D.G

.19

87.

Are

aor

infl

uenc

ean

dzo

neo

rco

ntri

buti

onto

Sup

erfu

nd-S

ite

wel

lsG

and

H.W

obur

n,M

assa

chus

etts

.U

SG

eolo

gica

lSur

vey

Wat

er-R

esou

rces

Inve

sti­

gati

ons

Rep

ort

87-4

100.

Ore

skes

,N

.,S

hrad

er-F

rech

ette

,K

.an

dB

elitz

,K

.19

94.

Ver

ific

atio

n.va

lida

tion

,an

dco

nfir

mat

ion

of

num

eric

alm

odel

sin

eart

hsc

ienc

es.S

cien

ce,2

63(F

ebru

ary)

,641

-646

.Pa

celle

.M.

1986

.Con

tam

inat

edve

rdic

t.A

mer

ican

Law

yer,

Dec

embe

r,pp

.75

--80

.P

eter

s,E

.K.

1996

.N

oSt

one

Unt

urne

d-

Rea

soni

ngA

bout

Roc

ksan

dF

ossi

ls.

W.H

.F

reem

an.N

ewY

ork.

Pri

cket

t,T

.A.

and

Pet

tyjo

hn,

W.A

.19

95.

Gro

undw

ater

mod

elin

gan

dli

tiga

tion

.In

:E

I-K

adi,

A.I.

(cd.

),G

roun

dwat

erM

odel

sfo

rR

esou

rces

Ana

lysi

san

dM

anag

emen

t.L

ewis

Pub

lish

ers,

Boc

aR

aton

,F

L,

137-

145.

Sha

w,F

.S.

and

Sou

thw

ell,

R.V

.19

41.

Rel

axat

ion

met

hods

appl

ied

toen

gine

erin

gpr

oble

ms;

VII

Pro

blem

sre

lati

ngto

the

pert

olat

ion

orfl

uids

thro

ugh

poro

usm

edia

.P

roce

edin

gsR

oyal

Soci

ety,

At7

8,1-

17.

Sta

ffor

d.J.

M.

1998

.Geo

scie

nce

and

the

law

.Geo

tim

es,

May

,pp.

18

-22

US

Dep

artm

ent

of

Com

mer

ce,

1997

.St

atis

tica

lA

bstr

act

o/t

he

Uni

ted

Stat

es-

The

Nat

iona

lD

ata

Boo

k,11

7th

Edi

tion

.E

cono

mic

&S

tati

stic

sA

dmin

istr

atio

n,U

SB

urea

uof

Cen

sus,

Was

hing

ton,

D.C

.U

SE

nvir

onm

enta

lP

rote

ctio

nA

genc

y,19

85.

Nat

iona

lP

rim

ary

Dri

nkin

gW

ater

Reg

ulat

ions

:V

olat

ile

Synt

hetic

Ors

anic

Che

mic

als.

40C

FR14

1-14

2,Fe

dera

lR

esis

ter

50(2

19).

Van

Dyk

e,lM

.19

87.T

rial

Cou

rts

and

Pra

ctic

e.In

:Ja

nosi

k.R

J.(ed.~

Ern

:ycl

oped

iao

/th

eA

.mer

ican

Just

ice

SyS

lem

,vo

l.2,

734-

752.

Vos

s,C

.I.

1998

.Gro

undw

ater

mod

elin

g:si

mpl

ypo

wer

ful.

Hyd

roge

olog

y.6(

4),A

4-A

6.W

eins

tein

,J.B

.19

86.I

mpr

ovin

gex

pert

test

imon

y.U

nive

rsit

y0/

Ric

hnw

ndLa

wR

evie

w,2

0(3)

,473

-498

.W

oess

ner.

W.W

.an

dA

nder

son.

M.P

.19

96.

Goo

dm

od

el-

bad

mod

el,

unde

rsta

ndin

gth

eflo

wm

odel

ing

proc

ess.

In:

Ritc

hey,

J.D

.an

dR

umba

ugh,

J.D

.(ed

s),S

ubsu

rfac

eF

luid

·Flo

w(G

roun

dW

ater

and

Vad

ose

Zon

e)M

odel

ing,

AST

MS

TP

1288

,Am

eric

anS

ocie

tyfo

rT

esti

ngM

ater

ials

,Phi

lade

lphi

a,PA

,14

-23.