methods as critical junctures research logics for interpretive qualitative inquiry annette markham...

42
Methods as Cri tical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Upload: evelyn-parrish

Post on 24-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Methods as Critical Junctures

Research Logics

For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry

Annette Markham

Aarhus University

May 9, 2011

Page 2: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

The Saturated Self

Homo NarransInterpretive Sociology

Distributed IdentityEthnography

Individualized RealitiesSymbolic Interactionism

Organizational Studies

Fabrication as Ethical Practice

Annette’s Remix

Erving Goffman

Karl Weick

Michel Foucault

Howard Becker, Norm Denzin

Kenneth Gergen

Page 3: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

“we have to decide fairly soon what it is we as humans ought to become, because we’re on the brink of having the power of creating any experience we desire” (Rheingold, 1991)

“ It will deeply change politics, culture, and the fabric of society—if not, indeed, the very metaphysics of human existence” (Wright, 1994)

“Virtuality through computer mediated communication announces the end of the body, the apocalypse of corporeal subjectivity” (Keeps, 1995)

Early 1990s

Page 4: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 5: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 6: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 7: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 8: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 9: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 10: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 11: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 12: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 13: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 14: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 15: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 16: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 17: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 18: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 19: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 20: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 21: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 22: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 23: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 24: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

“Who should I accept as a friend? Everyone I know or just people I like?” (U.S. teen talking about Facebook)

“What role does social media play in protest movements, like Egypt or Wisconsin?” (everyone)

Should I be angry or try to sue people for spreading my photography all over the internet or just be glad I was noticed? (Noam Galai)

“How can musicians engage their fans through social media?” (Nancy Baym)

2011

Page 25: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Ubiquitous Internet

Increased convergence

Always On, Always Connected

Extensive networks of personal connection

Multiple interfaces for experiencing information

Culture21.c

Page 26: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011
Page 27: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Are methods of sensemaking adequate?

Are our methods still protecting participants?

Why is there (still) a persistent cry for accuracy and truth?

Are we afraid to take risks in methods?

Questions I’ve been asking

Page 28: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Borrow

Interrogate

Move

Play

Generate

Remix or Bricolage

Page 29: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Method is never monolithic. Or static.

Quality is about reflexivity, not universality.

Methods are ethical and political choices. …With consequence.

My Method Mantra

Page 30: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Phenomenon

questions

actions

exploration

collecting

managing

categorizing

interpreting

writing

The Answer

TEXTS…or objects that function as texts, in that they can be “read.”

Page 31: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Phenomenon

questions

actions

exploration

collecting

managing

categorizing

interpreting

writing

The Answer

Phenomenon

Filtered

Through one’s

Situated worldview

whereby meaning is

Framed

Edited, Refined

and

(re) presented

An Impression

Page 32: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Methods = Choices

Hopefully, more like decisions than habits.

Page 33: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

methodmethod

method

method

method

method

method

method method

method

decisiondecision

decision

decision

decision

decision

decision

decision decision

decision

actionaction

action

action

action

action

action

action action

action

Page 34: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

?

??

Critical Junctures / Decision Points

Page 35: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Decision Points Critical

Junctures

Generating Questions

Determining field boundaries

Accessing Participants

Sorting and filtering ‘data’

Collecting Information

Analyzing ‘texts’

Representing self and other in report

Identifying objects of analysis

Sorting into general themes

Discarding information

Interpreting findings

Framing Knowledge for the audience

.

Page 36: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Object of inquiry

What

Why

How

Where

When

Who

Object of Inquiry

Page 37: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Object of inquiry

What is the phenomenon? What are we choosing as the point of analysis?

Why do it? Whose interests does this study serve? What is our goal?

How are we conceptualizing? How are we approaching?

Where are we located and why does that matter? Where is the study situated?

When are we doing research?

Who are the agents/actants, beyond the obvious? Who are we?

Object of Inquiry

Page 38: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Object of inquiryObject of Analysis?

Semiotics

Symbolic interactionism

Social Constructionism

Performance Theory

Organizational sensemaking

Communication as Ritual

Rhetorical Theory

Actor Network

Where are we coming

from?

Structuration

Grounded TheoryEtc., etc.

Page 39: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Object of inquiryObject of Analysis?

Follow the People

Follow the Plot, Story, or Allegory

Follow the Life or Biography

Follow the Thing

Follow the metaphor

Follow the opposites

Where are we going?

Follow the movement

Follow the intersections

Follow the between

Follow the Conflict

Follow the …etc., etc.

Page 40: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Object of inquiry

Object of Analysis?

MIC

RO

What are we

analyzing?

Naturally occurring discourse

Contrived Discourse(interviews, focus groups)

Actions or evidence of actions. Performances.

Traces of self

Cultural/Social OutcomesStructures,

Meaning, Norms, Institutions

Objects, Technologies

Absence. Silence. Deletions.

MAC

RO

Page 41: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

Object of inquiry

Object of Analysis?

Discourse analysis

ConversationAnalysis

Linguistic Analysis

Narrative Analysis

Metaphor Analysis

Visual Analysis

What analytical tools?

Etc., etc.

Page 42: Methods as Critical Junctures Research Logics For Interpretive Qualitative Inquiry Annette Markham Aarhus University May 9, 2011

To DescribeTo UnderstandTo ExplainTo PredictTo ControlTo Critique

To PublishTo Prove YourselfTo get FundingTo get Tenure or Promotion

To provide therapy for cultural members

Social Justice

To create sustainable futures

To fix a problem

Object of inquiry

Object of Analysis?

Why?