meeting 120210 lansing

8/11/2019 Meeting 120210 Lansing

1/34

Small-Scale Anaerobic Digestion:

Technology and Applications

Stephanie Lansing and Andrew R. Moss

Department of Environmental Science & Technology

The University of Maryland, College Park

[email protected] [email protected]


2/34

Outline

U.S. small-scale anaerobic digestion market

International designs and trends

Domestic Research

Future of U.S. small-scale digesters


3/34

As an example:

Dairy Farms in the U.S.

Adapted from: USDA, NASS Farms, Land in Farms and Livestock Operations

Herd Size

(Head Cattle

Number of

Farms in 200

Percent of

Total Farms

1-29 21,280 28.3%

30-49 14,145 18.8%

50-99 22,215 29.6%

100-199 9,780 13.0%

200-499 4,577 6.1%

500-999 1,700 2.3%1,000-1,999 870 1.2%

2,000+ 573 0.8%

Total 75,140 100.0%

71,997 Farms -

95.8% of Total


4/34

Low-Cost, Small-Scale AD Not

traditionally an option

Avg. U.S. Digester Cost: $1.5 million(U.S. EPA, 2006, 2009) 4


5/34

A Brief History of Small-Scale AD

Early Implementation

India - reports as early as 1852(Voegeli & Zurbrgg, 2008)

China - 1920(Nianguo, 1984)

Source: Mi, 2007

Early Government Support China, 1958 - Widespread

dissemination of AD begins(Agromisa, 1984)

India, 1981 - National Project for BiogasDevelopment


6/34

Burns, 2009. Current State of Manure Anaerobic Digestion in the U.S. and Beyond. Energy Productionfrom Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure. Madison, WI. September 28-29, 2009

Over 20,000 worldwide


7/34

Burns, 2009. Current State of Manure Anaerobic Digestion in the U.S. and Beyond. Energy Productionfrom Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure. Madison, WI. September 28-29, 2009

Over 40 million worldwide


8/34

The Growing Market


9/34

Small-Scale AD Globally

China and India lead the

way Increased economic

viability

Spreading widelythroughout Asia, Southern

Africa, & Latin America(Buxton & Reed, 2010)

Cold-climate, small-scaleAD lags behind

Most projects promotingconcept


10/34

International Small-Scale AD:

Numerous DesignsAll attempting to minimize cost & maximize

performance


11/34

Numerous Feedstocks Primary wastes

Animal & livestockmanure

Food waste

Secondary wastes Human manure

Agricultural waste

Sources: (Akinbami, 2001; Bi, 2006;

Voegeli, 2008)

Photo Credits: (U.S. NRCS, Jean Ryder, www.docklandsrecycling.co.uk)


12/34

Use of Products

Biogas Primary: Cooking,

Heating, Lighting(Munyehirwe & Kabanda, 2008; Mi, 2007; Singh & Sooch, 2004 ) Secondary: Electricity

(Lansing et al., 2008)

Effluent Fertilizer

Feed

Solids Compost


13/34

Chinesefixed-dome Floating

Drum

Taiwanese-Taiwanese-


14/34

Floating dome/Floating bell

Indian model

Mixed Waste Waste movement

due to hydrostatic

pressure Internal divider

designed to prevent

short-circuiting High maintenance

(Buxton & Reed, 2010; Lawbuary, 2006; Singh &

Sooch, 2003)


15/34

Fixed Dome

Chinese modeldesigns vary

Janata andDeenbandhu(Buxton & Reed, 2010;Khoiyangbam et al., 2004; Singh& Sooch, 2003)

Mixed waste Less maintenance,

longer lifespan(Buxton & Reed, 2010; Singh & Sooch,

2003)


16/34

Plug-Flow Bag Digesters

Widespread

Intended for highersolids waste

Waste moves in

plugs

Cheap, but history

of problemsw/integrity(Lansing, 2010; Eaton - IRRI Mexico, 2009)


17/34

Taiwanese Model Digesters


18/34

Costa Rica digesters

Tubular Polyethylene

Plastic Bag No Mechanical Parts

Simple to build andoperate

Low-cost ($150-1500)


19/34

Covered LagoonCovered Lagoon

Low maintenanceLow maintenance No heatingNo heating

Lower biogasLower biogasproduction, esp.production, esp.during winterduring winter

Wonderful for odorWonderful for odorcontrolcontrol

http://www.emhttp://www.em--group.co.th/images/cover_lagoogroup.co.th/images/cover_lagoo

n11.JPG


20/34

Predominant problems Lack of skilled technicians

Construction

Maintenance/troubleshooting

Blockages within systems Solids accumulation &associated maintenance

Lack of engineering knowledgefor upgrading

Sources: Munyehirwe, 2008

Photo source: AIDG


21/34

International Trends Mass production of proven designs

Higher quality materials HDPE, Fiberglass

Household and small-community units


22/34

International Trends

Integrated farming systems

(Mi, 2007; Todd, 2006; Marchaim,1992)

Increased government subsidization(Mi, 2007)

Diagram credit: Mi, 2007


23/34

Low-Cost, Small-Scale AD Not

traditionally an option

Avg. U.S. Digester Cost: $1.5 million(U.S. EPA, 2006, 2009) 23


24/34

Dairies Operating in the U.S.

Adapted from: USDA, NASS Farms, Land in Farms and Livestock Operations

Herd Size(Head Cattl

Number ofFarms in 200

Percent ofTotal Farms

1-29 21,280 28.3%

30-49 14,145 18.8%

50-99 22,215 29.6%100-199 9,780 13.0%

200-499 4,577 6.1%

500-999 1,700 2.3%

1,000-1,999 870 1.2%

2,000+ 573 0.8%

Total 75,140 100.0%

71,997 Farms, or

95.8% of the Tota


25/34

Digesting in Cold Climates

Gas production drops with decreasingtemperature Increased retention time

Leads to increased size/capital requirements Maintenance of digester temperature

Leads to higher energy inputs/sophistication of

equipment Additional insulation


26/34

Trend:

Adaptation of tropical models

Credit: Aziza Kenya

Credit: Jay Martin -OSU

U i it f M l d


27/34

University of Maryland -Small-Scale Plug Flow Setup

Influent pre-heated

Effluent recirculated & reheated

Digesters insulated & buried

Hot water circulation for additional heating

U i it f M l d P j t


28/34

University of Maryland Project:

Small-Scale Plug Flow

Aims of research

Economic analysis

Energy yield & system function: unseparated vs. separated manure Contribution of effluent recirculation

Small-scale vs. Continuous Stirred-Tank Reactor (CSTR) on samesubstrate

Emergy modeling


29/34

Additional Small-Scale

Research in the U.S. Ohio State University

Modification of Chinese fixed-dome digester

Designed for small family/farm use

Also looking at effluent recirculation


30/34

Additional Small-Scale Research

in the U.S. University of Wisconsin - Platteville

Compost heated plug-flow digester


31/34

Small-Scale Digestion

Companies

http://www.avatarenergy.com/


32/34

Opportunities & Possible

Avenues of Approach Recognize market

Small-scale farms and waste generators constitutea large market

Scale up, not down Engineering based on viable small-scale designs

Focus on biogas as end-product Heating, cooking, refrigeration

Explore digestion options Co-digestion of food waste(Humboldt Waste Management Authority, 2010; Chanakya et al., 2008)


33/34

The Bioenergy Industry with Smaller-Scale Digesters

U.S. methane emissions reduced

by 5% per year (reduction of 34.5

million tons of CO2 equivalents)

U.S. natural gas consumption

reduced by 25% (equivalent to

1 bil lion barrels of oi l per year)

CurrentWithSmallerScale

Digest-

ers

0

5000000

10000000

15000000

20000000

25000000

US annual natural

gas consumption MMcf/yr

Current

With

SmallerScale

Digest -

ers0

10

20

30

40

50

60

MMt CH 4 emissions

from livestock waste/yr

U.S. potential: 1.8 mill ion applications


34/34

Questions?

meeting 120210 lansing

Documents