media relations
DESCRIPTION
The first university manual really based on modern sociologicsl and cognitive conceptsTRANSCRIPT
-
. .
2013
-
2
32.019.5 76.006.5 56
: , . .
( )
56 , . . : / .. ; . . . . -. , 2013. 250 c.
ISBN
, - , - .
, , - .
, , , - , .
32.019.5 76.006.5
ISBN
.., 2013 , 2013
-
3
.........................................................4 I. 1.1. ....................................8 1.2. ...................................17 II. 2.1. .......................30 2.2. ...................................................................38 2.3. .......49 III. 3.1. ............60 3.2. ..............................................66 3.3. ......................................................76 IV. vs. 4.1. .................85 4.2. ......................................96 V. 5.1. .................115 5.2. - ............................................122 5.3. ..........130 VI. 6.1. .143 6.2. ........................154 6.3. ..................183 6.4. .....193 .205 ......................................................................................209 1. -...................................241 2. -...244
-
4
-
-
, , -
, -
.
-
-
, ,
- . -
- -
, , - -
, .
-
. -
,
. -
-
.
,
-
, - , -
(, ) - . -
()
.
-
, -
( ) - -
.
,
, .
-
5
.
(, - ) . ,
.
-, -
, -
.
, -
. -
, -
. -
-
-, -
. ,
- .
, , -
, -
-
, .. .
, -
.
, -
-. , -
,
-
.
, -
,
. ,
-
,
-
.
-
6
-
,
-
.
, -
, ( -) - , .
, , 22 , , .
-
-
, -
.
-
, -
, ,
.
-
-
,
, , -
-
.
vs. -
-
, , -
-
.
-
,
, -
,
,
.
-
7
-
,
-
, -
.
-
8
I
1.1. 1999 -
(. media politics) [Zaller 1999], - , -
-
.
-
, ( - ), - .
,
,
, , -
,
. ,
, (, ) , (-), - - .
, -
. , -
. -
, -
:
, , -
[Berelson 1951: 122]. , ,
.
-
(, , ..), --, .
(. bardic theory) [Fiske, Hartley 1978],
-
9
,
, -
. ,
, -
,
-
. (- ), , ( -, ), , ,
, -
.
(. issue) ,
(. spiral of silence) [- 1996].
, -
. -
, , -
,
, -
[Shoemaker, Reese 1996: 57]. .
-, (. media consonance) [Reese 1991]: .
-
.
-, (. pack journalism) [Crouse 1973]: -
.
(. groupthink) [Janis 1972], .
-, ,
.
-
10
,
, (.. - ) . - ( (. reverse news cascade)) [Entman 2004].
-
(. news wave [Fishman 1980]), - : , -
,
, [Wolfsfeld 2007: 229]. , -
-, -
.
(. watchdog journalism) [Marder 1998], , , -
. , -
, .
(. burglar alarm), - ,
,
,
[Zaller 2003: 122]. , .
(. monitorial citizen model) [Schud-son 1998] , , -
. -,
. -
,
. ,
, ,
.
, ,
[Rosen 1999: 187].
-
11
, -
, ( - (. symbolic annihilation)) [Tuchman 1981]. -, , -
. -
, -
:
,
-
[Ben-nett, Lawrence, Livingston 2007: 68].
-
, : ,
,
[Barker 2005: 3].
(. outsider counterspin): , -
, -
.
-
,
, -
[Bennett, Lawrence, Livingston 2007: 68]. ,
, , -
, [Noakes, Wilkins 2002: 652].
(. issue dualism) [Bennett 1984]. - , , -
,
.
,
,
. ,
-
12
, -
-
:
, -
, , -
, ,
[ 2000: 231]. - : -
, ,
[Abel 1984: 68]. (.. ) -
( , ) (. media logic) [Altheide, Snow 1979].
-
() . - , , -
-
: ...
,
, ( ) [Gans 1979: 3940].
,
[ ] , ,
-
[Kepplinger 2007: 11]. , - ( ) .
, -
, -
, [ 1994: 184]. ( ) (. cognitive map) [ 1980], - .
-
13
[Tan, Weaver 2007]: 1. (. coverage bias):
; 2. (. statement bias):
; 3. (. editorial endorsements): -
, ; 4. (. citation bias): -
, , -
-
[Ibid.: 8].
, ..
.
:
, , -
. , ,
[ 2005: 43]. , .
, -
, -
, -
, , , . ,
( -
), ( - (. junket journalism)).
, , -
(. gate keepers) [Lewin 1947] , . , , -
(. media logic) [Altheide, Snow 1979] , , , -
-
14
(. real world indicators) [McCombs 1981]. - , , ; , -, , -
; .. -
-,
( ) - . -
(-, , ; ; ; ), -. , -
, -
.
, -
, ..
(. continuity of news) [Galtung, Ruge 1965] . , -
( ) , () - , -
. , -
, -
( -) (. impression-driven model) [Lodge, McGraw, Stroh 1989].
, -
, -
, , ,
-
(. information subsidies) [Gandy 1982]: , -
[Berkowitz 1991: 249]. , -
(
-
15
) - :
, -
, , . -
, ,
, [] , [Sigal 1973: 53]. - , (. chur-nalism) [Davies 2008], - () -
.
-
,
[Shoemaker 1982]: -
( , );
- (, );
, , -, , ;
, -
; -
.
,
. -
, -
, , , -
.
, -
, -
, , , -
[, 2008: 102]. , , -
II (. media policy)
-
16
I (. media politics). -, -
vs. , -
.
, -
- .
, -
,
,
-
. ,
, -
, -
, , , .
, ,
,
,
.
.
( - ), , / .
.
, -
.
1. , .
2. ? 3. , .
? 4. ,
-
.
5. .
-
17
1.2. -
, -
, .
-
- (. PR democracy) [Davis 2002], , , . ,
: , -
, .
, , , , ,
... -
[ 1998: 195]. .
,
:
[] -, , ,
,
[Bennett, Entman 2001: 2]. , - , -
, .
-
(. cumulative ine-quality) [Wolfsfeld 1997]: , -
[Wagner 2007: 2]. -
, , , , -
, :
, -
,
[Entman, Herbst 2007: 208]. - , -
(, , - ).
, -
-
18
,
, ,
[Linsky 1986]. : ,
:
(), , , ,
[Entman, Herbst 2007: 208]. (. economic voting)
[Hetherington 1996], , .
.
: [] [ ] , , , - ,
, , , --, -- -- [Entman 1993: 52]. , , - -
,
- ,
(. real world indicators) [McCombs 1981]. , - .
.
(. manufacturing consent paradigm) [Herman, Chomsky 1988] - : -
, , , -
, -
, , [-] , [Ibid.: 1988: xi]. - -
, , -
, -
. ,
-
, .
-
19
, -
,
.
-
, -
,
- .
, -
,
.
-, ,
,
-
. ,
,
, . -
, -
[Leach 1962: 133]. , - -
- :
46,4% , 72,3% - -, , -
[Leyland 1999]. -, -
. -
,
[Valentini 2006: 8]. , -
, -
, .
,
: -
. -
- , ,
-
20
[Altshull 1984: 277278]. ,
-
:
1. , -
.
2. , -
, -
.
3. , , ,
,
-
. , -
, -
-
. -
, -
.
,
-
, -
. , ,
,
[Herman, Chomsky 1988: 22].
, -
, , -
.
4.
,
-
21
,
, .
5. , , -
: -
,
, , -
, ,
[Ibid.: 29]. ( )
-
( ) , , , - . -
, ,
: [] - ( , , , -) , [Ibid.: 35].
-
, , -
, -
: -
, , ,
[ ] - [Chomsky 1982: 81]. -
: , -
, , ...
, -
, -
[Robinson 2001: 1314]. ,
-
,
[Bennett, Lawrence, Livingston 2007: 189].
, -
-
22
:
, , , ; , -
, , ,
...
, , -
... -
, ,
[Chomsky 1989: 22]. , -
, ,
. , -
,
. ,
:
, ,
-
-
[Herman, Chomsky 1988: 39]. 24 - 2008 .
(. guard dog) [Donohue, Tichenor, Olien 1995], - , -
.
, -
, . -
, , , -
[Iyengar 1991]. (. theory of
indexing) [Bennett 1990]. , -, ,
( ) , - , -
. , ,
-
23
,
, [Bennett, Lawrence, Livingston 2007: 49].
(. news net) [Tuchman 1978], -, , -
. , -
, -
,
, [Bennett 1990: 106]. (.. ) -
(. coalition journalism) [Molotch, Protess, Gordon 1987]. - ,
(, ). , :
, -
-
, -
[Barker 2005: 5]. , , -
[Herrero 2007]. (. political contest model)
-
[Wolfsfeld 1997].
, ,
.
, -
,
,
[Cook 2005]. , , (. media democracy) [Orren 1986]: , -
-
24
.
, -
-
.
-, :
, , -
, , - -
. -
,
[Bennett, Lawrence, Livingston 2007: 3].
-,
, , , ,
.
.
-, :
, , -
-
, , -
[Ibid.: 4]. , , - .
,
-
. , -
, -
[Mazzoleni, Schulz 1999]. ,
, -
. , -
, ,
, .
,
(. spiral of cynicism) [de Vreese, Elenbaas 2008], . -
-
-
25
(. metacoverage) [Esser et al. 2001], - . ,
.
. -
, -
, [ ] , , [Chomsky 1982: 81]. , (. sceptical reflex) [Herman, Chomsky 1988], .
, [] - [Chomsky 1979: 5].
? , ( ) -
, , -
: ,
. -
, , -
-
[Thompson 2000: 105106]. :
, -
, -
[Wolfsfeld 2007: 231]. - ( ) (. mediatisation) [Thompson 1995].
, -
( (. winnowing effect)),
-
26
(. sound bite) [Mazzoleni 2008] ( ).
-
: -
-
, -
, [Entman 1989: 20].
, , -
- -
( (. policy cutting)): - - , , -
, [Kepplinger 2007: 13].
[Kingdon 1984]. , (. prospect theory), -
( ) - , [Kahneman, Tversky 1979]. - ,
, .
,
. -
-
. , , -
, -
: ,
! .
[Strmbck 2008]: 1.
, -
.
[ 2003] , - .
-
27
2. - .
3. - , -
, -
-.
: -
-, , -
, ,
[Altheide, Snow 1991: ixx]. , , -
.
4. - , -
(. permanent campaign) [Blumenthal 1980], .
-
:
, -
: ..,
.
, , -
,
[Zaller 1999: 67].
- -
, - -
[ 2003: 10]. - : -
, a, ,
, , -
, ... ; , , -
. ,
, ... -
[Katz 2000: 129]. : , -
-
28
/ . . - -
, . -
, -
.
, -
-
, [Calhoun 1992: 7]. , -
: -
-
, -
? , , ,
? - ? [Schrder, Phillips 2007: 890891].
-
. -
, -
, -
.
-
.
, ( ) [ 2001] , .
, -
.
1. , .
2. , , - ?
3. . 4.
-
29
? 5. ,
.
-
30
II
2.1. -
, -
( , , , ), - (, , ) . , , -
, -.
, , -
, .. , -
. .
-
, -
, ,
, (-).
-
-
.
-, , -
, , -
.
, ..
? [ 2008a]. 1. -
, , , -
. ,
, ,
() . - , -
, -
-
31
.
, -
.
2. - , -
-
-
.
, -
( -).
3. , , , -
, -
.
- ,
, . -
.
-
( ) , , .
-
, .
-
. , -
,
-
-.
-
(), , (, , ).
-
32
.
. ,
, -
, -
. : , ,
, , ,
. , -
, , ,
-.
, -
. -
, -
.
,
, , , - ( -).
- ,
-
, , , / . , -
[ 1999], . 1. ( )
-
, .
-
, , . , -
, -
-, -
. , , ,
,
-, - ,
, . ,
[Beck, Cowan 2002] :
- ;
-
33
-
; ,
.
-
( ), - , -
. -
-
( -), - , -,
. -
,
-.
2. - -
, , -
.
,
, , . -
, , -
, -
. ,
,
, .
.
3. -.
-
, -
/ . , - , ,
.
,
-
34
.
,
, -
. : -
, ( -), - -.
( -, ), - -, -
-, .
.
, -
( ). ,
,
( - ). , - ( ).
-
:
, -
. , -
. , -
, -
( ).
. -
,
(-). , , ,
-. -
, -
,
, -
. ,
-
35
, ,
.
-
(), -, ( -), . -
,
, -
.
, ( -) , [ 2008a]:
/ ;
, ( );
/ -/ ( -);
/ ;
( - );
/ - ( );
; .
( ) - , -
, . ,
,
( ). , , -
-,
-
36
. , -
, -
( -).
.
-
, -
. -
.
-, , -
( , , , , - ) . -
.
-, .
-, -
.
-, -
, -
.
() - -, -
,
.
.
-,
.
, , -
, , -
, .
-,
-
. . -
-
37
,
.
(-) :
1. . 2.
.
3. , , , -, , .
4. . 5. , -
.
6. .
[ 2008a]. - .
/ - .
. , -
.
, .
, , -
, , -
.
, -
.
() . -
(), - ,
. -
.
, , , - (, ) -
-
38
, -
-
.
-
,
. ,
,
.
, -
, ,
[] .
, -.
, ,
. -
, -
. , -
, .
-
- . ,
, -
.
,
, -
. -
,
, , ,
( ). ,
,
. -
,
,
. , -
, -
.
, -
-
39
- [ 1985], :
; ; (-
, , ); ; ; (). , ,
, .
-
.
1. ? 2.
- ? 3. ,
(-, )? -.
4. , . ? .
5. -, .
? 6. -
( )? 7. .
, -
?
2.2. , , -
, -
. -
-
40
, , , ,
: -
( ), -, , , [Rummel-hart 1980: 33].
( ) - (, , , )
.
( , , ), .
, (.. - ), , , -: , , ,
, [Gamson 1988: 170]. , -
. -
() ( ) ,
-
.
.
, ( , ) - -
, , . -
,
, . -
, -
, , ,
[Tannen 1999: 115]. .
, -
,
-
.
-
41
, , ( ) , . , , -
-
.
( ) , , , , ( ) ( ) [ 2000].
, -
, ,
[Goffman 1974: 21]. - ( ) .
,
, -
. ( ) , -
. -
, , -
. -
.
, -
[ 1979].
,
[, 1976]. , , -
.
, -
-
, , [Benford 1997: 417]. , -
... [ ] , -
[Ibid.: 416].
-
42
[Scheufele 1999]. (. frames in thought) , , , -
, .
(. frames in communication) , -
, , -
[Entman 1993].
/ - () .
, -
,
: -
, ,
[Reese 2001: 11] , , . , -
, ,
, , -
[Gamson 1996: 113]. , ,
-
[Schn, Rein 1994: 23], . , , -
: , -
, ,
, () , -, [ ] , - [Gotsbachner 2009: 50]. ,
, .
- [Hallahan 1999].
.
.
-
43
- .
, , - (.. ).
, , - , - .
, .
.
, , , - - [Gamson 1984].
,
,
[Snow, Benford 1988].
, -
[-, 2008].
, ,
() (. associated implications) [Black 1979], (). -, . -
, , , -
[ 1990: 167].
-
- (.. - ,
-
44
) -. - , , : -
-
, .
, [, 2008: 181]. , - , -
[ 2001]. : -
, , ,
,
[, 2008: 186]. ,
(. self-fulfilling prophecy) [Merton 1968].
( -), ,
(-) - . :
, [ 2007: 87]. -
[ 1990: 159].
,
. , , -
,
, .
, , -
, [, 2008: 185]. (
) , - , -
, ,
[ 2001]. - -
, ,
(
-
45
) [, 1994: 20].
,
, , ,
[ 2001]. , ,
[, 2008], , ,
.
,
, -, -
(), -, - () -.
-
, ,
, , -
. : -
-
,
,
,
[Gots-bachner 2009: 61].
-
, : -
, -
, , ,
[ 2010: 376]. , -
, -
[ 2003]. - - [ 1987]
. ,
, , , , -
-
46
, , , -
(. anecdotal narratives). - [Boswell 2010], (. embedded narratives) [Ryan 1986].
, ,
-
: , -
(, , , , , ), , -
, [Lee, McLeod, Shah 2008: 697].
, -
-
: , -
. , -
, , , -
.
, ,
[Altheide 1997: 652]. .
, -
, -
[Pan, Kosicki 2001: 36], (. advocacy frame contest) [Tewksbury et al. 2000]. (. frame sponsors) [Gam-son 1988] (. discourse community) - ,
[ 1996].
[Gamson 1996]: ,
[Pan, Kosicki 2001]. (. partisan fram-
ing) (. nonpartisan framing).
-
47
,
, , -
: -
,
[Friedman 2006].
, -
[Gamson et al. 1992]. : -
. [] - . -
[Abolafia 2004: 15]. , -
(. collective action frames) - ,
[Snow, Ben-ford 1992: 137].
(. accessibility) , -
(. applicability) [Eagly, Chaiken 1993] . -
(. recency) . -
.
(. hydraulic pattern) [Price, Tewksbury, Powers 1997] - . , -
, -
, -
[Chong, Druckman 2007]. , ,
.
, , ,
, ,
, -
-
48
- ( ) - / - . -
:
-
. , -
, -
, [Zaller 1996: 59].
, [- 2004], , () . -
,
:
[Entman 2004: 1920]. , - , -
, ,
, .
: ,
, , -
, ,
[Gamson et al. 1992: 385]. - , ,
.
1. . 2. . 3. . 4.
.
5. .
-
49
2.3.
,
:
, , -
[Tankard 2001]. ,
,
.
-
. 1991 -
, 1983 , - 1988 .
,
. -
: ,
[Entman 1991: 23].
, ,
,
, ,
[ 1989].
: ,
, -
, [Czarniawska 1997]. , - , -
(. media frame). (. news framing) ,
, -
[Entman 1991: 9], - .
-
-
50
.
, -
, -
, ,
() [Pan, Kosicki 1993]. (.
constructionist model) , (. interpretive package), () - [Gamson, Modigliani 1989].
,
. -
, , -
, , -
[Gitlin 1980: 6]. , ,
. ,
[Miller, Riechert 2001]. ,
,
: , -
, , ( ) , , -
,
[] [Entman 2007: 165]. , ,
.
(. epi-sodic frame / thematic frame) [Iyengar 1991]. - , -
. -
.
-
51
: ,
. ,
( ), [Iyengar, Simon 1994]. ,
-
( ) - ( ) [ 1984].
- .
, -
. - -
, -
[de Vreese, Elenbaas 2008: 300].
, -
, -
[Semetko, Valkenburg 2000]. , ,
, -
.
, , -
[Lee, McLeod, Shah 2008]. -
, ,
, -
. , -
-
.
[Druckman 2004]. (), . - ( ) , ( / )
-
52
.
,
, -
[van Gorp 2007: 66]. , -
:
; ; ; -
; ; .
, -
. : ,
, .. ,
, , , -
[Ibid.: 6667]. , - .
-
, , -
, , -
.
, -
, -
,
[Norris 1995: 359] ( ). , -
.
, -
, .
(. curiosity gap) [Gentry et al. 2002; Loewenstein 1994], -. ,
, ,
-
53
. ,
; . :
, , -
, [Macgilchrist 2007]. -, .
, , -
, -
.
-
. ,
. -
, (. frame map-ping) [Miller, Riechert 2001] - -
-.
, - -
, : ,
,
.
[Hallahan 1999]. (-, ) -
. ,
[Higgins 1996]. - -
.
( ) ,
-
, -
.
-
54
-
(. archetypal narratives) [Jacobs 1996] - , ,
, -
[Tomascikova 2009: 288]. -
[Mazzoleni 1987]: ;
;
;
-
;
-
;
.
, -
, , -
-
[Fiske 1987]. ( - ) , , , , ,
, [Shoemaker, Reese 1996: 106]. - ,
[Entman, Herbst 2007: 203]. -
[ 2011].
-
-
.
,
[Beck, Cowan 2002] , .
-
55
,
, ,
- , .
, ,
.
-, -
,
( ) . - .
,
-
. , -
( - , -
-
) - - .
-, -
. , -
, -
, .
-,
. , -
, -
. ,
, ,
, , ,
, .
, ( ), (, [ 2010]) - :
1. / - (), - ( ) (. - vs. ).
-
56
2. ( ) (. vs. vs. vs.
). 3. ,
[Snow, Benford 1992: 137].
( ) (. vs. , vs. vs. ) [Bruner 2004]. .
, -
-
: -
[Stone 1989: 299]. , - , -
, -
, ,
[Gotsbachner 2009: 61]. - -
, -
( ) [van Hout, Jacobs 2008]. , , -
: ,
- -
. -
[Stone 1989: 283]. ,
,
[Ibid.: 282]. (. causal story) , -, -
,
[Ibid.: 293294].
-
57
-
[Gamson, Modigliani 1987: 143],
[Rein, Schn 1977: 239]. -
, , , , -
[Ochs, Capps 2001: 23].
, -
, -
. -
,
.
[, 2011]. -,
,
. -, -
, . -,
- -
, ,
, -
, () [ : 100101].
-
.
? -,
(, - ). -, , -
( ) (. thematic priming) [Kosicki 2002].
-
: -
, , , -
-
58
, , ,
, . , -
, ( ) , [Entman 2007: 170]. (. interpretive poli-tics) [Abolafia 2004]. / , / - .
(. rhetoric of action) [Gamson, Meyer 1996] - -
. -
(. frame alignment) - [Snow et al. 1986], (. frame bridging) , [Benford, Snow 2000].
(. rhetoric of reaction) [Gamson, Meyer 1996] ( (. counter-rhetoric) [Ibarra, Kitsuse 2003]) - -
:
;
, -
;
-
, -
;
;
/ , , , -
.
(. reframing) [Dearing, Rogers 1996]
-
. -
-
59
: ,
[, 2011: 96]. , , -
, -
-
, -
[Abolafia 2004: 10]. : -
-
[Macgilchrist 2007: 83]. ,
-
[Macgilchrist 2007: 84].
,
, -
, .
-
,
,
-
.
.
1. ? 2.
.
3. , - .
4. . 5.
.
-
60
III
3.1. , , ,
, -
, :
, , -
, , -
, [ 2005: 229]. :
, , -
-
[ 1996: 69]. :
, , -
[van Dijk 1993: 254]. : - , , , , -
() , , [Ibid.: 256] (. [ 1986]).
, -
, :
, , -
, [Foucault 1980: 93]. -
-
, , .
(. politics of signification) [Hall 1982], ,
, -
. -
,
[Wodak, Meyer 2009].
-
61
,
,
,
[Lester, Stewart 1996]. ( ) ,
, , -
: -
, ,
,
. , -
,
[Hayes 2008: 135]. , -
,
[Cobb, Elder 1972: 172] (, , [Fairclough 2005]). : -
. .
, ,
,
[Campbell 1996: 3]. : sine qua non , - ,
[Stone 1989: 281]. , - , -
, . -
,
[Gotsbachner 2010: 1]. , - ( ) (.. ) - .
(. menu dependence) [Sniderman, Bullock 2004], ,
-
62
,
. -
,
. , -
(. public arena) [, 2000] ,
. -
. -
, -
, , , -
,
, [, 2008: 5].
: , -
; , , .
, , , -
,
[Schattschneider 1975: 68]. : - -
, [Reich 1988: 5]. :
. , -
, ,
, ,
[Denton, Woodward 1985: 42]. , -
, , , -
[, 2000: 18]. : (. problem defini-
tion) [],
[Eustis 2000]. , , -
-
63
[Stone 1988: 106]. , , -
,
:
,
,
[Kingdon 1984: 67]. , - ,
, ,
.
, , -
, ,
: , -
, -
, , , -
,
(. social cascade) [Baumgartner, Mahoney 2008: 435]. , , - -
[Coburn 2006: 343344]. , ,
, ,
[Hall et al. 1978: 59]. : , - , ,
.
[Leech et al. 2002]. , [] - [Weick 1995: 35], .. [Mintzberg, Ahlstrand, Lampel 1998].
,
-
64
. : ,
, ,
, , ,
, [Baumgartner, Mahoney 2008: 435].
[Schofield 2000] (. heresthetics). : -
. -
, ,
[Riker 1984: 24]. [Riker 1986]: 1. , ; 2. ; 3. -
; 4. -, .
, -
,
(. news management), , .
, -
, -
.
:
(.. ), , - [Hayes 2008: 135].
(. focusing event) : , , , ,
[Kingdon 1984, 96]. - (. triggering events) [Wolfsfeld 2007] , ,
(. political waves) [Wolfsfeld 2007], , . -
-
65
(. critical discourse moments) [Chilton 1987]
, . ,
/ / . - -
(. issue attention cycle) [Downs 1972], .
: - ,
; -
, [Cobb, Ross 1997: 34].
,
,
. ,
-
, , , .
, -
( ) - .
-,
(. bounded awareness), : - , , -
, ,
[Bazerman, Chugh 2006]. - -
:
, -
.
, , -
, , .
[Simons 1974: 174]. , ( , , - ,
-
66
[Friedman 2006]). -, (. satisficing)
[Simon 1957]. , , - , -
, , -
, .
,
.
-,
(. low-information rationality) [Popkin 1994]. ,
.
-, (. rational ignorance) [Downs 1957]. , (. cognitive misers) [Fiske, Taylor 1991] , .
[Delli Carpini 2004], .
,
.
1. .
2. . 3. ? 4. , -
.
5.
.
3.2. II. II (. media policy)
-
67
-
(. agenda setting) [McCombs, Shaw 1972]. , - ,
. ,
-
,
. , -
-
.
(. public agenda) - ,
- -
. -
, -
?. (. media agenda)
(.. , ), - , -
. -
/ - .
(, ) - .
, -
() () .
, -
, ,
, [Graber 1993: 134]. -
, , (. principle of inertia) [Shaw, McCombs 1977].
-
(. issue attention cycle): - ,
-
68
, ,
[Downs 1972: 38]. - (. threshold of public attention), - S- , [Neuman 1990]:
1. -, (, );
2. - (, );
3. - (, );
4. (, ). /
-
(.. - ). (. time lag in agenda setting) - [Stone, McCombs 1981]. -, mutatis mutandis - -
.
-
(. real world agenda) - , -
, . ,
, -
. , , -
, , , -
, .
,
, .
,
[Stevenson, Gonzenbach, David
-
69
1994]. , -, , , ,
-
[Behr, Iyengar 1985]. ,
.
, -
,
, -
[Sheafer 2007: 24]. , - , -
. :
, [Wanta, Golan, Lee 2004]. (.
issue agenda) (. attribute agenda). () , , ,
, , , .
: -
(. compelling arguments) [Ghanem 1997], . -
, - , -
, , -
.
, -
,
. -
: () -
, [Kiousis 2005]. , - , .
-
- -
, ,
. -
-
70
[Manheim 1987]: , -
; - , ; - -
.
(. macro dynamic model of agenda setting), - (. agenda setters) [Choi 2004]. , -
. , -
, .
, -
, .. -
.
, -
,
[Zhu 1992]. - , ,
. ,
, ,
. , ,
-
,
.
,
[ 2007] . -, [. policy agenda] (, , , ), -
, , . -
-
71
: ,
, , -
[ 2001: 53]. , -
,
[Erbring, Goldenberg, Miller 1980] ( - [ 2008]).
-, -
-
( ), - .
-, -
, . -
(. information-processing model) [McGuire 1985], , - , . ,
[ 1999], , , -
, , , -
. , -
,
, -
:
, -
, [Sabatier, Jenkins-Smith 1998: 145]. , , , -
.
-, -
, .
, -
, ; , ,
, . -
, , -
.
-
72
-, -
-
() . -, (-, ) .
,
(. nonobtrusive issues),
[McCombs 1981]. , [Demers et al. 1989]. , - , -
,
(. associative memory networks) [Collins, Loftus 1975]. , -
. (.. - ) , ,
. -
,
,
[Miller, Krosnick 1996]. , - .
(. priming): () - (, , ) [Meyer, Schvaneveldt 1971]. ,
[Schacter, Buckner 1998: 185].
,
( ) . ,
[, 2005]. , , , , -
-
73
, ,
[Eagly, Chaiken 1993]. (. prospect theory), - , -
[Tversky, Kahneman 1973]. ,
, , -
.
[Jacobs, Shapiro 1994], (. verbal priming). , -
( ) -. -
,
. -
-
, -
[DeCoster, Claypool 2004].
:
, , -
, , -
.
(, , ), - :
, -
,
, [Kiousis 2008]. - -
- (. at-tribute priming) [Kim, Scheufele, Shanahan 2002], (. issue priming) [Iyengar, Kinder 1987] , , .
-
-
74
(. primed encoding / primed reflection) [Hwang et al. 2007]. . ,
, -
-
.
. -
-
- (. spin control / spin doctoring), - ... -
[] , - [Bruce 1992: 141].
(. issue ownership) [Petrocik 1996], , -
. , -
, , -
,
, -
, .. -
.
,
, ,
[Iyengar, Kinder 1987: 63]. , -
? , -
,
[Benton, Frazier 1976]: ( ), , - ,
, -
,
[McCombs, Ghanem 2001]. , - -, -
, ,
[McCombs, Lopez-Escobar, Llama 2000].
-
75
( ), , , - , , -
, ,
[Tan, Weaver 2007: 8]. -.
, -
,
[Scheufele 2000]. - , , -
. ,
, -
,
.
: -
, , -
. , -
,
[Chong, Druckman, 2007: 115]. - , , -
,
[Lee, McLeod, Shah 2008]. , .
-
(. credibility) (. commensurability) (. fidelity), [Snow, Benford 1988].
, (. media agenda setting)
, . -
,
,
. (. media agenda building) -
-
76
( ) / ( ).
-
.
1. ? - .
2. , - .
3. . 4. . 5. -
, ? 6. , -
, ,
.
3.3.
- .
-
. -
, - -
. -
,
, .
,
,
-
[ 2002]: -
.
, , -
-
77
/ . , .
, -, / .
.
- .
- -
, .
-
; -
.
- , .
, , -
. , ,
, -
, , , -
.
[ 2010].
,
.
, .
, -
. - -
, .. -,
[Becker 1991: 343] - , -
[Cobb, Elder 1972: 14]. -,
.
, -
-
78
-
, -
(. decision framing) [Russo, Schoemaker 2002]. [Spiller, Stein, Tommasi 2003] - :
; -
; ,
;
; , -
, .
.
-, ,
[Protess et al. 1987]. - ,
.
-, -
( ) . : X - , Y, , X. , X [Connolly 1972]. , ,
[Kingdon 1984: 91]. -, (. pork barrel) [Ellwood,
Patashnik 1993]. -,
. -
,
. ,
-
79
, -
.
, -
. -
,
[Mayhew 1974]. -, () -
,
.
:
1. - ;
2. , - - ;
3. ; 4. ; 5. ( ). -
.
, [Herman, Chomsky 1988], -- .
(. symbolic agenda / substantive agenda): - . ,
[ ] ...,
. , , : -
, , , -
.. [Walgrave, Soroka, Nuytemans 2008: 818]. (. resource agenda) [Pritchard, Berko-witz 1993] , , - (. decision agenda) [Kingdon 1984] , .
, , :
, ; - , -
-
80
[Walgrave, Soroka, Nuytemans 2008: 818]. ( ) , , ,
[Walgrave, Nuytemans, De Winter 2004]. (. media politicisation): - [, ] [- ] , -, , ,
, -
[Cook 2005: 165]. , - :
1. .
, -
,
, . ,
.
2. . -
, -
[Eilders 1997]. - , , ,
.
-
. -
-: - [ ] , -
, .
, [Entman 1993: 52]. ,
.
3. . , , -
,
. -
-
81
-
-
. ,
.
4. . -
, , -
. , -
, -
.
-
,
[Walgrave, Deswert 2004]. - .
-
, -
.
.
5. . . -
,
, -
. , , -
, , -
[Walgrave, Van Aelst 2004]. ,
,
- . -
, .
-
[ ] - ,
[Pfetsch 1999: 9]. , - .
,
: ,
, -
-
82
. , -
.
6. . : -
... -
, -
[] - ,
[Walgrave, Nuytemans, De Winter 2004: 17]. , : -
,
,
-
[Ibid.: 16]. -
-
,
.
[Pritchard 1992]. - -
,
. -
.
7. . -
-
, , -
. -
, .
8. .
/ - ,
. ,
.
-
83
9. . -
, . -
, , -
,
. -
, ,
.
,
: , -
...,
-
[ 2002: 116]. , ,
, , , -
[Kingdon 1984: 6162], :
,
[Davis 2002: 175]. -
, -
[ 2010]. - .
,
,
, , ,
.
-,
(- ) - -.
, -
, . -
, -
. , -
, ,
, .
-
84
[Kepplinger 2007: 14]. , -
. -
, , -
,
, -
-
.
-
, -
,
[Fuchs, Pfetsch 1996: 10]. -
(, , ) -
-.
, -
.
1. - .
2. . 3. -
.
4. , - .
5. ?
-
85
IV vs.
4.1. -
, , -
. -
,
. -
, -
/ .
. -
, ... , -
, -
, , -
[- 1998: 22].
.
[, 1995],
, ,
[- 1996: 110]. , ,
[Blumer 1966: 535], , , , - [ 1996: 119120].
-
, : -
, -
, -
, : ,
, [ 2000: 151]. -,
-
86
[, 1995: 208], ,
,
[ 2000: 55]. -, , -
, , [ 1996: 90], - -
[Delia, O'Keefe, O'Keefe 1982: 156]. .
,
, -
, [ 2000: 55]. -
,
, , ,
[ 1996: 110]. [ 1985] -
: -
, -
[, 2004: 21]. - ,
, -
, :
,
,
[ : 101]. , -
, ,
- .
, -
, -
- . -
,
(), -
-
87
. , -
,
.
, -
,
. -
-
, .
[ 1998], -
.
, , , . , -
.
,
, , , ,
, , -
:
, -
- , ..
, [Bourdieu 1994: 2324]. , -
: ( - ), : , -
,
[Bourdieu, Passeron 1979: 191192]. , - , ; -, ,
[- 1998].
,
, -
: ... ,
( ) , , , , .. , -
-
88
: -
, [Bourdieu 1972: 182]. , - ,
- -
[ 1998]. ,
; , , , -
. ,
-
[ ]. , -: ,
, , -
[ ]. - - , -
[ ]. -
() , , .
.
-
, , , -
[- 1992]: - , , ,
.
-
, ,
[Jodelet 1990: 361362].
, -
: -
, -
,
-
89
[Forgas 1981: 230]. - , -
( ) : - , -
, -
, , . -
[Billig et al. 1988: 7].
(, , ), , .
, -
, , -
. -
:
, -
,
[Ibid.: 7]. [
2001; 2005; 2007] . , -
, -
.
. , , -
. -
-
.
:
, ( ).
[Bruner 1990; 1998] - -
, -
: , , -
, , -
[Bruner 1990: 34].
-
90
, , -
, , , -
[ 1998: 32]. , , , . , -
, . -
[ : 75].
-
( ), - (), , -, , ,
[Blumer 1966: 535]. -
: - ; ,
, [ 1996: 1516]. , - - -
[DAndrade 1994]. , - [ 2003] - , : , -
,
,
, [, 1995: 41].
-
, ,
, ,
, -
. , - ,
[Fiske 1982].
-
. -,
, [Delia, O'Keefe, O'Keefe 1982], , ,
-
91
, , -
[ 1998, 44, 63]. -
,
, .
, -
. -
-
, -
,
, -
.
-
, -
[-, 1995: 158]. - , -
() , .
-
-
. ,
, ,
-
[] [ 1993b: 148].
.
, - , , ,
, -
, -
. , -
,
.
-
,
-
92
[ 1990]. ,
, -
, . -
-
, . -
,
,
, -
.
-
-
, ,
. -
, .. -
.
[Almond 1970], ,
.
,
,
, , ,
. -
-
,
, -
, .
- [ 1993] -
,
.
,
, ,
-
93
, -
, .
,
. ,
-
.
, -
-
: -
, -
-
[ 2001: 52]. -
-
, . -
-
[ 2002]. , -
, - ,
[Barker 1990], .. . :
,
...
, ,
,
, ,
[ 1993: 90]. [ 1993], .
( ). , ,
-
, -
[Lipset 1959: 77]. , ...
, , , , ,
-
94
, -
[Dahl 1965: 19].
, -
, -
[George 1989: 584]. , -
[ 1993a].
[ 2011]. , ,
, , -
, -
,
.
-
. , -
( ) , -
[ 1993b: 323]. -
, , -
-
,
.
,
-
[ 2010]. - ,
.
-
,
-
95
(. discursive legitimacy) [van Leeuwen, Wodak 1999], [ 2002; 2009].
, , -
-
. -
? : , ,
,
[Domhoff 1979: 169]. (. ),
-
.
,
. -
,
, -
, -
[Karppinen 2007: 498]. , -, -
-
. (. narrativization) , , [Vaara, Tienari, Laurila 2006].
,
-
, : -
, , , -
, ,
[ 2010: 371]. (.
relational model of procedural justice) [Blader, Tyler 2003], - , ,
, , -
.
-
96
, , ,
, , -
[Thibaut, Walker 1975].
,
, -
,
( ), - .
, ? [Benhabib 1996: 74]. , -
( , -
). (. deliberative democracy / discursive democracy) [Dryzek 1990].
.
1. .
2. . 3. . 4. ? 5.
.
4.2. (. deliberation) ,
, ,
,
, , -
-
97
,
[Dryzek 2009: 1391, 13811382].
, , -
[Ibid.]. -
,
[Mansbridge et al. 2006]. ,
,
-
,
[Dryzek 2001]. : ,
,
-
[Hunold 2001: 154].
, , -
,
, -
[Schmitt-Beck 2008]. , - , -
; , , , ; , - ,
[Parkinson 2003].
.
; ,
[Fearon 1998]. , - -
, , ( ) [Englund 2006].
-
98
-
, -
: ,
, ,
, -
. : -
, -
, -
,
[Chambers 2003: 309]. -
:
-
,
. ,
, , -
[Wessler 2008].
,
-
.
, -
, , -
, [] , [Besson, Marti 2006: xviii]. , , ,
, -
.
-
, [Schneiderhan, Khan 2008]. , -
, , , -
, , , -
-
99
[Fung 2006: 67]. -
.
, -
[Blumenthal 1980], , -
, , -
: -
,
-
, -
[Reich 1988]. -
[He-clo 2000: 17], ,
[Bennett, Manheim 2007: 282]. [Manheim 1991] , , -
, -
, , [Heclo 2000: 15]. , :
: , , -
[Ibid.: 13]. , ,
[] [Loomis 2000: 162]. ,
( ), : , , -
, -
[Heclo 2000: 14]. , - , , , ,
, , ,
[Ibid.: 33]. : ,
[Lafont 2006: 12].
-
100
-
[Pettit 2001]. -,
( - ).
-, -
.
-,
.
,
, , -
-
[Kies 2010]. [Bchtiger
et al. 2010]. I , -
, , -
.
II , -
-
[Ibid.: 33]. , -, (. discourse quality index) [Steenbergen et al. 2003]. , - , , -
, , -
, .
, -
-
( ), ( ) [Bobbio 2010]. (, ), (, -), (-,
). ,
-
101
,
, : -
, , [Ibid.: 18].
-
( II), :
1. (. public spiritedness): - , -
,
-
: ,
-
[Dryzek 2002: 68]. 2. (
) (. discursive equality / discursive reciprocity): ,
, .
-
. -
, -
,
.
, .. [Williams, Rice, Rogers 1988].
3. (. plural agreement): , : ,
, [Hartz-Karp 2007]. -, ,
: -
. -
.
, , -
-
102
, -
[Cohen 1989: 21]. , -
,
[Besson, Marti 2006: xix]. -
:
, ,
,
[Gutmann, Thompson 1996: 26]. 4. (. acceptability of arguments): -
, -
, [Cohen 1989: 20]. , ,
, ,
[Fung, Wright 2003: 17]. , ,
[Sancho 2003: 6]. 5. (. inclusiveness):
, , , .
,
,
[Dryzek 2001: 651]. -
[Hunold 2001: 159]. 6. :
, -
. -
,
, -
. , -
, -
[Ibid.].
-
103
(. deliberative democracy): - -
-
,
[Cohen 1989: 19]. , -
c :
-
-
[Parkinson 2003: 180]. , , , , : -
, -
, [Gastil, Burk-halter 2008].
,
-
, (-) , [Gutmann, Thompson 2004]. ,
,
.
, , -
. , , ( , - ), - , [Sancho 2003: 3]. ,
-
[Bohman 1998: 401].
- [Hendriks 2002]: , ,
, , -
, , -
-
104
[Wessler 2008]. , , -
, , -
,
[Crosby 1995]. (. terated delibera-
tion) [Gutmann, Thompson 2004], - , -
, ,
..
, -
.
-
, -
[Dryzek 2009]. - , ,
(. competitive authoritarianism) [Levitsky, Way 2002], - , - -
, .
,
. -, -
: -
. -, :
-
, . -
, : -
-
[Hunold 2001]. , -
, -
:
1. : ,
,
-
-
105
, . -
, -
:
-
( -) [Wessler 2008]. - , .
2. : -
, .
.
3. : - ,
. -
( ) , [Parkin-son 2003: 182].
, :
, , ,
, -
, , ,
, .
.
, ,
, ,
( ), [Parkinson 2003: 186].
, , -
, -
[Besson, Marti 2006]. , -
-
106
,
, -
, ,
[Elster 1998: 12]. - ,
, -
,
[Sancho 2003]. (. civilizing force of hypocrisy) [Elster 1998] , - -
, -
. , -
( ) - .
, -
.
,
, [McGann 2006]. - .
-
[Fung 2006]. - -
, -
,
-
.
-
(. deliberative theory of interest rep-resentation) [Mansbridge 1992], , -
.
.
,
,
[Naurin 2006]. -
-
107
.
,
,
, -
[Thompson 2008]. , - -
, -
. -
() -, ,
[Naurin 2006: 192]. ,
-
. -
,
,
-
[Schfer 2010].
(. discursive dilemma) [Pettit 2001], -
, -
.
, ,
, ,
[ 1995: 199]. , - -
. : ,
, , [] , - , -
, [Lafont 2006: 89].
-
108
(. rational ignorance) [Downs 1957] , -
,
. , ,
,
[Somin 2010: 254]. (. ra-
tional irrationality) [Caplan 1999]: - .
, ,
, .
, , , -
, -
, ,
.
: , , -
...
. -
, -
[Somin 2010: 264]. , , , -
, . -
, ,
, ,
[Galston 1991]. , .
: , -
, , -
[Neuman 1991: 95]. : , , [Bennett 1996: 2223]. , - , , -
, ,
[Deneen 2008: 71].
-
109
,
, , -
(. insurgent democracy) [Dryzek 2000]. , -
-
[Friberg-Fernros, Schaffer 2011]. -
,
-
.
, : -
-
-
, . -
, -
. -
, -
[McGann 2006].
, -
, -
, -
[Chambers 1996]. - , , -
.
(. testimony) - ,
, -
[Sanders 1997]. , - -
.
.
-
110
, -
, , , ,
.
,
, -
,
[Chambers 2009: 341342, 345]. - (. political pandering) [ 1995]: - , . [-], , , , ,
-
[Chambers 2009: 343]. : -
, ,
, -
-
[Jacobs, Shapiro 2000: 7].
-
(. oratory model / conversation model). , - , , -
.
,
[Remer 2000]. , -
, ,
[Weaver et al. 2007]. (, - ) , ( - ), - [Marsden 1987]. ( ) - , -
.
-
-
111
,
, -
( ). - . , -
: -
, -
, , -
[Wessler 2008]. - , ,
, : -
, [Parkinson 2003: 184]. ,
(. scale problem). , ,
, -
[Dryzek 2001]. , -
,
, . , -
. ,
,
-
, . , -
, ,
[Dryzek, Niemeyer 2008: 493]. : , -
, , -
[Ibid.: 485]. , (-, -
), , - .
,
( , )
-
112
(. descriptive repre-sentation) [Pitkin 1967], .
[Arnstein 1969]: 1. ( -): -
, ,
; 2. : ,
; 3. :
,
; 4. : ,
; 5. : ,
; 6. : -
-
.
-
, -
, -
, ,
: [] [ ] - ,
[Hibbing, Theiss-Morse 2002: 191]. , (. logrolling) [Miller 1999]
.
, y, - x.
. x y, , , [Ibid.].
-
113
,
,
[Riker, Brams 1973]. -
-
, -
, ,
, -
. ,
, ,
[Sanders 1997: 348]. ,
, -
,
, , -
[Somin 2010]. , :
, .
, -
. -
:
[ 1995: 347]. , -
,
, ,
, , [Sanders 1997]. - : -
-
. -
,
[, 2003: 505]. (. policy delib-
eration) :
, .. , , -
-
114
. , -
,
[Stone 1988: 138]. -
.
1. . 2. , . 3. ? 4. ? 5.
? 6. ,
.
7. .
-
115
V
5.1. -
(. narrative control) [Gubrium, Hostein 2008] -
, , : -
, ,
[Ibid.: 260]. .. , (. utilitarian story / autotelic story) , -
[Ryan 2009]. - , , -
[Freedman 2006: 22], .. .
(. story coercion) [Luhman 2005] - ,
[White 1987: 167]. -,
.
: , -
, ,
.
; , -
, -
[Boswell 2010]. -
,
, -
[Roe 1994: 2]. , -
,
(. discourse coalition) [Hajer 1993],
-
116
.
(. policy narrative) , - , -
[ 2007] - , -
[ 2007], . [Jones, McBeth 2010] , , -, [Boswell 2010]. : (. narra-tives of decline) , -, (. narratives of control) [Stone 1988].
(. policy narrative) - ( ) , - -
, -
[Boswell 2010]. , ,
: -
, , (, , , (. is-sue stakeholders) ) - [Ibid.].
-
, , -
,
[Ibid.]. ,
( ) : [Delori, Zittoun 2009: 3]. -: , , -
, -
, . -
, [-] [Ross 2011]. -
-
117
: -
, -
[Chong, Druckman 2007: 111]. (. elaboration likelihood
model) [Petty, Cacioppo 1981], (- ), ( ) - .
(. transportation imagery model) [Green, Brock 2000], - , ,
, -
[Green, Brock 2000]. [Page, Shapiro, Dempsey 1987] -
-
. , , -
. ,
-
.
(. exemplification) [Zillmann 2002] ,
. -
-
[Braverman 2008]. - -
, .
, -
,
,
, [Brosius 1999]. -
. , , -
, -
[Beck, Cowan 2002]. -
.
-
118
, -
.
-
, -
.
-
, -
, ,
.
, -
, .
(. hard news) , -
.
(. reception-acceptance model) [Zaller 1992], - .
-
, , ,
, -
: ,
, , -
[Baum 2004: 315]. - , -
-
. ,
, -
. ,
(. soft news), .
, , -
, -
, , -
- : ,
, -
( ) , , , , -
-
119
[Baum 2002: 94]. - (. cheap framing) [Baum 2004] - -
. ,
,
, [Iyengar 1991]. :
,
. , ,
.
, , ,
[Mulligan 2012: 3]. (. incidental by-
product model) [Baum 2002], , - , , -
.
, ,
, , (. Oprah effects) [Baum, Jamison 2006]. -
, -
.
: -
, -
[Gamson et al. 1992: 387]. , , - , , -
, : -
, . -
. -
. -
[Fulton et al. 2005: 1]. : ,
, -
[Tomascikova 2009: 287].
-
120
(. fictional media) , , , ,
: , -
, , ,
- [Mulligan 2012: 34]. - : , -
(. human interest sto-ries), , .
, [Gerrig, Prentice 1991; Green 2004]. ,
(. narrative perceived realism). (. external per-ceived realism), . : ,
,
, -
, .
, , -
, ,
. ,
, , -
[Mulligan 2012: 4]. , ( - ) -,
.
(. fictional framing) [Ibid.] (. narrative policy) [Jones, McBeth 2010], - ( ) - . -
, 80% [Cameron, Sallot, Curtin 1997]. : ,
-
-
121
,
[Bennett, Edelman 1985: 158, 170].
,
. : ,
-
, . ,
,
,
[Zaller 1999: 59]. :
,
[Sellers 2010: 221]. :
[-]. - , , ,
[Shoemaker, Reese 1996: 117]. , -, , , -
[Mazzoleni, Schulz 1999]. , -, -
[Schrder, Phillips 2007], , , - .
-
(. pseudoevents) [Boorstin 1962], :
-
[Esser, Spanier 2003]. - , -
,
[Swanson 2004]. (. de-
thematization) [Plasser et al. 1996; Pfetsch 1999], .. , .
, , -
-
122
, -
. , -
21 2012 -
( -), .
:
-
, [Bennett 1992: 403]. : -,
. , -
. (. news management) [Pfetsch 1998].
, -
.
1.
.
2.
? 3. .
4. , -
.
5. - , .
5.2. - , XX -
-
, , , -
, , , -
, -
[Blumler, Kavanagh 1999].
-
123
, -
, -
, -
, -
[Ibid.: 213]. , .
,
, -
, -
[Ibid.: 214]. - , -
, -
, .
-
, , - -
(. spin) [Maltese 1994; Sumpter, Tankard 1994]: - .
,
, [Esser, Reinemann, Fan 2000: 216]. -
[Andrews 2006]. ( -
) [Pearson, Patching 2008], - (. deliberate priming) [Medvic 2001].
,
-
: , -
, -
[Esser, Spanier 2005: 34]. ,
,
[. advocacy story] , . , - -
, , ,
, .. ,
-
124
[Stockwell 2007]. , ,
, [Rosenstiel 1994: 309]. - : , -, -
, [Jones 1995: 169].
- -
, -
:
-
, - [Esser 2008: 4785].
-
: -
-
-; - -
[Craig 2003: 84]. , -
.
- ,
,
, -
(. off the record) (. leak). -
,
,
(. press gallery folklore) [Dale 1985]. - [Richardson 2002].
,
. , , , -
-
.
-
-
125
( ) , - ( ) . -
, .
- (. sound bites), (. buzzwords) (. image bite), , - .
,
[Esser, Reinemann, Fan 2000; Gaber 2000; Pitcher 2002; Starick 2005]: 1.
-
; 2. ,
; 3. -
; 4. -
:
5. ;
6. ;
7. - ;
8. ;
9. , .
(. politics of blame avoidance) [Edelman 1977] -
(. PRisation of news) [McQueen et al. 2011].
-
126
,
(. churnalism) [Davies 2008] -. , -
, ,
. ,
-
-,
.
-
, ,
,
[Esser et al.: 215]. , ,
( ) ,
. - (. meta-coverage) [Esser, DAngelo 2003] - [Esser et al.: 218] [Stockwell 2007].
, , , - -
.
, [Larsson 2009].
,
, , -
[Plasser 2005: 53], - -
.
( ) ,
. ,
, -
,
, , -
, - -
[Stockwell 2007: 130]. , -
-
127
, (. pub-licity officer), .
, -
(. story teller), . -
(. message) .
- -
, -
(. strategic coherence) [Svet 2010]. , , (. line of the day) (. stay on message).
-
II, - .
-
/ -
, -
. , -
. , -
, -
-
-
[Karppinen 2007: 17].
-
.
-,
-
. , -
.
. -
[ 2006]. ,
-
128
.
,
-
- -
. -
,
[ 2006: 33].
,
, ,
[, 2008: 112]. -, -
. ,
, -
[, , 2002]. -,
-
, -
:
[ 2000: 410411]. -
(. information policy),
[Braman 2011]. : - , , -
, - ,
[ 2003: 38]. , -
. -
-
, -
-
129
, .
, , .
-
( ) - , -
:
-
, ,
, , , -
-
, [ 2004: 180]. - : -
, , ,
, . , -
-
[ 2006: 1]. , -
-
[ 2011]: :
; : -
, ; : -
; :
; :
; : -
() ; :
; : (-
) , - ;
-
130
:
; : -
-
; : , -
, .
, , -
.
1. - -
.
2. -.
3. , - -
.
4. , , -
.
5. . ?
5.3. :
1. - .
2. .
3. - .
4. / .
5. - .
-
[Broom, Dozier 1983; Phillips 1992; Lindenmann 2002; Grunig 2006; -, 2006; Macnamara 2009], - - , .
.
-
131
-, - .
-, , -
. -
-.
-
, -
. -
,
- . - -
- , -
. -
.
,
, -
.
:
1. - -
-
-; 2. -
, , -
-; 3.
-
-
; 4. -
; 5.
-
.
, -
, , .
-
132
I. . -
- -
. -
-
.
:
, -
; , ( -
), ; , -
(- ).
, -
. -
? -,
. , -
,
.
-, , -
. -
,
.
-, ,
(, , ). -
, -
. -
, -
, , , -
-
133
, ,
. -
,
.
,
- -
.
,
, ,
. , -
.
,
, , , -
, , , , -
, -
.
(. problem definition) (. decision framing) [Russo, Schoemaker 1989] , , .
II. . :
1. - (, , , , ..). ,
,
.
2. - / .
3. .
4. ( )
-
134
(.. ). 5. , -
.
6. - (, , -, , ). - , , -
, , , , -
, , -
.
7. - , -.
III. .
, -
.
/ - / . -, ,
, -
. -
.
IV. . , -
,
, -
.
V. . -
.
,
, , -
-
.
-
135
VI. . -
-
, , -
, . -
( ), , -
( ), ,
/ . , - -
[Hirsch 1986]. , -
, ,
. -
.
VII. , . -
, .
-
:
1. , ..
.
2. - , .
3. - :
-
.
4. .
:
- -
; - -
-
136
;
;
; -
( ) ; -
( ) ;
, ; -
, ,
;
, -
; -
- ; -
, ,
, ;
, ; -
; -
, - -
;
(, , ) - ;
- ,
; , -
, , ,
-
137
; -
; -
-
; -
; -
..
( ); -
-
; -
- ; -
; -
; -
; -, , ,
; -
;
;
; .
VIII. . -
, -
-,
-
138
.
:
1. , ;
2. ;
3. - ;
4. ; 5.
; 6.
; 7. -
; 8. ,
.
9. -
-
, (. crossmedia) (. transmedia) [Jenkins 2006].
IX. (). , -
.
. ,
, . ,
,
.
X. . -
- -
, -
[Todorov 1971; Chatman 1978; Bruner 1990; Ryan 2009]. -
-
139
- ( ) - ,
. -
, , -
, , -
, , -
.
[Stone 1988], : - (1) (2) (3) (4) .
, : (2+3), (2+4), (1+3) (1+4). : , . -
-, , -
, , [Stone 1988, 293]. : .
,
[Stone 1988, 289].
(. tellability), , , [Ryan 2009]. (. stock story) [Amsterdam, Bruner 2000] , ,
,
[Hnninen 2004, 7374].
:
1. ; 2. ; 3. ; 4. -
( , - , , , ,
, , , -
-
140
); 5. ; 6. ; 7. ; 8. -
; 9. ; 10. () .
XI. . -
, -
, .
-
,
.
, - -
, .
( ) , . -
:
-
; -
, ; -
; ; -
; () -
, ;
() ( ). :
1.
-
141
, .. -
() - ;
2. ;
3. , ,
.
, -
-. -
(-, , ), - , , -
.
-
, .
, -
.
, -
. -
(. narrative policy) [Jones, McBeth 2010] - ,
.
, -
-
, -
. -
-
,
.
: , -
- ,
-
[ 1998: 115]. - , -
-
142
,
, -
. , -
-
, -
,
- , -.
,
, -
.
1. . 2. . 3. . 4. , . 5.
.
-
143
VI
6.1. -
-
, ,
( ) - . -
, -
,
. , ( ) .
.
- -
-
,
( ), (- ). , , , / - , .
, -
,
/ - ,
, . -
(), ,
-
( ). () , , -
-
. -
, ,
-
, ( ). , -
-
144
.
, ,
.
,
.
1. , ,
.
2. , - . -
. -
, ,
( ), -. .
3. , - () . ,
.
-
, , , ,
, , -
, , -
.
,
-
, -
-
, , - .
.
-
, [ 2008b].
, ,
,
, -
-
145
. , -
.
. , ,
,
, . ,
-
- , - ,
( -).
- , , -
, -
, -
, -
, , ,
. , -
,
-
, .
,
.
, -
- , -
. () -
( ).
,
( ). 1. -
,
.
.
2. , -
-
146
. -
-
. ,
, -
.
3. , -
.
-
. -
,
.
: -
-
, , (-, ) .
, -
-
.
-
,
( ), , (, ). - , ,
,
, .
- -
, ,
,
, -
. , -
, , -
. -
, -
, -
-
147
[ 2004].
-
( ). -
( ),