med 7701 dr. joseph massare jessica baker & cheryl cresci
TRANSCRIPT
MED 7701
Dr. Joseph Massare
DPAS II
Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci
1. Planning & Preparation2. Classroom Environment3. Instruction4. Professional Responsibilities5. Student Improvement – Doesn’t count this
year
2011-2012 Five Components
DPAS II ProcessStep One:
2010-2011School Wide Goal
SetTeacher Goal
Setting ConferenceAligns with School
Goal
2011-2012 RevisionStudent Growth
Measurement Conference
Student Growth Measurement Form Completed
Pre-Observation FormAnnounced observation Optional for experienced teachers if
administration & teacher both agree
Pre-Observation ConferenceTeacher discusses Component OneTurn in Professional Development Form (if not
done)May discuss Component Four Have lesson plans & artifacts
Step Two: Pre-Observation
Step Three -Observation“Experienced” Teacher –
(Continuing or Advanced License/or Standard or Professional Status Certificate Prior to August 1,
2003) Tenured Teacher Satisfactory
1 Announced1 Summative every two
years
Unsatisfactory1 Announced1 Unannounced1 Summative each yearImprovement Plan
Revision-Experienced TeacherRated: “Highly Effective
or Effective” on Summative
Experienced TeacherRated: “Needs
Improvement or Ineffective” on Summative
“Novice” Teacher Initial Licence(Non-Tenured)
2 Announced1 Unannounced1 Summative each year
If they have “Needs Improvement” & “Ineffective” on their Summative it can require more observations with their Improvement Plan
Should be at least 30 minutes longCan not occur during the first or last 5 days of school
Observation
Lesson Reflection Form- optionalConference within 10 days of observationTakes place in the teacher’s room if possibleTeacher & evaluator discuss data collectedUpdate Professional Responsibilities Form if
needed
Step 4 Post-Observation
At the end of the Post-Observation Conference teacher and evaluator should have an understanding of the teacher’s performance during the evaluation.
Step 5 – Level of Performance Ratings
Formative Feedback Form- Required for announced & unannounced
Must be given to teacher within 10 days of observation
Teacher signs & returns form within 5 days. This is not for agreement but acknowledgement
If teacher disagrees- 15 days to submit in writing
Teacher can request second conferenceFormative Feedback Documentation placed
on DDOE’s online Education Reporting System
Step 6 Formative Feedback Documentation
Review all documents for full cycle: Student Growth Measures Selection Form(s), Professional Responsibilities Form(s), Formative Feedback Form(s), and other relevant written communications from evaluator.
Collect data, track, and analyze progress toward attaining Component 5 goal(s).
Step 7 Summative Evaluation Conference
Within 10 days of the Summative Conference evaluator fills out Summative Evaluation Form
Components One to Four teacher is rated either “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory”
Component Five (which doesn’t count this year) teacher is rated:80-100% “Exceeds”50-79% “Satisfactory”Below 50% “Unsatisfactory”
Step 8 Summative Documentation Process
Part I – School Wide 30% All Staff Option 1 Reading DCAS Scores Option 2 Math DCAS Scores
Best results for “AYP” Fall-Spring Growth Calculations
Part II – Student Cohort 20% DCAS teachers (Grades 3-10) All students
DCAS Instructional Scores – Fall to Spring Growth Model Non DCAS teachers (Grades 3-10)
Select cohort ahead (min 25)
Part III- Teacher Specific Measures 50% A Non DCAS Assessment
Approved by Department of Education & Secretary of Education Directly tied to teaching assignment
Component 5 2011-2012 Data
If school doesn’t have Part IIIThen teacher evaluated on:
Part 1 = 30% Part 2 = 70%
If school doesn’t have Part IIPart 1 = 30%Part 3 = 70%
If school doesn’t have Part II & Part IIIPart 1 = 100%
If missing Parts:
“Satisfactory” Met criteria in at least 3 of the 4 components
“Unsatisfactory” Did not meet criteria in 2 of the 4 components
If Unsatisfactory then put on an Improvement Plan
2011-2012 Summative Evaluation Ratings
"Highly Effective" means:Satisfactory in 4 of the 5 components including
a rating of “Exceeds” for Component Five.
"Effective" means:Satisfactory rating in at least 3 of the 5
components including the Component V, but the teacher does not meet the student growth requirements for a "Highly Effective" rating.
2012-2013
"Needs Improvement" means: Has earned 1 or 2 satisfactory ratings out of the 5
components including a satisfactory rating in Component Five, or
Has earned 3 or 4 satisfactory ratings out of the 5 components and the teacher has earned an unsatisfactory rating in Component Five.
"Ineffective" means: Has received 0, 1, or 2 satisfactory ratings out of the 5
components, and the teacher has received an unsatisfactory rating in Component Five, or
The teacher's overall Summative Evaluation rating is "Needs Improvement" for three consecutive years. In this case, the teacher's rating is re-categorized as “Ineffective.”
Resources:
State of Delaware (Oct. 2011) DPAS II Delaware Performance Appraisal System Retrieved from: http://www.doe.k12.de.us/csa/dpasii/default.shtml
The following criteria and elements are evaluated under Component 1 1a. Selecting Instructional Goals
1b. Designing Coherent Instruction
1c. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy
1d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students
1e. Designing Student Assessments
Component One –Planning & Preparation
2a. Managing Classroom Procedures
2b. Managing Student Behavior
2c. Creating an Environment to Support Learning
2d. Organizing Physical Space •
Component Two
3a. Engaging Students in Learning
3b. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness
3c. Communicating Clearly and Accurately
3d. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques
3e. Using Assessment in Instruction
Component Three
4a. Communicating with Family
4b. Recording Data in a Student Record System
4c. Growing and Developing Professionally
4d. Reflecting on Professional Practice
Component Four