mdt in trapping of brown - northeastipm.org · with mdt in trapping of brown ... guillermo cabrera...
TRANSCRIPT
Synergy of aggregation pheromone with MDT in trapping of brownwith MDT in trapping of brown
marmorated stink bug
Donald C. Weber, Ashot Khrimian USDA ARS Invasive Insect Biocontrol & Behavior Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland
T C L kTracy C. LeskeyUSDA ARS Applachian Fruit Research Station, Kearneysville, West Virginia
Guillermo Cabrera WalshFundación para el Estudio de Especies Invasivas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Plautia stalid k bBrown‐winged green stink bug
ggregation pheromone is methyl (E E Z)‐2 4 6‐ggregation pheromone is methyl (E,E,Z) 2,4,6decatrienoate (MDT); produced by male and attractive to both males and femalesattractive to both males and females
MDT attracts other insects which do not produce it! Halyomorpha halysproduce it! Halyomorpha halys
Glaucias subpunctatus Chi i hilChinavia hilare+ several tachinid species
DT attracts other pentatomids which do not produce it. This cross‐attraction is not uncommon and includes other stink bug species; why?
food signal for polyphagous speciesg p yp g poverwintering site signalpromotes aggregation which passivelypromotes aggregation which passively
protects them from natural enemies
Halyomorpha halysBrown marmorated stink bug
Asian nativei t MDTresponsive to MDT
... but in most years,... but in most years, almost exclusively late in the season
Halyomorpha halysBrown marmorated stink bug
Asian nativei t MDTresponsive to MDT
... or, during outbreak... or, during outbreak years (axis is 60 vs. 10 to 30 in subsequent years)
Halyomorpha halysBrown marmorated stink bug
Asian nativei t MDTresponsive to MDT
... and occasionally in the... and occasionally in the early season
Halyomorpha halystures using black pyramid s baited with MDT (50mg)
Brown marmorated stink bugg
A & MD apple orchards, 2011Asian nativei t MDTresponsive to MDT
but usually onlybut usually only after harvestof apple crop,in late season
Halyomorpha halysBrown marmorated stink bugBrown marmorated stink bug
scovery & availability of BMSB pheromonein quantities useful for field bioassays by early 2012q y y y
H
* * *
10 11 1 bi b l 3 l
OHO * **
10,11-epoxy-1-bisabolen-3-oltotal 16 stereoisomers
SSRS RSRS
Halyomorpha halysBrown marmorated stink bugBrown marmorated stink bug
ith... knowledge of seasonally‐limited attraction of MDTnd... discovery & availability of BMSB pheromoney y p... an isomer mixture which we knew had comparable
attractiveness to pure isomers ...
e set up a simple factorial experiment:
BMSB pheromone (mixed isomers with ~2mg of SSRS)p ( g )
MDT (66mg)
BothBoth
Neither
bl k id MD 2012 13 d WV 2012 RCB l l )black pyramid traps, MD 2012‐13 and WV 2012, RCB layout, season‐long)
Halyomorpha halyse of pheromone together with MDT Brown marmorated stink bugtogether with MDT produces synergistic attraction ...
son
& s
ite
80 %
90 %
100 %
A A
ptur
es fo
r sea
s
50 %
60 %
70 %
80 %
A
A
A AA
*
*
** *
ge o
f tot
al c
ap
30 %
40 %
50 %
B
B
BB BB
BB
*
2 12 13 12 2 3
Perc
enta
g
0 %
10 %
20 %B
CD
C
D
B B
C
B
C
B
C
BC
Clt-W
V-2012
lt-MD-20
12
lt-MD-20
13
h-WV-20
12
h-MD-20
12
h-MD-20
13
Halyomorpha halyse of pheromone together with MDT Brown marmorated stink bugtogether with MDT produces synergistic attraction ...
son
& s
ite
80 %
90 %
100 %
A A#8
ptur
es fo
r sea
s
50 %
60 %
70 %
80 %
A
A
A AA
*
*
** *
ge o
f tot
al c
ap
30 %
40 %
50 %
B
B
BB BB
BB
*
2 12 13 12 2 3
Perc
enta
g
0 %
10 %
20 %B
CD
C
D
B B
C
B
C
B
C
BC
Clt-W
V-2012
lt-MD-20
12
lt-MD-20
13
h-WV-20
12
h-MD-20
12
h-MD-20
13
mprovement in captures (season‐long totals)mprovement in captures (season long totals) and Synergism (greater‐than‐additive) effectfrom use of combined pheromone plus MDT lures
mprovement in captures ^ (season‐long totals)compared to MDT alone
mprovement in captures (season long totals) and Synergism (greater‐than‐additive) effectfrom use of combined pheromone plus MDT lures
mprovement in captures ^ (season‐long totals)compared to pheromone alone
mprovement in captures (season long totals) and Synergism (greater‐than‐additive) effectfrom use of combined pheromone plus MDT lures
mprovement in captures (season‐long totals)mprovement in captures (season long totals) and Synergism (greater‐than‐additive effect)from use of combined pheromone plus MDT lures
Halyomorpha halysmbined lure is superior Brown marmorated stink bugover the entire season
for adults
90 %2012 BeltsvilleBMSB Adults
60 %
70 %
80 %
BMSB Adults
40 %
50 %
60 %
10 %
20 %
30 %
APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT0 %
Halyomorpha halysd l id Brown marmorated stink bugand also provides
superior season‐long attraction in nymphs
90 %
100 % Beltsville 2012BMSB Nymphs
attraction in nymphs
60 %
70 %
80 %
30 %
40 %
50 %
0 %
10 %
20 %
0 %APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT
Amongst nymphal stages and adults, season‐long differences are small
100 %
season long differences are smalldataset: Beltsville 2013
ife s
tage
80 %
90 %
100 %
capt
ures
in li
50 %
60 %
70 %
A B B CB
age
of to
tal c
30 %
40 %
50 %
Perc
enta
10 %
20 %
ii nymph iii nymph iv nymph v nymph Adult0 %
Amongst nymphal stages and adults, season‐long differences are small
100 %
season long differences are smalldataset: Beltsville 2013
ife s
tage
80 %
90 %
100 %
l &
capt
ures
in li
50 %
60 %
70 %
A B B CB
males &females similarlyattracted
age
of to
tal c
30 %
40 %
50 %
Perc
enta
10 %
20 %
ii nymph iii nymph iv nymph v nymph Adult0 %
mparison of captures for crude (#20) pheromone mixturersus pure isomers (SSRS + RSRS) with and without 66mg MDT
st 700
800
900 AA
Ad lt
rsus pure isomers (SSRS + RSRS) with and without 66mg MDT
27-d
ay te
s
500
600
700 Adults
ures
for 2
200
300
400
B B
C
Tota
l cap
tu
0
100
300 A A
C
NymphsT
DT DT PH PH nk
0
100
200AB B
C
y p
PH + MDT
PH + MDT
crud
e.PH
pure
.PH
blank
al.,
400500600700 a
abAug 9alys captures in pyramid ps with mixed‐isomer
0100200300400
Week
bc
c
ps with mixed‐isomer eromone lures of 0, 10, 100, and 1000mg (!),
ith 66 MDT
100150200250300350
s / Trap / W a
aab
b
Aug 16with 66mg MDT
st 2013, soybean, West Virginia
050
200250300
BMSB
adu
lts b
a
bAug 23
050
100150200
umbe
r of B
bbc
c
100150200250300N
u
aa
a
Aug 30
Control 10mg 100mg 1000mg0
50 a
Halyomorpha halysy p yBrown marmorated stink bug
distinct overwintering sites & behavior
tion on near‐natural stone monumentstone monument
attraction to outdoor lighting at a b i k b k b ildibrick bank building
Halyomorpha halysMurgantia histrionical i b Brown marmorated stink bugarlequin bug
ggregation pheromone for HQ bug “murgantiol” (Zahn et al. 2008)
tractive also to BMSB, as shown in preceding talk
ch species has pheromone with two stereoisomers; p p ;both have as most abundant, (3S,6S,7R,10S)‐10,11‐epoxy‐1‐bisabolen‐3‐ol
ut ... there are some KEY distinctions ...ut ... there are some KEY distinctions ...
Halyomorpha halysMurgantia histrionical i b Brown marmorated stink bugarlequin bug
Key distinctions:
2nd isomer is SSRR 2nd isomer is RSRS≠
plant specialist
orth American native
extreme generalist
Asian native
≠
≠
ot responsive to MDT
distinct overwintering
responsive to MDT
distinct overwintering
≠
≠distinct overwintering sites & behavior
distinct overwintering sites & behavior
≠
Halyomorpha halysMurgantia histrionical i b Brown marmorated stink bugarlequin bug
Key distinctions:
2nd isomer is SSRR 2nd isomer is RSRS≠
Murgantia histrionica: Harlequin bugplant specialist (Brassicaceae & Capparaceae)
50mini pyr trap
plant specialist (Brassicaceae & Capparaceae)(Wallingford et al. 2012)
ults
,w
eeks
40
mini-pyr.trap with plantmini-pyr.trap without plant
equi
n bu
g ad
uca
ptur
ed in
2 w
20
30
y = 2.05x; r2=.743; p=.0028
Har
leto
tal c
10y = 0.070x; r2=.572; p<.0001
mg loading of lure
0 20 40 60 80 1000
ong response to mixed isomer lure mg loading of lure
(0, 3, 10, 30, or 100mg without plant)(0 10 ith l t)
ong response to mixed‐isomer lurepecially in combination with host plant
Murgantia histrionicaHarlequin bug
Captures at trap collard plants with 4mg blends with varied isomer ratioHarlequin bug 7‐way field choice test 2‐9 July 2013
July
80
ures
2-9
J
40
60
tota
l cap
t
20
40
0purepure
SSRS SSRR
6:1 3:1 1:1 1:3 pureSSRR
pureSSRS
hallenges to understanding and application of t t id i h i l bi i tpentatomid semiochemicals – big picture
Knowledge of biology << knowledge of chemistry
Pheromone may have multiple functions depending on...
Other senses involved: visual and especially short‐range substrate‐borne vibrational
Species are polyphagous and highly mobile; need to consider wild hosts and entire [agro]ecosystemshosts and entire [agro]ecosystems
Additonal attractants: other species’ semiochemicals and also various phytochemicalsp y
Natural enemies respond to pheromones
Making pest suppression work: general challenges with managing g p pp g g g gtrap‐cropping or mass trapping
Next steps with BMSB pheromone research
Individual isomers: determine optimal ratios (howIndividual isomers: determine optimal ratios (how much increased dose compensates for off‐ratios)
Combined lures: determine optimal doses and ratioCombined lures: determine optimal doses and ratio of MDT to pheromone
Trap design including toxin‐free modelsTrap design, including toxin‐free models
Making pest suppression work: implement trap‐cropping and/or mass trapping while protectingcropping and/or mass trapping, while protecting natural enemies and other non‐targets
Thank you!Thank you!
We thank Michael Athanas, Anthony DiMeglio, and Matthew Klein (Maryland) and Johnand Matthew Klein (Maryland) and John Cullum, Sean Wiles and Torri Hancock (West Virginia) for pheromone trap field collection
h h h band sorting through the MANY bugs and experiments. Partial support for this study was from USDA, National Institute of Food andfrom USDA, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Specialty Crop Research Initiative grant #2011‐51181‐30937.
Thank you!Thank you!
We thank Michael Athanas, Anthony DiMeglio, and Matthew Klein (Maryland) and Johnand Matthew Klein (Maryland) and John Cullum, Sean Wiles and Torri Hancock (West Virginia) for pheromone trap field collection
h h h band sorting through the MANY bugs and experiments. Partial support for this study was from USDA, National Institute of Food andfrom USDA, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Specialty Crop Research Initiative grant #2011‐51181‐30937.
deck the halls!
Thank you!Thank you!
We thank Michael Athanas, Anthony DiMeglio, and Matthew Klein (Maryland) and John
What the...?
and Matthew Klein (Maryland) and John Cullum, Sean Wiles and Torri Hancock (West Virginia) for pheromone trap field collection
h h h band sorting through the MANY bugs and experiments. Partial support for this study was from USDA, National Institute of Food andfrom USDA, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Specialty Crop Research Initiative grant #2011‐51181‐30937.
deck the halls!