mcp micropitting and performance issues

12
MCP MicroPitting and Performance Issues 40µm pore 8” MCPs had some patchy discoloration ng using standard techniques at SSL made no difference to the were some features that can be identified as incomplete surfa l SEM/EDAX observations showed no composition variations, but micropitting of the glass surface and bulk. he micropitting occur often? And does it contribute to the MC ormance issues we are seeing. rformance issues we see, that have not already been explained arily relate to variations in background rate from MCP to MCP r study of MCPs was done by Anil and Jeff using SEM trying to correlate this with the INCOM batches and our MCP ormance observations.

Upload: paley

Post on 22-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

MCP MicroPitting and Performance Issues. Latest 40µm pore 8” MCPs had some patchy discoloration Cleaning using standard techniques at SSL made no difference to the stains There were some features that can be identified as incomplete surface polish - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

MCP MicroPitting and Performance Issues• Latest 40µm pore 8” MCPs had some patchy discoloration• Cleaning using standard techniques at SSL made no difference to the stains• There were some features that can be identified as incomplete surface polish• Initial SEM/EDAX observations showed no composition variations, but did

show micropitting of the glass surface and bulk.• Does the micropitting occur often? And does it contribute to the MCP

performance issues we are seeing.• The performance issues we see, that have not already been explained,

primarily relate to variations in background rate from MCP to MCP.• Further study of MCPs was done by Anil and Jeff using SEM• We are trying to correlate this with the INCOM batches and our MCP

performance observations.

Page 2: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

2

40µm Test Samples from 8” Substrate (6/11)

Page 3: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

MCP MicroPitting Observations (ANL)• SEM on a glass capillary, a multi draw and a cut substrate show no micropitting• MCP from scrap pile shows no micropitting• 40μm MCP #11874-249 Incom job # 524434 shows no micropitting• 20μm MCP #12317-114 Incom job # 523766 shows some micropitting• 20μm MCP B10320, PO# 1A-31445 IPN 300-2734-D shows no micropitting• 20μm MCP #11863-076 Incom job # 518627 shows no micropitting

• How does this relate to our test data?• We are trying to correlate this with the INCOM batches and our MCP

performance observations.• We have limited serial # traceability, stained 8” MCPs are

11874-215/216/218/219, like 11874-249? No pitting?• MCP 160 is 12317-113, so maybe like 12317-114 ---- pitting?• MCPs 161-168 are 11863-XXX, so like 11863-076 ------ no pitting?

Page 4: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

ALD 20µm Microchannel Plates#161-168

Visible light transmission for a 20 µm pore#168 ALD MCP .

20 µm pores (8° bias). New substrate batch. All from INCOM 11863, job # 518627.All show comparable visual features – so same material batch.

Surface photo for a 20 µm pore #168 ALD MCP with NiCr electrode .

Page 5: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

5

700v MCP Surface photo for a 20 µm pore #160 ALD MCP with NiCr electrode .

ALD 20µm Microchannel Plate #160, 12317-113, Has different construction

Page 6: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

6

Earlier MCPs have different visual featuresApart from triple point voids and debris - which cause hotspots, there are no clear differences in background rate compared with the newest batch of MCPs other than #164.

ALD 33mm Microchannel Plates

Page 7: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

Imaging Performance of ALD MCPs, 33mm

1 M

CP, P

hosp

hor r

eado

ut2

MCP

s, P

hoto

n co

untin

g

Early 2010 July 2011

20µm borosilicate MCP substrates, 60:1 L/d, 8 degree pore bias.~1000v applied to each MCP.

Single MCP tests in DC amplification mode show imaging and gain very similar to conventional MCPs.

MCP pairs operated in photon counting mode also show imaging and gain very similar to conventional MCPs.

Sample performance hasimproved dramatically overthe last 12 months due to process improvements.

UV 184nm illumination

Page 8: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

Gain-voltage for a 20µm, 60:1, 65% OAR Incom/Arradiance ALD MCP pair (44+40)

Arradiance ALD/Incom 20µm MCP Pair TestS000480 (#44) + S000476 (#40)

Dark image, 2000 sec, ~2.8 event cm-2

sec-1, one hotspot, one hot patch.

Page 9: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

Gain-voltage for a 20µm, 60:1, 65%OAR Incom/ALD MCP pair

Arradiance ALD/Incom 20µm MCP Pair Test

Dark image, 300 sec, ~18 event cm-2

sec-1, mostly due to low gain hotspots,~1 event cm-2 uniform background

Gain - pulse height histograms.Poor PHD due to poor gain in themultifiber edges. Needs slightly highervoltage than the 40µm 40:1 MCPs.

S000376 (#27)+ S000372 (#23)

Page 10: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

Arradiance ALD/Incom 40µm MCP Pair Test

Background image, ~1 event cm-2

sec-1, plus couple of hotspotsUV gain/PHD for pair #32/31

Page 11: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

33mm ALD-MCP #164 Background Rate

Pulse amplitude distributions for UV145nm, and for background events, There may be excess background dueto detection of ion pump events.

1000 sec background, 496 counts, at 2.5 x 106 gain, 2600v total, with 400v on anode. Background rate is 0.095 events cm-2 sec-1.

MCP back to back pair (164-163), 20µm pores, 8° bias, 60:1 L/d, achieves <0.1 events cm-2 sec-1.

Page 12: MCP  MicroPitting and Performance Issues

MCP Background Observations• Independent of Arradiance or ANL ALD processes most substrates

have high background• Older 40μm MCPs, typically 2 to 5 events cm-2 sec-1

• Older 20μm MCPs, typically 2 to 5 events cm-2 sec-1

• MCPs 161-168 (11863-XXX) no pitting? Tested #168 #167 and #164 168, 167 both have 2 – 4 events cm-2 sec-1, but #164 has 0.095 events cm-2 sec-1.

• It is not clear that pitting has anything to do with the majority of MCPs high background behavior

• Need to test more of the current MCP batch to confirm• Cant yet find any spreadsheet datum that distinguishes MCP# 164, we need to find out why it is so much better.