mccluskey final presentation

Upload: jpeterson1

Post on 30-May-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    1/19

    1

    Christina McCluskey

    SARP 2009

    Coastal Carolina University

    The EmissionComparison of Silage

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    2/19

    2

    Overview IntroductionBackground on

    silageMethodology

    Results

    ChromatogramsCalculations

    Discussion

    ConclusionsLimitations

    Future work

    Acknowledgments

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    3/19

    3

    Introduction: OzoneAccording to the American Lung

    Association:

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    4/19

    Central Valley Air Quality (CVAQ) Coalition4

    Introduction: CostsHealth: Annually, 808,000 absences

    are estimated in the Valleys schooldistrict because of AsthmaAgricultural: According to the Air

    District, ozone pollution causes asmuch as $300million of damage ayear. (90% of that is in the SanJoaquin Valley.)Dairy Farm silage piles are

    considered to be creating a large

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    5/19

    5

    DairyDairy Farm SilageFarm SilageSilage is fermented, high-moisture feedDuring the fermentation process

    Sugars are converted to acidsOxygen supply is depletedTemperature fluctuates in the finalphase, the temperature is ideallyless than 20F above ambienttemperature.

    Stored in piles on the dairy farm-Fermentation Analysisand Silage Quality

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    6/19

    6

    Silage

    Distribution

    Occurs 6 timesa dayThe pile is

    sliced and the

    face is exposed

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    7/19

    7

    Methodology: Sample

    Dry CoveredFresh/Wet

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    8/19

    8

    Methodology: Sample

    Source sampleswere collected at adairy farm.

    Samples wereanalyzed in theUniversity ofCalifornia IrvineRowland/Blake Lab,using GasChromatography

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    9/19

    9 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 15.0 16.0 17.5-100

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1,000

    1,100

    1,200

    1 - SARPSOURCE #3 [modified by Melissa Yang, 7 peaks manually assigned] BF7132 Int_Chan_5

    2 - SARPSOURCE #7 [modified by Melissa Yang, 10 peaks manually assigned] BF7677 Int_Chan_5

    3 - SARPSOURCE #9 [modified by Melissa Yang, 2 peaks manually assigned] BF6201A Int_Chan_5mV

    min

    321 1*-Propene(B)-4.569

    2*-Propane(B)-4.674

    3*-CH3Cl(B)-5.925

    4*-i-Butane(B)-6.646

    5*-acetaldehyde(B)-7.734

    6*-Methanol(B)-8.358

    7*-Ethanol(B)-9.343

    8*-i-Pentane(B)-9.832

    9*-acetone(B)-10.253

    10*-1-Pentene(B)-10.549

    11-10.808

    12-10.848

    13-10.955

    14*-11.270

    15-11.316

    16-11.502

    17-2-Methylpentane(B)-11.804

    18-11.956

    19-12.211

    20-n-Hexane(B)-12.393

    21-12.524

    22-12.600

    23-12.677

    24-12.976

    25-13.147

    26*-13.204

    27*-Benzene(B)-13.236

    28*-Cyclohexane(B)-13.380

    29*-2-Methylhexane(B)-13.483

    30*-13.518

    31*-2,3-Dimethylpentane(B)-13

    .563

    32*-3-Methylhexane(B)-13.621

    33-13.793

    34*-2,2,4-Trimethylpentane(B)-

    13.851

    35*-n-Heptane(B)-14.006

    36-14.355

    37*-2,3,4-Trimethylpentane(B)-

    14.817

    38-15.119

    39-15.278

    40-15.333

    41*-15.365

    42*-n-Octane(B)-15.409

    43-15.470

    44*-Ethylbenzene(B)-16.150

    45*-m/p-Xylene(B)-16.290

    46*-16.827

    47*-i-Propylbenzene(B)-16.850

    48*-17.066

    49*-alpha-Pinene(B)-17.098

    50*-17.141

    51*-n-Propylbenzene(B)-17.169

    52-17.192

    53*-m-Ethyltoluene(B)-17.219

    54*-p-Ethyltoluene(B)-17.244

    55*-17.270

    56*-1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene(B)-

    17.297

    57*-o-Ethyltoluene(B)-17.409

    Results: Chromatogram-FID

    Propan

    Ethan

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    10/19

    10

    Results: Chromatogram-FID

    9.128 9.200 9.250 9.300 9.350 9.400 9.450 9.500 9.550 9.600 9.650 9.700 9.763

    -11

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    115

    1 - SARPSOURCE #3 [modified by Melissa Yang, 7 peaks manually assigned] BF7132 Int_Chan_5

    2 - SARPSOURCE #7 [modified by Melissa Yang, 10 peaks manually assigned] BF7677 Int_Chan_5

    3 - SARPSOURCE #9 [modified by Melissa Yang, 2 peaks manually assigned] BF6201A Int_Chan_5mV

    min

    3 2 18*-Ethanol(B)-9.61

    2

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    11/19

    11

    Results: Mixing Ratios

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    12/19

    12

    Results: Pile Face EmissionsAssumptionsArea of wet silage exposed during

    sampling = 2.5 square feetArea of silage pile face = 850 square

    feet

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    13/19

    13

    Discussion: Propanol

    Acetyl radical then undergoes aseries of reactions that can formboth acetone and acetaldehyde.

    propanol

    acetyl

    propionaldehyde

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    14/19

    Carter, William P.L. UPDATED MAXIMUM INC14

    Discussion

    MIR- Maximum Incremental

    ReactivityOzone forming potential

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    15/19

    15

    ConclusionWet silage is the more damaging form ofsilage

    The most dominant compound in wet

    silage is propanolPropanol reacts with a hydroxyl radical in

    the atmosphere and acetaldehyde isproduced through a series ofphotochemical reactions

    Acetaldehyde is highly damaging to theatmosphere

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    16/19

    16

    Future WorkObtain more samples from the same

    dairy farm to check for consistency incompound mixing ratios

    Sample during distribution time

    Determine the duration of wet silageafter each distribution period

    Investigate correlation between propanol

    in silage and acetaldehyde surroundingsilage and dairy farms

    Sample different types of silage at the

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    17/19

    17

    AcknowledgmenNSERC

    NASA

    Dr. DarleneSlusher

    Dr. Don BlakeDr. Melissa Yang

    Dr. Sherwood

    RowlandSARP

    Dr. Derek El in

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    18/19

    18

    QuestionQuestion

  • 8/14/2019 McCluskey FINAL Presentation

    19/19

    19

    Thank you!Thank you!

    Thank you!

    Thank you!Thank you!Thank you!

    Mankind cannot live without the

    environment. However, theenvironment can certainl live