may 2009 public comments on hli summary and staff recommendations

17
May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and Staff Recommendations Nancy Leonard Tony Grover Tom Karier Image: NOAA-Fisheries

Upload: cain

Post on 29-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Image: NOAA-Fisheries. May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and Staff Recommendations. Nancy Leonard Tony Grover Tom Karier. Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership. Public Input. Who Commented?. Bonneville Power Adm. Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

May 2009 Public Comments on HLI

Summary and Staff Recommendations

Nancy Leonard Tony Grover Tom Karier

Image: NOAA-Fisheries

Page 2: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Who Commented?

1. Bonneville Power Adm.

2. Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority (CBFWA).

3. Eddie Farr.

4. Federal Caucus members.

5. ID Office of Species Conservation.

6. Kootenai Tribe of Idaho.

7. Lynn Card.

8. NOAA Fisheries.

9. Oregon Water Trust.

10. Pacific Northwest Anadromous Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP).

Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Aquatic

Monitoring Monitoring Partnership Partnership

Public InputPublic Input

Page 3: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Who Commented?

11. Pacific Northwest Utilities. Conference Committee.

12. Public Power Council.

13. Richard Whitney.

14. River Partners.

15. StreamNet.

16. The Freshwater Trust.

17. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.

18. Washington Forum on Monitoring.

19. ISAB and ISRP.

20. Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks.

Page 4: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Overall Comments on HLIs

Majority are supportive of the Council’s endeavor to develop HLIs to communicate FW Program progress.

Image: PNAMP’s HLI comment letter

Page 5: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Overall Comments on HLIs

Majority are supportive of the Council’s endeavor to develop HLIs to communicate FW Program progress.

Majority encourage better coordination of Council’s HLI with the region.

Pacific Northwest

Pacific Northwest Aquatic Aquatic Monitoring

Monitoring Partnership Partnership

Page 6: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Overall Comments on HLIs

Majority are supportive of the Council’s endeavor to develop HLIs to communicate FW Program progress.

Majority encourage better coordination of Council’s HLI with the region.

Many request clarification to facilitate evaluating proposed HLIs.

Majority suggests improvements for Council’s HLIs, consisting of modifications, deletions, and additions– Including …

Page 7: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Summary of 8 Major Suggestionsfor Indicators

1. Consider reorganizing some indicators into different categories or add additional categories / subcategories Such as. . .

IMAGE: www.freshwaterinstitute.org

Biological

Watershed Condition

IMAGE: pubs.usgs.gov

Implementation / Habitat Implementation

IMAGE: BPA & USFWS

Page 8: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Summary of 8 Major Suggestionsfor Indicators

1. Consider reorganizing some indicators into different categories or add additional categories / subcategories.

2. Implementation Indicators’ should be subdivided by habitat type and by different units (avoid combining apples and oranges).

www.nwcouncil.org

In-stream

wetlandupland

US COE

Estuary

Page 9: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Summary of 8 Major Suggestionsfor Indicators

1. Consider reorganizing some indicators into different categories or add additional categories / subcategories.

2. Implementation Indicators’ should be subdivided by habitat type and by different units (avoid combining apples and oranges).

3. Include mid Columbia salmonids and resident fish in HLI scope.

Bull Troutwww.nrmsc.usgs.govHatcheryreform.

Page 10: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Summary of 8 Major Suggestionsfor Indicators

1. Consider reorganizing some indicators into different categories or add additional categories / subcategories.

2. Implementation Indicators’ should be subdivided by habitat type and by different units (avoid combining apples and oranges).

3. Include mid Columbia salmonids and resident fish in HLI scope.

4. Salmonids’ abundance reported at population level for each Ecologically Significant Units/ Distinct Population Segments.

26 listed West Coast salmon and steelhead ESUs www.nwfsc.noaa.gov

Page 11: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Summary of 8 Major Suggestionsfor Indicators

1. Consider reorganizing some indicators into different categories or add additional categories / subcategories.

2. Implementation Indicators’ should be subdivided by habitat type and by different units (avoid combining apples and oranges).

3. Include mid Columbia salmonids and resident fish in HLI scope.

4. Salmonids’ abundance reported at population level for each Ecologically Significant Units/ Distinct Population Segments.

5. Report spawner, juvenile, and harvest counts for wild and hatchery salmonids.

Rotary screw trap - WDFWSpawning salmon - ODFW

Page 12: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

6. Harvest and fishery rate should match how they are reported by fishery managers.

Summary of 8 Major Suggestions - continued

Page 13: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

6. Harvest and fishery rate should match how they are reported by fishery managers.

7. Ocean and resident fish harvest indicators’ metrics and data availability need further consideration.

Summary of 8 Major Suggestions - continued

Page 14: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

6. Harvest and fishery rate should match how they are reported by fishery managers.

7. Ocean and resident fish harvest indicators’ metrics and data availability need further consideration.

8. Consider removing “Life Stage Survival”

indicator as not adding value.

Summary of 8 Major Suggestions - continued

www.ecy.wa.gov

Page 15: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Staff Recommendation: Phase I: Workshop to Finalize

‘Ready to go’ HLIs Timeframe:

– June 2009 / July 2009. Participants:

– Council members, entities that commented on HLIs, other interested parties.

To do: – Finalize HLIs for 6 implementation and 4 biological performance

measures (tables 1 & 2): Management questions, performance measures, indicator

name, metrics, data source, data availability/quality. Goal:

– Present for adoption during July/August Council meeting.– If possible, include these HLIs in 2010 Congressional Report.

Page 16: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations

Staff Recommendation:Phase II: Workshops for Refinement & Coordination of Other Indicators

Timeframe:– End of summer 2009 to end of spring 2010.

Participants: – Council members, entities that commented on HLIs, other

parties. To do:

– Assess priority & feasibility for remaining 9 proposed HLI topics.– For selected HLIs, develop & refine management questions,

performance measures, indicator names, metrics, and data availability.

Goal:– Dec 2009 complete fish abundance & watershed condition HLIs.– Complete other priority/selected HLIs by May 2010.– Include these HLIs in 2011 Congressional Report.

Page 17: May 2009 Public Comments on HLI Summary and  Staff Recommendations