Matt GoldnerProduct EvangelistOCLC

Next generation catalogs and discovery layers

Next generation catalogs and discovery layers

6th AMICAL

ConferenceMay 2009

Students, faculty and the library …Students, faculty and the library …

“For the past 10 years, online searching has become simpler and more effective everywhere, except library catalogs.”

University of California (System). Final Report : December 2005: Rethinking How We Provide Bibliographic Services for the University of California. [s.l.]: University of California Libraries, 2005.

Three Information Market Trends

Market Trend #1:Changing distribution modelMarket Trend #1:Changing distribution model

Market Trend #2:Changing nature of “content”

Market Trend #3:Changing user expectationsMarket Trend #3:Changing user expectations

• Customized information

• Personally programmed devices

• Collaborating at a distance

From “Future Worker 2015: Extreme Individualization,” Gartner (March 2006)

What this means to libraries

OCLC Studies over last 5 yearsOCLC Studies over last 5 years

Realities of information discoveryRealities of information discovery

93% — Agree Google provides

worthwhile information

From OCLC’s Perceptions of Libraries

and Information Resources report:

85% — agree Yahoo provides worthwhile information

78% — agree library Web sites provide worthwhile information

69% — feel libraries and search engines provide the same level of trustworthiness

33%

186%

27%

33%

10%

What we have learnedWhat we have learned

Change in use of Web services from 2005 - 2007

Starting an information searchStarting an information search

Reasons for never using the online library Web siteReasons for never using the online library Web site

Most college students know about the library Web site, but respond that other sites have better information as their reason for not using it.

How can we summarize the cause and effect of this rapidly changing information market place and its

relation to libraries?

Then: the user built their Workflow around the library

Now: the library must build its service around the user workflow

Then: resources were scarce and attention was abundant

Now: attention is scarce and resources are abundant

Who is engaging users?Who is engaging users?

Search Engines

Amazon

MySpace

Facebook

SecondLife

YouTube

Flickr

Newer Emerging Sites

Expectations in a networked worldExpectations in a networked world

•Simplicity and ease of use

•Self-service

•Immediate gratification

•Single source for one category

•Rich interactivity

•User participation, contribution, collaboration

Are we willing to change and meet these expectationsAre we willing to change and meet these expectations

One simple example:

Netflix goal: Getting movies to me

Not controlling how long I keep them

The ChallengeThe Challenge

•How do we deliver our value – collections, services and community …

•To the user

•On the network

•At the point of need?

Getting into the “flow” Getting into the “flow”

• User workflows, not products or services, should be the focal point

• Users care about the “jobs” they need to complete, not about products

• Solutions that users need will vary by task and change over time

From Outside Innovation, Patricia Seybold (2007)

http://www.worldcat.org/oclc/70778382

How do we do this?How do we do this?

•Aggregate services around users

•Discover resources, services, expertise

•Deliver needed items to users – wherever they are

•Share & Collaborate expertise, recommendations, experiences

Moving to NextGen discovery to delivery servicesMoving to NextGen discovery to delivery services

•Our desired outcome is to engage end users

•How?

•Find out who is engaging them successfully

•Learn and adopt from those successes

•Be willing to try and fail or succeed

Successful Web services leverage cooperation and add value for the user:

• Google: Advertisers matched with searchers.

• eBay: Many buyers and sellers with histories over time.

• Amazon: Thousands of stores, millions of products, served up in one Internet storefront.

Every user adds value for all users and to the platform as a whole

The system is more efficient through shared resources (improvements, feedback, data)

Web sites vs. networked servicesWeb sites vs. networked services

What can we learnWhat can we learn

•These sites are user centric

•We tend to be library centric

•Why this is important

• 15 years ago attention was abundant and resources where scarce

• Now resources are abundant and attention is scarce

Engaging today’s information consumerEngaging today’s information consumer

•Means learning from those outside the library space and adopting new practices or we will be isolated and obsolete

•Means starting with the user and building library services that meet their expectations

• Getting into their workflow

• Showing them we add value

Exercise #1 – Learning from successor

Whose OPAC is it?

Exercise #1 – Learning from successor

Whose OPAC is it?

Comparing our OPAC to other discovery interfacesComparing our OPAC to other discovery interfaces

http://amazon.com

http://books.google.com

Exercise #2 – Survey Says?Exercise #2 – Survey Says?

Survey on data quality enhancementsSurvey on data quality enhancements

1. More cover art

2. More tables of contents

3. Links to online content

4. More summaries

5. Merge/remove duplicate records

6. Add more formats

7. Add more records for non-English materials

8. Add excerpts to records

Survey Says . . .Survey Says . . .

Students / Public

1.More links to online content (1st)

2.More tables of contents (3rd)

3.More summaries (4th)

4.Add excerpts to records (7th)

5.Merge/remove duplicate records (8th)

6.More records for non-English (10th)

7.More cover art (11th)

8.Add more formats (18th)

Librarians

1.Merge/remove duplicate records (1st)

2.More tables of contents (2nd)

3.More summaries (3rd)

4.More cover art (7th)

5.Add more formats (13th)

6.More records for non-English (14th)

7.More links to online content (15th)

8.Add excerpts to records (17th)

Other important itemsOther important items

Students / Public

High

1.More subject information

2.More information in details tab

3.More author information

Low

1.Reader and editorial reviews

2.Citation information

3.Recommendations

4.Accuracy of information (name, subjects)

5.Ratings

Librarians

High

1.Fix typos

2.Upgrade brief records

3.Fix MARC coding errors

Low

1.More records for non-English

2.More links to online content

3.Add excerpts to records

4.Greater exposure of holdings on the Web

High level conclusionsHigh level conclusions

1. Librarians use bibliographic data to find what they want and demand accuracy of that data

2. Users use evaluative data such as summaries, excerpts and the actual full text to find what is useful

What is a user doing?What is a user doing?

Either

Looking for a known item

Or

Looking for something that will be useful for the task at hand

Really asking two questions:

Is this useful?

How do I get it?

Current solutions offered for next gen discovery to

delivery

Current solutions offered for next gen discovery to

delivery

Three types of solutionsThree types of solutions

1. Open Source software

2. Distributed software from a commercial supplier

3. Software as a Service

4. (There is a fourth if you have lots of money, Endeca)

Open Source softwareOpen Source software

• Is a business model for the creation, distribution and

maintenance of an application

• Has potential savings in start up costs not paid to a service provider

• Industry growing to help with implementation, support and enhancements for some open source solutions

• Requires in house IT expertise and possibly programming expertise

• Usually allows high degree of local customization and with a programmer can enhance the software in house and share with community

• Most widely known in North America is VuFind created at Villanova University

Distributed software from a commercial supplierDistributed software from a commercial supplier

• Most common business model for library

applications

• Up front license fee and implementation fee with annual maintenance fees

• Need local IT support unless library pays service provider to host the software for them

• Hosting is not the same as Software as a Service

• Usually allows a high degree of local customization

• Most prevalent in North America and Europe are AquaBrowser, Primo and Encore with Summon being a new comer

Software as a ServiceSoftware as a Service

• Single instance of software accessed via Web Browser

• Site configures their “instance”

• Normally has no license fee but has an annual subscription fee and can have implementation fee in first year

• Loss of varying amounts of control over customization of the application

• Gain in fast delivery of new features

• Only one at this time (I am aware of), WorldCat Local

• Some other service providers are moving towards larger sharing of data between instances of their software

Some sites to trySome sites to try

VuFind:

http://library.villanova.edu/Find

http://catalogue.nla.gov.au/

Primo:

http://www.kb.dk/en/

http://www.library.vanderbilt.edu/ (Discover Library box)

WorldCat Local:

http://lib.washington.edu

http://www.macalester.edu/library/

““It is not the It is not the

strongest of the strongest of the

species that species that

survives, nor the survives, nor the

most intelligent most intelligent

that survives. that survives.

It is the one that It is the one that

is the most is the most

adaptable to adaptable to

change.”change.”——Charles DarwinCharles Darwin