marvell complaint

58
PI-2144258 v1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, Plaintiff, v. MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., Canon s Court 22 Victoria Street Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda, and MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 5488 Marvell Lane Santa Clara, CA 95054. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Carnegie Mellon University, by its undersigned counsel, K&L Gates LLP, files this Complaint against the Defendants Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. and Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively Marvell or Defendant ). NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§ 1, et seq., from the Defendant s direct infringement and indirect infringement of United States Patent No. 6,201,839 B1 ( the 839 patent ) and United States Patent No. 6,438,180 B1 ( the 180 patent ) (collectively, the Patents ). Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 1 of 6 Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1 Filed 03/06/09 Page 1 of 6

Upload: idg-news-service

Post on 28-Apr-2015

116 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Marvell Complaint

PI-2144258 v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213,

Plaintiff, v.

MARVELL TECHNOLOGY GROUP, LTD., Canon s Court 22 Victoria Street Hamilton HM 12, Bermuda,

and

MARVELL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC., 5488 Marvell Lane Santa Clara, CA 95054.

Defendants.

) )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

) ) )

Civil Action No.

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

Plaintiff Carnegie Mellon University, by its undersigned counsel, K&L Gates

LLP, files this Complaint against the Defendants Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. and Marvell

Semiconductor, Inc. (collectively Marvell or Defendant ).

NATURE OF THE ACTION

1. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. §§

1, et seq., from the Defendant s direct infringement and indirect infringement of United States

Patent No. 6,201,839 B1 ( the 839 patent ) and United States Patent No. 6,438,180 B1 ( the

180 patent )

(collectively, the Patents ).

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 1 of 6Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1 Filed 03/06/09 Page 1 of 6

Page 2: Marvell Complaint

- 2 -

PARTIES

2. Plaintiff Carnegie Mellon University ( CMU ) is a Pennsylvania not-for-

profit corporation with its principal place of business at 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA

15213.

3. CMU is a global research university of more than 10,000 students, 70,000

alumni, and 4,000 faculty and staff.

4. CMU has been recognized for its world-class arts and technology

programs, collaboration across disciplines, and innovation leadership in education.

5. CMU is consistently one of the top-ranked universities in the United

States according to the U.S. News & World Report s Best Colleges rankings.

6. Defendant Marvell Technology Group, Ltd. ( MTGL ) is a Bermuda

corporation with a place of business listed at Canon s Court, 22 Victoria Street, Hamilton HM

12, Bermuda. Notwithstanding the foregoing, MTGL s headquarters is in Santa Clara,

California, and through its officers, employees, agents and subsidiaries, transacts business

throughout the United States, including this District.

7. Defendant Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. ( MSI ) is a California

corporation with its principal place of business at 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA 95054.

According to public filings with the Securities Exchange Commission ( SEC ), MSI is a wholly

owned subsidiary of MTGL. MSI specializes in the design, development, sale, and marketing of

high performance, mixed signal and digital integrated circuits aimed at the high speed computer,

storage, communications, and multimedia markets. In addition, MSI designs and develops

products for a number of MTGL s other subsidiaries, specifically including, Marvell

International, Ltd. and Marvell Asia Pte Ltd.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

8. This is an action for patent infringement arising under the patent laws of

the United States 35 U.S.C. § 271.

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 2 of 6Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1 Filed 03/06/09 Page 2 of 6

Page 3: Marvell Complaint

- 3 -

9. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331,

1332 and 1338(a).

10. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendant because, among

other things, the Defendant, either directly or through its respective agents, has minimum

contacts with this forum as a result of business regularly conducted within the Commonwealth of

Pennsylvania and within the Western District of Pennsylvania ( this District ), which business

activities introduce products and/or components of products into the stream of commerce that

infringe the Patents.

11. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b)-(c)

because the Defendant resides in this judicial district and, separately, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

1400(b) because the Defendant has committed acts of infringement in this judicial district.

COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF THE 839 PATENT

12. CMU realleges and incorporates herein paragraphs 1-11 above as if fully

set forth herein.

13. On March 13, 2001, the United States Patent and Trademark Office

( USPTO ) issued the 839 patent, entitled Method and Apparatus for Correlation-Sensitive

Adaptive Sequence Detection, with Aleksandar Kavcic and José M. F. Moura named as

inventors. A true and correct copy of the 839 patent is provided at Exhibit A.

14 CMU is the owner of the 839 patent by assignment.

15. Marvell is now and/or has been directly, indirectly, contributorily, and/or

by inducement infringing the 839 patent, literally and/or under the doctrine of equivalents, as

proscribed by 35 U.S.C. § 271, et seq., by, without permission or authority from CMU,

importing into the United States, and selling, offering to sell, making, using, contributing to

others use and sale of, and/or inducing others to use and sell within the United States, including

this District, products and/or components of products and/or services that infringe at least one

claim of the 839 patent, including but not limited to read-channel integrated circuit devices, or

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 3 of 6Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1 Filed 03/06/09 Page 3 of 6

Page 4: Marvell Complaint

- 4 -

products that incorporate read-channel integrated circuit devices, including but not limited to

Marvell s 88C3000, 88C3100, 88C4200, 88C4300, 88C5500, 88C5520, 88C7500, 88C7500M,

and 88i5520 series of products and/or any additional Marvell hardware and/or software

components that incorporate or implement noise predictive detection including, but not limited

to, pattern dependent noise prediction, signal dependent noise prediction, data dependent noise

prediction, and/or branch label noise prediction, for detecting data stored on a hard-disk drive.

16. Marvell is not, and has not been at any time, licensed under the 839

patent.

17. Upon information and belief, Marvell s foregoing acts of infringement

have been and continue to be willful and deliberate.

18. CMU has been damaged by the foregoing acts of infringement of its

patents by the Defendant and will continue to be damaged by such infringement unless enjoined

by this Court.

COUNT II - INFRINGEMENT OF THE 180 PATENT

19. CMU realleges and incorporates herein paragraphs 1-11 above as if fully

set forth herein.

20. On August 20, 2002, the USPTO issued the 180 patent, entitled Soft and

Hard Sequence Detection in ISI Memory Channels, with Aleksandar Kavcic and José M. F.

Moura named as inventors. A true and correct copy of the 180 patent is provided at Exhibit B.

21. CMU is the owner of the 180 patent by assignment.

22. Upon information and belief, Marvell is now and/or has been directly,

indirectly, contributorily, and/or by inducement infringing the 180 patent, literally and/or under

the doctrine of equivalents, as proscribed by 35 U.S.C. § 271, et seq., by, without permission or

authority from CMU, importing into the United States, and selling, offering to sell, making,

using, contributing to others use and sale of, and/or inducing others to use and sell within the

United States, including this District, products and/or components of products and/or services

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 4 of 6Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1 Filed 03/06/09 Page 4 of 6

Page 5: Marvell Complaint

- 5 -

that infringe at least one claim of the 180 patent, including but not limited to read-channel

integrated circuit devices, or products that incorporate read-channel integrated circuit devices,

including but not limited to Marvell s 88C3000, 88C3100, 88C4200, 88C4300, 88C5500,

88C5520, 88C7500, 88C7500M, and 88i5520 series of products and/or any additional Marvell

hardware and/or software components that incorporate or implement noise predictive detection

including, but not limited to, pattern dependent noise prediction, signal dependent noise

prediction, data dependent noise prediction, and/or branch label noise prediction, for detecting

data stored on a hard-disk drive.

23. Marvell is not, and has not been at any time, licensed under the 180

patent.

24. Upon information and belief, Marvell s foregoing acts of infringement

have been and continue to be willful and deliberate.

25. CMU has been damaged by the foregoing acts of infringement of its

patents by the Defendant and will continue to be damaged by such infringement unless enjoined

by this Court.

RELIEF REQUESTED

Wherefore, CMU respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment against

Marvell as follows:

A. That the 839 and 180 patents have been infringed by Marvell;

B. That infringement of the 839 and 180 patents by Marvell has been

willful;

C. A preliminary and permanent injunction against further infringement of

the 839 and 180 patents by Marvell;

D. An award of damages sufficient to compensate CMU for the patent

infringement that has occurred, together with pre-judgment interest and costs;

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 5 of 6Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1 Filed 03/06/09 Page 5 of 6

Page 6: Marvell Complaint

- 6 -

E. An award of all other damages permitted by 35 U.S.C. § 284, including

increased damages up to three times the amount of compensatory damages found;

F. That this in an exceptional case and an award to CMU of its costs and

reasonable attorneys fees incurred in this action as provided by 35 U.S.C. § 285; and

G. Such other relief that this Court deems just and proper.

JURY DEMAND

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38(b), CMU hereby demands a trial

by jury on all issues triable of right by a jury

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: March 6, 2009 _s/Patrick J. McElhinny____________ Patrick J. McElhinny PA. Id. No. 53510 [email protected]

K&L Gates LLP Henry W. Oliver Building 535 Smithfield Street Pittsburgh, PA 15222 Phone: 412.355.6500 Fax: 412.355.6501

Attorney for Plaintiff, Carnegie Mellon University

Of Counsel:

Douglas B. Greenswag [email protected] David T. McDonald [email protected] K&L Gates LLP 925 Fourth Avenue Suite 2900, Seattle, WA 98104-1158 Phone: 206.623.7580 Fax: 206.623.7022

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 6 of 6Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1 Filed 03/06/09 Page 6 of 6

Page 7: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-2 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 1 of 2Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-1 Filed 03/06/09 Page 1 of 2

Page 8: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-2 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 2 of 2Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-1 Filed 03/06/09 Page 2 of 2

Page 9: Marvell Complaint

EXHIBIT A

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 1 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 1 of 22

Page 10: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 2 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 2 of 22

Page 11: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 3 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 3 of 22

Page 12: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 4 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 4 of 22

Page 13: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 5 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 5 of 22

Page 14: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 6 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 6 of 22

Page 15: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 7 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 7 of 22

Page 16: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 8 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 8 of 22

Page 17: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 9 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 9 of 22

Page 18: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 10 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 10 of 22

Page 19: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 11 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 11 of 22

Page 20: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 12 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 12 of 22

Page 21: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 13 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 13 of 22

Page 22: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 14 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 14 of 22

Page 23: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 15 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 15 of 22

Page 24: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 16 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 16 of 22

Page 25: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 17 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 17 of 22

Page 26: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 18 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 18 of 22

Page 27: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 19 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 19 of 22

Page 28: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 20 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 20 of 22

Page 29: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 21 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 21 of 22

Page 30: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-5 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 22 of 22Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-2 Filed 03/06/09 Page 22 of 22

Page 31: Marvell Complaint

EXHIBIT B

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 1 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 1 of 24

Page 32: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 2 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 2 of 24

Page 33: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 3 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 3 of 24

Page 34: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 4 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 4 of 24

Page 35: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 5 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 5 of 24

Page 36: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 6 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 6 of 24

Page 37: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 7 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 7 of 24

Page 38: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 8 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 8 of 24

Page 39: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 9 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 9 of 24

Page 40: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 10 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 10 of 24

Page 41: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 11 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 11 of 24

Page 42: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 12 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 12 of 24

Page 43: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 13 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 13 of 24

Page 44: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 14 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 14 of 24

Page 45: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 15 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 15 of 24

Page 46: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 16 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 16 of 24

Page 47: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 17 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 17 of 24

Page 48: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 18 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 18 of 24

Page 49: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 19 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 19 of 24

Page 50: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 20 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 20 of 24

Page 51: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 21 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 21 of 24

Page 52: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 22 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 22 of 24

Page 53: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 23 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 23 of 24

Page 54: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-6 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 24 of 24Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-3 Filed 03/06/09 Page 24 of 24

Page 55: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-3 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 1 of 2Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-4 Filed 03/06/09 Page 1 of 2

Page 56: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-3 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 2 of 2Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-4 Filed 03/06/09 Page 2 of 2

Page 57: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-4 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 1 of 2Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-5 Filed 03/06/09 Page 1 of 2

Page 58: Marvell Complaint

Case 2:05-mc-02025 Document 291-4 Filed 03/06/2009 Page 2 of 2Case 2:09-cv-00290-NBF Document 1-5 Filed 03/06/09 Page 2 of 2