market scan & sustainability working group or health care quality corporation board discussion...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Market Scan & SustainabilityWorking Group
OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion
September 17, 2008
![Page 2: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Objectives for Today
• Review Inputs: Recap of Three Perspectives
– Business Model Insights from Case Studies – Results of Market Scan– Results of Stakeholder Priority Survey
• Present Committee Recommendations
– Program recommendations, based on inputs– Staff evaluation of effort (weighting)
• Board Action: Discuss & Finalize Recommendations
![Page 3: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Sustainability Plan Criteria Advances the Mission: Leads to real solutions for improving
health care quality through better information and increased community-wide collaboration
Acknowledges and responds to compelling circumstances
Leverages the unique value of the Quality Corporation
Delivers tangible value to stakeholders within a timeframe that will keep their attention
Meets the expectations of funders
Attracts the attention of potential new funders
Builds a sustainable position for the Quality Corporation mission and organization
![Page 4: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Part I: Business Model InsightsLinking Value with Funding
Clinical Quality Improvements
Public Reporting
Clinical QI; training program
Performance Measurement
4
$0.0 $1.0 $2.0 $3.0 $4.0 $5.0 $6.0 $7.0
CCHRI: Govt/CMS
PRHI: Foundations
Puget Sound:Purchasers
CQC: Health Plans
Total Funding & Largest Contributor Group
Largest Contributor Others
![Page 5: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
How are Collaboratives Funded?Consolidated View of Six Organizations Studied
Government26%
Health Plans25%
Foundations22%
Purchasers10%
Providers8%
Other5%
Pharma4%
![Page 6: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Puget Sound Health Alliance
6
Sources of Funds Uses of Funds
![Page 7: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
California Quality Collaborative
7
Sources of Funds Uses of Funds
![Page 8: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
California Cooperative Healthcare Reporting Initiative
8
Sources of Funds Uses of Funds
![Page 9: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative
9
Sources of Funds Uses of Funds
![Page 10: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Part II: Market ScanSummary Points
• Quality Corporation Niche: Recognition and respect for multi-stakeholder approach; not aware of “competitors” having that qualification
• Hoping that Quality Corporation doesn’t think “too small”
• Several cautions against taking on too much
• Frequent perception that “nobody” leading or innovating across stakeholder groups in key areas; innovations may be viewed as internally focused
• Increasing interest in access, value, and affordability, out of necessity
• ‘Good ideas have come out of Oregon, but collaborative execution has been a challenge.’
![Page 11: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Market Scan HighlightsState Health Reform
• Considerable energy around reform recommendations; expecting some key components to move forward
• Expecting nonprofits and public-private partnerships to have a significant role in executing on those recommendations
• Expect state to take “partner/buy” vs. “design/build” approach
• Differing opinions about the Quality Institute
• Suggested additional promotion of Quality Corporation to position for future opportunities
![Page 12: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Part III: Survey ResultsFeedback on Current Programs
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Number of Raters
Assist Clinics in Using Q-Corp Quality Information (7)
Facilitate Hospital Partnership in National QI (6)
Facilitate Partnership to Report on Disparities (5)
Shaping of Health Policy - Adv isory Role (4)
Publish Quality Information - Trusted Link (3)
Prov ide Tools to Partners to Help Consumers Understand Quality (2)
Aggregate Data for Primary Care (1)
Rated as High or Moderate
Rated as High Value
![Page 13: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Highest Value Current Programs by Type of Stakeholder
>> Caution: Number of respondents in each category is small <<
▲ = Highest rating within that stakeholder group (may be tied)
x = Noted by at least one respondent as “low/no value”
Provi
ders
(8)
Health
Pla
ns (4
)
Purchas
ers
(3)
Health
Ser
vice
s (4
)
Consum
er A
dvoca
tes
(4)
Public P
olicy
(3)
All Oth
ers
(4)
1 Aggregate Data for Primary Care ▲x ▲ ▲ ▲
2Provide Tools to Partners to Help Consumers Understand Quality
x x ▲ ▲ ▲
3 Publish Quality Information - Trusted Link x
4 Shaping of Health Policy (Advisory Role) x x ▲
5 Facilitate Partnership to Report on Disparities x x x x ▲ ▲
6 Facilitate Hospital Partnership in National QI x x x
7Assist Clinics in Using Q-Corp Quality Information
x x x x
![Page 14: Market Scan & Sustainability Working Group OR Health Care Quality Corporation Board Discussion September 17, 2008](https://reader033.vdocuments.mx/reader033/viewer/2022042822/56649edf5503460f94befb2e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Survey ResultsValue of Future Programs
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Ratings
Monitor Quality of Care to Publicly Advocate (9)
Report on Patient Experience (8)
Increase Provider Use and Access to EMRs (7)
Consumer Incentives (6)
Interoperability of Electronic Health Records (5)
Report on Specialty Care (4)
Provider Incentives (3)
Report on Efficiency and Value (2)
Clinical Quality Improvement - ICSI model (1)
Total Ratings
Rated #1