marginal costing vs absorption costing - acca - f5

7

Click here to load reader

Upload: jessy-chong

Post on 18-Aug-2015

108 views

Category:

Education


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing - ACCA - F5

Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing

Prepared by: Jessy Chong

Page 2: Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing - ACCA - F5

Differences:Marginal Costing Absorption CostingCost Classification

•Based on cost behaviour• Variable Costs (VPC, VNPC)• Fixed Costs (FPC, FNPC)

• Stock Valuation• Prime Costs + VPOH

• Profit Reporting• Profit affected if sales volume

change

Cost Classification

•Based on cost function• Production Costs (VPC + FPC

absorbed)• Non-Production Costs (VNPC, FNPC)

• Stock Valuation• Prime Costs + VPOH + FPOH

absorbed• Profit Reporting• Profit affected by production

volume

Page 3: Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing - ACCA - F5

Marginal CostingAdvantages DisadvantagesNo allocation & apportionment.

(No need to choose the basis of apportionment)

No over/under absorbed. Write off FC in the income statement.

Product cost = VPC, more realistic. No distortion

Profits varies depend to the sales volumes, not production volume.

Helpful in short term decision esp limiting factor. Identify the relevant costs.

Not conform of IAS 2 Stock valuation. Matching concept

Difficult to split the VC & FCNot recover full cost in the

production. May set wrong SPOnly can use for S/T decision.

For L/T still have to consider full costing principle.

Page 4: Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing - ACCA - F5

Absorption CostingAdvantages DisadvantagesComply with IAS2 Stock

valuation. Cover all relevant production cost.

Set competitive and realistic SPOver/Under absorption can

identify inefficient utilisation of production resources

Emphasis all costs to be recover in the L/T DM.

Cost charge fairly to the product

Confusion in basis of apportionment. Argument of the basis used.

Have to adjust the over/under absorbed at the year end. Cannot absorbed correctly.

Profits are affected by the production volumes. Can be distorted.

Page 5: Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing - ACCA - F5

Idle Time Idle FacilitiesIs not in the expectation.No budget plan for itIf happen, then cost increasedProfit is reducedExample: Machine break-down,

raw materials run out, power failure

Surplus capacityIs expected and within the

budget or planNo effect on cost and profitExample: spare capacity of

machinery or building

Page 6: Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing - ACCA - F5

Pg 30Q1 Q2Define what is direct & indirect

wages.Determine the function of

rework dept whether it is a production cost centre or service cost centre.

Conclusion of this case

Identify the options to utilise the Idle Facilities.

Example: Sell, rent, increase the sales volume..etc

How it can helps to improve the profitability.

Page 7: Marginal Costing vs Absorption Costing - ACCA - F5

Pg 31(a) Advantages &

Disadvantages of AC Ps: 7 marks in totals,

therefore give 7 points

(b) Factors to consider when you choose the basis of apportionment.

- The services in between the service cost centres.

- The nature of the service cost centres.

- The nature of the service OH costs.- The data collected & recorded –

reputable & reliable. Can produce realistic apportionment.

- The cost, benefit and time involved – worthiness