mar 20170012: telephone lake east - alberta energy · invoice total description environmentalist $...

Alberta Mineral Assessment Reporting System

MAR 20170012: TELEPHONE LAKE EAST A report on Diamonds exploration on the Telephone Lake East property near Fort Mackay. Received date: August 31, 2017 Public release date: August 17, 2018 DISCLAIMER By accessing and using the Alberta Energy website to download or otherwise obtain a scanned mineral assessment report, you (“User”) agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions: a) Each scanned mineral assessment report that is downloaded or otherwise obtained from Alberta

Energy is provided “AS IS”, with no warranties or representations of any kind whatsoever from Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, as represented by the Minister of Energy (“Minister”), expressed or implied, including, but not limited to, no warranties or other representations from the Minister, regarding the content, accuracy, reliability, use or results from the use of or the integrity, completeness, quality or legibility of each such scanned mineral assessment report;

b) To the fullest extent permitted by applicable laws, the Minister hereby expressly disclaims, and is released from, liability and responsibility for all warranties and conditions, expressed or implied, in relation to each scanned mineral assessment report shown or displayed on the Alberta Energy website including but not limited to warranties as to the satisfactory quality of or the fitness of the scanned mineral assessment report for a particular purpose and warranties as to the non-infringement or other non-violation of the proprietary rights held by any third party in respect of the scanned mineral assessment report;

c) To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, the Minister, and the Minister’s employees and agents, exclude and disclaim liability to the User for losses and damages of whatsoever nature and howsoever arising including, without limitation, any direct, indirect, special, consequential, punitive or incidental damages, loss of use, loss of data, loss caused by a virus, loss of income or profit, claims of third parties, even if Alberta Energy have been advised of the possibility of such damages or losses, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Alberta Energy website, including the accessing or downloading of the scanned mineral assessment report and the use for any purpose of the scanned mineral assessment report so downloaded or retrieved.

d) User agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Minister, and the Minister’s employees and agents against and from any and all third party claims, losses, liabilities, demands, actions or proceedings related to the downloading, distribution, transmissions, storage, redistribution, reproduction or exploitation of each scanned mineral assessment report obtained by the User from Alberta Energy.

•

....._ I f )ioc

I ~

Wildrose Diamex Corp.

2017 Exploration Drilling for the Telephone Lake East Metallic and Industrial Minerals Permit,

NE Alberta

PART B

Permits:

Location

Permit Number Ha Twp RGE

W4

093 9313080462 7808 ,,.

94-1

093 9315120206 9216 ,,.

93-1

093 9315120207 9216 ,,.

93-2

093 9317010208 7712 ,,

93-3

Geographic Coordinates: 57 ° 02 N to 57 ° 13 N

110°00Wto 110° 30W

NTS Sheet 74 EOl

Owner: Wildrose Diamex Corp. 1250, 639 5th Ave SW, Calgary, AB T2P OM9

Operator: Land Quest Services Ltd. 3359 27th Street NE Calgary, AB Tl Y SE4

Report submitted by: Nigel Hopkins, P. Geoph.

August 30, 2017

~A£.. dt>\7 oo,~ AUG 3 1 2017

•

"- I ') I _$1)( '

~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Summary Cost Breakdown ........................... .................................... 3 2. Introduction ... .. .................................. ............................................. .... 4 3. Summary .......................................................................................... ... 4 4. Geographic Setting and Access ................................. ...................... 4 5. Location NTS Map ............ ................................................ ................. 5 6. Location Map with Grouped Leases ................................. .............. 6 7. Work Performed ... ... ........................ ........................... ... ...... ...... ........ 7 8. Results ... ........................... .................................................................. 7 9. APEX Geoscience: Stratigraphic Logs Cores 1&2 ........................ 8 10. APEX Geoscience: Summary of Basement Core Analysis, Core 2 11 11. Bureau Veritas Mineral laboratory lab Results, Core 2 ......... .... 20 12. Alberta Caribou Protection Plan outline ...................................... 28 13. Conclusions ... .............................. ................................................... ... 31 14. Statement of Qualifications ..................... ....................................... 32

2

""' ~ I) ( "

Summary Cost Breakdown Ql 2017 Field Work

APPROVALS Invoice TOTAL Description

Environmentalist $ 2,772.00 Environmentalist on-site evaluation, base line

Environmentalist $ 1,653.75 Environmentalist scouting, report writing

First Nation $ 1,260.00 First Nation consultation

Permit Company $ 3,310.13 Caribou Plan work (Richarson Sub Unit)

Permit Company $ 543.38 Caribou Plan work (Richarson Sub Unit)

Trucking $ 3,633.82 drill equipment trucking

Trucking $ 149.02 drill equipment trucking

Permit Approvals $ 4,928.84 Approvals

sub TOTAL $ 18,250.94

Expenses

Field Expenses $ 3,978.50 expenses

TOTALS $ 22,229.44

CAMP COSTS

Fuel I $ 38,992.00 diesel for camp and equipment

Fuel I $ 844.00 initial camp propoane set up

Contractor $ 17,591.00 grader work, drill water tank rental

Camp Service $ 163,098.00 camp, camp manager, 37 days

I $ 220,525.00

DRIWNG COSTS

Drilling I $ 173,250.00 drill, 4 man crew, supervisor, 2 holes drilled

Trucking I $ 9,954.00 drill mob de-mob (trucking)

Contractor $ 15,610.00 dozer for drill, water truck for drill mud system

I $ 198,814.00

GEOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

Geological $ 15,448.00 core analysis and logging, field geologist

Analysis $ 313.00 high graded sample testing

Trucking $ 1,000.00 core hot-shot site to Edmonton

$ 16,761.00

RECLAMATION

Contractor I $ 4,000.00 field work, 2 men, vehicle, June 25-28, 2017

I I PROGRAM TOTAL COST $ 462,329.44

10% Administration Charge $ 46,232.94

PROGRAM with 10".A, Administration cost s 508,562.38

3

-INTRODUCTION

This report documents the drill results of a two (2) well diamond drilling program conducted late February and early March, 2017, on Metallic and Industrial Minerals (MIM) Permit number 9313080462 (Twp 94 Rge 1 w4M). The drilling of these two targets was the result of previous geophysical exploration work in the area conducted by Wildrose Diam ex in previous years. A total of seven (7) targets were identified by the previous work but only two were tested due to time constraints on the activities.

SUMMARY

The two (2) diamond core wells were positioned to test two independent circular intrusive features for the presence of diamond indicator minerals as the features were believed to be kimberlites. Core results proved that the features were not kimberlites but intrusive granitic material.

GEOGRAPHIC SETTING AND ACCESS

The Wildrose Diam ex permits were in an inaccessible area immediately west of the Saskatchewan border and outside the bounds of the significant oilsands activities in the area. In order to limit any environmental disturbances and particularly to avoid the Richardson Caribou Sub Unit lands, the corporate decision was made to use an existing road access through Saskatchewan. To facilitate this decision, Caribou Protection Plans were written and submitted to both the Alberta and Saskatchewan Environment divisions of the respective governments. Access was ultimately granted by both divisions. The Cover page and Table of Contents page have been included in this

report. The closest center by existing road from the drill site was La Loche, Saskatchewan, approximately 80km east on existing oilsands road on the Saskatchewan side followed by a 133 km drive south on a gravel road Highway 955. The Highway 955 is the Cluff Lake access now seeing a renewed use for new uranium discoveries in the Patterson Lake area. The remote but accessible nature of the property allowed the company to place a complete tent camp for the drillers with a cook shack on site. Fuel, food and necessities were all trucked into the

site with no new road cutting required.

~ I )):l)C I ,. ..,

4

I

Location Map NTS: 074 E 01

074E01 - NO TITLE - Topographic Map

-

.. '\ •<::• .

. Rge 3w4,

•

...... +··

\ :) \ \

.. i

. \. l .. ~---'- i'

• I ~

.. __ ./-·

.. ___ _ 4 ,

--l

• ,-I 1

. ~

' •/

~ --. - :- -------=--

- - '

Rg~- _ _._.,.

fw4

Diamond Drill Core Site

* Drilling Camp Location

Well Coordinates;

The co-ordinates for the two drilled wells are:

... El···

,k core l: N57 degrMS, 09 minutes, 10.0 sec. W110 degrHs 01 minutes, 31.8 sec.

* Core 2 : N57 de1rHs, 10 minutes, 10.0 sec. W110 de1rees, 01 minutes, 01.0 sec.

.. . ==-- ::. =--~ .. ~~. _,__, ~~

.. = t::.::..

5

10

-

Map of Four (4) Permits Intended to be Grouped Continued under Assessment Report

Rge 1W4

36

36 31 32 ~ ~ n " ~ » " --1-- ...____,_ _ _.. 4-0~..._...4-----4-

Telephone Lake East

Well Coordinates:

25 JO 29 ,a 27 DOE

~ tore 1: N57 degrees, 09 minutes, 10.0 see. WU0 degrffs 01 minutes, 31.8 sec.

~ Core 2: N57 desrHs, 10 mlnut•s, 10.0 Mtc. W110 degrHs, 01 minutes, 01.0 sac.

6

e,RK PERFORMED

Drilling was conducted by Lone Peak Drilling expedited out of Smithers, BC, with two crews. Two core sizes were drilled, HQ then NQ with a total of 194.3 meters of core recovered from both. In this area the overburden is unconsolidated glacial sands with thin lenses of shales; a mud system

was successfully employed to drill and case the overburden first, then snub in with the coring tools. At the base of the glacial sands is the Lower Cretaceous McMurray formation that may contain bitumen within the sand matrix. As this material was found to be relatively unconsolidated drilling with the mud system continued through this material until the Devonian carbonates were intersected. Casing was landed at the top of the Devonian for both tests. Initial core study was done at site by APEX Geoscience then detailed work on the core and testing arrangements were carried out in the APEX Edmonton offices. Rig placement was done using a high track 06 cat with the drill broken down into component parts for moving and t ransporting. Weather for this area was initially warm, +SC, but plunged to -40C shortly after the second well was spud.

KEY DATES FOR THE DRILLING OPERATIONS

Kev Oates WIidrose Ola~x Orillln1 Proeram Q12~7 - -FebtualV 8 February 22 March 1 March3 March 7 March 17

Camp Camp contructlon

camp Removed ,_,,ns

Core l mud TO

Core2 SN .. TO

RESULTS

During the drilling operations APEX provided experienced geological support for the real time evaluation of the drill results. It was determined that a thick Devonian/Granite Wash (Contact Rapids) section was present at the test sites followed by an intrusive Precambrian event that was not kimberlite material. Core 1 did not intercept Precambrian; Core 2 did. Eight (8) samples from Core 2 were chosen by APEX for detailed analysis of potential metallic mineralization at Bureau Veritas, Vancouver. Both wells encountered essentially identical geological results but were testing the largest features on the mineral lease. Other different features were not able to be drilled. The table below summarizes the drilling results:

~

( ' I )XIK._

-.,. __ , ......... u

WIidrose Olamex Corp Carrot Patch Well Results Table Source: APEX Geoscience geological core review April, 2017

Total Core core Depth K .. ltlver dolostone CoreWtBI ·- Start

TDDeptl! lsooach

1 73.Sm 180m 253.Sm 59.2m 2 120.8 174m 294.8m Sl.6m

Contact ~Ids La Loche PrvC lsopach

,~acJi lso-h

12.0m 2.3m TO in La Loche

6.9m 12.Sm 49.8

7

_, ., ... , ....... .

APEX Geosclence Stratigraphic Logs Core 1 & Z

8

I I

.; > ii: il' :.::

c:: (II

·c 0 > ~

!

WIidrose Olamex Corp. OOH01 SE-13..()94-41 --' 558952E 63™07N (Z12, NA083)

0.le Logged April 8. 2017 Loggodt,yDCot:ettll Ground 534.00 m KB 534 00 m Aematb. Carrot Patch Project

Cored Interval 180.00-25 3.S0m

----, __ ,....,,.

·-""""""" •·. .,.,,"""" D "'°" D •· o~T ..

-

---

STAIN •·. .,.,,_, D "'°" D •• o-~ ..

LEGEND

u'"""'°v

- -

--

I t

0--

I I I Uhmh ......-re ___,.,..,,., ca.a,, - ~l>' • ...,.l

0 0 O 0 0 0 ~ •

'*-....,__..,._-.i-112

0 -.-~-----~~-....,

, .. 0

J

___ ...,..,. ____ ·""""'-"<I"'"""' ....

0 0 = ------. ,.

I --·· br.-5-.. K !-""'Ul - l

c:_..,.._,..tO ... 190 ~ I - I -0 111*~-.-.i ,,. ~-,-·t,,-(tl,

0- ---, .. 1 --.-.:-,,.. ..,....:----. .... • ---0

,..,.,... ____ ~,-------0- --· 0-

= I --------...,...,.. ...... _...,, ... -. ,..--'--_,.,._, ....

""' ..,....,.. __ ~

... ! ... -"'--""'--___ ..,.,.. ..... 10 -...

J ,. l

= ---....-....... ....... ..,_ ... .,_.,.,.,_.,.....,.__ ,,.

? .... ............. ...-e,,,,... ... .., __ m

I ... ---... 0 ...

... 1 0

0

r --~w.--.... ... '30 1 ............... ._........__

~--Cldll, ......... ...., ............ -.....ir ... ........_ ... __. .. ........,......., ............

0-

0 ... • -·.,·---- ----~-~c.,.i-,

• -.... i--.10 ........_ .... ---------... ~.,__.. _ _......

= ..,....._._.,..,,,_,_vi, - .... - ... _,.,,..,..,. _ _ .,..._... .. -... .. c.-

·- _....,...,. .. 0--~~---• ---

5CHTU,n0N 1- ,

~0 I! ij

9

, .. , .. ,. , .. ,.

... ...

... ..

.. C

"' ·c ..0 E "' 0 ... ~ ... a..

m

'" m

O. L.oggeo A,pn1 a 2011 ,-.,-oc-w

Wild roM Oiamex CP.O:Z (DDH02) SE/C-2"-0!M-41w4 55!M45E 6336676N (Z1 2, NADl3)

0rouno Ut 00 m KS 534.00 m

Aenwb C.rrot htc.h PrOJffl Cored lnterviJ 174.00-294.IOm Ltan 10 mocltrite berurntn s.,rurated ~ at 154.00m, not ~gtd wnh thli co,,

----•c---.

--·-,_ ----... --

L.EG!.NO

"""''""' ~--. (.----""'""' -- ----~

·-·-

~-~ ... c...

---0----

-:?" I --

0 . ·-:+. 0 . 0 . 0

0 • :• 0 . - · 0. 0 •

0 . -0 -.

"' ' '

~

.,.

'

~•IOO'l

-:m»j004 u • • • -

1_ ,,, ,...(00I • ·•~•r-

,.., -2W .. IOOI

"""" ----.. ,_ -....a----~ ...,_,. .. ..,._.... ----'91'1----...<Ntlt, ... """' ----------------OD ---.......,, "·"'""'" ------.-1 ............ ---.. ... ......... .... ..,,.., ......,.._.,_.c ------,..,.,.... ... .......,.00,W --"" ................... .,_,""""' ........ -u,.,...._,.,._ .. -----~·KlMJ------... , ...... --_,._ ft!.,.....~ ... fldt ..... ._ , ... , .............. .., ... --...... ._ l n,,t .. ..... ...... 11.

tt.;'"'*~~ ""'--1.._d. ...

•• , .. c-.. ..... ............. .,..,.. -----·--int.,......_,_ ----...,_,,_ ..,,,,,,, .... .__OClt -·-... .......... ~ .. ,....._,~ IC ~---Wftdt -.. _ .. _ ---·-· _., .,..,....,, ----...,.~....,._u ,.,. ........ _ --_,.. .... "--'I .. -14) 1 UIU~ ~ W*lll'IIIJII~-......... ,...,... ....... C.--). .,._,. ••

* ........ le""" ... ...... ,,_ ---,_., ..... .-..i ... -,... ,,.,, ......, ............. ·--.... ... -/t/.WI U ,.., _..,_ .... .,..,... .,~ -l H.J.J'Ml l.fC>fl ~#t•• Wt-1N ~ .... ,.,... ,. .,,.. ~ .. """",.,....· nct....,.ltllMISG tC>4...,.,•cer•.,.,... .,_ ..

tr.il"'• - 1

: : : :

---.... 230-

/

10

t" I ,.)r l)C ..

I -. .........

APEX Geoscience Summary of Basement Core Analysis Core2

(Core 1 not sampled, Pree. not Intercepted)

11

APEX Geoscience Ltd.

To: Nigel Hopkins Wildrose Diamex Corp. 130, 3359 - 27th Street NE Calgary, AB T1Y 5E4

From: Roy Eccles, APEX Geoscience ltd. Date: 4 May 2017

# 11 0, 8429 - 24 Street Edmonton, AB· T6P · I L3 Bus. 780-467-3532 · Fax 780-467-4025

RE: Geochemical Summary of Samples from Drillhole CP-2

Dear Nigel,

[email protected] www.apexgeoscience.com G.S.T. #: 13693 6119 RPOOO I

The intent of this Memorandum is to present and discuss the analytical results of eight Precambrian basement samples from drillhole CP-2. The laboratory certificates are attached as a separate file.

The samples were analyzed at the Bureau Veritas Mineral Laboratory in Vancouver, BC (formerly Acmelabs). Sample preparation and geochemical analysis included: code PRP?0-250 (crush, split and pulverize 250 g of rock to 200 mesh); and code AQ252_PGM_REE (Aqua Regia digestion Ultratrace ICP-MS analytical package with PGE and REE add-ons). The sample pulps and rejects are still at the lab and will be returned to APEX after 90 and 60 days, respectively. Once the pulps/rejects are received, they will be forwarded to Wildrose (along with the drill cores). Wildrose can conduct further analyses on the samples at any time (not recommended at this time by the author).

The geochemical results are presented in their entirety in Table 1, and graphically in histograms (Figure 1) and total linear abundances (Figure 2). Observations of the geochemical results are as follows:

• The results had generally low metallogenic results; for example,

o With the exception of sample RE17-WR-CP2-001 (0.2 ppb Au), gold was below the limit of detection (<0.2 ppb Au).

o Silver values were low (between 7 and 15 ppm Ag).

o Base metals were generally low (e.g., up to 7.3 ppm Cu; 4.1 ppm Pb; 16.6 ppm Zn; 19.8 ppm Ni; 6.8 ppm Co).

o Epithem1al pathfinder elements were generally low (e.g., up to 2.1 ppm As; 0.2 ppm Bi; <5 ppm Hg; <0.1 ppm Se).

o PGE metals Pd and pt were below the limit of detection (<10 ppb Pd and <2 ppb pt)_

• Relative to this dataset, sample RE17-WR-CP2-005 yielded the highest values of Ni (19.8 ppm Ni) and Cr (20.1 ppm Cr).

• By far, the most interesting sample in this dataset belongs to sample RE17-WR-CP2-003. This sample has numerous elements that are elevated relative to this dataset. For example,

APEX Geoscience Ltd. www.apexgeoscience.com

12

-Figure 2 shows that CP2-003 has the highest Zn (16.6 ppm Zn), Mn (483 ppm Mn), U (14.9 ppm U), Th (275.2 ppm Th), and Sr (75.2 ppm Sr). In addition, the most interesting chemical variation between sample CP2-003 and the other seven samples is the significantly high rare earth element (REE) content (Table 1, Figure 3).

• The chondrite-normalized REE profile for CP2-003 resembles what one might expect of an alkaline rock. This is unexpected because this sample section of core did not resemble alkaline material stricto sensu. It was observed that this particular section of the basement core was highly hematized, finer grained, effervesced slightly to 10% HCI and generally did not resemble the highly altered gneissic rock paragenesis (that dominate the basement core) . Despite these observations, it is difficult to log this core section as a different rock type; mainly because of the high and pervasive hematization of the basement core, which in general, gives it all a similar appearance (see photos in Appendix).

• As it turns out, the scintillometer was useful in the logging and sampling exercise as the level of scintillation was really the key to selecting the CP2-003 sample site. That is, in addition to having a slightly different grain size/texture and slight carbonate content, this section of core had the highest total counts (a narrow <20 cm zone of 230 total counts).

What does the inclusion of an alkaline rock type mean? Well, I would not go far enough to suggest that the alkaline rock is ultramafic; in contrast, elements other than REE suggest the CP2-003 core section appears to have low mantle component (e.g ., low Mg and Ni).

Accordingly, a conclusion that can be drawn from the core logging and geochemical sampling is that the basement in the vicinity of drillhole CP-2 has been significantly altered. Evidence for this includes pervasive hematization and localized silica stringers and veinlets. In addition, a single sample suggests that there is also evidence of alkaline fluids and/or intrusions. Thus it is possible that the region has undergone multiple episodes of alteration. Despite the pervasive alteration, this small sampling of the basement does not appear to contain elevated metal contents.

To conclude with general thoughts on the program: The idea of circular seismic anomalies associated with kimberlite-indicator mineral trends is a compelling story. However, it is difficult to make recommendations on the program as APEX has yet to see/review/interpret the Wildrose dataset at large. While the two drillholes CP-1 and CP-2 have failed to intersect kimberlitic rock types, it is possible that a thorough review and working of the geophysical information and kimberliteindicator mineral data (if they exist) by knowledgeable and experienced diamond geologists can help to organize, interpret and enable meaningful recommendations on a diamond program at the Wildrose Property.

Roy Eccles Chief Operations Officer APEX Geoscience ltd. Suite 110, 8429 - 24th Street Edmonton, Alberta, T6P 1 L3 Canada Phone: (780) 467-3532 Email: [email protected]


13

-Table 1. Geochemical results (all data). Units and minimum limit of detection are included in the header. Elevated values relative to this dataset are highlighted in yellow.

Wgt Mo Cu Pb Zn Ag Ni Co Mn Fe As U Au Th Sr Cd Sb Bi V Ca P La Cr Mg Ba TI B

KG PPM PPM PPM PPM PPB PPM PPM PPM % PPM PPM PPB PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM % % PPM PPM % PPM % PPM

Sample ID Depth (m) Media 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.1 2 0.1 0.1 1 0.01 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.01 0.02 0.02 2 0.01 0.001 0.5 0.5 0.01 0.5 0.001 1

RE17-WR-CP2-001 245.1-245.9 Drill Core 0.53 1.07 3.12 1.23 3.8




RE17-WR-CP2-00S 277.3-277.6 Drill Core 0.62 0.89 3.51 1.43 8.4




Pulp Dupl icates

12 3.1 1.6 117 0.55 0.9 1.3 0.2 7.2 29.3 <0.01 0.02 0.09 7 2.29 0.136 10.3 5.2 1.03 21.2 0.001 9

7 3.9 1.2 so 0. 71 0.5 1.4 <0.2 9 14 0.01 0.02 0.05 13 0.54 0.034 7.4 8 0.24 18 0.001 8

8 7.7 4.8 483 1.55 1.8 14.9 <0.2 275.2 75.8 0.14 <0.02 0.06 24 3.66 0.129 200.7 5.2 2.01 28.3 0.002 16

9 2.6 2.1 254 0.65 0.4 0.8 <0.2 3.3 16.9 0.06 <0.02 0.02 5 2.33 0.029 8.5 9.3 1.23 17.5 <0.001 4

9 19.8 6.8 420 1.67 2.1 1.2 <0.2 4.9 19.3 0.06 <0.02 0.02 31 2.42 0.055 6.2 20.1 1.48 18.2 0.003 7

15 4 3 195 0.68 0.3 1.5 <0.2 6.7 18.2 0.06 <0.02 0.19 6 1.51 0.072 7.7 7.6 0.76 14.2 0.001 7

7 2.9 2.1 79 0.98 0.3 2.8 <0.2 11.6 19.7 0.01 <0.02 0.16 3 0.48 0.046 15.2 4 0.3 15.3 0.001 11

8 4.9 4.5 127 1.39 0.2 1.9 <0.2 6.5 22 0.03 <0.02 0.18 5 0.75 0.054 8.8 4.2 0.49 19.3 0.001 9

RE17-WR-CP2-008

RE17-WR-CP2-008

Drill Core 0.72 1.45 7.19 1.75 5.4 8 4.9 4.5 127 1.39 0.2 1.9 <0.2

REP 1.48 7.31 1.69 5 7 5 4.3 123 1.4 <0.1 1.9 <0.2

Min 0.71 1.93 1.23 3.2 7 2.6 1.2 SO 0.55 0.2 0.8 0.2

Max 1.75 7.31 4.09 16.6 15 19.8 6.8 483 1.67 2.1 14.9 0.2

Avg 1.22 4.215 1.87 6.87 9 5.88 3.49 198 1.1 0.74 2.96 0.2

6.5 22 0.03 <0.02 0.18 5 0.75 0.054 8.8 4.2 0.49 19.3 0.001 9

6.4 20.4 0.02 <0.02 0.17 5 0.75 0.056 8.1 4.1 0.49 18.9 0.001 10

3.3 14 0.01 0.02 0.02 3 0.48 0.029 6.2 4 0.24 14.2 0.001 4

275.2 75.8 0.14 0.02 0.19 31 3.66 0.136 200.7 20.1 2.01 28.3 0.003 16

33.73 25.76 0.05 0.02 0.11 10.4 1.55 0.067 28.17 7.19 0.85 19 0.001 9

Wgt Al Na K W Sc Tl S Hg Se Te Ga Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Pd Pt

KG % % % PPM PPM PPM % PPB PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPM PPB PPB

Sample ID Depth (m) Media 0.01 0.01 0.001 0.01 0.1 0.1 0.02 0.02 5 0.1 0.02 0.1 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 10 2

RE17-WR-CP2-001 245.1-245.9 Drill Core 0.53 0.67 0.025 0.37 <0.1 5.1 0.1 0.19 <5 <0.1 <0.02 2.3 2.71 12.4 3.13 0.77 3.61 0.53 3.39 0.67 1.92 0.29 1.95 0.26 <10 <2

RE17-WR-CP2-002 248.7-249.3 Drill Core 0.57 0.55 0.025 0.31 <0.1 1.8 0.09 0.2 <S <0.1 <0.02 1.9 1.97 8.1 1.68 0.35 1.21 0.19 1.34 0.28 0.79 0.12 0.78 0.11 <10 <2

RE17-WR-CP2-003 264.5-264.9 Drill Core 0.62 1.02 0.032 0.51 <0.1 3 0.16 <0.02 <5 <0.1 <0.02 3.5 55.71 226.31 37.69 6.67 18.13 1.63 6.8 0.93 2.22 0.27 1.88 0.23 <10 <2

RE17-WR-CP2-004 271.2-271.5 Drill Core 0.51 0.35 0.026 0.21 <0.1 1.3 0.07 <0.02 <5 <0.1 <0.02 1.2 2.11 9.15 1.86 0.49 1.49 0.17 0.89 0.17 0.46 0.07 0.48 0.07 <10 <2

RE17-WR-CP2-00S 277.3-277.6 Drill Core 0.62 0.86 0.019 0.3 <0.1 5.7 0.1 0.05 <5 <0.1 <0.02 3.4 1.86 8.73 2.42 0.72 2.34 0.29 1.5 0.26 0.7 0.1 0.63 0.09 <10 <2

RE17-WR-CP2-006 285.0-286.5 Drill Core 0.78 0.54 0.017 0.28 <0.1 3.3 0.1 <0.02 <5 <0.1 0.12 1.8 2.13 9.72 2.17 0.64 2.23 0.29 1.81 0.34 0.99 0.14 0.95 0.14 <10 <2



Pulp Duplicates

RE17-WR-CP2-008

RE17-WR-CP2-008

Drill Core 0.72 0.75 0.022 0.31 <0.1 4.3 0.09 <0.02 <5 <0.1 0.05 2.2 2.32 10.48 2.41 0.51 2.41 0.3 1.68 0.31 0.87 0.11 0.83 0.11 <10 <2

REP 0.74 0.022 0.31 <0.1 4.1 0.09 <0.02 <5 <0.1 0.04 2.2 2.35 10.14 2.21 0.5 2.24 0.29 1.68 0.3 0.86 0.12 0.76 0.1 <10 <2

Min 0.35 0.017 0.21 0 1.3 0.06 0.05 0 0 0.02 1.2 1.86 8.1 1.68 0.35 1.21 0.17 0.89 0.17 0.46 0.07 0.48 0.06 0 0

Max 1.02 0.032 0.51 0 5.7 0.16 0.2 0 0 0.12 3.5 55.71 226.31 37.69 6.67 18.13 1.63 6.8 0.93 2.22 0.29 1.95 0.26 0 0

Avg 0.68 0.023 0.32 / 3.45 0.1 0.15 / / 0.06 2.24 7.776 32.25 5.908 1.18 3.819 0.42 2.2 0.38 1.017 0.14 0.96 0.13 / I


14

-Figure 1. Histograms (all data).

§ 2 .5 0 0

§ 2.5 0 0

E 2 .5 ::::, 0 u

Mo_ppm

1.0 HI

20 bins 0.052 wide

Mn_ppm

250 500

20 bins 21.650 wide

Cd_ppm

0.0 _ _ ,___.._

0 .00 0 .05 0 .10

§ 2 .5 0 u

0 .0

§ 2 .5 0 u

20 bins 0.007 wide

Cr_ppm

1-t. _._ 5 10 15 20

20 bins 0.805 wide

K_pct

0 .0 4-A--_..l,ll-_._ 0 .2 0 .3 0.4 0 .5

20 bins 0.015 wide

Nd_ppm E g 5 0

E 2 .5 ::::, 0 u

0 ~

0 100 200

20 bins 1 0.91 0 wide

Er_ppm

0 .5 1.0 1.5 2 .0

20 bins 0.088 wide

Cu_ppm

2 3 4 !5 C 7

20 bins 0.269 wide

Fe_pct

(~ __ Lt 0 .5 1.0 U5

20 bins 0.056 wide

Sb_ppm

0 0 .00 0 .01 0 .02

20 bins 0.001 wide

Mg_pct E 2 .5 ::::, 0 u IJ LL 0 .0

0 .5 1.0 1.5 2 .0

20 bins 0.088 wide

Sc _ppm 2 c

g 1 0

0 2 3 4 5

20 bins 0.220 wide

Sm_ppm

c g 5 0

0 • 0 10 20 30

20 bins 1.800 wide

Tm_ppm 2

E g 1 0

0 0 .1 0 .2 0 .3

20 bins 0.011 wide

Pb_ppm

2 3 4

20 bins 0.143 wide

As_ppm E 2 I g 1 0

0 0 .0 0 .5 1.0 1.5 2.0

2 c ;51 0

2 c g, u

0

20 bins 0.105 wide

Bi_ppm

0.05 0 .10 0 .15

20 bins 0.008 wide

Ba_ppm

L 15 20 25

20 bins 0.705 wide

Tl _ppm

§ 2 .5 0 0

0 .0 0 .10 0 .15

20 bins 0.005 wide

Eu _ppm

§ 5 0 0

0 1 2 3 4 5 C

20 bins 0.31 6 wide

Yb _ppm E 2 .5 ::::, 0 0

0 .0 0 .5 1.0 1 .5 2 .0

20 bins 0.07 4 wide

E 2 .5 ::::, 0 0

5 .0 c ;5 2 .5 0

0 .0

E ::, 2 .5 0

Zn_ppm

5 10 1!5

20 bins 0.670 wide

U_ppm

5 10 15

20 bins 0.705 wide

V_ppm

O 0 .0 .......,,..._,~ -~· _J_ 10 20 30

20 bins 1.400 wide

Ti_pct

]:1 _. -4-0.000 0 .001 0 .002 0 .003

20 bins 0.000 wide

S_pct

§ 5 0 0

0 - -----~ 0 .0 0 .1 0 .2

20 bins 0.01 0 wide

Gd_ppm E 5 .0 ::::, I 8 2 .5

0 .0 5 10 15

20 bins 0.846 wide

Lu_ppm c 2 .5 ::::, 0 0

0 .0 0 .1 0.2

20 bins 0.01 0 wide


c 2 .5 ::::, 0 0

0 .0

c g 5 0

Ag_ppm

l 7 .5 10.0 12.5 15 .0

20 bins 0.400 wide

Au_ppb

0 .,_

c 2 .5 ::::, 0 0

0 .0 0 . 1 0 .2

20 bins 0.01 0 wide

Ca_pct

1 2 3

20 bins 0.159 wide

B_ppm

E 2.5 ::::, 0 0

0.0

c g 5 0

0

Ni_ppm

5 10 15 20

20 bins 0.860 wide

Th_ppm

0 100 200

20 bins 13.595 wide

P_pct

~

0 .05 0 .10

20 bins 0.005 wide

Al_pct

1 2 .5 i I 0 o.ok ~ L rt lul 0 .0 I L

5 .0 E g 2.!5 0

5 10 15

20 bins 0.600 wide

Te_ppm

0 .0 .,._.._,.._.__ 0.00 0 .05 0 .10

20 bins 0.006 wide

Tb_ppm 5 .0

I E g 2 .!5 0 • J 0 .0

0 .5 1.0 1.5

20 bins 0.073 wide

Sample

] 2 .5 j 0 .0

0 .50 0 .75 1.00

20 bins 0.034 wide

Ga_ppm

1 .5 2 .0 2 .5 3.0 3 .5

20 bins 0.11 5 wide

Dy_ppm

~ l 1 2 3 4 5 C 7

20 bins 0.296 wide

Co_ppm

~l ..-L 1 234507

20 bins 0.280 wide

Sr_ppm c 2 .5 ::::, 0

0 0 .0 .......,._..__ l

E g 5 0

25 50 75

20 bins 3.090 wide

La_ppm

0 ~ 0 50 100 150 200

20 bins 9.725 wide

Na_pct

] 2 .5 ~ J 0 .0 li1 T L

c g 5 0

0

E Hi ::::, 0 0

0 .0

0.020 0 .025 0 .030

20 bins 0.001 wide

Pr_ppm

0 25 50

20 bins 2.692 wide

Ho_ppm

~ J L 0.25 0 .50 0 .75

20 bins 0.038 wide

e RE 17-WR -CP 2-00 1

e RE17~ JR-CP2-002

e RE17~ JR-CP2-003

e RE17-WR-CP2-004

e RE17-Vi/R-CP2-005

e RE17-WR-CP2-006

e RE17-WR-CP2-007

e RE17-WR-CP2-008

15

Figure 2. Data summary (all data).

475

400

3!50

325

300

275

200

175

150

125

100

o -


, \ I

Sample e RE17-WR-a>2-001

e RE17-WR-CP2-002

e RE 17-WR-a>2-003

e RE17-WR<P2-004

e RE17-WR-a>2-00S

e RE17-WR-CP2-006

e RE17-WR-a>2-007

e RE17-WR-a>2-008

16

Figure 3. Chondrite-normalized rare-earth element plot (all data).

=c, 1000 Q)

°' °' 0 :::::!. -l,C') a, a, ..-.c Ol :::, 0 C 0 0 100 (.)

:::!?! -0 C ro C :::,

Cl) ...... E '-0 z Q) -·;::: -0 C 0 .c 0 ..-0 w w 0:::

10


Sample e RE17-WR-cP2-00 1

e RE17-WR-cP2-002

e RE 17-WR<:P2-003

e RE17-WR-cP2-004

e RE 17-WR<:P2-00S

e RE 17-WR-cP2-006

e RE 17-WR-cP2-007

e RE17-WR-cP2-008

17

-Appendix: Core photos at sample RE17-WR-CP2-003 (Drillhole CP-2; 264.5-264.9 m)


18

-


19

--( ' /"') ~ l)C- .,

.., .. .__., ......... .

Bureau Veritas Mineral Laboratory, Vancouver Lab Results of Eight (8} Samples

Core2 (Core 1 not sampled}

20

MINERAL LABORATORIES Canada

Bureau Veritas Commodities Canada Ltd.

www.bureauveritas.com/um

9050 Shaughnessy St Vancouver British Columbia V6P 6E5 Canada PHONE (604) 253-3158

Client:

Submitted By:

APEX Geoscience Ltd. Unit 110, 8429 24th St NW

Edmonton Alberta T6P 1 L3 Canada

Roy Eccles

Receiving Lab: Canada-Vancouver

Received: April 12, 2017

Report Date: May 03, 2017

Page: 1 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS VAN17000673.1

CLIENT JOB INFORMATION

Project: None Given

Shipment ID:

P.O. Number

Number of Samples: 8

SAMPLE DISPOSAL

RTRN-PLP

RTRN-RJT

Return After 90 days

Return After 60 days

Bureau Veritas does not accept responsibility for samples left at the laboratory after 90 days without prior written instructions for sample storage or return.

Invoice To:

CC:

APEX Geoscience Ltd. Unit 110, 8429 24th St NW Edmonton Alberta T6P 1 L3 Canada

SAMPLE PREPARATION AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Procedure Number of Code Description Test Report Code Samples Wgt(g) Status

BAT01 Batch charge of <20 samples

PRP70-250 8 Crush, split and pulverize 250 g rock to 200 mesh

AQ252_PGM_REE 8 1:1:1 Aqua Regia digestion Ultratrace ICP-MS analysis 30 Completed

DRPLP 8 Warehouse handling / disposition of pulps

DRRJT 8 Warehouse handling / Disposition of reject

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS

---This report supersedes all previous prel1m1nary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. All results are considered the confidential property of the client. Bureau Ventas assumes the liabil~ies for actual cost of analysis only. Results apply to samples as submitted. · - asterisk indicates that an analytical result could not be provided due to unusually high levels of interference from other elements.

21

Lab

VAN

VAN

VAN

VAN

VAN

MINERAL LABORATORIES Canada www.bureauveritas.com/um



Method WGHT AQ252 AQ252 AQ252

Analyte Wgt Mo Cu Pb

Unit kg ppm ppm ppm

MDL 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01

RE17-WR-CP2-001 Drill Core 0.53 1.07 3.12 1.23








AQ252 AQ252 AQ252

Zn Ag Ni

ppm ppb ppm

0.1 2 0.1

3.8 12 3.1

6.7 7 3.9

16.6 8 7.7

10.4 9 2.6

8.4 9 19.8

3.8 15 4.0

3.2 7 2.9

5.4 8 4.9

AQ252

Co

ppm

0.1

1.6

1.2

4.8

2.1

6.8

3.0

2.1

4.5

AQ252 AQ252

Mn Fe

ppm %

1 0.01

117 0.55

50 0.71

483 1.55

254 0.65

420 1.67

195 0.68

79 0,98

127 1.39

Client:

Project

Report Date:

Page:

AQ252 AQ252

As u ppm ppm

0.1 0.1

0.9 1.3

0,5 1.4

1.8 14.9

0.4 0.8

2.1 1.2

0.3 1.5

0.3 2.8

0.2 1.9



None Given

May 03, 2017

2 of 2

AQ252 AQ252

Au Th

ppb ppm

0.2 0 .1

0.2 7.2

<0.2 9.0

<0.2 275.2

<0.2 3.3

<0.2 4.9

<0.2 6.7

<0.2 11.6

<0.2 6.5

AQ252 AQ252 AQ252

Sr Cd Sb

ppm ppm ppm

0.5 0 .01 0.02

29.3 <0.01 0.02

14.0 0.01 0.02

75.8 0.14 <0.02

16.9 0.06 <0.02

19.3 0.06 <0.02

18.2 0.06 <0.02

19.7 0.01 <0.02

22.0 0.03 <0.02

This report .supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.

Part: 1 of 3

AQ252 AQ252 AQ25

Bi V C

ppm ppm %

0.02 2 0.01

0.09 7 2.2

0.05 13

0.06 24

0.02 5

0.02 31 2.4

0.19 6

0.16 3 0.4

0.18 5 0.7

22

MINERAL LABORATORIES Canada www.bureauveritas.com/um



Method AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252

Analyte p La Cr Mg

Unit % ppm ppm % MOL 0.001 0 .5 0.5 0 .01






RE17-WR-CP2-006 Drill Core 0.072 7.7 7.6 0,76



AQ252 AQ252 AQ252

Ba Ti B

ppm % ppm

0.5 0.001 1

21 .2 0.001 9

18.0 0.001 8

28.3 0.002 16

17.5 <0,001 4

18.2 0.003 7

14.2 0.001 7

15.3 0.001 11

19.3 0.001 9

AQ252

Al

% 0.01

0.67

0.55

1.02

0.35

0.86

0.54

0.60

0.75

Client:

Project:

Report Date:

Page:

AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252

Na K w Sc

% % ppm ppm

0.001 0.01 0.1 0.1

0.025 0.37 <0.1 5.1

0.025 0.31 <0.1 1.8

0.032 0.51 <0.1 3.0

0.026 0.21 <0.1 1.3

0.019 0.30 <0.1 5.7

0.017 0.28 <0.1 3.3

0.022 0.30 <0.1 1.6

0.022 0.31 <0.1 4.3



None Given

May 03, 2017

2 of2

AQ252 AQ252

Tl s ppm %

0.02 0.02

0.10 0.19

0.09 0.20

0.16 <0.02

0.07 <0.02

0.10 0.05

0.10 <0.02

0.06 <0.02

0.09 <0.02

AQ252 AQ252 AQ252

Hg Se Te

ppb ppm ppm

5 0.1 0.02

<5 <0.1 <0.02

<5 <0.1 <0.02

<5 <0.1 <0.02

<5 <0.1 <0.02

<5 <0.1 <0.02

<5 <0.1 0.12

<5 <0.1 0.02

<5 <0.1 0.05

This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this cer1ificate. Signature indicates final approval; prelknlnary reports are unsigned and shOuld be used for reference only.

-Part: 2 of 3

AQ252 AQ252 AQ25

Ga Pr N

ppm ppm pp

0.1 0.02

2.3 2.71

1.9 1.97

3.5 55.71 226.31

1.2 2.11 9.1

3.4 1.86 8.7

1.8 2.13 9.7

1.7 4.28 16.9

2.2 2.32 10.4

23




9050 Shaughnessy St Vancouver British Columbia V6P 6E5 Canada PHONE (604) 253--3158

Client:

Project:

Report Date:

Page:



None Given

May 03, 2017

2 of 2 Part:

.CERTIFICATE OF ANAhYSH3 ' -_ VAN17000673.1 , ..

Method AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ25 Analyte Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Pd p

Unit ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppb pp MDL 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0 .02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 10

RE17-WR-CP2-001 Drill Core 3.13 0.77 3.61 0.53 3.39 0.67 1.92 0.29 1.95 0.26 <10




RE17-WR-CP2-005 Drill Core 2.42 0,72 2.34 0.29 1.50 0.26 0.70 0.10 0.63 0.09 <10

RE1 7-WR-CP2-006 Drill Core 2.17 0.64 2.23 0.29 1.81 0.34 0.99 0.14 0.95 0,14 <10


RE17-WR-CP2-008 Drill Core 2.41 0.51 2.4 1 0.30 1.68 0.31 0.87 0.11 0.83 0.11 <10

This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Stgnaiure indicates final approval. preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only. 24

3 of 3




Client:

Project:

Report Date:

Page:


Edmonton Alberta TSP 1 L3 Canada

None Given

May 03, 2017

1 of 1 Part 1 of 3

QUALITY CONTROL-REPOR"-r .. ... -. · . '.--·-~· . . . . VAN17000673.1 !, . •

Method WGHT AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ262 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ262 AQ262 AQ252 AQ252 Analyte Wgt Mo Cu Pb Zn Ag Ni Co Mn Fe As u Au Th Sr Cd Sb Bi V Ca

Unit kg ppm ppm ppm ppm ppb ppm ppm ppm ¾ ppm ppm ppb ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm o/c MDL 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.1 2 0.1 0 .1 1 0 .01 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.01 0.02 0.02 2 0.01

Pulp Duplicates

RE17-WR-CP2-008 Drill Core 0.72 1.45 7.19 1.75 5.4 8 4.9 4.5 127 1.39 0.2 1.9 <0.2 6.5 22.0 0.03 <0.02 0.18 5 o.n REP RE17-WR-CP2-008 QC 1.48 7.31 1.69 5.0 7 5.0 4.3 123 1.40 <0.1 1.9 <0.2 6.4 20.4 0.02 <0.02 0.17 5 0.7! Reference Materials

STD DS10 Standard 15.92 146.43 155.70 375.9 1964 79.2 14.5 863 2.82 46.1 2.7 96.5 7.5 72.5 2.71 8.78 12.11 42 1.1,

STD OXC129 Standard 1.30 27.38 6.01 43.0 14 82.3 20.8 434 3.09 0.4 0.7 199.3 1.7 201.0 0.05 0.03 <0.02 49 0.7 ' STD DS10 Expected 15.1 154.61 150.55 370 2020 74.6 12.9 875 2.7188 46.2 2.59 91 .9 7.5 67.1 2.62 9 11.65 43 1.062! STD OXC129 Expected 1.3 28 6.3 42.9 28 79.5 20.3 421 3.065 0.6 0.72 195 1.9 0.03 0.04 51 0.66! BLK Blank <0.01 <O 01 <0.01 <0.1 <2 <O 1 <0.1 <1 <0.01 <0.1 <0.1 <0.2 <0.1 <0.5 <0.01 <O 02 <0.02 <2 <0.01

Prep Wash

ROCK-VAN Prep Blank 1.09 3.59 2.03 41 .7 12 4.2 5.0 617 2.02 1.4 0.5 <0.2 2.5 28.0 0.03 0.08 0.03 26 0.7,

This report supersedes all previous prehminary and final reports with this fite number dated prior to the date on this certificate . Stgnalure indicates final approval; prehmlnary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference onty

25





Client:

Project:

Report Date:

Page:



None Given

May 03, 2017

1 of 1 Part: 2 of 3

QUALITY CONTROL REPORT . - _, . VAN 17000673.1 ' .. . . -

Method AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ25,

Analyte p La Cr Mg Ba Ti B Al Na K w Sc Tl s Hg Se Te Ga Pr Nd

Unit % ppm ppm % ppm % ppm % % % ppm ppm ppm % ppb ppm ppm ppm ppm pprr

MDL 0.001 0.5 0.5 0.01 0.5 0.001 1 0.01 0.001 0.01 0.1 0.1 0.02 0.02 5 0.1 0.02 0.1 0.02 0.0,

Pulp Duplicates

RE17-WR-CP2-008 Drill Core 0.054 8.8 4.2 0.49 19.3 0.001 9 0.75 0.022 0.31 <0.1 4.3 0.09 <0.02 <5 <0.1 0.05 2.2 2.32 10.48

REP RE17-WR-CP2-008 QC 0.056 8.1 4.1 0.49 18.9 0.001 10 0.74 0.022 0.31 <0.1 4.1 0.09 <0.02 <5 <0.1 0.04 2.2 2.35 10.14

Reference Materials

STD DS10 Standard 0.077 19.0 57.7 0.81 344.8 0.090 7 1.12 0.074 0.35 3.4 3.2 5.32 0.27 304 2.1 5.18 4.7 4.11 16.35

STD OXC129 Standard 0.101 12.8 55.3 1.57 50.9 0.414 <1 1.66 0.623 0.38 0.1 0.9 0.04 <0.02 <5 <0.1 0.02 5.6 2.57 10.08

STD DS10 Expected 0.0765 17.5 54.6 0.775 359 0.0817 1.0755 0.067 0.338 3.32 3 5.1 0.29 300 2.3 5.01 4.5 3.89 14.07

STD OXC129 Expected 0.102 13 52 1.545 50 0.4 1 1.58 0.6 0.37 0.08 1.1 0.03 5.6 2.64 9.~

BLK Blank <0.001 <0.5 <0.5 <0.01 <0.5 <0.001 <1 <0.01 <0.001 <0.01 <0.1 <0.1 <0.02 <0.02 <5 <0.1 <0.02 <0.1 <0.02 <0.02

Prep Wash

ROCK-VAN Prep Blank 0.047 7.6 16.3 0.57 72.8 0.097 3 1.30 0.203 0.17 0.1 4.2 <0.02 <0.02 5 <0.1 <0.02 4.8 1.93 8.13

This report supersedes all previous preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certrflcate. Signature Indicates final approval: preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.

26





Client:

Project:

Report Date:

Page:



None Given

May 03, 2017

1 of 1 Part:

QUALITY CONTROL REPORT VAN17000673.1 Method AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252 AQ252

Analyte Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu Pd

Unit ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppm ppb

MOL 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 10

Pulp Duplicates


REP RE17-WR-CP2-008 QC 2.21 0.50 2.24 0.29 1.68 0.30 0.86 0.12 0.76 0.10 <10

Reference Materials

STD DS10 Standard 2.81 0.58 2.39 0.29 1.70 0.30 0.88 0.15 0.87 0.12 102

STD OXC129 Standard 1.69 0.54 1.55 0.18 1.03 0.17 0.48 0.06 0.44 0.05 15

STD DS1 O Expected 2.51 0.48 2.17 0.29 1.53 0.29 0.79 0.11 0.74 0.11 110 191

STD OXC129 Expected 1.6 0.47 1.31 0.19 0.99 0.18 0.45 0.06 0.38 0.05

BLK Blank <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <0.02 <10 <

Prep Wash

ROCK-VAN Prep Blank 1.70 0.43 1.83 0.30 1.85 0.35 1.08 0.16 1.19 0.17 <10 <

This report supersedes all prevfou s preliminary and final reports with this file number dated prior to the date on this certificate. Signature indicates final approval ; preliminary reports are unsigned and should be used for reference only.

27

3 of 3

-

-,. ,,, .1-... ~l)C

l ~ _,

Alberta Caribou Protection Plan Outline

28

-

....._ I _)f l)('

l ..

Caribou Protection Plan

.Prepare<J for t.,VIOOUEST SER ICES LTD ;t I~ 3359 - ~7 :,Ueet>i E Cal9,:ir,. AB ~IY ~E4

Carrol Patch 16 Metallic r/Jnef'3I Coring Progr.im-2016/2017 Act ,,ty To,.,11ships 89-96. and Ranges 1-9'v\4M

Near Fort Macl<ay. Alb<:rta

Fi'e 1~.B0063I OCTOBER 2016

29

-

-.. t ;,,, I ";

~ Ii(· I ~ _,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 ltHROOUCTIOtl ............................... . ............... --................ - ................... - ................................. 1

2.0 COMMUNICATIONS .. - ............................................................. _ ..................................................... 1

3.0 PROJECT OESCRIPTIOtJ ................................... _ .................. --········ ....... - ..................... - .......... 2

3.1 PROPOSE02016/2017 IJETALUC M NERALCORINGPROGRAM ...................................................... 2 3.1. 1 Progrnm Are:i ........................................................................................... _ ............................ 3 3.1 2 Access ............................................................................. - ............ ... . ......................... 3 3. 1.3 Ttmber S-ilv/lge . . ............... - ......... ....... .... ................. ... 3 3.1.4 Core Hole DriJfing .................................................................................................................... 3 3.1.5 C~:,n-up .................................. _._ .......................................................... - ........................... 3 3.1.6 Accommodations ........................................... ...................................................................... :.i

3.2 TIMING .......................................................... . . ............... - ...................................................... 3

4.0 BIOPHYSICAL SETTING RELATED TO CARIBOU PROTECTION PLANNING .............................. 4

4 .1 NAlVRAL REG CNS ANO SU6REGIONS ............................................................................................ 4 4.1.1 Ath:Jb/lSCI) P/l)Jn N:Jtur:il Subreg,on ................ -............................................................ .. ... 4 4.1.2 Centrnl MiJ<edwood Noturol Subregion .......... _ .. .......................................................... ..... 5

4.2 CUMATE ....................................................... - ............................................................................. 5 4 .3 WOODV.NO CAAlaou POPU!ATlc»l ................................................................................................. 6

5.0 CARIBOU PROTECTION PRltlCIPLES ............ - ......................................... - .................................. 6

6.0 PROTECTIOtl MEASURES ANO MITIGATION-......................................... - ................................. 7

7.0 FUTURE OPERATIOtlS ..................................... _._ ......................................................... - .............. 8

8.0 COHCLUSIOtJ ....................................................... . .................................. - ..................... _ ......... 9

9.0 REFEREtlCES ......... _.................................................................... ...................................... .. ... 10

UTEAATURE CITED .......................................................................... - ....................................................... 10 STAlVTcS Crrt:D ............ ............... .............................................................. .. .................... . ......... 10

10.0 DISCLAIMER ........................................................................... - .................. .................................... 11

TABLES

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

FIGURES

Figure 1a

Figure 1b

Figure 2

Existino and New CutJ111es in Caribou and Non-Canbou Areas

Program Activity Timlng

Proposed Protection and Mitigation Measures to Avoid or Reduce Potential Effects on Caribou and Caribou Habitat

Garibou Protection Area Map Caribou Protection Area Map

Program Area

30

-

CONCLUSIONS

Well results verified that the features tested with the Ql 2017 program were not kimberlite intrusions. The program was chosen to test the very largest features but were not representative of all of the geological features over the leases. Previous work in the area has indicated that diamond indicator analysis shows a hot spot in the vicinity of the drilling. Wildrose Diamex proposes a second round of drilling would be needed to test features not related to the intrusions evaluated by the Ql 2017 work .

..... r- I"'\

~ l)l' l ~ _,

., ..... . , ..... .... .

31

STATEMENT OF QUALIFICATIONS

I, Nigel Hopkins, P. Geoph., residing in the city of Calgary, Alberta, do hereby certify that I accept

responsibility for the veracity of the technical data and results presented in this assessment report of August 2017, and that:

);;,, I am a practicing geophysicst with Wildrose Diamex Corp.

>"' I hold a combined B Sc. Honours Geophysics/Geology degree, 1976 from UBC, Vancouver, BC

~ I have practiced geophysics and geology continuously for approximately 41 years

>"' I am a registered geophysicist in Alberta, member number 33541

};>- I am President and CEO of Wildrose Diamex Corp.

>"' I was present for all 2017 field operations both initial environmental scouting and w inter drilling and reclamation work

Dated: August 30, 2017

Nigel Hopkins, P. Geoph.

M 33541

( ' , I ~ DC ,:

32

mar 20170012: telephone lake east - alberta energy · invoice total description environmentalist $...

Documents