managerial ethics & corporate social responsibility

19
Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Upload: malcolm-russell-pope

Post on 13-Jan-2016

223 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Managerial Ethics & Corporate

Social Responsibility

Page 2: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

A Case for Companies to be Socially Responsible

• A company is a corporate citizen—it should act as a responsible citizen

• Improves a company’s reputation• Companies should solve the problems they cause• Example—pollution• Keeps the government out of business• Increased market share

Page 3: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

A Case Against Companies being Socially Responsible

• Increases costs• A company’s job is to make a good or service, not

improve society• Stealing shareholders’ money• A company’s social obligations are discharged

when it pays taxes• Gives company’s too much power• Businesses may exert too much influence over

charitable causes

Page 4: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Ethics

• The code of moral principles and values that govern the behaviors of a person or group with respect to what is right or wrong.

Page 5: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Ethical Dilemma

• A situation that arises when all alternative choices or behaviors have been deemed undesirable.

• Potentially negative ethical consequences, making it difficult to distinguish right from wrong.

Page 6: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Criteria for Ethical Decision Making

• Most ethical dilemmas involve A conflict between needs of the part & whole. The individual versus the organization. The organization versus society as a whole.

Page 7: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Four Considerations inEthical Decision Making

Utilitarian Approach Individualism Approach Moral-Rights ApproachJustice Approach

Page 8: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Utilitarian Approach

Moral behavior produces the greatest good for the greatest number.

Computations can be very complex, simplifying them is considered appropriate.

Critics fear a “Big Brother” approach and ask if the common good is squeezing the life out of the individual.

Page 9: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Individualism Approach

Acts are moral when they promote the individual's best long-term interests.

Individual self-direction paramount.

Individualism is believed to lead to honesty & integrity since that works best in the long run.

Page 10: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Moral-Rights Approach

• Asserts human beings have fundamental rights and liberties.

• Moral decisions are those that best maintain the rights of those people affected by them.

• An ethical decision is one that avoids interfering with the fundamental rights of others.

Page 11: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

“Moral Rights” Considerations

The right of free consentThe right of free consent

The right to privacyThe right to privacy

The right of freedom of conscienceThe right of freedom of conscience

The right of free speechThe right of free speech

The right to due processThe right to due process

The right to life & safetyThe right to life & safety

Page 12: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Justice Approach

• Moral Decisions must be based on standards of equity, fairness, and impartiality.

• Treatment of individuals should not be based on arbitrary characteristics.

• Closet thinking to codified law.

Page 13: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Levels of Moral Development

SOURCES: Based on L. Kahlberg, “Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach, in Moral Development and Behavior: Theory, Research, and Social Issues, ed. T. Lickona (New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1976), 31-53; and Jill W. Graham, “Leadership, Moral Development and Citizenship Behavior,” Business Ethics Quarterly 5, no. 1 (January 1995), 43-54.

Page 14: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Cultural Impact Questions

Identify the organizations heroes. What are some important organizational rituals? What are the ethical messages sent to new entrants into the

organization, must they obey authority at all costs? Does analysis of organizational stories and myths reveal

individuals who stand up for what is right, or is conformity the valued characteristic?

Does language exist for discussing ethical concerns? What informal socialization process exist?

SOURCE: Linda Klebe Trevino, “A Cultural Perspective on Changing and Developing Organizational Ethics,” in Research in Organizational Change and Development , ed. R. Woodman and W. Pasmore (Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press, 1990), 4.

Page 15: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Social Responsibility

• Organization’s obligation to make choices and take actions that will contribute to the welfare and interests of society and organization.

• Distinguishing right from wrong.• Being a good corporate citizen.Many social responsibilities issues are ambiguous

with respect to right and wrong.

Page 16: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Shades of Corporate Green

Activist Approach

Actively conserve the environment

Stakeholder Approach

Address multiple stakeholder concerns

Market Approach

Respond to customers

Legal Approach

Satisfy legal requirements regarding environmental conservation

SOURCE: Based on R.E. Freeman, J. Pierce, and R. Dodd, Shades of Green: Ethics and the Environment (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).

Page 17: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Total Corporate Social Responsibility

SOURCES: Based on Archie B. Carroll, “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance,” Academy of Management Review 4(1979), 499; and “The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Corporate Stakeholders,” Business Horizons 34 (July-August 1991), 42.

Page 18: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Corporate Responses toSocial Demands

Proactive

Take social initiatives.

Proactive

Take social initiatives.

Accommodation

Accept ethical responsibility.

Accommodation

Accept ethical responsibility.

Defense

Do only what is legally required.

Defense

Do only what is legally required.

Obstruction

Fight all the way.

Obstruction

Fight all the way.

High

Low

Degree of Social

Responsibility

Page 19: Managerial Ethics & Corporate Social Responsibility

Three Pillars of an Ethical Organization

SOURCE: Adapted from Linda Klebe Trevino, Laura Pincus Hartman, and Michael Brown, “Moral Person and Moral Manager,” California Management Review 42, No. 4 (Summer 2000), 128-142.