Main Streams of Life (MSL) - Wetland PA

Programme 生命主流化－加强湿地保护体系项目

Midori Paxton

Regional Technical AdviserEcosystems and Biodiversity

Energy and Environment Group

Outline主要内容 1. Overview of the CBPF-MSL Programme中国生物多样性伙伴关系框架－生命主流化项目 (CBPF-MSL) 简介2. Project Preparation Grant (PPG) Phase项目文件编制阶段（ PPG ） 3. Technical Requirements for the Formulation of Final Project Documents 项目最终文件编制技术要求

GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY -GEF- 全球环境基金

Global financing mechanisms for multilateralenvironmental agreements – e.g. CBD, UNFCCC多边环境公约全球资金机制－例如，生物多样性公约、联合国气候变化框架公约GEF-5 Replenishment – US$ 4.248 b.第 5 增资期－ 42.48 亿美元STAR Allocation for China 资源透明分配体制共分配给中国 2.1169 亿美元Total: $ 211.69 million

- US$ 149.6 million for CC 气候变化- US$ 52.67 million for BD 生物多样性- US$ 9.42 million for LD 土地退化

China’s PA Network and Wetlands中国保护地网络与湿地 > 2,500 NRs 2500 多个自然保护区 553 “wetland NRs” 92 national 553 个湿地自然保护区，其中， 92个为国家级 37 Ramsar sites 37 个国际重要湿地 Majority of NRs administered by

the SFA 大多数自然保护区由国家林业局主管 Other NR agencies – MEP, MLR,

MOA and SOA - >10 其他自然保护区管理机构包括环保部、国土资源部、农业部和国家海洋局等 10 余家 National, provincial, municipal &

county NRs 自然保护区按保护等级可分为国家级、省级、县市级 Regulation on Nature Reserve

Management (1994) 《 自然保护区管理条例》（ 1994 ）

Main Stream of Life (MSL) 生命主流化 Wetland PA Strengthening Programme 加强湿地保护体系项目

under the CBPF Objective: Catalysing the Sustainability of National Protected Area System for Conservation of Globally Significant Wetland Biodiversity目标：加强中国保护地体系，保护具全球重要性的湿地生物多样性 1+6 US$ 26 million 1 国家级项目＋ 6 个省级项目2600 万美元Lessons: 经验• Site level intervention not sustainable ；项目点的介入不可持续• higher level issues; 更高层次的问题• GEF – system focus ＧＥＦ－注重系统

Guiding Principles and Features指导原则与特点 Ensuring linkages and concerted impacts确保联动和影响一致 Three-tier Approach -

Provincial level projects to ensure capacity development on the ground / demonstration

三级方法－省级层面的项目为实地能力建设示范项目提供保障

Guiding Principles and Features指导原则与特点Cost effectiveness : 成本效益

- System Focus 侧重于整个体系 - Catalysing sustainability 加强整个保护地体系的可持续性

of PA system as a whole

Cross-fertilisation between projects

项目间互相借鉴

Programme OutcomesComponent 1: Systemic and Institutional Capacity at National and Provincial

Level

• Effective governance and legal framework for the national wetland PA sub-system

METT Approved national systems plan for wetlands New PA categories suited for wetland protection exclusive jurisdiction of SFA over core zone of NNR for conservation purposes

• Coverage of natural wetlands 50.3% to 55% (+1.7 million ha)• BHI in place; higher budget, technical capacity and up-to-date

information and data to be channelled quickly to wetland PAs improving management effectiveness.

• Improved protection of threatened species e.g. Chinese beaver, moose, Yangtze crocodile, finless porpoise and red-crowned crane etc.) through increase in coverage and mgt effectiveness

Programme OutcomesComponent 2: Mainstreaming Wetland PAs

• National PA system management mainstreamed within national and provincial development planning framework - 13th 5-year plan and sectoral plans, PA mgt standards

• Safeguards from sector practices in and near wetland PAs in the long term reducing pressures on biodiversity from agricultural; industrial and mining-related pollution; IAS threat; habitat change including water related disturbances from dams

• Increased national and provincial governmental budget allocations: an increase of >50% over baseline amount of $300 million/per year.

• Reduction of funding gap for model PA due to improved planning and budget allocation efficiencies; increased revenues; diversified funding sources and reduced cost from threat reduction at source etc.

Programme OutcomesComponent 3: Knowledge Mgt and Lessons Sharing

• Strengthened data sharing system: open access knowledge management platform, being routinely updated by wetland sites and used by planners and in EIA procedures, uptake of knowledge and replication of management practices from the provincial projects to similar types of wetland county wide (replication targets to be set during PPG)

• Improved understanding among decision makers and the public on value of wetlands and PA system: KAP survey

Project Development

Where we are CBPF-MSL Programme Framework Document and national level

project approved and included in the GEF November WP Altai PA network project (Xinjiang) PIF approved and included in

the February inter-sessional WP

Hainan, Daxing’anling, Honghu, Shenjinghu and Poyang Lake Project (FAO) PIFs approved and included in the June 2012 work programme.

All the PPGs submitted. 4 approved. US$ 577,615 US$ 127,125 (FAO) US$ 704,740

Consultants recruited

PPG Process and Timeline项目文件编制阶段流程和工作时间表 :

18

Draft ProDoc起草项目最终文件初稿Aug – Sept.

8 － 9 月

Gov. &UNDP review政府和联合国计划开发署评审

Project Submission to GEF SEC – Oct./Nov

Final Draft ProDoc & CEO Doc, BD-1 TT

Sept/Oct

CEO endorsed documentsDec/Jan, 2013

Signed Project document Feb 2013

UNDP Technical Clearance

10-day business standard

Project Re-submission to GEF SEC

Nov/Dec

GEF SEC Review

Project Initiation by May 2013

Info/data gathering,

consultation, assessments

May - July

Translation!

PPG Activities 项目文件编制活动 1. Systemic/ Institutional

Capacity 9. Feasibility

analysis and budget

2. Analysis of National dev. & sector planning

process

6. PA Info. & Data Mgt System

3. Wetland PA sub-system

Profiling

4. Economics component

design 7. Knowledge,

Attitude and Practice Survey, community

participation/gender assessment

8. Financing needs, METT and PA site

profiling

5. Wetland BD Health

Index

CEO Doc

BD-1TT

ProDoc

PPG Inputs项目文件编制专家配置

CEO Endorsement Request and Project Document项目文件批准申请与项目文件• Requires detailed baseline information and in-depth

analysis to make the case

• 需要详细的基线信息及深入的分析• Logframe – indicators, baseline values, targets, results

measurement methods must be established

• 逻辑框架—必须确定指标、基线值、目标、结果测量方法

CEO Endorsement Request and Project Document项目文件批准申请与项目文件• Business as-usual-scenario and incremental benefits

must be defined

• 必须确定常规结果及 GEF 基金投入后的增值结果• Global biodiversity benefits must be elaborated and

concretised.• 详细具体地分析项目点的生物多样性的全球重要性

PART I: Situation analysis – context & global significance , threats, long-term solution, stakeholder analysis, baseline analysis

第 1 部分：现状分析－背景与全球重要性，威胁，长期解决方案，利益相关者分析，基线分析 PART II: Strategy – project rationale and policy conformity, Goal, objective,

outcomes and outputs, outcome indicators, risks and assumptions, country ownership, sustainability, reliability

第 2 部分：策略－项目立项理由，政策可行、大目标、小目标、 成果与产出、成果指标、风险分析及分析前提、国家支持、可持续 性，可靠性 PART III: Mgt Arrangement

第 3 部分：项目管理

UNDP Project Document联合国开发计划署项目文件

PART IV: M&E Plan

第 4 部分：监测评估计划 Strategic Results Framework

战略成果框架 Incremental Cost Analysis

增值成本分析 Budget and Workplan

预算与工作计划 Additional Information - Co-financing letters, PA profile, community profile,

ToRs

其他信息：配套资金确认函、保护地概况、当地社区概况、工作任务书（ ToRs)

UNDP Project Document联合国开发计划署项目文件

CEO Endorsement Request 项目文件批准申请

• Most of ProDoc elements Project Framework 包括项目最终文件的主要部分，项目框架

• Financial summary tables 资金汇总表• Explanation re. alignment with

original PIF 与项目确认书一致• Response to GEF SEC, STAP and

Council comments回复 GEF秘书处、科学技术顾问组及成员国的问题 • PPG implementation report 项目文件编制实施报告

Annexes & GEF BD-1 Tracking Tools附录与 GEF 生物多样性－ 1跟踪工具 • METT 管理有效性跟踪工具• Financial Sustainability Scorecard 资金可持续性记分卡• Capacity Development Scorecard 能力建设记分卡Data Sheet 1: Reporting Progress at Protected Area Sites

Please indicate your answer here Notes

Data Sheet 1: Reporting Progress at Protected Area SitesPlease indicate your answer

here Notes

Name, affiliation and contact details for person responsible for completing the METT (email etc.)

Zhang Dehai(Dupty director of the PA)

Date assessment carried out Oct . 15, 2010 Month DD, YYYY (e.g., May 12, 2010)

Name of protected area Qinghai Sanjiangyuan

National Nature Reserve WDPA site code (these codes can be found on www.unep-wcmc.org/wdpa/)

Designations(please choose 1-3) 1 1: National2: IUCN Category3: International (please complete lines 35-69 as necessary )

Country China Location of protected area (province and if possible map reference) Qinghai Province

Date of establishment

2,003

Ownership details (please choose 1-4) 1 1: State2: Private3: Community4: Other

Management Authority Qinghai Sanjingyuan NR

Management Bureau Size of protected area (ha) 152300 Km2 Number of Permanent staff 13 Number of Temporary staff

Annual budget (US$) for recurrent (operational) funds – excluding staff salary costs 80,000US$ Annual budget (US$) for project or other supplementary funds – excluding staff salary

costs 700,000US$

What are the main values for which the area is designated Wetland protection and biodiversity conservation

List the two primary protected area management objectives in below: Management objective 1 Wetland protection Management objective 2 Biodiversity protection

No. of people involved in completing assessment 5

Including: (please choose 1-8) 2

1: PA manager 2: PA staff3: Other PA agency staff 4: Donors 5: NGOs 6: External experts 7: Local community 8: Other

Information on International Designations Please indicate your answer

here

UNESCO World Heritage site (see: whc.unesco.org/en/list) Date ListedSite nameSite area

Geographical co-ordinates

Criteria for designation (i.e. criteria i to x)Statement of Outstanding Universal Value

Ramsar site (see: www.wetlands.org/RSDB/)Date Listed Dec 7,2004 Site name Erling Lake and Zhaling Lake Site area 55,600 ha/64,720 ha

Geographical number E97°02′-97°55′ ,N34°48′-

35°01′

Reason for Designation (see Ramsar Information Sheet)

Important site of Black-necked Cranes, other birds

and endemic fish

Tracking Tool for Biodiversity Projects in GEF-3, GEF-4, and GEF-5

SECTION II: Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool for Protected Areas

Note: Please complete the management effectiveness tracking tool for EACH protected area that is the target of the GEF intervention.Structure and content of the Tracking Tool - Objective 1. Section II:The Tracking Tool has two main sections: datasheets and assessment form. Both sections should be completed.1. Datasheets: the data sheet comprises of two separate sections: Data sheet 1: records details of the assessment and some basic information about the site, such as name, size and location etc. Data sheet 2: provides a generic list of threats which protected areas can face. On this data sheet the assessors are asked to identify threats and rank their impact on the protected area.2. Assessment Form: the assessment is structured around 30 questions presented in table format which includes three columns for recording details of the assessment, all of which should be completed.

Objective 1: Catalyzing Sustainability of Protected Area Systems

Important: Please read the Guidelines posted on the GEF website before entering your data

Things to bear in mind….. 请切记• Strong team leader and tight teamwork• 项目组长卓越的领导能力和紧密的团队合作• Knowing what information/data/analysis are required in each

section from the beginning在项目文件编制之前即清楚地知道项目文件各部分的编写需要哪些信息 / 数据 , 及应进行何种分析• Project design is in PIF – add flesh to the skeleton 项目框架就是项目确认表（ PIF)—用详细的数据丰富项目框架 • Define clear baseline and targets 明确基线和目标• Full consultation and identification of local champions • 找出当地“领袖人物”，并全面征求他们的意见• Implementable plan with sufficient guidance – e.g. build on

baseline activities, detailed local information, full ToR, results measurement methods etc. 详细的实施计划－这一计划是以现有的活动、详细的当地信息、详尽的工作内容、结果评估方法等为依据的

Thank You!

谢谢