macarthur foundation juvenile justice grantmaking background and history the macarthur research...
TRANSCRIPT
MacArthur Foundation
Juvenile Justice Grantmaking
Background and History
The MacArthur Research Network onAdolescent Development and Juvenile Justice
Models for Change:
Systems Reform in Juvenile Justice
MacArthur Foundation Research Network on Adolescent Development and Juvenile JusticeLong-Term Goals
To improve decision-making in the juvenile and criminal
justice systems with better and more complete knowledge
about adolescent development
To improve court and corrections practices affecting
youthful offenders
To inform policy debates about the appropriate treatment of
juvenile offenders and the future of juvenile justice
To inform the public discussion about juvenile crime
Focal Issues
Adjudicative competence of adolescents in the
Juvenile
and Criminal Justice systems
Actual and perceived criminal culpability of youth
Risk, amenability, and desistance among serious
juvenile offenders
The goal is to create
a new wave of juvenile justice reform
by producing system-wide change
in multiple states
that others will learn from
and emulate.
National Resource Bank
Center for Children’s Law and Policy Child Welfare League of America Coalition for Juvenile Justice Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators Justice Policy Institute Juvenile Law Center National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice National Council of La Raza National Juvenile Defender Center National Mental Health Association National Youth Screening Assistance Project
Pennsylvania — 2004
Lead entity –
Juvenile Law Center
Targeted areas of improvement (TAI)
Mental health-juvenile justice
coordination
Aftercare
Disproportionate minority contact (DMC)
Strengths, assets, and risks
Pennsylvania Pilot Counties and Targeted Areas of Improvement
ILLINOIS — 2005
Lead entity –
Loyola University Chicago and coordinating council
Targeted areas of improvement (TAI) Community-based alternative sanctions and services Juvenile court jurisdiction Disproportionate minority contact (DMC)
Strengths, assets, and risks
The Children’s Home Association of Illinois
DuPage County Juvenile Justice Council
The 2nd Judicial Circuit: Crawford, Edwards, Franklin, Gallatin, Hamilton, Hardin, Jefferson, Lawrence, Richland, Wabash, Wayne, and White counties
Youth Outreach Services/Cook County Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative
Ogle County Probation Department
LOUISIANA — 2006
Lead entity –
Louisiana Board of Regents
Targeted areas of improvement (TAI) Alternatives to formal processing and
secure confinement Evidence-based practice Disproportionate minority contact (DMC)
Strengths, assets, and risks
WASHINGTON — 2006
Lead entity — Center for Children and Youth Justice
Possible targeted areas of improvement (TAI) Mental health Systems integration Indigent defense bar Diversion Status offenders Disproportionate minority contact (DMC)
Strengths, assets, and risks
Five Vital Signs
1. Fairness – measured by reduced racial disparities and access
to qualified counsel
2. Recognition of Juvenile-Adult Differences – measured by reduced
transfer to adult criminal court
3. Successful Engagement – measured by increased participation
in education, rehabilitation, and treatment services
4. Community Safety – measured by lower recidivism rates
5. Diversion – measured by reduced reliance on incarceration as
well
as increased use of community-based alternative sanctions
Advancing the Models
Building an evidence baseSelect bellwether statesDevelop and test tools to support reformDocument, assess and understand the process of changeCreate new knowledge
Creating interest and demandUnderstand how innovation travels through information and technical assistanceEstablish issue networks on DMC and mental health