MAKING PRAGUE TRANSPORT GREENER BY

2025

Carole Dao Tim Konrad

Harry Pannenbecker Pavel Hanák

Jiří Urban

2

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

VISION

E-mobility project should help with solution of following issues in Prague:

Emmission reduction

Noise pollution reduction

Traffic congestion reduction

9.9

.20

11

3

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

OUTLINE

1. Current situation in Prague2. Technology and trends3. E-mobility in other cities4. Greener public transport5. Conclusion

9.9

.20

11

CURRENT SITUATION IN PRAGUE

5

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

CURRENT SITUATION IN PRAGUE

Political will to introduce subsidies for e-mobility Support of pilot projects Incentive program from EU – 2012

Problem of traffic jams in city centre

Public transport system based on Electric-powered: subway + tram lines Diesel-powered: Bus lines

Relatively high air pollution

9.9

.20

11

6

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

CURRENT SITUATION IN PRAGUE

9.9

.20

11

Brussels Berlin Rotterdam Zurich Oslo Salzburg Prague Paris London20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100Pollution Index (9/2011)

Source: http://www.airpollution.eu

7

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

CURRENT PROJECTS IN PRAGUE

3 projects running already Supported by two companies – ČEZ a.s. and PRE

a.s.

ČEZ FutureMotion - eMobility Around 20 charging stations More than 30 at the end of 2011 The fastest growing project Free charging till Jan 2012

9.9

.20

11

8

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

CURRENT PROJECTS IN PRAGUE

PRE ePoints 8 charging places in Prague Testing two types of e-cars

Praha-Elektromobilni.cz 10 charging places (1 fast-charge) Infrastructure by PRE and TILI

9.9

.20

11

TECHNOLOGY AND TRENDS

10

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

E-TECHNOLOGY HAS JUST BEEN BORN

9.9

.20

11

11

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

GOOD REASONS FOR OPTIMISM

Factor Definition E-Mobility

Relative Advantage

Improvement over previous

generation

no emissions (+)low noise level (+/-)

small distances only (-)high price (-)

long charging time (-)few charging stations (-)different standards (-)

Compatibility Fit with people‘s lives

strong environmental awareness (+)

practical for city-people (+)

Complexity/Simplicity

Ease of use almost no difference with conventional vehicles (+)

Trialability Opportunity to experiment

hardly available (-)

Observability Visibility to others

everyone will see it (+)

9.9

.20

11

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

12

TRENDS: INDUSTRY IS TAKING OFF

Economy: Uncertainty of Oil supply and prices Environment: need for reduction of emissions

and noise Social: Environmental Awareness Government: Emergence of global climate

change policies EU: Green Car Initiative China: $15 bn in 10 yrs (with D)

Technology: Industry increases its efforts Many car manufacturers moving in market Batteries improving China: largest producer scale economies

9.9

.20

11

13

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

DON‘T UNDERESTIMATE PROGRESS

9.9

.20

11

E-MOBILITY IN OTHER CITIES

15

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

TRENDS IN OTHER COUNTRIES

In the US Tax incentives Depends on the battery size

In Europe Based on carbon emissions

9.9

.20

11

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

16

EXAMPLES FROM OTHER COUNTRIES

France - Paris Political Ambition:

Autolib’ Project Infrastructure:

Hundreds of charging stations by 2012

Incentives: 400€ for motorbikes 20% towards the cost

of the EV (max 5.000 €)

United Kingdom Political Ambition:

100.000 EV as soon as possible

Infrastructure: 250 charging stations

– 25.000 by 2015 Incentives:

25% towards the cost of the Ecar (max 5.000£)

9.9

.20

11

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

17

NUMBER OF CHARGING STATIONS

Paris London

9.9

.20

11

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

18

EXAMPLES FROM OTHER COUNTRIES

Spain – Madrid Political Ambition:

the Movele Project Infrastructures:

30 charging stations – 280 by 2012

Incentives: 75% discount on the

municipal tax of circulation

The Netherlands – Amsterdam Political Ambition:

10.000 EV by 2015 and 100% EV by 2040

Infrastructures: 1.000 charging

stations by 2012 Incentives:

cheap car parks dedicated to EV

9.9

.20

11

19

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

RECOMMENDATION

What can Prague learn from the others’ experience?

Create a network among cities to share experiences and identify best practices

9.9

.20

11

20

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

THE NETWORK IS ALREADY MOVING9

.9.2

01

1

GREENER PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN PRAGUE

22

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

PRAGUE PUBLIC TRANSPORT STATISTICS

 subway trams buses total

number of lines3 24 150 177

lenght of lines (km)59 548 1 815 2 422

number of vehicles(carriages)

720 988 1110 2 818

number of persons transported per year (in thousands)

584 880 349 286 302 307 1 236 473

source: DP Prague

9.9

.20

11

23

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

ALTERNATIVE FUELS CONSIDERED

Diesel

Hybrid diesel (plug-in hybrid EV‘s)

CNG

Trolleybus

E-bus

9.9

.20

11

24

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

9.9

.20

11

Established in 1990 494 buses sold in 2010 Revenues in 2010: 2 082 milion CZK (85 mil.

€)

25

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

INVESTMENT COSTS ANALYSIS

Initial investment

  total price in CZK (EUR) per km (CZK) scale

diesel4 300 000 CZK (175

510) 5,38 100%

hybrid diesel5 800 000 CZK (236

735) 7,25 135%

CNG5 500 000 CZK (224

490) 6,875 128%

trolleybus8 000 000 CZK (326

530) 10 187%

e-bus7 800 000 CZK (318

367) 9,75 181%

source: SOR

9.9

.20

11

26

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

OPERATION COSTS ANALYSIS

Operation costs

  per 100km CZK/km scale

diesel 30 - 32 (l) 7,4 - 7,8 100%

hybrid diesel 24 - 25,6 (l) 5,9 -6,3 80%

CNG 39 - 41 (kg) 5,4 - 5,7 73%

trolleybus 90 - 110 (kWh) 4,1 - 4,4 56%

e-bus 80 - 100 (kWh) 2,7 - 2,9 37%

source: SOR

9.9

.20

11

27

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

SERVICE COSTS ANALYSIS

Service costs analysis

  per km per km scale

diesel 4,8 - 4,9 - 100%

hybrid diesel 5,6 - 5,7 - 116%

CNG 7,8 - 8,5 - 168%

trolleybus 7,0 - 8,0 2,55 207%

e-bus 4,0 - 4,1 2,37+0,31 139%

source: SOR

9.9

.20

11

28

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

TOTAL COSTS ANALYSIS

Total costs

  per km (CZK) scale

diesel 17,58 - 18,08 100%

hybrid diesel 18,75 - 19,25 107%

CNG 20,075 - 21,075 115%

trolleybus 23,65 - 24,95 136%

e-bus 19,13 - 19,43 108%

source: SOR

9.9

.20

11

CONCLUSION

30

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

CONCLUSION

Prague is in the pilot phase

Promising trends

Prague is lagging behind...

..., but greening Prague’s bus transport system could be a major leap forward

Favorable effects: environment, jobs, attractiveness

9.9

.20

11

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!

32

CEM

S B

lock

Sem

inar

SOURCES http://www.hybrid.cz/blizi-se-mobility-forum-2011 http://www.praha.eu/jnp/cz/home/doprava_v_praze/den_elektromobility_

ukaze_silu_elektriny.html http://www.dpp.cz/dp-v-datech/ http://www.going-electric.org/docs/postion-paper/100521-going-electric-

avere-car-industry-competitiveness.pdf http://www.sor.cz/site/index.php http://www.futuremotion.cz/emobility/ http://www.energetickyporadce.cz/e-mobilita/projekty-pre.html http://www.airqualitynow.eu/ http://www.going-electric.org/ http://www.greenemotion-project.eu/ http://www.espacemobelec.fr/ http://www.iea.org/ http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/transport/green-transport/electric-

vehicles http://www.greenemotion-project.eu/about-us/index.php http://www.prtm.com/uploadedFiles/Thought_Leadership/Articles/External

_Articles/The_China_New_Energy_Vehicles_Program_.pdf

9.9

.20

11