lower big blue watershed draft escherichia coli (e. coli) tmdl stakeholder meeting may 7, 2014
TRANSCRIPT
Lower Big Blue WatershedDraft Escherichia coli (E. coli) TMDL
Stakeholder Meeting
May 7, 2014
Agenda
• Watershed Overview
• Listing Information
• Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Allocations
• Implementation
• Schedule
Watershed Overview• Watershed Size• Watershed Location• Lower Big Blue Subwatersheds• General Watershed Land Use
Watershed Overview
County area– 19.14% in Hancock– 5.10% in Henry– 1.81% in Johnson– 29.42% in Rush– 44.35% in Shelby
Municipalities– Shelbyville– Shirley– Morristown– Edinburgh
Drains approximately 280 square miles
• Subwatersheds– Headwaters Little Blue River– Beaver Meadow Creek– Gilson Creek- Little Blue River– Manilla Branch- Little Blue River– Town of Rays Crossing- Little Blue River– Headwaters Six Mile Creek– Anthony Creek- Six Mile Creek– Nameless Creek– Prairie Branch- Big Blue River– Foreman Branch- Big Blue River– DePrez Ditch- Big Blue River– Shaw Ditch- Big Blue River
Land Use
Land Use
Watershed
Area
PercentAcresSquare Miles
Open Water730.34 1.14 0.41
Developed Land13,656.60 21.34 7.61
Forested Land12,424.31 19.41 6.93
Grasslands and Shrubs1,649.28 2.58 0.92
Pasture/Hay6,789.05 10.61 3.79
Agricultural Lands14,3430.22 224.11 80.01
Wetlands592.02 0.93 0.33
TOTAL17,9271.82 280.11 100.00
Listing InformationLower Big Blue Watershed
Definition of a TMDL
• Clean Water Act requires that a TMDL be allocated as follows:– TMDL = WLA + LA + MOS– Wasteload allocations (WLA) for “point sources”
(regulated under NPDES)– Load allocations (LA) for nonpoint sources and
natural background– MOS for margin of safety
Water Quality StandardsEscherichia coli (E. coli)
April 1 through October 31, E. coli shall not exceed 125 colony forming units (cfu) per 100 milliliters (mL) as a geometric mean based on not less than 5 samples equally spaced over a 30-day period nor exceed 235 cfu per 100 mL in any 1 sample in a 30-day period
• Impaired Segments-72 Miles E. coli-15 Miles PCB Fish Tissue-8 Miles Total Mercury
• TMDL only addresses E. coli
Assessment of Water Quality
2012 listings reassessed – E. coli sampling performed by IDEM in 2010
• 21 sites for E. coli• Sampled 5 consecutive weeks
– September 20, 2010 – October 18, 2010
– 2013 East Fork White River sampling• 2 sites sampled in Lower Big Blue River watershed
– July 16, 2013- August 13, 2013
Site #
L-Site # Stream Name Road Name
1 WED020-0031 Sixmile Creek CR 1050 E
2 WED020-0032 Dilly Creek CR 200 S
3 WED020-0033 Nameless Creek CR 400 S
4 WED020-0001 Sixmile Creek CR 800 E
5 WED030-0029 Little Blue River CR 150 W
6 WED030-0030 Little Blue River CR 300 N
7 WED030-0031 Beaver Meadow Cr CR 100 N
8 WED030-0026 Little Blue River CR 400 N
9 WED030-0032Tributary of Little Blue
RiverUnion Rd
10 WED030-0033 Little Blue River CR 200 N
11 WED020-0014 Foremans Branch Knighthood Grove Rd
12 WED020-0003 Big Blue River Morristown Rd
13 WED-02-0001 Little Blue River Franklin St
14 WED-08-0002 Big Blue River Noble St
15 WED-08-0003 Big Blue River CR 575 E
16 WED-08-0001 Big Blue River CR 100 S
17 WED050-0033 Howell Ditch Manetta Rd
18 WED050-0008 Big Blue River CR 550 S
20 WED050-0035 Big Blue River SR 252
21 WED-02-0003 Little Blue River CR 400 W
22 WED-08-0004 Sixmile Creek CR 900 E
E. coli Data• IDEM sampled in 2010, 2013• Geometric mean calculated for each
site– 7 sites reported meeting the
standard in 2010– 14 sites reported not meeting
the standard in 2010– 2 sites reported not meeting the
standard in 2013
• Highest geometric mean = 1215.7– Site 21
• Lowest geometric mean = 30.16– Site 1
• Highest single sample = 2419.6– Sites 3, 10
• Lowest single sample = 10.8– Site 1
E. coli Data
• Impaired Segments-256 Miles E. coli-15 Miles PCB Fish Tissue-8 Miles Total Mercury
• TMDL only addresses E. coli
TMDL Allocations
Lower Big Blue River Sources of E. coliPoint Sources• Municipal NPDES Permits
– 5 permitted WWTPs
• MS4 Permits– 2 permitted MS4s
Nonpoint Sources• Land use Practices: Agricultural, Forested, Urban• Wildlife• CFOs
– 12 permitted CFOs
• Septic Systems
Point Sources• Municipal NPDES Permits
– IN0031593- Eastern Hancock Jr/Sr High School
– IN0024503- Shirley WWTP– IN0023841- Morristown WWTP– IN0032867- Shelbyville WWTP– IN0020184- Edinburgh WWTP
• MS4 Permit– INR040051- Shelbyville– INR040026- Edinburgh
Nonpoint Sources• Land Use Practices
– Agricultural– Forested– Urban
• CFOs– 184- David Vanosdol– 637- Janes Brothers– 1901- SSZ Enterprises– 2208- Jarrod Law and Michael Pauszek– 2950- Ronald Sullivan– 4448- Jeff and Bruce Muegge– 4623- Bob White Farm– 1939- Signature Farms Morristown– 2581- Lewis Pork Farm LLC– 4909- William E. Smith Farm 3– 6435- J & J Livestock LLC– 6582- Pork in Blue River LLC
• Septic Systems• Tile Drains• Wildlife
Lower Big Blue River TMDL AllocationsLoad Allocations
– Agricultural Run-off– Failing Septic Systems– Livestock– Tile Drains– Urban Run-off– Wildlife– Forested
Precipitation
• Many sources of pollution are impacted by precipitation
• A path for pollutant to enter a waterbody is through rain and snow melt
• Information on precipitation used with the Load Duration Curve will give a better overall sense of flow conditions in stream
Flow
• The long history of flow gages provides a valuable tool in evaluating water quality data
• USGS flow gages provide a consistent high quality source of flow information
• The large network of flow gages means that finding a representative flow gage is possible
Upstream Downstream
Load Reductions NeededHUC 12 Minimum
[CFU/100mL]Maximum
[CFU/100mL]Geometric Mean
[CFU/100mL]% Reduction to meet WQS
Headwaters Little Blue River 29.2 1986.6 141.12 11.42
Beaver Meadow Creek 95.9 435.2 148.73 15.96
Gilson Creek- Little Blue River 22.6 2419.6 > 1215.77 0
Manilla Branch- Little Blue River 28.8 325.5 118.93 0
Town of Rays Crossing- Little Blue River 28.8 1553.1 360.57 65.33
Headwaters Six Mile Creek 10.8 77.6 30.16 0
Anthony Creek- Six Mile Creek 57.1 1732.9 380.65 62.51
Nameless Creek 104.6 2419.6 > 460.27 72.84
Praire Branch- Big Blue River 146.7 435.2 281.24 55.55
Foreman Branch- Big Blue River 37.7 1119.9 191.56 34.75
DePrez Ditch- Big Blue River 60.9 214.2 130.92 4.52
Shaw Ditch- Big Blue River 71.2 146.7 114.2 0
Implementation
Implementation• Implementation of TMDL expected to occur
via ongoing and new watershed management activities:– Outreach, education, and training– Agricultural conservation practices– Urban storm water management– Control of failing septic systems– Forestry BMPs
Potential Priority Implementation AreasSubwatershed
PPIA Rank
Load reduction(Billion MPN/Day
% Reduction Implementation Strategies
DePrez Ditch-Big Blue River 1 42.76 93.24%
Outreach, Education, and TrainingStream Fencing
Storm water planning and managementCover Crops
Manure handling, storage, treatment, and disposalConservation tillage/ residue management
Grassed WaterwaysPrescribed Grazing
Septic System EducationConservation Easements
Comprehensive Nutrient Management PlansConstructed WetlandsHeavy Use Area Pads
Pasture and Hay PlantingConservation Crop Rotation
Riparian BuffersFilter Strips
Precision Agriculture
Prairie Branch-Big Blue River 2 22.43 51.59%
Anthony Creek-Six Mile Creek 3 7.73 64.69%
Town of Rays Crossing-Little Blue River
4 5.60 72.07%
Nameless Creek 5 4.39 72.80%
Manilla Branch-Little Blue River 6 1.87 45.17%
Beaver Meadow Creek 7 0.32 16.24%
Headwaters Little Blue River 8 0.22 11.58%
Gilson Creek-Little Blue River 9 0 0
Headwaters Six Mile Creek 10 0 0
Shaw Ditch-Big Blue River 11 0 0
Foreman Branch-Big Blue River 12 0 0
Schedule
Lower Big Blue River TMDL Schedule
• Sampling Completed September 2010 and 2013
• Draft TMDL Meeting: May 7, 2013
• 30-Day Comment Period: May 7– June 6
– www.idem.in.gov/nps/3914.htm
– Final TMDL Report Submittal to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S.EPA): July 2014
TMDL Project ManagerCory Fischer
TMDL Project ManagerOffice of Water QualityIndiana Department of Environmental Management100 N. Senate Ave.Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2251
PH: (317) 308-3184FX: (317) 308-3219E MAIL: [email protected]/2347.htm