low-x meeting 2008 6-10 july 2008 held here don lincoln fermi national accelerator laboratory
DESCRIPTION
Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory for the DØ collaboration. Jet Physics at DØ. Inclusive Jet Cross-Section Photons & Jets W + charm. The Fermilab Tevatron. Highest-energy accelerator currently in operation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Low-x Meeting 20086-10 July 2008
Held here
Don LincolnFermi National Accelerator
Laboratory
for the DØ collaboration
Jet Physics at DØ
![Page 2: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
● Inclusive Jet Cross-Section
● Photons & Jets
● W + charm
![Page 3: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
The Fermilab Tevatron
82.32.5Interactions/ crossing
3963963500Bunch crossing (ns)
50173 Ldt (pb-1/week)
3 10329 10311.6 1030Peak L (cm-2s-1)
1.961.961.8s (TeV)
36 3636 366 6Bunches in Turn
Run IIbRun IIaRun I
Results based on ~0.7 - 1.0 fb-1
• Highest-energy accelerator currently in operation– only place where Top
quarks have been produced• Data delivered > 4.4 fb-1
– expect to reach 6 - 8 fb-1 by the end of the run.
![Page 4: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Quark and gluon density is described by PDFs.
Proton remnants form the Underlying Event (U.E.)
We compare to pQCD calculations to NLO ( )
Jet Production in pQCD
3s
Jets of particles originate from hard collisions between quark and gluons
fragmentation
partondistributio
n
partondistributio
n
Jet
Underlyingevent
Photon, W, Z etc.
Hard scattering
ISR FSR
p
p
![Page 5: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Jet Measurements at the Tevatron
D0 Run II jet results presented here use the
• Additional midpoint seeds between pairs of close jets improve IR safety• 4-vector sum scheme instead of sum ET• Split/merge after stable proto-jets found
• Jet Energy Scale: 2-3% at CDF 1-2% at D0 (after 7 years of hard work using MC tuned to data, +jet & dijet event balance)
• Energy Resolution: unsmearing procedure using /ET measured from dijet data.
Midpoint cone algorithm (R = 0.7)
Main Systematics to Jet Measurements
Compare data and theory at the “particle level”
![Page 6: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Jet Events at the Tevatron
Three jet event at D0
1st leading Jet (pT ~624 GeV)
2nd leading Jet (pT ~594 GeV)
3rd leading jet
Mjj = 1.22 TeV
DØCDF
(at HERA)
LHC
GeV)980(EGeV)980(EpTeV1.96sp
Complementary to HERA and fixed target experiments
DØ jet coverage || < 2.4 → very forward jets are available!
![Page 7: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
D0 calorimeter● Calorimeter is the most important
detector for jet measurements
● Liquid-Argon/Uranium calorimeter:– Stable response, good resolution– Partially compensating (e/ ~ 1)
● Gaps covered with scintillator tiles
● Calorimeter structure divides the measurement in three regions:
– Central calorimeter (easiest)
– Intercryostat region (challenging)
– End caps (fine segmentation)
![Page 8: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Inclusive cross section results● Largest data set from Run II
with the widest rapidity coverage (|y| < 2 .4) and smallest uncertainties to date
● Uncertainties competitive with (better than) Run I and CDF
● Jet spectrum presented at particle level with midpoint cone (Rcone = 0.7)
● Compared to next-to-leading order (NLO) theory with CTEQ6.5M PDFs and non-perturbative corrections from Pythia
![Page 9: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Comparison to theory● Comparing data and theory, the general tendency is to favor MRST2004
PDFs or the lower edge of CTEQ6.5 uncertainty ⇒ less high-x gluon● CTEQ6.5 reduced PDF uncertainties by ~×2 compared to CTEQ6.1
![Page 10: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Improvement since 2006● The uncertainties have improved by up to factor two and more in the
central region since preliminary JES (2006)● Forward regions not published before, but improvement over factor ten
![Page 11: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Final results● Good agreement between data and theory at all rapidities;
MRST2004 PDFs and the lower end of CTEQ6.5 PDF uncertainty favored
● Scale uncertainty in next-to-leading order (NLO) theory comparable to experimental uncertainty at low pT
![Page 12: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
DØ and CDF comparison● The DØ and CDF data
are compatible within uncertainties
● Note that the CTEQ6.1 PDF band in the CDF plot is twice as wide as the CTEQ6.5 PDF band in the DØ plot
● Central values of the theory slightly different
![Page 13: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Uncertainty correlations● Leading sources are from JES:
– EM energy scale (Z e+e- calibration)
– Photon energy scale (MC description of e / response, material budget)
– High pT extrapolation (fragmentation in Pythia/Herwig, PDFs)
– Rapidity decorrelation (uncertainty in -dependence)
– Detector showering (goodness of template fits)
● Only five highest out of 23 correlated systematics shown
![Page 14: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Inclusive Jets: Summary● Detailed inclusive jet cross section
measurement over eight orders of magnitude in range pT = 50—600 GeV with wide rapidity coverage (six bins in |y|<2.4)
● Good agreement with NLO pQCD calculations observed, with reduced high x gluon favored compared to CTEQ6.5M
● Uncertainty correlations studied in detail and correlations found to be high; 23+1 sources provided for global PDF fits
● Request from CTEQ and MRSW groups for data to be incorporated to global PDF fits
● [Re]submitted to PRL. Final acceptance imminent.
![Page 15: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Direct photons come unaltered from the hard sub-process Allows to understand hard scattering dynamics
ElectroMagnetic Shower Detection
Higher granularityEM detector
Preshower
EM Calorimeter
• EM shower with very little energy in hadronic calorimeter• Geometric isolation• No associated track• R(, Jet) > 0.7 (cone jets, R = 0.7)
Photon Identification
Background Estimation• Origins: Neutral mesons: o, + Instrumental: EM jets• Shower shape quantities in NN to estimate purity.
Photon Production
![Page 16: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
•Neural net based on shower shape variables used in distinguishing photon
•Purity estimated by fitting NN templates to data
•Systematic uncertainty includes varying fit range
Inclusive + X Production
![Page 17: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
D0 Collab., Phys. Lett. B 639, 151 (2006)
• Results consistent with NLO theory• pT dependence similar to former observations (UA2, CDF)
Measurements based on higher stats, ~3 fb-1 with ~300 GeV reach, coming soon
• Signal fraction is extracted from data fit to signal and background MC isolation-shape templates• Data-Theory agree to within ~20% within errors
Inclusive + X Production
![Page 18: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Also fragmentation:
Dominant production at low pT (< 120 GeV) is through Compton scattering: qg → q+
+ jet + X Event selection
• || < 1.0 (isolated)• pT > 30 GeV• |jet| < 0.8 (central), 1.5 < |jet| < 2.5 (forward)• pT
jet > 15 GeV 4 regions: g.jet>0,<0, central and forward jets• MET< 12.5 GeV + 0.36pT (cosmics, W → e)
Probe PDF's in the range 0.007 < x < 0.8 and pT
= 900 < Q2 < 1.6 x 105 GeV2
0804.1107 [hep-ex], [Re]submitted to PLB, very near acceptance
Inclusive + jets Production
![Page 19: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Neural net used to distinguish photons and determine photon purity
Inclusive + jets Production
![Page 20: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Cross section determined in four rapidity bins and over large Pt range
Inclusive + jets Production
![Page 21: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Inclusive + jets Production
• Similar pT dependence than inclusive photons in UA2, CDF, and D0 • Shapes very similar for all PDFs• Measurements cannot be simultaneously accommodated by the theory
• Most errors cancel in ratios between regions (3-9% across most pT
range)• Data & Theory agree qualitatively• A quantitative difference is observed in the central/forward ratios
Need improved and consistent theoretical description for + jet
![Page 22: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
W + c-jet Production
s (90%) or
d (10%)c
cW-
• W+c-jet is background to top pair, single top, Higgs.• It can signal the presence of new physics• Direct sensitivity to s-quark PDF
Data Selection•L = 1 fb-1
•W(l) isolated lepton pT>20 GeV, MET > 20 GeV
•|jet| < 2.5, pTjet > 20 GeV
•Muon-in-jet with opposite charge to W is a c-jet candidate
Systematic errors largely cancel in the ratio
Background•W + (light) jet •WZ, ZZ rarely produce charge correlated jets• tt, tb, W+bc and W+b suppresed (small x-sec)0802.2400 [hep-ex] Accepted to PLB – D0 Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 091803 (2008) - CDF
% difference in CTEQ vs MRST % uncertainty on the CTEQ6.5M set
![Page 23: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Results from We and W channels
● jet pT is corrected to the particle level ● measurement compared with the theory
– ALPGEN: for tree level matrix element calculation– PYTHIA: for parton shower – uncertainty due to CTEQ 6.5M PDFs is 6.6%
● both channels show consistent results
![Page 24: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
● integrated over all pT and all bins with |y| < 2.5
● no significant deviation from the theoretical prediction
● recently accepted by – Physics Letters B– arXiv:0803.2259v1 [hep-ex] – Fermilab-Pub-08/062-E
● CDF’s recently published result:– Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 091803
● jet pT is corrected to the particle level ● measurement compared with the
theory– ALPGEN: for tree level matrix element
calculation– PYTHIA: for parton shower – uncertainty due to CTEQ 6.5M PDFs is
6.6%
0.074 ± 0.019 (stat.) + 0.012 -0.014 (syst.)
Result
![Page 25: Low-x Meeting 2008 6-10 July 2008 Held here Don Lincoln Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory](https://reader035.vdocuments.mx/reader035/viewer/2022062816/568149df550346895db70703/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Summary
• The Tevatron experiments are entering the era of precision QCD measurements based on samples in excess of 1 fb-1
• Good agreement with pQCD within errors is observed for jet production measurements
• An improved and consistent theoretical description is needed for +jets
• W + charm production measurements are consistent with theoretical prediction
Several new results intended to be announcedat ICHEP. Stay tuned!