loeb & loeb adds value ©2013 loeb & loeb llp us & china patent differences mip china...

28
LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

Upload: madalyn-breese

Post on 16-Dec-2015

251 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

LOEB & LOEB Adds Value©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP

US & China Patent DifferencesMIP China Forum Conference

May 2, 2013

Page 2: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

2

SIPO Overview

SIPO – State Intellectual Property Office– Similar to USPTO– Government agency

– Exam patent applications

– Grant patents

Local branches of SIPO– Adjudicate patent disputes– Enforce judicial decisions in jurisdiction– Appeals to People’s Courts– Some Supreme People’s Courts on coasts with patent expertise

The IP tribunal of the Supreme People’s Court is responsible for judicial interpretations of Chinese Patent Law and its Implementing Regulations.

Page 3: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

3

USPTO Overview

USPTO– Exam patent applications– Grant patents

The USPTO does not adjudicate disputes– Federal courts are responsible for adjudicating patent disputes, enforcing

judgments, and hearing appeals

Page 4: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

4

Types of Chinese Patents

In China patent types include:– Invention patents– Utility model patents– Design patents

Invention patents– New technological developments

– Products, method, improvements thereon

– 20 year term from date of application   Utility and Design

– 10 year term

Page 5: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

5

Types of US Patents

US Utility patents – 20 years from date of application and encompass:– Machines– Human made products– Compositions of matter– Processing methods

US Design – 14 years from date of application

Page 6: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

6

China Utility Patents

China Utility patents– Have no counterpart in US law– There are no provisional patents in China

There are some similarities, which include:– Examiner review for formalities– If Examiner deems okay, patent in a year shorter term of 10 years

Have the ability to file an invention patent, which abandons the utility patent, but does not get priority date of invention patent

Page 7: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

7

Scope of Coverage

Scope of coverage– In the US, is virtually unlimited– Both, novel, inventive and useful

Page 8: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

8

China patent practice

No continuation practice

No best mode

China – strict exclusions– Scientific discoveries

– Rules and methods of mental activities

– Methods for diagnosis or treatment of diseases

– Animal and plant varieties (not including the processes used in producing the products)

– Substances obtained by means of nuclear transformation

Page 9: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

9

Novelty

Novelty

– Concept – show your idea, gauge interest before spending the money on a patent application

In the US – one year form date of public use, offer to sell of publication of invention

In China – no prior disclosure except in limited circumstance

Page 10: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

10

How to File in China

How to file in China?– File in China directly

– Domestic priority: 12 months for invention or utility

– File in the United States first– Then within 12 months file either PCT or file in China

– File PCT application designating China– 30 months to from first priority date– Can extend 2 months with a fee

Page 11: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

11

Revise Specification

Edit down– Reduce translation costs ($50-100 per page)

– More accurate translation

– Speed examination

– No best mode requirement

– Provide a list of prior art – let Examiner determine

Do not describe specific embodiments (limiting)

– Claim elements should be in all the embodiments and most drawings

Do not have to have all claimed element in drawings

Do not describe advantages (limiting)

– Enablement standard is lower

Page 12: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

12

Revise Claims

One independent claim (else restriction)

Consider claiming the advantage over the cited art (Jepson)

Directly cover infringer (contributory is difficult)

– Limited discovery

– Direct witness examination

Multiple dependent claims are fine

Reduce number

– Can get expensive

Page 13: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

13

China Applications in the US

Remove all references to “The Invention”– Coverage may only be to the one invention

Reduce summary– Remove problem/solution

– Shrink disclosure

Reduce abstract

Problem – solution approach may limit claims

Add more embodiments to avoid being limited to one

Claims– Remove all multiple dependencies

– Add more claim types (CRM, SYSTEM, METHOD)

– Numbering is OK, but not necessary

– Narrative claims should be converted

Page 14: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

14

Sample claim

Hydraulic piston with replaceable seal rings

– Outer casing housing a plurality of seal rings

– Seals against reciprocating and/or rotating polished rod to allow motion of the rod while maintaining fluid pressure

– Two part construction allows for replacement of seal rings

Page 15: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

15

Narrative claim

A sealing apparatus for a reciprocating polished rod comprising a seal having a

plurality of seal rings disposed between a first bushing and a second bushing, the seal

and the two bushings being placed within a channel in a body to which a cap is

releasably attached, such that upon connection of the cap to the body opposing mating

surfaces on the body and the cap compress the seal against the reciprocating polished

rod.

Page 16: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

16

Functional Apparatus Claim

A sealing apparatus for a reciprocating polished rod, comprising:

– a body for receiving the polished rod; and

– a seal for preventing leakage of a fluid alongside the polished rod by radial pressure of a plurality of seal rings that are compressed between a first bushing and a second bushing within the body when a cap is threaded onto one end of the body.

Page 17: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

17

Outline Form Claim

A sealing apparatus for a reciprocating polished rod, comprising:

– a body having a first end, a second end, a channel for receiving the polished rod, and a first mating surface formed on an interior surface of the body, wherein the first end is adapted for engagement with a well;

– a first bushing disposed within the channel and engaging the first mating surface;

– a plurality of seals disposed within the channel adjacent the first bushing;

– a second bushing disposed adjacent the plurality of seals; and

– a cap having an aperture for receiving the polished rod and defining a second mating surface, the cap being removably engaged with the second end of the body such that the second mating surface engages the second bushing.

Page 18: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

18

First to File

The Chinese Patent Law requires that patent applications directed to inventions made in china by Chinese entities or individuals must be filed first in China before any patent applications can be filed on the invention in foreign countries.

Page 19: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

19

Re-Issue

In the US, a re-issue is used to address errors that occurred without deceptive intent– Claiming less than entitled

In China, there is nothing similar

Page 20: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

20

Examination in China

First step: formality examination

– If OK, publish in 18 months from filing

Second step: examination

– Have to request within 3 years of filing or priority date, or else it is deemed withdrawn

– Can request an examination early for free

Page 21: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

21

Examination in the US

First step: formalities– If OK, publish in 18 months

Second Step: examination– Occurs automatically

– Added to the queue

– Can be moved up by paying a fee or by special circumstance

Page 22: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

22

Disclosure Requirements

In the US:– Enablement

– Best mode

– Written description

In China:– Similar, no best mode

Page 23: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

23

Enforcement in China

Administrative– Faster, less expensive

– No damages

– Limited injunctions

Judicial– Slower, more expensive

– Can get damages and injunctions

Page 24: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

24

Administrative - China

Local IP offices, customs offices and the police

Local IP

– Infringement, mediation, false representations

Customs

– Control importation and exportation of infringing items

Police – stop criminal activities

Page 25: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

25

Administrative – Start an Action?

Report to local IP office

Request an administrative investigation

– Work with police and conduct the administrative or seizure detain products

– If infringement established, remedies can be enforced (no damages)

Page 26: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

26

Judicial Enforcement in China

Civil and criminal

Trial – intermediate People’s Courts in capital city of each province

Appeals – high People’s Courts of the province

Supreme Court – discretion of court

Page 27: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

27

Invalidity – First at SIPO

Patent Re-Examination board at SIPO

File lawsuit to challenge ruling of board

The Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court is the court that has jurisdiction over the Patent Re-Examination Board, and all cases against the Board must be filed with the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court.

Page 28: LOEB & LOEB Adds Value ©2013 LOEB & LOEB LLP US & China Patent Differences MIP China Forum Conference May 2, 2013

28

Severe Infringement

Severe infringement – Criminal

– Prison and fines

Damages

– China – Insignificant

– Lost profits or benefits gained

– Royalty easier – get 1 to 3 times

– Still hard - $625 to $62,500 maximum