local single sky implementation lssip 2017 - turkey · 2019-02-18 · introduction the local single...
TRANSCRIPT
Level 1 - Implementation Overview
Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - TURKEY
EUROCONTROL
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey Released Issue
Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Turkey
Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/43
Date of Edition 04/06/18
LSSIP Focal Point Cihan Sahin ‐ [email protected]
LSSIP Contact Person Predrag Vranjkovic ‐[email protected]
Status Released
Intended for Agency Stakeholders
Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
Reference Documents
LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2017
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐plan
Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2016
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐report
European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/
STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor
Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
APPROVAL SHEET
The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature
confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions
laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan - Edition 2017 (also known as the
ESSIP Plan).
Stakeholder/ Name Position Signature
Organisation
DIRECTORATE
GENERAL OF CIVIL
AVIATION (DGCA)
GENERAL
DIRECTORATE OF
STATE AIRPORTS
AUTHORITY
TURKISH AIR FORCE
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey
Bahri KESICI
Funda OCAK
Brigadier General
Yusuf ERGE
Acting Director
General
General Director
Director of Air
Defence and
Com.Cont.
Released Issue
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey Released Issue
CONTENTS
1. National ATM Environment ............................................................. 6 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................6 1.1. National Stakeholders .........................................................................................7 1.2.
2. Traffic and Capacity ....................................................................... 15 Evolution of traffic in Turkey ............................................................................ 15 2.1. ANKARA ACC ‐ Traffic and en‐route ATFM delays 2013‐2022 ......................... 16 2.2. Summer 2017 performance ............................................................................. 16 2.3. Planning Period 2018‐2022 .............................................................................. 17 2.4.
3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 19
4. Implementation Projects ............................................................... 20 National projects .............................................................................................. 20 4.1. Regional projects .............................................................................................. 21 4.2.
5. Cooperation activities .................................................................... 22 FAB Co‐ordination ............................................................................................ 22 5.1. Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 22 5.2.
6. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................. 24 State View......................................................................................................... 24 6.1. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 30 6.2.
Annexes
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 1 Released Issue
24; 49%
5; 10%
3; 6%
9; 19%
6; 12%
2; 4% Completed
Ongoing
Planned
Late
No Plan
Not Applicable
Missing Data
Undefined
Executive Summary
National ATM Context
Civil aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Commission. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is the Turkish Regulatory Authority which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council and DHMI is the unique civil ANSP in Turkey.
Devlet Hava Meydanlari Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate general of State Airports of Turkey (www.dhmi.gov.tr) is the unique provider of Civil Air Navigation Services for Turkey. DHMI is a 100 % State‐owned Governmental department.
According to SHY‐ Gözetim which was enacted in parallel ESARR 1, DGCA Air Navigation Department undertakes the NSA responsibilities.
Traffic and Capacity
Traffic in Turkey increased by 7.5% during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2016.
Implementation Objectives Overview
Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives
All phases of the objectives (ATC02.9, ATC12.1 and ATC17) have been completed.
The objectives on direct routing and free route airspace will be finalized for 2019‐2020 period.
All actions of the objectives (ATC15.2, COM12, INFO07.1) will be conducted on time.
The objectives (AOP10, AOP 12 and AOP 13) are planned to complete in short term for Istanbul New Airport.
Progress per SESAR Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase.
Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 2 Released Issue
The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011‐2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.
Pre‐SESAR Implementation
2010 2019
84%
PCP Implementation
2015 2023
9%
Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.
ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs both for Block 0 and Block 1. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter 6.1.3.
Block 0 2010 2018
85%
Block 1 2015 2022
15%
43%
0%
Pre‐SESAR
89%
10%
94%
15%
96%
11%
Pre‐SESAR
Pre‐SESAR
Pre‐SESAR
PCP
PCP
PCP
PCP
Optimised ATM Network Services
Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing
Airport Operations
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 3 Released Issue
ATM Deployment Outlook
● State objec ves
Deployed in 2016‐2017: ‐ RNAV 1 for TMA Operations [NAV03.1] 100% progress ‐ Runway excursions [SAF11] 100% progress
‐ ETFMS [FCM01] 89% progress ‐ eTOD [INF07] 81% progress ‐ APV Procedures [NAV10] 55% progress
‐ TCAS II v7.1 [ATC16] 87% progress ‐ AMAN to en‐route [ATC15.1] 78% progress ‐ Direct Routing [AOM21.1] 10% progress
‐ Voice over IP [COM11] 53% progress ‐ Free Route Airspace [AOM21.2] 10% progress
‐ Extended Flight Plan [FCM08] 0% progress ‐ NewPENS [COM12] 0% progress
● Airport objec ves ‐ LTAC ‐ Ankara Esenboga Airport
Deployed in 2016‐2017:
● Airport objec ves ‐ LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport
Deployed in 2016‐2017: ‐ CCOs [ENV03] 100% progress
‐ CDOs [ENV01] 47% progress ‐ Airport CDM [AOP05] 10% progress
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 4 Released Issue
● Airport objec ves ‐ LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
Deployed in 2016‐2017: ‐ AMAN [ATC07.1] 100% progress
‐ Airport CDM [AOP05] 93% progress ‐ CDOs [ENV01] 47% progress ‐ Airport Safety Nets [AOP12] 18% progress ‐ Surface Movement Planning & Routing [AOP13] 12% progress
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 5 Released Issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years.
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players ‐ civil and military ‐ and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;
Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;
Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;
Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;
Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high‐level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017. In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.
The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 6 Released Issue
1. National ATM Environment
Geographical Scope 1.1.
International Membership
Turkey is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since
ECAC 1955
EUROCONTROL 1989
European Union NA
EASA NA
ICAO 1945
NATO 1952
ITU 1866
Geographical description of the FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses the Ankara and Istanbul FIRs. There is no separation between the lower and the upper airspace in the Turkish FIRs.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 7 Released Issue
Airspace Classification and Organisation
Turkey is evaluating the implementation of ICAO classification for both present and future systems. Airspace reorganisation as a result of studies is planned. It is not yet possible to predict when this will be completed.
National Stakeholders 1.2.
The main National Stakeholders involved within ATM in Turkey are the following:
- The Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication;
- The Directorate General of Civil Aviation – DGCA;
- The Devlet Hava Meydanlari Isletmesi (Directorate General of State Airports (Turkey) – DHMI;
- The Turkish Military Authority; and
- The Turkish State Meteorological Service.
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters.
Civil aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Commission. The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) is the Turkish Regulatory Authority which represents Turkey at the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council, and DHMI is the unique civil ANSP in Turkey.
The Military Authority permit some military aerodromes to be used by civil aviation in order to improve air transport links within Turkey.
Civil ATM incidents are investigated by the “Investigation and Assessment Commission” which reports incidents and investigation findings to the DGCA. The commission is formed from experts with sufficient qualifications. Where requested by the DHMI and/or if DGCA consider it necessary, experts from DGCA will also join the commission in accordance with SHY 65‐02. For civil or civil/military ATM related incidents occurring within the Military Terminal Area and military joint user airports, the DGCA will receive all documentation/reports concerning the incident from the military authorities and a joint investigation will be carried out.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 8 Released Issue
The Advisory and Steering Committee holds regular (quarterly) meetings with the participation of aviation organisations as coordinated by the DGCA to classify incidents, prepare statistical data, evaluate reports of the “Investigation and Assessment Commission” and to impose actions and/or give recommendations to the aviation community to prevent the re‐occurrence of similar incidents. The committee has the authority to include any aviation related issue on its agenda. Members of this Committee are comprised from the following organisations as appropriate:
- DGCA (www.shgm.gov.tr)
- DHMI (www.dhmi.gov.tr)
- Military Authority
- School of Civil Aviation (Aviation Experts)
- Turkish Airline Pilots’ Association (TALPA)
- Air Traffic Controllers Association of Turkey
- Other related stakeholders.
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below.
Civil Regulator(s)
General Information
Civil Aviation in Turkey is the responsibility of the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table overleaf. The DGCA is further detailed in the following sections.
Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis
Rule‐making DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Safety Oversight DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Enforcement actions in case of non‐compliance with safety regulatory requirements
DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Airspace DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Economic Ministry of Transport, maritime Affairs and Communication
Environment DGCA and Ministry of Environment and Urbanism
Security DGCA The Law No: 2920 and 5431
Accident investigation Investigation and Assessment Commission
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 9 Released Issue
DGCA
The Regulator is the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA). The DGCA is a body within the Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication with its own operating budget. The CAA responsibility is processed by DGCA.
The DGCA is responsible for:
- Licensing of Aircrew and Engineers
- Licensing of Air Traffic Controllers
- Licensing of ATSEPs
- Certificate of Airworthiness (CoA) of aircraft
- Approval of all airborne electronic equipment
- Oversight and certification of airports
- Investigation of Incidents by means of participation in Investigation and Assessment Commission and holding Advisory and Steering Committee Meetings.
- Approval and generation of all ATM rules/regulations (including ESARRs) in coordination with stakeholders (DHMI, Turkish Air Force General Staff and other bodies as appropriate).
Economic regulation is carried out by the Turkish Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communication.
Annual Report published: N
www.shgm.gov.tr
Organisation chart is shown in Annex B of this document.
ANSP‐DHMI
Services provided
Devlet Hava Meydanları Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate General of State Airports of Turkey (www.dhmi.gov.tr) is the unique Provider of Civil Air Navigation Services for Turkey. DHMI is a 100 % State‐owned Governmental department. DHMI provides all the Air Traffic Services within civil airspace (Controlled Airspace, TMA and CTRs).
DHMI cooperates very closely with the DGCA, particularly on safety matters such as the implementation of the ESARRs.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 10 Released Issue
Name of the ANSP: Devlet Hava Meydanları Isletmesi (DHMI) Air Navigation Department of Directorate General of State Airports of Turkey
Governance: Governmental department Ownership: 100% State owned
Services provided Y/N Comment
ATC en‐route Y
ATC approach Y
ATC Aerodrome(s) Y
AIS Y
CNS Y
MET N Turkish State Meteorological Service
ATCO training Y
Others Y Airport management
Additional information:
Provision of services in other State(s):
N
Annual Report published: Y http://www.dhmi.gov.tr/dosyalar/annualreport/2016/DHMI%20Annual%20Report%202016.pdf
www.dhmi.gov.tr
Organisation chart is shown in Annex B.
ATC systems in use
Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 N
FDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX
Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? -
ATC Unit Ankara ACC
SDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: SELEX
Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2015
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? -
ATC Unit Ankara ACC
1Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 11 Released Issue
ATC Units
En‐route air navigation services throughout Turkish Airspace from one Area Control Center located in Ankara There are 27 TMAs and 12 MTMAs in Turkish Airspace. Description of the ATC units providing the services and their areas of responsibility; Size of the ATC unit (maximum number of sectors); Service provided (en‐route or TMA – no more ref to TWR).
The ATC units in the Turkish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:
The ATC units in the Turkish airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:
ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks
En‐route TMA
Ankara ACC 22 2 Ankara
Istanbul
Istanbul / Yeşilköy APP
7 Istanbul
Izmir / Menderes APP
4 Istanbul
Antalya APP 8 Istanbul
Dalaman APP 3 İstanbul
Airports
General information Turkey has 58 airports used by GAT. These range from busy international airports to small regional airports with perhaps ten or less movements daily.
Air navigation service is provided for all airports by DHMI except Eskişehir Anadolu, İzmir Efes, Samsun Ondokuz Mayıs and İstanbul Hezarfen Airports.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 12 Released Issue
Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
The airports covered by this LSSIP document are as follows:
- Istanbul Atatürk airport - Antalya Airport, and - Ankara Esenboga airport
The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/LTBA
https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/LTAC
https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/LTAI
Military Authorities
The military authority also plays a major role in managing the Turkish Airspace especially with regard to FUA. Military ATC is entirely separated from Civil ATC, although very good civil/military co‐ordination is maintained. Co‐ordination between the military authority and the DHMI is ensured through a Civil‐Military Co‐ordination Group. Some (11) airports/airfields of military origin are jointly used by military and civil aviation. For the eight (8) airports of them, all aircraft are under military ATC control.
Currently, Turkish Military Authority and DHMI have their own alternative FUA concept which is considered more suitable for the local geo‐political situation. In order to increase the capacity of Turkish airspace, with implementation of the SMART system, DHMI and the Military Authority are planning to implement EUROCONTROL Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) concept to do that necessary legislation has been published at Official Gazette dated 18 April 2014. The studies are going on to establish infrastructure and units. The military regulatory, service provision and user role within ATM is detailed below.
Regulatory role
Regulatory framework and rule‐making
OAT GAT
OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?
Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?
y
Level of such legal provision: State Law 2920. Level of such legal provision: State Law 2920
Authority signing such legal provision: Parliament Authority signing such legal provision: Parliament
These provisions cover: These provisions cover:
Rules of the Air for OAT N
Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT Y
OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y
ATCO Training Y ATCO Training Y
ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing Y
ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N
ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N
Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N
Aircrew Licensing N
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 13 Released Issue
Oversight
Service Provision role
Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?
N If YES, since: ‐ Duration of the Certificate:
‐
Certificate issued by: MOD If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?
Additional Information:
Additional Information: Other than the State Law 2920 which grants provision for OAT the Turkish Air Force operate under different State or NATO regulations
Additional Information: There is a protocol between the General Staff and Ministry of Transport, Maritime affairs and Communication for the use of military airports by civil aircraft.
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
National AIP Y National AIP Y
National Military AIP NA National Military AIP N
EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N
Other: NA Other: NA
OAT GAT
National oversight body for OAT: Turkish General Staff HQ.
National Supervisory Authority (as per SES reg. 550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military.
OAT GAT
Services Provided: Services Provided:
En‐Route NA En‐Route N
Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA Y
Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y
AIS Y AIS Y
MET N Turkish State Meteorological Service
MET N
SAR Y By the Turkish Air Force for both OAT and GAT
SAR Y
TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS Y
Other: Security Services Other:
Additional Information: NIL. Additional Information: NIL.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 14 Released Issue
User role
Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?
OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT Y
If Military fly OAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:
Free Routing Within specific corridors only
Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y
Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service
If Military fly GAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:
No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges Y
Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Y Provision of ATC in UHF Y
CNS exemptions: RVSM Y 8.33 Y Mode S Y ACAS Y
Others: The above exemptions do not apply to military heavy transport or VIP aircraft.
Military in Turkey applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: N
FUA Level 1 implemented: N
FUA Level 2 implemented: N
FUA Level 3 implemented: N
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 15 Released Issue
2. Traffic and Capacity
Evolution of traffic in Turkey 2.1.
2017 Traffic in Turkey increased by 7.5% during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2016.
2018‐2022
The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year Forecast predicts an average annual increase between 2.8% and 6.7% for Turkey during the 5 year planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 4.6%.
0
500.000
1.000.000
1.500.000
2.000.000
2.500.000
2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F
IFR
flig
hts
Turkey - Annual IFR Movements
IFR movements - Actuals
IFR movements - Baseline forecast
IFR movements - High forecast
IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast
2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 FH 6.3% 9.2% 6.6% 6.4% 5.5% 5.6% 5.7%B 11.2% 6.8% -1.5% 5.8% 6.9% 4.8% 4.0% 3.6% 3.8% 3.6%L 5.4% 4.9% 2.5% 2.8% 1.8% 2.0% 1.9%
ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7%
EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017)IFR flights yearly growth
Turkey
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 16 Released Issue
ANKARA ACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2013-2022 2.2.
Summer 2017 performance 2.3.
Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En‐route Delay (min/flight) ‐ Summer
Capacity gap Ref value Actual
+ 7.4% 221 (+6%) 0.23 0.0 No
The enroute delay per flight in Ankara ACC remained at zero minutes per flight as in Summer 2016.
Capacity Plan +10% Achieved Comments
Improved civil/military coordination Yes
DMAN at LTBA No
Technical problems solved. Tests ongoing. Planned implementation 2018.
Airport CDM at LTBA No Technical problems solved. Tests ongoing. Planned implementation 2018.
Improved ATFCM, including STAM Yes
ATS route structure development Yes
Gradual upper airspace re‐sectorisation (20 to 25 sectors + FL235) Yes
Additional controllers (45 per year for en‐route) Yes
MINI project for interface within Turkey – additional CWPs Yes Ongoing
Capacity Assessment through a CAPAN study Yes
Maximum configuration: 17 sectors Yes 15 sectors were sufficient
Summer 2017 performance assessment
The capacity baseline of 221 was calculated with ACCESS for the new area of responsibility of Ankara ACC. During the same period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 225 and the peak 3 hour demand was 211.
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Peak Day Traffic 2587 2993 3370 4377 4629
Summer Traffic 2312 2626 2893 3842 4128
Yearly Traffic* 2037 2302 2574 3443 3705
Summer Traffic Forecast 4382 4589 4751 4925 5110
High Traffic Forecast - Summer 4468 4754 5033 5318 5614
Low Traffic Forecast - Summer 4294 4404 4512 4606 4689
Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.11 0.11 0.22 0.00 0.00
Yearly enroute delay (all causes) * 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.00
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
En
rou
te D
ela
y (m
inu
tes
pe
r fli
ght)
IFR
flig
hts
(Dai
ly A
vera
ge)
LTAAACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays
*From 01/01/2017 to 31/10/2017
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 17 Released Issue
Planning Period 2018-2022 2.4.
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Capacity Profiles
ACC 2017
baseline
Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
2018 2019
LTAA 221
H 250 13% 267 7%
Ref. 245 11% 256 4%
L 240 9% 245 2%
Open 235 6% 246 5%
C/R 242 10% 253 5%
Summer Capacity Plan
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
Free Route Airspace Stepped implementation of direct/free
route operations above FL290
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Improved civil/military coordination
Airport & TMA Network Integration Istanbul area
ATC/TMA Center
Cooperative Traffic Management Improved ATFCM, including STAM
Airspace
ATS route structure development
Gradual upper airspace re‐
sectorisation (20 to 25 sectors +
FL235)
New interface with neighbouring states for new Istanbul airport
Procedures New SIDs/STARs for Istanbul TMA
airports
Staffing Additional controllers (45 per year for en‐route)
Technical
MINI project for interface within
Turkey – additional CWPs
Capacity
RTS of Turkish airspace and Interface with neighbouring
states
Capacity Assessment
through a CAPAN study
Significant Events
New airport in Istanbul
from Q3 2018 phase 1A
New airport in Istanbul
from beginning 2019 phase 1B New airport in Istanbul
3 additional phases (depending on capacity triggers)
New APP control office for LTFJ
Independent parallel runway and new ground infrastructure at
LTFJ
Max sectors 30 30 30 30 30
Planned Annual Capacity Increase 20% 6% 6% 6% 6%
Reference profile Annual % Increase 11% 4% N/A N/A N/A
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 18 Released Issue
Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile
8.2% 9.8% N/A N/A N/A
Annual Reference Value (min) 0.15 0.15 N/A N/A N/A
Summer reference value (min) 0.22 0.22 N/A N/A N/A
Additional information
Based on the expected traffic evolution in summer 2018, a maximum of 21 sectors should be sufficient to handle traffic demand. However, as stated in the above plan, up to 30 sectors can be opened if required.
2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook
DHMI is planning sufficient capacity to cope with expected demand. However, some delays and restrictions might be necessary due to the crisis situation in neighbouring states, shifting and concentrating traffic flows in some sectors of Ankara ACC.
0
5
10
15
20
25
00:00
02:00
04:00
06:00
08:00
10:00
12:00
14:00
16:00
18:00
20:00
22:00
Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WD
0
5
10
15
20
25
00:00
02:00
04:00
06:00
08:00
10:00
12:00
14:00
16:00
18:00
20:00
22:00
Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WE
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2018‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 245 256
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 235 246
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 242 253
Capacity Profile ‐ High 250 267
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 240 245
Capacity Baseline 208 221
2018 ‐ 2022 Plan 265 281 298 316 335
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Cap
acity profile (movemen
ts per hour)
LTAAACC - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 19 Released Issue
3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions
Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to Turkey for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.
Conclusion Applicable to VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT
ROUTING.
THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS.
(page 14 of the Report)
All State that are
implementing
AOM21.1 and
AOM21.2 State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES
Description of the planned action: TR is planning implementation of Free Route by 2020.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 20 Released Issue
4. Implementation Projects
National projects 4.1.
Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:
A‐SMGCS Level I and II (SMGCS)
DHMI (TR) 2008‐2010 Completed L3: AOP04.1, AOP04.2
AMAN (AMAN) DHMI (TR) 2009‐2016 Completed L3: ATC07.1
AMAN/DMAN (Arrival Manager/Departure Manager) Extention at Istanbul Ataturk Airport
DHMI (TR) 2018‐2019 Ongoing ‐
ARTAS (ART) DHMI (TR) 2006‐2015 Completed L3: ITY‐SPI
MINI Project (MINI_TR)
DHMI (TR) Target date is the opening time of the Istanbul New Airport.
Ongoing ‐
Project SMART implementation (SMART_SYS)
DHMI (TR) 2006‐2015 Completed L3: ATC17, FCM03
Radars replacement (RDR)
DHMI (TR) 2009‐2013 Completed L3: ITY‐SPI
Renovation of Dalaman SSR System and Supply and Installation of PSR / Mode‐S SSR System to Istanbul New Airport
DHMI (TR) 2017‐2019 Ongoing ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 21 Released Issue
Regional projects 4.2.
Extended AMAN Project (EXT‐AMAN)
Organisation(s): DHMI (TR) Type of project: Regional
Schedule: Target date for this project is first quarter of 2018.
Status: Ongoing
Description: This project is comprimising Bulgarian airspace besides Istanbul TMA including Atatürk and Istanbul New Airport. New AMAN positions will be installed related Bulgarian ATC units.
Link and references
ATM MP links: L3: ATC15.1, ATC15.2
Other links: ‐
Project included in RP2 Performance Plan:
NA Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan:
‐
Project included in DP2016:
NA Name/Code in DP2016: ‐
Performance contribution
Safety: ++ Providing more efficient safety benefits
Environment: ‐
Capacity: +++ Increasing capacity
Cost‐efficiency: ‐
Operational efficiency: +++ Increasing the coordination and operational procedures between two
adjacent ATC units
Cooperation Activities: ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 22 Released Issue
5. Cooperation activities
FAB Co‐ordination 5.1.
Not applicable.
Regional cooperation 5.2.
Regional cooperation initiatives
It is to be noted that Turkey maintains very close cooperation/co‐ordination with all neighbouring states.
Turkey has taken on responsibility of some transition tasks in the area and arranging air traffic flow to / from
Europe. Turkey is co‐operating with neighbouring states such as Greece and Bulgaria to optimise the
performance of Ground‐Ground Networks and data exchange.
It is also considered that, collaborating as closely as we can with our neighbouring civil air navigation service
providers has a paramount importance in order to optimise the airspace design and management and increase
the regional capacity, safety and quality. Therefore, Turkey undertakes initiatives and efforts to ensure the
application of same concepts, standards and projects under the EUROCONTROL framework.
The fundamental purpose of the Cooperative Airspace Initiative (CAI) is to foster cooperation between NATO
members on airspace surveillance and air traffic coordination with the goals of enhancing transparency,
predictability and the collective capabilities to fight against terrorist air threats. Turkey is playing an essential
role in this project with Local Coordination Unit (LCU), established in Ankara.
On 16 May 2012, a Memorandum of Co‐operation (MoC) was signed between DHMI and Bulgarian Air Traffic
Services Authority (BULATSA) in Ankara. The MoC aimed at common understanding or adoption of ICAO,
EUROCONTROL and other international requirements relevant for the ATM domain and cooperation for
operational area. In the framework of this MoC, the delegations of the DHMI and BULATSA discussed the main
aspects of future co‐operation, such as ensuring an effective route network, common operational and
technical projects, etc.
On 20 June 2012 Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE) and DHMI signed a MOU in Ukraine
which aims the development of regional cooperation between UkSATSE and DHMI. It was also agreed that
working groups on air traffic management, communication, navigation and surveillance, economic and
financial support will further negotiate the related issues.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 23 Released Issue
Regarding with the enhancement of traffic flow between airspaces of Turkey and her neighbouring countries,
DHMI has been co‐operated with ANSPs to implement airspace changes (new COPs and routes) at the
Bulgarian, Georgian, Iranian and Iraq interfaces. As a result of this co‐operation; DHMI has completely changed
the routes on main axes for traffic between Europe and Mid‐East / Gulf Area / Asia / Far‐East.
Also; together with her neighbouring ANSPs and Eurocontrol, DHMI has been working on the airspace changes
that are required to facilitate the traffic flow for Istanbul New Airport that is planned to be in use from the last
quarter of 2018.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 24 Released Issue
6. Implementation Objectives Progress
State View 6.1.
Overall Objective Implementation
Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives
All phases of the objectives (ATC02.9, ATC12.1 and ATC17) have been completed.
The objectives on direct routing and free route airspace will be finalized for 2019‐2020 period. All actions of the objectives (ATC15.2, COM12, INFO07.1) will be conducted on time.
The objectives (AOP10, AOP 12 and AOP 13) are planned to complete in short term for Istanbul New Airport.
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 25 Released Issue
Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature
Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C.
Legend:
## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF)
100% = Objective completed = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline
Optimised ATM Network Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling
25%
‐
AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA 0%
‐
AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data 0%
‐
AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing
0%
‐
FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services 89%
FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 100%
FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1
n/a
FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2
n/a
FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP 0%
‐
FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment
n/a
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 26 Released Issue
Advanced Air Traffic Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOM21.1 (PCP)
Direct Routing 10%
AOM21.2 (PCP)
Free Route Airspace 10%
AOP14 Remote Tower Services Local objective
LTCO ‐ AGRI 0%
ATC02.2 STCA En‐Route 100%
ATC02.8 Ground‐Based Safety Nets 100%
ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs 100%
ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport 100%
ATC12.1
Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring
100%
ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN
78%
ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace
16%
ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1
87%
ATC17
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer
100%
ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T
Local objective
n/a
ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport 47%
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport 47%
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport 100%
LTBA ‐ ISTANBUL/ATATURK 100%
LTBS ‐ MUGLA/DALAMAN (MIL.CIV.) 100%
LTFE ‐ MILAS/BODRUM 100%
ITY‐COTR Ground‐Ground Automated Co‐ordination Processes
n/a
NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 100%
NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations 10%
‐
NAV10 APV procedures 55%
NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft
Local objective
n/a
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 27 Released Issue
High Performing Airport Operations
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1
LTAC ‐ Ankara Esenboga Airport
100%
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport 100%
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
100%
AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2
LTAC ‐ Ankara Esenboga Airport
100%
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport 100%
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
100%
AOP05 Airport CDM
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport 10%
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
93%
AOP10 (PCP)
Time‐Based Separation 0%
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
0%
AOP11 (PCP)
Initial Airport Operations Plan
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
AOP12 (PCP)
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
18%
AOP13 (PCP)
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
12%
ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport 100%
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
100%
SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions
100%
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 28 Released Issue
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 100%
COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 53%
COM12 (PCP) NewPENS 0%
FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 0%
INF04 Integrated Briefing 100%
INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 81%
ITY‐ACID Aircraft Identification
n/a
ITY‐ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information
36%
ITY‐AGDL Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services
n/a
ITY‐AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195
n/a
ITY‐FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100%
ITY‐SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability
n/a
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 29 Released Issue
ICAO ASBU Implementation
The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.
These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).
Legend:
= Completed (during 2017 or before)
= Missing planning date
= Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable
<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance
100%
78%
B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2)
100%
B0‐FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground‐Ground Integration
100%
B0‐DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management
100%
68%
B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%
87%
B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets
100%
B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through 100%
52%
B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)
100%
89%
B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories
100%
37%
B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network‐Wide view
100%
94%
B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance
B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)
100%
47%
B0‐TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En‐Route
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 30 Released Issue
Detailed Objectives Implementation progress 6.2.
Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C.
Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:
Completed No Plan
Ongoing Not Applicable
Planned Missing Data
Late
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 31 Released Issue
Main Objectives
AOM13.1
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
25% No Plan
‐
Turkish FUA Regulation has been published in Official Gazette on 18 April 2014. The Military Authority has completed it's structure to implement FUA in Turkish Airspace. Personnel assignments and software developments has been completed. The Military Authority is ready to fully implement FUA in Turkish Airspace.
‐
REG (By:12/2018)
DGCA No current plan related appropriate legislation. ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
ASP (By:12/2018)
DHMI No current plan until appropriate legislation is passed. Implementation of the objective will take place in parallel with the military
‐ 0% No Plan
‐
MIL (By:12/2018)
Mil. Authority
Turkish FUA Regulation has been published in Official Gazette on 18 April 2014. The Military Authority has completed it's structure to implement FUA in Turkish Airspace. Personnel assignments and software developments has been completed. The Military Authority is ready to fully implement FUA in Turkish Airspace.
‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
AOM19.1
ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
0% No Plan
‐
This objective will be re‐evaluated for the next LSSIP cycle. ‐
ASP (By:12/2018)
DHMI ‐ ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
AOM19.2
ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% No Plan
‐
No plan ‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
DHMI ‐ ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 32 Released Issue
AOM19.3
Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% No Plan
‐
No plan ‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
DHMI ‐ ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
AOM21.1
Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017
10% Late
‐
Implementation of direct routing planned and necessary activities will be completed before 31/12/2019.
31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2017)
DHMI Implementation of direct routing planned and necessary activities will be completed before 31/12/2019.
‐ 10% Late
31/12/2019
AOM21.2
Free Route Airspace Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
10% Ongoing
‐
Implementation of free route airspace is planned in 2020. 31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2021)
DHMI Implementation of free route airspace is planned in 2020. ‐ 10% Ongoing
31/12/2020
AOP04.1
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
100% Completed
LTAC ‐ Ankara Esenboga Airport
Ankara implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
REG (By:12/2010)
DGCA No plan to implement. Not applicable in TR. ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2011)
DHMI Ankara implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. A‐SMGCS
Level I and II 100%
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2010)
ANKARA Esenboga Airport
Drivers have received instruction on the system. ‐ 100% Completed
30/06/2010
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 33 Released Issue
AOP04.1
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
100% Completed
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport
Antalya implemented A‐SMGCS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
REG (By:12/2010)
DGCA Not applicable in TR. ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2011)
DHMI Antalya implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. All training and development of procedures has been completed.
A‐SMGCS Level I and II
100% Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2010)
ANTALYA Airport
Drivers have received instruction on the system ‐ 100% Completed
30/06/2010
AOP04.1
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2011
100% Completed
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
Istanbul implemented A‐SMGCS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
REG (By:12/2010)
DGCA Not applicable in TR. ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2011)
DHMI Istanbul implemented A‐SMGCS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. All training and development of procedures has been completed.
A‐SMGCS Level I and II
100% Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2010)
ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport
Drivers have received instruction on the system. ‐ 100% Completed
30/06/2010
AOP04.2
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
100% Completed
LTAC ‐ Ankara Esenboga Airport
Ankara implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
ASP (By:12/2017)
DHMI Ankara implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. A‐SMGCS
Level I and II 100%
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2017)
ANKARA Esenboga Airport
Drivers have received instruction on the system. ‐ 100% Completed
30/06/2010
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 34 Released Issue
AOP04.2
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
100% Completed
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport
Antalya implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
ASP (By:12/2017)
DHMI Antalya implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. A‐SMGCS
Level I and II 100%
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2017)
ANTALYA Airport
Drivers have received instruction on the system. ‐ 100% Completed
30/06/2010
AOP04.2
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
100% Completed
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
Istanbul implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. 30/06/2010
ASP (By:12/2017)
DHMI Istanbul implemented A‐SMGS Level 1 and 2 in June 2010. A‐SMGCS
Level I and II 100%
Completed
30/06/2010
APO (By:12/2017)
ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport
Drivers have received instruction on the system. ‐ 100% Completed
30/06/2010
AOP05
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
10% Late
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport
A draft MoU has been circulated to key stakeholders. Studies for Antalya are going on. 31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2016)
DHMI DHMI has initiated action to implement this objective. A draft MoU has been developed and circulated to key stakeholders.
‐ 10% Late
31/12/2018
APO (By:12/2016)
ANTALYA Airport
DHMI has initiated action to implement this objective. A draft MoU has been developed and circulated to key stakeholders
‐ 10% Late
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 35 Released Issue
AOP05
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
93% Late
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests have been completed.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2016)
DHMI A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established and tests have been completed.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
APO (By:12/2016)
ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport
A MoU has been agreed and signed. Working groups have been formed. CDM platform has been established. The exchange of messages will be implemented.
‐ 85% Late
31/12/2018
AOP10 Time‐Based Separation Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
0% Planned
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
The implementation of TBS is planned for Istanbul New Airport in 2021. 31/12/2021
REG (By:12/2023)
DGCA Necessary actions will be taken before the implementation date.
‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2023)
DHMI The implementation of TBS is planned for Istanbul New Airport in 2021.
‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2021
AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
All information effecting the air traffic flow for airports has been published via AIP, NOTAMs and airport corner web site.
‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
DHMI All information effecting the air traffic flow for airports has been published via AIP, NOTAMs and airport corner web site.
‐ % Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2021)
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 36 Released Issue
AOP12
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
18% Ongoing
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
No plan for Atatürk Airport. The installation of the electronic flight strips with DCL function is planned for Istanbul New Airport which will be fully integrated with new A‐SMGCS Level 4 (+) system. The implementation of the ATC clearances monitoring tools will be included within new software.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2020)
DHMI
No plan for Atatürk Airport. The installation of the electronic flight strips with DCL function is planned for Istanbul New Airport which will be fully integrated with new A‐SMGCS Level 4 (+) system. The implementation of the ATC clearances monitoring tools will be included within new software.
‐ 20%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
APO (By:12/2020)
ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport
No plan for Atatürk Airport. The installation of the electronic flight strips with DCL function is planned for Istanbul New Airport which will be fully integrated with new A‐SMGCS Level 4 (+) system. The implementation of the ATC clearances monitoring tools will be included within new software.
‐ 10%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
AOP13
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
12% Ongoing
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
No plan for Atatürk Airport. These functions will be executed as the part of Istanbul New Airport's A‐SMGCS System in 2018.
31/12/2018
REG (By:12/2023)
DGCA All actions will be taken before implementation date. ‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2023)
DHMI No plan for Atatürk Airport. These functions will be executed as the part of Istanbul New Airport's A‐SMGCS System in 2018.
‐ 15% Ongoing
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 37 Released Issue
ATC02.8
Ground‐Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
100% Completed
‐
All functions implemented. 18/11/2015
ASP (By:12/2016)
Mil. Authority Military units have APM functionality but due to the dynamic nature of OAT operations this functionality is only enabled at airports that serve GAT.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2008
DHMI
APW level 2 has been implemented with the SMART project which was completed 11/2015. MSAW has been implemented with the SMART system. APM, in line with EUROCONTROL specifications, has been implemented at Istanbul, Esenboga, Antalya, Dalaman, Bodrum and Izmir airports in parallel with SMART.
‐ 100%
Completed
18/11/2015
ATC02.9
Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
100% Completed
‐
Implementation of STCA funct,on in TMA has already adapted to major TMAs like Istanbul, Ankara, Antalya, Izmir; Dalaman, Milas and Trabzon.
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2020)
DHMI Implementation of STCA funct,on in TMA has already adapted to major TMAs like Istanbul, Ankara, Antalya, Izmir; Dalaman, Milas and Trabzon.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2015
ATC07.1
AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2019
100% Completed
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
Tender and acceptance of AMAN has already been done for Atatürk and S.Gölçen Airports. AMAN has been operational since last quarter of 2016.
30/09/2016
ASP (By:12/2019)
DHMI
Tender and acceptance of AMAN has already been done for Atatürk and S.Gölçen Airports. AMAN has been operational since last quarter of 2016. Preparation of technical aspects for Antalya Airport AMAN has been finalised and tender held on in 2015 but due to lack of enough participants for tender, second tender will be realized in 2017.
AMAN 100%
Completed
30/09/2016
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 38 Released Issue
ATC12.1
Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
100% Completed
‐
MONA functions has been implemented. ATCO training on MONA has been conducted. 07/07/2015
ASP (By:12/2021)
DHMI MONA functions has been implemented. ATCO training on MONA has been conducted.
‐ 100% Completed
07/07/2015
ATC15.1
Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
78% Late
‐
AMAN is operational for Istanbul Atatürk and S.Gökçen Airports. Adjacent ACC sectors within SMART project have been equiped with AMAN supporting systems, including monitors and sofware. New AMAN software will be implemented by 2019 for Istanbul TMA including Istanbul New Airport and S.Gökçen Airport. Beside this related ACC sectors of Sofia ACC will equiped with AMAN supporting systems, including monitors and sofware
31/12/2019
ASP (By:12/2017)
DHMI
The implementation of AMAN is planned for Istanbul Atatürk and S.Gökçen Airports. We have already arranged close cooperation with BULATSA on AMAN implementation.
Extended AMAN Project
78%
Late
31/12/2019
ATC15.2
Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
16% Ongoing
‐
Extended AMAN project for Istanbul TMA and related ACC sectors including Sofia ACC will be started by end of 2018.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2023)
DHMI Extended AMAN project for Istanbul TMA and related ACC sectors including Sofia ACC will be started by end of 2018.
Extended AMAN Project
16% Ongoing
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 39 Released Issue
ATC17
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
100% Completed
‐
All functions have been in use with SMART project.Safety arguments for changes will be generated.
18/11/2015
ASP (By:12/2018)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
DHMI All functions have been in use with SMART project.
Project SMART
implementation
100%
Completed
18/11/2015
COM10
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
100% Completed
‐
The AMHS/AFTN/CIDIN system is active now. The existing system is making data exchange. There is no need to Implement gateway between national non‐AMHS network (other than AFTN) and AMHS at the moment. Military have their own communication network for OAT message purposes. The system is fully interoperable with the ANSP.
31/12/2014
ASP (By:12/2018)
DHMI ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/10/2014
Mil. Authority
The AMHS/AFTN/CIDIN system is active now. The existing system is making data exchange. There is no need to Implement gateway between national non‐AMHS network (other than AFTN) and AMHS at the moment. Military have their own communication network for OAT message purposes. The system is fully interoperable with the ANSP.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
COM11
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
53% Ongoing
‐
Turkey will implement VoIP based network until 2020. 31/10/2020
ASP (By:12/2020)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
DHMI Turkey will implement VoIP based network until 2020. ‐ 53% Ongoing
31/10/2020
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 40 Released Issue
COM12
New Pan‐European Network Service (NewPENS) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability (Other stakeholders): 31/12/2024
0% Planned
‐
Infrastructure will be adapted for NewPENS by end of 2022. New contract and migration of services will be done until end of 2023.
31/12/2023
ASP (By:12/2024)
DHMI Infrastructure will be adapted for NewPENS by end of 2022. New contract and migration of services will be done until end of 2023.
‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2023
APO (By:12/2024)
DHMI Infrastructure will be adapted for NewPENS by end of 2022. New contract and migration of services will be done until end of 2023.
‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2023
ENV01
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013
47% Late
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport
An initial CDA workshop meeting was given by EUROCONTROL. DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term future.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2013)
DHMI DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. ‐ 45% Late
31/12/2018
APO (By:12/2013)
ANTALYA Airport
DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. ‐ 50% Late
31/12/2018
ENV01
Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2007 Full operational capability: 31/12/2013
47% Late
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
An initial CDA workshop meeting was given by EUROCONTROL. DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term future.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2013)
DHMI DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. ‐ 45% Late
31/12/2018
APO (By:12/2013)
ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport
DHMI will implement CDO in the medium term. ‐ 50% Late
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 41 Released Issue
ENV02
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
100% Completed
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. There is legislation regarding maximum noise levels generated by aircraft but no system of enforcement/punitive measures has been developed as yet. Local traffic regulations have been developed in coordination with airport and airline operators in 2014 and implemented at first half of 2015.
30/04/2015
ASP (By:12/2016)
DHMI
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.Local traffic regulations have been developed in coordination with airport and airline operators in 2014 and implemented at first half of 2015.
‐ 100%
Completed
30/04/2015
APO (By:12/2016)
ANTALYA Airport
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.Local traffic regulations have been developed in 2014 and implemented at first half of 2015.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
ENV02
Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2004 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
100% Completed
LTBA ‐ Istanbul Atatürk Airport
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project. There is legislation regarding maximum noise levels generated by aircraft but no system of enforcement/punitive measures has been developed as yet.
31/12/2014
ASP (By:12/2016)
DHMI
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
APO (By:12/2016)
ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport
SIDs have been designed to provide noise abatement over the most congested areas. Noise monitors have been established and data is being analysed in a noise map pilot project.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 42 Released Issue
FCM03
Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
100% Completed
‐
The SMART system is capable of compliance with all SLoAs other than ASP09. The other remaining objectives are in use.
07/07/2015
ASP (By:12/2017)
DHMI The SMART system is capable of compliance with all SLoAs other than ASP09. The other remaining objectives are in use.
Project SMART
implementation
100%
Completed
07/07/2015
FCM04.1
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
TR is not in the applicability area. ‐
ASP (By:10/2017)
DHMI ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
FCM04.2
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Turkey is not within applicability area of this objective. ‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
DHMI ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
FCM05
Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% No Plan
‐
The decision to implementation of interactive rolling NOP has not been taken yet. ‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
DHMI ‐ ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
APO (By:12/2021)
DHMI No plan ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 43 Released Issue
FCM06
Traffic Complexity Assessment (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
DHMI Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective.
‐ % Not Applicable
‐
FCM08
Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% Planned
‐
The infrastucture and operational functions will be prepared until 2021. 31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
DHMI The infrastucture and operational functions will be prepared until 2021.
‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2021
INF07
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018
81% Ongoing
‐
National law has been published to enable the provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data for Area 1. The other regulatory issues will be completed in 2018.
31/05/2018
REG (By:05/2018)
DGCA
National law has been published to enable the provision of electronic terrain and obstacle data for Area 1.TOD regulatory has been prepared in accordance with law for Area 1.
‐ 63%
Ongoing
31/05/2018
ASP (By:05/2018)
DHMI All actions have been completed in accordance with national TOD regulations.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
APO (By:05/2018)
DHMI All actions have been completed in accordance with national TOD regulations.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
ITY‐ACID
Aircraft Identification (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Turkey is not within applicability area of this objective. ‐
ASP (By:01/2020)
DHMI ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 44 Released Issue
ITY‐ADQ
Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
36% Late
‐
Data quality and digital exchange format requirements have been implemented.The other actions will be completed before implementation date.
31/12/2022
REG (By:06/2017)
DGCA Verification processes will be completed before the implementation date.
‐ 0% Late
31/12/2022
ASP (By:06/2017)
DHMI Data quality and digital exchange format requirements have been implemented.The other actions will be completed before implementation date.
‐ 40% Late
31/12/2022
APO (By:06/2017)
DHMI Data quality and digital exchange format requirements have been implemented.The other actions will be completed before implementation date.
‐ 52% Late
31/12/2022
ITY‐AGDL
Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ‐
REG (By:02/2018)
DGCA ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:02/2018)
DHMI ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
MIL (By:01/2019)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 45 Released Issue
ITY‐AGVCS2
8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
TR is not in the applicability area. ‐
REG (By:12/2018)
DGCA ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2018)
DHMI ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
MIL (By:12/2020)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2018)
ITY‐FMTP
Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014
100% Completed
‐
The common flight message transfer protocol has been introduced with the SMART system. 31/05/2015
ASP (By:12/2014)
DHMI The common flight message transfer protocol has been introduced with the SMART system.
‐ 100% Completed
31/05/2015
Mil. Authority
Military has its own network between military sites and there is no plan to upgrade this system. The interface between military/civil sites has been completed. Current interface is limited for monitoring the sellected flights.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/05/2015
MIL (By:12/2014)
Mil. Authority Military has its own network between military sites and there is no plan to upgrade this system. The interface between military/civil sites has been completed.
‐ 100% Completed
31/05/2015
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 46 Released Issue
ITY‐SPI
Surveillance Performance and Interoperability (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Turkey is not an EU+ State. ‐
REG (By:02/2015)
DGCA Turkey is not EU+ State. ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:02/2015)
DHMI Turkey is not EU+ State. ARTAS / Radars
replacement
% Not Applicable
‐
MIL (By:06/2020)
Mil. Authority Turkey is not EU+ State. ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
NAV03.1
RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
100% Completed
‐
P‐RNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at Istanbul, S.Gökçen, Antalya, Esenboga, Dalaman, Bodrum, Trabzon Airports. Implementation at other airports will continue in due course.
31/12/2017
ASP (By:12/2023)
Mil. Authority P‐RNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at some military airports. Implementation at other military airports will continue in due course.
‐ % Completed
‐
DHMI
P‐RNAV SIDs and STARS have been implemented at Istanbul, S.Gökçen, Antalya, Esenboga, Dalaman, Bodrum Airports. Implementation at other airports will continue in due course.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2017
NAV03.2
RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
10% No Plan
‐
No plans at this stage. ‐
ASP (By:12/2023)
DHMI ‐ ‐ 10% No Plan
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 47 Released Issue
NAV10
APV Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
55% Late
‐
Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO ‐VNAV operations has been published. APV BARO‐VNAV procedures for some airports have been published. Studies to design new procedures are going on.
31/12/2018
REG (By:04/2016)
DGCA Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO ‐VNAV operations has been published.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2016)
DHMI
Regulation for RNP Approach Operations including APV BARO ‐VNAV operations has been published. APV BARO‐VNAV procedures for some airports have been published. Studies to design new procedures are going on.
‐ 40%
Late
31/12/2018
SAF11
Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018
100% Completed
‐
Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams are responsible for runway excursions.
31/12/2016
REG (By:01/2018)
DGCA Necessary actions have been handled. ‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2016
Mil. Authority Necessary actions have been handled. ‐ 100% Completed
‐
ASP (By:12/2014)
DHMI Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams are responsible for runway excursions.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2016
APO (By:12/2014)
ISTANBUL Atatürk Airport
Local runway safety teams have been established for each aerodromes. These teams areresponsible for runway excursions.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 48 Released Issue
Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring
ATC02.2
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013
100% Completed
‐
Is a functionality included as part of SMART system and was operational from 09/2008. All en‐route and TMA airspace is covered. STCA implementation/procedures will be audited by the DGCA when human resources permit.
30/09/2008
ASP (By:01/2013)
DHMI STCA is a functionality included as part of the Interim SMART system. The STCA is in accordance with EUROCONTROL specifications.
‐ 100% Completed
30/09/2008
ATC16
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
87% Late
‐
The training plan for ACAS II version 7.1 has been developed. ATC units have been monitoring the performance of ACAS. Regulation on ACAS II version 7.1 has been published on 06 November 2015. Certain type of the military transport aircraft have been equipped with ACAS.
31/12/2019
REG (By:12/2015)
DGCA Regulation on ACAS II version 7.1 has been published on 06 November 2015.
‐ 100% Completed
01/12/2015
ASP (By:03/2012)
DHMI The training plan for ACAS II version 7.1 has been developed.ATC units have been monitoring the performance of ACAS.
‐ 100% Completed
31/03/2012
MIL (By:12/2015)
Mil. Authority
Certain type of the transport aircraft have been equipped with ACAS. The training has been completed.All the transport type a/c with ACAS II will be equipped until end of 2019
‐ 55%
Late
31/12/2019
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 49 Released Issue
FCM01
Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006
89% Late
‐
Some system modifications are still required and the date of 12/2017 is the planned completion date for all objectives.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:07/2014)
DHMI
Objective FCM01‐ASP08 will be in SMART phase so date of 12/2016 is the planned completion date. The other remaining objectives are ready and FSA mesages for Ankara have been tested with CFMU and approved. The software is not installed in accordance with sending proper FSA messages for Istanbul and Izmir . In addition the system is sending OAT rather than just GAT correlated flight data. All objectives will be completed by 12/2016.
‐ 89%
Late
31/12/2018
INF04
Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012
100% Completed
‐
All infrastructure ready for full implementation in 07/2010. 31/07/2010
ASP (By:12/2012)
DHMI ‐ ‐ 100% Completed
31/07/2010
Mil. Authority
All infrastructure ready for full implementation in 07/2010.
‐ 100% Completed
31/07/2010
ITY‐COTR
Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Turkey is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ‐
ASP (By:12/2012)
DHMI ‐ ‐ % Not
Applicable
‐
MIL (By:12/2012)
Mil. Authority
‐ ‐ % Not
Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 50 Released Issue
Local Objectives
AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local
0% Planned
LTCO ‐ AGRI
Remote tower services planned by the end of 2019. 31/12/2019
ATC18 Multi‐Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local
% Not
Applicable
‐
Considered as not applicable in TR. ‐
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local
100% Completed
LTAI ‐ Antalya Airport
PBN SIDs have been developed and implemented for Antalya Airport. These SIDs are designed to provide optimised vertical profile and short track and to avoid the conflict btn. STARs and SIDs as possible. Also, CCO techniques are implemented by ATC as tactically for stated airports now. The necessary notification in AIP will be issued in short term.
01/06/2016
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local
100% Completed
LTBA ‐ ISTANBUL/ATATURK
PBN SIDs have been developed and implemented for Istanbul Atatürk. These SIDs are designed to provide optimised vertical profile and short track and to avoid the conflict btn. STARs and SIDs as possible. Also, CCO techniques are implemented by ATC as tactically for stated airports now. The necessary notification in AIP will be issued in short term.
01/06/2016
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local
100% Completed
LTBS ‐ MUGLA/DALAMAN (MIL.CIV.)
PBN SIDs have been developed and implemented for Dalaman Airport. These SIDs are designed to provide optimised vertical profile and short track and to avoid the conflict btn. STARs and SIDs as possible. Also, CCO techniques are implemented by ATC as tactically for stated airports now. The necessary notification in AIP will be issued in short term.
01/06/2016
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local
100% Completed
LTFE ‐ MILAS/BODRUM
PBN SIDs have been developed and implemented for Milas Bodrum Airport. These SIDs are designed to provide optimised vertical profile and short track and to avoid the conflict btn. STARs and SIDs as possible. Also, CCO techniques are implemented by ATC as tactically for stated airports now. The necessary notification in AIP will be issued in short term.
01/06/2016
NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Applicability and timescale: Local
% Not
Applicable
‐
Considered as not applicable in TR. ‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 51 Released Issue
ANNEXES
ANNEX A ‐ Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process
LSSIP Co‐ordination
LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name
LSSIP National Focal Point for Turkey DHMI Cihan Sahin
EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support
Function Directorate Name
LSSIP Contact Person for Turkey DECMA/PEPR Predrag VRANJKOVIC
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 52 Released Issue
Implementation Objectives
Implementation Objective
EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners
National Stakeholder Specialist
AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI
AOM19.1 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /
O. MROWICKI
AOM19.2 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /
O. MROWICKI
AOM19.3 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /
O. MROWICKI
AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN
AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN
AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM
AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM
AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE
AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM
AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE
AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM
AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM
AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE
ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI
ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI
ATC07.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending
ATC12.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending
ATC15.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending
ATC15.2 L. DELL’ORTO P. HOP
ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO S. MORTON
ATC18 L. DELL’ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI
COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU
COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU
COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS
ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN
ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY
ENV03 A‐P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN
FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI
FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI
FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI
FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI
FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 53 Released Issue
FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI
INF07 A‐P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY
ITY‐ACID O. CIOARA pending
ITY‐ADQ A‐P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER
ITY‐AGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC
ATY‐AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET
ITY‐FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU
ITY‐SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY
NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC
NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC
NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH
NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET
SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 54 Released Issue
ANNEX B ‐ National Stakeholders Organisation charts 1. DHMI Organisational Chart
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 55 Released Issue
2. DGCA Organisational chart
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 56 Released Issue
ANNEX C – Implementation Objectives’ Applicability
Objective SESAR
Key Feature
ICAO ASBU
B0 European ATM Masterplan Level 3 Applicability area
AOM13.1
‐ All ECAC States except Albania, Latvia, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and
Moldova.
AOM19.1
B0‐FRTO All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Malta, Luxembourg, and
Moldova
AOM19.2
‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova
AOM19.3
‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova
AOM21.1
B0‐FRTO 25 ECAC States
AOM21.2
‐ All ECAC States except Azerbaijan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the
Netherlands
AOP04.1
B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports
AOP04.2
B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports
AOP05
B0‐ACDM 25 PCP airports, 21 non‐PCP airports
AOP10
‐ 16 PCP Airports
AOP11
‐ 24 PCP airports, 15 non‐PCP airports
AOP12
‐ 25 PCP airports
AOP13
‐ 25 PCP airports
AOP14
‐ Local: Low to medium complexity aerodromes, subject to local needs
ATC02.2 B0‐SNET Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all ECAC States that did
not yet implement it
ATC02.8
B0‐SNET All ECAC States except the Netherlands
ATC02.9
B0‐SNET TMAs, according to local business needs
ATC07.1
B0‐RSEQ 23 PCP Airports, 8 non‐PCP airports
ATC12.1
‐ All ECAC States except Luxembourg
ATC15.1
B0‐RSEQ
EU States except Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovak
Republic, Slovenia. Plus: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maastricht UAC,
Norway, Switzerland, Turkey
ATC15.2
‐ ACCs within the extended AMAN horizon, including those adjacent to
TMAs serving/associated to PCP airports
ATC16 B0‐ACAS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that
did not yet implement it
ATC17
B0‐FICE All ECAC States except Ireland, Slovak Republic and Ukraine
ATC18
‐ Local: Subject to local needs and complexity
COM10
‐ All ECAC States
COM11
‐ All ECAC States
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 57 Released Issue
COM12
‐
‐ Area 1 (ANSPs signatories of the NewPENS Common Procurement
Agreement): 33 ANSPs
‐ Area 2 (Other stakeholders): Stakeholders from all ECAC States not part
of Area 1
ENV01
B0‐CDO 59 Airports
ENV02
‐ 47 Airports
ENV03
B0‐CCO Local: Aerodromes subject to local needs and complexity
FCM01 B0‐NOPS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that
did not yet implement it
FCM03
B0‐NOPS All ECAC States
FCM04.1
B0‐NOPS Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland,
Spain, Switzerland
FCM04.2
B0‐NOPS All EU+ States
FCM05
B0‐NOPS All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC
and Moldova
FCM06
B0‐NOPS All EU+ States
FCM07
‐ All EU+ States
FCM08
‐ All ECAC States
FCM09
‐ All ECAC States
INF04 B0‐DATM Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that
did not yet implement it
INF07
‐ All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC
INF08.1
‐ All EU+ States
INF08.2
‐ All EU+ States
ITY‐ACID
‐ All EU+ States
ITY‐ADQ
B0‐DATM All EU+ States except FYROM, Georgia and Maastricht UAC
ITY‐AGDL
B0‐TBO All EU+ States except Georgia, Luxembourg and Netherlands
ITY‐AGVCS2
‐ All EU+ States except Georgia and Moldova
ITY‐COTR B0‐FICE Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all EU+ States that did
not yet implement it
ITY‐FMTP
B0‐FICE All ECAC States
ITY‐SPI
B0‐ASUR All EU+ States
NAV03.1
B0‐CDO,
B0‐CCO All ECAC States except Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Slovak Republic
NAV03.2
‐ Mandatory for TMAs listed in section 1.2.1 of the Annex of the PCP
Regulation. For all other ECAC TMAs, according to local business needs
NAV10
B0‐APTA All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC
NAV12
‐ Local: TMAs subject to local needs and complexity
SAF11
‐ All ECAC States except Malta
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 58 Released Issue
Legend:
Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:
Optimised ATM Network Services
High Performing Airport Operations
Advanced Air Traffic Services
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
LSSIP Year 2017 Turkey 59 Released Issue
ANNEX D ‐ Glossary of Abbreviations
This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Turkey.
Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
Term Description
AF ATM Functionality
FT Fast Track
PCP Pilot Common Project
PDP Preliminary Deployment Programme
S‐AF Sub ATM Functionality
ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance System
ACC Area Control Centre
AF ATM Functionality
AIS Aeronautical Information Services
AMC Acceptable means of Compliance
ANS Air Navigation Services
ANSP ANS Provider
AOP Airports Operations (Domain)
APV Approach with Vertical Guidance
ARN ATS Route Network
ATC Air Traffic Control
ATCO Air Traffic Controller
ATFM Air Traffic Flow Management
ATM Air Traffic Management
ATS Air Traffic Services
CAD Civil Aviation Department
CDM Collaborative Decision Making
CEATS Central European Air Traffic Services
CFMU Central Flow Management Unit
CNS Communications, Navigation and Surveillance
COM Communications
CTR Control Zone
DFL Division Flight Level
EAD European AIS Database
eAIP European Aeronautical Information Publication
EATM European Air Traffic Management