lo calibration rate discussion

12
Remote Sensing Laboratory Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Rem ote S en sin g Laboratory LO calibration rate discussion UPC/BEC

Upload: amery-marshall

Post on 03-Jan-2016

27 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

LO calibration rate discussion. UPC/BEC. Reference image. Hawaii. UPC analysis. Differences snapshot to snapshot. Tmeas-Tref. Thermal noise is huge!!. SEPARATING NOISE COMPONENTS. Calibrated visibility:. decimation schemas. interpolated to time meas from cal data. Differences. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LO calibration rate discussion

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory

LO calibration rate discussion

UPC/BEC

Page 2: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 2

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory

HawaiiU

PC

ana

lysi

s

Reference image

Page 3: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 3

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory

Differences snapshot to snapshot

Page 4: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 4

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory

Tmeas-Tref

Thermal noise is huge!!

Page 5: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 5

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory

j

kj

kjsysjsyskkj eG

MTTV

2)2( j

kj

kjsysjsyskkj eG

MTTV

6)6( j

kj

kjsysjsyskkj eG

MTTV

1)()2()2()( 2 njkjkj

nkj eVVVV

VVV scenekjkj )2(

11 )()( 22 nn jjscenekjn eVeVD

Calibrated visibility:

10)10( j

kj

kjsysjsyskkj eG

MTTV

interpolated to time meas from cal data

decimation schemas

Differences

The visibility has thermal noise:

noisescene TTT then

Error in geophysical signal

Thermal noise component

SEPARATING NOISE COMPONENTS

Page 6: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 6

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory sceneT

Page 7: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 7

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory noiseT

Page 8: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 8

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory noisescene TT

Page 9: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 9

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory

Does averaging cancel the LO phase error?

6min-2min 10min-2min

Spatial structures appear both cross-track and along-track

(Tx+Ty)/2 averaging 0 to 40º incidence angles. Simulation: Vref+phase error

Page 10: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 10

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory

Same effect in real data

6min-2min 10min-2min

The structures are still present

Actual data with decimated calibration

Page 11: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 11

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory

The LO-phase error induces structure in xi-eta

6min-2min

10min-2min

Average of 126 snapshots of TBn-TB2 (actual data)

Page 12: LO calibration rate discussion

30/May/11-1/June/11 QWG-5 ESRIN 12

Remote Sensing LaboratoryUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya

•Remote•Sensing•Laboratory

Conclusions

• LO phase drift produces non-random visibilities errors that translate to brightness temperature spatial structures in xi-eta.

• Relatively small phase error (low standard deviation) may have impact on the image due to this systematic behaviour.

• Simulation data confirms the experimental results. Spatial structures are expected to encounter in SSS retrievals due to imperfect LO phase error cancellation.